IR 05000275/1979014

IE Insp Rept 50-275/79-14 on 790514-31.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Preoperational Testing,Environ Protection,Emergency Planning,Testing in Progress & QA for Preoperational Testing

ML16340A499
Person / Time
Site:	Diablo Canyon
Issue date:	06/14/1979
From:	Sternberg D, Thomas Young NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:
Shared Package
ML16340A498	List: IR 05000275/1979014
References
50-275-79-14, NUDOCS 7907270280
Download: ML16340A499 (8)

Text

Report No 50"275/79-14'Docket No.

50-275 U.

S ~

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT

REGION V

License No.

CPPR"39 Licensee:

Pacific Gas and Electric Company 77 Beale Street San Francisco, California 94106 Facility Name:

Diablo Canyon Unit

Safeguards Group Inspection at:

Diablo Canyon Si'te, San Luis Obispo County, California Inspection conducted:

May 14 "

Inspectors: 6 f~ll

0UA/6'.

Young, Jr.

Resi nt Reactor Inspector 4 idge Date Signed Date Signed Approved By:

Sunmary:

D.

M. Sternberg Chief, Reactor Projects Section

Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch Date Signed Date Signed Ins ection on Ma 14-31, 1979 Re ort No. 50-275 79-14

~ll I:

R

1 p

lp

1 1'<<l,pl tour, environmental protection, emergency planning, witnessing of testing in progress and gA for preoperational testing.

This inspection involved 80 inspector-hours onsite by one HRC Resident Inspector.

Results:

Ho items of noncompliance or deyiations were identified.

RV Form 219 (2)

(

DETAILS Persons Contacted

• R. D.

Ramsay, Plant Superintendent

'R.

D. Etzler, Project Superintendent

• M. H.

Norem, Resident Startup Engineer

• M. E.

Leppke, gA Supervisor

• J. S.

Diamonon, gC Supervisor

• J.

M. Gisclon, Power Plant Engineer

• D. A. Backons, Supervisor of Maintenance

• R. Patterson, Supervisor of Operations R. Richardson, Sr.

Engineer Technician (DER)

The inspector also talked with and interviewed a number of other licensee employees including members of general construction, the operations staff and gA organization personnel.

• Denotes those attending the exit interview.

Plant Tour The inspector walked through various areas of the plant on a weekly basis to observe activities in progress; to inspect the general state of cleanliness, housekeeping and adherence to fire protection rules; to check the proper approval of "man on the line, caution and clearance" tags on equipment; and to review with operations personnel the status of various systems in the plant.

The inspector noted that the status of the systems and the house-keeping appeared consistent with construction activities.

The reactor cavity has been cleaned to core loading standards and designated as a clean area so that workers must dress-out to enter the cavity.

Extra personnel are still assigned to cleanup crews and the cleanlinesss of the plant is still improving.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

Environmental Protection The inspector witnessed the collection of broccoli samples from a farm at Cal Poly and lettuce samples from a farm in the Arroyo Grande area.

The inspector also accompanied personnel to collect milk samples from the Cal Poly dairy and from a second dairy on the Nippomo Mesa.

Soil and water samples were taken from Diablo Creek.

All samples were packed and shipped to the Department of Engineering Research Laboratories for analysis.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identifie.

Emer enc Pl annin The lesson plan and video tape for the general employee emergency training w'ere examined by the inspector.

The inspector verified that the training outline and procedures were adhered to and that the instructor and video tape were effective in providing the desired training.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

5.

Prep erational Test Pro ram Controls The inspector verified by record review and/or observation that (a)

jurisdictional controls were being observed for system turnover, (b) tagging was being accomplished consistent with jurisdictional controls of the administrative procedures and (c) controls were being observed prior to and subsequent'to testing.

A schedule for preoperational testing is being maintained and updated when necessary.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

6.

Prep erational Testin A

The inspector examined all gA audit reports of preoperational testing audits conducted within the last three months.

The in-spector verified that the audits were conducted in accordance with approved procedures and that corrective actions for all identified discrepancies had been taken.

System turnover from construction to-the startup test group and to the operations division was conducted in accordance with established procedures and administrative controls.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

7.

Preo erational Testin a.

Portioris of the following safety-related tests were witnessed by the inspector:

28.20 Temperature Monitoring System 31.2A1 Security Inverter Aux Inputs and Outputs 33.1A3 Retest. Motor 0/C Bypass Aux Relays 26.1.1A3 Blow N to Containment After Relocation of Regula(or 8830

-3-b.

Nhile witnessing the above testing, the inspector verified that the procedures were technically adequate; the ')atest revisions were available and approved; the overall crew performance was adequate; and in the case of completed tests, the acceptance criteria were met.

Administrative controls for design change and documentation were followed.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

8.

Exit Interview The inspector met with a senior licensed representative on a weekly basis and with the representatives denoted in Paragraph 1 on June l.

1979.

The scope and findings of the inspection were summarized by the inspecto III V

A (

h I,

't,