ML20203J078

From kanterella
Revision as of 11:00, 7 December 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Proposed Tech Specs,Changing Pump Testing Surveillance Requirements to Reflect STS Requirements
ML20203J078
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 07/28/1986
From:
DUQUESNE LIGHT CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20203J046 List:
References
NUDOCS 8608050175
Download: ML20203J078 (20)


Text

'

ATTACHMENT A 4 Revise the Technical Specifications as follows:

Remove Pages Insert Pages 3/4 1-11 3/4 1-11 3/4 1-12 3/4 1-12 3/4 1-13 3/4 1-13 3/4 1-14 3/4 1-14 3/4 5-4 3/4 5-4 3/4 5-5 3/4 5-5 3/4 6-11 3/4 6-11 3/4 6-12 3/4 6-12 3/4 6-13 3/4 6-13 3/4 6-14 3/4 6-14 3/4 6-15 3/4 6-15 3/4 7-5 3/4 7-5 3/4 7-6 3/4 7-6 3/4 7-12 3/4 7-12 3/4 7-13 3/4 7-13 i

8608050175 860728 PDR ADOCK 05000334 P PDR

REACTIVITY CONTROL SYSTEMS CHARGING PUMP - SHUTDOWN LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.1.2.3 One charging pump in the boron injection flow path required by Specification (3.1.2.1) or Low Head Safety Injection Pump (with an open reactor coolant system vent of greater than or equal to 3.14 square inches) shall be OPERABLE and capable of being powered from an OPERABLE bus.

APPLICABILITY: MODES 5 and 6.

ACTION:

With none of the charging pumps OPERABLE , suspend all operations involving CORE ALTERATIONS or positive reactivity changes until one charging pump or Low Head Safety Injection pump is restored to OPERABLE status.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS , 4.1.2.3.1 The above required charging pump shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by verifying, on recirculation flow, that the pump develops a discharge pressure greater than or equal to 2402 psig when tested pursuant to Specification 4.0.5.

4.1.2.3.2 All charging pumps, except the above required charging pump, shall be demonstrated inoperable at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> by verifying that the. control switches are placed in the PULL-TO-LOCK position and tagged.

4.1.2.3.3 When the Lcw Head Safety Injection pump is used in lieu of a charging oump, the Low Head Safety Injection pump shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by:

a. Verification of an operable RWST pursuant to 4.1.2.7, b; Verification of an operable Lcw Head Safety Injection Pump pursuant to Specification 4.5.2.b.2,
c. Verification of power available* to MOV-ISI-890C with the plug inserted-in its control circuit and an operable Low Head Safety Injection flow path from the RWST to the Reactor Coolant System once per shift, and
d. Verification that the vent is open at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />.**
  • Emergency backup power need not be available
    • Except when the vent path is provided with a valve which is locked or provided with remote position indication, or sealed, or otherwise secured in the open position, then verify these valves open at least once per 7 days.

BEAVER VALLEY - UNIT 1 3/4 1-11 PROPOSED WORDING

REACTIVITY CONTROL SYSTEMS CHARGING PUMPS - OPERATING LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.1.2.4 At least two charging pumps shall be OPERABLE.

APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4*

ACTION:

With only one charging pump OPERABLE, restore at least two charging pumps to OPERABLE status within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> or be in at least HOT STANDBY and borated to a SHUTDOWN MARGIN equavalent to at least 1% Ak/k at 200 F within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />; restore at least two charging pumps to OPERABLE status within the next 7 days or be in COLD SHUTDOWN within the next 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.1.2.4.1 At least two charging pumps shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by verifying, on recirculation flow, that each pump develops a discharge pressure greater than or equal to 2402 psig when tested pursuant to Specification 4.0.5.

4.1.2.4.2 All charging pumps, except the above required OPERABLE pump, shall be demonstrated inoperable at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> whenever the temperature of one or more of the inservice RCS cold legs is s 275*F by verifying that the control switches are placed in the PULL-TO-LOCK position and tagged.

  • A maximum of one centrifugal charging pump shall be OPERABLE whenever the i temperature of one or more of the RCS legs is s 275 F. .

i BEAVER VALLEY - UNIT 1 3/4 1-12 PROPOSED WORDING l

REACTIVITY CONTROL SYSTEMS BORIC ACID TRANSFER PUMPS - SHUTDOWN LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.1.2.5 One boric acid transfer pump shall be OPERABLE and capable of being powered from an OPERABLE emergency bus if only the flow path thru the boric acid transfer pump of Specification 3.1.2.la, is OPERABLE.

APPLICABILITY: MODES 5 and 6.

ACTION:

With no boric acid transfer pump OPERABLE as required to complete the flow path of Specification 3.1.2.la, suspend all operations involving CORE ALTERATICNS or positive reactivity changes until at least one boric acid transfer pump is restored to OPERABLE status.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.1.2.5 The above required boric acid transfer pump shall be demonstrated OPERABLE, on recirculation flow, by verifying that the pump develops a discharge pressure greater than or equal to 107 psig when tested pursuant to Specification 4.0.5.

BEAVER VALLEY - UNIT 1 3/4 1-13 PROPOSED WORDING

~

REACTIVITY CONTROL SYSTEMS BORIC ACID TRANSFER PUMPS - OPERATING LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.1.2.6 At least one boric acid transfer pump in the boron injection flow path required by Specification 3.1.2.2a shall be OPERABLE and capable of being powered from an OPERABLE emergency bus if the flow path through the boric acid pump in Specification 3.1.2.2a is OPERABLE.

APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, 3 and 4.

ACTION:

With no boric acid transfer pump OPERABLE, restore at least one boric acid transfer pump to OPERABLE STATUS within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> or be in at least HOT STANDBY within tho next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and borated to a SHUTDOWN MARGIN equivalent to 1% Ak/k at 200 F; restore at least one boric acid transfer pump to OPERABLE status within the next 7 days or be in COLD SHUTDOWN within the next 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.1.2.6 The above required boric acid transfer pump shall be demonstrated OPERABLE, on recirculation flow, by verifying that the pump develops a discharge pressure greater than or equal to 107 psig when tested pursuant to Specification 4.0.5.

BEAVER VALLEY - UNIT 1 3/4 1-14 PROPOSED WORDING

EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEMS SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.5.2 Each ECCS subsystem shall be demonstrated OPERABLE:

a. At least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> by verifying that the following valves are in the indicated positions with power to the valve operator control circuits disconnected by removal of the plug in the lock out circuit from each circuit:

Valve Number Valve Function Valve Position MOV SI 890 A LHSI to hot leg CLOSED MOV SI 890 B LHSI to hot leg CLOSED MOV SI 890 C LHSI to cold leg OPEN MOV SI 869 A Ch Pmp to hot leg CLOSED MOV SI 869 B Ch Pmp to hot leg CLOSED

b. By verifying that each of the following pumps develops the required discharge pressure on recirculation flow when tested pursuant to Specification 4.0.5:
1) Centrifugal charging pump 22402 psig,
2) Low head safety injection pump 2 159 psig I

i i

i

(

BEAVER VALLEY - UNIT 1 3/4 5-4 PROPOSED WORDING l

EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEMS SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

c. At least once per 31 days by:
1. Verifying that each valve (manual, power operated'or automatic) in the flow path that is not locked, sealed, or otherwise secured in position, is in its correct position.
2. Verifying that each ECCS subsystem is aligned to receive electrical power from separate OPERABLE emergency buses.
d. By visual inspection which verifies that no loose debris (rags, trash, l clothing, etc) is present in the containment which could be transported to the containment sump and cause restriction of the pump suctions during LOCA conditions. This visual inspection shall be performed:
1. For all accessible areas of the containment prior to establishing containment integrity, and
2. Of the areas affected within containment at the completion of each containment entry when containment integrity is established.
e. At least once per 18 months by:
1. A visual inspection of the containment sump and verifying that the subsystem suction inlets are not restricted by debris and that the sump components (trash racks, screens, etc.) show no evidence of structural distress or corrosion.
f. At least once per 18 months, during shutdown, by: l l

[ 1. Cycling each power operated (excluding automatic) valve in the flow path that is not testable during plant operation, through at least one complete cycle of full travel.

2. Verifying that each automatic valve in the flow path actuates to its correct position on a safety injection signal.
3. Verifying that the centrifugal charging pump and low head safety injection pumps start automatically upon receipt of a safety injection signal.

t l

BEAVER VALLEY - UNIT 1 3/4 5-5 PROPOSED WORDING

C0_NTAINMENT SYSTEMS 3/4.6.2 DEPRESSURIZATION AND COOLING SYSTEMS CONTAINMENT QUENCH SPRAY SYSTEM LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.6.2.1 Two separate and independent containment quench spray subsystems shall be CPERABLE.

APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, 3 and 4.

ACTION:

With one containment quench spray subsystem inoperable, restore the inoperable subsystem to OPERABLE status within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.6.2.1 Each containment quench spray subsystem shall be demonstrated OPERABLE;

a. At least once per 31 days by:
1. Veri fying that each valve (manual, power-operated, or automatic) in the flow path not locked, sealed, or otherwise secured in position, is in its correct position; and
2. Veri fying the temperature of the borated water in the refueling water storage tank is within the limits shown on Figure 3.6-1.
b. At least once per 31 days on a STAGGERED TEST BASIS, by verifying, that on a recirculation flow, each pump develops a discharge pressure of greater than or equal to 153 psig at a flow of 21550 gpm when tested pursuant to Specification 4.0.5.

BEAVER VALLEY - UNIT 1 3/4 6-11 PROPOSED WORDING

CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (Continued)

c. At least once per 18 months during shutdown, by: l
1. Cycling each power operated (excluding automatic) valve in the flow path that is not testable during plant operation, through at least one complete cycle of full travel.
2. Veri fying that each automatic valve in the flow path actuates to its correct position on a test signal.
3. Verifying that each spray pump starts automatically on a test' signal.
d. At least once per 5 years by performing an air or smoke flow test l through each spray header and verifying each spray nozzle is unobstructed.

?

BEAVER VALLEY - UNIT 1 3/4 6-12 PROPOSED WORDING

4 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS CONTAINMENT RECIRCULATION SPRAY SYSTEM LIMITING' CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.6.2.2 Four separate and independent containment recirculation spray subsystems, each composed of a spray pump, associated heat exchanger and flow path shall be OPERABLE.

APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, 3 and 4.

ACTION:

With one containment recirculation spray subsystem inoperable, restore the inoperable subsystem to OPERABLE status within 7 days or be in HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />; restore the inoperable spray system to OPERABLE status within the next 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> or be in COLD SHUTDOWN within the next 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.6.2.2 Each containment recirculation spray subsystem shall be demonstrated OPERABLE:

a. At least once per 31 days by verifying that each accessible valve (manual, power-operated, or automatic) in the flow path not locked, sealed or otherwise secured in position, is in its correct position;
b. When tested pursuant to Specification 4.0.5, manually start each recirculation spray pump and verify the pump shaft rotates;
c. At least once per 18 months by verifying that on a Containment l Pressure-High-High signal, the recirculation spray pumps start automatically as follows:

RS-P-1A and RS-P-2B 210 1 5 second delay RS-P-2A and RS-P-1B 225 i 5 second delay

d. At least once per 18 months during shutdown, veri fy that on recirculation flow, each pump develops a discharge pressure of greater than or equal to 115 psig at a flow of 2 2000 gpm when tested pursuant to Specification 4.0.5; BEAVER VALLEY - UNIT 1 3/4 6-13 PROPOSED WORDING

, . . . - - , , . , ~ . - . , . - , -- , - , - - - -- -

CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

e. At least once per 18 months during shutdown, by: l
1. Cycling each power operated (excluding automatic) valve in the flow path not testable during plant operation, through at least one complete cycle of full travel.
2. Verifying that each automatic valve in the flow path actuates to its correct position on a test signal.
3. Initiating flow through each River Water subsystem and its two associated recirculation spray heat exchangers, and verifying a flow rate of at least 8000 gpm.
f. At least once per 5 years by performing an air or smoke flow test I through each spray header and verifying each spray nozzle is unobstructed.

BEAVER VALLEY - UNIT 1 3/4 6-14 PROPOSED WORDING

CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS CHEMICAL ADDITION SYSTEM LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.6.2.3 The chemical addition system shall be OPERABLE with:

a. A chemical addition tank containing at least 4700 gallons of between 19.5 and 20 percent by weight NaOH solution, and
b. Four chemical injection pumps each capable of adding Na0H solution from the chemical addition tank to a containment quench spray system pump flow.

APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, 3 and 4.

ACTION:

With the chemical addition system inoperable, restore the system to OPERABLE status within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> or be in HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />; restore the chemical addition system to OPERABLE status within the next 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> or be in COLD SHUTDOWN within the next 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br />.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.6.2.3 The chemical addition system shall be demonstrated OPERABLE:

a. At least once per 31 days by verifying that each valve (manual, power-operated, or automatic) in the flow path that is not locked, sealed, or otherwise secured in position, is in its correct position.
b. By veri fying, that on recirculation flow, each pump develops a flow between 31 and 34 gpm when tested pursuant to Specification 4.0.5.

l t

l l

t BEAVER VALLEY - UNIT 1 3/4 6-15 PROPOSED WORDING

PLANT SYSTEMS AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.7.1.2 At least three steam generator auxiliary feedwater pumps and associated flow paths shall be OPERABLE with:

a. Two feedwater pumps, each capable of being powered from separate emergency busses, and
b. One feedwater pump capable of being powered from an OPERABLE steam supply system.

APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2 and 3.

ACTION:

a. With one auxiliary feedwater pump inoperable, restore at least three auxiliary feedwater pumps (two capable of being powered from separate emergency busses and one capable of being powered by an OPERABLE steam supply system) to OPERABLE status within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> or be in HOT SHUTDOWN within the next 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />.
b. With th motor driven auxiliary feedwater pump supplying the redundant header inoperable, realign the two remaining auxiliary feedwater pumps to separate headers within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.7.1.2 Each auxiliary feedwater pump shall be demonstrated OPERABLE:

a. When tested pursuant to Specification 4.0.5:
1. By verifying, that on recirculation flow the above required motor-driven pumps develop a discharge pressure greater than or equal to 1155 psig.
2. By verifying, that on recirculation flow the above required steam turbine driven pump develops a discharge pressure greater than or equal to 1155 psig when the secondary steam pressure is greater than 600 psig.

BEAVER VALLEY - UNIT 1 3/4 7-5 PROPOSED WORDING

I PLANT SYSTEMS SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (Continued)

b. At least once per 31 days by: l
1. Verifying that each valve (manual, power operated or automatic) in j the flow path that is not locked, sealed, or otherwise secured in position, is in its correct position.
2. Reverifying the requirements of Tech Spec. surveillance 1 4.7.1.2.a.5 by a second and independent operator.
3. Establish and maintain constant communications between the control l room and the auxiliary feed pump room while any normal discharge valve is closed during surveillance testing.
4. Verifying operability of each River Water Auxiliary Supply valve l by cycling each manual River Water to Auxiliary Feedwater System valve through one complete cycle.
c. Following an extended plant outage verify Auxiliary Feedwater flow from I WT-RK-10 to the Steam Generators with the Auxiliary Feedwater Valves in their normal alignment.
d. At least once per 18 months during shutdown by: l
1. Cycling each power operated (excluding automatic) valve in the flow path that is not testable during plant operation, through at least one complete cycle of full travel.
2. Verifying that each automatic valve in the flow path actuates to its correct position on a test signal.
3. Verifying that each pump starts automatically upon receipt of a test signal.

BEAVER VALLEY - UNIT 1 3/4 7-6 PROPOSED WORDING

PLANT SYSTEMS 3/4.7.3 COMPONENT COOLING WATER. SYSTEM LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.7.3.1 At least two component cooling water subsystems shall be OPERABLE.

APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, 3 and 4.

ACTION:

With less than two component cooling water subsystems OPERABLE, restore at least two subsystems to OPERABLE status within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> or be in at least HOT STAND 8Y within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.7.3.1 At laast two component cooling water subsystems shall be demonstrated OPERABLE.

a. Veri fy that each pump devlops the required differential pressure and flow rate when tested in accordance with the requirements of Section 4.0.5.
b. At least once per 31 days by verifying that each valve (manual, power-operated, or automatic) servicing safety-related equipment not locked, sealed, or otherwi se seguredinpositionisinitscorrectposition.
c. At least once per 18 months during shutdown, by cycling each power l operated valve servicing safety related equipment that is not testable during plant operation, through at least one complete cycle of full travel.

BEAVER VALLEY - UNIT 1 3/4 7-12 PROPOSED WORDING

~

PLANT SYSTEMS 3/4.7.4 REACTOR PLANT RIVER WATER SYSTEM (RPRWS)

LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.7.4.1 At least two reactor plant river water subsystems supplying safety related equipment shall be OPERABLE.

APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, 3 and 4.

ACTION:

With less than two RPRWS subsystems OPERABLE, restore at least two subsystems to OPERABLE status within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.7.4.1 At least two RPRW subsystems shall be demonstrated OPERABLE.

a. Verify th'at each pump develops the required differential pressure and flow rate when tested in accordance with the requirements of Section 4.0.5.
b. At least once per 31 days by verifyi.ng that each valve (manual, power-operated, or automatic) servicing safety-related equipment not locked, sealed, or otherwise secured in position is in its correct position; and
c. At least once per 18 months during shutdown, by cycling each power l operated valve servicing safety related equipment that is not testable during plant operation, through at least one complete cycle of full travel.

BEAVER VALLEY - UNIT 1 3/4 7-13 PROPOSED WORDING

ATTACHMENT B Proposed Technical Specification Change No. 123 No Sionificant Hazard Consideration Description of amendment request: The proposed amendment would update the pump testing surveillance requirements to reflect the applicable Standard Technical Specification (STS) requirements and to include reference to testing in accordance with Specification 4.0.5 (per the 1983 edition of ASME Section XI). Most of the changes incorporate the STS wording, however, due to design or operating differences, the revised surveillance requirements may differ.from the STS. The following changes are proposed:

Page Section Change 3/4 1-11 4.1.2.3.1 Replace this section with STS Section 4.1.2.3.1, however, discharge pressure is measured in lieu of differential pressure.

3/4 1-12 4.1.2.4.1 Replace this section with STS Section 4.1.2.4.1, however, discharge pressure is measured in lieu of differential pressure.

, 3/4 1-13 4.1.2.5 Replace this section with surveillance requirements similar to that used for other pump testing (no STS specification is applicable).

t 3/4 1-14 4.1.2.6 Replace this section with surveillance requirements similar to that used for other pump testing (no STS specification is applicable) 3/4 5-4 4.5.2.b.1, 2&3 Replace these sections with STS Section 4.5.2.f, however, discharge pressure is measured in lieu of differential pressure.

l 3/4 5-5 4.5.2.b.4 & 5 Renumber to 4.5.2.c.1 and 2 4.5.2.c, d & e Renumber to 4.5.2.d, e and f l 3/4 6-11 4.6.2.1.a.1, 2, Replace these sections with STS 3, & 4 Section 4.6.2.1.a 3/4 6-12 4.6.2.1.a.5 & 6 Replace these sections with STS Section 4.6.2.1.b 4.6.2.1.b and c Renumber to 4.6.2.1.c and d

- - - - - - y -,-,,,w_,.w- , . , r%...-, , ~ - - - . , - - - . , , - , . - e,,,e m.-v <wm..n-r %-e.,.,,,,m%-,,,--.-.r--%--.-,r-- ,,--,v-e-,---

d Attachment'D

, Page 2 Page Section Change 3/4 6-13 4.6.2.2.a Replace this section with STS 4.6.2.2.a 4.6.2.2.b Add a new 4.6.2.2.b to require verification of pump operability by pump shaft rotation since these pumps cannot be tested on recirculation.

4 3/4 6-14 4.6.2.2.be Renumber to 4.6.2.2.c 4.6.2.2.c Renumber to 4.6.2.2.d and replace with STS 4.6.2.2.b 4.6.2.2.d & e Renumber to 4.6.2.2.e and f 3/4 6-15 4.6.2.3.b Replace this section with a j requirement to verify required flow

, on recirculation when tested per similar to that used for 4.0.5, j other pump testing.

4 3/4 7-5 4.7.1.2.a.1 & 2 Revise the wording to reference pump i testing in accordance with Specification 4.0.5.

3/4 7-6 4.7.1.2.a.3 & 4 These surveillance requirements are covered above.

4.7.1.2.a.5, 6 Renumber to 4.7.1.2.b.1, 2, 3 and 4 l 7&8 4.7.1.2.a.9 Renumber to 4.7.1.2.c

, 4.7.1.2.b Renumber to 4.7.1.2.d 3/4 7-12 4.7.3.1.a.1 Renumber to 4.7.3.1.a

, 4.7.3.1.a.2 & 3 Replace these statements per STS 4.7.3.a and renumber to 4.7.3.1.b.

4.7.3.1.b Renumber to 4.7.3.1.c 3/4 ~i-13 4.7.4.1.a.1 Renumber to 4.7.4.1.a 4.7.4.1.a.2 & 3 Replace these statements per STS 4.7.4.a and renumber to 4.7.4.1.b 4.7.4.1.b Renumber to 4.7.4.1.c

]

Basis for no significant hazards determination: The proposed j changes do not involve a significant hazards consideration because operation of Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. 1 in accordance with these changes would not:

(1) involve a significant increase in the probability of occurrence or the consequence of an accident or malfunction of equipment important to safety previously evaluated. The proposed changes are intended to comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a(g)4(1). The IST program must be updated, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(g)4(1), every 120 months to the latest edition and addenda of the Code (ASME Section XI) 7 referenced in paragraph (b) of that section twelve (12) months prior to the start of the interval. Paragraph (b) references the 1983 edition through the summer 1983 addenda. The 1983

Atttchmerit B Page 3 ASME Section XI code edition allows quarterly pump testing, however, the current surveillance requirements require pump testing on a monthly basis. The revised surveillance requirements are proposed in accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(g)5(ii) which states, "If a revised inservice

inspection program for a facility conflicts with the technical specifications for a facility, the licensee shall apply to the Commission for amendment of the technical specifications to conform the technical specification to the revised program".

The proposed changes incorporate applicable portions of the STS surveillance requirements and reference testing in accordance with specification 4.0.5.

In many cases, the STS surveillance requirements may not apply and have been revised to more closely reflect the plant specific design and operating requirements. The STS differ from our current surveillance requirements as described by the following:

A. The STS do not include a requirement to cycle power-

, operated or automatic valves through one complete cycle of l full travel, this is required by many of the current pump i surveillance requirements. However, this requirement need i not be included in technical specifications since all 1

safety related valves are stroked as part of the IST program.

B. The STS do not require verification of pump operation for 15 minutes; this is required by many of the current pump surveillance requirements. The pump surveillance requirements are being revised to test in accordance with ASME Section XI which requires a 5-minute pump run time, therefore, this requirement need not be included in the

surveillance requirements.

C. The STS require verification of pump differential pressure while our current surveillance requirements specify j discharge pressure verification. Plant current

surveillance requirements and procedures verify pump

! discharge pressure and differential pressure is verified

, in accordance with specification 4.0.5. The minimum

! discharge pressure will be retained to provide the minimum pump operability requirement.

The resulting surveillance requirements comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a(g)4(1) and are consistent with the 1983 edition of ASME Section XI. Therefore, the proposed changes are considered to be administrative in )

nature and do not require physical change to any plant

! safety related systems or components and the proposed changes in testing requirements will not affect the i

function or operation of safety related equipment.

3 i

I - _ . - - . - , - - - . - _ , . - . - _ _ _ _ - . - - . . . . _ . - . - .-- .- - - - . - - - _ -

Attcchment B

+ Page 4 1

i (2) create the probability for an accident or malfunction of a different type than previously evaluated since the pump testing requirements have been revised to reflect the i applicable portions of the STS and provide consistency with the 1983 edition of ASME Section XI. The current pump testing i requirements already reflect many of the ASME Section XI requirements and are being revised to provide pump testing

surveillance requirements and format. consistent with the STS
by testing in accordance with specification 4.0.5. These changes do not affect the UFSAR system description or accident analyses of Section 14.

(3) involve a significant reduction in the margin of safety since none of the Bases for any of the pump specifications are affected by these changes. The equipment will continue to be

, operated in the same manner and the revised surveillance requirements provide clarification and consistency between pump test requirements and the 1983 edition of ASME Section XI.

Conclusion Based on the above, the proposed changes are administrative in 4 nature since the pump testing will be performed in accordance with I

the 1983 edition of ASME Section XI in lieu of the current 1974 edition. The function and operation of the equipment remain unchanged. Consequently, the proposed change will not result in a significant increase in the probability of occurrence or the consequence of an accident or malfunction of equipment important to safety, would not create an accident of a different type, and would not significantly reduce the margin of safety of the plant.

Therefore, it is proposed to characterize the proposed changes as involving a no significant hazards consideration.

i l

l

-,.-w-- .v----~..-,,--..,1__..-m_- ,-,,,___._._,.---..-.E,-_.. , . _ , , . . , , ,m_.,,_ m, , ,_w,3 -._.m .._w-r- m.e,. _ , , ,