ML20237F247

From kanterella
Revision as of 02:33, 25 January 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary of Operating Reactor Events Meeting 87-44 on 871215. List of Attendees,Events Discussed,Significant Elements of Events & Summary of Reactor Scrams Encl
ML20237F247
Person / Time
Site: Salem, Grand Gulf, Surry, Farley, 05000000
Issue date: 12/18/1987
From: Lanning W
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Rossi C
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
OREM-87-044, OREM-87-44, NUDOCS 8712290478
Download: ML20237F247 (19)


Text

4

. p p ence

+ o, UNITED STATES

! ' ,q NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 5" j WASH!NGTON, D. C. 20555 g, . v j u tC 3 o 1987 PEMORANDUM FOR: Charles E. Rossi, Director Division of Operational Events Assessment FROM: Wayne Lanning, Chief Events Assessment Branch Division of.0perational Events Assessment

SUBJECT:

THE OPERATING REACTORS EVENTS MEETING December 15, 1987 - MEETING.87 ad On December 15, 1987 an Operating Reactors Events meeting (87-44) was held to brief senior managers from NRR, RES, AE0D and Regional Offices on events which occurred since our last meeting on December 8, 1987. The list of attendees is included as Enclosure 1.

The events discussed and the significant elements of these events are presented in Enclosure 2. The Enclosure 3 provides a summary of reactor scrams and a comparison of this week's statistics with industry averages. No significant '

events were identified for input to NRC's performance indicator prograta.

i 1

a ning, Chief.

Events Assessment B h l Division of Operational Events Assessment

Enclosures:

,H As stated i cc w/ Encl.: l See Next Page 6'\

V n===7aam'a, gi j'$$

gy .

l

Y '. . ,

cc:

'T. Murley J. Sniezek F. Miraglia L. Kintner E. Jordan L. Pubenstein J. Taylor C. Patel E..Beckjord D. Fischer W. Russell, RI W. Butler J. Nelson Grace, RII E. Reeves B. Davis, RIII E. Adensam 3 R. D. Martin, RIV )'

J. B. Martin, RV W.'Kane, RI L. Reyes, RII C. Norelius, RIII J. Callan, RIV-i D. Kirsch, RV I l S. Varga )

I D. Crutchfield j B. Boger G. Lainas G. Holahan L. Shao J. Partlow 1 B. Grimes 1 F. Connel E. Weiss S. Black T. Martin J. Stone R. Hernan j H. Bailey 1 J. Guttmann A. Thadani l

1

)

, . L MEMORANDUM FOR: Charles E. Rossi, Director Director of Operational Events Assessment FROM: Wayne Lanning, Chief Events Assessment Branch Division of Operational Events Assessment

SUBJECT:

THE OPERATING REACTORS EVENTS MEETING December 15, 1987 - MEETING 87 44 On December 15, 1987 an Operating Reactors Events meeting (87-44) was held to brief senior managers from NRR, RES, AE0D and Regional Offices on events which occurred since our last meeting on December 8,1987. The list of attendees is included as Enclosure 1.

The events discussed and the significant elements of these events are presented in Enclosure 2. The Enclosure 3 provides a summary of reactor scrams and a i

comparison of this week's statistics with industry averages. No significant i events were identified for input to NRC's performance indicator program.

Wayne Lanning, Chief Events Assessment Branch Division of Operational Events Assessment

Enclosures:

As stated cc w/ Encl.:

See Next Page DISTRIBUTION

% Central File EABReadingEile ]

Circulating Copy EAB Staff MLReardon, EAB D0udinot, EAB LKilgore, SECY, PDR i

I 0FC :EAB/NRR :C:E //(RR  :  :  :  :  : :

.....:.fwa'g....:. V.___.:..._______..:__.......___:..........__:.. .._______......__....

NAME:MLR7a*rdon :W ing  :  :  :  :  :

i .__..:..__........:.....______.:..__ ...__..: .__....____:.__________.:........____:.-_____..__.

DATE :12//4 /87 :12/17'/87: :  :  :  :  :

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY s

ENCLOSURE 1 LIST OF ATTENDEES OPERATING REACTORS EVENTS BRIEFING (87-44)

December 15, 1987 NAME ORGANIZATION NAME ORGANIZATION J. Sniezek NRR/DONRR. P. Baranowsky. NRR/D0EA M.L. Reardon NRR/EAP. E. Weiss AE0D W. Jensen NRR/DOEA G. Lainas NRR/ADR II F. Miraglia NRR/ADP B. Grimes NRR/DRIS A. Thadani NRR/DLPQ C. Schulten NRR/DOEA

0. Chapra NRR/SELB B. Buckley NRR/PD 2-1 J. Thompson NRR/DOEA . D. Moran 'NRR/PD 4 M. Sanchez Spanish C.S.N. G. Lanik AEOD/ROAB i J. Heltemes AE0D T.M. Novak AEOD C. Willis NRR/PRPB L.J. Cunningham NRR/RPP l T. Silko AEOD J. Roe -NRR/DLP0 N. Fields NRR/DOEA R. Scholl, Jr. NRR/DOEA l

l l

l l

l L__-__________________-_____________.

ENCLOSURE 2 OPERATING REACTORS EVENTS BRIEFING 87 TUESDAY, DECEMBER 15, 1987, 31 A.M.

THE AGENDA INFORMATION MAY ALSO BE 0BTAINED BY DIALING EXTENSION 27]74, GRAND GULF 1 MISALIGNED FUEL ASSEMBLY

)

SURRY 1 8 2 STEAM GENERATOR' TUBE RUPTURE' '

l ANALYSIS DEFICIENCY EALEM 1 & 2 DEFICIENCIES IN ONSITE ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM FARLEY 2 SAFETY INJECTION LINE PIPE CRACK

\

)

l i

l l 1

FRAND GULF UNIT 1 i MISALIGNED FUEL ASSEMBLY NOVEMBER 20, 1987-PROBLEM A PERIPHERAL FUEL ASSEMBLY WAS MISALIGNED.

SIGNIFICANCE POTENTIAL GENERIC IMPLICATIONS TO BWR-6 OWNERS. CONCERN FOR FUEL ASSEMBLY AND SUPPORT STRUCTURE DAMAGE UPON IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES TO FREE ASSEMBLY. THERMAL HYDRAULIC PERFORMANCE.

DISCUSSION o CLINTON AND PERRY LICENSEES CHECKING PREVIOUS CORE LOADING VIDE 0 TAPES.

o ONLY BWR-6s AFFECTED DUE TO UPPER CORE PLATE DESIGN.

o GE PERFORMED A SAFETY ANALYSIS AND DETERMINED THAT AN ADEQUATE MARGIN OF SAFETY WAS MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES DUE TO THE FLOW DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CORE.

o THIS EVENT HAS OCCURRED AT FOREIGN GE BWR-6 PLANTS (JUNE 1985) l WITH ADEQUATE SAFETY MARGINS MAINTAINED.

o THE MtJOR CONCERN WAS DAMAGE-T0 THE FUEL ASSEMBLY ASSOCTATED WITH RETRIEVAL OPERATIONS.

FOLLOWUP o GE IS PLANNING TO NOTIFY BPR-6 CUSTOMERS AFTER STUDYING THE-FEASIBILITY OF AN ENGINEERING FIX.

o U.S. BWR-G LICENSEES NOTIFIED VIA EACH OF THE RESPECTIVE PROJFCT MANAGERS.

l CONTACT: J. THOMPSON

e, , m,,-m._ ..

4' ' ,

. 7. .... . ....

. .g...,.... ,

'"lf,II,$.f17 l .

I

.m @

O -

  • I sElf)if 2 !!

lN,p&;L '

!!p8l "s

,e t;i lyss 1 4 -

g<j s se es38  ! !

ji e

re:gr i

'$f}syl.k(?$$

m

~~~~

  • bE'
  • EIN8E M E N '.

GRAND GULF UNIT 1 1,g ,

. N .

4

,f

f. . .

KUD5H2.NCs STUC.K SUNDL6. RBMOVR L.

f

. me J- Pounos~put. t 7 LUA5 SRM1 DIRGu". TION AS BUNbl.E 1

OLD FULL GRRPi1G Caste

  • .SR(GT1 ROPG.
1. ,

}

f -

e j C/S HOOK r  :

  • e

, g '.

.s -

.R. NGEE .

A / t ? l t 8l'

~"

. ..a o

3

.\

C

{

SllRRY llNITS 1 8 '

STEAM GENERATOR TUBE RUPTURE ANALYSIS DEFICIENCY s, i PROBLEM BREAK LOCATION NOT PREVIOUSLY CONSIDERED IN STEAM GENERATOR TUBE O ((t '

RUPTURE ANALYSIS. BREAK COULD BECOME UNCOVERED DllRING EVENT,  !

L

~ SIGNIFICANCE WHEN THE BREAK IS NOT COVERED BY WATER, lHE AMOUNT OF-RADIOACTIVE' '

O

  • f

?g' IODINE RELEASED TO THE ATMOSPHERE CAN INCREASE BY A FACTOR OF 10,0.

]

Q DISCUSSION f, f f' l -

I o ON DECEMBER 9, 1987 THE LICENSEE REPORTED THAT NEW STEAM I GENERATOR TUBE RUPTURE ANALYSES ARE IN PROGRESS.tTOR SURRY.

o THESE INDICATE STEAM GENERATOR TUBE'UNC0VERY FffR1A3 LONG AS 14 MINUTES.

O PROBLEM FIRST IDENTIFIED AT NORTH ANNA F01. LOWING STEAU,'6ENERATOR MODIFICATION REANALYSIS. s , s I

o SURRYSTEAMGENERATORDIFFERENTDESIGNFPONNORTHANNA.

o MINIMUM STEAM GENERATOR MASS WAF USED :N TH E NEWAplYj%h 1 o

PREVIOUSANALYSESUSEDMAXIMUMSTEAMGENERATORfBSSTO\ CALCULATE MAXIMUM OVERFILL.  ;'

] a o FOLLOWINGTURBINETRIPINCREASEDSECONDM,v(PRESSUREMUSkS,i.EYEL SHRINK WHICH CAN CAUSE TUBE UNC0VERY. t

,s o SHRINK WOULD BE MAXIMIZED BY CONDENSER DUMF FAILURE AND PED!)CED g AFW FLOW.

o PLANT DATA INDICATE TUBE UNC0VERY MAY HAVE OCCURRED FOLLOWING TURBINE TRIP EVENTS AT SURRY. V o LICENSEE PLANS TO COMPLETE ANALYSES BY DECEMBER 18 AND THEN '

MEET WITH THE STAFF. <

  • i o LICENSEEDOESNOTEXPECT10CFR100,LIMITSTOBEEXCEEDEDe$0R SURRY'.

(-

CONTACT: F. JENSEN

s k

_2_

l t '

o WESTINGHOUSE BELIEyES SOME' CUT NOT ALL OTHER PLANTS MAY HAVE Tile K

./ SAME PROBLEM.

o WESTINGHOUSE SAFETY REVIEW. COMMITTEE TO MEET THIS WEEK AUD.WILI.

DECIDE ON METHOD OF REPORTING.

o WESTINGHOUSE DOES NOT Bf.LIEVE 10 CFR 100 LIMITS WILL BE EXCEEDED FOR ANY PLANT. s f_0LL01 P t )-

o " NRR IS CONTINUING TO DISCUSS THIS ISSilE WITH VIRGINI A POWER 'AND WESTINGH0llSES o NRRWILLDETEk'.INEIFICEi'LANTSCOULDBEAFFECTED.

i

$ .; \  !/ ,

s -  :

\

) .s s

\  %.

T .' t . ,

(

L i[,

J

)

L j

t 4

i, -

p i

1

\ 'l t

,. \

1 \ ,g i

, ( ,,

. s l x ,

_ _ - - - - - - - - - - ab "

-- m--

%, t<

3 i

4 .s

<<. l

.m . .

)

J , j

-i 1 St[Au OUTLif i

.') 1 f  %  !

  1. 4'4k _stri

, , N0 y CARRYOVER I pggagg53 sgpagatoa

= ~ .j Y)r s,..

Lis[L INDICAT M $ 9 ,

j g 46.6 f j P((PL($$ {&1 N$ p $wiRL tAhi A$$[NBLy DRAIN PIP [ SEAL Puta[ft% * '

s A f v -

J g Fi[CraffR INTRODUCfD INTO ffEDWATERINLitji 7In<u

% {(["'b D0an[0MER insouGa Annut AR RaC 39.e-L(#[L CONTROL INDICaf0*

f([DtAf(R RihC-E a ffN 36.03 .

l  ; 33.4

) 74 Jr$1T ION wtAPP[1. -+ /,,4 00W800WIR FLOW

.. / ,

R'3451ANCE Platt 455EuBLY E

- ) __ 27,3,  !

Pr-- - -

W l ,

v tats -'y ] TU8I $UPPOR15 23 'O

--  : A

$1[8W-6AllR f Ml'47t;4[ ~ % l <

i f94 wat99tR Yh.~.. 0 l

ij 4 aa ~

- - STAT f00 f

}

l- 8..tB l .

) [ \ <{

I j

' *j'% $Pa[!R

J fi-i li - 1 I-10.*7 1 ,,

D Al[F f h?[R$ MF AltWy Jpp 80 t t f 6 ',[C7:04.-- _

. h - l?

2.06 i

M j*PL dh i k- li dlL lhDatatot i ,

l sew 21 $) ear <smwa -

... y,gy

! . _ = _ .

PARiaison PL47C %

I

{ C00LAN' tai-ita (I C I

PRiuAuf (catan; nozztt - '

n .

L J

p .

I:

y Fnye 4.1-1 51 Senes Steam Generator Schemat.c l'

F

-SURRY UNITS 1 & 2

.8

. I i

Ie

---m--.--.---. 4-ik

SALEM UPTTS 1 8 '

PROBLEM CERTA 1M SAFETY RELATED MOTOR CONTROL CENTERS COULD EXPERIENCE ,

UNDERVOLTAGE CONDITIONS DURING LOCA COINCIDENT WITH DEGRADED GRID VOLTAGE.

SIGNIFICANCE THIS SITUATION COULD IMPA!R THE ABILITY OF REDUNDANT SAFETY RELATED EQUIPMENT TO SAFELY SHUTDOWN THE PLANT FOLLOWING ACCIDENT /

TRANSIENT.

DISC!!SSION O PRESENTLY BOTH SALEM UNITS ARE SHUT DOWN.

l o ON NOVEMBEP ?7, 1987, THE LICENSEE REPORTED A DESIGN DEFICIENCY l

(0MITTED CALCULATIONS) IN THE DEGRADED GRID VOLTAGE PROTECTTON PROVIDED FOR SALEM UNITS 1 8 1.

o IF THE VOLTAGE AT THE SAFETY RELATED 4KV BUSES. REMAINS JUST AB0VE THE SECOND LEVEL UNDERVOLTAGE RELAY SETPOINT OF 91.6%

(DEGRADED GRID AND FAILURE OF 0FFSITE TRANSFORMER TAP CHANGER)

COINCIDENT WITH LOCA, THE OPERATION OF CERTAIN SAFETY RELATED VALVES COULD BE IMPAIRED.

o THE LICENSEE HAS DETERMINE THAT THE 230V, "1A", "1B", AND "1C" SERVICE WATER CONTROL CENTERS COULD MAINTAIN VOLTAGES AS. LOW AS 87.5% OF DESIGN (MIN. ALLOWED IS 89%).

o PROBLEM LIKELY EXISTS AT OTHER CONTROL CENTERS AND HAS BEEN PRESENT AT SALEM UNIT 1 8 2 FOR SOME TIME.

O CONDITION MAY BE ATTRIBUTED TO LICENSEE FAILURE TO PERFORM A )

COMPREHENSIVE DESIGN ANALYSIS OF'THE ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION  !

SYSTEM AFTER ADDITIONAL LOADS WERE ADDED (LOAD CREEP) TO THE )

SYSTEM SINCE THE LAST VOLTAGE STUDY WAS DONE.

i FOLLOWUP l 0 ENGINEERING EVALUATION (VOLTAGE DROP CALCULATIONS) 0F THE ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM FOR BOTH UNITS BY THE LICENSEE.  :

CONTACT: N. FIELDS

1 I

(

IS CONTINUING IN AN EFFORT TO RESOLVE THIS ISSUE BEFORE RESTART o

ESF WILL REVIEW AND EVALUATE LICENSEE's SHORT TERM CORRECTIVE ACTIONS AND LONG TERM RESOLUTION, I 1

I 1

l i

I i

i l

'J Attachment'1. v- ~

~ -

IN 86-100 l

December 12, 1986 '

1

. i C O w

g 2 l O

' *'-i > 0 A 3 g 2 j Hn v 1 g I N

D k k n m4 --4 >

5 h h O g g 9@ 2 3 . _ , q H% _ _ - . . . A q ,

ma . .

e p' U t >---

r4

" n 2 w

-i l , % ^g , e

\

L F 0 .J i r m

< 2

  • m >
2. m 4f
  • O g
n. 2 ^q > c O.

b2E w^-q i 2 > (

Zoo O 4 D o n. g 2 p' *A O' y V F a

E '

w 3 o z e r j J c w

< w i

~n-i i m j a 1

M$ o D y 46

(/) Do 2 CD n F A D-o

<f y'

' ~~~""

$ 1 z g e, )

y

- -A

^ >

O $ y.

C a, W 2 E p w h Om

=D E, z OE 3 w Q o b 2 $ g'

  • N m I y x Dx 1 O O q V 1

F wb k . N - CC 4

> p CD W

> -c2  !

2 3w 4 DF0 j i

l

~

e j l  !

I

a

  • *L4

- k4o D

I t+ w* \\\j 1

- ~

g m W W V gLi S Q, $14dwbe s s E o

4

~e .

% v Ks -

0 o

' n o ,

'N 3 1. -

3ts

. o- , , ,_

aa

%,dj D

r[ <

s t

? E.

'- a d o

. _ _ _ -_ . ~

M,< ' Ekl o C

4 Wo a uM  %

$l J Ml sN 13:e .

\

I- To cd d

{ O

.jp p)

. / )- Q f,  %, , ,,

j s .

l ^O 's. $

a &

1. 1,

~

.s ,

4 fg -

~

  • O T l SE}s.1 O.

e

  • 4

-\ -

1 gga =';. [

t

' g

?, o o a eJ adWs%a tT% 5:  ;

u) ~3

  • o n

~

9

Updated 12/15/87 LONGTERM FOLLOWUP ASSIGNMENTS TO BE COMPLETED ORGANIZATION LONGTERM FOLLOWUPS OUTSTANDING 12/01/87 12/08/87 12/15/87 SPLBl 7 7 6 i

EMTB 2 2 1 OGCB ' 16 ' 16 7 RVIB 11 11 8 SRXB 5 ~6 3 PD3-2 1 1 0 DRIS 2 2 0 PD2-3 2 3 2 OSP 1 1 1 ESGB 2 2 2 AEOD 2 2 3 SICB 6 6 4 PRPB 2 3 0 SELB 8 9 9 OTSB 2 1 0 RES 1 1 1 PD2-2 1 1 I j 1

PD5 1 1 3  :

RV 1 1 1 SICB 0 2 0 PD3-2 0 1 1 EWEB O 1 0 LHFB 0- 1 3

1 F.EA: TOR ECKAn SU3XAF.V Ef1 CLOSURE 3 EEEr ENJIN512/14167

1. PLANT EFECIFIC LATA LATE SITE UNIT FCsEE SISKAL CAUEE COMPLI- YTD YTD YTD CAT 10N5 AIOVI IELOW TOTAL 151 151

~

l 12/07/B7 NINE MILE F01NT 1 94 A EDUlFMENT NG 2 0 2 12/07/37 LAVISIESEE 1 E2 A ECU1F5ENT ND 4 0 4 12/0?!57 FEFE CEEEL 1 100 A E991PMENT~ h2 5 2 7 12/07/27 FITIFATEICr 1 100 A FERSONNEL  !;0 6 0 6 12/10/E7 OL'A3 Cli1EE 2 100 A EQUITEENT YES 5 0 5 12/11/37 EATE:.FCEL 3 90 A EDUlFMENT NG 7 0 7 12/1 1E7 LIAIL0 CANYCN 1 100 A UNKNOWN E0 - 5 0 5

SUMMARY

0F COMPLICATIONS SITE UNii CCMFLICATIDK3 DUAD CITIES 2 KFW EES VALVE LO:KEL OFEN l

l l

l l

1 l

l 1

l l

1 i

~

\

~

1

s II. cot 1PARIEON DC WEEKLY STATISTICS WITH INDUSTRY .'E P W E SCRAME COR WEEF ENDING 12/1;/E7 SCRAM CAUSE FOWER NUMEER 1957 1986 1985 OF WEEKLY WEEKLY WEEKLY SCRAMS (5) AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE YTD (3) (4) (8) (9)

    • POWER >15%

EQUIP. RELATED >15% 5 4.O' 4.3 5.4 PERS. RELATED(6) >15% 0 1.2 1.8 2.0 OTHER(7) >15% 2 1.2 0.4 0.6

    • Subtotal ** ~

7 6.4 6.5 G.O

    • POWER <15%

EQUIP. RELATED <15% 0 1.1 1.4 1.3 PERS. RELATED <15% O O.6 O.8 O.9 6THER <15% .O O.3 O.2 0. 2

    • Subtotal **

O 2.0 2.4 2.4

      • Total ***

7 8.4 2.9 10.4 l

MANUAL VS AUTO SCRAMS TYPE NUMBER -1987 1986 1985 OF WEEKLY WEEKLY WEEKLY SCRAMS AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE YTD MANUAL SCRAMS O 1.4 1.O 1.O AUTOMATIC SCRAMS 7 7.1 7.9 9.4

l NOTES -

! 1. PLANT SPECIFIC DATA BASED ON INITIAL REVIEW 0F 50.72 REPORTS FOR THE WEEK OF INTEREST. PERIOD IS MIDNIGHT SUNDAY ~ THROUGH ',

MIDNIGHT SUNDAY SCRAMS ARE DEFINED AS REACTOR PROTECTIVE ACTUATIONS WHICH RESULT IN ROD MOTION, AND EXCLUDE PLANNED TESTS OR SCRAMS AS PART OF PLANNED SHUTDOWN IN ACCORDANCE WITH A PLANT PROCEDURE.

E. RECOVERY COMPLICATED BY EQUIPMENT FAILURES OR PERSONNEL ERRORS UNRELATED TO CAUSE OF SCRAM.

3. 1986 INFORMATION DERIVED FROM ORAS STUDY OF UNPLANNED REACTOR TRIPS IN 1986. WEEKLY DATA DETEP. MINED BY TAXING TOTAL TRIPS IN A GIVEN CATEGORY AND DIVIDING BY 52 WEEKS / YEAR.
4. IN 1986, THERE WERE AN ESTIMATED TOTAL OF 461 AUTOMATIC AND f%NUAL UNPLANNED REACTOR TRIPS AT 104 REACTORS (HOLDING OPERATING LICENSES). THFS YIELDS AN AVERAGE RATE OF 4.4 TRIPS PER REACTOR PER YEAR AND AN-AYERAGE RATE OF 8.8 TRIPS PER WEEK FOR ALL REACTORS.
5. BASED ON 109 REACTORS HOLDING AN OPERATING LICENSE.
6. PERSONNEL RELATED PROBLEMS INCLUDE HUMAN ERROR, PROCEDURAL DEFICIENCIES, AND MANUAL STEAM GENERATOR LEVEL CONTROL PROBLEMS.
7. "0THER" INCLUDES AUT0!!ATIC S01 AMS ATTRIBUTED TO ENVIRONMENTAL CAUSES (LIGHTNING), SYSTEM DESIGN, OR UNKNOWN CAUSE.
8. ]

1985 INFORMATION DERIVED FROM AN ORAS STUDY OF UNPLANNED REACTOR TRIPS IN 1985. WEEKLY DATA DETERMINED BY TAKING TOTAL TRIPS IN A GIVEN CATEGORY AND DIVIDING BY 52 WEEKS / YEAR. '

9. IN 1985. THERE WERE AN ESTIllATED TOTAL OF 541' AUTOMATIC AND MANUAL 'j 8 UNPLANNED REACTOR TRIPS AT 93 REACTORS (HOLDING FULL POWER LICENSES). THIS YIELDS AN AVERAGE RATE OF 5.0 TRIPS PER REACTOR YEAR AND AN AVERAGE RATE OF 10.a TRIPS PER WEEK FOR ALL REACTORS.

I gr I

t.

]

. :_.__ _ _