IR 05000289/1974014

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Rept 50-289/74-14 on 740313,19,20 & 25.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Qa Program Changes to Resolve Insp Rept 50-289/74-09 Items
ML19253B743
Person / Time
Site: Crane Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 04/16/1974
From: Glasscock R, Mccabe E
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML19253B739 List:
References
50-289-74-14, NUDOCS 7910180727
Download: ML19253B743 (5)


Text

-

_

_ _ _ _ _

,

--

-

.

.

..

.~.

...

~..

.a.

..

...

.

.

.

.

,

.

_'

U.S. AT0'!IC E::ERGY COS2:ISSIO::

DIRECTORATE OF REGULATORY OPERATIONS

'N

.

REGION I

RO Inspection Report No:

50-289/74-14 Docket No:

50-259 Licensee:

Metropolitan Edison Cor.pany License No:

CPPR-10

,

Three Mile Island 1 Priority:

B1 Category:

Location:

Middletown, Pennsylvania

,

,

'

Typ'e of Licensee:

PWR, 871 MWe (B&W)

.

Type of Inspection:

SPecial, Operations Phase QA i

Dates of Inspection:

'

'

'

-

s. Dates of Previous Inspection:

~

'

i

!

Reporting Inspector

.k /Q 0

-

s

Mg.&v h./ d. - 2 d

'

,

R. B. Glasscock, Reactor. Inspector Date

-

j Accompanying Inspectors:

!

,

Date I

Date

.

.

Date t

.

.

Date

.

,

Other Accor.panying Personnel:

"

.

.

Date Reviewed By:

8. O. k M, h.

1445 182 a,.

E. C. Mc'Cabe, Senior Reactor Inspector Date Reactor Operations Branch

2 391018

.

_ _ _ _ _ _

_

__

,

_

,

.

.

-

,

.

'

s SUMMARY OF FI" DINGS Enforcement Action None Licensee Action on Previously Identified Enforcement Items Not Inspected Other Significant Findings A.

Current Findings

.

.

The inspection was performed to evaluate QA Program changes cade to resolve items identified in Report 50-289/74-09.

Criterion I remains unresolved.

(Details, Paragraph 2)

B.

Status of Other Previously Reported Unresolved Items All unresolved items from Report No. 50-289/74-09, with the exception es.

-(_

of Criterion I, are resolved..

.

Management Interview

_

,

The management intervire was held in the Metropolitan Edison Office in Reading, Pennsylvania on March 20 and 25, 1974.

Attendees Metropolit*n Edison Cocoany Mr. J. C. Herbein, Three Mile Island I Superintendent Mr. R. F. Jones, Jr., Manager Generation Engineering Mr. L. L. Lawyer, Manager Operational Quality Assurance Mr. B. M. McCutcheon, Quality Assurance Engineer The following sc==arizes items discussed:

A.

10 CFR 50 Appendix B, Criterion I, " organization" The inspector stated that the resolutien of this issue must await the Directorate of Licensing's decision on the licensee's position.

(Details, Paragraph 2)

.

1445 183

-

-

.

,

.

.

B.

The inspector stated the remaining open items regarding the Quality Assurance Program for Operations of the Three Mile Island One were resolved as of March 25, 1974.

C.

The licensee acknowlciged the inspector's state =ents.

'

.

,

e e

P'-

? N l

y e

e J

e e

O 1445 184

.

__

_

_.

.

'N

-

,,

i DETAILS 1.

Persons Contacted Metropolitan Edison Comoany Mr. R. C. Arnold, Vice President Mr. J. C. Herbein, Three Mile Island 1 Superintendent

}k. R. F. Jones, Jr., Manager Generation Engineering Mr. L. L. Lawyer, Manager Operational Quality Assurance Mr. B. M. McCutcheon, Quality Assurance Engineer 2.

10 CFR 50, Accendix B, Criterion I, Organization

.

The applicant does not retain responsibilities for quality assurance

for all activities involving GPUSC.

The application of the Opera-tional Quality Assurance Program is not established for quality affecting activities involving GPUSC.

At the time of the inspection Metropolitan Edison Company was in the process of revising their Quality Assurance Plan to be sub-mitted to the Direct 6 rate of Liccnsing for evaluation.

-

3.

10 CFR 50, Appen' dix B, Criterion III Measures to inplemant design control functions were incorporated into the program.

This item is resolved.

4.

10 CFR 50, Anoendix B, criterion IV The requirement that suppliers provide a Quality Assuranca Program consistent with the pertinent provisions of_ Appendix B, and that the necessary Quality requirements be included in the purchase documents are incorporated into the program.

This item is resolved.

5.

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V The procedures, instructions and drawings required to document all activitics affecting quality are now included in the program.

This item is resolved.

6.

10 CFR 50, Accendix B. Criterion VI Measures to control the issuance of changes and review of documents which prescribe all activities af f ecting quality have been incor-porated in the program.

This item is resolved.

.

1445 I85

_

_

_

___

_.

.

.

.

'

-

?y

,

7.

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion VII Means for evaluating contractors and assessing the effectiveness of their control have been incorporated into the program.

This item is resolved.

8.

10 CFR 50, Aooendix B, Criteri,n VIII Measures for identification and control of material, parts and components has been incorporated in the program.

This item is resolved.

9.

10 CFR 50, Aouendix B, Criterion X

.

The total program for inspection'of activities affecting quality has been included in the program.

This ites is resolved.

10.

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, criterion XI The test program, including previously missing elements to demon-strate that structure systems and components will perform satis-factorily in service, has been. incorporated into the program.

,..

(

This item is resolved.

11.

10 CFR 50, Aopendix B, Criterien XIV Missing procedures were evaluated and found in conformance with this requirement.

This item is resolved.

12.

10 CFR 50, Apoendix B, Criterion XV Measures to comply with this requirement have been incorporated into the program.

This item is resolved.

13.

10 CFR 50, Accendix B, Criterion XVI Measures to identify and correct conditions adverse to quality have been incorporated int.o the program.

This item is resolved.

.

.

T445 186

'