IR 05000254/1997012

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Repts 50-254/97-12 & 50-265/97-12 on 970707-16.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Review of Plant Support Activities Re Physical Protection of Facility & Corrective Actions to Security Issues
ML20151J640
Person / Time
Site: Quad Cities  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 07/31/1997
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20151J633 List:
References
50-254-97-12, 50-265-97-12, NUDOCS 9708050210
Download: ML20151J640 (2)


Text

.__ . - _ . -. -- . . . .-- _~ -- . . - . - . . -

- .

)

, i l U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

<

REGION lli

Docket Nos: 50-254; 50-265

Licenses No
DPR-29; DPR-30 l

i

Reports No
50-254/97012(DRS); 50-265/97012(DRS)

1

] Licensee: Commonwealth Edison Company (Comed)

l, Facility: Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2

!

Location: 22710 206th Avenue North

Cordova, IL 61242

!

!

Dates: Between July 7 and 16,1997

) l

Inspector: T. Madeda, Physical Security inspector l

J Approved by: James R. Creed, Chief, Plant Support Branch 1 i Division of Reactor Safety l

EnclD# 1CS

. . . .

e le Dooan W M 9708050210 970731 PDR ADOCK 05000254 G PDR

e EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ouad Cities Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 NRC Inspection Reports 50-254/97012; 50-265/97012 This inspection included a review of plant support activities related to the physical protection of your facility. The report reviewed the effectiveness of licensee corrective actions to security issues, verified the performance of protected and vital area security equipment, evaluated alarm station (s) and security communication activities, and follow-up on previc 's inspection findings. The inspection was conducted between July 7 and 16,199 *

Security performance was effective. Security force members demonstrated an appropriate working knowledge of security requirements. Management support for security requirements regarding staffing, training activities, and maintenance of security equipment was sound. Security management's actions to address and 'ssolve problems were timely and effectiv *

Security computer replacement project was completed in a timely and effective manner. No significant problems were identified. (Section S2.1)

The practice of starting your random and varied patrols at designated times limits their effectiveness. (Section S3.1)

The establishment and implementation of a program to reduce security force I personnel errors was a strength. Errors related to security force performance have been significantly reduced. (Section S4.1) l l

fRN

- Duocotro2 M