ML24215A064

From kanterella
Revision as of 14:21, 24 November 2024 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
LLC, Response to Sdaa Audit Question Number A-3.9.2-25
ML24215A064
Person / Time
Site: 05200050
Issue date: 08/02/2024
From:
NuScale
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML24215A000 List: ... further results
References
LO-169995
Download: ML24215A064 (1)


Text

Response to SDAA Audit Question Question Number: A-3.9.2-25 Receipt Date: 10/16/2023 Question:

"NuScale provided report (( 2(a),(c),ECI which includes updated plots of (( }} 2(a),(c),ECI Provide the accompanying (( }} 2(a),(c),ECI 2. Figure (( }} 2(a),(c),ECI NuScale is asked to respond to the following questions: What test conditions do these correspond to? What is causing the additional strain? What is the relative phasing between different strain gages at the same tube locations (relative phasing can differentiate between uniform expansion and bending). What estimated stresses correspond to these strains?"

Response

Item 1: The accompanying plot for (( }}2(a),(c),ECI is shown in Figure 1. NuScale Nonproprietary NuScale Nonproprietary

Figure 1: (( }}2(a),(c),ECI Item 2: Figure ((

}}2(a),(c),ECI NuScale Nonproprietary NuScale Nonproprietary

(( }}2(a),(c),ECI Figure 2: (( }}2(a),(c),ECI NuScale Nonproprietary NuScale Nonproprietary

Figure 3: (( }}2(a),(c),ECI As discussed above, within the limitations of the test facility, unconstrained thermal expansion explains the trends in the data. Unconstrained thermal expansion elongates the tubes but does not cause stress cycles. No changes to the SDAA are necessary. NuScale Nonproprietary NuScale Nonproprietary}}