ML13155A184

From kanterella
Revision as of 01:30, 17 July 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (412) of Grace Vanthillo Opposing Restart of San Onofre Unit 2 Until NRC Completes Comprehensive Investigation
ML13155A184
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 05/15/2013
From: VanThillo G
- No Known Affiliation
To: Apostolakis G, Macfarlane A M, Magwood W D, Ostendorff W C, Svinicki K L
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch, NRC/Chairman, NRC/OCM
References
NRC-2013-0070, 78FR22576 00412
Download: ML13155A184 (1)


Text

Joosten, Sandy From: Grace van Thillo [gracea@earthlink.net]

Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 11:23 AM To: CHAIRMAN Resource; CMRSVINICKI Resource; CMRAPOSTOLAKIS Resource;CMRMAGWOOD Resource; CMROSTENDORFF Resource Cc: Hall, Randy; Paige, Jason

Subject:

ASLB Order for San Onofre Lf C )May 15, 2013 r5? 0a 5-74 Honorable Nuclear Regulatory Chairperson and Commissioners, For the SAFETY of 8.4 + million southern Californians and the California ECONMare grateful for the ASLB's determination for a public hearing re: San Onofre nuclear plant's known replacement steam generator DESIGN FLAWS and FABRICATION CHANGES before any restart consideration.

Mitsubishi (MHI) disclosures about the defective RSGs that Congressional, GAO and state entities are scrutinizing; plus, the global nuclear industry's admission during your NRC meetings of San Onofre RSG's unprecedented, never-before-seen tube wear and integrity issues, ALL reveal the sane and safe course which the Nuclear Regulatory Commission MUST TAKE. This becomes evermore apparent as SCE testimony before the CPUC yesterday revealed more questions re: the licensee's "integrity testing"!http://www.californiaadmin.com/cpuc.shtml Please, follow the ASLB's determination.

NRC MUST REJECT Edison's EXPERIMENTAL restart plans of the defective San Onofre Unit 2 nuclear reactor.DO NOT approve a REDUCTION in safety standards!!

Your very investigations are continuing to uncover on-going plant issues, added to Unit 3's continued shut-down mode that all heighten stress to Edison International's management and SCE plant operations.

All of this in turn further compromises San Onofre nuclear plant's SAFETY.All of southern California

-we residents, business, the enviroprment; and the United States Marine Corps Camp Pendleton Base -Marines, their families and personnel CAN NOT be experimented with.Thank you and more concerned than ever!Grace van Thillo San Clemente Resident -<FT], C)SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= B. Benney (bjb)