ML20245B561

Exam Rept 50-302/OL-87-03 of Exam Administered on 870518-21. Exam Results:Three of Four Reactor Operators Passed & All Six Senior Operators Passed Oral & Written Exams

ML20245B561
Person / Time
Site:	Crystal River
Issue date:	06/12/1987
From:	Bill Dean NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20216F649	List: ML20216F645 ML20245B561
References
50-302-OL-87-03, 50-302-OL-87-3, NUDOCS 8706300911
Download: ML20245B561 (3)

Text

.

l ENCLOSURE 1 EXAMINATION REPORT 302/0L-87-03 Facility Licensee: Florida Power Corporation P. Os Box 219 Crystal River, FL 32629 Facility Name: Crystal River Nuclear Plant facility Docket No.: 50-302 Facility authorized written examinations were administered at Crystal River i Training Center near Crystal River, Florida. NRC Oral examinations were j administered at Crystal iv Unit 3 ne r Cr s al River, Florida. >

Chief Examiner: '

1. b Wirlial M. Dean Date Signed Approved by: i John F. Munro, Section Chief Date Signed Summa ry: l l

Examinations on May 18-21, 1987.

Oral examinations were administered to four operators and four senior operators all of whom passed. '

The facility administered written examinations to four R0s and six SR0s, all of whom passed with the exception of one R0.

Based on the results described above, three of four R0's passed and six of six SR0's passed.

i

)

)

8706300911 870622 j PDR ADDCK 05000302  !

V PDR

f 1

REPORT DETAILS

1. Facility Employees Contacted:

1

• Larry Kelley, Training Manager Johnnie Smith, Operations Training Supervisor

• Paul Fleming, Requalification Training Lead Instructor

• Ron Long, Requalification Training Instructor

')

• Attended Exit Meeting

2. Examiners:

• W. M. Dean L. L. Lawyer C. A. Casto

• Chief Examiner j

3. Exit Meeting At the conclusion of the site visit the examiners met with representatives 1 of the plant staff to discuss the results of the examination. )

A There were some generic weaknesses noted during the oral examinations.

The areas of below normal performance were knowledge of radiation detection theory and use of inplant computers for boron calculations.

The cooperation given to the examiners and the effort to ensure an atmosphere in the control room conducive to oral examinations was also noted and appreciated.

The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the material provided to or reviewed by the examiners.

l l

I l

4 q

i l

.i j > .~--J

L J

, l

[

ENCLOSURE 2  !

REQUALIFICATION PROGRAM EVALUATION REPORT l

Facility: Crystal River Nuclear Plant Examiner: W. M.

Dear.,

L. L. Lawyer, C. A. Casto '

f.

Dates of Evaluation: May 18-21, 1987 Areas Evaluated: X Written X Oral N/A Simulator Examination Results:

R0 SR0 Total Evaluation Pass / Fail Pass / Fail Pass / Fail (S, M or U)

Written Examination

• 3/1 6/0 9/1 S l Operating Examination ]

I Oral 4/0 4/0 8/0 s j i

Simulator N/A N/A N/A N/A Evaluation of facility written examination grading S l I

1

• Facility administered written examination under the aegis of the NRC's Pilot Requalification Program.

Overall Program Evaluation Sa tis factory.

Weaknesses noted in the development and administration of the written examination by the facility weie lack of " depth of understanding" questions (particularly theory and procedures) fo. SR0s, and too limited a scope / amount of questions to rationalize giving a six hour written examination.

l I

i t

1

. i l

m __ _