IR 05000254/1993002

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Partially Withheld Physical Security Insp Repts 50-254/93-02 & 50-265/93-02 on 930104-08 (Ref 10CFR73.21).No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Alarm Stations & Communications, Power Supply,Testing & Maint & Compensatory Measures
ML20127L176
Person / Time
Site: Quad Cities  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 01/21/1993
From: Creed J, Madeda T
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20127L165 List:
References
50-254-93-02, 50-254-93-2, 50-265-93-02, 50-265-93-2, NUDOCS 9301270036
Download: ML20127L176 (2)


Text

.

_

_.

.

-

-

.

,,

'

x

- 1 Le

?

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION III

Reports No. 50-254/93002(DRSS); 50-265/93002(DRSS)

'

!-

Docket Nos. 50-254; 50-265 Licenses No. DPR-29; DPR-30 Licensee:

Commonwealth Edison Opus West 111 1400 Opus Place Downers Grove, IL 50515 Facility Name:

Quad Cities Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 Inspection Dates:

January 4-8, 1993 Type of Inspection:

Routine Physical Security Date of Previous Physical Security Inspection:

September 14-18, 1992

-

^1 i

Inspector:

Aw tom /#

bb d93 Terry f. fiadeda Date '

'

Physical / Security Inspector max.

b kk-Approved By: ' James R. Creed, Chief

/

.

._.

f Date Safeguards Section laspection Summary

'Jnsp_qction on_danuar_; g i d 3 (Reports No. 50-154/93002 M SSl;.

5.0_-365 /93002 (DRSS H -

areas Insoerd.eJJ:

Routine, announced physical security inspection involving:-

. Alarm Stations and Communications; Power Supply; Testing,. Maintenance and.

_

Compensatory Measures; Security Training and Qualification; Followup to

-

Previous Inspection Findings and review of several aspects of licensee investigation to AMS-RIII-92-A-Oll5.

Resu_lh: The licensee was_found to be in compliance with NRC requirements within the areas examined. All previcus' inspection: findings were closed. _ WE.

determined the licensee's _ investigation to AMS-RIII-92-0115 was sufficient _and -

we had no additional questions regarding this matter.

-

c Inspection results concluded that the security program was effectively

'

implemented and managed.

Security officers and supervisors demonstrated

-

excellent job knowledge. Training resources, including equipment and; personnel, were ample and the program contributed significantly in supporting the security program. Observation activities and record reviews showed effective performance.in-the reliability of security equipment. Review of security maintenance records and interviews of cognizant personnel showed a

>

9301270036 930121-,

l

~ ' '&u n n 1 ', m'-

POR ADOCK 05000254 1--

i.

G PDRl

~;'.

. - - m. x.

.

,

e r

w e

-

-

r Y

W W

-

.,

. A

,.

low backlog of security maintenance requests and good timeliness in completing reactive' security maintenance-activities.

P

,

D d

,

+

a.-

..

4'

7.'

' ' :m ' Con %ina I? i --lf dIl ]')

'

'

' "stion Thf3 IU Louentrolled

>

.

.