05000498/FIN-2013007-04
From kanterella
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Finding | |
|---|---|
| Title | Failure to Follow Preventative Maintenance Procedure for Reactor Containment Fan Cooler |
| Description | The team identified a Green, non-cited violation of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, Instructions, Procedures, and Drawings, which states, in part, Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented procedures of a type appropriate to the circumstances and shall be accomplished in accordance with these procedures. Specifically, on November 3, 2013, maintenance personnel performing a maintenance activity change and performing the second party technical review did not initial and date the change that was performed for reactor containment fan cooler 12C backdraft damper as required by Procedure MG-0006, Work Execution and Closeout Guideline, Revision 11, step 6.2.3. In response to this issue, the licensee initiated revisions to the associated work order instructions and established as-found trend data for backdraft damper 12C. This finding was entered into the licensees corrective action program as Condition Reports 14-1820 and 14-1836. The team determined that failure to follow Procedure MG-0006 to complete the preventative maintenance work order on reactor containment fan cooler 12C as instructed was a performance deficiency. This finding was more than minor because it adversely affected the Mitigating Systems Cornerstone attribute of Procedure Quality and affected the cornerstone objective to ensure the availability, reliability, and capability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences. Specifically, not performing a proper procedure change does not ensure a proper technical review of the change and had the potential to challenge the availability and capability of the reactor containment fan cooler. In accordance with Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, Appendix A, The Significance Determination Process (SDP) for Findings At-Power, dated June 19, 2012, Exhibit 2, Mitigating Systems Screening Questions, the issue screened as having very low safety significance (Green) because it was a design or qualification deficiency that did not represent a loss of operability or functionality; did not represent an actual loss of safety function of the system or train; did not result in the loss of one or more trains of non-technical specification equipment; and did not screen as potentially risk significant due to seismic, flooding, or severe weather. This finding had a cross-cutting aspect in the area of human performance, resources component because procedures were not available to ensure successful work performance. |
| Site: | South Texas  |
|---|---|
| Report | IR 05000498/2013007 Section 1R21 |
| Date counted | Mar 31, 2014 (2014Q1) |
| Type: | NCV: Green |
| cornerstone | Mitigating Systems |
| Identified by: | NRC identified |
| Inspection Procedure: | IP 71111.21 |
| Inspectors (proximate) | N Okonkwo S Kobylarz T Farnholtz T Skaggs Ryan C Cowdrey G Replogle J Dixon J Zudans |
| Violation of: | 10 CFR 50 Appendix B Criterion V |
| CCA | H.1, Resources |
| INPO aspect | LA.1 |
| ' | |
Finding - South Texas - IR 05000498/2013007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finding List (South Texas) @ 2014Q1
Self-Identified List (South Texas)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||