05000220/LER-2019-001-01, Automatic Reactor Scram Due to High Reactor Pressure

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Automatic Reactor Scram Due to High Reactor Pressure
ML19211B169
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 07/26/2019
From: Tierney T
Exelon Generation Co
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NMP1L3293 LER 2019-001-01
Download: ML19211B169 (7)


LER-2019-001, Automatic Reactor Scram Due to High Reactor Pressure
Event date:
Report date:
Reporting criterion: 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(B), System Actuation
2202019001R01 - NRC Website

text

NMP1L3293 July 26, 2019 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-63 Docket No. 50-220 10 CFR 50.73

Subject:

NMP1 Licensee Event Report 2019-001, Revision 1, Automatic Reactor Scram Due to High Reactor Pressure The original NMP1 LER 2019-001 was submitted June 13, 2019. Enclosed is NMP1 Licensee Event Report (LER) 2019-001, Revision 1, Automatic Reactor Scram Due to High Reactor Pressure. This revision is to provide additional details on the cause of the event and the corrective actions following completion of the root cause analysis.

There are no regulatory commitments contained in this letter.

Should you have any questions regarding the information in this submittal, please contact Brandon Shultz, Site Regulatory Assurance Manager, at (315) 349-7012.

Respectfully,

~(i_-~

Todd A. Tierney -

. f Plant Manager, Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Exelon Generation Company, LLC TAT/RMD

. Enclosure:

NMP1 Licensee Event Report 2019-001, Revision 1, Automatic Reactor Scram Due to High Reactor Pressure.

cc:

NRC Regional Administrator, Region I NRC Resident Inspector NRC Project Manager

Enclosure NMP1 Licensee Event 2019-001, Revision 1, Automatic Reactor Scram Due to High Reactor Pressure Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-63

NRC FORM 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY 0MB: NO. 3150-0104 EXPIRES: 03/31/2020 (04-2017)'

, the htt12://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1022/r3/)

NRG may not cbnduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the information collection.

3. PAGE Nine Mile Point Unit 1 05000220 1 OF 5
4. TITLE Automatic Reactor Scram due to High Reactor Pressure
5. EVENT DATE
6. LEA NUMBER
7. REPORT DATE
8. OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED I

SEQUENTIAL I REV FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR NUMBER NO.

MONTH DAY YEAR. N/A N/A FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER 04 14 2019 2019 - 001

- 01 07 26 2019 N/A N/A
9. OPERATING MODE
11. THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR §: (Check all that apply}

D 20.2201 (bl D 20.2203(al(3l(il D 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A)

D 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A)

D 20.2201 (dl D 20.22os(aJ(3J(iil D 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B)

D 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B)

N D 20.22os(aJ(1J D 20.22os(a)(4l D so.13(aJ(2J(iiil D 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A)

D 20.22os(a)(2J(il D 50.36(c)(1)(i)(A)

[g] 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A)

D 50.73(a)(2)(x)

10. POWER LEVEL D 20.22os(a)(2)(iil D 50.36(c)(1)(ii)(A)

D 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A)

D 13.11 (al(4l D 20.22os(a)(2J(iiil D so.3s(cl(2l D 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B)

. D 13.11 (a)(sJ D 20.2203(a)(2)(iv)

D so.4s(a)(3l(iil D 50.73(a)(2)(v)(C)

D 13.11(a)(1 l 021 D 20.2203(a)(2)(v)

D 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A)

D 50.73(a)(2)(v)(D)

D 13.11(a)(2Hil D 20.2203(a)(2)(vi)

D 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B)

D 50.73(a)(2)(vii)

D 13.11(a)(2J(iil

1. ::: :

D 50.73(a)(2)(i)(C)

D OTHER Specify in Abstract below or in YEAR 2019

3. LER NUMBER SEQUENTIAL NUMBER 001 C. INOPERABLE STRUCTURES, COMPONENTS, OR SYSTEMS THAT CONTRIBUTED TO THE EVENT:

No other systems, structures, or components contributed to this event.

D. DATES AND APPROXIMATE TIMES OF MAJOR OCCURRENCES AND OPERATOR ACTIONS:

The dates, times, and major occurrences and operator actions for this event are as follows:

April 14, 2019 00:01:15-TSV-13 stroked close 00:01 :41 -TSV-13 opened 00:01 :44-AII Turbine Stop Valves closed 00:02:57 -Bypass Valves start to shut 00:03:16-Reactor Scram on high reactor pressure 00:03: 19-Turbine trip 00:03:20-HPCI initiation signal due to Turbine Trip 00:03:52-HPCI reset

E. METHOD OF DISCOVERY

This event was discovered by Reactor Operators when the reactor scram was received.

F. SAFETY SYSTEM RESPONSES:

All safety systems responded per design.

II. CAUSE OF EVENT

Station personnel did not identify that the Restoring Arm Breakdown (RAB) was incorrectly installed and therefore non-functional. Vendors improperly installed the RAB initially and again in 2015. There is no NMP maintenance strategy to identify the correct installation of the RAB.

Station personnel dispatched had limited maintenance procedural guidance and were unfamiliar with TSV 13 internal bypass mechanism, and therefore unable to recognize the equipment failure when directed to inspect the RAB mechanism. This resulted in ineffective knowledge-based troubleshooting to correct a condition as opposed to corrections with controlled technical guidance and the right expertise.

REV NO.

01

III. ANALYSIS OF THE EVENT

The automatic reactor scram and specified system activation is reportable under 1 O CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B) and 1 O CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), as any event or condition that resulted in manual or automatic action of any of the specified systems listed in 1 O CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(B).

All other plant systems performed per design. Plant parameters, other than the RPV pressure, remained within normal values throughout the event. There was no loss of offsite power to the onsite emergency buses, the HPCI mode of feed and condensate system initiated as designed on the turbine trip signal.

Based on the above discussion, it is concluded that the safety significance of this event is low and the event did not pose a threat to the health and safety of the public or plant personnel.

This event does affect the NRG Regulatory Oversight Process Indicator for unplanned scrams per 7000 hours0.081 days <br />1.944 hours <br />0.0116 weeks <br />0.00266 months <br /> of critical operation.

IV. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

A. ACTION TAKEN TO RETURN AFFECTED SYSTEMS TO PRE-EVENT NORMAL STATUS:

The Restoring Arm Breakdown was returned to the proper position and tested satisfactorily.

B. ACTION TAKEN OR PLANNED TO PREVENT RECURRENCE:

1. Revise Turbine Stop Valve Stroke Time Testing procedure and develop a comprehensive maintenance strategy.
2. Ensure qualified IMO personnel on MHC are proficient in the TSV internal bypass and procedures.

V. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

A. FAILED COMPONENTS:

Turbine Stop Valve (TSV) -13, Restoring Arm Breakdown B. PREVIOUS LERs ON SIMILAR EVENTS:

None REV NO.

01 YEAR 2019 -

SEQUENTIAL NUMBER 001 C. THE ENERGY INDUSTRY IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (EIIS) COMPONENT FUNCTION IDENTIFIER AND SYSTEM NAME OF EACH COMPONENT OR SYSTEM REFERRED TO INTHISLER:

COMPONENT Reactor Pressure Vessel Feedwater Level Control System High Pressure Coolant Injection System Reactor Protection System Turbine Stop Valve Main Turbine IEEE 803 FUNCTION IDENTIFIER RPV N/A N/A N/A PCV TRB IEEE 805 SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION AD JB BJ JC JA TA REV NO.

01 Page _5_ of _5_