ML22136A064

Form ES-201-2

ML22136A064
Person / Time
Site:	Point Beach
Issue date:	03/19/2019
From:	Randy Baker NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:	Florida Power & Light Energy Point Beach
Baker R
Shared Package
ML17215A928	List: ML22136A064 ML22136A069 ML22136A073 ML22136A075 ML22136A079 ML22136A081 ML22136A095
References
Download: ML22136A064 (2)

Text

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 NOTE: This ES-201-2 is for the NRC developed Written Examination Outline sent to the Facility ONLY Facility: Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Date of Examination: July 15-26, 2019 Initials Item Task Description a b* c#

1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401N. ~~ NIA '

~

w b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with II NIA R

I Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled. ~ I~

~

T T

C. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. NIA ~

E d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate. NIA N

~ V

a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major s

M u

L I '

transients.

b ~ e c thorn arn ,oo,gh sceoacio sets (arnl spa,~) to test the projected o,mbe, aod m1 f applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule withe compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested u s i o /

vv /

A least one ew or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T applicants' dit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

0

c. To the ,~eot ' . ~ whethec th* o,tlioe(s) conro~s with t h , ~

R quantitative criteria s cified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D in Section D.5, "Specific I ructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,"' of ES- 1 (including overlap).

3. a. Verify that the systems walkthro outline meets the criteria speci don Form ES-301-2:

(1 ) The outline(s) contains the req

• ed number of control roo nd in-plant tasks distributed w among the safety functions as sp *fled on the form .

A (2) Task repetition from the last two NRG aminations is hin the limits specified on the form.

L (3) No tasks are duplicated from the applica 's audi st(s).

K (4) The number of new or modified tasks meets o s the minimums specified on the form.

£ath*

T (5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, e ency, and radiologically controlled area H tasks meets the criteria on the form.

R 0 b. V"ify that the admioistratise crite<ia s p : ~ ES-301-1 u (1 ) The tasks are distributed amon e topics as specified on e form.

G (2) At least one task is new ors* nificantly modified.

H (3) No more than one task is pealed from the last two NRG licens1 examinations.

C. Determine whether t ~ = enough different outlines to test the projecte~er and mix of applicants and ensur at no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

4. a. Assess whe~~t-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment an~dual plant examin 10n insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.

G

b. Assess/4ether the 10 CFR 55.41 , 5.5.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

E N

C. E ~ that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

E R check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams. I"-.

IY e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

Printed ~ l u r e ~

"' ' ~

hate

a. Author Greaorv Roach / . A*

" -i rlectx

b. Facility Reviewer (*) N/A ( _\ N/A

'tY....::....

!ff$

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) Randal D. Baker I c::'.".. \. 0 ~ -

d. NRC Supervisor Robert J. Orlikowski I J. A~~L

, ~

• Not applicable for NRG-prepared examination outlines .

1. The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required.

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Point Beach Date of Examination: 07/15/2019.

Item Initials Task Description

1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N.

w b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with R Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.

I T c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

T E d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are -appropriate.

N

2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major s transients.

I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at A least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

0

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outli.ne(s) conforms with the qualitative and R

quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in Section D.5, "Specific Instructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,"' of ES-301 (including overlap).

3. a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w among the safety functions as specified on the form.

A (2) Task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form.

L (3) No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s).

K (4) The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.

T (5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area H tasks meets the criteria on the form.

• R 0 b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

u (1) The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form .

G (2) At least one task is new or significantly modified.

H (3) No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing *examinations.

c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examination insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.

G E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

N

c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

E R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exa A

L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

Printed Na

a. Author Jeffre A. Hinze

b. Facility Reviewer(*) Joe Krear

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Supervisor

• Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.

1. The independent NRG reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required.