ML15289A315

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (86) from Anonymous Opposing Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
ML15289A315
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 08/31/2015
From:
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
80FR37664 00086, NRC-2009-0552
Download: ML15289A315 (2)


Text

9/12r~15N R C- 2009- 0552- DRAFT- 0080.html As of: 9/1/15 5:08 PM V"U PUBLIC SUBMISSION Status: PendingPost Tracking No. ljz-8kv5-q02m Comments Due: August 31, 2015 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2009-0552 Notice of Receipt and Availability of Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant License Comment On: NRC-2009-0552-0026 Diablo Canyon Power'Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environment ct Statement Document:

NRC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0080 ( -")Comment on FRDoc #2015-15921 , .. 7 " Submitter Information Name: Anonymous Anonymous F rn---4 rn General Comment ID: NRC-2009-0552-0026 I oppose the relicensing of these reactors at Diablo Canyon.The existence of serious earthquakes in California is sufficient enough that these reactors should never have opened. They certainly shouldn't be relicensed..

There is not only a direct risk to the nuclear power station, but road infrastructure failure can keep backup and emergency workers from arriving.Even if the reactor survives there may not be workers.The SAFER program has been shown by the NRC to be a ridiculous "comedy" of errors and the location is not near Diablo. They ultimately want to depend upon the Military-National Guard, who will have other things to do. Katrina gives a heads up of what can be expected from the other branches of the Federal Government.

There is also a major fire risk.The piping is apparently not up to earthquake standards.

An accident at Diablo will contaminate much of the US and Canada and kill many. If Fukushima doesn't finish off the Pacific, it will.file:lllC

lUserslCAGIDownloadslN RC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0080.html1/

1/2 N RC-2009-0552-D RAFT-0080.html Do you know that if you kill ocean plankton there won't be oxygen to breathe?If you wish to downplay the risk through collusion with PG&E you can't change reality.Much of America's food comes from California.

The FDA "standards" are the highest in the world and will result in high cancer rates from food alone. Where will you get clean food? From Fukushima?

Why are you hiding comments?

There is great opposition to this and almost no new comments posted.That you are even considering relicensing Diablo proves that you are stark raving mad and/or diabolic-evil with intent to murder. What else to expect from an agency that proposes that the"safe" limit of radiation be raised to be 400 times that allowed by the US EPA, and 100 times the current NRC "limit", thus guaranteeing cancer for everyone.Chickens will come home to roost soon. A US nuclear accident is imminent and it's not upping the dose you consider safe by 100 fold, as you plan, which will change reality. While I predict that you won't get by with these cons much longer, if you do you will still have to be accountable when you die. So, it's best to repent now, come clean, and stop this relicensing and all of the other financial and health crimes. There's no forgiveness without repentance.

You appear hell-bent to roast and toast America with radiation.

Do you want to roast and toast in hell when you die, as well?file:IllC

/U sers/CAG/D ow nl ods/N RC-2009- 0552- DRAFT- 0080.htm[l/

2/2 9/12r~15N R C- 2009- 0552- DRAFT- 0080.html As of: 9/1/15 5:08 PM V"U PUBLIC SUBMISSION Status: PendingPost Tracking No. ljz-8kv5-q02m Comments Due: August 31, 2015 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2009-0552 Notice of Receipt and Availability of Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant License Comment On: NRC-2009-0552-0026 Diablo Canyon Power'Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environment ct Statement Document:

NRC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0080 ( -")Comment on FRDoc #2015-15921 , .. 7 " Submitter Information Name: Anonymous Anonymous F rn---4 rn General Comment ID: NRC-2009-0552-0026 I oppose the relicensing of these reactors at Diablo Canyon.The existence of serious earthquakes in California is sufficient enough that these reactors should never have opened. They certainly shouldn't be relicensed..

There is not only a direct risk to the nuclear power station, but road infrastructure failure can keep backup and emergency workers from arriving.Even if the reactor survives there may not be workers.The SAFER program has been shown by the NRC to be a ridiculous "comedy" of errors and the location is not near Diablo. They ultimately want to depend upon the Military-National Guard, who will have other things to do. Katrina gives a heads up of what can be expected from the other branches of the Federal Government.

There is also a major fire risk.The piping is apparently not up to earthquake standards.

An accident at Diablo will contaminate much of the US and Canada and kill many. If Fukushima doesn't finish off the Pacific, it will.file:lllC

lUserslCAGIDownloadslN RC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0080.html1/

1/2 N RC-2009-0552-D RAFT-0080.html Do you know that if you kill ocean plankton there won't be oxygen to breathe?If you wish to downplay the risk through collusion with PG&E you can't change reality.Much of America's food comes from California.

The FDA "standards" are the highest in the world and will result in high cancer rates from food alone. Where will you get clean food? From Fukushima?

Why are you hiding comments?

There is great opposition to this and almost no new comments posted.That you are even considering relicensing Diablo proves that you are stark raving mad and/or diabolic-evil with intent to murder. What else to expect from an agency that proposes that the"safe" limit of radiation be raised to be 400 times that allowed by the US EPA, and 100 times the current NRC "limit", thus guaranteeing cancer for everyone.Chickens will come home to roost soon. A US nuclear accident is imminent and it's not upping the dose you consider safe by 100 fold, as you plan, which will change reality. While I predict that you won't get by with these cons much longer, if you do you will still have to be accountable when you die. So, it's best to repent now, come clean, and stop this relicensing and all of the other financial and health crimes. There's no forgiveness without repentance.

You appear hell-bent to roast and toast America with radiation.

Do you want to roast and toast in hell when you die, as well?file:IllC

/U sers/CAG/D ow nl ods/N RC-2009- 0552- DRAFT- 0080.htm[l/

2/2