IR 05000320/1976009
| ML19220B408 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 08/18/1976 |
| From: | Durr J, Heishman R, Narrow L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19220B401 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-320-76-09, 50-320-76-9, NUDOCS 7904250698 | |
| Download: ML19220B408 (13) | |
Text
-
..
IT.:I Torn 12 (.
75) (R ev)
.
U. S. I UCLEAR RECUL' STORY CC:::!ISSION
.
OFFICE OF IIISPECTIO:: M D E:iFORCDIE!!T REGIO:I I
,
IE Inspection Report 1o:
50- 320/76-09 Docket 1:o:
50-320.
Licensce:
Metropolitan Edison Company License 'lo:
CPPR-66 Box 542 Priority:
--
Reading, Pennsylvnnia 19603 Category:
B
.
Safeguards
--
Group:
Location:
Middletown, Pennsylvania (TMI-2)
Type cf Licensee:
Ty of Inspection:
Routine, Unannounced Augus t 3-6, 1976 Dates of Inspection:
June 7-11,1976 Dates of Previous Inspection:
_
Af
/
/
//
l n
[
-
't *Le r j ? ' *<..*.
r
/
'
.
Reporting Inspector:
.
'e.' '*
e L. Narrow, Reactor Inspector
,
DATE E
IE ( f' M u
'f
?// '/7f-Accc=panying Inspectors:
J. Durr, Reactor 'nspector
' DATE wn_J fb
L'. ' Gage, Reactor Inspector dATE
'
DATE Other Acccapanying Personnel:
,
DAT~
/ ']
Revicwed By:
'
FF.' Heishman, Chief, Construction Projects Section GATE
{
Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch I
.
'ii) 2.$.I i
.
790425064 [
.
-
..
SU % RY OF FINDINGS Enforcement Action Itens of Nonco=nliance Nr Licensee Action on Previous 1v Identified Enforcement Ite=s A.
Use of uncontrolled and uncalibrated crimping tools has been resolved.
(Details, Paragrap5 2)
B.
Outdoor storage of electrical cable without protective covering re=ains unresolved.
(Details, Paragraph 3)
C.
Receiving and inspection of equipment purchased under Speci-fication 2555-999 renains unresolved.
(Details, Paragraph 15)
Desien Chances None Unusual Occurrences
.
None Other Sienificant Findings A.
Current Findings 1.
The following items are unresolved:
a.
Report by the licensee of a possible discrepancy between the required and expected response times of certain engineered safety system features.
(Details, Paragraph 4)
b.
Nonconforming weld contours at velds 2-CF-11, 2-CF-12, and 2-CF-V4B in the core flood piping system.
(D e t ails,
Paragraph 5)
2.
The following itecs are considered to be acceptable:
a.
The as installed conditicn of the Nuclear Services Closed Cooling Water sys te= from pump -NS-P-1B to Coolers MU-C-2A and MU-C-2B.
(Details, Paragraph 6)
(
l
.
l 5 ;> 13123
.
-
--
-2-
.
b.
Installatis.n of instrumentation and contro] cable.
(Details,
,
Paragraph 7)
c.
Documentation of installation and hookup of process instrumentation.
(Details, Paragraph 8)
.
d.
Documentaticn of installation and wiring of instru-mentation cabinets.
(Details, Paragraph 9)
e.
Observation of welding on joint SV-52.
(Details, Paragraph 10)
f.
Documentation of welding and magnetic particle testing for condensate storage tank CD-T-1A.
(Details, Paragraph 11)
Electrode storage and issue areas for reactor building g.
weiding.
(Details, Paragraph 12)
h.
Liquid penetrant testing of weld joint 2-MS-91W.
(Details, Paragraph 13)
B.
Previonsiv Reported Unresolved Items, 1.
The discrepancy between the requirements of Specification 2555-72 and Procedure NPT-1-NP for liquid penetrant testing has been resolved.
(Details, Paragraph 14)
C.
Deviations None Exit Interview An exit interview was held at the site on August 6,1976.
Persons Present General Public Utilities Service Corporation R. F. Fenti, QA Auditor S. Levin, Project Engineer P. A. Levine, QA Auditor M. J. Stromberg, Sr. Site Auditor
-
J. E. Wright, QA Manager (
.
'eu 313
.
l
.
_
~3-
.
M ted Encineers and Constructors
J. Carrabba, Assistent Saperintendent, QC-Constructior.
D. C. Lambert, Field Supervisor QC E. Somdahl, Instrument Supervisor
.
Burns & Roe G. T. Harper, Jr., Site Project Engineer The items discussed are su=marized below.
In each case, the licensee acknowledged the information.
A.
Scope of Inspection The inspector stated that the inspection was conducted to review the status of outstanding items and the QC program for instru-mentation, pleing and structural welding.
B.
Items of Noncompliance The inspector stated that no items of noncompliance had been identified.
i C.
Unresolved Items The inspector discussed the items listed under part A.1 of Current Findings of the Su= mary of Findings and stated that these items are unresolved. (Details, Paragraphs 4 and 5)
,
D.
Acceptable Iteus The inspector identified the items listed under part A.2 of Current Findings of the Su= mary of Findings and stated that these items had been inspected with no discrepancies identified.
(Details, Paragraphs 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13)
E.
Previousiv Reported Items 1.
The inspector discussed item A of Previously Identified Enforce-ment Items and item B.1 of Previously Reported Unresolved Items of the Su= mary of Findings and stated that these items are resolved.
(Details, Paragraphs 2 and 14)
.
2.
The inspector discussed items B and C of Previously Identified Enforcement Ite=s and stated that these items remain unresolved (
pending completion of the work.
(Details, Paragraphs 3 and 15)
I
-
i
.
,
-
--
.
DETAILS e
1.
P e r s on s Ca__n.t. a c t e d
.
,
General Public Utilities Service Corporation
,
R. F. Fenti, QA Auditor P. Karisn, Electrical Engineer S. Levin, Project Engineer
.
P. A. Levine, QA Auditor M. A. Nelson, Technical Engineer J. Spinak, Lead QA Engineer M. J. Stromberg, Senior Site Auditor J. E. Wright, Site QA Manager United Engineers and Constructors S-Abbott, Welding Superintendent J. Carrabba, Assistant Superintendent, QC-Construction R. Crofton, QC Engineer J. Godleski, QA Engineer K. Harvey, QC Ergineer, Instru=entation A. Heirey, Welding Rod Storage Attendant D. Lambert, QC Supervisor R. W. Liscom, QC Engineer, Electrical D. Long, 3rd, QC Electrical Coordinator F. Mikolajecyk, Instrument Supervisor D. R r,, Electrical Supervisor J. Schmh t, Records Supervisor E. Scadahl, Instrument Supervisor D. Travers, Electrical Superintendene.
W. E. Whitcomb, Electrician
, Burns & Roe, Inc.
E. M. Cirry, QA Site Group Supervisor Conam S. McCullough, Inspector
.
!
r :
v.,. J
.
,3 c-f 1J
.
-
..
-5-2.
Uncontrolled Crinnint Tools
.
During previous inspections lack of procedures for control and calibration of crimping tools and the use of uncontrolled and uncalibrated crimping tools had been identified.
(Inspection Reports 50-320/75-14 and 76-06)
.
The inspec' tor e<amined the following documents:
a.
UE&C Electrical Construction Procedure ECP-3-2, Rev. 16, dated June 7, 1976. Paragraph 4.10.1.1 of this procedure states that crimping tools used in the field shall have an inspection check in accordance with manuf acturer's instructions every two months ;
that Field QC shall be notified in order to verify the 4aspec-tion check if applicable; and that records shall be maintained by the Electric Construction Department (ECD).
b.
UE&C meno dated July 7,1976 from the Electrical Superintendent stating that the AMP tools had been calibrated by the AMP representative and other crimping tools had been calibrated in the field in accordance with the manufacturers requirements; that hand tools had been numbered and issued to assigned electricians; hydraulic tools will be kept in locked boxes and issued as required and that all tools will be calibrated every two months.
UE&C meao dated July 7 from the Electrical Superintendent c.
requi' ting that Area Foremen, Foreman and Journeymen be re-instructed that only those tools issued by the Termination Section are permitted to be used on the site.
.
d.
QC Inspection Report (QCIR) No. E-15358 reporting calibration of three T&B power tools and listing new AMP tools received on site which had been calibrated at the factory prior to shipment.
e.
QCIR Nc. E-15321 reporting a spot check of cri= ping tools in use which verified that all tools checked were in control.
f.
Field Change No. 209 dated July 15, 1976 to Procedure QC-13-2 which provided that crirping tools in use by Start-Up and Test be calibrated every six months.
g.
ECD list of tools showing date of calibration and journeyman to whom each tool was issued.
,
t
?
-
i Sir 3tG
.
.
-
..
-6-
.
The inspector was informed by the licensee's representative tFat crimping tools used by Start-Up and Test and the gages used in
-
calibration of all tools were calibrated and stored in the instru-ment shop and issued as required. The inspector observed storage and identification of these tools and gages.
.
This item is resolved.
3.
Outdocr Storage of Electrical Cable Lack of procedural controls for protection of electrical cable in outdoor storage and failure to provide protection for such cable had previously been identified.
(Inspection Reports 50-320/75-13 and 76-08)
The inspector examined DR No. 0614 which identified cable reels which had beer left uncovered for an indeterninate period of time.
Corrective action showed temporary coverings to have been applied as of June 15, 1976 and the Disposition required dielectric and megohm tests to be performed on representative samples of the cable to determine its acceptability.
The inspector observed the condition of the cable in outdoor storage and found several reels including Nos. E 6171, B 4901, X 9798 and E 982 to be uncovered. These reels had been returned to outdoor storage during the week ending July 31, 1976.
However, Procedure ECP-3-2, Kev. 12, requires that the reels be protected without establishing any time period during which they may remain uncovered.
In addition, the tests required by DR No. 0614 have not been performed.
This item remains unresolved pending performance of the required tests and clarification of the require =ents for providing protective covering.
4.
Response Time for Engineerirg Safety System The licensee reported as a possible Significant Deficiency in accord-ance with 10 CFR 50.55(e) that the expected response times for certain Engineered Safety System features appeared to be longer than the required response times. The licensee's representative stated that the expected response times were based on estimated or known equipment responses. The required response times used for the High Pressure Injection, Low Pressure Injection and Reactor Building Cooling Systems were identified in the FSAR.
Other required response times were assumed by the licensee's representative.
(
n e er
.g h)
-
$
.
i
.
-
-
_y_
_
This item is unresolved pending further review by the licensee
.
cnd the A-E.
-
5.
Nonconfor=ing Weld Contours
.
The inspector observed three weld joints in the Core Flood Tank 14 inch piping which appeared to be completed but do not meet the USAS B31.7-1969 Nuclear Power Piping Code requirements for weld bead contours. The welds were identified as numbers 2-CF-ll, 2-CF-12.R1 and'2-CF-V4B and are located in the piping connecting the core flood tank and the reactor vessel.
Welds numbered 2-CF-ll and 2-CF-V4B are designated, in the FSAR, as nuclear class 2 and 2-CF-12.R1 is nuclear class 1.
The transition surface between the weld reinforcement and the adjacent component presents an abrupt step rather than merging smoothly as required by the USAS B31.7-1969, paragraphs 1-727.4.2 (c) and (d).
The licensee stated that this conditien had been identified by a GPU auditor but had not been formally documented at the time of this inspection.
He also stated that these weld transition surfaces would be unacceptable for in-service inspection testing and would require additional finishing.
This item is unresolved pend'ng determination of the status of the subject weld joints relative to th'e quality control inspection program (have the welds received final acceptance) and verification that the condition is localized to the core flood piping system.
6.
Nuclear Services Closed Cooling Water System The inspector observed the as installed condition of this system between Pump NS-P-1B and Coolers MU-C-2A and MU-C-2B.
Piping installation was verified to be in accordance with B&R Flow Diagram, Drawing No. 2030, Rev. 21; a7 well as Drawings Nos. 2007, Rev. 15; 2015, Rev. 11; 2027, Rev. 17; and 2030, Rev. 21.
Hangers and restraints were verified to have been installed in accordance with Bergen Paterson Drawings E-141-4, sheets 1 and 2; M. W. Kellog Isometric Drawings Nos. 2-21-18, Rev. D; 2-21-17, Rev. B; 2-21-16, Rev.'A; and 2 21-15, Rev. C as well as detailed hanger sketches.
The inspector observed that inspection of this system had been per-formed in accordance with the appropriate QC pre.cedures for Mechanical Equipment (QC-10-2, Rev. 2), Pipe Support Installation Inspection (QC-10-2, Appendix B), Pipe Welding Con. trol (QC-8-2, Rev. 5) and We'_ ding Control (QC-8A-2, Rev. 2).
\\
s Af M3
.
%
-
.
.
- 8-
.
During " walk down" of the line the inspector visually examined welding of supports for hangers and restraints as well as conformance of the e
line to the above procedures.
Incomplete items and minor deficiencies identified during this " walk down" were found to have been noted on the " punch list" prepared during the turnover inspection of the line.
The turnover inspection had been conducted in accordance with General
Construction Procedure CCP-5-2, Rev. 8 "PJping Systems and Related Equipment Package Turnover to Start-Up and/or Quality Control."
No discrepancien were identified.
7.
Installation of Instrumentation and control Cable a.
Installation of Cable The inspector selected cable pull slips, numbered II 2935C (Rev.1) and 11 2902C (Rev. 2), from records of saf ety-related cablas that had been installed and terminated and had been checked by the quality control activity. He examined the routings of the cables through the cable trays and the cable terminations at the cabinets, and he verifier. that the cables were installed in accordance with the pull siips and the con-structor's Electrical Construction Procedure No. ECP-3-2 (Rev. 16),
titled " Receiving, Storing, Handling and Ins talling Wire and Cable."
No discrepancies were identified.
b.
Control of Cable Reels
.
The inspecto' reviewed the records of cable disbursement frca stored cable reels, and he interviewed the constructor's supervisor of this activity.
Cable inventory was recorded by the super-visor on a copy of drawing 9459-02. titled " Unit #2 Cable."
The record indicated that cable inventory was being currently revised to reflect cable disbursement as the cable-pull slips were returned. The constructor stated that the inventor ~ revisions ware made from the actual cable lengths indicated on the pull slips.
The inspector checked that the inventory revisions for the cables disbursed against pull slips II 2935C and II 2902C were recorded. They were recorded-against Kerice cable-reel numbers C-2243 and A-8274, respectively. These reels corresponded to the cable jacket designations FR-9KK and FR-9FF.
No discrepancies were identified.
!
c ' t)- - 91 (}
.
ts A. s =
,
.
-
-
_9_
.
Confirmation of Cable Material
-
c.
The inspector reviewed the material-received records for the cables identified on pull slips II 2935C and II 2902C: Kerite cable-reel nu=bers C-2243 and A-8274.
The records indicated
.
.
that:
(1)
reel C-2243 was ordered by perchase order number C 0084 to Burns & Roe specification nunber 2555-68.
Kerfte's letter dated 10/19/73 provided test data to verify that the specification had been met.
(20 reel A-8274 was ordered by the same purchase order and specification. Kerite's letter dated 5/10/73 provided the test data to verify that the specification had been met.
No discrepancies were identified.
Doctmentation of Installation and Book-un of Procers Instrumentation _
8.
The inspector selected the following items f rom the quality control records of calibrated, installed, and inspected process instru=entation:
Item Name QC Inspection Renort No.
WDL-LT-1318 transmitter I-1305 WDL-DPI-3637 pressure gauge I-854 WDL-DPIS-3644 pressure gauge I-1448 these ite=s were installed in accordance The inspector verified that with the constructor's QC inspection reports and associated instal-latica drawings. The inspector also verified that the installed ite=s bore calibration stickers; he then exa=ined the record for WDL-DPI-3637 in the calibration laboratory to verify the accuracy of the calibration sticker.
No discrepanties were identified.
.
b e
I-a
&d vku
_
t
.
-
-10-
_
9.
Documentation of Installation and Wiring of Instrumentation Cabinets
-
11e inspector selected the following items from the quality control records of installed and inspected instrumentation cabinets:
" Item Name QC Inspection
Report No.
.
Cabinet 133 SFAS Instrumentation Actuation 15533 Cabinet 198 SFAS Relay 15532 Cabinet 205 RC Pump Power Monitoring 15696 The inspector verified that these items were installed in accordance with the constructor's QC inspection reports and associated installa-tion drawings. The inspector examined the seismic anchoring for these cabinets to verify that they were anchored in accordance with the method provided in the constructor's Electrical Construction Pro-cedure No. ECP-10-2 (Rev. 4) Attachment E, titled " Equivalent Fillet Weld to Replace Each Anchor in the Base of Equipment."
The inspector selected the following wiring terminations in each cabinet, and he co= pared them with the architect-engineer's wiring
"run sheets" to verify the accuracy of the wiring hook-up to the cabinet:
Cabinet No.
Terminations 133 CR 768C SC 133C 198 HJ 62C M 1016C 205 H 241C H 205C No discrepancies were identified.
10.
Welding of Joint SV-52 The ir pector observed the welding of the root and filler passes on weld joint number SV-52, a 4 inch diameter pipe schedule 80, nuclear class 2, made,f 304 stainless steel material, and located in the steam generator secondary side vents and drains system.
He examined the joint alignment, weld bead appearance, checked for the use of proper welding procedures and filler materials, and the quality control documentation.
He also verified that the welder was qualified.
rw 904 j
dd LAA
.
.
.
..
.
-12-
.
12.
Electrode Storace and Issue
-
The inspector examined the reactor building welding electrode storage area for material control and storage practices. He noted that materials were segregated and clearly carked. The inspector
.
discussed the handling and issue practices with the storage area attendant.
No discrepancies were identified.
-
13.
NDE of Joint 2-MS-91U The inspector observed the liquid penetrant testing of weld joint 2-MS-91W, nuclear class 2.
The inspector witnessed the cleaning, penetrant application and recoval, the application of developer and the preliminary interpretation.
No discrepancies were identified.
14.
Licuid Penetrant Testine Requirements Reference:
Inspection Report 50-320/76-01 The above ref erenced report identified an inconsistency between the requirements of the Burns and Roe (B&R) specification 2555-72,
" Piping and Mechanical Equip =ent and Ins tallation" and the Conam Inspection Procedure LFT-1-NP, Revision III, paragraph VI in that the B&R specification does not allow any indications in the weld crater or the line of fusion whereas the applicable code and Conam Inspection procedure does. The B&R specification previously stated, in part: "All indications in the weld crater or in the line of fusion...shall be treated as defects." This was changed to read:
"The acceptance standards shall be in accordance with the applicable code."
The inspector verified that the Conam Inspection Procedure LPT-1-NP, paragraph VI, " Evaluation of Indications," is consistent with the applicable code, ASME III,1971 edition, paragraph NB-5352.
This item is resolved.
15.
Receiving Insnection Failure to conduct receiving inspection of orific'
.ates ordered under Specification No. 2555-999 had been identitled as a nonconpliance.
(Inspection Report 50-320/76-08)
-
\\
l
'o' W 2 2 2
'
.
i
.
_
-
.
..
.
.
.
-
-13-
-
In his response the licensee stated that the orifice plates had been
~
subjected to receiving inspection, that all similar purchase orders
'.
which fall under QA/QC scope had been brought to the attention of and acted on by the CPUSC QA Manager.
.
The inspector examined me=o, TMI-2/2588, dated July 9, 1976 and addressed to the QA Manager. A list of Jersey Central Power &
I.igh t Company (JCP&L) purchase orders under QA/QC scope was attached and listed seventeen orders for valves, electrical and speciality ite=s.
The inspector w.s informed by the QA representative that the orifice plates were on Hold (Tag ho. BR-916) for lack of complete documentation.
However, a number of items shown on the other listed purchase orders had been released to the field prier to receipt of the list. As examples, Relief valves (PD C-0182), Solenoid valves (PO C-0199) and Sigma Indicators (P0 C-Ol70) have all been released without the necessary documentation.
In some cases QA has prepared
" check plans" identifying the required documentation.
The QA Manager stated that all of the items purchcsed under the listed purchast orders, will be tagged " Hold" until the requirements for documentation has been established and the required documents have been received.
This item re=ains unresolved.
.
W
!
w na
-
i
'
i