05000440/FIN-2008003-06
From kanterella
Revision as of 10:35, 30 May 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Finding | |
|---|---|
| Title | Licensee-Identified Violation |
| Description | Perry Station TS 5.7.1 states in part, that each HRA shall be barricaded and conspicuously posted as an HRA and entrance thereto shall be controlled by issuance of an RWP. The TS further requires that entry into such areas be made after dose rate levels in the area have been established and personnel are aware of them. Contrary to the above, on May 1, 2007, on two occasions while performing a fire watch, a security officer entered a controlled, posted, and barricaded HRA in the turbine building lube oil room without being on a RWP which permitted access into the area. Additionally, the officer had not received a briefing from the radiation protection staff such that the officer was aware of the radiological conditions prior to entering the area. Specifically, when the officer opened the north door to the area, the officer observed a posted HRA boundary. The officer immediately shut the door and proceeded to the south door of the area and observed a similar posted HRA boundary. Although the officer was not on an RWP which allowed access into the area, the officer decided to finish the fire watch and proceeded across the boundary. The officer also entered the same area during a second fire watch tour later that day. Based on an OI investigation (OI Case No. 3-2007-021), the NRC staff concluded that the officers second entry into the HRA was a willful violation. However, because the violation had no actual radiological significance and minimal potential significance, the violation involved the acts of a low-level individual resulting from an isolated action without management involvement, there was no economic or other advantage gained as a result of the violation, and adequate remedial action was taken, the violation was categorized at Severity Level IV. Because the violation is of very low safety significance, it meets the additional criteria in Section VI.A.1 of the NRC Enforcement Policy, and it has been entered into the corrective action system (CR 19784), it is being treated, after consultation with the Director, Office of Enforcement, as an NCV |
| Site: | Perry  |
|---|---|
| Report | IR 05000440/2008003 Section 4OA7 |
| Date counted | Jun 30, 2008 (2008Q2) |
| Type: | TEV: Severity level IV |
| cornerstone | Mitigating Systems |
| Identified by: | Licensee-identified |
| Inspection Procedure: | |
| Inspectors (proximate) | M Wilk M Phalen G Wright M Franke R Leidy T Taylor J Cameron R Murray |
| INPO aspect | |
| ' | |
Finding - Perry - IR 05000440/2008003 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finding List (Perry) @ 2008Q2
Self-Identified List (Perry)
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||