|
---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML24029A2902024-01-29029 January 2024 Comment (3) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24025A1542024-01-25025 January 2024 Comment (2) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24025A1402024-01-24024 January 2024 Comment (1) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML22228A1642022-08-15015 August 2022 Comment (5) of Cindy Marie Absey, Neil Havlik & Kim Murry on Behalf of League of Women Voters of San Luis Obispo County, Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activ ML22203A0462022-07-21021 July 2022 Comment (3) of Californians for Green Nuclear Power, Inc., on Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report ML22203A0452022-07-21021 July 2022 Comment (2) of Jane Swanson on Behalf of San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace on Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report ML22202A4242022-07-19019 July 2022 Comment (1) of Anonymous on Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report ML15275A2152015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (40) of Bruce Campbell on Helium Finding Adds New Wrinkle to Newport-Inglewood Fault ML15275A2132015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (38) of Mary Ivora on Environmental Benefits of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant ML15275A2292015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (31) Regarding Civilian Nuclear Power ML15275A2282015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (30) of Unknown Individual Opposing Diablo Canyon Units 1 and 2 ML15275A2302015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (32) of Joe Ivora Supporting the Relicensing of Diablo Canyon ML15275A2342015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (36) of Elizabeth Brousse on Behalf of Mothers for Peace on the License Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant ML15275A2312015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (33) of Debby Nicklas, on Behalf of French Hospital Medical Center, Supporting the License Renewal and Ongoing Operations of PG&E ML15282A3002015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (45) of Allen Myers Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant License Renewal ML15289A3742015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (84) of Gene Nelson of Californians for Green Nuclear Power Supporting Renewal of the License Application for Diablo Canyon Power Plant ML15292A5462015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (103) of Becky Ota and Craig Shuman, on Behalf of California Department of Fish and Wildlife, on Notice of Intent to Reinitiate the Environmental Scoping Process for the Review of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant License Renewal ML15287A4362015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (71) of Gene Nelson Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact ML15282A2982015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (43) of Minea Herwitz Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant License Renewal ML15258A3472015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (29) of Craig Shuman on Behalf of the State of CA - Natural Resources Agency, Regarding Notice of Intent to Reinitiate the Environmental Scoping Process for the Review of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 ML15282A3042015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (49) of David Traub Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant License Renewal ML15282A3032015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (48) of Anonymous Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant License Renewal ML15292A5452015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (102) of Bruce Campbell on Deis in Regards to Diablo Canyon Facility License Extension ML15292A2362015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (92) of Oliver Mellan on Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant License ML15292A2352015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (91) of Alexander Cannara on Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A2372015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (93) of Bob Greene on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A2382015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (88) of Meagan Wilson on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A2392015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (89) of Mike Kirkwood on Behalf of Economic Alliance of Northern Santa Barbara County on Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant License ML15292A2402015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (90) of Oliver Mellan on Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant License ML15292A3392015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (94) of Sarah Risley, Heather Tarango, Shilo Terek, Megan Wilson, and Kristin Zaitz Supporting Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A3402015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (95) of Madeline Cimone on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A3412015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (96) of Daryl Gale Opposing Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A3892015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (97) of Anthony Allen Bisset Opposing on the Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 License; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A3902015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (98) of Joseph Ivora on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal ML15258A3452015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (28) of Ann Mcpherson, on Behalf of Us EPA, on Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Operating License Renewal for Diablo Canyon Power Plant Units 1 and 2, San Luis Obispo County, California ML15292A3912015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (99) of Nina Beety, on Behalf of Smart Meter Harm, Opposing Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A3922015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (100) of Margaret Smith on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A5442015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (101) of Antoinette Stein on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15289A4052015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (82) of Anthony Armini on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal ML15289A4032015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (81) of William P Gloege on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal ML15289A3132015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (83) of Gene Nelson Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15289A3142015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (85) of Lmh Anonymous Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15289A3152015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (86) from Anonymous Opposing Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15289A3162015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (87) of Steve Mcgrath Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15289A3982015-08-30030 August 2015 Comment (76) William P. Gloege of Supporting Re-Licensing of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant ML15289A4022015-08-30030 August 2015 Comment (80) of Jerry Brown on Behalf of World Business Academy on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal ML15289A4012015-08-30030 August 2015 Comment (79) of Kirk Gothier on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal ML15289A4002015-08-30030 August 2015 Comment (78) of Gene Nelson on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal ML15289A3992015-08-30030 August 2015 Comment (77) of Gene Nelson on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal ML15289A3972015-08-30030 August 2015 Comment (75) of Jane Swanson on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal 2024-01-29
[Table view] |
Text
r41-.9/1/2015" N RC- 2009- 0552- DRAFT- 0092.html PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 9/1/15 5:13 PMReceived:
August 31, 2015Status: PendingPost Tracking No. ljz-8kvb-crkg Comments Due: August 31, 2015Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2009-0552 Notice of Receipt and Availability of Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear PowerPlant LicenseComment On: NRC-2009-0552-0026 Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental ImpactStatement C-%I~&Document:
NRC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0092 Comment on FR Doc # 2015-15921
~7]Submitter Information Name: Joseph IvoraAddress:4605 Hummel Dr.Orcutt, CA, 93455Emaih: j osmar46@aol, corn@2/-A 3Z5-/11<,,©cr-General CommentI am a retired Civil Engineer, a passionate Environmentalist, and retired from Diablo CanyonPower Plant. I want Diablo Canyon to be relicensed because:1) it runs so clean, it emits no CO no nitric oxide, no ozone or other gas-related pollutons;
- 2) it does not produce any ash to pollute the land or water. All the high-level waste is collected, and safely controlled.
The so-called waste is about 95% unspent fuel that could be reprocessed andreused. This is not a technical
- problem, only a political problem.
The waste has no effect on theenvironment since it is contained in steel and concrete containers.
Waste has a very small footprint at Diablo Canyon. I would invite you to take a public tour and see for yourselves.
Diablo Canyon does not emit any radiation to the general public. No one has died from theradiation from a commercial nuclear power plant anywhere in the world, but millions die from thecombustion of coal, oil and natural gas to produce electricity at fossil fuel plants.Diablo Canyon produces about 10% of California's low-cost, carbon-free, very reliable electricity for nearly 3 million Californians without the approximately 6 1/2 million tons of greenhouse gasesthat would be emitted annually by a fossil fuel plant.fl le:lllC :/U sers/CAG/Dow nlaoads/NR C -2009- 0552 D RAFT- 0092.html1/
1/2
N RC-2009-0552-D RAFT-0092.html Diablo Canyon runs 24/7 to meet the energy needs of California no matter if we are in a droughtseason, a rainy season, or if it is night, or if there is no wind, and at the same time meet the stateand federal pollution EPA requirements.
Fossil fuel plants cannot meet the future EPA pollution requirements with the current technology.
Nuclear power provides 63% of the clean electricity inthe United States.Solar and wind have a very limited capacity to meet the energy needs of the future and therefore, must include Diablo Canyon which has a very high capacity factor of above 90%. California has aphilosophy of more renewables and energy efficiency.
All those things are great, but we know thatbig, base load power plants are what provide stability for the system. Renewables are intermittent and unreliable, and without having a real strong backbone of nuclear or fossil fuel, the reliability ofthe grid is jeopardized.
- However, fossil fuel is dirty. Nuclear is the only clean option. Nuclearpower has to be a part of any future clean energy mix, so our children and their children will haveabundant, reliable and clean energy.Diablo Canyon also provides clean water using desalination for the local community.
Thank you.file:lllC:/UserslCAGIDownloadslNRC-2009-O552-DRAFT-0O92.html2/
212 r41-.9/1/2015" N RC- 2009- 0552- DRAFT- 0092.html PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 9/1/15 5:13 PMReceived:
August 31, 2015Status: PendingPost Tracking No. ljz-8kvb-crkg Comments Due: August 31, 2015Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2009-0552 Notice of Receipt and Availability of Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear PowerPlant LicenseComment On: NRC-2009-0552-0026 Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental ImpactStatement C-%I~&Document:
NRC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0092 Comment on FR Doc # 2015-15921
~7]Submitter Information Name: Joseph IvoraAddress:4605 Hummel Dr.Orcutt, CA, 93455Emaih: j osmar46@aol, corn@2/-A 3Z5-/11<,,©cr-General CommentI am a retired Civil Engineer, a passionate Environmentalist, and retired from Diablo CanyonPower Plant. I want Diablo Canyon to be relicensed because:1) it runs so clean, it emits no CO no nitric oxide, no ozone or other gas-related pollutons;
- 2) it does not produce any ash to pollute the land or water. All the high-level waste is collected, and safely controlled.
The so-called waste is about 95% unspent fuel that could be reprocessed andreused. This is not a technical
- problem, only a political problem.
The waste has no effect on theenvironment since it is contained in steel and concrete containers.
Waste has a very small footprint at Diablo Canyon. I would invite you to take a public tour and see for yourselves.
Diablo Canyon does not emit any radiation to the general public. No one has died from theradiation from a commercial nuclear power plant anywhere in the world, but millions die from thecombustion of coal, oil and natural gas to produce electricity at fossil fuel plants.Diablo Canyon produces about 10% of California's low-cost, carbon-free, very reliable electricity for nearly 3 million Californians without the approximately 6 1/2 million tons of greenhouse gasesthat would be emitted annually by a fossil fuel plant.fl le:lllC :/U sers/CAG/Dow nlaoads/NR C -2009- 0552 D RAFT- 0092.html1/
1/2
N RC-2009-0552-D RAFT-0092.html Diablo Canyon runs 24/7 to meet the energy needs of California no matter if we are in a droughtseason, a rainy season, or if it is night, or if there is no wind, and at the same time meet the stateand federal pollution EPA requirements.
Fossil fuel plants cannot meet the future EPA pollution requirements with the current technology.
Nuclear power provides 63% of the clean electricity inthe United States.Solar and wind have a very limited capacity to meet the energy needs of the future and therefore, must include Diablo Canyon which has a very high capacity factor of above 90%. California has aphilosophy of more renewables and energy efficiency.
All those things are great, but we know thatbig, base load power plants are what provide stability for the system. Renewables are intermittent and unreliable, and without having a real strong backbone of nuclear or fossil fuel, the reliability ofthe grid is jeopardized.
- However, fossil fuel is dirty. Nuclear is the only clean option. Nuclearpower has to be a part of any future clean energy mix, so our children and their children will haveabundant, reliable and clean energy.Diablo Canyon also provides clean water using desalination for the local community.
Thank you.file:lllC:/UserslCAGIDownloadslNRC-2009-O552-DRAFT-0O92.html2/
212