IR 05000275/1979027
| ML16340A788 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 01/10/1980 |
| From: | Sternberg D, Thomas Young NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML16340A787 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-275-79-27, 50-323-79-14, NUDOCS 8002200348 | |
| Download: ML16340A788 (6) | |
Text
U. S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT REGION V
50-275/79-27 eport No 50-323/79-14 Docket No.
'icense No.
'ifeguards Group Pacific Gas and Electric Company 77 Beale Street San Francisco, California 94106 Diablo Canyon Units 1 & 2 Facility Name:
Diablo Canyon Site, San Luis Obispo County, California Inspection at:
December 1-28, 1979 Inspection conducted:
Inspectors:
T. Young, Jr.,
eside Re tor Inspector I > 5lo ate Signed Date Signed Appi oved by:
l lg Summary:
D. M. Sternberg, Chic, actor Projects Section jP1 Date Signed Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch/
Ins ection of December 1-28 1979 Re ort 50-275/79-27
-~l>>.
Areas Ins ected:
Routine inspection of preoperationsl testing, plant tour, fuel storage, road paving in SLO-2 area and witnessing of testing in progress.
This inspection involved 48 inspector-hours onsite by one NRC resident. inspector.
ResuLts:
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
80pssp p IE:V Form 219 (?)
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted R.
D. Ramsay, Plant Superintendent R.
D. Etzler, Project Superintendent
&. N. Norem, Resident Startup Engineer
- C. M. Seward, Acting QA Supervisor
- J. S. Diamonon, QC Supervisor
- J. M. Gisclon, Power Plant Engineer
- D. A. Backons, Supervisor of Maintenance
- R. Patterson, Supervisor of Operations The inspector also talked with and interviewed a number of other licensee employees including members of general construction, the operations staff and QA personnel.
- Denotes those attending the exit interview.
2.
Plant Tour The inspector walked through various areas of the plant on a weekly basis to observe activities in progress; to inspect the general state of cleanliness, housekeeping and adherence to fire protection rules; to check the proper approval of "man on the line, caution and clearance" tags on eauipment; and to review with operations personnel the status of various systems in the plant.
The inspector noted that the status of the systems and the housekeeping appeared consistent with construction activities.
The reactor cavity is still being maintained as a clean area and extra personnel are still assigned to cleanup crews.
Cleanliness and housekeeping of the plant is still improvin No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
3.
Pavin of Roads in SLO-2 Area The inspector witnessed, on a dialy basis, the paving of the roads located to the north of the Diablo Canyon Creek bed.
The area was identified by Roberta Greenwood in her 1978 report "Surface Survey and Evaluation, SLO-2 at Diablo Canyon,"
as containing cultural resourse information.
Paving was applied only to existing roads and no off-road traffic was noted by the inspector in the SLO-2 area identified by Greenwood.
Very little cut and fillactivities was noted.
Rock, soil and sand base overlay was applied to the road bed before paving with asphalt.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identifie.
New Fuel Stora e
Units 1 & 2 The new fuel storage and security was inspected.
The inspector verified that the integrity of the security controls were being maintained and adequate procedures were available and enforced.
Environmental protection to control dust and debris, and to prevent fuel damage was being maintained.
The inspection ascertained that the requirements of both special nuclear materials licenses were being met.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
5..
Preo erational Testin a.
Portions of the following tests were wi.tnessed by the inspector:
23.10A3 The Purge System Flow Alarms 34.1 Fuel Transfer System Functional Test b.
While witnessing the above testing (in some tests only parts of the tests were being performed or redone),
the inspector verified that the procedures were technically adequate; the latest revisions were available and approved; the overall crew performance was adequate and, in the case of completed tests, the acceptance criteria were met.
Administrative controls for design change and documentation were followed.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
6.
Exit Interview The inspector met with a senior licensee representative on a weekly basis and with the representatives denoted in Paragraph 1 on December 28, 1979.
The scope and findings of the inspection were summarized by the inspecto c