ML20140B138

From kanterella
Revision as of 12:51, 28 June 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Stipulation That ASLB May Enter Order Dismissing Intervenor Contention VIII-12(a) Re Failure of Onsite Emergency Plans to Demonstrate Adequate Arrangements for Medical Svcs for Lack of Controversy
ML20140B138
Person / Time
Site: Limerick  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 01/17/1986
From: Conner T, Elliot C, Ferkin Z, Rutberg J
ELLIOTT, C.W., LIMERICK ECOLOGY ACTION, INC., NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD), PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC, PENNSYLVANIA, COMMONWEALTH OF
To:
Shared Package
ML20140B128 List:
References
OL, NUDOCS 8601230463
Download: ML20140B138 (3)


Text

!

g '

00CMer"en UhkC '

di#22 g g UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - TI Utd 1:,

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION PR$!kf%%

BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY 2,

)

y Docket Nos. 50-35) OL (Limerick Generating Station, 50-353 OL

)

(Units 1 and 2)

)

)

)

STIPULATION Limerick Ecology Action, Inc. (LEA) and Philadelphia Electric Co. (PECO) stipulate and agree as follows:

In 1982, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) in this proceeding admitted LEA contention,VIII-12(a), which alleged, inter alia, that PECO's onsite emergency plans failed to demonstrate that adequate arrangements had been made for medical services for onsite contaminated injured individuals.

After hearing,.the ASLB found against tho' contention in its Second Partial Initial Decision dated August 29, 1984,with Judge Lawrence Brenner dissenting.

On appeal by LEA, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board (ASLAB), by its decision dated October 22, 1985, reversed the ASLB decision on LEA's contention, and romanded for further proceedings to S6o123o43 p SMilp "'

.= ^

osoogga

l consider alternative options for additional backup medical services for onsite contaminated injured persons.

On or about November 15, 1985, PECO entered into an agreement with Montgomery Hospital, Norristown, PA, in which inter alia, Mont-gomery Hospital agreed to provide hospital treatment for Limerick Generating Station onsite contaminated injured persons, and PECO agreed to provide specialized training, equipment, and procedures for Montgomery Hospital's treatment of onsite contaminated injured persons.

On or about December 23, 1985, counsel for PECO provided counsel for LEA with copies of draft procedures and list of specialized equip-4 ment to be used at Montgomery Hospital, and a plan of instruction for Montgomery Hospital emergency department physicians and nurses.

On December 31, 1985, LEA counsel conferred with Montgomery Hos-pital administrator Robert flood, who confirmed that Montgomery !!ospital and PECO were in the process of implementing the provisions of the November 15, 1985 agreement.

4 Based upon (1) LEA's review of the November 15, 1985 agreement, the equipment list, plan of instruction, and draft procedures for Montgomery Hospital, and (2) LEA counsel's conference with Montgomery llospital administrator Robert flood, LEA has determined that PECO has made arrangements for a " reasonable option addressed to the concerns

-2 -

. _ . ~

o raised by LEA's contention" as required by the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board in Philadelphia Electric Co. (Limerick Genera-ting Station Units 1 and 2), ALAB-819, NRC , (1985) (Slip op.

p. 49 n. 47), and that those concerns are no longer a matter of con-1 troversy between LEA and PECO.

The undersigned parties stipulate that the Atomic Safety and d

Licensing Board may enter an appropriate order dismissing LEA's contention for lack of controversy, based on this stipulation.

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION LIMERICK ECOLOGY ACTION, INC.

STAFF By: j, Joge'h M #/#7)

  • utberg4 Esduire By: <de M[Nwb[lYht Charles W. Elliott, Esql '

& Counsel for Limerick COMMONWEALTil OF PENNSYLVANIA, Ecology Action, Inc.

GOVERNOR'S ENERGY COUNCIL PIIILADELPllIA ELECTRIC CO.

I By: By: M '

((

i ri G. Ferkin, Esquire 3 Troy h. Conner, Esq.6/'

sssistant Counsel Counsel for Philadelphia i

Electric Co.

l l

-w-9