IR 05000237/1991037

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Mgt Meeting Insp Repts 50-237/91-37 & 50-249/91-40 on 911112.Major Areas Discussed:Causes of Recent Facility Events,Including Implementation of Mgt Expectations, Communications & Procedural Adherence
ML17174B038
Person / Time
Site: Dresden  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 12/06/1991
From: Burgess B
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML17174B037 List:
References
50-237-91-37-MM, 50-249-91-40, NUDOCS 9112160099
Download: ML17174B038 (24)
v • d • e


Text

\\.

..

..

,,.

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I II Report No ~237/91037(DRP); 50-249/91040(DRP)

Dockets Nos. 50-237; 50-249 License Nos. DPR-19; DPR-25 Licensee:

Commonwea~th Edison Company Opus West III 1400 Opus Place Downers Grove, IL 60515 Facility Name:

Dresden Nucl~~r Power Station, Uni.ts 2 and 3 Meeting At:

  • Region III Office, Glen Ellyn, Illinois Meeting Date:

November 12, 1991 Type of Meeting:

Management Meeting

.Approved By:~

P~ojects Section 18

lt-!vb/

Date '

,_

Meeting Summary,

Management meeting conducted November 12, 1991 (Repo~t No /91037(DRP); S0-249/91040(DRP)).

.

Areas Discussed:

An NRC analysis of over 40 events at Dresden in the last year identified the 5 most significant common root causes as implementation of management expe~tations, communications, procedural adherence, procedural quality, and engineering and licensing suppor The licensee addressed each of th~se areas arid a1so discussed long te~m actions that were bei~g developed..

9112160099 911206 PDR ADDCK 05000237 G

PDR

"~ '

DETAILS Person Who Attended the November 12, 1991 Management Meeting Commonwealth. Edison Company C. Reed, Sr.. Vice President, Nuclear Operations*

D. P. Galle., Vice President, BWR Operations K. L. Graesser, General Manager, BWR Operations.

E. D. Eenigenburg, Stati~n Manager C. W. Schroeder, Incoming Station Manager T. J. Kovach, Nucl~ar Licensing Manager G. P. Wagneri Nuclear Engineering Manager

~- Z~gar, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Representative

  • Nuclear Regulatory Commission A. B. Davis, Regional Administrator, RIII C. J. Paperiello, Deputy Regional Administrator, RIII B. A. Boger, Director, Divisi.on of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V and Special Projects, NR E. G. Greenman, Director, Division of Reactor Projects (DRP), RIII R. J. Barrett, Director, Project Directorate, III-Z, NRR H. J. Mille~. Director, Division of Reactor Safety (ORS), RIII W. L. Axelson, Deputy Division Director, Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards (DRSS), RIIt H. Clayton~ Chief Branch 2, DRP, Rill G. E. Grant, Regional Coordinator, DEDO, Office of the Executive Director of *Operations B. L. Burgess, Chfef, Section lB, DRP, RlII M. C. Schumacher, Section Chief, DRSS, RIII M. W. Streibich, Co-op, DRP, Rill

.

.

.

Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety R. R. Wight, Manager, Offi~e of Nucle~r Facility Sifety R. J. Zuffa, Resident Engineer, Dresden Management Meeting A management meeting was held in the NRC Region III *office on

  • November 12, 199 This meeting was held to discuss con~erns of the NRC regarding a decline in performance at the Dresden Statio The NRC resident inspectors, with assistance from the Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety resident engineer compiled an assessment of over 40 *

~ecent events at D~esden. In this assessment, five significant common

~oot caLlses were identifie These root cius~s were 1) implementation of management expectations, 2) communications, 3) procedure adherence, 4)

procedure quality, and 5) engineering and licensing suppor The assessment. and conclusions were sent to the licensee in a letter dated November 8, 199 *

The meeting followed the agenda which is provided as enclosure 1 to this repor Following a presentation of the assessment by the NRC, the licensee responded ackn6wledging the concern The licensee al~o preserited a number of actions being taken and under development a~ part of a three phase program to respond to NRC concern Slides from the licensee's presentation are provided as enclosure 2 to this report. The licen~ee closed with i description of resources availabl~ for suppor~ing

.the corrective *action plans fo~ Dresde The meeting ended with remarks by the NRC acknowledging the cooperati6n of the licensee and stating that the effectiveness of the corrective actions

  • .described ~ould be mohitored by the NRC inspection program.

r*

Enclosure 1 MEETING AGENDA Opening Remarks:*

A. Bert Davis Regional Administrator

  • Assessment Overview: Edward G. Greenma Event Analysis:

Director, DRP.

Bruce Burgess Section. Chief, lB. *.*

Walt Rogers Senior Resident Inspector

. Commonwealth Edison Company Assessment Corrective Action Discussion

-.

'.

Closing. Remarks:.

A. Bert Pavis, et a.... :............

,:,,,,,.

  • .
  • ............

.

.

  • ~. *

Dresden Station* * *

I VI

.

u c::

w

'

'

.

..

Management Meeting*. *. *

11/12/91

  • Dresden* Station Management Meeting - 11 /12/91
    • -...;.........;.--------,----~---------

/

!

.

I

'

.,

.

I

)

!

I I

.

Introduction Dennis Galle *

Short Term Actions -

Chuck Schroeder

  • Long Term Approach * Chuck Schroeder*

Conclusion Cordell Reed.

.

. 111203b

.

  • ***

.

.

Dresden Station. *

..

,

.i:"

Short Term Actions

  • Chuck Schroeder

. Management.Meeting 11/12/91.

,

I 111203d

. l

!.

\\

.

I I

I

.

Dresden Station. *.

  • . Short Term Actions
  • Overview
  • Developed* by Station/Corporate Mgm.

.

  • Several in Place in Response to.Previous Events
  • Effectiveness Monitored by Corporate Review Group

.

.

.

.

.

  • Others May be *Added at Station/Corp. Discretio *Reduction in Scope Requires Corp. Concurrence
  • All Will be Evaluated for Continuation as Part.of Long Term Action Planning *

111201

.

I '

.

I

..

Dresden Station Short Term *Actions

! * Implementation of Management Expectations

. -. -~---,;_.___----------------

..

~

' i

  • Focused and Frequent Senior Management Presence in the Plant..

. * * Daily Senior Management Meeting ~to* Review..

Observations..

  • Personnel Error Interviews by Senior Managers

.

.

  • Asst. Supt~ Op*erating One~on-One *Expectation *

Meetings 111201*

! '

I

.

i J..

  • ,
      • --* '

Dresden* Station* *

Short Term *Actions

. lmpt*ementation of Management Expectations.

  • Control Room Overviews**. **

- SE/OE Observing Crews * * *

- Special NQP SRO Assist Visit

  • Shift Crew Visits to Other* Stations *
  • Continue Maintenance 2nd Line Supervisor Observations
  • Implement Corporate _Oversight Meetings 111201g

Dresden Statio Short* Term* Actions * *

Communications *.

  • Improve Shift Turnov.e*r Process
    • Continue Operations lmproveme.nt Team
  • Significant Station Event Communications
  • Continue and Enhance.HLA Briefings
  • Further Implement 3-Level *Down Meetings *

.

111201b

.

I I

'

_ Dresden Station Short Term* Actions -

Procedure*Adherence -

  • Develop Clear, Concise Statement ;of Procedure.

. Adherence Expectations

  • Communicate the Procedure Adherence Expectations

_to All Personn_el Thru Multiple Methods

  • *Monitor Implementation of Adherence _Policy Via the
  • * Senior Management Plant *observations 1112010
  • .

i.

Dresden Station

  • Short Term Actions*

Procedure Quality *

  • Assign Overall Procedure Manager for the Station
  • Implement the New Work Package Expectations Guideline
  • Review All D3R12 S/R Work Packages for Proper PMT Requirements

'11.1201d

-_Dresden Station

  • short Term *Actions-Engineering and Licensing Support
  • Revise ENC Operabi.lity Review Procedure

-*Provide Additional Resources

_ - Long Standing Technical Issues

_ - Long Standing Equipment Problems _

- Accelerate -UFSAR Rebaseline

-*Increase Licensing Resources

  • Address Dresden Licensing Priorities with NRR

- *Conduct Station Training_ on Waiver of Compliance -

1112019

.

.;.....

-;;.

.

.

.*

.

Dresden Station I

  • .

.

.

Long Term Approach * *

.

'

.

.

.

..

.

Chuck Schroeder Management Meetin /12/91 111203*..

'

'

I

  • Dresden Station.*

Dresden Situational Review Team*

!~~.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-------

\\

.* !

.

. 1

~-

. I

.

.. *,

'

    • .*

.. ***.. 0.*.

  • .. *
  • ..
  • Situational Review *Addresses s-i~:q~er Scope.. *

.

.

~'

.

.

.

J

.

'

..

.

.

,

'

r

.

. *Output is Starting Point for Dresden Strate.gies

.

.

..

.

.

.

.

  • . *Action Plans to be Prepared* for Each Strategy
  • Action Plans to. be *Tracked/Monitored Like ZMAP *
  • Ongoing 6 Month Situational Review to Refocus

.

.

.

.

  • Living Process - Self Correcting - Ongoing * *

111202*

Dresden Station Dresden Situational Review Team

.

.

.

.

.

.

    • Chartered by VP BWR Operations and New Station * *

Manager

. *Purpose - To* 1*dentify Issues That Negativel.y Impact. * * *

Station Performance 111202b*

...

I.

.1 I

!

I.

D.uane Karjala

'

'

'

  • *.Perry Barnes J:erry Huffman*

. J*ack Brunner Jim Coonan **

  • Rich Johnso *

Dresden. Station DSRT Members

  • Chuck Schroeder
  • Rita Ra*dtke Rock Aker Kevin Bartes Rob Stachni Harry Kister*

111202C

-

. **'*

..

  • Dresden Station

. * Dresden Situational Review Team Approach

..

I '----'------------'-------------

    • Primarily *Used Existing Data.
  • Symptom Classification Root Cause Review * *

- 219 DVR's 15 * HPES Events* (For Past Year).

- Performed 10/15/91 to 10/25/91

  • .

- Headed by D. *Karjala. (Zion). with Station Assistanc Utilized the Symptom Classification *Technique. *

- Provided Starting-Point for SRT *

.

~

111202d

I.

.

I

.-*_Dresden *Station *

. Dresden Situational Review Team Approach * *.*

.

I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

'

i * * * CECo SALP Data Base

_ *October, 1991 SALP Report

  • August/Septe*mber, 1991 NQP CorTiparative Audit
  • *August, 1991 INPO Draft Report *
  • Spring, 1991 INPO Assist Visit - Maintenance DVR's..
  • '

.

.

. *January, 1991 Combined Performance Assessment.

  • Other Similar Data.
  • Some Validation Via Interviews.*

111202*.

\\

.

. t r::.*.....

"-.::-

  • Dresden *station *.

Approach ~or 1992

.

Develop Detailed. Action Plans to. Address These Key_ Areas

  • .Improve Definition* and. lmp.lementation of *
  • Vision/Mission/Strategy /Expectations

'

  • Improve the Te~m

~ Communic*ations -

  • * - Empowerment and Accountability

~ -Performance Appraisal

  • Improve Task* Management*

. - Prioritization and* Resource. Management

~-Planning, ;Scheduling, and Work Control

  • - Procedures Upgrade

- Commitment Managemen *Resolution of Technical* Issues*

- Other Backlogs *.

1112021

Dresden Station* **

Steps**to -Ensure Succes * * * * D. Karjala Starts as Dresden DMAP Director 12/2

  • Tracking/Monitoring* Process Same as Successful Zion *

l

  • Program (ZMAP)
    • O.D. (Organizational Development). Assistance.
  • Corporate Providing Additional Resources *

.

.

  • . *Corporate* Review Group

. *Process Designed to be Self Correcting-Self Adjusting

. 1112021

  • Dresden Station * *

".

.*

Conclusion

.

.

Cordell Reed Management Meeting

.. 11/12/91

  • .

111203f

,

.*

Dresden Station* *

Resources Applied to Address Issues

  • * * Situational Review Team
  • New DMAP Director (Zion Experience)

. **Funding, (Approximate Allocation)

. - Station O&M * $7V2 *Million (1992)

- ENC * * O&M. $5 Million (1992)

  • Resources Applied to Overview Improvements

'

.

  • Corporate Review Group
  • Corporate Organization Change
    • * QPAG Reviews

.* 1112039

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=IR_05000237/1991037&oldid=5133395"