text
_. -
Robsrt tllf. Ocyce Plant Manager Limerick Generating Station
(
{
PECO Energy Company Limerick Generating Station PO Box 2300 Sanatoga, PA 19464E20 215 3771200 Ext. 2000 l
l 10CFR 50.73 February 9,.1996 Docket No. 50-352 License No. NPF-39 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn:
Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555
SUBJECT:
Licensee Event Renort
~
Limerick Generating Station - Unit 1 This LER reports an automatic isolation of the Unit 1 Reactor Core Isolation Cooling (RCIC) system due to an i
inadvertent Primary Containment and Reactor Vessel Isolation Control System isolation signal.
This constitutes an automatic Engineered Safety Feature actuation.
The RCIC system steam supply line inboard primary containment isolation valve automatically closed during surveillance testing due to less than adequate attention to detail by a technician.
Reference:
Docket No. 50-352 Report Number:
1-96-001 Revision Number:
00 Event Date:
January 11, 1996 Report Date:
February 9, 1996 Facility:
Limerick Generating Station P.O.
Box 2300, Sanatoga, PA 19464-2300 This LER is being submitted pursuant to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv).
Very truly yours s.=
i GHS cc:
T. T. Martin, Administrator Region I, USNRC j
N. S. Perry, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, LGS 150010 9602150112 960209 1k PDR ADOCK 05000352 S-ppg
NRC fOnM $66*
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY OMB NO. 3150 0104 (5-92)
EXPIRES 5/31/95 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSi TO COMPLY WITH I
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) hARD" f E$TkST TE O RE
!N BUR N THE INFORMATION AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (MNBB 7714). U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION.
(See reverse for recuired number of digits /cnaracters for each block)
N.
Og5 00g1 RW0g AND TO TH A p
MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET. WASHI ON DC 20 03.
FACILITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2) -
PAGE (3)
Limerick Generating Station - Unit 1 05000352 1 OF: 4 TITLE (4) Automatic Isolation of the Reactor Core isolation Cooling System During Surveillance Teating Due to Less Than Adeauate Attention to Detail EVENT DATE (5)
LER NUMBER (6)
REPORT DATE (7)
OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (8)
SE AL R
N OE MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR MONTH DAY YEAR FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER 01 11 96 96 ~~ 001 ~~
00 02 09 96 05000 OPERATING THIS REPORT 15 SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR 5: (Chect one or more) (11)
MODE (9) 1 20.402(o) 20.405(c) y 50.73(a)(2)Ov) 73.71(o)
POWER 20.405(as(1)(i) 50.36tc)(1) 50.73(a)(2)tv) 13.71(cs LEVEL (10) 89 20.405(astl)hi) 50.36tc)(2)
- 50. 73( a)(2)(v n )
OInE4 20.405ta)(1)hii) 50.73(a)(2)(1) 50.73(a)(2)(vi11)(A)
(Specify in t@C' bjIC*
20.405(a)(1)hv) 50.73(a)(2)(ii) 50.73ta)(2)(vni)(B) g 20.405ta)(1)(v) 50.13(a)(2)u111 50./3(a)(2)(x)LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)
NML TELEPHONE NUMBER (Inciuce Area Ccce)
J. L. Kantner, Manager - Experience Assessment, LGS (610)718-3400 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT (13) f0
%fD
CAUSE
SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER
CAUSE
SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14)
MONrn On nAa EXPECTED YES SUBMISSION (if yes. complete EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE).
X NO DATE (15)
ABSTRACT (Limit to 14UJ spaces. 1 e.
approximately la single spacec typewritten lines) (16)
At 1820 hours0.0211 days <br />0.506 hours <br />0.00301 weeks <br />6.9251e-4 months <br /> on 01/11/96, during preparations for surveillance testing of the Reactor Core Isolation Cooling (RCIC) s stem, an automatic
/
isolation of the RCIC system occurred due to an inadvertent Primary Containment and Reactor Vessel Isolation Control System isolation signal.
This constitutes an Engineered Safety Feature actuation.
Immediate investigation revealed that two Instrumentation and Controls (IEC) technicians were performing different Surveillance Test (ST) procedures simultaneously.
The ST procedures were suspended, and the 1
RCIC system was restored to an operable status by 1900 hours0.022 days <br />0.528 hours <br />0.00314 weeks <br />7.2295e-4 months <br />.
There were no adverse consequences as a result of the RCIC system isolation.
The cause of this event was personnel error due to less than adequate attention to detail by one of the technicians involved in the event.
Corrective actions include counselling of the involved technician and team meetings to discuss this event.
NRC FORM 366 (5 92)
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY OMB NO. 3150 0104 (5 92)
EXPIRES 5/31/95 t
ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WITH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION RE0 VEST: 50.0 HRS.
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
NNFORMA D EC DS E
B C a
TEXT CONTINUATION g g.gS'ioS N g RE g 0R g
M AG TA ET i
DC FACILITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2)
LER NUMBER (6)
PAGE (3)
YEAR SEQUENTIAL REvi510N k
05000 2 OF 4
}
Limerick Generating Station - Unit 1 352 96
~ ~ 0 01 - ~
00 k
TEXT Ut more space is required, use aaottronal copies at hRC form.366A) (11)
{
Unit Conditions Prior to the Event:
Unit 1 was in Operational Condition 1 (Power Operation) at 89.7% power j
level in end of cycle coastdown.
I Functional testing of the Primary Containment and Reactor Vessel j
Isolation Control System (PCRVICS, EIIS:JM) for the Reactor Core 1
- - Isolation Cooling (RCIC, EIIS:BN) system steam supply line primary containment isolation valves (PCIVs) was in progress at the time of this event.
i Description of the Event:
On january 11, 1996, two Instrumentation and Controls (I&C) technicians were preparing to perform Surveillance Test (ST) procedures ST-2-049-603-1, "NSSSS - RCIC Steam Line D/P HI DIV I, Channel A, Functional Test," and ST-2-049-604-1, "NSSSS-RCIC Steam Line D/P HI Div 3, Channel C,
Functional Test."
Procedure ST-2-049-603-1 (i.e., the 603 test) involves testing the RCIC system steam supply line outboard PCIV (EIIS:ISV) whereas procedure.ST-2-049-604-1 (i.e., the 604 test) involves testing the RCIC system steam supply line inboard PCIV.
One I&C technician was located in the Auxiliary Equipment Room (AER), while a second I&C technician was located in the Main Control Room (MCR).
The MCR I&C technician requested authorization from Operations personnel to perform both the 603 test and the 604 test.
The Unit 1 Reactor Operator (RO) granted authorization to perform only one test at a time, and entered the 603, test in the Unit 1 ST log.
The MCR I&C technician commenced performance of the prerequisites in accordance with the 603 test.
Once the prerequisites were completed, the AER I&C technician began performing switch manipulations at the 10C640 panel in the AER and observed proper indications and responses.
However, at 1820 hours0.0211 days <br />0.506 hours <br />0.00301 weeks <br />6.9251e-4 months <br /> on January 11, 1996, the MCR I&C technician noted an unexpected status light, and the MCR Shift Supervisor and the Unit 1 RO noticed that the RCIC system steam supply line inboard PCIV, HV-049-1F007, had automatically closed on a high steam line differential pressure isolation signal.
The unexpected automatic isolation of the RCIC system due to a simulated PCRVICS isolation signal constitutes an Engineered Safety Feature (ESF) actuation.
.U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY OMB NO. 3150 0104 (5 92)
EXPIRES 5/31/95 INF R I N COLLE OU ST ON k
[
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
NNFO A
C OS E
B TEXT CONTINUATION g @ Q }05 N N REGULA M A TA ET.
iN O DC 4
FACILITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2)
LER NUMBER (6)
PAGE (3)
YEAR SEQUENTIAL REvl510N M ER N
05000 3 OF 4 Limerick Generating Station - Unit 1 352 96 001 ~~
00 TEXT Ut more space as required. use ecaltronal copies of hRC form 366A) (11) t Immediate investigation revealed that the MCR I&C technician was i
performing the'603 test while the AER I&C technician was performing the 604 test.
MCR Operations personnel directed the I&C technicians to suspend performance of both ST procedures and return the RCIC system to its pre-test condition.
At 1825 hours0.0211 days <br />0.507 hours <br />0.00302 weeks <br />6.944125e-4 months <br />, the isolation signal was reset in accordance with General Plant (GP) procedure GP-8, " Primary and Secondary Containment Isolation Verification and Reset,"
and the RCIC system was declared operable by 1900 hours0.022 days <br />0.528 hours <br />0.00314 weeks <br />7.2295e-4 months <br /> on January 11, 1996.
At 2031 hours0.0235 days <br />0.564 hours <br />0.00336 weeks <br />7.727955e-4 months <br /> on January 11, 1996, a 4-hour notification was made to the NRC pursuant to the requirements of 10CFR50.72(b)(2)(ii), since this event resulted in an automatic ESF actuation.
This report is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(iv).
Analysis:
There was no release of radioactive material to the environment or adverse consequences as a result of the RCIC system isolation.
Valve HV-049-1F007 isolated as designed in response to the simulated high steam line differential pressure isolation signal.
The RCIC system was isolated for approximately 40 minutes.
Had this event occurred during an accident condition, sufficient system redundancy existed to mitigate the consequences of an accident.
Cause of the Event
The cause of this event was personnel error due to less than adequate attention to detail by the MCR I&C technician.
Prior to the performance of the ST procedures, both technicians agreed that the 604 test would be performed first.
However, when receiving authorization from Operations to perform the surveillance testing, the MCR I&C technician acknowledged that the Unit 1 RO signed on to the 603 test but failed to recognize that this was not the test to be performed first as previously agreed upon with the AER I&C technician.
The RCIC system isolation occurred because the MCR I&C technician opened the electrical feed for the RCIC system outboard PCIV, HV-049-1F008, in accordance with the 603 test prerequisites rather than opening the electrical feed for the inboard PCIV, HV-049-1F007, in accordance with the 604 test prerequisites.
The purpose of this NRC f0KM 266A.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY OMB NO. 3150 0104 (5-92)
EXPIRES 5/31/95 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WITH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST: 50.0 HRS.
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
NNF EMkN 0
ECO DS B
TEXT CONTINUATION gggS f NNI. AWT(
05 TH AP d
REDUCTION PROJECT (3150-0104).
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET. WASHINGTON. DC 20503.
FACILITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2)
LER NUMBER (6)
PAGE (3)
YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION 05000 4 OF 4 Limerick Generating Station - Unit 1 352 96
~ ~ 001 ~ ~
00 TLxT Ut more space is requirea. use acarttonal coptes at wl Fonn 366A) (11) prerequisite is to preclude the associated valve from stroking closed when the simulated isolation signal is generated during testing.
A barrier that may have prevented the RCIC system isolation from occurring is better three part communications between the I&C technicians in that, once the prerequisites were completed and the actual testing commenced, there were several opportunities through the ongoing communications to identify that they were performing different ST procedures.
Corrective Actions
The I&C technician involved in this event was counselled regarding the n'eed for attention to detail and the use of self check.
Both I&C technicians involved in this event will lead team meetings to
~
discuss the event with all I&C technicians.
These meetings will address what should have taken place to avoid the type of error described in this event.
These meetings are expected to be completed l
by March 29, 1996.
The current expectations and associated training for use of three-part communications during surveillance testing will be reviewed for onhancement.
This review is expected to be completed by March 29, l
4 1996.
Previous Similar Occurrences:
There have been previous Limerick Generating Station (LGS) LERs which involved inadequate attention to detail by individuals performing ST procedures; however, there were no repeat events with respect to the cpecific ST procedures or individuals involved with this event.
|
|---|
|
|
| | | Reporting criterion |
|---|
| 05000352/LER-1996-001, :on 960111,automatic Isolation of RCIC Sys During Surveillance Testing Occurred Due to Less than Adequate Attention to Details.Counseled Technician & Held Team Meetings to Discuss Event |
- on 960111,automatic Isolation of RCIC Sys During Surveillance Testing Occurred Due to Less than Adequate Attention to Details.Counseled Technician & Held Team Meetings to Discuss Event
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000353/LER-1996-001-02, :on 960220,condition Prohibited by TS in That Two Independent SGTS Inoperable Due to Personnel Error. Counseled EO & Conducted Operator Standdown Meetings to Discuss Event |
- on 960220,condition Prohibited by TS in That Two Independent SGTS Inoperable Due to Personnel Error. Counseled EO & Conducted Operator Standdown Meetings to Discuss Event
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000352/LER-1996-002, :on 960118,unit Operated in Excess of 100% Rated Power Due to Core Thermal Power Calculation Methodology Error.Reactor Heat Balance Revised |
- on 960118,unit Operated in Excess of 100% Rated Power Due to Core Thermal Power Calculation Methodology Error.Reactor Heat Balance Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000353/LER-1996-002-02, :on 960315,ESFA Occurred Due to Loss of Power to Rps/Ups Power Distribution Panel.Caused by Inadvertent Actuation of Underfrequency Relay.Created Necessary Addl Physical Barriers Arounds Units 1 & 2 |
- on 960315,ESFA Occurred Due to Loss of Power to Rps/Ups Power Distribution Panel.Caused by Inadvertent Actuation of Underfrequency Relay.Created Necessary Addl Physical Barriers Arounds Units 1 & 2
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000353/LER-1996-003-02, :on 960314,failed to Perform Accelerated Surveillance Testing of Unit 2 EDG Due to Inadequate Evaluation Program.Reviewed & Enhanced Program & Associated Implementing Documents for Failure Evaluations |
- on 960314,failed to Perform Accelerated Surveillance Testing of Unit 2 EDG Due to Inadequate Evaluation Program.Reviewed & Enhanced Program & Associated Implementing Documents for Failure Evaluations
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000352/LER-1996-003, :on 960204,ESFA Occurred Due to Loss of Power to Rps/Ups Power Distribution Panel Caused by Spurious Actuation of Underfrequency Relay.Replaced Relay |
- on 960204,ESFA Occurred Due to Loss of Power to Rps/Ups Power Distribution Panel Caused by Spurious Actuation of Underfrequency Relay.Replaced Relay
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000353/LER-1996-004-02, :on 960514,reactor Scram Resulted from Main Generator Lockout Due to Actuation of Voltz/Hertz Relay. Caused by Inadequate Design Change Package.Relay 359/381A Drawing Corrected & Relays Inspected |
- on 960514,reactor Scram Resulted from Main Generator Lockout Due to Actuation of Voltz/Hertz Relay. Caused by Inadequate Design Change Package.Relay 359/381A Drawing Corrected & Relays Inspected
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000352/LER-1996-004, :on 960206,reactor Scram Signal Occurred While in Hot Shutdown Due to Operator Error During Depressurization.Provided Briefing Sheet to Operations Managers |
- on 960206,reactor Scram Signal Occurred While in Hot Shutdown Due to Operator Error During Depressurization.Provided Briefing Sheet to Operations Managers
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) | | 05000353/LER-1996-005-02, :on 960527,automatic Actuation of ESF Occurred. Caused by Burnt Circuit Board Trace on Relay Board.Radiation Monitor Satisfactorily Tested & Returned |
- on 960527,automatic Actuation of ESF Occurred. Caused by Burnt Circuit Board Trace on Relay Board.Radiation Monitor Satisfactorily Tested & Returned
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000352/LER-1996-005, :on 960207,daily RECW Sys Fluid Sample Not Obtained & Analyzed within 24 H as Required by TS 3.3.7.1. Caused by Personnel Error & Inadequate Chemistry Section Sampling Program.Program Revised |
- on 960207,daily RECW Sys Fluid Sample Not Obtained & Analyzed within 24 H as Required by TS 3.3.7.1. Caused by Personnel Error & Inadequate Chemistry Section Sampling Program.Program Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000352/LER-1996-006-01, Forwards LER 96-006-01 Re Multiple Instances of Loss of Safety Function of Control Room Emergency Fresh Air Sys, Resulting in Operating Conditions Prohibited by Tech Specs | Forwards LER 96-006-01 Re Multiple Instances of Loss of Safety Function of Control Room Emergency Fresh Air Sys, Resulting in Operating Conditions Prohibited by Tech Specs | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000352/LER-1996-006, :on 960207,control Room Emergency Fresh Air Sys Declared Inoperable.Caused by Flow Switch Coordination Deficiency.Flow Switches Adjusted,Station Guidance Revised & Site Staff Training Performed |
- on 960207,control Room Emergency Fresh Air Sys Declared Inoperable.Caused by Flow Switch Coordination Deficiency.Flow Switches Adjusted,Station Guidance Revised & Site Staff Training Performed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000353/LER-1996-006-02, :on 961202,inadvertent Start of D21 Edg,An ESF During Surveillance Testing Was Noted.Caused by Malfunction of Test Switch Box.Test Box Was Repaired & Tested & Generic Implications of Event Was Evaluated |
- on 961202,inadvertent Start of D21 Edg,An ESF During Surveillance Testing Was Noted.Caused by Malfunction of Test Switch Box.Test Box Was Repaired & Tested & Generic Implications of Event Was Evaluated
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation | | 05000352/LER-1996-007, :on 960220,trip of FPC Pumps Resulted in Loss of Core Circulaton & Decay Heat Removal.Caused by Insufficient Procedural Guidance.C/A:Assessment Performed |
- on 960220,trip of FPC Pumps Resulted in Loss of Core Circulaton & Decay Heat Removal.Caused by Insufficient Procedural Guidance.C/A:Assessment Performed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) | | 05000353/LER-1996-007-02, :on 961206,manual Scram Occurred Due to Leak in Main Turbine EHC Sys.Caused by Failure of Pressure Switch Support Bracket & Tubing.Replaced Failed Bracket & Tubing & Performed Walkdown of Main Steam Sys |
- on 961206,manual Scram Occurred Due to Leak in Main Turbine EHC Sys.Caused by Failure of Pressure Switch Support Bracket & Tubing.Replaced Failed Bracket & Tubing & Performed Walkdown of Main Steam Sys
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) | | 05000353/LER-1996-008-01, :on 961214,two Closed Primary Containment Isolation Valves Were Discovered W/Motor Operator Breaker Closed.Caused by Personnel Error.Procedure GP-2 Will Be Revised to Separate Specific Steps |
- on 961214,two Closed Primary Containment Isolation Valves Were Discovered W/Motor Operator Breaker Closed.Caused by Personnel Error.Procedure GP-2 Will Be Revised to Separate Specific Steps
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000353/LER-1996-008, Forwards LER 96-008-00 Which Documents Event That Occurred at Lgs,Unit 2 on 961214.Commitment Made within Ltr,Listed | Forwards LER 96-008-00 Which Documents Event That Occurred at Lgs,Unit 2 on 961214.Commitment Made within Ltr,Listed | | | 05000352/LER-1996-008, :on 960303,HPCI,ESFA & Condition Which Could Have Prevented Intended Safety Function Occurred Due to Personnel Error.Issued Event Training Bulletin to All I&C Technicians by 960415 |
- on 960303,HPCI,ESFA & Condition Which Could Have Prevented Intended Safety Function Occurred Due to Personnel Error.Issued Event Training Bulletin to All I&C Technicians by 960415
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000352/LER-1996-009-01, :on 960422,main Steam System Safety Relief Valve Setpoint Drift Occurred.Caused by Corrosion Induced Bonding Between Pilot Disc & Seat.Installed Special Modified Pilot Disc in Several SRVs |
- on 960422,main Steam System Safety Relief Valve Setpoint Drift Occurred.Caused by Corrosion Induced Bonding Between Pilot Disc & Seat.Installed Special Modified Pilot Disc in Several SRVs
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000353/LER-1996-009-03, :on 961224,unit Scram & Reactor Protection Sys Actuation Occurred Due to Failure of Bill Joint That Connects Recirculation Pump Motor Generator Set Scoop Tube to Tube Positioner.Failed Ball Joint Was Replaced |
- on 961224,unit Scram & Reactor Protection Sys Actuation Occurred Due to Failure of Bill Joint That Connects Recirculation Pump Motor Generator Set Scoop Tube to Tube Positioner.Failed Ball Joint Was Replaced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000353/LER-1996-009, Forwards LER 96-009-00,documenting Event That Occurred at Limerick Generating Station,Unit 2 on 961224.LER Is Being Submitted Pursuant to Requirements of 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(iv) | Forwards LER 96-009-00,documenting Event That Occurred at Limerick Generating Station,Unit 2 on 961224.LER Is Being Submitted Pursuant to Requirements of 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(iv) | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation | | 05000352/LER-1996-009, :on 960314,five of Six as-found Setpoint Tests on Main Steam Sys SRVs Found Outside Required Pressure Ranges.Caused by Setpoint Drift Due to Corrosion Induced Bonding.Modified Pilot Disc Installed in SRVs |
- on 960314,five of Six as-found Setpoint Tests on Main Steam Sys SRVs Found Outside Required Pressure Ranges.Caused by Setpoint Drift Due to Corrosion Induced Bonding.Modified Pilot Disc Installed in SRVs
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000352/LER-1996-010, :on 960423,discovered Two Remote Shutdown Panel (RSP) Control Circuits Inoperable.Caused by Inadequate Procedures.Rsp Surveillance Test Procedures Revised by 960731 and RSP Cleaned by 960731 |
- on 960423,discovered Two Remote Shutdown Panel (RSP) Control Circuits Inoperable.Caused by Inadequate Procedures.Rsp Surveillance Test Procedures Revised by 960731 and RSP Cleaned by 960731
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000352/LER-1996-011, :on 960425,manual Operation of CREFAS Sys Resulted from Initiation of Toxic Chemical Detection Sys. Caused by Insufficient Guidance in Planning Process.Work Packages for Cleaning & Sealing Reviewed |
- on 960425,manual Operation of CREFAS Sys Resulted from Initiation of Toxic Chemical Detection Sys. Caused by Insufficient Guidance in Planning Process.Work Packages for Cleaning & Sealing Reviewed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000352/LER-1996-012, :on 921103,identified Improper Fuse Sizing. Caused by Personnel Error.Approved Design Change Re Proper Fuse Coordination & Reviewed Modifications Associated W/Fuse Ratings |
- on 921103,identified Improper Fuse Sizing. Caused by Personnel Error.Approved Design Change Re Proper Fuse Coordination & Reviewed Modifications Associated W/Fuse Ratings
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000352/LER-1996-013, :on 960521,Unit 1 Reactor Scram Occurred.Caused by Inadequate Procedural Guidance & Undetermined Equipment Malfunction.Procedure Will Be Revised to Ensure Appropriate Barriers,In Place to Minimize Risk of Scram |
- on 960521,Unit 1 Reactor Scram Occurred.Caused by Inadequate Procedural Guidance & Undetermined Equipment Malfunction.Procedure Will Be Revised to Ensure Appropriate Barriers,In Place to Minimize Risk of Scram
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000352/LER-1996-014, :on 960702,discovered Improperly Controlled Safeguards Information.Cause Undeterminate.Corrective Actions Will Be Provided by 960930 |
- on 960702,discovered Improperly Controlled Safeguards Information.Cause Undeterminate.Corrective Actions Will Be Provided by 960930
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function | | 05000352/LER-1996-015, :on 960726,failure to Maintain Equipment Needed for Operator Actions to Assure Fire Safe SD Capability. Caused by Unclear Ownership & Accountability of Procedures. Interim Procedure Revs Implemented |
- on 960726,failure to Maintain Equipment Needed for Operator Actions to Assure Fire Safe SD Capability. Caused by Unclear Ownership & Accountability of Procedures. Interim Procedure Revs Implemented
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000352/LER-1996-016, :on 960725,core Thermal Power Exceeded Licensed Power Limit During Power Transient.Caused by Defective EHC Sys Component & Reactor Scram.Defective Primary Frequency/ Voltage Converter Replaced & Calibration Performed |
- on 960725,core Thermal Power Exceeded Licensed Power Limit During Power Transient.Caused by Defective EHC Sys Component & Reactor Scram.Defective Primary Frequency/ Voltage Converter Replaced & Calibration Performed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000352/LER-1996-017, :on 960820,4 EDGs Inoperable Resulting from Separate Crankcase Pressurization Events.Caused by Plugging of Exhaust Stack Bird Screens by Rust Debris in Stream Gas Flow.Exhaust Stacks Scraped,Cleaned & Vacuumed |
- on 960820,4 EDGs Inoperable Resulting from Separate Crankcase Pressurization Events.Caused by Plugging of Exhaust Stack Bird Screens by Rust Debris in Stream Gas Flow.Exhaust Stacks Scraped,Cleaned & Vacuumed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000352/LER-1996-018-01, Forwards LER 96-018-01 Which Discusses Event That Occurred on 960925 Re Inoperability of HPCI Sys Due to Loss of HPCI Turbine Speed Signal Caused by Loose Speed Sensor Connector | Forwards LER 96-018-01 Which Discusses Event That Occurred on 960925 Re Inoperability of HPCI Sys Due to Loss of HPCI Turbine Speed Signal Caused by Loose Speed Sensor Connector | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function | | 05000352/LER-1996-018, :on 960925,single Train HPCI Sys Was Declared Inoperable Due to Loose Signal Cable Connector.Connector Was Replaced on 970102 & Common HPCI Turbine Maint Procedures Have Been Revised |
- on 960925,single Train HPCI Sys Was Declared Inoperable Due to Loose Signal Cable Connector.Connector Was Replaced on 970102 & Common HPCI Turbine Maint Procedures Have Been Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000352/LER-1996-019, :on 961026,capability to Reject Electrical Load of RHR Pump Not Fully Verified.Caused by Inadequate Test Procedure.Tests Will Be Revised Prior to Next Performance & TS Change Request Is Being Pursued |
- on 961026,capability to Reject Electrical Load of RHR Pump Not Fully Verified.Caused by Inadequate Test Procedure.Tests Will Be Revised Prior to Next Performance & TS Change Request Is Being Pursued
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000352/LER-1996-020, :on 961205,primary Containment Isolation Valves Inadvertently Closed Due to Personnel Error.Reopened Valves & Counseled Individual Involved on Work Techniques |
- on 961205,primary Containment Isolation Valves Inadvertently Closed Due to Personnel Error.Reopened Valves & Counseled Individual Involved on Work Techniques
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000352/LER-1996-021-01, Forwards LER 96-021-01 Re Ability to Achieve Safe Shutdown in Event of Fire as Provided by Fire Protection Program | Forwards LER 96-021-01 Re Ability to Achieve Safe Shutdown in Event of Fire as Provided by Fire Protection Program | | | 05000352/LER-1996-021, :on 841026,determined Fire Safe Shutdown Made in Fire Safe Shutdown Repair Would Not Function as Desired Due to Incorrect Assumption.Revised Fire Safe Shutdown Procedures |
- on 841026,determined Fire Safe Shutdown Made in Fire Safe Shutdown Repair Would Not Function as Desired Due to Incorrect Assumption.Revised Fire Safe Shutdown Procedures
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000352/LER-1996-022-01, Forwards LER 96-022-01 Re Event Which Occurred on 961102 Re Amount of Fuel Oil Contained in D14 EDG Fuel Oil Storage Tank.Challenging Method for Determining Tank Oil Level Resulted in Operator Obtaining an Incorrect Level Re | Forwards LER 96-022-01 Re Event Which Occurred on 961102 Re Amount of Fuel Oil Contained in D14 EDG Fuel Oil Storage Tank.Challenging Method for Determining Tank Oil Level Resulted in Operator Obtaining an Incorrect Level Reading | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000352/LER-1996-022, :on 961102,D14 EDG Was Declared Inoperable Due to Low Fuel Oil in Storage Tank.Caused by Challenging Method for Determining Tank Level.Increased Operator Awareness of Potential for Error Is Being Utilized |
- on 961102,D14 EDG Was Declared Inoperable Due to Low Fuel Oil in Storage Tank.Caused by Challenging Method for Determining Tank Level.Increased Operator Awareness of Potential for Error Is Being Utilized
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000352/LER-1996-023, :on 950403,FPS Surveillance Tests Not Performed.Caused by Personnel Error.Individuals Involved Disciplined & New Supervisor Assigned to Onsite Fire Protection Group |
- on 950403,FPS Surveillance Tests Not Performed.Caused by Personnel Error.Individuals Involved Disciplined & New Supervisor Assigned to Onsite Fire Protection Group
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) |
|