:on 980323,inadequate Testing of Salem Unit 1 Containment Air Locks Resulted in Entering TS 3.0.3.Caused by less-than-adequate Work Practices During Replacement of Equalizing Valve.Salem Unit 2 Airlocks Were Inspected| ML18106A561 |
| Person / Time |
|---|
| Site: |
Salem  |
|---|
| Issue date: |
04/20/1998 |
|---|
| From: |
Enrique Villar Public Service Enterprise Group |
|---|
| To: |
|
|---|
| Shared Package |
|---|
| ML18106A560 |
List: |
|---|
| References |
|---|
| LER-98-008, LER-98-8, NUDOCS 9804270107 |
| Download: ML18106A561 (5) |
|
Similar Documents at Salem |
|---|
|
text
NRC FORM 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY OMB NO. 3150-0104 (4-95)
EXPIRES 04/30/98 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WITH THIS MANDATORY INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST: 50.0 HRS.
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
REPORTED LESSONS LEARNED ARE INCORPORATED INTO THE LICENSING PROCESS AND FED BACK TO INDUSTRY.
FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE INFORMATION (See reverse for required number of AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (HI F33), U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, DC 2055!HI001, AND TO digits/characters for each block)
THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (3150-0104), OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, WASHINGTON, DC 20503.
FACILITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUllDER (2)
PAGE (3)
SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT 1 05000272 1of5 TITLE (4)
INADEQUATE TESTING OF THE SALEM UNIT 1 CONTAINMENT AIR LOCKS RESULTED IN ENTERING TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION 3.0.3.
EVENT DATE (5)
LER NUMBER (6)
REPORT DATE (7)
OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (8)
I FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR SEQUENTIAL I REVISION MONTH DAY YEAR NUMBER NUMBER Salem Generating Station Unit 2 05000311 03 23 98 98 08 00 04 98 FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER 05000 OPERATING THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR §: (Check one or more) (11)
MODE(9) 5 20.2201(b) 20.2203(a)(2)(v) x 50. 73(a)(2)(i)
- 50. 73(a)(2)(viii)
POWER 20.2203(a)(1) 20.2203(a)(3)(i)
- 50. 73(a)(2)(ii)
- 50. 73(a)(2)(x)
LEVEL (10) 0 20.2203(a)(2)(i) 20.2203(a)(3)(ii)
- 50. 73(a)(2)(iii) 73.71 20.2203(a)(2)(ii) 20.2203(a)(4)
- 50. 73(a)(2)(iv)
OTHER 20.2203(a)(2)(iii) 50.36(c)(1)
- 50. 73(a)(2)(v)
Spec~in Abstract below or in C Form 366A 20.2203(a)(2)(iv) 50.36(c)(2)
- 50. 73(a)(2)(vii)
LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)
NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include Area Code)
E. H. Villar, Station Licensing Engineer (609) 339-5456 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT (13)
CAUSE
SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABLE
~I~li~~~~f ~~~i~~~i
CAUSE
SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABLE TO NPRDS
~i~~ ~ ll~~~~l~ ~~jlj~ li j~ fil TONPRDS r
m~~i~~~i~~m~~r 1
11111111111111111-SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14)
EXPECTED MONTH DAY YEAR IYES x1NO SUBMISSION
. (If yes, complete EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE).
DATE (15)
ABSTRACT (Limitto 1400 spaces, i.e., approximately 15 single-spaced typewritten Imes) (16)
During a periodic performance of Sl.RA-IS.ZZ-OOOl(Q) I "Type B Mechanical Penetration Leak Rate Testing", In-Service inspection personnel noted that the Schrader valve that controls the air supply to the exterior door was not fulfilling its intended function. This condition meant that no air was being supplied to the exterior door seal during the performance of the leak rate test under procedure Sl.OP-ST.CAN-0004 (Q)"Containment Air Lock Local Leak Rate Test.,,
This resulted in a failure to meet the surveillance requirements of Technical Specification 3.6.1.3. for both Unit 1 containment air locks, and Technical Specification 3.0.3 was entered.
The most probable cause is attributed to less-than-adequate practices during the replacement of the equalizing valve in accordance with a design change package.
Corrective actions taken were to correct the Schrader valve linkage for both Salem Unit 1 containment air locks.
The leak rate test was performed satisfactorily, and the Salem Unit 2 airlocks were inspected and found to be working properly.
This condition represents a reportable condition under the provisions of 10CFR50.73 (a) (2) ( i)
(B) 9804270107 980420 PDR ADOCK 05000272 S
PDR
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER).
TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2)
LER NUMBER (6)
PAGE (3) 05000272 YEAR I SEQUENTIAL I REVISION NUMBER NUMBER 2
OF 5
SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT 1 98 --
08 00 TEXT (If more space is required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366A) (17)
PLANT AND SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION
Westinghouse - Pressurized Water Reactor Containment Air Lock {NH/AL}*
- Energy Industry Identification System (EIIS) codes and component function identifier codes appear in the text as {SS/CCC}.
IDENTIFICATION OF OCCURRENCE Identification Date: March 23, 1998.
Reportability Date: March 23, 1998.
Report Date: April 22, 1998.
CONDITIONS PRIOR TO OCCURRENCE Unit 1:
Mode 5 There were no structures, components, or systems that were inoperable at the start of the event that contributed to the event.
DESCRIPTION OF OCCURRENCE On March 23, 1998, during a periodic performance of Sl.RA-IS.ZZ-OOOl(Q),
"Type B Mechanical Penetration Leak Rate Testing", In-Service Inspection (ISI) personnel noted that the Schrader valve that controls the air supply to the 100 foot elevation exterior containment air lock door was not functioning properly.
The 3-way Schrader valve is a vendor-supplied shutoff valve downstream of isolation valve 1CA1722 (control air isolation valve for the Unit 1 100 foot elevation air lock).
The Schrader valve is engaged by a mechanical arm which is linked to the handwheel for the exterior containment air lock door such that the Schrader valve is open when the exterior containment air lock door is closed.
The Schrader valve when engaged by the door interlock mechanism (door full closed) allows control air to be supplied to both containment air lock doors (inner and outer doors).
Specifically, air is supplied to the space between the double seal and the knife edge that presses against them.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2)
LER NUMBER (6)
PAGE (3) 05000272 YEAR I SEQUENTIAL I REVISION NUMBER NUMBER 3
OF 5
SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT 1 98 --
08 00 TEXT (If more space is required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366A) (17)
DESCRIPTION OF OCCURRENCE (cont'd)
During the testing of the Unit 1 air locks, ISI personnel identified that:
(1) one of the fasteners on the mechanical linkage was loose, and (2) one of the mechanical arms was bent such that a hard contact with the Schrader valve was not being made when the door was closed.
In this condition, the interlock mechanism was not engaging the Schrader valve.
Therefore, the outer containment air lock door seal was not being tested during the performance of the leak rate test under procedure Sl.RA-IS.ZZ-OOOl(Q), and the performance of Sl.OP-ST.CAN-0004(Q),"Containment Air Lock Local Leak Rate Test."
As a result of this condition, the Schrader valve for the 130 foot elevation containment air lock was inspected and a similar condition was identified by ISI personnel.
These conditions resulted in a ~ailure to meet the surveillance requirements of Technical Specification 3.6.1.3.
Technical Specification 3.6.1.3 requires each containment air lock to be operable in Modes 1 thro~gh 4.
With an inoperable air lock, TS requires that the air lock be restored to operable within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or be in HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.
Since TS 3.6.1.3 Action does not allow more than one door to be inoperable, on March 23 at approximately 1400 hours0.0162 days <br />0.389 hours <br />0.00231 weeks <br />5.327e-4 months <br />, the control room operators declared both containment air locks inoperable, and entered Technical Specification 3.0.3.
At approximately 1447 hours0.0167 days <br />0.402 hours <br />0.00239 weeks <br />5.505835e-4 months <br />, on the same day, repairs to the air locks were performed, the containment air locks were retested satisfactorily in accordance with the provisions of Technical Specifications 4.0.3, and Technical Specifications 3.0.3 was exited.
This condition, however, represents a reportable condition under the provisions of 10CFR50. 73 (a) (2) (i) (B)
APPARENT CAUSE OF OCCURRENCE The most probable root cause is attributed to less-than-adequate work practices during the replacement of the equalizing valve.
The Schrader valve is located inside the airlock in the upper right corner (facing the exterior door).
It is directly below the equalizing valve.
The Schrader valve is relatively protected from incidental contact due to normal traffic through the airlock.
Therefore, it is highly unlikely that the observed condition could have occurred as a result of incidental contact by personnel while passing through the airlock.
Investigation into this event, however, identified that the equalizing valve had been recently replaced in accordance with Design Change Package (DCP) 1EE00130 and work order 950905417 for both Unit 1 airlocks.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2)
LER NUMBER (6) 05000272 YEAR I SEQUENTIAL I REVISION NUMBER NUMBER SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT 1 98 --
08 00 TEXT (If more space is required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366A) (17)
APPARENT CAUSE OF OCCURRENCE (cont'd)
PAGE (3) 4 OF 5
This work was completed just prior Unit 1 entering Mode 4.
To replace the equalizing valve, it was necessary to do work on the mechanical linkage.
A review of the DCP required testing indicated that a post modification leak rate test was performed satisfactorily using procedure Sl. RA-IS. ZZ-0001 (Q) on both containment air lock doors.
Less than adequate work practices appeared to have, over time, resulted in the loosening of the fasteners.
The loosening of the fasteners could have allowed the mechanical arm to be out-of-position such that the arm was slightly bent (in a direction parallel to its motion) when the door was closed.
PREVIOUS OCCURRENCES
A review of the LER database for Salem Units 1 and 2 issued in the last two years identified another LER involving containment air locks.
Although not a similar occurrence, it is included for completeness of reporting.
LER 272/96-005-16 "Inadequate Technical Specification Testing -
Containment Airlock Gasket Leakage" was issued on January 21, 1998.
This LER involved the failure to properly implement Technical Specification 4.6.1.3.a.
Specifically, procedure Sl.OP-ST.CAN-0004(Q} contained an acceptance value that was greater than allowed by TS.
The corrective actions taken relative to this LER were appropriate for the identified root cause of LER 272/96-005-16, but would not have been expected to identify or prevent this event.
SAFETY CONSEQUENCES AND IMPLICATIONS
There were no safety consequences associated with this event, and the safety implications of a postulated event were minimal.
Although the containment air lock outer door seals were not being tested, the inner seals were always tested satisfactorily.
Therefore, the containment air locks (inner seal) were able to maintain the overall leakage below the required Technical Specification limits.
Maintaining the overall leakage below the required Technical Specification limits, ensures that the assumptions used in the dose analysis remain valid.
Additionally, because Unit 1 had been shutdown for over two years, the activity contained within the fuel has been demonstrated by Engineering Evaluation to be much lower than the activity expected when compared with a normal refueling outage.
Based on the above, there was no impact to the health and safety of the public.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2)
LER NUMBER (6)
PAGE (3) 05000272 YEAR I SEQUENTIAL I REVISION NUMBER NUMBER SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT 1 98 --
08 00 TEXT (If more space is required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366A) (17)
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
- 1. The Schrader valve linkage was repaired for both Salem Unit 1 containment air locks, and the leak rate test was performed satisfactorily.
- 2. The Salem Unit 2 airlocks were inspected and found to be working properly.
- 3. Additional corrective actions may be taken, as appropriate, upon completion of the level 2 condition report.
5
- 4. This event will be incorporated in the 1998 Maintenance Continuing Training for lessons learned. OF 5
|
|---|
|
|
| | | Reporting criterion |
|---|
| 05000272/LER-1998-001, :on 980116,AFP Internal Flooding Protection Was Installed Incorrectly.Caused by Installation Error During Construction.Pipe Alley Flood Gate counter-weight Was Properly Positioned on 980124 |
- on 980116,AFP Internal Flooding Protection Was Installed Incorrectly.Caused by Installation Error During Construction.Pipe Alley Flood Gate counter-weight Was Properly Positioned on 980124
| | | 05000311/LER-1998-001-01, :on 970705,failed to Meet TS 3.3.3.7 Table 3.3-11 Item 19 -RVLIS.Caused by Test Equipment Had Not Been Evaluated for Effect on Sys Operability.Installation of Isolators Has Been Included in Rev 5 |
- on 970705,failed to Meet TS 3.3.3.7 Table 3.3-11 Item 19 -RVLIS.Caused by Test Equipment Had Not Been Evaluated for Effect on Sys Operability.Installation of Isolators Has Been Included in Rev 5
| | | 05000311/LER-1998-002-01, :on 980129,23 Overtemperature Delta Temperature Channel Found Inoperable.Cause of Event Being Attributed to Human Error.Lead & Lag Switches Were Restored to Correct Positions |
- on 980129,23 Overtemperature Delta Temperature Channel Found Inoperable.Cause of Event Being Attributed to Human Error.Lead & Lag Switches Were Restored to Correct Positions
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000272/LER-1998-002, :on 971217,auxiliary Building Ventilation (Abv) Excess Flow Damper Was Found Wired Open W/Spring Removed. Caused by Personnel Error.Repaired 1ABS8 Damper & Inspected Other Abv Excess Flow Dampers in Abv Sys |
- on 971217,auxiliary Building Ventilation (Abv) Excess Flow Damper Was Found Wired Open W/Spring Removed. Caused by Personnel Error.Repaired 1ABS8 Damper & Inspected Other Abv Excess Flow Dampers in Abv Sys
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000311/LER-1998-003-02, :on 980122,inappropriate Plugging of Tubes R9C60 & R10C60 in Salem Unit 2 Sg,Was Performed.Caused by Failure of Qualification,Verification & Validation Process. Tubes Reviewed to Verify No Others Inappropriately Plugged |
- on 980122,inappropriate Plugging of Tubes R9C60 & R10C60 in Salem Unit 2 Sg,Was Performed.Caused by Failure of Qualification,Verification & Validation Process. Tubes Reviewed to Verify No Others Inappropriately Plugged
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000311/LER-1998-003, Forwards LER 98-003-00 Re Inappropriate Plugging of Tubes R9C60 & R10C60 in Salem Unit 2,SG | Forwards LER 98-003-00 Re Inappropriate Plugging of Tubes R9C60 & R10C60 in Salem Unit 2,SG | | | 05000272/LER-1998-003, :on 980216,inadequate Surveillance Testing of FW Isolation & P-10 SR Block Was Noted.Caused by Inadequate Development of Original Surveillance Tps for Ssps Logic Testing.Revised Ssps Logic Functional Tps |
- on 980216,inadequate Surveillance Testing of FW Isolation & P-10 SR Block Was Noted.Caused by Inadequate Development of Original Surveillance Tps for Ssps Logic Testing.Revised Ssps Logic Functional Tps
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000311/LER-1998-004, :on 980204,failure to Comply W/Ts SR 4.1.3.1.1 Was Noted.Caused by Human Error.Review of Both Units 1 & 2 P250 Computer Points Was Conducted |
- on 980204,failure to Comply W/Ts SR 4.1.3.1.1 Was Noted.Caused by Human Error.Review of Both Units 1 & 2 P250 Computer Points Was Conducted
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000272/LER-1998-004, Corrected LER 98-004-00:on 980302,failure to Comply W/Tss 4.11.1.1.2 & 3.3.3.8 Was Noted.Caused by Organizational Deficiency.Steps Have Been Taken to Correctly Document Safety Factors.Corrects Prior Similar Occurrences | Corrected LER 98-004-00:on 980302,failure to Comply W/Tss 4.11.1.1.2 & 3.3.3.8 Was Noted.Caused by Organizational Deficiency.Steps Have Been Taken to Correctly Document Safety Factors.Corrects Prior Similar Occurrences | | | 05000272/LER-1998-004-01, :on 980302,failure to Perform TS 4.11.1.1.2 & 3.3.3.8 Was Noted.Caused by Organizational Deficiency.Steps Were Taken to Correctly Document Safety Factors |
- on 980302,failure to Perform TS 4.11.1.1.2 & 3.3.3.8 Was Noted.Caused by Organizational Deficiency.Steps Were Taken to Correctly Document Safety Factors
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000272/LER-1998-005-01, :on 980219,inoperability of Twelve EDG Fuel Oil Transfer Pump (FOTP) Noted.Caused by Installation of Incorrect Control Switch.Installed Correct off-auto-manual Switch & Verified Operability of Twelve FOTP |
- on 980219,inoperability of Twelve EDG Fuel Oil Transfer Pump (FOTP) Noted.Caused by Installation of Incorrect Control Switch.Installed Correct off-auto-manual Switch & Verified Operability of Twelve FOTP
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) | | 05000311/LER-1998-005, :on 980211,failure of 2A EDG Turbocharger Was Noted.Caused by Failure of Blade on Turbochargers Rotating Turbine Disc.Damaged Turbocharger on 2A EDG Was Replaced W/ Refurbished Turbocharger |
- on 980211,failure of 2A EDG Turbocharger Was Noted.Caused by Failure of Blade on Turbochargers Rotating Turbine Disc.Damaged Turbocharger on 2A EDG Was Replaced W/ Refurbished Turbocharger
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000272/LER-1998-005, Corrected LER 98-005-00:on 980219,inoperability of 12 Fuel Oil Transfer Pump (Fotp),Noted.Caused by Installation of Incorrect Control Switch.Field Insp Performed to Verify Configuration of Switches for 11,21 & 22 FOTPs | Corrected LER 98-005-00:on 980219,inoperability of 12 Fuel Oil Transfer Pump (Fotp),Noted.Caused by Installation of Incorrect Control Switch.Field Insp Performed to Verify Configuration of Switches for 11,21 & 22 FOTPs | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000311/LER-1998-006-01, :on 980227,incorrect Scaling of First Stage Turbine Impulse Pressure Transmitters Noted.Cause Indeterminate.Implemented Procedure Changes & re-scaled Affected Turbine Impulse Pressure Transmitters |
- on 980227,incorrect Scaling of First Stage Turbine Impulse Pressure Transmitters Noted.Cause Indeterminate.Implemented Procedure Changes & re-scaled Affected Turbine Impulse Pressure Transmitters
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000272/LER-1998-006, :on 980221,ESF Actuation of 11 & 12 Auxiliary Feedwater Pumps Occurred.Caused by Human Error.Operators Promptly Established Feedwater to All SG & Restored Proper Water Levels |
- on 980221,ESF Actuation of 11 & 12 Auxiliary Feedwater Pumps Occurred.Caused by Human Error.Operators Promptly Established Feedwater to All SG & Restored Proper Water Levels
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000311/LER-1998-006, :on 980227,determined Incorrect Scaling Error of First Stage Pressure Transmitter Existed.Caused by Human Error.Revised Setpoint Calculation SC-MS002-01 & Revised Associated Instrument Calibr Database Info |
- on 980227,determined Incorrect Scaling Error of First Stage Pressure Transmitter Existed.Caused by Human Error.Revised Setpoint Calculation SC-MS002-01 & Revised Associated Instrument Calibr Database Info
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000272/LER-1998-007, :on 980218,failure to Establish Containment Integrity (Closure) Prior to Fuel Movement Was Noted.Caused by Failure to Identify & Include Condensate Pot Vent in Appropriate Valve Lineup.Valves Identified |
- on 980218,failure to Establish Containment Integrity (Closure) Prior to Fuel Movement Was Noted.Caused by Failure to Identify & Include Condensate Pot Vent in Appropriate Valve Lineup.Valves Identified
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000311/LER-1998-007, :on 980730,reactor Coolant Instrument Line through-wall Leak Was Noted.Caused by Transgranular Stress Corrosion Cracking.Replaced Affected Tubing.With |
- on 980730,reactor Coolant Instrument Line through-wall Leak Was Noted.Caused by Transgranular Stress Corrosion Cracking.Replaced Affected Tubing.With
| 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000311/LER-1998-007-01, :on 980730,reactor Coolant Instrument Line through-wall Leak Was Noted.Cause of Event Has Not Yet Been Determined.Assembled Root Cause Team & Replaced Affected Tubing |
- on 980730,reactor Coolant Instrument Line through-wall Leak Was Noted.Cause of Event Has Not Yet Been Determined.Assembled Root Cause Team & Replaced Affected Tubing
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000272/LER-1998-008, :on 980323,inadequate Testing of Salem Unit 1 Containment Air Locks Resulted in Entering TS 3.0.3.Caused by less-than-adequate Work Practices During Replacement of Equalizing Valve.Salem Unit 2 Airlocks Were Inspected |
- on 980323,inadequate Testing of Salem Unit 1 Containment Air Locks Resulted in Entering TS 3.0.3.Caused by less-than-adequate Work Practices During Replacement of Equalizing Valve.Salem Unit 2 Airlocks Were Inspected
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000311/LER-1998-008-01, :on 970814,failure to Test 21 & 22 AF 40 Valves in Closed Direction as Required by TS 4.0.5 Was Noted.Caused by Inadequate Design Mod Process.Motor Driven 21/22 AF 40 Valves Were Tested IAW Revised Procedure |
- on 970814,failure to Test 21 & 22 AF 40 Valves in Closed Direction as Required by TS 4.0.5 Was Noted.Caused by Inadequate Design Mod Process.Motor Driven 21/22 AF 40 Valves Were Tested IAW Revised Procedure
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) | | 05000272/LER-1998-009, :on 980405,epoxy Missing from Terminals of H Analyzer Was Noted.Caused by Inadequate Development of Procedure.H Analyzers Were Repaired & Review of Other Safety Related Equipment in Containment Was Performed |
- on 980405,epoxy Missing from Terminals of H Analyzer Was Noted.Caused by Inadequate Development of Procedure.H Analyzers Were Repaired & Review of Other Safety Related Equipment in Containment Was Performed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000311/LER-1998-009-01, :on 980810,failure to Post Continuous Firewatch as Required by Fire Protection Plan Noted.Caused by Failure to Recognize Concurrent Conditions.Continuous Firewatch Was Posted Immediately & Repaired Smoke Detectors |
- on 980810,failure to Post Continuous Firewatch as Required by Fire Protection Plan Noted.Caused by Failure to Recognize Concurrent Conditions.Continuous Firewatch Was Posted Immediately & Repaired Smoke Detectors
| | | 05000272/LER-1998-010, :on 931019,reactor Pressure Vessel Insp Plugs Were Out of Configuration,Was Noted.Caused by Personnel Error.Proper Configuration Was Restored Shortly After Discovery Prior to Entering Mode 2 |
- on 931019,reactor Pressure Vessel Insp Plugs Were Out of Configuration,Was Noted.Caused by Personnel Error.Proper Configuration Was Restored Shortly After Discovery Prior to Entering Mode 2
| 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000311/LER-1998-010-01, :on 980714,determined That Leakage from Boron Injection Tank Exceeded Max Allowable ECCS Leakage from Sources Outside Containment.Caused by Leaking 2SJ404 Manual Sample valve.2SJ404 Valve Repaired |
- on 980714,determined That Leakage from Boron Injection Tank Exceeded Max Allowable ECCS Leakage from Sources Outside Containment.Caused by Leaking 2SJ404 Manual Sample valve.2SJ404 Valve Repaired
| 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000272/LER-1998-011, :on 980505,improper Isolation of Single Cell Battery Charger from 125 Vdc Battery Was Noted.Caused by Inadequate 10CFR50.59 Applicability Review.Placed Procedure SC.MD-CM.ZZ-0024(Q) on Administrative Hold |
- on 980505,improper Isolation of Single Cell Battery Charger from 125 Vdc Battery Was Noted.Caused by Inadequate 10CFR50.59 Applicability Review.Placed Procedure SC.MD-CM.ZZ-0024(Q) on Administrative Hold
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) | | 05000311/LER-1998-011-01, :on 980803,ESFA During a 4KV Automatic Transfer Test Was Noted.Caused by Premature Release of Control Console Pushbutton Due to Inadequate Procedural Step.Revised Procedure |
- on 980803,ESFA During a 4KV Automatic Transfer Test Was Noted.Caused by Premature Release of Control Console Pushbutton Due to Inadequate Procedural Step.Revised Procedure
| | | 05000272/LER-1998-012, :on 980715,potential to Exceed Rating of Piping Due to Isolation of Overpressure Protection Line Was Noted. Caused by Inadequate Procedural Guidance.Appropriate Operations Dept Procedures Have Been Revised |
- on 980715,potential to Exceed Rating of Piping Due to Isolation of Overpressure Protection Line Was Noted. Caused by Inadequate Procedural Guidance.Appropriate Operations Dept Procedures Have Been Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000311/LER-1998-012, :on 980725,noted That Afs Was Operated with Less than Required Number of Operable AFW Pumps.Caused by Improper Procedure Implementation.Runout Protection Pressure Device for 22 AFW Pumps Was Returned to Svc.With |
- on 980725,noted That Afs Was Operated with Less than Required Number of Operable AFW Pumps.Caused by Improper Procedure Implementation.Runout Protection Pressure Device for 22 AFW Pumps Was Returned to Svc.With
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000311/LER-1998-012-01, :on 980725,discovered That Plant Had Operated in Modes 1 & 2 w/twenty-two AFW Pumps Inoperable.Caused by Failure to Restore Pump Runout Protection Pressure Device to Svc.Returned Subject Device to Svc |
- on 980725,discovered That Plant Had Operated in Modes 1 & 2 w/twenty-two AFW Pumps Inoperable.Caused by Failure to Restore Pump Runout Protection Pressure Device to Svc.Returned Subject Device to Svc
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000311/LER-1998-013-01, :on 980820,noted Surveillance of Containment Penetration Overcurrent Protection Devices Missed.Caused by Human Error.Satisfactorily Tested Apprpriate Breakers & Disciplined Involved Personnel.With |
- on 980820,noted Surveillance of Containment Penetration Overcurrent Protection Devices Missed.Caused by Human Error.Satisfactorily Tested Apprpriate Breakers & Disciplined Involved Personnel.With
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000272/LER-1998-013, :on 980806,operation with TS Required Equipment OOS Was Noted.Caused by Human Error.Reviewed Processes & Practices Re Safety Sys Status Control,Procedure Rev & Extra Training.With |
- on 980806,operation with TS Required Equipment OOS Was Noted.Caused by Human Error.Reviewed Processes & Practices Re Safety Sys Status Control,Procedure Rev & Extra Training.With
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) | | 05000311/LER-1998-014, :on 980918,discovered That Fire Barrier Matl for HVAC Ducts Does Not Meet Required Level of Fire Resistance.Cause Indeterminate.Established Appropriate Compensatory Actions for Fire Barriers.With |
- on 980918,discovered That Fire Barrier Matl for HVAC Ducts Does Not Meet Required Level of Fire Resistance.Cause Indeterminate.Established Appropriate Compensatory Actions for Fire Barriers.With
| | | 05000272/LER-1998-014-01, :on 980725,noted Improper Calibr of Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line Radiation Monitor.Caused by Inattention to Detail by Maint Personnel.Channel Calibr Was Successfully Performed on 1R18 on 980821.With |
- on 980725,noted Improper Calibr of Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line Radiation Monitor.Caused by Inattention to Detail by Maint Personnel.Channel Calibr Was Successfully Performed on 1R18 on 980821.With
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000311/LER-1998-015-01, :on 981208,inadvertent Discharge Through RHR Relief Valve During Startup Was Noted.Caused by Operator Performing Too Many Tasks Simultaneously.Appropriate Actions Have Been Taken IAW Policies & Procedures.With |
- on 981208,inadvertent Discharge Through RHR Relief Valve During Startup Was Noted.Caused by Operator Performing Too Many Tasks Simultaneously.Appropriate Actions Have Been Taken IAW Policies & Procedures.With
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000272/LER-1998-015, Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-272/98-12 & 50-311/98-12.Corrective Actions:Discussions with NRC Senior Resident Inspector for Salem Indicated Encl LER 98-015-00 Responsive to NOV | Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-272/98-12 & 50-311/98-12.Corrective Actions:Discussions with NRC Senior Resident Inspector for Salem Indicated Encl LER 98-015-00 Responsive to NOV | | | 05000311/LER-1998-016, :on 981219,ECCS Leakage Was Outside of Design Value.Caused by Leakage Past Seat of 21RH34 Manual Drain. Valve 21RH34 Was Reseated.With |
- on 981219,ECCS Leakage Was Outside of Design Value.Caused by Leakage Past Seat of 21RH34 Manual Drain. Valve 21RH34 Was Reseated.With
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition |
|