IR 05000275/1979008
| ML16340A456 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 04/13/1979 |
| From: | Sternberg D, Thomas Young NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML16340A455 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-275-79-08, 50-275-79-8, NUDOCS 7905290152 | |
| Download: ML16340A456 (8) | |
Text
U. S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AHD EHFORCEi~fEHT.
REGION V
Report No.
50-275/79-08 Docket No.
50-275 License Ho.
CPPR-39 Safeguards Group Licens e:
Pacific Gas and Electric Com an 77 Beale Street San Francisco, California 94106, Facility Name:
Diablo Canyon Unit
Inspection at:
Diablo Canyon Site, San Luis Obispo County,'alifornia Inspection.Condu I
Inspectors:
T.
February 25 - March 16, 1979 I
oung, Jr.,
Re dent Reactor Inspector
'
'l7 Date Soigne Approved By:
'
bl (
D.
. Sternber
,
hief, Reactor Proje ts Sqction 1, Reactor. Operations and Nuclear Date S>gne g7 Date Signe Summary:
Support Branch Ins ection on, Februar 25 - March 16, 1979 (Re ort Ho. 50-275 79-08 Areas Ins ected:
Routine inspection of preoperational testing, plant tour, wltnesssng of system verification testing and other testing in progress, review of ATMS procedures, and fuel storage.
This inspection involved 80 inspector hours onsite by one NRC resident inspector.
Results:
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
V905390>58 IE:V'Form 219 (2)
DETAILS Per sons Contacted R.
D.
Ramsay, Plant Superintendent R.
D. Etzler, Project Superintendent
- H. 5.
Norem, Resident Startup Engineer
- l1. E. Leppke, gA Supervisor
- J. S.
Diamonon, gC Supervisor
- R. Patterson, Supervisor of Operations
- J. H. Gisclon; Power Plant Engineer
- D. A. Backons, Supervisor of tlaintenance C. A. Hemstock, Cleanup Crew Foreman
The inspector also talked with and interviewed a number of other 'licensee employees, including members of general construction, the operations staff
'nd gA organization personnel.
- Denotes those attending the exit interview.
New Fuel Stora e
The new fuel storage and security was inspected.
The inspector verified that the integrity of the security controls were-being maintained and adequate procedures were available and enforced.
En'vironmental protec-
. tion to control dust and debris, and to prevent fuel damage was being maintained.
The inspection ascertained that the requirements of the special nuclear materials license were being met.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
P Plant Tour The inspector walked through various areas of the plant on a weekly basis to observe activities in progress; to inspect the general state of clean-liness, house keeping and adherence to fire protection rules; to check the proper approval of "man on the line, Caution and Clearance" tags on equipment; and to review with operators the status of various systems in the plant.
The inspector noted that the status of the systems and the housekeeping appeared consistent with construction activities.
During this whole report period, extra personnel have been assigned to the cleanup crews and cleanliness of the plant is being greatly improved.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identifie (D
-2-t 4.
Antici ated Transients Without Scram ATllS The following revised emergency procedures were examined by the inspector for technical adequacy and for compliance with the FSAR.
OP-4, Loss of Electrical Power OP-5, Reactor Trip OP-15, Loss of Feedwater Flow These procedures were revised to include specific warnings of the passibility of an ATllS event and to provide instructions for operator actions to miti-gate the affects of an ATHS.
The procedures appear to be adequate to meet their intended, purpose.
Training in the use of these revised procedures is ongoing.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
5.
S stem Verification Testin SVT a.
b.
SYT was continued through out the duration of this inspection.
All subsystems and/or components which have had corrective maintenance and/or modifications have been retested to.assure their operability.
In addition, a number of surveillance tests were performed.
Follow-ing is a list of surveillance tests witnessed, in part, by the inspector.
M-9J, Diesel Trip and Reload N-98, Diesel 24 Hour Load Test M-13B,.Auto Transfer to Diesel Bus F
M-9A, DG Routine Surveillance Test M-9B, DG Overspeed Trip Test M-69, Steam Generator Safety Valve Setting of Lift Points on Steam Mhile witnessing the above testing, the inspector verified that:the procedures were technically adequate; the latest revisions were available and approved; the overall crew performance was adequate and the acceptance criteria were met or problem reports were filed.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
6.
Preo erational Testin a.
'Portions of the following tests were witnessed by the inspector:
3.7, Turbine Driven AFl< Pump Performance Demonstration 8.4.4, Boron Concentration Measurement System
-3-37.10 Steam Dump Performance Demonstration 37.12A-l, Retest AFW Level Control Valves 37.4A-1, RCS Thermal Expansion Test 37.20, Control Room Inaccessability 37.27, Dedicate Shutdown Instrument Panel 37.15A-l, Pressurizer Level Control b.
While witnessing the above testing (in some tests only parts of the tests were being performed or redone),
the inspector verified that the procedures were technically adequate; the latest revisions were available and approved; the overall crew performance was adequate and, in the case of completed tests, the acceptance criteria were met.
Administrative controls for design change and documentation were followed.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
7.
Exit Interview The inspector met with a senior licensee representative on a weekly basis and with the respresentatives denoted in Paragraph
on March 16, 1979.
The scope and findings of the inspection'were summarized by the inspector.