05000352/LER-2004-002, Regarding Period of Operation That Exceeded the License Maximum Power Level

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Regarding Period of Operation That Exceeded the License Maximum Power Level
ML042890269
Person / Time
Site: Limerick Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/15/2004
From: Degregorio R
Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
LER 04-002-00
Download: ML042890269 (8)


LER-2004-002, Regarding Period of Operation That Exceeded the License Maximum Power Level
Event date:
Report date:
Reporting criterion: 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B)
3522004002R00 - NRC Website

text

10CFR50.73 October 15, 2004 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Limerick Generating Station, Unit 1 Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-39 NRC Docket No. 50-352 Subject: LER 1-04-002, Period Of Operation That Exceeded The License Maximum Power Level This Licensee Event Report (LER) addresses a period of operation between 100% and 100.3% of rated thermal power due to the 1A feedwater flow transmitter being out-of-calibration. This resulted in a license violation regarding the maximum power level limit of 3458 megawatts thermal.

Report Number:

1-04-002 Revision:

00 Event Date:

May 23, 2004 Discovered Date:

September 15, 2004 Report Date:

October 15, 2004 This LER is being submitted pursuant to the requirements of License Condition 2.F, which requires a 30-day written followup in accordance with the procedures described in 10CFR50.73(b), (c), and (e).

If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Sincerely, Original signed by Ron J. DeGregorio Vice President - Limerick Exelon Generation Company, LLC cc: S. J. Collins, Administrator Region I, USNRC S. L. Hansell, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, LGS

SUMMARY OF EXELON NUCLEAR COMMITMENTS LS-AA-117-1003 Rev.2 The following table identifies commitments made in this document. (Any other actions discussed in the submittal represent intended or planned actions. They are described to the NRC for the NRC's information and are not regulatory

commitments

)

Commitment #1 Committed date (or "outage"): 12/31/04 The thermal performance monitoring program will be enhanced to include a requirement for long-term trending of critical plant parameters.

NRC FORM 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY (1-2001)

COMMISSION LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)

(See reverse for required number of digits/characters for each block)

A PPROVED BY OMB NO. 3150-0104 EXPIRES 6-30-2001 Estimated burden per response to comply with this mandatory information collection request:

50 hours5.787037e-4 days <br />0.0139 hours <br />8.267196e-5 weeks <br />1.9025e-5 months <br />. Reported lessons learned are incorporated into the licensing process and fed back to industry. Send comments regarding burden estimate to the Records Management Branch (T-6 E6), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, or by internet e-mail to bjs1@nrc.gov, and to the Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, NEOB-10202 (3150-0104), Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503. If a means used to impose information collection does not display a currently valid OMB control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the information collection FACILITY NAME (1)

DOCKET NUMBER (2)

PAGE (3) imerick Generating Station, Unit 1 L

05000 352 1

OF 5

TITLE (4)

Operation Exceeding License Maximum Power Level EVENT DATE (5)

LER NUMBER (6)

REPORT DATE (7)

OTHER FACI IES INVOLVED (8)

LIT FACILITY NAME DOC ET NUMBER K

MO DAY YEAR YEAR SEQUENTIAL NUMBER REV NO MO DAY YEAR 05000 FACILITY NAME DOC ET NUMBER K

05 23 2004 2004 002 00 10 15 2004 05000 THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR §: (Check all that apply) (11)

OPERATING MODE (9) 1 20.2201(b) 20.2203(a)(3)(ii) 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B) 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A) 20.2201(d) 20.2203(a)(4) 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 50.73(a)(2)(x)

POWER LEVEL (10) 100 20.2203(a)(1) 50.36(c)(1)(i)(A) 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A) 73.71(a)(4) 20.2203(a)(2)(i) 50.36(c)(1)(ii)(A) 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A) 73.71(a)(5) 20.2203(a)(2)(ii) 50.36(c)(2) 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B) x 20.2203(a)(2)(iii) 50.46(a)(3)(ii) 50.73(a)(2)(v)(C) 20.2203(a)(2)(iv) 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A) 50.73(a)(2)(v)(D)

OTHER Specify in Abstract below or in 20.2203(a)(2)(v) 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B) 50.73(a)(2)(vii) 20.2203(a)(2)(vi) 50.73(a)(2)(i)(C) 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 20.2203(a)(3)(i) 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A) 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B)

LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)

NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include Area Code)

Keith S. Kemper, Manager - Regulatory Assurance (610) 718-3400 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT (13)

CAUSE

SYSTEM COMPONEN T

MANU-FACTURER REPORTABLE TO EPIX

CAUSE

SYSTEM COMPONENT MANU-FA CTURER REPORTABLE TO EPIX B

SJ FT R369 Y

SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14)

MONTH DAY YEAR YES (If yes, complete EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE).

X NO EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE (15)

ABSTRACT (Limit to 1400 spaces i e approximately 15 single-spaced typewritten lines) (16)

The unit was discovered to be operating in violation of the Facility Operating License at approximately 100.3 percent of rated thermal power following identification of increasing trends in several balance-of-plant parameters. The trends started on May 23, 2004. Calculated thermal power decreased as the output of the transmitter decreased, which resulted in operators increasing power to maintain indicated power at 100 percent. The degraded transmitter was replaced to provide an accurate feedwater flow measurement input to the thermal power calculation.

NRC FORM 366 (1-2001) (1-2001)

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)

FACILITY NAME (1)

DOCKET (2)

LER NUMBER (6)

PAGE (3)

YEAR SEQUENTIAL NUMBER REVISION NUMBER Limerick Generating Station, Unit 1 05000352 2004 002 00 2

OF 5

NARRATIV (If more space is required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366A) (17)

E Unit Conditions Prior to the Event Unit 1 was in Operational Condition (OPCON) 1 (Power Operation) at approximately 100% power. There were no structures, systems or components out of service that contributed to this event.

Description of the Event On September 15, 2004, at 16:00 hours, Engineering notified Operations that Unit 1 was potentially exceeding the Facility Operating License (FOL) maximum power level of 3458 megawatts thermal. This was based on an observation of increasing trends in feedwater temperature, condensate flow, main turbine steam flow, and turbine inlet pressure. Engineering initially estimated that thermal power was 100.4 percent of licensed thermal power. Operators subsequently reduced power to 99 percent of rated thermal power to provide margin.

Subsequent troubleshooting identified that the 1A feedwater (EIIS:SJ) flow transmitter (EIIS:FT) signal displayed on the Plant Monitoring System (PMS) computer was less than the signal to the digital feedwater control system. Further investigation identified that the transmitter was out-of-calibration and accounted for a non-conservative error in the thermal power calculation of approximately 0.3 percent rated thermal power.

The transmitter was replaced and returned to service. The post maintenance test verified the transmitter input to the thermal power calculation was accurate. The 1B and 1C feedwater flow transmitter inputs into the thermal power calculation were verified to be within the calibration sheet allowable minimum and maximum limits. Unit 2 parameters were verified to be as expected for 100 percent thermal power operation.

The daily surveillance logs (ST-6-107-590-1 and ST-6-107-590-2) were previously revised to add once per shift monitoring that heat balance sensors are within expected ranges when thermal power is greater than or equal to 98 percent. Due to this event this section was revised to include monitoring of main turbine control valve (EIIS:V) position and main turbine inlet pressure, which are not used in the heat balance calculation. The steady (1-2001)

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)

FACILITY NAME (1)

DOCKET (2)

LER NUMBER (6)

PAGE (3)

YEAR SEQUENTIAL NUMBER REVISION NUMBER Limerick Generating Station, Unit 1 05000352 2004 002 00 3

OF 5

NARRATIV (If more space is required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366A) (17)

E state operations procedure (GP-5) was revised to include monitoring that main turbine total control valve position and main turbine inlet pressure are not exceeding the expected values at 100 percent core thermal power. Power was restored to 100 percent on September 20, 2004.

This event involved a condition that was prohibited by the plants FOL Section 2.C.(1) Maximum Power Level. The FOL Section 2.F. requires that violations of FOL Section 2.C be reported by ENS within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> with written followup within 30 days in accordance with the procedures described in 10CFR50.73(b), (c), and (e). The ENS notification (EN 41043) was completed on September 16, 2004 at 12:17 hours. This LER is being submitted pursuant to the requirements of the Facility Operating License Section 2.F.

Analysis of the Event

There were no actual safety consequences associated with this event. The potential safety consequences of this event were minimal.

The investigation determined that the 1A feedwater flow transmitter output was less than the allowable minimum value specified on the calibration sheet. The minimum and maximum calibration limits are based on the 0.25 percent of full-scale accuracy requirement for the transmitter. The 1A feedwater flow transmitter output was found to be approximately 0.64 percent of full scale below the ideal output at normal operating conditions. Bench testing of the degraded transmitter is in progress.

The "A" feedwater flow instrument loop calibration was also checked and the loop/computer output was found to be within the loop's Lower Acceptance Limit of 0.57 percent of full scale at normal operating conditions. The Lower Acceptance Limit of 0.57 percent is based on the combined 0.25 percent of full-scale accuracy for the transmitter and other components in the loop that were 0.1 percent and 0.5 percent of full-scale accuracy. (1-2001)

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)

FACILITY NAME (1)

DOCKET (2)

LER NUMBER (6)

PAGE (3)

YEAR SEQUENTIAL NUMBER REVISION NUMBER Limerick Generating Station, Unit 1 05000352 2004 002 00 4

OF 5

NARRATIV (If more space is required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366A) (17)

E The Limerick licensing basis allows for uncertainty in calculation of thermal power. As described in the Limerick UFSAR section 4.4, the overall Unit 1 feedwater flow uncertainty as calculated is 0.81% of rated flow. The licensing basis overall feedwater flow uncertainty is 1.76 percent. A Limerick analysis determined that safety margins are adequate to support a 2.24 percent feedwater flow uncertainty. The licensing basis power uncertainty for U.S. BWRs is 2.0 percent as documented in GESTAR II (General Electric Standard Application for Reactor Fuel). Therefore, operation at 100.3 percent thermal power is bounded by the existing feedwater flow uncertainty analysis.

Cause of the Event

The cause of the overpower condition was time dependent degradation of the 1A feedwater flow transmitter output in a non-conservative direction.

Corrective Action Completed The 1A feedwater flow transmitter was replaced and returned to service.

Main turbine control valve position and main turbine inlet pressure monitoring were added to the once per shift heat balance parameter checks in the daily surveillance logs. The steady state operations procedure was revised to monitor main turbine control valve position and main turbine inlet pressure when operating at full power.

The system engineering monitoring plans were revised to ensure appropriate points are monitored.

Corrective Action Planned The thermal performance monitoring program will be enhanced to include a requirement for long-term trending of specific balance-of-plant parameters. This will be complete by 12/31/04.

A vendor-assisted evaluation is in progress to determine the cause of the time dependent degradation in the flow transmitter performance. (1-2001)

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)

FACILITY NAME (1)

DOCKET (2)

LER NUMBER (6)

PAGE (3)

YEAR SEQUENTIAL NUMBER REVISION NUMBER Limerick Generating Station, Unit 1 05000352 2004 002 00 5

OF 5

NARRATIV (If more space is required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366A) (17)

E Previous Similar Occurrences There were no previous occurrences of exceeding maximum license power level due to instrument failure.

Component data:

System:

SJ (Feedwater System)

Component:

FT (Flow Transmitter)

Manufacturer:

R369 (Rosemount Nuclear Instruments Inc)

Model:

1151DP6E22B2