IR 05000275/1979005
| ML16341C924 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 03/20/1979 |
| From: | Morrill P, Sternberg D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML16341C923 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-275-79-05, 50-275-79-5, 50-323-79-03, 50-323-79-3, NUDOCS 7905230640 | |
| Download: ML16341C924 (8) | |
Text
0-U. S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEHENT
~,
\\
50-275/79-05 Report No. 50-323//9-03 Docket No.
REGION V
II License No.
CPPR"39, CPPR-79 gageguarda Greup Licensee Pacific Gas and Electric Company 77 Beale Street San Francisco, California 94106 Facility Name:
Diablo Can on Units
& 2 Inspection at:
Diablo Canyon Site, San Luis Obis o Count I s etio d
t d Ma1ch 6-9 and March 15, 1979 Inspectors:~P.
J.
t bril'l, Reactor Inspector Cal f
~ fgef )r-Date Signed Date Signed Approved By:
gc D.
M.
S rnberg, Chief, Reactor Project Section bl Reacto perations and Nuclear Support Branch SUmmary e
Date Signed Date Signed Ins ection on March 6-9, and
1979 Re ort Nos.
50-275 79-05 and 50-323/79-03
~dd d,
dd P
I PP P
testing, evaluation and verification of test results, IE Circulars and Bulletin-followup, independent inspection, and a tour of the facility.
This inspection involved 31 inspector-hours onsite by one NRC inspector.
Results:
Ho items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
RV Form 219 (
'F905 230'g
-
Y>5( '
~-
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted
- R. Ramsay, Plant Superintendent
- R. Patterson, Supervisor of Operations
- J. Diamonon, Quality Control Supervisor
- J. Shiffer, Power Plant Engineer
- M. Leppke, Quality Assurance Supervisor
"M. Norem, Resident Startup Engineer
- 0, Backeons, Maintenance Supervisor
- 1<. Raymond, Manager of Quality Assurance J.
Hoch, Project Engineer The inspector also talked with and interviewed several other licensee employees, including members of the construction, engi-neering and operations staff and QA organization personnel.
- Denotes those attending the exit interview on March 9, 1979 at the site.
- Denotes those attending the exit interview on March 15, 1979 at the corporate offices.
2.
Prep erational Test Pro ram The inspector examined twelve Unit 1 preoperational test procedu} e packages that have been turned over from the construction organi-zation to the operating organization.
The packages were found to contain the proper documentation of test results review and approval, and resolution of test deficiencies and problems which occurred during the testing phase.
The test results reviewed were as follows:
9.3 12. 2 12. 2 18. 3 28.15 33.1 33.1 Safety Injection System Preoperational Test Containment.'Spray Preoperational Test Addendum No.
(Containment Spray System)
Addendum No.
1 and
(C02 Fire Protection'ystem)
Station Battery Discharge Test Containment Isolation and Spray Initiation Addendum No.
1 and
-
e
-
36.2 37.5-2-Rod Drive Motor Generator Sets Solid System Pressure Control No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
3.
IE Bulletin Circular Followu The information contained in IE Circular Nos.
78-15 and 78-16 was discussed with licensee representatives.
The information provided in the licensee's response to IE Bulletin No'8-06 was verified by the inspector.
Distribution and responsibility for resolution of applicable bulletins and eirculars was discussed with 'licensee representatives at the site and at the corporate office, Circular 78-15 - Checkvalves Fail to Close in Yertical Position:
The inspector verified that, the onsite review committee had evaluated this circular and determined that checkvalve installation at Diablo Units.
1 and 2 was.satisfactory.
(closed)
Circular 78-16 - Limitorque Yalve Actuators:
The inspector determined that the. Operations Supervisor has been assigned the responsibility to write an Administrative Procedure to address the concern of the circular.
(open)
Bulletin 78-06 - Defective Cutler-hammer, Type H Relays With D.C.
Coils:
The inspector determined the installation of replacement relays was partially complete.
(open)
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
4.
Plant Tour The inspector toured the facility and made the following obser-vations:
a.
Unit 1 reactor coolant system was at operating temperature and pressure.
b.
System verification tests of the Unit 1 main steam atmospheric
- relief valves were in progress.
c.
Steam driven auxiliaiy feed pump tests for Unit 1 were in progress.
d.
Construction work associated with the Hosgri seismic modifi-cation, seismic
'scram and security system were in progres e.
Unit 2 systems and components were in a layup status con-sistent with their construction and testing status.
f.
Housekeeping and cleanliness in both Units 1 and 2 appeared consistent with construction activities and applicable fire and safety requirements.
Ho items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
5.
Exit Interview The inspector met with licensee representatives
{denoted in Para-graph 1) on March 9, 1979 at the site and on March 15, 1979 at the corporate offices..
The scope and findings of the inspection were summarized by the inspecto ~(~.
I O.