ML20141F449

From kanterella
Revision as of 18:10, 26 June 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to 850207 Comments Re Revs to 10CFR11.Revs Suggested by Div of Security & Suggestions Re Style Incorporated in Revs.Proposed Regulatory Analysis Prepared. Comments on Revs & Regulatory Analysis Requested
ML20141F449
Person / Time
Issue date: 03/07/1985
From: Brown W
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
To: Felton J
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
Shared Package
ML20140E750 List:
References
FRN-50FR39076, RULE-PR-11 AB99-2-45, NUDOCS 8601090348
Download: ML20141F449 (1)


Text

, DISTRIBUTION:

FF s/f d RRentschl::r p NAR 071995 PS40RANDtM FOR: Joseph M. Felton, Director Division of Rules and Records Office of Adninistration FRGt: Willard B. Brown Chief Fuel Facility Safeguards Licensing Branch Division of Safeguards. IMSS SU3 JECT: REVIEW OF PROPOSED REVISIONS TO 10 CFR PART 11 In your memorandura of February 7,1985. you connented on a draft of a revised 10 CFR Fart 11 and a Regulatory Flexibility Statament supporting that revision.

You suggested certain stylistic changes to Part 11. a preamble and a revised Regulatory Flexibility Statement. You also indicated that a Regulatory Analysis would substitute fcr the Regulatory Flexibility Statement if the proposal stage to rulomaking is to be bypassed.

! We do intend to go directly to t;nal rulemaking on Part 11 on the basis that

the revisions wt.ich we propose are of a minor and adsinistrative nature which

! can t - proculgated under the authority of the Executive Director for Operations.

tioreover, we are not changing any forus or reporting requirseents. thereby i clicinatir.g any need for DNS papenvork clearance.

Subsequent to the review reflected in your February 7,1985 memo. we have adopted a nu::ter of revisions suggested by the Division of Security. We have also incorporated the suggestions of your mano regarding style, etc. Finally.

- we have produced a proposed Regulatory Analysis. .

1 We solicit your continued support in developing a revised 10 CFR Part 11 and requx;t t!.at you provido us cc::nents on these two docisaents. Our contact for lhts activity is Russel R. Rentschler. X74761.

1 Co:N! sig ed by wwd 8. Brown Willard D. Drosn. Chief Fuel Facility Safegusrds Licensing Branch Division of Safeguards. ESS Attaen:acnts:

1. Regulatory Analysis
2. Revised 10 CFR Part 11 06010903#

pp 8

,[.q._.... PjR gpp3907A,_pon

..y.__.._4___.._._

~

r,GF G' , . 5C

. .} .

~~ pentschier: W own .  !

!. . .f . . ......l. I b/l.*\ /85 [35 .b/f/.85

........1....

, m w.- wrens- m- - - -- _