IR 05000259/1981011

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Safety Insp Repts 50-259/81-11,50-260/81-11 & 50-296/81-11 on 810421-24.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Status of IE Bulletins,Nondestructive Exam,Welding & Observation of Inservice Insp Work
ML18025B523
Person / Time
Site: Browns Ferry  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 05/11/1981
From: Girard E, Herdt A
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML18025B522 List:
References
50-259-81-11, 50-260-81-11, 50-296-81-11, NUDOCS 8105270507
Download: ML18025B523 (8)


Text

~PS RKCI (4

~o A.,o Cy e~0

+w*w+

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION II

101 MARIETTAST., N.W., SUITE 3100 ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30303 Report Nos. 50-259/81-11, 50-260/81-11 and 50-296/81-11 Licensee:

Tennessee Valley Authority 500A Chestnut Street Chattanooga, TN.

37401 Facility Name:

Browns Ferry Docket Nos.

50-259, 50-260 and 50-296 License Nos.

DPR-33, DPR-52 and DPR-68 Inspection at B owns Ferry site near Decatur, Alabama Inspect

~

~

E.

H. Girard WA'

Date Approved by:

A.

R. Herdt, Section Chief, EI Branch Division of Engineering and Technical Inspection SUMMARY Inspection on April 21-24, 1981 Areas Inspected vuPi Dat This routine, unannounced inspection involved 28 inspector-hours onsite in the areas of status of IE Bulletins (Units 1, 2, and 3), nondestructive examination (Units 1, 2, and 3), welding (Units 1, 2, and, 3)

and observa-tion of inservice inspection work (Unit 1).

Results No violations or deviations were identifie l C

+ 'E~

i

DETAILS Persons Contacted Licensee Employees

  • H. L. Abercrombie, Plant Manager
  • J.

E. Swindell, Outage Supervisor

  • R. Smith, gA Supervisor
  • C. Rozear, Lead gA Engineer J. Nebrig, Modification Coordinator J.

Savage, Project Engineer

  • R. Seals, Inservice Inspection Coordinator NRC Resident Inspector J.

Chase

  • Attended exit interview Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on April 24, 1981 with those persons indicated in Paragraph 1 above.

Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.

Unresolved Items Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required to determine whether they are. acceptable or may involve noncompliance or deviations.

A new unresolved item identified during this inspection is discussed in paragraph 7.c.

Status of IE Bulletins (IEBs) (8nits 1, 2, and 3)

(Closed)

IEB 259, 260, 296/80-BU-21:

Valve Yokes Supplied by Malcolm Foundry Company, Inc.

The licensee's response letter for this bulletin, dated December 5, 1980, has been received and reviewed by NRC Region II.

The letter response indicates that the licensee has determined that they do not have any valve parts cast by Malcolm Foundry in any active valves in the three Browns Ferry units.

The bulletin is considered closed based on this response.

Within the area examined, no violations or deviations were identifie Nondestructive Examination (Units 1, 2 and 3)

The inspector reviewed licensee penetrant examination procedures utilized for maintenance and modification work for compliance with applicable code and regulatory requirements.

The licensee identified three penetrant examination procedures as applicable to their main-tenance and modification work: (1) NPT-NC-1 RI; (2} BF-PT-1 RO, and (3) N-PT-2 RO.

The applicable code identified to the work was USAS B31. 1-1967.

The inspector examined the three procedures for proper approval as well as reviewing procedure BF-PT-1 RO for technical adequacy.

Within the areas examined no violations or deviations were identified.

7.

Welding (Units 1, 2 and 3)

The inspector examined the licensee's controls and procedures for maintenance and modification welding of safety related systems to determine compliance with applicable code and regul'atory require-ments.

The code applicable to this welding is USAS B31. 1-1967.

The areas examined by the inspector are as follows:

a.

Welding Procedures The inspector reviewed the licensee's procedures for gas tungsten arc welding and shielded metal arc welding, as contained in Browns Ferry procedure N73H2 (3/30/81), for compliance with the applicable code.

b.

Welding Material Control The inspector reviewed the licensee's controls on welding materials to determine the adequacy of storage, handling and disbursement.

The licensee's procedural requirements for these controls are contained in the licensee's procedures N73M2, HAI-12 and MAI-21.

Implementation of the procedural requirements was observed at the issue stations.

C.

Welder Performance gualifications fhe inspector reviewed the performance qualification records of three welders to determine compliance with applicable code requirements.

In addition, the inspector verified maintenance of welding qualifications for the three welders through a

review of welding material issue records.

The inspector found that the licensee did not have a procedure which described the method being used to track maintenance of welder qualification and that cognizant licensee personnel did not appear to fully understand how maintenance of qualification was to be assured.

This lack of procedural requirements is identified as unresolved item 50-259, 260, 296/81-11, Lack of Procedure for Maintenance of Welder gualifications.

No instances of failure to comply with code requirements for proper maintenance of welder quali-fications were identified by the inspecto c

~'~i'

Within the areas examined, no violations or deviations were identified.

8.

Inservice Inspection - Observation of Work and Work Activities (Unit 1)

The NRC inspector observed performance of ultrasonic examination activities for inservice inspection (ISI) of reactor vessel nozzle to flange weld N-6A.

The activities were observed for compliance with code and regulatory requirements.

The code applicable to this work is ASME Section XI (71 S 71).

The inspector observed only the longitudinal wave portion of the UT examination.

The examination was observed to verify availability of approved procedure (N-UT-1 R4), personnel knowledgeable in the 'examination method, proper recording of results and conformance with procedure technical requirements (apparatus, coverage, scanning rate, calibration, search unit size and frequency, beam angle, DAC curve, reference level and recording methods).

Within the areas examined, no violations or deviations were identifie * ~.'

L

~

~~o