IR 05000237/1991041

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Enforcement Conference Repts 50-237/91-41 & 50-249/91-45 on 911210.Major Areas Discussed:Three Violations,Including Failure to Perform Adequate post-maint Testing & Failure to Perform Required Design Control of Door Seal Replacement
ML17174B057
Person / Time
Site: Dresden  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 12/16/1991
From: Lougheed V, Nejfelt G, Phillips M, Wright G
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML17174B056 List:
References
50-237-91-41-EC, 50-249-91-45, NUDOCS 9112240150
Download: ML17174B057 (5)


Text

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY. COMMISSION

  • REGION III Reports N /91041(DRS); *50-249/91045(DRS)

Docket No and 50-249 Licenses N DPR-19 and DPR-25 Enfordement Action No. EA-91-164 Licensee:

commonwealth Edison Company Opus West III

.

Downers Grove, IL 60515 Facility Name:

Dresden Station Unit 2 and Unit 3 Meeting Conducted:

December 10 '* 1991 Meeting At:

Holiday Inn, Lombard, IL Type of Meeting:

Enforcement Conference

. * Inspectors:

G. M. Nejfelt Reviewed By:

Approved By:

Meeting*summary

..

i -~* /t i; I 9 I...

Date i';t/I (, /fi

  • Date>

Oat~

'

oate *

Areas Discussed:

Three apparent vioiati.ons were presented. * The fir~t, failure to perform adequate post-maintenance testing (e.g., local leak rate testing), resulted in the "Unit 3 T6rus and Drywell Outer Isolation Purge Valve," 3-1601-24, being unknowingly left partially open (i.e.*, subsequent local leak rate testing could ncit pressurize the piping) £Or approximately

18 ~onths during periods of reactor power operations.. Effdrts were taken and additional items planned by the licensee to ensure that necessary post-maintenance testing will be performe The second and third items, concerning the Unit 2 Reactor Building Trackway Outer Door*seal, addressed failures:

(1) to perform required design control of the door seal replacement; and (2) to

~112240150 911217 PDR*

ADOC~ 05000237 Q

PDR

  • t'ake appropriate compensatory action with door seals manually.

defeated (e.g., secondary containment degradation).

The door seal tinauthorized modification has been returne~ to its.original acceptable configuration.

...... ~

  • .......

'*

'* DETAILS Enforcement Conference Attendees Commonwealth Edison Compan D. Galle, Vice President; BWR Operations

  • K. L. Graesser, General Manager of Boiling Water Reactor Operations
  • *

c.. W. Schroe.der, Station Manager, Dresden E. Eenigenburg, Former Station Manager,*. Dresden s. L. Trubatch 1 Counselor, (Firm of] Sidley & Austin T. Kovach, Nuclear Licensing Manager

. *

.

G. L-. Smith, Assistant Operations Superint~ndent, Dresden*

M. Gallaway, Mechanical Maintenance Staff, Dresden

  • *

T. Dolan, Senior Work Analyst, Dresden B. Colebank, Maintenance* staff, Dresden

,

R. Janecek, Offsite Review Senior Participant, Corporate

  • M. Korchynsky, Unit 3 Operating Engineer, Dresden R. Scott, Station Control Room Engineer,** Dre~den *

M. Parcell, Shift Engineer, Dresden

M. Vincent, Radwaste Staff s.* Lawson, Safety Systems Group Leader, Technical Staff, Dresden N. DuBuy, Saf~ty Assessment K. Deck,.OnsiteNuclearSafety W. E. "organ, Dresden Station R. Radtke, Nuclear Licensing

  • P. Barne-s, Nuclear Licensing **

Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety-R. Zoffa, Resident Ipspector, riresden u. s. Nuclear.Regulatory*c6mmission A. B. Davis, Regional Administrator, Region III T. O. Martin, Deputy Director, Di,vision of Reactor Safety (DRS)

G. c. *Wright; Chief, Operations Branch, DR * B. Clayton, Chief, Project Branch No. 1, Division of Reactor*

Projects (DRP)

.

.

. *

W. Troskoski, Acting Director, Enforcement and Investigation Coordination Staff (EICS)

..

  • c. A. Mohrwinkel, Senior Management Analyst and Attorney, Off ice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation * (NRR)

B. A. Berson, Regional Counsel *

B. L. Burgess, Chief, Project Section lB, DRP B. Siegel, Dresden Project Manager; NRR M~ Nejfelt, Regional ~n~pector, DRS R. M. Lerch, Project Engineer, DRP

  • c. H. Weil, Enforcement Specialist, EIC M.. Peck, Resident Inspector, Dresden D. Liao, Reactor Engineer, DRP w. Pegg, NRR Technical Intern, Region III Enforcement Conference
  • An Enforcement Conference was held at the Holiday* Inn, in Lombard, Illinois* on the afternoon of December 10~ 199. The conference was conducted as a result of the preliminary findings of inspection~ conducted between *August 29, 1991, and November 15, 1991, in which apparent violations*of NRC regulations and license conditions were identifie Inspection fincU,.ngs were documented in Inspection Reports No. 50-237/91027.(DRP) and No. 50-249/91035(DRS); and we~e*

transmitted to the licensee by letters dated November 15,

. 1991, and November 27, 199 *

  • *

The purposes of the enforcement conference were to discuss

    • the-apparent violations, their causes~ and the li6ensee 1 i corrective actions; to determine if there were any escalating or. mitigating circumstances; and to obtain any*

other information which would help determine the appropriate enforcement' actio Following introductory remarks, the: NRC

. staff opened the conference by stating the purpose of the conference and.the. NRC.concerns, presenting a brief

.

description of the apparent violations, and summarizing the

  • inspection finding The licensee did not contest any of the_apparent violation The 1 ice.ns~e was requested *by the NRC te discuss the:

following:

o

  • pa_ilure to perform adequate post-maintenance te~tirtg (e.g., local leak rate testing) of the Unit 3 Drywell and Torus Outboard Isolation *Purge*

Valve, 3-1601-24;

o Failure to apply appropriate design control in the modification of the Unit 2 Reactor Building Trackway* Outer Door Seal; and o

Failure to take necessary compensatory action with the Unit 2 Reactor Building Trackway Outer Door_

Seal manually defeate The licensee presented their assessment of the above

  • apparent violation The licensee. described th~ events which led to the apparent *violations, includil}g root causes and corrective actions taken. or planned, and presented their determination. of the safety significance. (See En~losure 2)

At the conclusion of the conference;*. the.licensee was lnf ormed.that they would be notified of the final entorcement action in subsequent correspondence *

... '

.,_*

.:*.

5