05000333/LER-2017-001, Vent Line Socket Weld Failure
| ML17072A041 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | FitzPatrick  |
| Issue date: | 03/13/2017 |
| From: | Brian Sullivan Entergy Nuclear Northeast, Entergy Nuclear Operations |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| JAFP-17-0016 LER 17-001-00 | |
| Download: ML17072A041 (6) | |
| Event date: | |
|---|---|
| Report date: | |
| Reporting criterion: | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii) |
| 3332017001R00 - NRC Website | |
text
-===* Entergy JAFP-17-0016 March 13, 2017 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555-0001
Subject:
Dear Sir or Madam:
LER: 2017-001, Vent Line Socket Weld Failure James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Docket No. 50-333 License No. DPR-59 Entergy Nuclear Northeast Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
James A. FitzPatrick NPP P.O. Box 110 Lycoming, NY 13093 Tel 315-349-6024 Fax 315-349-6480 Brian R. Sullivan Site Vice President - JAF This report is submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii), as a condition of the nuclear plant, including its principle safety barriers, being seriously degraded.
There are no new regulatory commitments contained in this report.
Questions concerning this report may be addressed to Mr. William Drews, Regulatory Assurance Manager, at (315) 349-6562.
Sincerely, B~
(_ ~
_f.,... _s~M)_,v._.._ \\
Site Vice President BRS/WD/ds
Enclosure:
LER: 2017-001, Vent Line Socket Weld Failure cc:
USNRC, Region I Administrator USNRC, Project Manager USNRC, Resident Inspector INPO Records Center (ICES)
NRC FORM 366 (06-2016)
NRC FORM 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (06-2016)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
APPROVED BY OMB: NO. 3150-0104 EXPIRES: 10/31/2018
, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the information collection.
- 3. LER NUMBER James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant 05000 - 333 YEAR SEQUENTIAL NUMBER REV N0.
2017
- - 001
- - 00 Page 3 of 5
Event Analysis
The allowable RCS operational leakage limits are based on the predicted and experimentally observed behavior of pipe cracks. The normally expected background leakage due to equipment design and the detection capability of the instrumentation for determining system leakage were also considered. The evidence from experiments suggests that, for leakage even greater than the specified unidentified leakage limits, the probability is small that the imperfection or crack associated with such leakage would grow rapidly.
The unidentified leakage flow limit allows time for corrective action before the RCPB could be significantly compromised. The 5 gpm limit is a small fraction of the calculated flow from a critical crack in the primary system piping. Crack behavior from experimental programs show that leakage rates much greater than 5 gpm precede crack instability.
Sources of identified and unidentified leakage in the drywell are classified by the drain sump to which leakage is directed. Should the time to pumpdown exceed preset limits an abnormal amount of leakage from one of the sump services is indicated. Increased amounts of identified or unidentified leakage will be noted by pump out alarms in the control room. In addition, the drywell sump monitoring system for the floor drain sump and equipment drain sump uses flow integrators to monitor the leakage. The two flow integrators, one for the equipment drain sump and the other for the floor drain sump, comprise the basic instrument system for quantifying leakage inside the drywell. The control room operator has the capability of trending the daily volumes pumped from the drywell sumps by means of flow integrators located in the Control Room. The unidentified leakage trends were reviewed for Cycle 22. The review confirmed that the TS LCO 3.4.4 RCS operational leakage limits were met for the entire Operating Cycle 22.
Cause
An apparent cause evaluation was conducted in accordance with the JAF Corrective Action Program. The Apparent Cause of the event was determined to be high cycle fatigue (HCF) due to vibration stress. The design of the vent piping and resonance frequency of the RWR pumps at low flow contributed to the vibration stress.
The subject vent piping was redesigned in 2002 to address cracking in the fittings caused by thermal movement (reference Similar Events section). A pipe support was modified by changing a U-bolt to a lateral restraint. This solution resolved the thermal movement issue, but created a new cantilever branch line.
Cantilever branch lines are typically two inch diameter or less, and fixed to a larger pipe on one end with the opposite end unsupported. The connection to the larger pipe is usually to a sockolet or half coupling fitting. All loads applied to a cantilever branch line are resisted by the connection of the branch to the larger pipe. The applied loads (e.g., deadweight, thermal, seismic) create bending moments in the pipe that increase to a maximum value at the connection to the larger pipe. If all welds are of equal quality, size, and profile, the socket weld at the connection to the sockolet is the most prone to failure since it resists the greatest load. For this reason, the welds at the sockolet are typically a more robust weld profile. The vent line did not have the enhanced 2:1 weld profile on the socket weld connections, which is desirable when the line may be subject to vibration. In addition, the smaller (standard) weld profiles have less resistance to vibration stress and HCF.
Note that vibration is not a design basis load, and is not accounted for in the plants piping design. This piping was properly configured and supported such that it satisfied all applicable design loading conditions (ie.
deadweight, pressure, thermal, seismic). U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (06-2016)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
CONTINUATION SHEET APPROVED BY OMB: NO. 3150-0104 EXPIRES: 10/31/2018
, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the information collection.
- 3. LER NUMBER James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant 05000 - 333 YEAR SEQUENTIAL NUMBER REV N0.
2017
- - 001
- - 00 Page 4 of 5 JAF operated the RWR pumps at lower flow for an extended period of time during the previous operating cycle. This condition was determined to be a contributing factor because the vane pass frequency of the RWR pump coincides with the vent line resonance frequency with the RWR pump operating at lower pump speeds.
Based on this condition, the 02-2MOV-43A vent line likely experienced an increased number of vibration cycles with vibration stress in the range of the piping endurance limit thus leading to high cycle fatigue failure of the socket weld.
Similar Events
Internal A condition report initiated on October 30, 2000 documented cracks in fittings on the 02-2MOV-43A vent piping. The cause was determined to be excessive thermal stress in the piping due to pipe support binding. A walkdown of common lines showed no bent pipes or support damage. Since the configuration of the common lines allowed for significantly more flexibility than the line with the cracked fittings, the absorbed thermal growth resulted in less stress in these lines. Corrective actions included replacement of a U-bolt with a lateral restraint pipe support.
External Hope Creek Generating Station, Unit 1: LER 2013-003-1, Through-wall flaw discovered on Residual Heat Removal Shutdown Cooling Return Vent Line Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1: LER 2014-002-0, Through-wall Leak on High Pressure Injection A Train Root Valve MU-V-1034 Socket Weld FAILED COMPONENT IDENTIFICATION:
Manufacturer:
N/A Manufacturer Model Number:
N/A NPRDS Manufacturer Code:
N/A NPRDS Component Code:
N/A FitzPatrick Component ID:
N/A Note that the leak originated from a failed socket weld, which is not assigned component identifiers.
Corrective Actions
Completed Actions and Extent of Condition (EOC)
Perform Code Case N-666 weld overlay repair on 02-2MOV-43A vent line leak location (45 degree elbow).
Install new Pre-fabricated Vent Line section (downstream of the repaired 45 elbow) with 2:1 weld reinforcements on 02-2MOV-43A.
Add new Tie-Back Support to Vent Line.
Perform 2:1 Socket Weld Buildups on 02-2MOV-43B, -53A, -53B Vent Lines, and -53A Drain Line (EOC).
Perform VT1 Line inspection of pipes/socket welds Future Actions Investigate cost/benefit of a modification for eliminating the 02-2MOV-43A/B & -53A/B vent lines. U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (06-2016)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
CONTINUATION SHEET APPROVED BY OMB: NO. 3150-0104 EXPIRES: 10/31/2018
, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the information collection.
- 3. LER NUMBER James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant 05000 - 333 YEAR SEQUENTIAL NUMBER REV N0.
2017
- - 001
- - 00 Page 5 of 5
Safety Significance
Actual Consequences There were no actual consequences of this event relative to nuclear, industrial, or radiological safety.
Potential Consequences Accidents that could result in the release of radioactive material directly into the primary containment are the result of postulated Reactor Coolant System pipe breaks inside the drywell. All possibilities for pipe break sizes and locations have been investigated including the severance of small lines, the main steam lines upstream and downstream of the flow restrictors, and the recirculation loop lines. The most severe Reactor Coolant System effects and the greatest release of radioactive material to the primary containment results from a complete circumferential break of one of the recirculation loop lines. The design basis accident analyses that have been performed for JAF demonstrate that all accident scenarios remain within the 10 CFR 100 dose limits.
The potential safety significance of this event is considered minor. The safety significance of RCS leakage from the RCPB varies widely depending on the source, rate, and duration. The event discussed herein resulted in TS LCO 3.4.4 not being met due to RCPB leakage; however, the unidentified leakage limits were not exceeded during the previous operating cycle. This ensures that all accident analyses radiation release assumptions remain bounding for this event. In addition, quantitative information is available in the control room to permit operators to take corrective action should the leak have worsened to the point of being detrimental to the safety of the facility or public.
References Condition Report: CR-JAF-2000-05520 Condition Report: CR-JAF-2017-00245 Equipment Apparent Cause Evaluation JAF Technical Specification and Bases