IR 05000010/1977012
| ML20037B121 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 06/03/1977 |
| From: | Jordan E, Eric Lee NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20037B117 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-010-77-12, 50-10-77-12, NUDOCS 8009030819 | |
| Download: ML20037B121 (4) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.
_. _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
._
_...
_ - - - - -
..
.
- - -
- - ~
%
.
U.S. '!UCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 0FFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
-
^
REGION III
-
Report No. 50-010/77-12 Docket No.50-010 License No. DPR-2 Licensee: Commonwealth Edison Company P.O. Box 767 Chicago, IL 60690 Facility Name: Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1 Inspection at: Dresden Site, Morris, IL
-
Inspection Conducted: May 24 and 26, 1977 Inspector:
E. W. K. Lee
-
'
date signed)
W/w
.
l
.
-
Approved by:.. L.
dan, Chief
/# 77
-
.
. Engine ring Support Section (date ' signed)
Inspection Summary Inspection on May 24 and 26, 1977 (Report No. 50-010/77-12)
Areas Inspected: Reviewed QA manual and QC procedures and observed work activities relative to HPCI building concrete activities. The inspection involved 8 onsite inspection hours.
~
Results: One apparent item of' noncompliance (infraction - failure to control the issuance of document - Paragraph 1.a) was identified.
8009030
/'
'
.
-
.r* }.
-
.
,
.,
.
.
,
.
I L
- - - _ - -.
..
.-.
.-
-
e
.
i
. DETAILS I
'
\\
.
-
Persons Contacted
,
Principal Licensee Employees
- G.
E. Groth, Station Construction Engineer
- F.
Paulikas, QA Coordinator
'
- G. W. Reardanz, QA
-
- G.
Reiners, Project-= Engineer
- D.
Shelton, Administrative Assistant Other Personnel
- T. W. Strzeiczyk, QC Inspector, William A. Randolph, Inc.
T. Murphy, QC Engineer, Meyer Material Company
.
-
- denotes those present at the exit interview.
Functional or Program Areas Inspected 1.
Review of QA Manual and QC Procedures Relative to HPCI Building Concrete Activities
.
The inspector reviewed William A. Randolph, Inc.'s (WARI) QA Manual
~
and QC procedures relative to HPCI Building concrete activities, to verify that 10 CFR 50, Appendix B and the applicable code requirements were met.
It was determined that the following areas either f ailed to meet the requirements or need clarification.
a.
The inspector noted that two copies of WARI QA Manual,Section VIII, including the title page, have the same date and revision number, (Revision 2) however, the contents are entirely different.
This finding represents noncompliance with requirements related to 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion VI and WARI QA
Manual,Section II, Paragraph 2.5 which states that "when quality control system instructions and/or procedures are
!
revised in part, whole, or the revised section of page I
thereof, shall be so identified by a note in the right mar-gin of the applicable procedure. The revision will also be noted in the title page."
l l-2-l l
I
[.
T ' I.
'
.
.
.
t
.
.-
-.
. -., _
,_.
_ _ _ _
__.
___m-_
_-.
c_
5Q j'I
>
.
The insnector n'oted an apparent conflict between Section.VIII.
b.
and Section XIV of WARI QA Manual..Section VIII, Paragraph 8.2
.
does' not allow material or equipment to be installed-if it
'
has 'a " hold" tag applied to it. [Section XIV,. Paragraphs 14.4.1
_
x and 14~.4.2 allow material and equipment with a " hold" tag to be
>
.
released conditionally for installation. The licensee and his contractor agreed to provide clarification on this matter.
The inspector stated that this matter is considered unresolved and will be reviewed during a subsequent inspection.
,
c.
.The inspector-stated that conditional release for installation of material or equipment with a " hold" tag as allowed by WARI
.
QA Manual,Section XIV,' paragraphs 14.4.1 and 14.4.2 can not be applied to all 1:. cms, especially consumables. The licensee and
,-
!
his contractor concurred and agreed to provide clarification.
The inspector stated that this matter is considered unresolved
,
and will be reviewed during a' subsequent inspection.
d.
The inspector established that the WARI QA Manual does not address the traceability _of material and components. Upon questioning the licensee's contractor,-the inspector was in-
,
formed that materials which require traceability within the scope of the purchase order are reinforcing bars and embedments and the controls of those materials are covered by the suppliers'
-QC procedures. The inspector reviewed the suppliers' QC proce-
-
dures and determined that they are acceptable. Nonetheless,-the
inspector stated that measures for traceability of material should be addressed in the QA Manual. The licensee and his con-tractor agreed to revise the QA-Manual to include this provision.
This matter is considered unresolved.
2.
Observation of Concrete Work Activities The inspector observed the concrete placement for the embedded
,
l electrical conduits. The concrete was transported to the site i
by mixing trucks from a batch plant approximately 13 miles away.
- The inspector determined work activities were in accordance with established procedures. Work was stopped by the licensee after
'
approximately 50 yards of concrete was placed due to concrete tem-perature exceeding procedure requirements. The inspector also toured the batch plant operated by Meyer Material Company. The
'
inspector determined material storage and operation met procedural requirements. The inspector has no further questions on this. matter.
3-
-
1 e
P
.
,
F'
?
.e
,..
,
.-
. - -, -, - - -
- -,-,,,,.,_.,. _ _, -
y-
-
,
.,,-.;,-.
c.-
.,,.. _ _ - _. -
4.-
.
r
-
. -...
.+*
1-
-
_
_.
_
_ _ _ - - -
_..
.
,
,-
~, -
Unresolved Items
- '
.
.
.
I Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required
_
'
in order to ascertain whether they are acceptable items, items of
,
noncompliance or deviations. Unresolved items disclosed during the inspection are discussed under Patagraphs 1.b,1.c ar,' 1.d.
Exit Interview The inspector met with licensee representatives at the conclusion of the inspection on May 26, 1977. The inspector summari::ed the scope and findings of the inspection. The licensee acknowledged the information.
.
O e
k a
!
l l
i l
l-4-
!
l
'
.-
j' !
.
.
.