ML17214A693
| ML17214A693 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 10/31/1983 |
| From: | VANDERBEEK R EG&G, INC. |
| To: | NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17214A692 | List: |
| References | |
| CON-FIN-A-6600, RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737 EGG-EA-6432-DRF, EGG-EA-6432-DRFT, GL-82-16, NUDOCS 8402130457 | |
| Download: ML17214A693 (22) | |
Text
4EGG-EA-6432OCTOBER1983CONFORMANCETONRRGENERICLETTER82-16ST.LUCIEPLANTUNITNOS1AND2R.VanderBeekIdahoNationalEngineeringLaboratoryOperatedbytheU.S.DepartmentofEnergyljfzj.ragaeahsAnmvI'!',Iv!~'rdV-addaaaaada~ov~'-'""h"=oaves';.,g-"-.L..rr'~ottv'.W.Ca4~~4hThisisaninformalreportintendedforuseasapreliminaryorworkingdocument0402130407840($0~;.PDR,ADOCK05000335,',',,',PPDR'reparedrortheU,S,NUCLEARREGULATORYCOMMISSIONUnderDOEContractNo.DE-AC07-76ID01570FINNo.A6600~~E&Z&IdahoI1
'tv'!r EGG-EA-6432CONFORMANCETONRRGENERICLETTER82-16ST.LUCIEPLANTUNITNOS1AND2R.VanderBeekPublishedOctober1983EGKGIdaho,Inc.IdahoFalls,Idaho83415PreparedfortheU.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommissionAtlanta,Georgia30303UnderDOEContractNo.DE-AC07-76ID01570FINNo.A6600 ABSTRACTThisEGKGIdaho,Inc.,reportevaluatesthesubmittalprovidedbyFloridaPowerandLightCompany(FPL)forSt.LuciePlantUnitNos.1and2.ThesubmittalisinresponsetoGenericLetterNo.82-16,"NUREG-0737TechnicalSpecifications.(TS)".Applicablesectionsoftheplants'Sareevaluatedtodeterminecompliancetotheguidelinesestablishedinthegenericletter.FOREWORDThisreportissuppliedaspartofhe"TechnicalAssistanceforOperatingReactorsLicensingActions"beingconductedfortheU.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommissionRegionIIbyEG5GIdaho,Inc.,NRCLicensingSupportSection.TheU.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommissionFundedtheworkunderauthorizationBAR92-19-20-10,FINNo.A6600;DocketNos.50-335and50-389TACNos.49760andR2X162 CONTENTSABSTRACT...............FOREWORD,.INTRODUCTION2.'.REVIEWREQUIREMENTS~~~~~0~~~~2.1STATraining(I.A.1.1.3)t2.2ShiftManning-OvertimeLimits(I.A.1.3.1)2.3ShortTermAuxiliaryFeedwaterSystem(ARlS)Evaluation(II.E.1.1)2.42.5SafetyGradeAFWInitiationandFlowIndication(II.E.1.2)DedicatedHydrogenPenetr'ations(II.E.4.))~~~~~32.6ContainmentPressureSetpoint(II.E.4.2.5)2.7ContainmentPurgeValves(II.E.4.2.6)2.8RadiationSignalonPurgeValves(II.E.4.2.7)...........'...42.9UpgradeBabcockandWil'cox(B&W)AFWS(II.K.2.8)2.10B&WSafety-GradeAnticipatoryReactorTrip(II.K.2.10)2.11B&WThermal-MechanicalReport(II.K.2.13)2.12ReportingSafetyandReliefValveFailuresandChallenges(II.K.3.3)2.13AnticipatoryTriponTurbineTrip(II.K.3~12)3.EVALUATION3.1STATraining(I.A.1.1.3)3.2ShiftManning-OvertimeLimits(I.A.1.3.1)3.3ShortTermAuxiliaryFeedwaterSystem(AFWS)Evaluation(II.E.1.1)3.4SafetyGradeAuxiliaryFeedwater(AFW)InitiationandFlowIndication(II.E.1.2)3.5DedicatedHydrogenPenetrations(II.E.4.1)55 3.6ContainmentPressureSetpoint(II.E.4.2.5)3.7ContainmentPurgeValves(II.E.4.2.6)3.8RadiationSignalonPurgeValves(II.E.4.2.7)3.9"UpgradeBabcockandWilcox(B&W)AFWS(II.K.2.8)3~10B&WSafety-GradeAnticipatoryReactorTrip(II.K.2.10)3.11B&WThermal-MechanicalReport(II.K.2.13)10103~12ReportingSafetyandReliefValveFailuresandChallenges(II.K.3.3)123.13AnticipatoryTriponTurbineTrip(II.K.3.12)..............124.CONCLUSIONS5.REFERENCES1314 CONFORMANCETONRRGENERICLETTER82"16ST.LUCIEPLANTUNITNOS1AND21.INTRODUCTIONOnSeptember20,1982,GenericLetter82-16wasissuedby1D.G.Eisenhut,DirectorofLicensing,OfficeofNuclearReactorRegula'tion(NRR),toallpressurizedpowerreactorlicensees.Thisletteridentified'numberofitemsrequiredbyNUREG-0737tobeimplementedinthe2licensee'sTechnicalSpecifications(TS)byDecember31,1981.Eachlicenseewasrequestedtoreviewtheirfacility'sTS,toaddressareasofcompliance.,andtoidentifydeviationsorabsenceofaspecificationfortheitemsidentifiedin.thegenericletterwithin90daysofreceiptoftheletter.TheFloridaPowerandLightCompany..(FPL),thelicenseeforSt.LuciePlantUnitNos.1and2,providedaresponsetothegenericletteronDecember22,1982,forSt.LuciePlant.UnitNo.1.TheNUREG-0737items3forSt.'LuciePlantUnitNo.2werecoveredinAmendment5totheFinalSafetyAnalysisReport(FSAR)forSt.LuciePlantUnitNo.2.Thisinterimreportprovidesanevaluationofthelicensee'sTSandNuclearRegulatoryCommission(NRC)correspondencewiththelicenseepertainingtothoseitemsidentifiedinthegenericletter.
2.REVIEWREQUIREMENTSThereviewconsistsofevaluating<helicensee'sresponse,currentlyapprovedTS,andotherNRRapprovalsagains.thecriteriasetforthinGenericLetter82-16.TheNUREG-0737itemsandthecriteriaestablishedareasfollows:2.1STATraininI.A.1.1.3ThelicenseeistoaddresswithintheirTSthatashift,technicaladvisor(STA)totheshiftsupervisorisp0ovided.Inaddition,thequalifications,training,.andon-dutyrequirementsfortheSTAshouldbestated.2.2Sh-iftMannin-Ov'ertimeLimi'tsI.A.1.3.1Thelicenseeistoprovidechanaesto.heirTSprovidingovertimeadministrativeprocedureandstaffingrequirements.Thefollowing'guidelineswereestablishedforthelicenseebytheNRC."a~Anindividualshouldnotbepermittedtoworkmorethan16hoursstraight(excludingshiftturnovertime).b.Anindividualshouldnotbepermittedtoworkmorethan16hoursinany24-hourperiod,normorethan24hoursinany48-hourperiod,normorethan72hoursinanysevendayperiod(allexcludingshiftturnovertime).c.Abreakofatleasteighthoursshouldbeallowedbetweenworkperiods(includingshiftturnovertime).d.Exceptduringextendedshutdownperiods,theuseofovertimeshouldbeconsideredonanindividualbasisandno.fortheentiresaffonashift.Recognizingthatveryunusualcircumstancesmayariserequi~ingdeviationfromtheaboveguidelines,suchdeviationshallbeauthorizedbytheplantmanagerorhisdeputy,orhigherlevelsofmanaoement.Theparamountconsiderationinsuchauthorizationshallbethatsignificantreductionsintheeffectivenessofoperatingpersonnelwouldbehighlyun1ike1y.
Inaddition,proceduresareencouraoedthatwouldallowlicensed'operatorsatthecontrolstobeperiodicallyrelievedandassignedtoothe'rdutiesawayfromthecontrolboardduringtheirtourofduty."52.3ShortTermAuxiliarFeedwaterSstemAFWSEvaluationII.E.1.1Theobjectiveofthisitemistoimprovethereliabilityandperformanceoftheauxiliaryfeedwater(AFW)system.TSdependontheresultsofthelicensee'sevaluationandthestaffreview,andarebeingdevelopedseparatelyforeachplant.Thelimitingconditionsofoperation(LCO's)andsurveillancerequirementsfortheAFWsystemshouldbesimilar1toothersafety-relatedsystems.2.4SafetGradeAFWInitiationandFlowIndicationII.E.1.2TheAFWsystemautomaticinitiationsystemwastohavebeencontrolgrade'byJune1,1980,andsafetygradebyJuly1,1981;theAFWsystemflowindicationwastohavebeencontrolgradebyJanuary1,1980,andsafetygradebyJuly1,1981.2.5DedicatedHdroaenPenetrationsII.E.4.1Plantsthatuseexterna1'recombikersorpurgesys.emsforfpost-accidentcombustiblegascontrolofthecontainmentatmosphereshouldprovidecontainment'penetrationsdedicatedtothatservice.Insatisfyinghisitem,someplantsmayhavetoaddsomeadditionalpipingandvalves.Ifso,theseval.vesshouldbesubjectedtotherequirementsofAppendixJof10CFR50,andtheTSshouldbemodifi'edaccordingly.2.6ContainmentPressureSetoointII.E.4.2.5Thecontainmentpressuresetpointthat.initiatescontainmentisolationmustbereducedto'theminimumcompatiblewithnormaloperatingconditions.Hostplantsprovidedj.ustificationfornotchangingtheirsetpointandtheNRChasapprovedtheirjustificationbyseparatecorrespondence.The.remainingplantsmustsubmitachangetotheTSwith the.lowercontainmentpressuresetpointandprovidejustificationifthissetpointismorethan1psiabovemaximumexpectedcontainmentpressureduringnormaloperation.12.7ContainmentPuraeValvesII.E.4.2.6ModelTSweresentseparatelytoeachplantaspartoftheoverallcontainmentpurgereview.TheseTSincludetherequirementthatthecontainmentpurgevalvesbelockedclosedexceptforsafetyrelatedac.ivities,verifiedclosedatleastevery31days,and.besubjectedtole'akageratelimits.2.8RadiationSianalonPuroeValvesII.E.4.2.7Thecontainmentpurgevalvesmustclosepromptlytoreducetheamountofradiationreleasedoutsidecontainmentfollowingareleaseofradioactivematerialstocontainment.TSshouldincludetherequirementthataleastoneradiationmonitorthatautomaticallyclosesthepurgevalvesuponsensinghighradiationinthecontainmentatmospherebeoperableatalltimesexceptcoldshutdownsandrefuelingoutaoes.Ifnot0operable,ei.hertheplantshouldbeginproceeding'ocoldshutdownwithin24hoursorthepurgevalvesshouldbeclosedwithin24hours.ModelTSwereprovidedinStandardTechnicalSpecificationsformatforthoseplantsthatareusingsafety-gradecomponentstosatisfytherequirement.12.9UradeBabcockandWi1coxB8WAFWSII.K.2.8Additionallong-termAFWSmodificationsweretobeperformedinconjuctionwithGenericLetter82-l6Items3and4(Items2.3and2.4above).TheTSimplementedforItems3and4wi1.1alsoaddresstheupgradeof'theBEWAFWS;thereforenoseparateTSwouldberequiredforthisitemfortheBKWPlants.
2.10BEWSafet-GradeAnicioa.orReactorTriII.K.2.10Safety-gradeturbinetripequipmentinitiatingareactortripwastobeimplementedbytheBEWdesignedplantsaspartoftheTMIlessonslearned.ThelicenseeistoimplementintheTSthetripsetpoint,numberofchannels,tripconditions,minimalchannelsrequiredforoperation,applicableoperatingmodes,actionstobetaken,surveillancerequiredandanyotherrequirementsforsafety-gradeequipment.2.11BEWThermal-MechanicalReportII.~.13LicenseesofMWoperatingreactorswererequiredtosubmit,byJanuary1,1981,ananalysisofthethermal-,mechanicalconditionsinthereactorvesselduringrecoveryfromsmallbreakswithanextendedlossofallfeedwater.TS,ifrequired,willbedeterminedfollowingNRCstaffreview.12.12ReoortinSafestandRelief.ValveFailuresand.ChallenoesII.K.3.3NUREG-0660statedthatsafetyandrelief.valvefailuresbereportedpromptlyandchallengesbereportedannually.ThesectionsoftheTSthatdiscussreportingrequirementsshouldbeaccordinglychanged.TheNRChasnotedthatanacceptablealternativewouldbetoreportchallengesmonthly.12.13AnticioatorTrioonTurbineTriII.K.3.12LicenseeswithWestinghouse-designedoperatingplantshaveconfirmedthattheirplantshaveananticipatoryreactortripuponturbinetrip.ManyoftheseplantsalreadyhavethistripintheTS.Forthosethatdonot,theanticipatorytripshouldbeaddedtotheTS.1FortheSt.LuciePlantUnit1and2,theaboveItems2.9,2.10,and2.11arenotbeingevaluated.BeingaCombustionEngineeringdesign, Items2.9and2.10arenotapplicableforSt.LuciePlantUnit1and2.ForItem2.11,FPL'sThermal-MechanicalReportisbeinohandledasanactiveThreeNileIsland(TMI)actioni.emunderTAGnumber46905forSt.LuciePlantUnit1.
3.EVALUATIONTheevaluationsofGenericLetter82-16Itemsareasfollows:3.1STATraininI.A.1.1.3ThelicenseehasstatedinhisresponseforSt~LucieUnit1thatthisitemwasaddressedbyTSAmendmentNo.37.InTable6.2-1ofbothSt.LuciePlantUnit1and2TS,'heSTAisdesignatedasbeingrequired6,7intheminimalshiftcrewcompositionforoperationalmodes1,2,3,or4.Section6.3.1specifies"heShiftTechnicalAdvisorwhoshallhaveabachelor'sdegreeorequivalentinascientificorengineeringdisciplinewithspecifictraininginplantdesignandintheresponseandanalysisoftheplantfortransientsandaccidents."Theretrainingandreplacement)i6trainingprogramforthefacilitystaffisstatedinSection6.4.1oftheTS.TheexacttrainingprogramfortheSTAisnotintheTS.InAmendment5totheSt.LuciePlantUnit2FSARAppendix1.9A,the4NUREG-0737'itemsareaddressed.TnelicenseestatesthatChapter13oftheFSARhasbeenrevisedtoaddresstherequiremenofNUREG-0737ItemI.A.l.l.Subsection13.1.2.2specifiestheresponsibility,authority,phaseoWplans,andreportingrelationships;subsection13.1.3.1and13.2.1.1.2specifythetrainingrequirements.InaletterfromtheNRCtothelicensee,datedJanuary26,1982,8theNRCstatedthatItemI.A.1.1.3ofNUREG-0737isresolved.UntilfurherguidanceisissuedbytheCommission,nofurtherlicensingactionisrequiredforthisitem.3.2ShiftHannin-Over.imeLimitsI.A.1.3.1ThelicenseehasstatedinhisresponseforSt.LuciePlantUnit1thattheovertimelimitationsareadequatelyenforcedbyadministrativeproceduresandthatnoamendmenttotheTSisnecessaryatthistime.This policywasacceptedbytheNRCintheletterfromR.A.ClarktoR.E.Uhrig,datedFebruary4,1982.TheTSforSt.LucieUnit1donotcontainanyshiftmanningovertimelimitationrequirements.Section6.2.2oftheSt.LucieUnit2TScontainstheovertimelimi'.sasspecifiedinGenericLetter82-12andisthereforeincompletecompliancewithNUREQ-0737ItemI.A.1.3.1.OnJune30,1983,anotegramfromD.C.Fischer,LeadProjecManager10forthemaintopicI.A~1.3wassenttotheoperatingreactorprojectmanagerforSt.LuciePlantUnit1requestingthattheTACnumberbeclosedou.forItemI.A.1.3.1onSt.LuciePlantUnit1.Nofurtherlicensingactionisrequiredforthisitem.3.3ShortTermAuxiliarFeedwaterSstemAFWSEvaluationII.E.1.1ThelicenseehasstatedinhisresponsethattheexistingSt.LuciePlantUnit1AFWSTSlimitingconditionsofoperationandsurveillance,requirementsaresimilarto.thatofothersafetyrelatedsystems.Section3.7,1.2and4.7.1.2oftheSt.LuciePlantUnits1and2TSprovidetheconditionforoperationandthesurveillancerequirements.Inenclosure2oftheFPLlettertotheNRC,datedJanuary2,111981,thelicenseeaddressesNUREG-0737ItemII.E.1.1forSt.LuciePlantUnit,1.-TheenclosureisareportwhichprovidesthedescriptionofAFWSmodificationstobeimplementedbyJanuary1,1982andthesafetyevaluaionofthesystem.Amendment5totheSt.LuciePlantUnit2FSARAppendix1.9AaddressesNUREG-0737ItemII.E.1.1.AreliabilityanalysiswasperformedtodeterminedominantfailuremodesandassessAFWSreliabilitylevels.TheresultsofthereliabilityevaluationareprovidedinAppendix10.4.9BoftheFSAR.AsafetyreviewwasalsoprovidedusingtheguidanceinStandardReview.Plan10.4.9.TheresultsareprovidedinAppendix10.4.9.AoftheFSAR.
ReviewoftheTSforSt.LuciePlantUnits1and2indicatedthatthelimitingconditionsofoperationandsurveillancerequirementsaresimilartothoseothersafety-relatedsystemsidentifiedintheTS.Nofurtherlicensingactionisrequiredforthisitem.3.4SafetGradeAFWInitiationandFlowIndicationII.E.1.2ThelicenseehasstatedinhisresponseforSt.LuciePlantUnit1thatTSAmendmentNo.37,whi.chwasapprovedbytheNRCJanuary19,1981,containsalltheinformationpertainingtothesafetygradeAFWSysteminitiationandflowindication.Inenclosure2oftheFPLlettertotheNRC,datedJanuary2,1981,thelicenseeaddressesNUREG-0737ItemICE.1.2forSt.LuciePlantUnit1.ThisitemiscoveredforS.LuciePlantUnit2inAmendment5totheFSARinAppendix1.9A.ReviewoftheTSforSt.LuciePlantUnits1and2indicatesthattheAFWinitiationandflowindicationaresafetygrade.Nofurtherlicensingactionisrequiredforthisitem.3.5DedicatedHdrooenPenetrationsII.E.4.1ThelicenseehasstatedinhisresponseforSt.LuciePlantUnit1thattheirhydrogenrecombinersareinternalbutthatahydrogenpurgesystemwasinstalledandtheSt.LuciePlantUnit1TSsubjectsthehydrogenpurgevalvestothecriteriaspecifiedinAppendixJof10CFR50.InAmendment5toSt.LuciePlantUnit2FSAR,thelicenseehasstatedthatredundantinternalhydrogenrecombinersareprovided.Therefore,NUREG-0737ItemI.E.4.1isnotapplicabletoSt.LuciePlantUnit2.AdiscussionoftheinternalhydrogenrecombinersisprovidedinSubsecion6.2.5oftheFSAR.ReviewoftheSt.LuciePlantUnit1TSindicatesthatthevalvesaresubjecttotherequirementsofAppendixJof10CFR50andsinceSt.LuciePlanUnit2utilizesinternalhydrogenrecombinersandapparentlyhasnot addedadditionalpipingandvalves,itisconcludedthatheNUREG-0737itemrequirementsaremet.Nofurtherlicensingactionisrequiredforthisitern.3.6ContainmentPressureSetoointII.E.4.2.5ThelicenseehasstatedinhisresponseforSt.LuciePlantUnit1thatanalysiswasprovidedtotheNRCjustifyingthepresentsetpointforcontainmentpressure.TheNRCacceptedthepresentsetpointiniheleterR.A:ClarkcoR.E.Uhrig,datedJanuary20,1982.12ReviewofTable2.2-1oftheTSforSt.LuciePlantUnit2indicatesthesetpointlimitsareinaccordance-'otherecommendedguidelinesofGenericLetter82-16.Nofur.herlicensingac.ionisrequiredforthisitem.3.7ContainmentPuroeValveII.E.4.2.6Thelicenseehas.statedinhisresponseforSt.LuciePlantUnit1t'hataresponsewasprovidedtotheNRCinFPLletterL-82-317,datedJuly30,1982.However,itisnotindicatedthatanNRCacceptancewasgiven.ReviewoftheTSforSt.LuciePlantUnit1indicaesthat~compliancetoGenericLetter82-16hasnotbeenmet..TheSt.LuciePlantUnit2TSSection3/4.6providestheinformationonthecontainmentpurgevalvelimitingconditionforoperation,surveillancerequirements,andthetestingtobeperformedonthevalves.TheTSSection3.6.1.7specifieshatthepurgevalvesbesealedclosedandverifiedatleastonceper31daysexceptforsafetyrelatedactivities.TheTSleaktestingistypeCwhichisperformedwithgasatintervalsnogreaterthan24mon.hs.St.Lucie'lantUnit2TSmeetstherecommendedguidanceofGenericLeter82"16.NofurtherlicensingactionisneededforUnit2.10
~~3.8RadiationSinalonPureValvesII.E.4.2.7ThelicenseehassatedinhisresponseforSt.LuciePlantUnit1thattheexistingTSrequiresthatwithin24hours,theplantbeginsproceedingtocoldshutdownshouldallcontainmentradiationmonitorsfail.Alsothecontainmentisolationisinitiatedbyhighradiation(andothersignals)closingthepurgevalves.ReviewoftheTSforSt.LuciePlantUnits1and2indicatethattherequirementsofNUREG-0737ItemII.E.4.2.7havebeenmet.Nofurtherlicensingactionisrequiredforthisitem.3.9UpgradeBabcockandWilcox.B8WAFWSII.K.2.8St.LuciePlantUnits1and2areaCombustionEngineeringdesignand,therefore,therequiremeRtsofthisitemarenotapplicable.Nolicensingactionisrequired.3.10B&WSafet-GradeAnticiatorReactorTriII.K,2.10~'t.LuciePlantUnits1and2areaCombustionEngineeringdesignand,therefore,therequiremen'tsofthisitemarenotapplicable.TheanticipatorytripisevaluatedunderNUREG-0737ItemII.K.3.3forthe'Westinghousedesign.Nolicensingactionisrequired.3.11BKWThermal-MechanicalReortII.K.2.13St.LuciePlantUnits1and2areaCombustionEngineeringdesignand,therefore',therequirementsofthisitemarenotapplicable.IthasbeennotedthatthereisanactiveTMIactionitemThermal-MechanicalReportforSt.LuciePlantUnit1underTACNumber46905.NolicensingactionisrequiredbyGenericLetter82-16forthisitem.11 3.12ReoortinoSafetandReliefValveFailuresandChallenaesII.K.3.3ThelicenseehasstatedinhisresponseforSt.LuciePlantUnit1thatacommitment.oreportsafetyandreliefvalvechallengesonanannualIbasiswasgivenintheirletterL-80-184,datedJuly13,'1980.ThelicenseealsocommittedtomakebothTScompatibletotherequirementsofGene.icLetter82-16followingfinalizationoftheSt.LuciePlantUnit2TS.ReviewoftheSt.LuciePlantUnit1TSindicatesthatSec.ion6.9.1.6hasnotbeenamendedyettoincludethereportingonamonthlybasisforall'challengestothevalves.St.LuciePlantUnit2TSSection6.9.1.6is'ncompliancewiththerequirementsoGenericLetter82-16.NofurtherlicensingactionisrequiredforS.LuciePlantUnit2.3.13AnticioatorTrioonTurbineTripII.K.3.12ThelicenseehasstatedinhisresponseforSt.LuciePlantUnit1thatalthoughnotaWestinghousedesign,theTSadequatelycovertheanticipatorytriponturbinetrip.ReviewoftheTSTables2.2-1,3.3-1and3.3-2indicatethattherequirementssetforthinGenericLetter82-16havebeenmet.Nofurtherlicensingactionisrequired.12 4.CONCLUSIONSBasedonourreview,wefindthelicenseeconformstothoseissuesaddressedinGenericLetter82-16onTS,exceptforthoseidentifiedasfollows:1.,Section3.1STATraining-UntilfurtherguidanceisprovidedbytheCommission,nofurtherlicensingactioncanbetakentodeterminewhethertheexacttrainingprogramfortheSTAisrequiredtobeintheTS.2.Section3.2Shif-Manning-OvertimeLimits-St.LuciePlantUnit1TSdonotcontainshift-manningovertimelimits,however,FPL'sovertimelimitspolicywasacceptedbytheNRC.3.Section3.7ContainmentPurgeValve-St.LuciePlantUnit1TSdanotcomplywiththe,requirementsofGenericLetter82-16.4.Section3.11Thermal-MechanicalReport-TheThermal-Mechanical,ReportforSt.LuciePlantUnitNo.1isbeinghandledasanactiveTMIactionitemunderTACnumber46905:Thereisnoidentified'TMIactionitemfortheSt.LuciePlantUnitNo.2Thermal-MechanicalReport.GenericLetter82-16doesnotrequireanylicensingactionforthisitem.5.Section3,.12ReportingSafetyandReliefValveFailuresandChallenges-ThepresentSt.LuciePlantUnit1TSdonotcomplywiththerequirementsofGenericLetter82-16.However,FPLispresentlyupdatingtheSt.LucieUnit1TStoconformwiththeSt.LucieUnit2TS.Whenthisi5completedandapprovedbytheNRC,theSt.LucieUnit1TSshouldbeincompliancewithiherequirementsofGenericLetter82-16.13 5.REFERENCESD.G.Eisenhut,NRClettertoAllPressurizedPowerReactorLicensees,"NUREG-0737TechnicalSpecifications(GenericLetter82-16),"September20,1982.NUREG-0737,ClarificationofTMIActionPlanRequirements,publishedbytheDivisionofLicensing,OfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation,U.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommission,November1980.R.E.Uhrig,FloridaPowerandLightlettertoD.G.Eisenhut;OfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation,"St.LucieUnit1,DocketNo.50-335,NUREG-0737TechnicalSpecifications,"December22,1982.R.E.Uhrig,FloridaPowerandLightCompanylettertoD.G.Eisenhut;OfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation,"St.LucieUnit2,DocketNo.50-389Amendment5totheFinalSafetyAnalysisReport,"L-81-351,August12',1981.D.G.Eisenhut,NRClettertoAllLicenseesofOperatingPlans,ApplicansforanOperatingLicense,andHoldersofConstructionPermits,"NuclearPowerPlantStaffWorkingHours(GenericLetterNo.82-12),"June15,1982.St.LuciePlantUnit1TechnicalSpecifications,AppendixAtoLicenseNo.DPR-67,March1,1976,AmendmentNo.58.TechnicalSpecifications,St.LuciePlantUnit2,DocketNo.50-389,AppendixAtoLicenseNo.NPF-16,April1983.R.A.Clark,NRClettertoR.E.Uhrig,FloridaPowerandLighgCompany,"NUREG-0737ItemI.A.1.1ShiftTechnicalAdvisor(STA),"January26,1982.R.A.Clark,NRClettertoR.E.Uhrig,FloridaPowerandLightCompany,"TMIActionPlantItemsI.A.1.3,I.C.5,andI.C.6asDescribedinNUREG-0737,"February4,1982..D.C.Fischer,LeadProjectManagerforI.A.1.3,notegramtoalloperatingreactorprojectmanaoers,"TACCloseout"June30,1983'.R.E.Uhrio,FlordiaPowerandLiohtCompanylet.ertoD.G.Eisenhut;OfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation,"St.LucieUnit1,DocketNo.50-335.PostTMIRequirements."L-81-4,January2,1981.R.A.Clark,NRClettertoR.E.Uhrig,FloridaPowerandLightCompany,"NUREG-0737ItemII.E.4.2(5)forSt.LucieUnit1,"January20,1982.14 U.S.NUCLEARREGULATORYCOMMISSIONBIBLIOGRAPHICDATASHEET4.TITLEiANOSUBTITLECONFORMANCETONRRGENERICLETTER82-16.ST.LUCIEPLANTUNITNOS1AND21.REPORTNUMBER(Asssgned*yDOC/,EGG-EA-64322./Leeeedlenk/3.RECIPIENT'SACCESSIONNO.7.AUTHORIS)R.VanderBeek9.PERFORMINGORGANIZATIONNAMEANOMAILINGAOORESS/IncludeZipCode/EG8GIdaho,Inc.IdahoFalls,ID8341512.SPONSORINQORGANIZATIONNAMEANOMAILINQAOORESS/IncludeZipCods'IDivisionofPro'ectndidntP1U.S.Nuc',earReguatoryCommission101MariettaStreetSuite29005.OATEREPORTCOMPLETEOMONTHYEARDATEREPORTISSUEOMONTHOctober6./LeeeeolenklYEAR1983B./Leeeeolenkl11FINNo.10,PROJECT/TASK/WORKUNITNO,13TYPEOFREPORTuERIOOCOYERED/Inclusivedeses/15.SUPPLEMENTARYNOTES14/Leereormki16,ABSTRACTI200wordsorress/ThisEG8GIdaho,Inc.,reportevaluateswhetherthedesignatedOperatingReactorPlanthasconformedtotherequirementsoftheNRRGenericLetterNo.82-16,"NUREG-0737TechnicalSpecifications."17,KEYWOROS*NOOOCUMENTANALYSIS17s.OESCRIPTORSIjb,IOENTIFIERSI'OPENENOEOTFRMSIB.AVAILABILITYSTATEMENTUnlimitedNACFORM335sslSll'19.SECURITYCLASSIrnisreooislUnclassified20.SECURITYCLASS/TliSpete/Unclas'fi21O'OOFPAGES22PRICE5 hil'4ItI