IR 05000237/1987001
| ML17199Q014 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 06/18/1987 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17199P966 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-237-87-01, 50-237-87-1, 50-249-87-01, 50-249-87-1, NUDOCS 8706240247 | |
| Download: ML17199Q014 (5) | |
Text
APPENDIX SALP BOARD REPORT NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I I I SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE 50-237/87001; 50-249/87001 Inspection Report No Corrmonwealth Edison Company
Name of Licensee Dresden Nuclear Power Station Name of Facility October 1, 1985 through December 31, 1986 Assessment Period SALP 6
'-
Dresden Nuclear Plant Meeting Sunmary The findings and conclusions of the SALP Board are documented in Reports No. 50-237/87001 and No. 50-249/8700 They were discussed with the licensee on April 13, 1987, at the Dresden Nuclear Power Station in Morris, Illinoi The licensee's performance was presented in each functional area. Overall performance and perfonnance in each functional area was found to be acceptable, but exhibiting a declining trend since the last SALP assessment perio The performance ratings declined in the areas of Fire Protection/Housekeeping, Quality Programs and Administrativ.e Controls Affecting Quality (Category 2 to Category 3), and Emergency Preparedness (Category 1 to Category 2).
In addition, a declining trend was noted in the area of Plant Operations~
The licensee continues to have a high level of performance in the area of*
Licensing Activities. The licensee was requested to provide a written response detailing their plans for improving performance in the areas of Plant Operations, Fire Protection/Housekeeping, and Quality Programs and Administrative Controls Affecting Qualit While this meeting was primarily a discussion between the licensee and the NRC, it was open to members of the ptiblic as observer The following licensee and NRC personnel were in attendance on April 13, 198 Commonwealth Edison Company B. J. Thomas, Executive Vice President C. Reed, Vice President of Nuclear Operations D. Galle, Division Vice President and General Manager for Nuclear Stations D. Farrar, Director of Nuclear Licensing N. Kalivianakis, Division Vice President for Nuclear Stations E. D. Eenigenburg, Station Manager, Dresden U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Colllllission A. B. Davis, Regional Administrator C. E. Norelius, Director, Division of Reactor Projects M. A. Ring, Chief, Reactor Projects Section lC L. G. McGregor, Senior Resident Inspector, Dresden N. V. Gilles, Project Inspector~ Reactor Projects Section IC NRC Headquarters R. W. Cooper, Region III Coordinator; DEDRO Attachment: Licensee's Response to SALP Report dated May 13, 198 '.
. \\*~
SALP BOARD REPORT ERRATA SHEET Facility: Dresden Nuclear Power Station SALP Report No.:
50-237/87001; 50-249/87001 Page Line Now Reads Should Read
13 85036 through 85044 85035 through 85044 Basis for change:
LER 85035 for Unit 2 was inadvertently left out of the LER lis '.
14 86001 through 86027 86001 through 86028 Basis for change:
LER 86028 for Unit 2 was inadvertently left out of the LER lis through 85025 85017 through 85026 Basis for change:
LERs 85017 through 85020 and 85026 were inadvertently left out of the LER lis /
3 August 11, 1986 - Region III Office: Enforcement conference with CECo representatives to discuss a radioactive materials trans-portation incident at the Dresden station, and the licensee's*
corrective actions and enforcement options available to the NR Confirmatory AC:.tion Letters (CALs)
o Confirmatory Action Letters (CALs) were issued during this a sessment perio.
Re orts and 10 CFR 21 Re orts Submitted LERs
'.
Dresde Unit 2 Dock.et.
50-2~7 LER Nos.:
85036 through 85044 6001 through 86027 Dresden Unit \\..!"
Dock.et No.:
S LER Nos.:
8502 ough 85025
. *..
86001 r~h 86024
Seventy-two LERs wer ~ued during the assessment period:
41 LERs were the resu i~ personnel errors; 9 lERs were the result of procedure ina e"ilf~es; 5 LERs were the results of component/equipment f i1 s: 2 LERs were related to design problems; and 15 LERs fel 1 the "other" cause cod This SALP 6 total of 72 LERs dee i~~ from the SALP 5 total of 9 However, personnel errors co ~~d to represent a significant percentage of the total at S
~
Cause Codes Areas LER
).,.
Personnel Error Design Deficiency External Cause Procedure Inadequacy Component/Equipment Others Unknown
2
9 s
3 n
NOTE:
The above information was derived from rev ws of Licensee Event Reports performed by NRC Sta may not completely coincide with the unit or use assignments which the licensee has mad In a ition, this table 1s based on assigning one cause code each LER and does not necessarily correspond to t
111>> - -... :~
- -- August 11, 1986 - Region III Office: Enforcement conference with CECo representatives to discuss a radioactive materials trans-*
portation incident at the Dresden station, and the licensee's corrective actions and enforcement options available to the NR Confirmatory Action Letters (CALs)
No Confirmatory Action Letters (CALs) were issued during this assessment perio A Review of Licensee Event Reports, and 10 CFR 21 Reports Submitted by the Licensee Licensee Event Reports (LERs}
'.
Dresden Unit 2 Docket No.:
50-237 LER Nos.:
85035 through 85044 86001 through 86028 Dresden Unit 3 Docket No.:
50-249 LER Nos.: 85017 through 85026 86001 through 86024
Seventy-two LERs were issued during the assessment period:
41 LERs were the result of personnel errors; 9 LERs were the result of procedure inadequacies; 5 LERs were the results of component/equipment failures: 2 LERs were related to design problems; and 15 LERs fell in the "other" cause cod This SALP 6 total of 72 LERs declined from the SALP 5 total of 9 However, personnel errors continued to represent a significant percentage of the total at 57%.
Cause Codes Areas LERs Personnel Error
Design Deficiency
External Cause
Procedure Inadequacy
Component/Equipment
Others
Unknown
NOTE:
The above information was derived from reviews of Licensee Event Reports performed by NRC Staff and may not completely coincide with the unit or cause assignments which the licensee has mad In addition, this table is based on assigning one cause code for each LER and does not necessarily correspond to the 34