IR 05000280/1985026

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Repts 50-280/85-26 & 50-281/85-26 on 850806-0902.No Violation or Deviation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Items,Plant Security,Followup of Events & LERs
ML18143B624
Person / Time
Site: Surry  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 09/17/1985
From: Burke D, Marlone Davis, Elrod S
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML18143B623 List:
References
50-280-85-26, 50-281-85-26, NUDOCS 8509260302
Download: ML18143B624 (4)


Text

Report Nos. :

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION II

101 MARIETTA STREET, ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323 50-280/85-26 and 50-281/85-26 Licensee:

Virginia Electric and Power Company Richmond, VA 23261 Docket Nos.:

50-280 and 50-281 License Nos.:

DPR-32 and DPR-37 Facility Name:

Surry 1 and 2 Approved ugust 6 - September 2, ~985 Senior Resident Inspector

.

. Davis*, iesident Inspector by: J~rz/\\

S. Elrod, Section Chief Division of Reactor Projects SUMMARY date Signed

/

(

igned 1/ r1/r(

lfiat/e Signed Scope:

This inspection entailed 160 inspector-hours on-site in the areas of plant operations and operating records, plant maintenance and surveillance, plant security, follow-up of events, licensee actions on previous enforcement items and Licensee Event Report Results:

In the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identifie ~---- ------- -

r 8509260302-85091'9 I

PDR ADOCK 05000280 I

G PDR

  • Persons Contacted Licensee Employees REPORT DETAILS R. F. Saunders, Station Manager D. L. Benson, Assistant Station Manager H. L. Miller, Assistant Station Manager D. A. Christian, Superintendent of Operations E. S. Grecheck, Superintendent of Technical Services J. W. Patrick, Superintendent of Maintenance D. Rickeard, Supervisor, Safety Engineering Staff S. Sarver, Superintendent of Health Physics R. Johnson, Operations Supervisor D. Driscoll, Site Quality Assurance Manager W. R. Runner, Supervisor, Administrative Services Other licensee employees contacted included control room operators, shift technical 'advisors, shift supervisors, chemistry, health physics, plant maintenance, security, engineering, administrative, records, contractor personnel and supervisor.

Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on a biweekly basis with certain individuals in paragraph The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the materials provided to or reviewed by the inspectors during this inspectio.

Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters (Closed) Violation (280/81-22-04), Inadequate Calibration Procedures for Chemical Addition Tank (CAT) Level Instrumentatio The calibration proce-dures were corrected for the proper fluid densities following identification of the proble.

Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspectio.

Operations Units 1 and 2 were inspected and reviewed during the inspection perio The inspectors routinely toured the control room and other plant areas to verify that plant operations, testing and maintenance were being conducted in accordance with the facility Technical Specifications (TS)

and procedure The inspectors verified that monitoring equipment was recording as required, that equipment was properly tagged, and that

  • pl ant housekeeping efforts were adequat The inspectors al so deter-mined that appropriate radiation controls were properly established, that clean areas were being controlled in accordance with procedures, that excess material or equipment was stored properly, and that combustible material and debris were disposed of expeditiousl During tours, the inspectors monitored the pl ant for unusual fluid leaks, piping vibrations, piping hanger and seismic restraint settings, various valve and breaker positions, equipment caution and danger tags, component positions, adequacy of fire fighting equipment and instrument calibration date Certain tours were conducted on backshift Inspections included areas in the Units 1 and 2 cable vaults, vital battery rooms, diesel generator rooms, fire pump house, switchgear rooms, control rooms, auxiliary building, containment and cable penetration areas to verify certain breaker and equipment conditions and positions for safety-related component The inspectors routinely conducted partial walk-downs of emergency core cooling systems and engineered safety features systems to verify operability and observe maintenance and testing of certain equipment*and components in these system The Unit 1 reactor was shutdown early in the reporting period and placed in a cold shutdown condition for a two week maintenance and snubber inspection outag The unit was restarted on August 20, 1985, and operated at power for the remainder of the reporting perio Unit 2 operated at power for the duration of the reporting perio No reactor trips or shutdowns* occurre On August 13, 1985, a Nuclear Instrumentation system dropped rod runback to 50 percent power occurred due to the loss of V1tal Bus I caused by the opening of a 480 volt breaker on the 2Hl bu The Vital Bus (VB) was restored in approxi-mately four minutes by cross-tieing it to VB II The breaker appeared to have opened on overload, but the reason for the overload could not be determine The breaker was reclosed and the systems were returned to normal operation and alignmen The breaker wi 11 be rep 1 aced during the next outage, and inspecte The inspectors verified that the penalty minutes accumulated when the delta flux was out of the band were restored in accordance with TS 3.12.B prior to returning to full-power operatio.

Follow-up of Open Items (Closed) Open Item 280/81-17-02, Rainwater Leak The licensee has had new roofs installed on the majority of buildings on-site, and has*

repaired several sump system (Closed) Open Item 280/83-37-01, Cold Weather Protection Procedure The licensee has reviewed and upgraded the cold weather protection procedure Verification of proper implementation of the procedures will continue under Open Item 280/85-01-0..

'

'..

3 Licensee Event Report (LER) Review The inspectors reviewed the LERs listed below to ascertain that NRC reporting requirements were being met and to determine the appropriateness of corrective actions taken and planne Certain LERs were reviewed in greater detail to verify corrective action and to determine comp 1 i ance with TS and other regulatory requirement The review included an examination of logbooks and internal correspondence, a review of Station Nuclear Safety and Operating Committee meeting minutes and discussions with various staff member (Closed) LER 280/85-01 concerned a test signal left in place in 11 8 11 loop RPS channel 2 of overtemperature delta T without the cognizance of operations or instrumentation personne This event was discussed in Inspection Report 280, 281/84-3 (Closed) LER 280/83-21 concerned time delays for emergency bus separation and diesel start for a degraded voltage condition during a Consequence Limiting System (CLS) or Safety Injection (SI) conditio The cause was determined to be component drift of the ti me delay re 1 ays which were subsequently rese (Closed) LER 280/83-26 concerned containment partial air pressure being slightly greater than that stipulated in TS due to rapidly increasing service water temperatur Pressure was reduced and additional guidance was provided to operations personne.

Plant Physical Protection The inspectors verified the following by observation: Gates and doors in Protected and Vital Area barriers were closed and locked when not attende Isolation zones <;iescribed in the physical security plans were not compromised or obstructe Personnel were properly identified, searched, authorized, badged and escorted as necessary for plant access control.