ML13191A076

Comment (592) of 100 Individuals Opposing Restart of San Onofre, Unit 2, Until NRC Completes Comprehensive Investigation

ML13191A076
Person / Time
Site:	San Onofre
Issue date:	05/06/2013
From:	Crandall W - No Known Affiliation
To:	Bladey C K Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
78FR22576 00592
Download: ML13191A076 (1)

Text

May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Wendy Crandall1544 Elm Ave # ACosta Mesa, CA 92626-3802 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Ladeana Young111 Via JucarNewport Beach, CA 92663-4909 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the-deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Brett Thomsen2000 Dufour AveRedondo Beach, CA 90278-1310 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Claire Hirsch732 Maltman AveLos Angeles, CA 90026-3521 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Valerie Demartin1531 Via TulipanSan Clemente, CA 92673-3717 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Moira Nelson2415 Silverstrand AveHermosa Beach, CA 90254-2664 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators..

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

John Gaspar40620 158th St ELancaster, CA 93535-7042 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Raul Anorve4401 Berkshire AveLos Angeles, CA 90032-1315 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Dan Tangeman2146 Via TecaSan Clemente, CA 92673-5647 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.FOR THE LOVE OF OUR CHILDREN someone please have the foresight toNOT RESTART this or any other nuclear power plant.Amy de MacenaThank you for your attention to these concerns.

Amy Demacena1158 26th StSanta Monica, CA 90403-4698 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Michael Chean4601 Fulton Ave Apt 2Sherman Oaks, CA 91423-5153 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Jan Steward2219 Ben Lomond DrLos Angeles, CA 90027-2904 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

The public deserves a FULL review by the NRC of conditions at SanOnofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.

Giventhe troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raisedlevel of public concern, this should not be waived at the request ofthe plant owner.I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Nicole Siskind836 Wonder View DrCalabasas, CA 91302-2247 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Stephen Schneider 558 N Garfield AvePasadena, CA 91101 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Richard ReemanCA May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Gayle Dufour4725 San Sebastian DrWoodland Hills, CA 91364-4036 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally'inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Richard M Churchill 2458 Calle Aquamarina San Clemente, CA 92673-3904 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Celeste Rothstein 5419 Autry AveLakewood, CA 90712-2015 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Stephen Blake8122 Munster DrHuntington Beach, CA 92646-5025 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Paula Plotnick106 1/2 N Kings RdLos Angeles, CA 90048-2618 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

W Mc Gill2622 Laurel AveManhattan Beach, CA 90266-2312 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Mike Tasker9921 Bond CirHuntington Beach, CA 92646-3601 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature:"

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Laura Gray1430 S Orange DrLos Angeles, CA 90019-4122 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes~that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Janet Hicks1156 W 37th StSan Pedro, CA 90731-6461 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Jessica Abrams616 1/4 N Plymouth BlvdLos Angeles, CA 90004-1421 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S.'Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Roberta Brown942 10th St Apt 3Santa Monica, CA 90403-2954 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Michele Fielding5422 Village GrnLos Angeles, CA 90016-5107 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Carmen Tolivar14655 Weddington StSherman Oaks, CA 91411-4041 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Valesca Harp1131 Alta Loma Rd Apt 532West Hollywood, CA 90069-2495 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Tom Earnist734 W 22nd StSan Pedro, CA 90731-5826 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Zack Frank836 Melrose Hill StLos Angeles, CA 90029-3714 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Mario Salgado1392 N Schooner LnAnaheim, CA 92801-1779 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to.follow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Nina Macdonald 10 Handel CtIrvine, CA 92617-4079 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Kristina Fukuda-Schmid 11250 Garfield AveCulver City, CA 90230-4810 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Eric Von Brink10e W 2nd StLos Angeles, CA 90012-1586 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Robert Sullivan4017 Ocean DrManhattan Beach, CA 90266-3162 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Eva Munoz734 Wildrose AveMonrovia, CA 91016-3032 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Betty Brown4512 Greenbush AveSherman Oaks, CA 91423-3112 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Jessica Peet611 S Cloverdale AveLos Angeles, CA 90036-4164 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Margaret Meinschein 4213 Le Bourget AveCulver City, CA 90232-3412 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Jerry Brown10337 Laramie AveChatsworth, CA 91311-2556 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

As a physician, I am concerned that the health of the public should notbe placed at serious risk by any possibility of a release ofradioactivity.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

William Perkins1347 Avenida De CortezPacific Palisades, CA 90272-2124 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Ron Calvisi10646 Chiquita StToluca Lake, CA 91602-3215 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Brent Riggs1157 E Hyde Park BlvdInglewood, CA 90302-1846 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Patrick Wen35446 Seaview DrCapistrano Beach, CA 92624-1815 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Christoph Ruegg3809 Blue Canyon DrStudio City, CA 91604-3804 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Carlos S Luna1349 Yale St Apt 4Santa Monica, CA 90404-2443 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Robert Frcek961 Amherst AveLos Angeles, CA 90049-5801 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 2055570001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Dan SquiresLong Beach, CA 90802-3737 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Jeff Doucette6255 Whitsett AveNorth Hollywood, CA 91606-3129 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Koila Ahumada5761 Fair Ave Apt 4North Hollywood, CA 91601-1990 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Mynka Draper6041 Eucalyptus LnLos Angeles, CA 90042-1243 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Ananda Lee323 Orizaba Ave Apt 3Long Beach, CA 90814-0810 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Alan Scop13697 Badger AveSylmar, CA 91342-2510 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Analee Scott34145 Pacific Coast HwyDana Point, CA 92629-2808 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Debbie Bolsky802 3rd St Apt DSanta Monica, CA 90403-1162 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Devon Gupta1136 N Columbus Ave Apt 304Glendale, CA 91202-2300 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course. -We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Joan Meijer311 Main St Ste EEl Segundo, CA 90245-3861 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Please don't sell us out!Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Christine Thill3226 Faust AveLong Beach, CA 90808-3807 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Gerald Shaia8103 San Fernando RdSun Valley, CA 91352-4005 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Jane Brockman4260 La Salle AveCulver City, CA 90232-3212 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Gary Weinstein 5121 Klump Ave Apt 203North Hollywood, CA 91601-4902 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Diane Berliner2160 Laurel Canyon BlvdLos Angeles, CA 90046-2004 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Maureen Toth11206 Laurie DrStudio City, CA 91604-3877 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Amy TharpCA May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Kieran Healy31550 Lobo Canyon RdAgoura, CA 91301-3417 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Ilka Erren Pardinas2658 Griffith Park BlvdLos Angeles, CA 90039-2520 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Heather Adams3944 Verdugo View DrLos Angeles, CA 90065-3504 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Brianna Salit113 E Balboa BlvdNewport Beach, CA 92661-1117 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.I don't see the logic of weakened license requirements when we have thevery recent example of the continuing Fukushima disaster.

We don'teven know the full impact of Fukushima yet. It's still happening.

San Onofre is on top of a recently discovered geologic fault and issurrounded by many more. In my opinion the plant should bedecommissioned and some alternative energy source like wind, solar,wave action, heat pump....

something much safer built on that land.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Nancy Balstad329 Cabrillo St Apt CCosta Mesa, CA 92627-3124 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Barbara Scheinman 22862 OrenseMission Viejo, CA 92691-1723 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Ed Taylor19752 Potomac LnHuntington Beach, CA 92646-3518 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Lisa Rubin6700 Warner Ave Apt 33gHuntington Beach, CA 92647-5354 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Blue Mcright1337 Palms BlvdVenice, CA 90291-2907 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Sol Fingold269 S Clark DrBeverly Hills, CA 90211-2608 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Chet Spalsky133 Spring VlyIrvine, CA 92602-0919 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track-restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Susan Davis Mantee23908 De Ville Way Apt AMalibu, CA 90265-4850 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Marjon Shabanpour 22351 TorinoLaguna Hills, CA 92653-1964 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Murray Goldsmith 11786 Coorsgold LnNorthridge, CA 91326-4132 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you.for your attention to these concerns.

Maricela Padilla1037 E 24th StLos Angeles, CA 90011-1616 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Deborah Kashinsky 210 Muerdago RdTopanga, CA 90290-3545 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Eileen Rosenfeld 5455 Sylmar Ave Apt 1204Sherman Oaks, CA 91401-5148 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Christian Manfredi10845 Camarillo St Apt 101North Hollywood, CA 91602-1361 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

rollin blanton May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

lanny cordola7890 E Spring St Unit 41Long Beach, CA 90815-1639 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Sean Reagan14739 Wheatstone AveNorwalk, CA 90650-6042 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Lyndsey Smith2205 Via GavilanSan Clemente, CA 92673-5643 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Cameron Heravi25162 Mustang DrLaguna Hills, CA 92653-5745 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Katherine Huff23831 Ionian BayDana Point, CA 92629-4409 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.PLEASE, quit, equivacating,

studying, and delaying, SHUTTING down, thisdangerous nuclear power source ..... I'm finished evaluating thenecessity of this plant. The perponderous mass of evidence, clearlypoints to the retiring of this plant. PleaseThank you for your attention to these concerns.

William BrownPO Box 2307Manhattan Beach, CA 90267-2307 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

John Gilles2278 Luana LnMontrose, CA 91020-1211 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Diana Barbee965 Stunt RdCalabasas, CA 91302-2334 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Mike Boulet2530 Plaza Del AmoTorrance, CA 90503-7366 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

valerie longo550 E California BlvdPasadena, CA 91106-3840 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Angelique Higgins2385 Roscomare Rd Unit F4Los Angeles, CA 90077-1822 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Thomas BrownPO Box 10099Santa Ana, CA 92711-0099 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Jonathan Skurnik3217 1/2 Huron StLos Angeles, CA 90065-1509 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Herman David268 S Canon DrBeverly Hills, CA 90212-4007 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Crissi Avila2033 N Beachwood DrLos Angeles, CA 90068-3454 May 6, 2013Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision.

We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Dennis Trembly880 W Ist St Apt 301Los Angeles, CA 90012-2417