IR 05000244/1990021
| ML20058E676 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Ginna  |
| Issue date: | 10/24/1990 |
| From: | Dexter T, Keimig R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20058E669 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-244-90-21, NUDOCS 9011070270 | |
| Download: ML20058E676 (9) | |
Text
"
'
-
L
~
c
.
,
~'o
.. - -
,
.
,
.
,
bThiDM MChmma,
.
.
.
Y5
[puan$$dlG.L...-
- ----s JL W)
, <iJ
"
,
ZMrk 4eN. -.- #2[N
g g".:m:,W s );
P M U, S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
j t
r
>
I n;
.\\
<
- Report' No.'-
50-244/90-21 l
,
-
-
t
&,,
Docket No. 50-244
,
--
-
,
i
>
v
- License No.'
OPR-18 '
,
Licensee:
Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation
,
59 EastiAvenue
,
O>
. Rochester, New-York 14649
m
.
,
.
.
-!
Facil1+y:Name:
R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant n#
,
t
,
,
,
.
V LInspection At:';0ntario, New York
,
i i
.
. -
a,
.I'nspection Conducted:
September 10-14, 1990
!
..,. -
i i,I
',
,
,p fry;pd el
~/
~
'
? Inspector:
' y.
3 W., Dexter, Physica1/5ecurity Inspector;
-date-
+ u
'
,
w w
/Ahrovedby: hM[
N vezv 9,
'
s
,lL ?g ?, L _,
p i g R. jeimi b Chi
,, Saf eguards; Secti_on :
- date ~
s
.
_
m
...
v
,
.t
,
-(n f
'
jinspection Summary:q (Routine' UnannouncediPhysical Security-(Inspection -
~
'
3y e
,
m
'ReporttNo. 59-244/90-21)-
M+
m
,
,.
< <
.
i: U :
3{5
!.l 1
,
- ?!Afe'ailnspectedd l0nsit'e FS119w-upcof,Previously Identified Items: 'inagementi Q
- 5upport; Security: Program Plans and Audits; Protected AreaLand ".al Area:
j
,
V Mg. 1 hysical1 Barriers, 0etectionsand Assessment Aids;. Protected 1ano Viti.loArea P
.
J e
? Access.: Control::of, Personnel, Packages'and Vehicles;LAlarm. Stations 2and,
% Communications;SPower Supply;3 esting and! Maintenance an.d Compensatory'
-
- ;
s. * ' Measures;3 and Securi_ty Training and-Qualifications.
.
.
,
m, m1
',
'
N
-
,
M;g,$a J Resu1 M (Thellicensee'_ wast n compliance withINRCLrequirements N the a'reas
,
S
'
i
,
, <
@?%.sj$1nspectedfJHowever,6 potential weaknesses 1 were identifiediin'thel areas;of _ _
d
.
j W M p' Access}Contro11of Personnel and Packages, Vital; Area.-Access Control, Preventive,
<
,*
% *R < Ma@tena'n'ce Procedures,1aad th'eLAudit Program'
'
fiiM a ';
>
,
c.y
Cb
., ;5 j ' [p!
i f
h
,.hf N
.
,
- wa, t h
,
'
r V lil., Q
'
,
,
,
W
,,,
s d!C'. l'
-
/
9011070270 901025
- f em
- "
i i
PDR ADOCK 05000244
"
fl,i W, !"
.
m jf Q
PDC m
'a,
- yn, r_g ;
ly: '
,
,
n
,
\\
~
';q
,\\,
(
<
'
l ghhj -
l v, 0lb, Oi
_,
_
.
,
_
.,
.
-
,
l' ',
'-
si i
.'
'
f; e
_q_
'
,
t
,.
W Details g:
1.
Key Personnel Contacted
.
Licensee and Contractor Personnel
,
,
~ R.IMeeredy, Vice President,- Nuclear Productioi
',
T. Powell', Manager, Risk Management
'
m S
- W. Oillon, Director, Corporate-Security
R. Marchionda -Director, Outage Planning b
R. Wood, Supervisor, Nuclear Security _
- M. Fowler, Security Operations Coordinator
,A R. Teed,. Security Training Coordinator
, _
S. Eckert, Access-Authorization Coordinator.
>
l:.
0.: Leeper, Instrument-and Controls ~ Supervisor e
i K. Laubacher,LPlant Engineer R. Benne, Project Manager _- Wackenhut Corporation
'E. Palmer, Training Supervisor. - Wackenhut Corporation
,
,
_
,
,
,
a U.S. Nuclear' Regulatory Cor. mission (NRC)
^
a
,
n:
am
~V
.
.
K
' %m T.: Moslak, Senior Reside'nt Inspector
.!
-
f
'
'N. Perry',iResident Inspector a
3 y" m c
,
The above: personnel were present at.the_extt" interview. 'Otherisecurity'
-i
'
'
andlplantpersonnelwereinterviewedduringtheinspection.
,
s
/
! 2 '.
- 0. site Follow-uplof PreviouslyJIdentified Items-
~ *
m
&
$ l'f L a ',
'(0 pen) V10. 90-04-01n The: licensee 'was? found in. violation of the
'
'
y NRC-approved Physical L Security Plan _(the Plan)? by; allowing: a -person q
N
.
.C swho:was _ originally)badgedf fori entry into the Protected; Area' (PA) _to'
q
'
y =
{
iexittthe PA:andare-enter without again-passing-throughtthe access T
'
&g W search equipment,' ThisJitem: remains open;sincerthe.' licensee has not
~
'
.
A:"
' completed its iong jterm corrective ' actions',.which include la facility
!?
,fupgrade that wi.1,1 physically cha'nge%the configuration.of the' access j;f
,
s
'
,
,
.
- controlaprocessing equipment, 'This-itemfwill be reviewed during
'
Q subsequent; inspections. ~
'
'
'
.
l
'3.
1 Management Supporti Security Program 11a'ns, and Audits -
%
.
,
,,
,
,
.
q m
,
Bfs
- a.
' Management Support
<
%
.
.
s
'
.
.
_
.
Management 7 support for-:the security program:was apparent fromDthe; Ji,
,
,
]j 7 N.
f progre s bein.gLmade'on program'upgradestand_the continuation'ofilong
?/W.
. term planning.lnAdditionally, the licensee has' increased the2 contract.
>
M security force.by? eighteen personnel to better distributeothe)
ta
.. workload 7tmprove morale,,and increase the number of trained alarm O
stationtoperators.
<
a
,
s
..I,
j oi
,
'
,
'
,'
, )
s c
.. ;
!
V ' usj [k
&
.,.
- j-
- s
,
,_
,
. -.
,
iE,
.
[hj
,
'
.
,
t
,,
u y
h. -'
b.
Security Program Plans
-
The inspector determined that the licensee has had a nuclear security
,
i consultant ctmplete a review and revision to the Plan. The licensee expects _to submit the-revised plan _to the NRC'in late 1990 or early 1991'.
.
g,4 i<
-c.
Audits
.
The _ inspector reviewed the 1990 annual security program audit report-and-verified that:the audit had been conducted in accordance with the
~
.m
. Plan. ' The. audit covered all areas.of the security program and the
?
f, results, were reported to the appropriate -level 5 of management.
The i
inspector's' review included the responses'to the audit findings _and
-
s
,
the corrective action taken to remedy those findings. Based upon G
'
several! performance weaknesses observed by the' inspector during
<
.
this. inspection and there being no such weaknesses identified in the -
-
A
' audit,. i t z appearsithat.the audit was. directed toward compliance
.,
rather;than on performance. 'The licensee committed to ensure that J
'"
? di
- -future' audits will include performance' elements.
This'-item will'be-t
',
reviewed.during subsequent inspections,:
J
'
q
>
sm
- PrStectMiahd. Vita 1AreaPhysicalBarriers, Detection'andAssessment' Aids-
'
'
14.:
'
,,
'
u
,
y
,
- a..
Prot'ected Area Barriers f
- 4, y" ' i t
~
g
,
.The: inspector conducted a physical inspectioncof:the: protected area -'
'0
'
,
(The inspector determined, by
?_.f(PA)barriersoniSeptemberx10,1990u1 observation,Lthat the barriers wereli
'"-
F
>
.
,
%;,,
'
'K '
_
' (' '
edescribed in'the.P_lan. JThe inspector;noted thatithe: licensee hadia
'
'
~
t[ 3 -
l barrier upgrade, program-developed by:aL nuclear l security; consultantf
'
.,1
+
1 sincei theclast security _ inspectioni.. Progress s on thelbarrier~. upgrade-a
- will'be monitoredfduring subsequent"inspectionsk
]
yw 3
,
,
'
'
m'
.1
_
~..
~
,
,
h Protected Area Detection Aids.
l.w-
.i
=
l y
,
} {e s
s 1(
'jy ' b finspector' observed,the PA perimeteridetection; aids on:
1%
.
. September ll, 1990,1and-determined they were: installed,-maintained
- {
~
$4;W-
- p
.and operated as committed tolin the Pla'n. ?During:the' inspector, g.
requested-testingtof;the detection. aids,l thirty-five, locations;within3' -
i
'
V,'..
'
,
'
,
fif teen. zones' were ' tested.1 The inspector, also, verified,eby reviewing J i
fi 4 4.i 4 5
.testingaecords, that the'PA.Intrusio'n Detection System.(IDS) was '
gg W,
7m
..being" tested'as required-in the' Plan. LAddit onally, the inspector l i
C.
!,
f*
verified that thell.icensee hid included certainjportions?of the PA?
a ilDSlin the:PA'. barrier upgrade program.:(NofdeficienciesEwere noted.--
T,
,;(
'
j
'
+
g
'
'
' '
i-
,
,f )
'
s
,
!
..
t k
([
'
,
w
<
.
M,p ',
'
d di 7 ?
>
>
.
-
'
d%:
Rg,i
>
K YhI
!h3 -
(3'
'
l
-
l
,
f
,
..
' & *
f;Q&Y' & ' _- _
'
,,
i,
,
<
,
,
,,
- t;
-
'
-
- 3
.
r
-
,
!
.:..
,
..
.
. - -
'
>
-
n
-
,
..
.
- c.
Isolation Zones
'
.
T The-inspector verified;that the isolation zones were adequately maintained to permit observation of activities on both sides of the
_ PA barrier. No deficiencies.were noted.
>
,,
d,.
' Protected Area and Isolation Zone Lighting Thkinspector conducted a lighting survey of the PA and isolation zones on September 11, 1990.
The inspector determined, by
~
.
observation,'that the lighting program was very ef fective.
However.
- i
.there were many-temporary portable' lighting stands.throughout the PA'
.l
'to compensate:for insufficient lighting.' The licensee has not yet
?
K>
.
developed a plan lto correct.this weakness but intends to address it
'
r
&fter the assessment sids upgrade (described below)11s. completed. No g
'
.
deficiencies were noted.
'
'
o'
.
,,
. Assessment" Aids
-- e.
-
,
i.The inspector.. observed'the-PA perimeter assessment aids and
,
determined.theyl.were generally installed, maintained, and, operated
.
3'
~
,m'1
~
Las1 committed to in.?he Plan'.
,
,
- ' ge %
,y
'
'
g.
,
,
3, (3 ps -
t 4_
-
,
.
g n,
[i S $U.N.h kbb SAFEGl'A! IDS -
.
,
.,,.
,
%
M i
EF0MiTG ED 13 !!0TLFOR PUBi.10 M
RN;.
i 0 SCLOSUP.Ecli IS INTDill0liAl.lY v d
,
<
'1
- tgy gtg.
'
-
,
,,
n
,y p
'#
'
'
ylj.
-
-
1 "r w G:
"
N
.
,
.
&
m
'
<
,
,
mm:
- ,
'
,
,f I
i q q;a
-
,
,
,
,.[r,1
< fi [
.
h@$j
.
2
.f Ii ? '
--
1; Wijk -Q W [f.
LVital' Area-Barriers i
4a
-
,
p,$pn&
m
..
.
.
s
'
...
.
F6>,'
W
- The?inspectorj conducted.a physical ! inspection;oficertain vitallarea
"
.
1;:1 ijf L ' W "
1(VA).barriersLonSeptember 12, 1990. Thesim pector; determined. by;
'
did Lobservation, that(the ' barriers were installed'and maintained as4
" !N
'
>
d ' Md
'
committed to in the Plan'.No deficiencies were noted;
<d
@JC a
' y;. ',e
.i
"
'
.q g" '
,
- -
,
m
,
,W, n;.-
i
>
'
,
- .
<>
,
,
,
.'/ (., y $
j j
\\
,t
yy w
.
- i; r
W
e
>
..
,
,i Q,
.0;
!
!
t
,.
,
'
w ail ' ,4 ,
\\ r , ' L d!M ' ; 7g, s g y ;;n 1, j[ a, ay .. ... .. ... 4,
, y - . . . . . _ . ? :.a .i ) j
u n-
4;
- f.
< >'e e $. q a' '. , , . - g.
. Vital Area Detection Aids < l? . . . i , B The_ inspector observed the VA detection aids and determined that ' ' ' N they were generally installed, maintained and operated as committed , b-to1in the Plan.
, l t
> r TH15 PARAGRAPli CONTAINS SAFEGLUDS O I!dOEAlla DiD 13 HDI FOR Pl%LIC
[} f.i DISCLD$llP.E, IT IS lhTENTIONAll.Y > I ,IN 1.EIT BLAMX.
% , W - ,
5
~ + 5 ' Protected and Vital Area-Access-Control of Personnel, Packages.
- and Vehicles
g<g ~ . he .a', - $Pershrinel ' Acces's.'Contro_1,[ n ,
, o , f.', The ; inspector determi.ned 'that the '~ licensee was exercising positive' l , control over personnel access:to the'PA and'VAs.
This. determination F 'F " gb was based on the following:- > . . j W .. The inspector. verified, by;observationp that personnel are r > . . --" l i w, 11):'. properly) identified, and, authorization.is checked prior to ,H .T , f ' i a... l issuance 1of badges 5andikey-cards. : No: deficiencies were noted.
' , , , t
s w, I w L2)l [The inspector [ verified thatlthe licensee ca~ program toD. _ ( ' ( W . con fi rm.1 the-t rus two rthi ne s s" a nd J rel i abil of employees and , contractor lpersonpli LNoideficiencies% e. noted.
i >!bc
M ' '3);. The11'nspectorfveri fied Et hat Dthe clicensee - takes ' precautions. to - ' [', ensure that'an?unauthorizedin'ameJcannot be added to the-access - - list byihavingia memberLofima ngement reviewithe list 4 every 31 -
- e
a " "; days. Noldeficiencie siwere :noted.o H
i ' ' ' , , ' " MW> a " 7o. L ~ < ., Theninspector; verified-th' t"theMiikenseeihas.a ; search Lprogram,lasi . .s (M%, 1. 4) a , , ' n j ' ' committedito in the Plan ~, Lforifirearms',D explosives, incendiary ; P ', @g &l4 ,- devicesf and other 'unautho. tzed materials.'iThe. inspector ~ .; , , .. NgW l observed plant"personne11and visitor access. processing 7several !
M ?
- ,'
- times duringi the LinspectionL andL interviewed ' members; of) the - , Wib i securityiforce and! theflicensee's: securit' istaf f re'garding' y N;s 3 personnel; access' procedures.
' , . ' ! \\ N , , ' on a j!' '_]? [, // g,%, C 0!,- i ' [i" , lf g, k -. , { , ..-- ,~. '5 , e , s & ./ . :. . . ' >
== _ L = - .
' _ THIS PARAGRAPH CDMAINS SAFEGUARDS MORMAll0N AND IS NOT FDR PUBLIC g DISCL0SURE, IT IS IUMl0NAlly L LEFT BLANK.
b _.
b.
Package Access Control The inspector determined that the licensee was exercising positive control over hand-carried items that are brought into the PA via the main access control building.
The inspector reviewed the procedure, - GS 28.0, Search of Personnel and Packages, and found it consistent _ with commitments in the Plan.
No deficiencies were noted, c.
Vehicle Access Control - The inspector determined that the licensee properly controls access to and within the PA.
The inspector verified that vehicles are properly processed prior to entering the PA. The process was - consistent with commitments in the Plan. The inspector also reviewed the vehicle search procedures and determined they were consistent with commitments in the Plan.
This determination was
== made by observ g vehicle processing and search, inspection of vehicle logs, and by interviewing members of the security force and
i licensee's security staff about vehicle processing and search procedures. No deficiencies were noted.
-- 6.
Alarm Station and Communications The inspector observed the operations of the Central Alarm Station (CAS) -- and the Secondary Alarm Str. tion (SAS) and determined that they were ' maintained and operated as committed to in the Plan. CAS and SAS operators were interviewed by the inspector and found to be knowledgeable of their duties and responsibilities.
The inspector verified that the EF
- - .. . .. .. ........ .. _. _... _ _.. _.......... _. _ _ _
DQ . i .
[n,.
e ] .; .
[ . .
" CAS and SAS do not contain any operational activities that would interfere with the' assessment and response functions.
No deficiencies , ' were_noted._
- 7.
_ Emergency Power Supply J I The inspector verified that there are several systems (batteries, >
- dedicated diesel generator within a VA, and plant on-site AC power) that
. provide backup' power to the security systems. The inspector reviewed the
test and maintenance records and prot.edures for-these systems and found ithat they were consistent with the Plan.
No deficiencies were noted.- I ' g - Testing'. Maintenance and Compensatory Measures 8.; i . . 'l" ? 'The inspector-reviewed ter. ting and maintenance records and confirmed that l the records committed to in the Plan were on file and readily~available r > for review. LThe station uws experienced instrumentation and controls o , ' p> (I&C) technicians:to maintain and test any security equipment that . L, ' requires preventive or-corrective maintenance. ' A check of-repair ' records 1 indicated that corre-+ive mn vtenance and testing.are being accomplished in~ + l1 ' s , the i m pector noted that, while preventive y ~ a, timely manner. % ' w maintenance.was-b .. e is9 d in accordance with the frequency V7 _, "_ requirements of.Proceoure w 4030,.a formal; schedule-had not been . Jdeveloped to enable tracking'its; accomplishment at that required. . , y frequency;- as Estated -in =A;1030. - Additionally, the procedure 1 requires the . E
- Security Supervisor..or.'his designee, to monitor
- implementation of the,
'f ,
j preventivejmaintenance; program.- The inspectorL pointed outl that without - l
O a'n issued schedule, neither 1&C nor; Security:can ensure that the a preventiveimaintenanceLisLbeingiconductedLastrequired. The licensee: , agreed landLcommittedito develop and issue a schedul_e to, ensure proper
' c ' , program implementation; Thisswill be reviewed curing sub' sequent h W, ' inspections.
' t' ^ !". - .. . . ~ i ' < ' h .w LThe' inspector alsol reviewed.theLlicensee's use of= compensatory security.
J ' measures ~ ? .the Plan;and) determined that'they;were being implemented as committed to ' L: ', fNo deficiencies wereinoted.
> , 3- . .. . .. y y , > , e 19. ' o security; Training and Qualification
' '
u
- [ %
'y m , L uring the; inspection (severali security _ of ficersL(S0s)Uwere interviewed to; J f ' D ' - Idetermineiif theyfpossessed the requisite knowledge _ and. ability tot carry .e, f < ' ? ,; . L;, c out their ' assigned: duties.
The: interview results indicated that Lthey. > r TYW fwere. professional 1and) knowledgeable of:theirl ob requirements as.
n Jcontainedlin thesformal' training program
- Notdeficiencies were'noted.
W ,,j&"9 '
p , s The inspector' randomly selected and reviewed the: training'and qualifica- _.
~ " M L Jtion records.for'10 S0s.
Their. physicalcand' firearms qualification records ,f =were:also inspected. The records'. selected included supervisory personne?. !
gr n ^ Mm j f , r a < % c h ,, , .s ', !.. - - n
y s ',s i ' t >
- .
, }
! g '
- t
, g;n rn ..', 4 0. ,, _, ,
- . m f c 8
) >
U, ' " " , ,, !) --
- 6 1,s.
w- . g n., ,;1 .I '
.
f' . Nofdeficiencies were noted. However, the inspector determined, from ' interviewing.the security: training coordinator, that theLtraining coordi- 'nator had no' mechanism to incorporate lessons learned during program .i y implementation into the formai lesson plans.
For example, lessons learned ' r , . were being incorporated into security procedures, but no changes were made- -l
33 s .to the lesson plans, although the training on lessons. learned was being >
- accomplished through on-the-job; training. While this method is effective,
'4> . i e , it-does not ensure that consistency will be achieved on' a long term basis,'
'nor that'new S0s will-receive that training.- The licensee has committed _
- to correct this weakness. This will
- be reviewed during subsequent
, > A
- i n specti on s.' :
t i-q.- ,N 10.i _E_x.i t-- Intervi ew The inspector met.witt, the licensee' representatives indicated in ' i , ..
paragraph i'at the conclusion of the inspection on September 14,'1990.
. " .At that time, the purpose and scope of the inspection were.. reviewed and.
- t the findings were present.ed. The licensee's commitments, as documented
,
m.
, in this, report, weretreviewed and confirmed with the licensee,
- '
. 17.y< < I ' i.
b i t.. ' ,3 , , + y_ ,; , , It ., %- , * t L. ' '!:7? - f ' {; . ~ ]l , , Mi
- q n o,, ..i N %g"' - g-w L',Ql;
- r
,y - , ., -, c7'- .) '
a y Jh i '. 2 . . % < n; . i
, - , h' , f j,,, I i g i , ' (it q,( t , , , -,. -
i'} i i Jg'.l ' u pn ' s i
SLk '. 4 0 z,, 5 ...
- JN.:
g, ' NI~$ l't n,. ' ihi[h.l{',;[ , ' i @, j dj ' '
- )
- 6ldj., l I,h hh , , , ,4.,,+ l. i
.5
l,l... t ' I g ' . :4 i ,.d[,Si,'; '. 3 g l
y., c , .. t ,t j .I 5 E ' ' 'W. y ch,.. _;, ; _t t?, l.
- ' ,w < .. , - . g .. < > , M0c ;ga, n l fhd id Y - , , ,, , , , d ,
a , 3
- -=c fy y ; 39 =333 3 ;f._
- -~
qa:;--- --- - -- ------- - - - . - w:
- .4 h p.; ,j ' <?DP " [; W ; '.u ^ ~ jU*
' C _ _ _ 33; . ~ fiw w:.. Q w-
- - 3
- ; - -
.g m?= - ~ N - e:O -~ ~ 90UTSTAfEINGi1TEMS FILE SINGLE DOCKET ENTRY FORMy - -c ~ .- 'H - - .4 - m . , .g i - ~ - . ~ _ LREPORT HOURS 1.cOperatiens? 17.70utages? . _j 2R Rad-Con 18 Training;. 8 0- . 3.iMaintenancef
- 9.JLicensing Docket-No.
A ly-K l
- [
. -4.-Surveillance' - '10. QAM M 5.1.Emerg. Prep.- L11[Other?~ . .. Originator-T. M DEXTER - t 6 Sec/Safegrds. m ~ 12.; Fire: Protection /. g,,9,,9,g Supervisor OL de m ic, Housekeeping _ .; g 'l Action DueDate b Clsout Rpt/ Date 0/M/Clsd ~f Item Number Type-iSALP Area-Area = s t-A d-6=M-Ic i t i - -lvlelol 15 ldchid t h k l I l~ leisipl- -l l-1-1 1 1-1 -I i - 191ol-l/ lcl-1 l l l l 1-1 I l-1 1 1 ! - ~ Ori!1inatof/ Modifier _) - TResp Sec~ 4 , MM-D D Y Y.
MM D D- .Y Y -
s~ n._. _ .i ' 10 fc l x-T lc le ic l-
i-l 'l I i Descriptive Title -; F-'A-i L; O 9. l E 'l T lc lC ol*JlO10 c H T I- ' I s lE le l EL i t_.
R o if "& P lE l' et ! J d id N E I I.- l - 1 I ~I ' j E-e.l T s c r N
i7 H E- ' ~ l f R. l c T E lc_ l r E' i n i iA R G A1 I l l l l l' l
I l-l l
l- -l l-l-
I ll L
I Il i L
1
I i ~1 j . q Item Number Type- 'SALP Area Area Action Due Date ..Updt/Cisout Rpt/ Date 0/M/Clsd I l l 1-1 l 1-1 l 1 I l -l l l l 1 1 1 1;l l l i l l 1-1 l l l-l I l-l I l i l 1-1 i 1-1 l l l l l-l l'l-1 1 l' I MM DD-YY MM DD YY j Originator / Modifier Resp-Sec ., I i l i I I i l' l 1 -1 I l- . .-
Descriptive Title [
1 rl' l l l C V , l
! .[
l l t-r t.
c 1 1 1-' I l-l 1 i lIii . -SALP. Area Area-Action Due Date Updt/C1sout Rpt/ Date 0/M/Cisd-l ' Item Number Type 1-l i I l-1-1 1 l~l i Illi I I l-l I l-l i I 'l I l-l I l-l I L i 1 1-1 I l-1-1 l i ' MM-D D YY MM DD YY [ Of..nator/ Modifier.
~ . Resp Sec j i l-i j i i l l ~l 'l l-l-
i Descriptive Title I ___ i
-- l l l' l! i
-l l I l l ' I '~ I I
l-
l l-I l-1 I i
i H t - , i Regic'n'I Form 6 - no (April 1987) ~ h
- 4
' '[' _ _ } c __- -- a- -- - = = =. - = .- -- - - - - }}