RBG-44741, Annual Non-Radiological Environ Operating Rept for 970829-980828. with
| ML20196D784 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | River Bend  |
| Issue date: | 08/28/1998 |
| From: | King R, Stoma S ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| RBF1-98-0296, RBF1-98-296, RBG-44741, NUDOCS 9812020325 | |
| Download: ML20196D784 (22) | |
Text
- __ . _ .. -. . . .-.
Entirgy Oper1 tion:3, Inc.
River Bend Station
, , 5485 U. S. Highway 61 PO. Box 220 eE' ntergy
- =rv"8 Fax 504 635 6068
. Rick J. King Director Nuclear Safety & Requiatory Aff airs November 25,1998 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk, OPI-37 Washington, D.C. 20555
Subject:
Environmental Operating Report
Reference:
Docket No. 50-458 File Nos. G9.5, G9.25.1.5 RBF1-98-0296 RBG-44741 Enclosed is the Annual Environmental Operating Report (Nonradiological) for the period August 29,1997, to August 28,1998. This report is submitted in accordance with Subsection 5.4.1 of Appendix B (Environmental Protection Plan) to River Bend Station License Number NPF-47.
If there are any questions, please contact Mr. Keith Stoma at (225*) 381-4784.
Sincerely,
/ .
O p eg y
RJK/WJF enclosure fy 1
1
- Note: The River Bend area code is in the process of being changed from 504 to 225. !
9812020325 980828 II PDR ADOCK 05000458!J R PDR g 030045
. . . ..~ -.-. - _ . - . - .. - - . . - . .
I. -e s-
- l. '
Environmental Operating Report 50-458 L- November 25,1998
!. ' RBG-44741 .
l RBF1-98-0296 ;
Page.2 of 2
]
l' l- cc: = U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, TX. 76011 NRC Resident Inspector- .
P.O. Box 1050
.. St. Francisville, LA 70775~ '
i r
)
]
l l
1 l
i 4
I
(-
l
RIVER BEND STATION ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT FOR 1997/1998 August 29,1997 - August 28,1998 Prepared 1,y:
/7 S. K3ha AXh Environmental Specialist - Sr. Lead Reviewed By:
swA / c NLep>ue J P. W. Chapman /
Supt. Chemistry /RadwasteEnvironmental Approved By:
Lil G W f a Dwight C. Mims General Manager Plant Operations
ei RIVER BEND STATION ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT FOR 1997/1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
/ OBJECTIVES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I t 2.0 ENVI RONMENTAL PROTECTION ISSU ES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2.1 Aquati c I ssues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2.2 Tenestrial Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2.3 Noise Is sues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3.0 CONSISTENCY REQUIREM ENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3.1 Plant Design and Operation . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. 2 3.2 Reporting Related to the NPDES Permit and State Certification ....... . 3 3.3 Changes Reafi red for Compliance with Other Environmental Regul ati ons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 4.1 Unusual or important Environmental Events ... ... ... ... ... ... ... . .... ... . . 4 4.2 Environmental Monitoring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 4.2.1 Aquatic Monitoring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . 4 42.2 Terrestrial Monitoring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 4 4.2.3 Noise Monitoring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 5.0 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 5.1 Revi ew and Audit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 5 5.2 Records Ret ention . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 g 5.3 Changes in Environmental Protection Plan . .. .. . ... . . ... .. . . ... ... ... ..... 6 5.4 Plant Reporting Requirem ents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 5.4.1 Routine Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 5.4.2 Non-routine Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
L RIVER BEND STATION {
ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT FOR 1997/1998 ,
LIST OF TABLES & ENCLOSURES [
r Table 1 Non-routine Repons to Federal and State Environmental i
- =1 Regulatory Agencies ,
i Enclosure 1 Photointerpretation Report: A Brief Aerial Photography Analysis of River Bend Station at St. Francisville, LA: 1997-1998 i
t i I 1
l l
l t
3
l RIVER BEND STATION l ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT FOR 1997/1998 !
1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
/ OBJECTIVES 1
The Annual Environmental Operating Report for the period of August 29,1997 (anniversary of i license issuance) through August 28,1998, is submitted in accordance with Subsection 5.4.1 of Appendix B to River Bend Station Facility Operating License Number NPF-47.
River Bend Station (RBS) consists of a 936 MWE Genaal Electric boiling water reactor located on a 3,342 acre site in West Feliciana Parish, Louisiana,4.1 km (2.5 MI) southeast of St.
Francisville. Waste heat from RBS is dissipated via systems using five mechanical draft cooling towers which draw makeup wster from the Mississippi River,3.3 (air) km (2.0 MI) to the southwest. Blowdown from the normal cooling tower system is discharged to the Mississippi River through a submerged pipe about 200 meters (660 ft) downstream from the makeup water intake.
Appendix B to the RBS operating license is the Environmental Protection Plan (Non-radiological), or EPP, which has the following principal objectives:
- 1. To verify that the facility is operated in an environmentally acceptable manner, as established in the Final Environmental Statement Related to the Operation of River Bend Station (NUREG-1073, commonly referred to as the FES-OL) and other Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) impact assessments.
\
l
- 2. To coordinate NRC requirements and maintain consistency with other Federal, i State, and local requimnents for environmental protection.
- 3. To keep the NRC informed of the environmental effects of facility construction and operation and of actions taken to control these effects. l l
2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ISSUES ]
l in the FES-OL dated January 1985, the NRC staff considered the environmental impacts !
l associated with the operation of River Bend Station Unit 1. Certain environmental issues were identified which required study or license conditions to resolve environmental concems and to assure adequate protection of the environment.
i 1
l l
RIVER BEND STATION !
ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT FOR 1997/1998 l l
1 2.1 Aquatic Issues l l
i There were no specific aquatic issues identified by the NRC staffin the FES-OL. l Environmental concerns, which relate to water quality, are regulated by way of the l facility's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Pennit and Louisiana Water Discharge Permit. I l
2.2 Terrestrial Issues l
)
Salt drift deposition from the normal cooling towers may cause changes in, or damage to, nearby vegetation on RBS property (FES-OL Section 5.5.1). A monitoring program to .
identify the extent ofimpacts and the actions necessary to mitigate, if any, is specified in EPP Section 4.2.2.
2.3 Noise Issues Operation of the nonnal cooling towers, the service water cooling tower and main r,tation transformers at RBS may increase noise levels at nearby residences (FES-OL Section 5.12). A monitoring program to identify the extent ofimpacts and the actions necessary to mitigate, if any, is specified in EPP Section 4.2.3.
3.0 CONSISTENCY REQUIREMENTS 3.1 Plant Design and Operation In accordance with the EPP, RBS personnel prepare and record an environmental evaluation of any proposed change in plant design or operation or performance of any test or experiment which may significantly affect the environment. Such evaluations are not performed on activities which do not affect the environment or are required for ;
compliance with non-NRC environmental regulations. The environmental evaluation process is administered through programs governing design modification and the i development / revision of written procedures. Before engaging in additional construction or operational activities which may significantly affect the environment, a determination !
is made and recorded as to whether any proposed change involves an unreviewed environmental question determination (UEQD). A proposed activity involves a UEQD if it concerns:
2 I
RIVER BEND STATION ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT FOR 1997/1998 a) a matter which may result in a significant increase in any adverse environmental impact previously evaluated in the FES-OL, environmental impact appraisals, or any decisions of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board; b) a significant change in effluent or power levels; or c) a matter, not previously reviewed and evaluated in the documents specified in (a) above, which may have a significant adverse environmental impact.
f If the activity meets any of these criteria it must either not be performed as proposed or a written evaluation must be prepared and submitted for prior NRC approval.
During the reponing period covered by this repon no changes at RBS were determined to involve unreviewed environmental questions. Records of environmental determinations are maintained in the station Permanent Plant File as part of documentation associated -
with the modification request program and/or the procedure development system.
3.2 Reporting Related to the NPDES Permit and State Cenification Violations of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and the Louisiana Water Discharge Permit System (LWDPS) permits have been reported to the NRC via copies of non-routine repons sent to the other agencies pursuant to the requirements of the permits (see Table 1). j On January 27,1992 a renewal application for LWDPS Permit No.WP0409 was submitted to the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) and on September 14,1995 a renewal application for NPDES Permit No. LA0042731 was submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). On August 27,1996 the LDEQ received approval from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to assume the NPDES. It is expected that LDEQ will issue a Louis +.la Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (LPDES) permit in the near future which wih replace the existing ,
state and federal pemiits. Subsequently, the station has submitted to LDEQ five letters that contain supplemental information and operational change requests. River Bend Station continues to comply with the terms and conditions of the present LWDPS and NPDES pennits which we e to expire on May 28,1992 and March 15,1996 respectively. I 3
1 l
RIVER BEND STATION ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT FOR 1997/1998 l
On September 30,1997 an NPDES Compliance Sampling Inspection was conducted at River Bend Station. All aspects of the inspection were found to be satisfactory.
3.3 Changes Required for Compliance with Other Environmental Regulations l
During the period covered by this report there were no changes in plant design or I operation or the performance of tests or experiments required to achieve con phance with i non-NRC environmental regulations at River Bend Station.
i 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS l
4.1 Unusual or Important Environmental Events !
l During the period covered by this report there were no unusual or important events, l causally related to RBS operation, which resulted in significant environmental impacts.
4.2 Environmental Monitoring :
4.2.1 Aquatic Monitoring Water quality monitoring was performed in accordance with the requirements established in the station's NPDES and Louisiana Water Discharge permits.
Results were documented in monthly Discharge Monitoring Reports and non-
)
routine reports (Table 1), as required, and submitted to the USEPA and LDEQ. i l
4.2.2 Terrestrial Monitoring Subsection 4.2.2 of the EPP requires aerial photography beginning two years prior to cooling tower operation and during the following first and third years of j operation. This requirement was completed in 1989 when the " third year" set of l stereo color infrared transparencies were monitored. During this oorting period l River Bend Station performed terrestrial monitoring with aerial photography, and expanded this monitoring to address a licensing commitment to monitor for and report the existence of new oil and gas wells and pipelines within 2 miles of the plant. No significant changes in vegetative communities or individual trees, attributable to salt drift impacts, was indicated in the immediate area surrounding the cooling towers. One area of construction is visible on the westem boundary of the plant site.
4 4
1 RIVER BEND STATION ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT FOR 1997/1998 This is the construction site for the new Hydrogen Water Chemistry tanks. No changes in the number or size of wellheads, pipelines or transmission line right-of-ways were identified within 2 miles of RBS. The photo in iretation report is provided as Enclosure 1.
4.2.3 Noise Monitoring i
The requirement to conduct an environmental noise monitoring program (EPP Subsection 4.2.3) was completed during 1986/87 and the results were included in the second annual Environmental Operating Repon. In general, the acoustic environment in the vicinity of RBS proved to be substantially more complex than anticipated, but neither the magnitude of increases attributable to plant operation nor community reaction exceeded FES-OL predictions.
5.0 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES 5.1 Review and Audit Entergy Operations, Inc. has provided for the independent review and audit of compliance with the EPP. The main group responsible for audits of EPP- related activities, the RBS Quality Assurance Department, reponed directly to the Manager-Quality Assurance during the period covered in this report. All findings identified dudng the reporting period were satisfactorily resolved and did not indicate a significant deterioration of the activities being audited.
5.2 Records Retention Records and logs relative to environmental aspects of plant operation and audit activities are retained in the RBS Permanent Plant File. These records and logs are available to the NRC on request. Records of modifications to station structures, systems, and components determined to potentially affect the continued protection of the environment will be retained for the life of the plant.
Other records, data, and logs relating to the EPP will be retained for five years or, where applicable, in accordance with the requirements of the USEPA and LDEQ.
5 s
l
.. = . - . - .- - - . . . .. _ - . _____
i l
RIVER BEND STATION ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT FOR 1997/1998 53 Changes in Environmental Protection Plan
]
There were no requests for changes to the EPP during the period covered by this l report.
l
! 5.4 Plant Reoorting Requirements !
J 5.4.1 Routine Reports l
This Annual Environmental Operating Report was prepared to meet the reporting I requirements of EPP Subsection 5.4.1 for the period from August 29,1997, .
through August 28,1998. Summaries and analyses of the results of monitoring l programs, including comparisons with related pre-operational studies, operational i controls, and previous reports are pmsented in Section 4.2 above. During the i
period of this report there were no indications of significant harmful e.Tects or evidence of trends toward irreveisible damage to the environment causally related i
to the operation of River Bend Station.
5.4.2 Non-routine Reports All non-routine events from August 29,1997, through August 28,1998, that were reportable were identified to other federal, state, or local agencies in accordance with their reporting requirements in lieu of requirements of EPP Subsection 5.4.2 (see Table 1).
i b
d 6
k
ENCLOSURE 1 PHOTOINTERPRETATION REPORT (AERO-DATA CORPORATION 98-3527.01)
A BRIEF AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY ANALYSIS OF RIVER BEND STATION AT ST. FRANCISVILLE, LOUISIANA:
1997-1998 By:
Aero-Data Corporation 9213 Interline Avenue Baton Rouge, LA 70809-1908 Phone: (225) 927-5725 Submitted to:
Entergy Services, Inc.
River Bend Station P.O. Box 220 St. Francisville, LA 70775 November 1998 P1-lVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
1.1 METHODS AND MATERIALS 1
1.2
SUMMARY
OF PRELIMINARY FINDINGS l 1.3 OCTOBER 9,1998 - INTERPRETED IMAGES 1 l
1.4 SEPTEMBER 29,1997 - INTERPRETED IMAGES I 4
i l
F 3
-n
4 1.0 Executive Summary Aero-Data Corporation (ADC) has contracted with Entergy to conduct a photo mission covering a three-mile radius around the facility near St. Francisville, !
Louisiana. ADC has been providing annual plant site documentation of the facility since 1985.
This year ADC produced a photointerpretation report and a photomosaic of the facility. The current photography was compared to the previous year's photography in order to identify any changes in the number of wellheads and/or pipelines surrounding the site. Changes in vegetation within the facility boundary were also identified.
The deliverables for this project include contact prints of each frame (24), a color plot showing the 1997-1998 changes, a color plot containing the frame centers for each of the photographs from the current flight, and this interpretation report.
1.1 Methods and Materials The current photo mission was flown on October 9,1998 at a scale of 1"=1,500' using false color infrared (CIR) film. The frame centers of the 1998 photographic .
coverage are identical to those flown by ADC in 1997. ADC's flight planning was simplified with the use of a Geographic information System (GIS) software package which aided in the alignment of the flight lines. Using this system, three flightlines were selected and 24 frames of film were shot for this photo mission. Navigstion ,
was conducted using GPS and moving map equipment. l The change map of the River Bend facility was produced using Digital l Photogrammetric Workstations in combination with a Geographic information i System. Each frame of film was scanned at a high resolution and referenced three- l dimensionally to the Louisiana State Plane Coordinate System. The GIS incorporated digital orthophotomosaics of the 1997 and 1998 photo missions as well as digitized vector data. Comparison of the current photography with the 1997 photography by rigorous three-dimensional photointerpretation revealed no new changes regarding pipelines or wellheads. No significant ground vegetation removal was detected.
i 1.2 Summary of Preliminary Findings No crianges in the number or size of wellheads, pipelines or transmission line right-of-ways were identified during the interpretive phase of this project. There are no significant changes in vegetation in the area immediately surrounding the cooling towers. An area of construction is visible on the western boundary of the plant site.
Aside from this construction, the area surrounding the Entergy River Bend facility has not changed significantly since the 1997 photomission.
4 1
i i
i I
l
1.3 October 9,1998 -Interpreted Images O
r s
Entergy River Bend l Aerial Photographic Analysis !
October 9,1998
- g. ., . .
.n. ..
-;.cc .
.? !;L /
t . ,9 _ g.-gsgf. n . ....,y-1 ,- .
a.
a ,f g- . . . *
- p
. . . .v., c . .ds
,.m ' '
' k,, .f ' } .
h, sk [, '[
y
,,,~.
. j -
w .
.. e. .
- p .y ' .7 s - <
. %g5 F" ' -
A,/4 ; ' ; .
'^*
w
, 4- .: _
. o .
j'
- , w, , ,
.- ~ . v ,
)}
;f
, ,,- .y ,
+.
. I. .
\
=T -
< f * -
~
Q . gp ; g.y. r ~ . j % r.
<,t .,
!, g -
*) -
abr s i e , / '/ l , l,A ," 'I y . [
- M '. ;.; . . .
z.m y .. - ,n- .$ -
>~: \
in J -
. 6
' , ?[dd$ ,b
.cna ')..:. ;
.g. .n
w :, aq \
4 , s ~ (' gig - {.;}.,: y . ., ,, , , 4 (
* .,l T ~i, ( - AL.. ,. ..
j 7 , y%('% Rj):-
.pi. a . .-..
jj 4 a-gg , Ys e (p a ry, . , .. .
.y x,
^ - ' .
\ j ,
p,fg:g l.:4 g.
. o s .. ,
a
>v
~ er ; -) 7 .
. ,, t_ ,
6 e
-m y + .. . .
, ') .f[)), , *y
%y@ _ -
y . 4 ,k,- .
~~eN ,' -
},J ', * ,
_. . q
.._ . , S.
- 9. I
.h '..g
.., i-l i
, N... ., .eg ry'
^
if y L x\ j . u., v.. ..: < - J _
, : , v, . , .n
- 1 *q'
.f. 4.
't 9
, Entergy River Bend Aerial Photographic AnalysS
^
October 9,1998 I 1 :- um.d Vayamu.ne Distwbeams g Newly Comarecend PeeJ Under " Comarmaios gap.a.d veysmion N 4 %eiter came 6]
's 3
. Pond
') %
p ,g f Co_ } .--
\ .- ,.
\
~
^
[ e - . Paciltry Under 3 9. , . .g3 , 4 Commussies %
\ g.g
~ $
' 22
.t e%
; i I * ,
k tre.i I
~ws .
'(
l p' M maPPang esapiled umag 4ptalpt. . tamed
~ - , , . <
==rks.u n mesy w is. w Emronments
-air . ' aced se the Imissen. Same i. I I 8'" 4h4 E V8P'E'8 Sam'end Remote Sensmg CormAng Sermens Plese,e - Syneen SouthZems NAD27). 'N M i , , M Assupumul Asse ; 22S 927.5725 N Whum i A.:-'- . Payssy tammhry . :
No ed are aussouy involves papelines er welbedi ess8'" %% J$;' ' s v "i W '"
'h 1 _. . _ e Hios Fees we dserwd dwaa this penal 1 E .WhtNamiesey - 2 _ r
l' Entergy River Bend Aerial Photographic Analysis October 9,1998 l
,, : .+
m , ym.cr ;
- I p- '4
.. . .I ,',f , y -
n;.., .; - _ - i.
- .y i.,
p . pripl s.
- 3;,'yg ~
y;n^ i .
-,- ~. .
n s~ , . . y .43 ' ~ *' Q(R
;..[j _
,7 c4 g,. *
.; y v,
- s. - .1
~
- ' ,E h . .,1 *4 -
e2 j ,,
' ,:~
%y. ,
I ,.
%y.<4 ,
q ' 3 e. 8 L: , i g [k^4 n I e *
/
l 4 , 3. s. k . g
' afF ' gr '
% .k -' '
.l g -
d h , ' E m. em O
%,z
's en .
g ~~ ,y. s s J '
)
s
--s ,
_# , e i 'g . 4 8@ s i J
\ .
4
< a;.(
g . _ D J* 8
. . . , ;o ,-
' l, .
)
^;
i
}: % q , N.)
s - ,- ., < !' -3 .g 4
$ .$ s
- w. sq w~., r _
1 s. % s. t
,4 s g , ,
g
'y29 Q %, t_
- inNei .
-! ,,- I * %/ M
'a y
p 7 .. 3p..-------
' ?
?4 ;
, i.,f i '
A, ' ,: e)i 3 3d.? ., s:[,4 I $ -
. 4 s ,, p
~ + v - ,, -
, .a .c f e 1.r. .,.u' r
- ~
; .- .: . .. t .
sp \ (e k 4 [- n4 . ay%
;. 'fA s / ,s '
g ..
; I n g
4Y '. , [ ,s , y o 4; % . _spe,-
"'t ' .4.=r . g . . (, ,
#~' '
g* en , e i d* l.k ;Ybj s e 4 y.-q, I.
\* ::1, ,A S m.o . . ., _ s__- .
. qs}G- n _ s 2 .; . .
i __
, f.amg krwsere QQ} \ gmw.n Rawom
._. 4 3;qq e,----
j - , , , , , r. ,. , n, . so Approa sisk pgj,
! a _ _.**'"f*"'__ -
1.4 September 29,1997 - Interpreted images A l l i i I i
Entergy River Bend I Aerial Photographic Analysis l 1 September 29,1997 l i i
.a.
~ .. ..
,a
.s ,i D l * -
e_ g o, ,p y {. l h,
. (f'p -
l 1 s, ! P4' ' .,1 1( i :.
.'t.
g 13 a i ! g ,, q ^ f 1 8 y.
; r.
- i. $la
- w j. ,-
t Nj f h h.. 3 I$n Qpn
'IM i, t iig e;u
< sy4q v4' Zup* ' %1l 3
- .\ ,
)
~
x '['
~. -
muqs ..
. g .,
,$ .. '2
>,.,..m;., .a v . .,,- ,.m m ..
"'"""'J ' J #~'
-,n_"e e o p r e.:w a. f ee m na a 4 ,
..m..,, ,,..,,.,...,,,,,,...,,n o s-nM i e .r. n 4
, . Entergy River Bend Aerial Photographic Analys'a September 29,1997 3'
i 4 Waitor
*67 s
4
- a 4, ,
i New s pukingLos & t t h 4
'l I b
1 9. . gg, ; (. . t a e
~*._,2 Si ion F was
'.3,
\*4* -
A, . I Eresional -* Femens ,
% e
, r4 e
.- g____._;
g - Theing w..d.inay enhapkaramanau seenferessed a che f.euniana suu
- I I Esenegassmuse ^;.e; g'[Qw ( -e '+ 7temote Sosseg CamdtMg Sarwcas
$$5) . L'- M ' Reuspuesd esses ,;;l 22s 827.5725 Planer - 5 yuan + 5ewh 2eme (NAD 2P). /* M .b2 .,
,N. *sur ,.t. asumeny'~
sammsm8'8 % <3ssy':... ;[':t- . .A-' 18 #
- inoo F e No adveres scuouy invol,ang papeliese er m - :. g :.wanesmy .; ' Ws ; .4.:
c.-_ - . . _ _ . _ _ we nJ4. e p.n g. .
~.__._ __ _ _ ___ . _ _ . . ___ .
Entergy River Bend Aerial Photographic Analysis September 29,1997 4 . . ~ s[ , . .- . .
~ g?f* ~- .
9 $ 69 l
,,, I
.'. .-p {r '4 h q. .l
&- ,j.
- m. Q
,' c' 1
h, - v+ , re s.x 3 : '. s, ,s . g,g ..
,, 7, -
- f. ,h .. N^ 6 R ; @y yQ"g, 3 1.pp, ;; .
2 $, .. _
;. ; p . ; s.ny y -
S-~
- v. . .. , ~ , .
,h l ' 'l :.,
Q _
- 1. ,4: .. .. -
1 i e ,% ' 9, , . .
, M~. s . , 2, .m
*r , ,
.\ ,
&ns'~- 'e1t
. pe Q.-{; q. . g . - .d
- y. %,g ;.
g;s . .
< c; a >
Y
.Y
= ~ ~ ~
,.s y *,.
z . e
, 1 y 1
,y & ,5
- . 5' M , .
j gf' ( { .
,7
- g.) ._ i ( .
J K Il , g" \ g
- : .m , , .
c i t,
- n s----- F i
- K, W3 -
N 6# O f.' " . l . ,,
.V'.'~' s'i%' '
l ,
. p g, .
_r* % gy $ , ]$ .f ' rf. .. . ,' ; Q;f %A%; ' i - e sN
.+
x, . q5 '
' *
- 5-
- o. , ,g.. u.Qr. ,- 7
~,)# 4, hh ",N 'n c . . ,. ,
[ ..T-) A ' "
+. i' .. .
) $$ : ;
p s- , p# s,, 4 + . _ . Qg. . 3 c.
., c.Jg s 3 3, ,
( %- c.",, ~ 's T ,e ," h g 1, , S 3 , eh W_i l
- ~..
(T- - . i .;. g-u* l'
. .. w w + , .
g ', ~ f k& $$fQwl(
~
i ..
%. m., m. mm ,, u.s.-
r--
-a q,{ '+
i
,. ~.
m g u , , ,,.m
~ ._ . . . , _
esssss888"" P peb Ganay *
' " o.
,-',,[' a v,: Hw w I
. _ _ . - . , . - , -}}