ML23087A036

From kanterella
Revision as of 01:42, 15 November 2024 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

PSDAR Review Letter
ML23087A036
Person / Time
Site: Palisades Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 05/02/2023
From: Tanya Hood
Reactor Decommissioning Branch
To: Fleming J
Holtec Decommissioning International
Hood T
Shared Package
ML23087A035 List:
References
eConcurrence 20230328-30026, EPID L-2022-LRO-0073
Download: ML23087A036 (9)


Text

May 2, 2023

Jean A. Fleming, Vice President, Licensing, Regulatory Affairs and PSA Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC Krishna P. Singh Technology Campus 1 Holtec Blvd Camden, NJ 08104

SUBJECT:

PALISADES NUCLEAR PLANT - REVIEW OF THE POST-SHUTDOWN DECOMMISSIONING ACTIVITIES REPORT (EPID L-2022-LRO-0073)

Dear Jean Fleming:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the U.S. Nucle ar Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) staff has completed its review of the post-shut down decommissioning activities report (PSDAR), and the Site-Specific Decommissionin g Cost Estimate (DCE) for the Palisades Nuclear Plant (Palisades) and finds that it contains the information required by Section 50.82(a)(4)(i) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR).

By letters dated September 28, 2017, and October 19, 2017 (Agen cywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession Nos. ML17271A233 and ML17292A032, respectively), in accordance with 10 CFR 50.4(b)(8) and 10 CFR 50.82(a)(1)(i), Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy), which was the licensee at that time, notified the NRC it they had decided to permanently cease power operations at Palisades by M ay 31, 2022.

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.82(a)(1)(ii), by letter dated June 13, 20 22 (ML22164A067), Entergy certified to the NRC that the fuel had been permanently removed from the Palisades reactor vessel and placed in the spent fuel pool. Upon the docketing of these certifications, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.82(a)(2), the Palisades license no lo nger authorizes operation of the reactor or emplacement or retention of fuel into the reacto r vessel. The spent fuel from Palisades is stored in the spent fuel pool and in dry cask sto rage at the onsite independent spent fuel storage installation, where it will remain until it is shipped offsite.

By Order dated December 13, 2021 ( ML21292A155), the NRC approved the transfer of the Palisades Renewed Facility Operating License (No. DPR-20) from Entergy and Entergy Nuclear Palisades, LLC, to Holtec International (Holtec) and Holtec Dec ommissioning International, LLC.

This transfer was executed on June 28, 2022 ( ML22173A179), such that Holtec Palisades, LLC and Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC became the licens ees for Palisades, hereafter referred to as the licensee. The execution of the Palisades lic ense transfer transaction allowed the NRC staff to begin the review of the licensees PSDAR and D CE for Palisades, submitted by letter dated December 23, 2020 ( ML20358A232), as supplemented by letter dated March 1, 2023 (ML23060A039) under 10 CFR 50.82.(a)(4)(i).

The purposes of a PSDAR and DCE are to: (1) inform the public o f the licensees planned decommissioning activities, (2) assist in the scheduling of NRC resources necessary for the appropriate oversight activities during decommissioning, (3) en sure that the licensee has J. Fleming

considered all of the costs for the planned decommissioning act ivities and has considered the funding necessary for the dismantlement process, and (4) ensure that the environmental impacts of the planned decommissioning activities are bounded b y those considered in existing environmental impact statements for the site.

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.82(a)(4)(i), the PSDAR must contain a des cription of the planned decommissioning activities along with a schedule for their acco mplishment, a discussion that provides the reasons for concluding that the environmental impa cts associated with site-specific decommissioning activities will be bounded by appropriate previ ously issued environmental impact statements, and a site-specific DCE, including the proje cted cost of managing irradiated fuel. Additionally, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.82(a)(3), decommissio ning is to be completed within 60 years of permanent cessation of operations. The associated d ecommissioning regulations do not require the NRC to approve a licensees PSDAR; rather, NRC approval is required later in the decommissioning process, with regard to NRC review and appr oval of the licensees license termination plan, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.82(a)(9)-(10).

In a request for additional information (RAI) dated February 14, 2023 (ML23055A152), the NRC transmitted to the licensee two RAIs in order to support the de termination that the site-specific environmental impacts of decommissioning are adequately address ed in the licensees PSDAR.

The licensee stated in its RAI response dated March 1, 2023 ( ML23060A039), that Palisades will be implementing an incremental active decommissioning (DEC ON) method as described in NUREG-0586, Supplement 1, Generic Environmental Impact Stateme nt [GEIS] on Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities, dated November 2002, Vo lumes 1 and 2 (ML023470327 and ML023500228, respectively). This will give the licensee the opportunity to perform some incremental decontamination and dismantlement acti vities before or during the storage period of SAFSTOR. Under the current regulations, unles s the licensee receives permission to the contrary, the site must be decommissioned wit hin 60 years (i.e., May 2082).

Consistent with 10 CFR 50.82(a)(4)(ii), the public was offered an opportunity to comment on the Palisades PSDAR and DCE. A notice of receipt of the Palisades P SDAR and DCE was published in the Federal Register (FR) on August 26, 2022 (87 FR 52598). The NRC staff requested that all comments be submitted by December 27, 2022. There were 18 comments submitted to the docket related to the Palisades PSDAR and DCE. Comments that were submitted electronically can be viewed at www.regulations.gov by searching for Docket ID NRC-2022-0158 and selecting Open Docket Folder.

Additionally, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.82(a)(4)(ii), the NRC staff held a public meeting at the South Haven campus of Lake Michigan College in South Haven, Mic higan, on September 22, 2022, to describe the decommissioning process, re ceive comments, and answer questions regarding both the Palisades PSDAR and DCE. A meeting summary dated October 31, 2022, can be found at ADAMS Accession No. ML22292A261. A press release was issued on September 9, 2022 (NRC News Release No.22-037). Publ ic questions and comments on the PSDAR, DCE, and other matters related to the si tes decommissioning, including the NRC staffs responses, are available for review i n the transcript of the meeting (ML22292A263).

The NRC reviewed every comment to ensure that the information d id not identify any immediate radiological health and safety matters within the regulatory pu rview of the NRC and incorporated this information into the PSDAR review as appropriate. NRC staf fs review of the PSDAR consists of determining if the licensees PSDAR meets the requi rements of 10 CFR 50.82(a)(4)(i).

J. Fleming

The NRC staff notes that PSDAR comments generally fall into two categories: (1) questions and comments that are within the regulatory purview of the NRC staffs review of a PSDAR, which were considered by the NRC staff during its review of the associated PSDAR, and (2) questions and comments that, upon review, were found to be outside the regulatory authority of the NRC, or were not relevant to the NRC staff review perfor med (i.e., whether the licensees PSDAR meets the requirements of 10 CFR 50.82(a)(4)(i)) and thus were not considered. The NRC staffs review of a PSDAR does not require a response to ea ch of the comments submitted.

However, the NRC staff acknowledges the comments and typically attempts to address the more significant comments. Spec ifically, the NRC staff has identified a number of similar in-scope comments that pertain to the same topic, where a singl e response may be provided.

The NRC staffs response to these comments can be found in the enclosure to this letter.

The NRC staff reviewed the Palisades PSDAR and accompanying DCE against the requirements in 10 CFR 50.82(a). In addition, the NRC staff us ed the guidance in Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.185, Revision 1, Standard Format and Content for Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report, dated June 2013 ( ML13140A038), in conducting its review.

Based on its review, the NRC staff concludes as follows.

1. Section 2 of the Palisades PSDAR, Description of Planned De commissioning Activities, and the DCE provided most of the applicable information identif ied in Section C.1 of RG 1.185, Revision 1. The NRC staffs review determined that th e licensee needed to respond to RAIs to ensure the licensee adequately described the activities associated with the major periods or milestones related to decommissioning, as required by 10 CFR 50.82(a)(4)(i) and consistent with RG 1.185, Revision 1. The licensees RAI responses related to this area were found to be acceptable.
2. Section 3 of the Palisades PSDAR, Schedule of Planned Decom missioning Activities, and the DCE provide the estimated dates for initiation and comp letion of major decommissioning activities, as required by 10 CFR 50.82(a)(4)(i ) and consistent with Section C.2 of RG 1.185, Revision 1. The NRC staff finds that t he schedule for decommissioning activities is adequate to achieve Palisades lic ense termination within 60 years of permanent cessation of operations, as required by 1 0 CFR 50.82(a)(3).
3. Section 4 of the Palisades PSDAR, Estimate of Expected Deco mmissioning and Spent Fuel Management Costs, and the DCE provide an estimate of appr oximately

$644 million for the expected decommissioning costs for Palisad es. The decommissioning costs presented in the Palisades PSDAR report a re reported in 2020 dollars. Escalation of future decommissioning costs over the re maining decommissioning project life cycle are excluded.

The site-specific DCE is based on regulatory requirements, site conditions, Basis of Estimate assumptions, low-level radioactive waste disposal stan dards, high-level radioactive waste management options, and site restoration requ irements. The methods utilized to estimate decommissioning costs were based on the pr ofessional judgment of experienced personnel at the Palisades site, considering the na ture of the work, degree of scope definition, availability of quantifiable cost and pric ing data, among other factors.

J. Fleming

Using the formula in 10 CFR 50.75(c) and the methodology provid ed in NUREG-1713, Standard Review Plan for Decommissioning Cost Estimates for Nu clear Power Reactors, dated December 2004 ( ML043510113), and NUREG-1307, Revision 18, Report on Waste Burial Charges: Changes in Decommissioning Was te Disposal Costs at Low-Level Waste Burial Facilities, dated January 2020 ( ML21027A302), the NRC staff independently calculated the 2020 minimum decommissioning financial assurance formula amount to be $486 million per unit (2020 dollars).

The licensee opted to provide a site-specific decommissioning c ost amount in lieu of using the minimum decommissioning financial assurance amount. A s reported in the Palisades DCE, the licensees 2020 site-specific decommissionin g cost estimate is approximately $644 million. This amount includes the revised es timate for license termination expenses of $443 million, the current separate esti mate of spent fuel management costs of $166 million and the current separate estim ate for site restoration costs of $35 million. The NRC staff noted that the site-specifi c cost estimate relies on estimated Palisades site-specific radiological decommissioning costs of $443 million, which is lower than the 10 CFR 50.75(c) minimum formula amount of $486 million.

During the license transfer application process, the licensee p rovided their justification for using a total site-specific radiological decommissioning co st estimate value that is less than the minimum formula amount. The NRC staff reviewed th e licensees justification and agreed with the assessment. As such, the NRC staff found the justification for a decommissioning cost estimate less than the generic formula reasonable. Therefore, the NRC staff finds that the Palisades D CE amount conforms to the guidance in NUREG-1713 and meets the regulations in 10 CFR 50.75.

The NRC staff considered the adequacy of available funding to s afely decommission Palisades. In the licensee Decommissioning Funding Status Repor t dated March 31, 2023 (ML23090A140), the licensee stated that the trust fund balance for Palisades as of December 31, 2022, was $547 million. The trust fund amount is the total available for decommissioning including costs of license termin ation, spent fuel management, and site restoration activities. The total is provi ded because the licensee received an exemption (ML21286A294) from 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) to allow the Palisades trust fund to be used for site irradiated fuel manage ment and site restoration costs. In order to determine that adequate funds would be avail able for radiological decommissioning, the NRC staff performed a cash flow analysis u sing the costs listed by year in the DCE and the balances in the trust fund as of Decemb er 31, 2022. This analysis also assumed a conservative 2% return on the decommiss ioning trust fund balances, as prescribed by 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(ii). Based on thi s analysis, the NRC staff concluded that a positive ending balance in the trust fund is a chieved in the last year of spent fuel management assumed in the PDSAR and DCE (2041), indi cating that sufficient funding is available to decommission Palisades.

Based on its review of the Palisades DCE, the NRC staff finds t hat the licensee has demonstrated reasonable assuranc e that funding will be availabl e to decommission Palisades pursuant to the DECON and SAFSTOR methods as describe d in the PSDAR.

The NRC staff verified that the DCE amount was more than the de commissioning financial assurance formula amount required by 10 CFR 50.75(c). The DCE included an up-to-date listing of major factors that could affect the cost to decommission Palisades, and these factors were assessed by the licensee as required by 10 CFR 50.75(f)(3). The DCE also provided plans to adjust the level of funding and cost s as required by 10 CFR 50.75(c)(2), 10 CFR 50.75(f)(5), and 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)( iv).

J. Fleming

Based on the above, the NRC staff reviewed the cost estimates against the guidance in Section C.3 of RG 1.185, Revision 1, and found that the site-sp ecific DCE for decommissioning Palisades demonstrates that adequate funding is available in the Nuclear Decommissioning Trust fund to complete the planned deco mmissioning activities and pursue license termination. Therefore, the NRC s taff concludes that the licensee provided sufficient details associated with the fundin g mechanisms for decommissioning Palisades, which meets the requirements of 10 C FR 50.82(a)(4)(i).

As required by 10 CFR 50.82(a)(7), the licensee must notify the NRC in writing and send a copy to the State of Michigan before performing any decommiss ioning activity inconsistent with, or making any significant schedule change fr om, the planned decommissioning activities and schedules described in the Palis ades PSDAR, including changes that significantly increase the decommissioning costs. As required, the licensee will verify that the decommissioning activities meet the requir ements of 10 CFR 50.82(a)(6)(i) through 10 CFR 50.82(a)(6)(iii) or seek a ppropriate regulatory approval if needed before taking an action that is outside thes e provisions.

Finally, consistent with 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8), the licensee will annually submit to the NRC decommissioning financial assurance status reports, which, amon g other things, must include a discussion of additional financial assurance to cover any shortfalls, if needed.

4. Section 5 of the Palisades PSDAR, Environmental Impacts, p rovides a discussion of the potential environmental impacts associated with the planned decommissioning activities, as required by 10 CFR 50.82(a)(4)(i) and consistent with Section C.4 of RG 1.185, Revision 1. The PSDAR includes a comparison of the po tential environmental impacts from the planned Palisades decommissioning activities w ith impacts from similar activities provided in NUREG-0586, Supplement 1, Generic Envir onmental Impact Statement [GEIS] on Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities, dat ed November 2002, Volumes 1 and 2 (ML023470327 and ML023500228, respectively) (also called the Decommissioning GEIS). A licensee in decommissioning is require d to address the environmental impacts associated with site specific decommissio ning activities in both its PSDAR per 10 CFR 50.82(a)(4)(i), as well as before performing t he decommissioning activities per 10 CFR 50.82(a)(6).

The environmental impacts associated with decommissioning activ ities are generically evaluated in the Decommissioning GEIS. In the Decommissioning G EIS, the NRC staff explained the significance of the impacts and whether the envir onmental impacts of decommissioning activities are considered generic to all nuclea r power plants or site-specific to the decommissioning facility. The Decommission ing GEIS also identifies activities that can be bounded by the generic evaluations prese nted in the Decommissioning GEIS.

The licensee can therefore rely on information in the Decommiss ioning GEIS as a basis for meeting the bounding impacts requirement in 10 CFR 50.82(a) (4)(i). For environmental impacts that the Decommissioning GEIS classifies as site-specific, or for decommissioning activities that could exceed the generic enviro nmental impacts analyzed by the Decommissioning GEIS, the licensee cannot rely on the Decommissioning GEIS. The environmental impacts that must be ev aluated on site-specific basis identified in the Decommissioning GEIS applicabl e to Palisades decommissioning activities include threatened and endangered sp ecies and, J. Fleming

environmental justice. If the impacts of decommissioning activi ties fall outside the range of impacts considered in the Decommissioning GEIS (i.e., unboun ded impacts), then the activity cannot be performed until a site-specific analysis is completed and a license amendment request to perform the unbounded action is submitted to the NRC for approval.

In the Palisades PSDAR, the licensee provided a summary of the reasons for reaching the conclusion that the environmental impacts for generic issue s associated with the planned Palisades decommissioning activities are bounded by the Decommissioning GEIS or previously issued environmental impact statements. The NRC staff transmitted an RAI (ML23055A152) to the licensee to evaluate whether the PSDAR adequately demonstrates that the environmental impacts associated with site-specific decommissioning activities for Palisades will be bounded by app ropriate previously issued environmental impact statements for radiation doses, was te management, air quality, water quality, ecological resources, and socioeconomic impacts. The licensee stated in its RAI response ( ML23060A039) that their basis for concluding that the environmental impacts associated with site-specific decommissio ning activities for Palisades are bounded is consistent with the considerations in NUREG-0586.

Specifically, the licensee has not identified any planned decom missioning activities for Palisades that are outside those considered in the Decommission ing GEIS. Therefore, the licensee concluded that the potential environmental impacts associated with the planned decommissioning of Palisades are bounded by the Decommi ssioning GEIS. For generic issues, the NRC staff has concluded that the PSDAR is w ell reasoned and supports the conclusions reached that the planned impacts are b ounded by the Decommissioning GEIS.

Threatened and Endangered Species

Section 5.1.7 of the Palisades PSDAR addresses threatened and e ndangered species.

With respect to federally listed terrestrial species, the PSDAR concludes that decommissioning would not affect the Indiana bat ( Myotis sodalis), northern long-eared bat (M. septrentrionalis), piping plover (Charadrius melodus), red knot (Calidrus canutus rufa), eastern massasauga (Sistrurus catenatus), Mitchells satyr butterfly ( Neonympha mitchelli mitchelli), and Pitchers thistle (Cirsium pitcher). No critical habitats of federally listed terrestrial species occur on or near the Palisades site.

The licensee states in the PSDAR that when the additional detai ls of decommissioning activities for Palisades have been determined, such as demoliti on or disturbance of land areas that could potentially affect a protected species, the li censee will perform a review to determine if potential impacts associated with those activit ies have been adequately addressed by existing environmental impact statements and evalu ations. The licensee would address any such impacts through separate and appropriate permit or certification processes, such as through any necessary U.S. Army Corps of Eng ineers permits, or the licensee would update the site-specific assessment of threa tened and endangered species in the PSDAR and reques t the NRC to initiate Endangered Species Act consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, as approp riate.

With respect to federally listed aquatic species and critical h abitats, the PSDAR concludes that no such species or habitats occur on or near the Palisades site and that, therefore, decommissioning would not affect any federally liste d aquatic species.

J. Fleming

Environmental Justice

In PSDAR Section 5.1.13, Environmental Justice, the licensee ex amined the geographic distribution of minority and low-income populations within a 50 -mile radius of Palisades using American Community Survey (ACS) 2014 - 2018, 5-year estim ates. Census block groups containing minority populations were identified and were concentrated in Covert township and Keeler Township in Van Buren County, the urban are as of Kalamazoo, Benton Harbor-Benton Heights-Fair Plain and South Bend-Mishawka -Elkhart, and in Berrian, Van Buren and Cass Counties. The licensee stated, the locations and population characteristics of minority and low-income populatio ns are similar to those evaluated by the NRC in the October 2006, Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants (NUREG-1437), Supplement 27, Regarding Palisades Nuclear Plant ( ML062710300).

The licensee stated that the site-specific decommissioning impa cts to all resource areas would be small. This indicates that the environmental effects of decommissioning activities at Palisades would not be detectable or would be so minor that they would neither destabilize nor noticeably alter any important attribut e of the environmental resource. In addition, the licensee concluded because no member of the public will be substantially affected, there can be no disproportionately hig h and adverse impacts on minority and low-income populations resulting from the decommis sioning of Palisades.

Based on its review, the NRC staff finds that the Palisades PSD AR, including the DCE, contains the information required by 10 CFR 50.82(a)(4)(i). As required by 10 CFR 50.82(a)(7), the licensee will notify the NRC in writing and send a copy to the State of Michigan before performing any decommissioning activity inconsistent with, or m aking any significant schedule change from, the planned decommissioning activities and schedul es described in the Palisades PSDAR, including changes that significantly increase the decomm issioning costs.

In accordance with NRC regulations, the licensee must verify th at the decommissioning activities meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.82(a)(6)(i) through 10 CFR 5 0.82(a)(6)(iii) or seek regulatory approval if needed. The NRC will continue to conduct inspections at Palisades throughout the decommissioning process in accordance with NRC I nspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 2561, Decommissioning Power Reactor Inspection Program, revised in January 2021 (ML20358A131), to ensure that decommissioning activities are performed safe ly and in compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations, and the conditions of the Palisades license.

In accordance with 10 CFR Part 2 of the Agency Rules of Practi ce and Procedure, a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records component of NRCs ADAMS. ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.

J. Fleming

If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1387 or by e-mail at Tanya.Hood@nrc.gov.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Tanya E. Hood, Project Manager Reactor Decommissioning Branch Division of Decommissioning, Uranium Recovery, and Waste Programs Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards

Docket No. 50-255

Enclosure:

Palisades PSDAR Comment Resolution

cc: Listserv

PKG: ML23087A035 LTR: ML23087A036 ENCLOSURE: ML23087A039 *via eConcurrence OFFICE NMSS/DUWP/RDB/PM NMSS/DUWP/RDB/PM NMSS/REFS/FAB/BC NAME *THood *MDoell *FMiller DATE 03/17/2023 04/05/2023 04/07/2023 OFFICE NMSS/REFS/ELRB/BC NMSS/DUWP/RDB/BC OGC - NLO NAME *TSmith *SAnderson CKreuzberger DATE 04/06/2023 04/17/2023 05/02/2023 OFFICE DORL/LPL1/PM NAME *THood DATE 05/02/2023