IR 05000280/1986035
| ML18149A455 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 11/25/1986 |
| From: | Blake J, Kleinsorge W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18149A452 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-280-86-35, 50-281-86-35, NUDOCS 8612090620 | |
| Download: ML18149A455 (12) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
101 MARIETTA STREET, ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323 Report Nos.:
50-280/86-35 and 50-281/86-35 Licensee:
Virginia Electric and Power Company Richmond, VA 23261 Docket Nos.:
50-280 and 50-281 License Nos.:
DPR-32 and DPR-37 Facility Name:
~~/f%b Date Sign d Approved SUMMARY Scope: This routine, announced inspection was conducted in the areas of licensee actions on previous enforcement matters (927018) (92702B), housekeeping (548348),
material identification and control (429028) material control (42940B), and inservice inspection (73051 and 73052).
Results:
No violations or deviations were identified.
- REPORT DETAILS Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- H. L. Miller, Assistant Station Manager
- D. L. Benson, Assistant Station Manager
- R. J. Hardwick, Manager, Nuclear Program and Licensing
- N. E. Clark, Manager, Quality Assurance (QA)
- R.H. Blount, Supervisor, Surveillance and Test Other licensee employees contacted included construction craftsmen, engineers, technicians, operators, mechanics, security office members, and office personne NRC Resident Inspector
- W. E. Holland, Senior Resident Inspector
- Attended exit interview Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on October 31, 1986, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 abov The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection finding No dissenting comments were received from the license (Open) Inspector Followup Item 50-280, 281/86-35-01:
11Liquid Penetrant Examination Procedure Discrepancies
- paragraph 6b(3)(b)2 (Open) Inspector Foll ow Item 50-280, 281/86-35-02:
11Magneti c Particle Examination Procedure Discrepancies
- paragraph 6b(3)(b)3 (Open) Inspector Followup Item 50-280, 281/86-35-03:
11Radiography Procedure Discrepancies
- paragraph 6b(3)(b)4 The licensee did identify as proprietary some of the materials provided to and reviewed by the inspector during this inspection; however, this material is not discussed in this repor Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters (92701B) (92702B)
This subject was not addressed in the inspection.
2 Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspectio.
Independent Inspection Effort Housekeeping (548348), Material Identification and Control (429028) and Material Control (429408)
The inspector conducted a general inspection of auxiliary building and the protected area to observe activities such as housekeeping, material identification and control; material control, and storag Within the areas examined, no violations or deviation were identifie Inservice Inspector (ISI)
The inspector reviewed procedures interviewed licensee/contractor personnel and reviewed records to detenni ne whether the licensee I s program and procedures pertaining to the Inservice Inspection (ISI) is complete and in conformance with regulatory requirements and the licensee's commitments, as indicated belo The applicable code for ISI is ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME B&P) Code,Section XI, 1980 Edition Winter 1980 Addend The licensee holder for the Surry station is Virginia Electric Power Company known as Virginia Power (VP) in the Commonwealth of Virgini Inservice inspections are being conducted in part by Westinghouse (W) under the W Quality Assurance Program and in part by VP under the VP Quality Assurance Progra There is no documented division between the inspections to be performed by W and VP; the decision is left to the vagary of the VP Nondestructive Examfnation (NOE) supervisor on a case-by-case basi Review of Program (73051)
(1)
Program Approval The inspector interviewed personnel and reviewed documents indicated below to determine whether requirements were met in the following areas:
ISI program, including examinations and tests, is in conformance with relevant ASME Code Section XI editions and addenda, and Code cases proposed for use as part of the pl an; services of an Authorized Nuclear Inservice Inspector (ANII)
have been procured and the ISI plan has been reviewed by the ANII in accordance with Article IWA-2120 of the ASME Code; and the ISI plan has been reviewed by the licensee's site nuclear safety review committee, or equivalent licnesee review and approval has been documented.
'
(2) Program Organization The inspector reviewed the licensee and ISI contractor QA programs to verify the following:
Procedures for the maintenance of required ISI records; QA review includes assurance that p 1 ans and procedures have been reviewed by appropriate personnel and meet regulatory requirement; procedures are established for the corrective action of conditions adverse to quality as detected during examination, including provisions to preclude repetition of such adverse conditions; audits or surveillances of ISI activities are conducted by qualified QA personnel to verify compliance with the ISI program; and procedures are established to effectively oversee contractor activities concerned with ISI/PS (3)
Repair Program The inspector reviewed the licensee's administrative and maintenance procedures indicated below to verify that the requirements of Article IWA-4000 of the ASME Code, and NRC supplementary requirements are included or reference (4)
Replacement Program The inspector reviewed the licensee's administrative and maintenance procedures indicated below to verify that requirements of Article IWA-7000 of the ASME Code, and NRC supplementary requirements, are included or reference (5)
Records The inspector reviewed procedures and records indicated below to determine whether provisions for the maintenance and retention of records, including inspection, examination, test reports, repair and replacement, QA and NOE records have been established in the ISI progra (6)
Qualifica+.ion of Personnel The inspector reviewed procedures indicated below to determine whether the ISI program specifies personnel qualification require-ments consistent with the ASME Code, plant Technical Specifica-tions (TS), and other applicable documents.
(7) Reporting Requirements The inspector reviewed procedures indicated below to determine whether the 1 i censee I s ISI program includes the ASME Code and plant TS requirements for submittal of written reports of ISI results, repairs, and replacement (8'
. ;
Relief Requests The inspector reviewed procedures indicated below to determine whether the 1 i censee I s program contains guidance regarding the identification and processing of requests for relied from ASME Code requi"rement Documents Examined Identification Revision 2 Revision O Revision O with Distribution 1-5 Revision 0 VP-POW-48-04 Revision April 25, 1986 VP-VEP 1-5A June 1986 VP-ENG-1. 0 January 16, 1986 VP-SUADM-ADM-29 Revision July 3, 1986 VP-NDOS-M-05 Revision O VP-SUADM-M-26 Revision March 21, 1986 VP-NDOS-AMD-09, Revision O Title
"Unit 1 Inspection Program Interval 2
"Unit 2 Inspection Program Interval 2
"Inservice Inspection Manual"
"Inservice Inspection Plan Surry Unit 1, Interval 2, Period 1, Refueling Outage 1986
"Preliminary Surry Unit 2 Refueling Inspection/Test Requirements (Issue #1)
"Topical Report, Quality Assurance Program, Operations Phase"
"Performance and Test Organization"
"Inservice Inspection Program - Organi-zation and Responsibilities"
"Inservice Inspection"
"ASME Section XI Inspection and Examination Control"
"Preparation and Control of Procedures"
- Identification VP-SUADM-M-23 Revision June 5, 1986 VP-SUADM-M-25 Revision 20, 1985 VP-SUADM-M-08 Revision May 27, 1986 VP-SUADM-M-27 Revision August 21, 1986 VP-SUADM-M-28 Revision February 27, 1986 VP-SUADM-M-29 Revision May 8, 1986 VP-SUADM-ADM-13 Revision April 3, 1986 VP-SUADM-ADM-21 Revision June 10, 1960 VP-SUADM-M-20, Revision October 8, 1985 VP-NOE Revision 7 VP-NDE-Revision 1 Review of Procedures (73052)
(1)
Program Requirements
Title
"Disposition of ASME Section XI Inspection and Testing Discrepancies 11ASME Documentation Control and Reporting Requirement" 11ASME Code Section XI Repair/Replacement Program"
"Requirements for a Repair or Replace-ment follower
"Control of Special Processes
"Control of Welding Materials"
"Records Management"
"Station Procedures" 11ASME Section XI Visual Examination Program (VT-2, 3 and 4)
VEPCO Written Practice for Certification of Nondestructive Examination Personnel" 11 NDE Vendor Qualification and Observation Procedure" The inspector reviewed the licensee's commitments in the SAR, Technical Specification (TS), and approved ISI program to ascertain whether ISI procedures adequately cover al 1 areas specific in the licensee's commitments for ISI and (PSI) require-ment (2)
Procedure Approval The inspector reviewed the below listed procedures to determine whether the ISI procedures have been approved by authorized 1 icensee personnel and by the Authorized Nuclear Inservice Inspector (ANII) where applicabl *
Identification VP-NDE-Revision 1 VP-NDE-Revision 3 VP-NDE-Revision 7 VP-NDE-Revision 1 VP-NDE-Revision 2 VP-NDE-MT-1 Revision 3 VP-NDE-5-MT-1, Revision 0 VP-NDE-5-PT/MT-1 Revision O VP-NDE-RT-1 Revision 0 VP-NDE-VT-1 Revision 0 VP-NDE-VT-2 Revision 1 Revision 1 VP-NDE-PT-1 Revision 4 VP-NDE-5-PT-1 Revision O
Documents Examined Title 11 Responsibilities and Organization of VEPCO NOE Program
11 Preparation, Issue and Control of Non-destructive Examination Procedures 11 VEPCO Written Practice for Certification of Nondestructive Examination Personnel" 11 NDE Vendor Qualifications and Observation Procedure" 11General Requirements for Nondestructive Testing
"Magnetic Particle Examination
"Wet Method - Suspension Concentration Check"
"Ultraviolet Light Intensity Verification
"Radiographic Examination"
"Visual Examination"
"Visual Examination"
"Virginia Power Nuclear Operations Visual Training Manual II Section Gen Pages 11 to 21 "Inservice Inspection Program Certification and Training
"Liquid Penetrant Examination 11Liquid Penetrant Comparitor Block"
(3)
Non-Destructive Examination (NOE)
(a)
Procedure Review The inspector reviewed the procedures indicated in paragraph (4) below to determine whether requirements are specified and agree with licensee's commitments including specified or referenced acceptance levels; qualifications of NOE personnel are specified in accordance with the licensee's approved ISI program; methods of recording, evaluating, and dispositioning findings are established and reporting requirements are in compliance with applicable Code requirements; and procedures delineate the scope of work and division of responsibilities between the licensee and the contracto (b) Technical Content 1)
Visual Examination The inspector reviewed the below listed visual examina-tion procedures to determine whether they contain information or reference to a general inspection procedure or supplementary instructions sufficient to assure that all parameters are specified and controlled within the limits permitted by the applicable Code and other additional specification requirements; each essential examination variables are defined and whether these variables are controlled within the limits specified by the applicable Code and other specifica-tion/contract requirement Specific areas examined were:
method; application; how visual examination is to be performed; type of surface condition; method or tool for surface preparation; direct or remote viewing; special illumination, instruments, or equipment; sequence of performing examination; data to be tabulated; acceptance criteria are specified consistent with the applicable Code and repent form or general statement to be complete Procedures Examined VP-NDE-VT-1 VP-NDE-VT-2 2)
Liquid Penetrant Examination The inspector reviewed the below listed liquid penetrant examination procedure to determine whether they contain information or references to a general inspection
procedure or supplementary instructions sufficient to assure that all parameters are specified and controlled within the limits permitted by the applicable Code and other additional specification requirements; each essential examination variables are defined and whether these variable are controlled within the limits specified by the applicable Code and other specifica-tion/contract requirement Specific areas examined were; specified test method is consistent with applicable Code requirement; brand names and specific types 'number or letter designation if available of penetrant, penetrant remover, emulsifier and developer are specified; penetrant materials used for nickel base a 11 oys are required by procedure to be analyzed for sulfur using the method prescribed by the applicable Code; penetrant materials used for the examination of austenitic stainless steel are required by procedure to be analyzed for total halogens using t.he method prescribed in the applicable Code; method for acceptable pre-examination of surface preparation are specified and consistent with the applicable Code, area to be cleaned is consistent with applicable requirements, cleanliness acceptance requirements are consistent with applicable Code requirements, surface area to be examined is consistent with applicable Code requirement; procedure established a minimum drying time following surface cleaning; method of penetrant application and the penetration (dwell) time are specified and that the penetration time is consistent with the penetrant manufacturer's recommendation; examination surface is specified and is consistent with the applicable Code; procedures (when applicable) specify acceptable methods for removing wa ter-washab 1 e penetrant consistent with the applicable Code; method of applying emulsifier (when applicable) and the maximum emulsification time is specified and consistent with the applicable Code; method for removal of solvent removable penetrant when applicable) are specified; method and time of surface drying prior to developing is specified; type of developer to be used, method of developer application and the time interval between penetrant removal and developed application specified; examination technique is specified and the permitted time interval during which the "final interpretation" is performed within the range of 7-30 minutes after developer application; minimum light intensity at the inspection site is prescribed; technique for evaluation of indications is specified, acceptance standards are included and these
are consistent with applicable Code and specific contract requirement; reporting requirements are specified; and procedure requires requalification when changes are encountere Procedures Examined VP-NDE-PT-1 VP-NDE-5-PT MT-1 VP-NDE-5-PT-1 With regard to the examination above, the inspector noted the following discrepancy:
Procedure VP-NDE-PT-1 did not adequately address Fluorescent examiners shall be in darkened area for at least five minutes prior to performing the examination to enable his eyes to adjust to dark viewing and if examiner wears glasses or lenses, they shall not be photo sensitiv This is contrary to good industry practice. The ASME has added this as a requirement to the 1983 Edition of Code Section The inspector discussed the above with the licensee who indicated that appropriate corrections would be made to the procedur Pending NRC review of the amended procedure, this matter will be identified as Inspector Followup Item 50-280, 281/86-35-01 "Liquid Penetrant Examination Procedure Discrepancies."
3)
Magnetic Particle Examination The inspector reviewed the below listed magnetic particle examination procedures to determine whether they contain information or references to a general inspection procedure or supplementary i nstructi ans sufficient to assure that all parameters are specified and controlled within the limits permitted by the applicable Code and other additional specification requirements; each essential examination variable is defined and whether these variables are controlled within the limits specified by the applicable Code and other specification/contract requirement Specific areas examined were method -
continuous; surface preparation; particle contrast; surface temperature; light intensity; coverage; prod spacing; magnetizing current and yoke pole spacing; and acceptance criteria are specified consistent with the applicable ASME Code Section and specific contract requirement..e.r_ocedures Examined VP-NDE-MT-1 VP-NDE-5-MT-l VP-NDE-5-PT/MT-1 With regard to the examination above, the inspector noted the following discrepancies:
Procedure VP-NDE-MT-1 did not adequately address Fluorescent particle examination performed in a darkened area contrary to ASME section V paragraph T-753fc).
Demagnetization, contrary to ASME section V paragraph T - 732(9).
Maximum yoke pole spacing T-783(a)
Fluorescent examiners sha 11 be in darkened area for at least five minutes prior to performing the examination to enable his eyes to adapt to dark viewing and if examiners wears glasses or lenses they shall not be photo sensitiv This is contrary to good industry practice, which the ASNlE has added this as a requirement to the 1983 Edition of Code Section V The inspector discussed the above with the licensee who indicated that appropriate corrections would be made to the procedur Pending NRC review of the amended procedure this matter will be identified as Inspector Fo11owup Item 50-280, 281/86-35-02: "Magnetic Particle Examination Procedure Discrepancies."
4)
Radiographic Examination The inspector reviewed the below listed radiographic examination procedures to determine whether they contain information or references to a general inspection procedure or supplementary instructions sufficient to assure that all parameters are specified and controlled within the limits permitted by the applicable Code and other additional specification requirements; each essential examination variables are defined and whether these variables are controlled within the limits specified by the applicable Code and other specifica-tion/contract requirement Specific areas examined
...
...
were:
material and weld surface condition requirements; types of material to be radiographed; material thickness range; type of radiation source, effective focal spot or effective source size, X-ray equipment voltage rating and equipment manufacturer, as applicable; file brand or type and number of films in cassettes; minimum source to film distance; blocking or masking technique, if used; type and thickness of intensifying screens and filters; exposure conditions for procedure qualification, if applicable; radiographic film requirement; quality of radiographs; film density limits for single and composite viewing; use of densitometers for assuring compliance with film density requirement; system of radiograph identification; use of location markers; records for showing film and source 1 ocati on with reference to the part being radiographed; use of i ntens i fyi ng screens; methods of reducing and testing for backscatter; description of or reference to the welding procedure; material type thickness restriction for isotope radiography; geometrical unsharpness limitations; selection and use of penetramenter including penetrameter design, selection of essential hole, penetrameter thickness including special require-ments for single and double wall viewing, penetrameter placement including special requirements for single and double wall viewing, number of penetrameter, radio-graphic technique requirements for double wall viewing; qualification of radiographic procedure; requirements for evaluation and disposition of radiographs; and records requirement Procedure Examined VP-NDE-RT-1 With regard to the examination above, the inspector noted the following discrepancies:
Procedure VP-NDE-RT-1 did not adequately address material thickness range, minimum source to film di stance and maximum source size, contrary to ASME section V para-graph T-282(a), (c) and (d), respectivel The inspector discussed this with the licensee who indicated that appropriate corrections would be made to the procedur Pending NRC review of the amended procedure will be identified as Inspector Followup Item 50-280, 281/86-35-03: "Radiograph Procedure Discrepancies" Within the areas examined, no deviations or violations were identified.