|
---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML20161A0122020-06-0808 June 2020 Comment (48) of Martin Kral on Holtec International HI-STORE Consolidated Interim Storage Facility Project ML20115E5482020-04-24024 April 2020 Comment (23) of Pam and Greg Nelson on Holtec International HI-STORE Consolidated Interim Storage Facility Project ML18155A3262018-06-0404 June 2018 Comment (49) of Eva M. O'Keefe on Very Low-Level Radioactive Waste Scoping Study ML18158A1872018-06-0101 June 2018 Comment (51) of Gayle Smith Concerning Nuclear Waste in San Onofre Research and Action Is Needed to Protect the Public ML18158A1862018-05-29029 May 2018 Comment (50) of Joanna Mathews Concerning San Onofre Nuclear Station to Find a Permanent Solution for the Nuclear Waste ML18155A3252018-05-29029 May 2018 Comment (48) of Quentin De Bruyn Opposing to San Onofre Waste Situation ML18066A5612018-03-0707 March 2018 Comment (161) of Matt Collins Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18066A5552018-03-0707 March 2018 Comment (157) of Kathleen Morris Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18066A5582018-03-0707 March 2018 Comment (159) of Anonymous on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18066A5292018-01-22022 January 2018 Comment (140) of Patricia Martz Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18066A5262018-01-22022 January 2018 Comment (139) of Abell Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18066A5252018-01-22022 January 2018 Comment (138) of Michelle Schumacher Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18066A5532018-01-22022 January 2018 Comment (155) of Jan Boudart on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18066A5302018-01-16016 January 2018 Comment (141) of Erin Koch on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18066A5322018-01-10010 January 2018 Comment 142 of Dave Rice on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18066A5372018-01-0808 January 2018 Comment (146) of Carey Strombotne on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18066A5392018-01-0404 January 2018 Comment 147 of Phoebe Sorgen on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18066A5512018-01-0303 January 2018 Comment (153) of Alexander Bay Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18066A5562018-01-0303 January 2018 Comment (158) of Lee Mclendon Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18066A5492018-01-0303 January 2018 Comment (152) of Shari Horne Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18066A5242018-01-0303 January 2018 Comment (137) of Joseph Gildner Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18033A5962018-01-0202 January 2018 Comment (60) of Matthew Stein Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18032A1932018-01-0202 January 2018 Comment (44) of Mha Atma S. Khalsa Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18033A5952018-01-0202 January 2018 Comment (59) of Chelsea Anonymous Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18032A1952018-01-0202 January 2018 Comment (45) of T. Strohmeier on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18033A5932018-01-0202 January 2018 Comment (57) of Patrick Bosold Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18033A5702018-01-0202 January 2018 Comment (56) of Katya Gaynor on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18033A5692018-01-0202 January 2018 Comment (55) of Robert Hensley on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18033A5672018-01-0202 January 2018 Comment (54) of Angela Sarich Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18032A1972018-01-0202 January 2018 Comment (46) of Cheryl Harding Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18033A5632018-01-0202 January 2018 Comment (52) of Viraja Prema on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18033A5622018-01-0202 January 2018 Comment (51) of Larisa Stow-Norman Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18033A4982018-01-0202 January 2018 Comment (66) of Nancy Alexander Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18033A4962018-01-0202 January 2018 Comment (65) of Lorna Farnun Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18032A2002018-01-0202 January 2018 Comment (49) of Starr Cornwall Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18032A1992018-01-0202 January 2018 Comment (48) of Daryl Gale on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18037A6822018-01-0202 January 2018 Comment (94) of Jennifer Quest on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18032A1922018-01-0202 January 2018 Comment (43) of Frances Howard Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18037A6992018-01-0202 January 2018 Comment (108) from Anonymous Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG ML18037A6972018-01-0202 January 2018 Comment (107) of Diana Dehm on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18037A6922018-01-0202 January 2018 Comment (104) of Ari Marsh on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18037A6912018-01-0202 January 2018 Comment (103) Christina Koppisch Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG ML18037A6902018-01-0202 January 2018 Comment (102) of Helen Hanna on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18037A6892018-01-0202 January 2018 Comment (100) of Cindy Koch Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18037A6882018-01-0202 January 2018 Comment (101) Angela Ravenwood Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG ML18037A6872018-01-0202 January 2018 Comment (99) of Melissa Brizzie Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18036A1912018-01-0202 January 2018 Comment (72) of J. C. Chernicky Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18037A6812018-01-0202 January 2018 Comment (93) of Ricardo Toro Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18037A6802018-01-0202 January 2018 Comment (92) of Stan Weber Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities ML18036A2082018-01-0202 January 2018 Comment (89) of B. Grace on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities 2020-06-08
[Table view] |
Text
A6 FRIDAY, DECEMBER 5,2014LAGUNA BEACH COASTLINE PILOTA6 FRIDAY: DECEMBER 5, 2014 LAGUNA BEACH COASTLINE PILOTMailbagFORUMM/hrro h to ~l. -"*0%73fThere is a mysteriouscampaign going on againstourllocal newspapers. Theykeep~disappearing.WE\ were surprised anddisappointed to see that lo-cal ne spapers are no long-er avatihble in the space be-tween A4astasia and the fleamarket 61 Ocean Avenue. Afew ye ago, local news-papers w e removed fromthe w y between thepost office d the Lumber-yard mall. en local news-papers wer banned fromthe entrance o Wells FargoBank.All were con enient placesto pick up copi s, as well aspresenting an o ortunity tocheck out nearb business-es.We don't know these re-movals were don at thewish of the busin sses, orsome out-of-town ropertymanagers or neatne zeal-ots. Sure, things were littleuntidy at times, but th n lifecan be untidy as well.Anne and Dickc nkLaguna B chTell regulatorygroup we don'twant waste dumpLaguna Beach is withinthe 20-square-mile area sub-ject to permanent relocationWe don't know ifthese removalswere done at thewish of thebusinesses, orsome out-of-townproperty managersor neatnesszealots.in the event of a radiation ac-cident at the San Onofre Nu-clear Generating Station,which has been closed be-cause of safety concerns.The plant is situated in arecognized tsunami, earth-quake and firestorm zoneand is vulnerable to climatechange and terrorist attack.The 1,631 tons of spent fuelnow stored on the site will re-main highly radioactive fortens of thousands of genera-tions, according to a ,reportcommissioned by theFriends of the Earth organi-zation in 2013.We were promised whenthe plant was constructedthat the spent fuel rodswould be removed from thesite, but the current plan per-mits them to be stored on*the site for 60 years or indefi-nitely until a federal reposi-tory for them has been creat-ed, according to the report.At the same time, theroads and railroad spurs andthe equipment necessary forthe transfer of the fuel, rodsto a safe repository arescheduled to be removed by2032, and there is no fundingfor storage after 2048, ac-cording to a Southern Cali-fornia Edison Post-Shut-down Decommissioning Ac-tivities report.A better idea would be tomove the spent fuel rods to asecure interim location, per-haps a military base or som,eother sparsely populatedarea, before the decomrms-sionng of the plant is con-sidered complete and to-hold SCE responsible for:;their safety 'and security as.long as they remain at San* Onofre.""We'liave until Dec. 22 to letthe Nuclear RegulatoryCommission know that wedon't want a radioactivewaste dump in our backyard.The address is U.S. NuclearRegulatory Commission,Attn: Cindy Bladey, Office ofAdministration, NRC, MailStop: 3WFN-06-A44M,Washington, D.C. 20555-0001.-73--7191::--A 6 / e, (/' k""Barbara MetzgerLaguna BeachSUNSI Review CompleteTemplate = ADM -013E-RIDS= ADM-03Add=
A6 FRIDAY, DECEMBER 5,2014LAGUNA BEACH COASTLINE PILOTA6 FRIDAY: DECEMBER 5, 2014 LAGUNA BEACH COASTLINE PILOTMailbagFORUMM/hrro h to ~l. -"*0%73fThere is a mysteriouscampaign going on againstourllocal newspapers. Theykeep~disappearing.WE\ were surprised anddisappointed to see that lo-cal ne spapers are no long-er avatihble in the space be-tween A4astasia and the fleamarket 61 Ocean Avenue. Afew ye ago, local news-papers w e removed fromthe w y between thepost office d the Lumber-yard mall. en local news-papers wer banned fromthe entrance o Wells FargoBank.All were con enient placesto pick up copi s, as well aspresenting an o ortunity tocheck out nearb business-es.We don't know these re-movals were don at thewish of the busin sses, orsome out-of-town ropertymanagers or neatne zeal-ots. Sure, things were littleuntidy at times, but th n lifecan be untidy as well.Anne and Dickc nkLaguna B chTell regulatorygroup we don'twant waste dumpLaguna Beach is withinthe 20-square-mile area sub-ject to permanent relocationWe don't know ifthese removalswere done at thewish of thebusinesses, orsome out-of-townproperty managersor neatnesszealots.in the event of a radiation ac-cident at the San Onofre Nu-clear Generating Station,which has been closed be-cause of safety concerns.The plant is situated in arecognized tsunami, earth-quake and firestorm zoneand is vulnerable to climatechange and terrorist attack.The 1,631 tons of spent fuelnow stored on the site will re-main highly radioactive fortens of thousands of genera-tions, according to a ,reportcommissioned by theFriends of the Earth organi-zation in 2013.We were promised whenthe plant was constructedthat the spent fuel rodswould be removed from thesite, but the current plan per-mits them to be stored on*the site for 60 years or indefi-nitely until a federal reposi-tory for them has been creat-ed, according to the report.At the same time, theroads and railroad spurs andthe equipment necessary forthe transfer of the fuel, rodsto a safe repository arescheduled to be removed by2032, and there is no fundingfor storage after 2048, ac-cording to a Southern Cali-fornia Edison Post-Shut-down Decommissioning Ac-tivities report.A better idea would be tomove the spent fuel rods to asecure interim location, per-haps a military base or som,eother sparsely populatedarea, before the decomrms-sionng of the plant is con-sidered complete and to-hold SCE responsible for:;their safety 'and security as.long as they remain at San* Onofre.""We'liave until Dec. 22 to letthe Nuclear RegulatoryCommission know that wedon't want a radioactivewaste dump in our backyard.The address is U.S. NuclearRegulatory Commission,Attn: Cindy Bladey, Office ofAdministration, NRC, MailStop: 3WFN-06-A44M,Washington, D.C. 20555-0001.-73--7191::--A 6 / e, (/' k""Barbara MetzgerLaguna BeachSUNSI Review CompleteTemplate = ADM -013E-RIDS= ADM-03Add=