05000220/LER-2019-003, Manual Reactor Scram Due to Pressure and Power Oscillations

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Manual Reactor Scram Due to Pressure and Power Oscillations
ML19206A063
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 06/28/2019
From: Jacqueline Thompson
Exelon Generation Co
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NMP1L3292 LER 2019-003-00
Download: ML19206A063 (6)


LER-2019-003, Manual Reactor Scram Due to Pressure and Power Oscillations
Event date:
Report date:
Reporting criterion: 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(B), System Actuation
2202019003R00 - NRC Website

text

'

NMP1L3292 June 28, 2019 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-63 Docket No. 50-220 10 CFR 50.73

Subject:

NMP1 Licensee Event Report 2019-003, Manual Reactor Scram Due to Pressure and Power Oscillations In accordance with the reporting requirements contained in 1 O CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), please find enclosed NMP1 Licensee Event Report (LER) 2019-003, Manual Reactor Scram Due to Pressure and Power Oscillations.

There are no regulatory commitments contained in this letter.

Should you have any questions regarding the information in this submittal, please contact Brandon Shultz, Site Regulatory Assurance Manager, at (315) 349-7012.

Respectfully, Julian C. Thompson Director Site Operations, Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Exelon Generation Company, LLC JCT/KJK

Enclosure:

NMP1 Licensee Event Report 2019-003, Manual Reactor Scram Due to Pressure and Power Oscillations.

cc:

NRC Regional Administrator, Region I NRC Resident Inspector NRC Project Manager

Enclosure NMP1 Licensee Event 2019-003, Manual Reactor Scram Due to Pressure and Power Oscillations Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-63

NRq FORM 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY 0MB: NO. 3150-0104 EXPIRES: 03/31/2020 (04-2017)

, the htt1;1://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1022/r3l)

NRG may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the information collection.

3. PAGE Nine Mile Point Unit 1 05000220 1 OF 4
4. TITLE Manual Reactor Scram due to Pressure and Power Oscillations
5. EVENT DATE
6. LEA NUMBER
7. REPORT DATE
8. OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED YEAR I SEQUENTIAL I REV FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER MONTH DAY YEAR NUMBER NO.

MONTH DAY YEAR N/A N/A FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER 04 29 2019 2019 - 003

- 00 06 28 2019 N/A N/A
9. OPERATING MODE
11. THIS REPORT IS SUBMITIED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR §: (Check all that apply}

D 20.2201 (bl D 20.22os(a)(s)(il D 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A)

D 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A)

N D 20.2201 (dl D 20.22os(a)(3)(ii)

D 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B)

D 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B)

D 20.22os(a)(1)

D 20.22os(a)(4l D 50.13(a)(2)(iiil D 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A)

D 20.22os(a)(2)(il D 50.3B(c)(1)(i)(A)

[gl 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A)

D 50.73(a)(2)(x)

10. POWER LEVEL D 20.2203(a)(2)(iil D 50.36(c)(1 )(ii)(A)

D 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A)

D 13.11 (a)(4l D 20.22os(a)(2)(iii)

D 5o:ss(c)(2)

D 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B)

D 13.11(a)(5l D 20.2203(a)(2)(iv)

D 5o.4s(a)(3)(ii)

D 50.73(a)(2)(v)(C)

D 13.11(a)(1) 082 D 20.2203(a)(2)(v)

D 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A)

D 50.73(a)(2)(v)(D)

D 13.11(a)(2)(il D 20.2203(a)(2)(vi)

D 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B)

D 50.73(a)(2)(vii)

D 13.11(a)(2)(iil

\\

D 50.73(a)(2)(i)(C)

D OTHER Specify in Abstract below or in *

E. METHOD OF DISCOVERY

This event was discovered by Reactor Operators when the reactor pressure, level and power oscillations were observed in the control room.

F. SAFETY SYSTEM RESPONSES:

All safety systems responded per design.

II. CAUSE OF EVENT

The cause of the event is being investigated and will be provided in the supplement.

III. ANALYSIS OF THE EVENT

The reactor scram and specified system activation is reportable under 1 O CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), as any event or condition that resulted in manual or automatic action of any of the specified systems listed in 1 O CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(B).

The non-optimal tuning resulted in EPR pressure control issues in the 80-90% power region during reactor startup that produced reactor pressure, level and power oscillations greater than those allowed without a backup pressure regulator available. A manual reactor scram was inserted per procedure.

All other plant systems performed per design. Plant parameters, other than the pressure, level and power oscillations, remained within normal values throughout the event. There was no loss of offsite power to the onsite emergency buses, the HPCI mode of feed and condensate system initiated as designed on the low reactor water level signal.

Based on the above discussion, it is concluded that the safety significance of this event is low and the event did not pose a threat to the health and safety of the public or plant personnel.

This event does affect the NRC Regulatory Oversight Process Indicator for unplanned scrams per 7000 hours0.081 days <br />1.944 hours <br />0.0116 weeks <br />0.00266 months <br /> of critical operation.

IV. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

A. ACTION TAKEN TO RETURN AFFECTED SYSTEMS TO PRE-EVENT NORMAL STATUS:

Tuning of the Turbine Control systems was completed.

B. ACTION TAKEN OR PLANNED TO PREVENT RECURRENCE:

To be provided in the supplement when the root cause evaluation is completed.

V. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

A. FAILED COMPONENTS:

Tuning of the EPR was not optimal. There were no individual component failures.

B. PREVIOUS LERs ON SIMILAR EVENTS:

NMP1 LER 2017-002, submitted May 18, 2017, was due to pressure oscillations at 4%

power. The cause of that event was a partial blockage within the MPR sensing line coupled with hysteresis found within the cylinder stroke of the Mechanical Hydraulic Control (MHC) Bypass Relay. The actions to prevent recurrence in 2017 included:

1. Implementation of a two-year preventive maintenance activity for routine flushing and filling of the pressure sensing bellows line and associated piping with contingencies to replace when required.
2. Revision of associated procedures to include steps to flush and backfill sensing lines.
3. Revised the Turbine Trip Test procedure.

These actions do not ensure the EPR is optimally tuned and would not have prevented this event.

C. THE ENERGY INDUSTRY IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (EIIS) COMPONENT FUNCTION IDENTIFIER AND SYSTEM NAME OF EACH COMPONENT OR SYSTEM REFERRED TO IN THIS LER:

COMPONENT Reactor Pressure Vessel Feedwater Level Cqntrol System High Pressure Coolant Injection System Reactor Protection System Turbine Control System Electronic Pressure Regulator IEEE 803 FUNCTION IDENTIFIER RPV N/A N/A N/A N/A RG IEEE 805 SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION AD JB BJ JC JJ JJ REV NO.

00 Page _4_ of _4_