|
---|
Category:AFFIDAVITS
MONTHYEARML20058B6891993-05-0707 May 1993 Affidavit of RP Barkhurst to File W/Nrc Encl TS Change Request NPF-38-135 ML20137J2941985-08-21021 August 1985 Affidavit of Kw Cook Re Recent Equipment Failures Discussed in Joint Intervenors 850809 Petition for Review.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20112A9381985-03-14014 March 1985 Affidavit of RP Barkhurst Re Power Ascension Testing Program Performed at Levels Above 5% Rated Power & Delay in Issuance of Full Power Operating Authority.Related Correspondence ML20111C7021985-03-14014 March 1985 Affidavit of RP Barkhurst Re Power Ascension Testing Program to Be Performed at Levels Above 5% of Rated Power.Facility & Operating Staff in Excellent State of Readiness to Proceed W/Power Ascension ML20195F5871985-02-25025 February 1985 Affidavit of Rk Kerr Re 841120 Meeting W/Cain,Dd Driskill, R Barkhurst,Admiral Williams & Rs Leddick to Discuss Licensee 1983 Drug Investigation 05-001-83(966) & 841206 Meeting Between Licensee & NRC in Arlington,Tx ML20112B3291985-01-0707 January 1985 Affidavit of Jl Ehasz Supporting Conclusion That Cracks Do Not Significantly Affect Structural Adequacy of Facility Basemat.Related Correspondence ML20112B3411985-01-0404 January 1985 Affidavit of Mj Holley Supporting Conclusion That Cracks Do Not Significantly Affect Structural Adequacy of Facility Basemat.Related Correspondence ML20112B3581985-01-0303 January 1985 Affidavit of Rf Burski Supporting Conclusion That Cracks Do Not Significantly Affect Structural Adequacy of Facility Basemat.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20112B3471985-01-0303 January 1985 Affidavit of Kw Cook Supporting Conclusion That Cracks Do Not Significantly Affect Structural Adequacy of Facility Basemat.Related Correspondence ML20140D8301984-12-17017 December 1984 Supplemental Affidavit of DM Crutchfield in Response to Questions Raised in Aslab 841002 Memorandum & Order ALAB-786 Re Basemat Issues.Related Correspondence ML20140D8451984-12-17017 December 1984 Supplemental Affidavit of Re Shewmaker in Response to Questions Raised in Aslab 841002 Memorandum & Order ALAB-786 Re Conclusions Reached by Civil/Structural Allegation Review Team Concerning Basemat Issues.Related Correspondence ML20140D8811984-12-17017 December 1984 Supplemental Affidavit of R Pichumani Re Basemat Issues. Related Correspondence ML20140D9441984-12-17017 December 1984 Supplemental Affidavit of Jp Knight Re Basemat Issues. Related Correspondence ML20140D9621984-12-17017 December 1984 Affidavit of M Reich,Ca Miller & Cj Constantino Re Safety Significance of Concrete Cracking Observed in Foundation Basemat.Supporting Documentation Encl.Related Correspondence ML20140D9121984-12-12012 December 1984 Affidavit of Js Ma in Response to Request in Aslab 841002 Memorandum & Order ALAB-786 for Update on Affiant Views Re Cracking of Basemat.Supporting Documentation Encl.Related Correspondence ML20195F5231984-12-0707 December 1984 Affidavit of Rd Martin Re Meeting Between Region IV & Licensee at Region Ofc on 841206 to Discuss Licensee Corrective Actions on Investigation of Drug Use by Facility Reactor Operators That Licensee Initiated in May 1983 ML20195F5611984-12-0606 December 1984 Affidavit of Rs Leddick Re Licensee Investigation of Alleged Marijuana Use by Facility Reactor Operators.Ack Knowledge of Licensee Investigative Rept 5-001-83(966) in Nov 1984.W/ Initialed Handwritten Changes ML20195F4551984-12-0505 December 1984 Affidavit of W Cavanaugh Re Investigation of Alleged Drug Use by Reactor Operators at Facility.States That Continuation of Investigation Delayed Until After Operator Licensing Exam ML20195F4201984-11-20020 November 1984 Affidavit of Jm Cain Re Facility Policy About Drug Use by Employees & Licensee Investigation Rept 5-001-83(966) on Drug Usage by Reactor Operators ML20195F4021984-11-20020 November 1984 Affidavit of Wc Nelson Re Licensee Investigation of Drug Use by Facility Reactor Operators.Affirms Suspension of Subj Investigation Until After 830712 Because Investigation Adding Stress to Preparation for NRC Licensing Exam ML20107K6781984-11-0505 November 1984 Affidavit of Tm Devine Re Desire of Three Witnesses Who Signed Affidavits to Keep Identities Confidential ML20096B5691984-08-0606 August 1984 Affidavit of M Reich,Ca Miller & Cj Constantino Re Safety Significance of Concrete Cracking in Foundation Base Mat. Prof Qualifications & Addendum to BNL Review of Facility Base Mat Analysis Encl.Related Correspondence ML20079F3401984-01-12012 January 1984 Affidavit of Tf Gerrets Re Allegations of Missing & Phony QA Documentation & Forged Signatures on Safety Insps ML20080M6761983-09-27027 September 1983 Affidavit of Jl Ehasz Supporting Util Opposition to Joint Intervenors Motion to Reopen on safety-related Concrete. Cracks Expected to Form in Concrete Mat,Enabling Transfer of Tensile Load from Concrete to Embedded Steel ML20080M6941983-09-27027 September 1983 Affidavit of Wf Gundaker Supporting Util Opposition to Joint Intervenors Motion to Reopen Record on safety-related Concrete.Corrosion of Reinforcing Steel in Concrete Mat Will Not Occur to Significant Degree.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20028F1721983-01-26026 January 1983 Affidavit of s Duplessis on Brochure, Plans to Help You During Emergencies. Individuals W/Sixth Grade Reading Skills Can Read Brochure,But Brochure Is Poorly Organized ML20028G2201983-01-26026 January 1983 Affidavit of El Duncan Re Emergency Info Brochure.Brochure Violates Keep It Simple Stupid Principle. Method of Brochure Distribution Faulty.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20083N0831983-01-24024 January 1983 Affidavit of El Duncan Re Emergency Info Brochure.Brochure Violates Keep It Simple Stupid Principle.Both Maps Deficient as Presented.Brochure Fails to Speak Directly to Educ Level of Affected Persons ML20063N2691982-09-14014 September 1982 Affidavit of Deplessis.Only Small Segment of Population in Parishes Will Be Able to Read Info Brochure w/75% Comprehension.Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20063N2581982-09-11011 September 1982 Affidavit of El Duncan Re Emergency Info Brochure.Brochure Shows No Understanding of Target Population or Subgroups within Target Population.Method of Distributing Brochure Is Faulty ML20063N2641982-09-11011 September 1982 Affidavit of P Winograd Re Document on Plans to Aid Area Residents During Emergencies.Readability of Document Works Out to Be First Yr College Matl.Format Makes Vital Info Hard to Locate.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20063D1971982-06-30030 June 1982 Affidavit Requesting Certain Info Contained in Encl CEN-207(C)-P,CEN-208(C)-P & CEN-249(C)-P Be Withheld Per 10CFR2.790 ML20052G9481982-05-13013 May 1982 Affidavit of Rg Azzarello Answering ASLB Questions.Upon Initiation of Total Loss of Feedwater,Remaining Steam Generator Water Inventory Would Allow Approx 10-15 Minutes Before Dryout Condition Would Occur 1993-05-07
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20116G9431996-08-0707 August 1996 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re, Mods to Fitness-For-Duty Program Requirements TXX-9522, Comment Opposing Proposed GL on Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits.Believes That Complete Technical Review of All Surveillance Procedures Would Be Expensive & Unnecessary Expenditure of Licensee Resources1995-08-26026 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed GL on Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits.Believes That Complete Technical Review of All Surveillance Procedures Would Be Expensive & Unnecessary Expenditure of Licensee Resources ML20086D8841995-06-29029 June 1995 Comments on Proposed Rule Re, Review of NRC Insp Rept Content,Format & Style ML20085E5891995-06-0909 June 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to NPP Security Requirements Associated W/Containment Access Control ML20080A1331994-10-21021 October 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR2 Re Reexamination of NRC Enforcement Policy.Advises That Util of Belief That NRC Focus on Safety Significance in Insps & Enforcement Policy Can Be Achieved by Utilization of Risk Based Techniques ML20073M3261994-10-0303 October 1994 Comment on Pilot Program for NRC Recognition of Good Performance by Nuclear Power Plants ML20072B8521994-08-0505 August 1994 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Consideration of Changes to FFD Requirements.Licensee Believes Reduction in Amount of FFD Testing Warranted & Can Best Be Achieved in Manner Already Adopted by Commission ML20065P4121994-04-25025 April 1994 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Rule Re Code & Stds Re Subsections IWE & Iwl.Expresses Deep Concern About Ramifications of Implementing Proposed Rule ML20058G6211993-12-0606 December 1993 Comment on Draft NUREG/BR-0058, Regulatory Analysis Guidelines,Rev 2. Concurs W/Numarc & Nubarg Comments ML20056F3481993-08-23023 August 1993 Comment Opposing NRC Draft GL 89-10,suppl 6 ML20058B6891993-05-0707 May 1993 Affidavit of RP Barkhurst to File W/Nrc Encl TS Change Request NPF-38-135 ML20058E0251990-10-12012 October 1990 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR51 Re Renewal of Nuclear Plant OLs & NRC Intent to Prepare Generic EIS ML20055E9871990-06-29029 June 1990 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Mod for fitness-for-duty Programs & Licensed Operators.Util Believes That High Stds of Conduct Will Continue to Be Best Achieved & Maintained by Program That Addresses Integrity ML19353B2241989-12-0101 December 1989 Comments on Draft Reg Guide,Task DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Util Endorses NUMARC Comments W3P89-0196, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint Programs at Nuclear Plants.Proposed Rule Would Require Establishment of Maint Programs Based on Reg Guides That Have Not Been Developed,Proposed or Approved1989-02-28028 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint Programs at Nuclear Plants.Proposed Rule Would Require Establishment of Maint Programs Based on Reg Guides That Have Not Been Developed,Proposed or Approved ML20235V4571989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Supporting Proposed Chapter 1 Re Policy Statement on Exemption from Regulatory Control.Agrees W/Recommendations & Limits Proposed by Health Physics Society in L Taylor Ltr to Commission ML20205P9691988-10-26026 October 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re NUREG-1317, Regulatory Options for Nuclear License Renewal. Supports Contents of NUREG-1317 & Endorses NUMARC Comments on Rulemaking & Position Paper by NUMARC Nuplex Working Group W3P88-1366, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Conserning Policy Statement Re Cooperation W/States at Commercial Nuclear Power Plants or Utilization Facilities1988-07-13013 July 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Conserning Policy Statement Re Cooperation W/States at Commercial Nuclear Power Plants or Utilization Facilities ML20135F0931987-04-0909 April 1987 Testimony of Bb Hayes Before Senate Government Governmental Affairs Committee on 870326 Re Discovery of Sensitive NRC Document in Files of Senior Official of Louisiana Power & Light Co ML20212N5781986-08-27027 August 1986 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $50,000 Based on Violations Noted in Insp Conducted on 860101-31. Violation Noted:Plant Entered Mode 3 While Relying on Action Requirements of Tech Spec 3.6.2.1 ML20202G3811986-04-10010 April 1986 Order Imposing Civil Penalties in Amount of $130,000,based on Safety Insps of Licensee Activities Under CPPR-103 Conducted from June 1983 - Sept 1985.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20210B9141986-02-0505 February 1986 Notice of Publication of Encl 841219 Order.Served on 860206 ML20198H4461986-01-30030 January 1986 Memorandum & Order CLI-86-01 Denying Remaining Portion of Joint Intervenors 841108 Fifth & Final Motion to Reopen Record Re Character & Competence of Util Per 850711 Decision ALAB-812.Dissenting View of Palladino Encl.Served on 860130 ML20137J3531986-01-17017 January 1986 Order Extending Time Until 860214 for Commission to Act to Review ALAB-812.Served on 860117 ML20138P5301985-12-20020 December 1985 Order Extending Time Until 860117 for Commission to Review ALAB-812.Served on 851220 ML20137U4821985-12-0505 December 1985 Order Extending Time Until 851220 for Commission to Act to Review ALAB-812.Served on 851205 ML20138S0051985-11-15015 November 1985 Order Extending Time Until 851206 for Commission to Review ALAB-812.Served on 851115 ML20138H2451985-10-24024 October 1985 Order Extending Time Until 851115 for Commission to Act to Review ALAB-812.Served on 851024 ML20133F2711985-10-0404 October 1985 Order Extending Time Until 851025 for Commission to Act to Review ALAB-812 .Served on 851007 ML20134L5981985-08-28028 August 1985 Notice of Appearance of R Guild & Withdrawal of Appearance by L Bernabei & G Shohet for Joint Intervenors.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20137J2801985-08-26026 August 1985 Answer in Opposition to Joint Intervenors 850809 Petition for Commission Review of Aslab 850711 Decision ALAB-812, Which Denied Joint Intervenors 841108 Motion to Reopen Record.Kw Cook 850821 Affidavit Encl ML20137J2941985-08-21021 August 1985 Affidavit of Kw Cook Re Recent Equipment Failures Discussed in Joint Intervenors 850809 Petition for Review.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20136J1961985-08-19019 August 1985 Answer Requesting That Commission Deny Joint Intervenors 850809 Petition for Review of ALAB-812 Denying Motion to Reopen QA & Character Competence Issues.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20133L8901985-08-0909 August 1985 Petition for Review of ALAB-812,denying Joint Intervenor Motion to Reopen Record of OL Hearing to Litigate Util Lack of Character & Inability to Assure Safe Operation in Light of Const QA Breakdown.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20133L0421985-08-0808 August 1985 Order Extending Time Until 850920 for Commission to Act to Review ALAB-812.Served on 850808 ML20128Q1861985-07-23023 July 1985 Request for Extension of Time Until 850809 to File Appeal to 850711 ALAB-812 Denying Joint Intervenors Motion to Reopen Record.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20209F1921985-07-11011 July 1985 Decision ALAB-812 Denying Joint Intervenors 841108 Motion to Reopen Record on Const QA & Mgt Character & Competence, Except Insofar as Issues Re Matters Under Investigation by Ofc of Investigation Are Raised.Served on 850711 ML20116P1931985-05-0606 May 1985 Response to NRC & Util Responses to Aslab 850322 Memorandum & Order ALAB-801.Motion to Reopen Record of Licensing Proceedings for Litigation of Util Competence Should Be Granted.Supporting Documentation & Svc List Encl ML20116H3341985-04-30030 April 1985 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20100K3221985-04-10010 April 1985 Supplementary Comments Attesting to Validity of Statements of Fact in Sser 9 & Clarifying & Explaining Current Position on Resolution of Allegation A-48.Util Can Safely Operate & Manage Facility.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20111C7021985-03-14014 March 1985 Affidavit of RP Barkhurst Re Power Ascension Testing Program to Be Performed at Levels Above 5% of Rated Power.Facility & Operating Staff in Excellent State of Readiness to Proceed W/Power Ascension ML20112A9381985-03-14014 March 1985 Affidavit of RP Barkhurst Re Power Ascension Testing Program Performed at Levels Above 5% Rated Power & Delay in Issuance of Full Power Operating Authority.Related Correspondence ML20111B6541985-03-12012 March 1985 Motion for Leave to File Reply to Applicant Answer to Joint Intervenors Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum & Applicant Response to Supplemental Memorandum.Svc List Encl ML20102C1351985-02-28028 February 1985 Response Opposing Joint Intervenors 850225 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum & Response to Suppl.Suppl Untimely Filed.Allegations Unsupported.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20195F5871985-02-25025 February 1985 Affidavit of Rk Kerr Re 841120 Meeting W/Cain,Dd Driskill, R Barkhurst,Admiral Williams & Rs Leddick to Discuss Licensee 1983 Drug Investigation 05-001-83(966) & 841206 Meeting Between Licensee & NRC in Arlington,Tx ML20107M7461985-02-25025 February 1985 Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Joint Intervenors Motion to Reopen.Determination by Aslab That Joint Intervenors Met Burden to Reopen Record for Litigation of Contention That Util Mgt Lacks Competence Requested ML20107M7321985-02-25025 February 1985 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Motions to Reopen.Request Based on Recent Public Repts Re Instability & Lack of Independence of Mgt of Applicant & Lack of Respect for NRC ML20101T3701985-02-0101 February 1985 Answer Opposing Joint Intervenors 850125 Motion for Leave to File Reply to Applicant 841130 & Staff 841221 Answers.Motion Should Be Denied & Reply Brief Rejected.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20101U3411985-01-25025 January 1985 Joint Intervenors Motion for Leave to File Reply to Applicant & NRC 841221 Responses to Joint Intervenors 841108 Motion to Reopen Three QA & Mgt Integrity Contentions for Litigation ML20101U3511985-01-25025 January 1985 Joint Intervenors Reply to Applicant & NRC 841221 Responses to Joint Intervenors 841108 Motion to Reopen Three QA & Mgt Integrity Contentions for Litigation.Certificate of Svc Encl 1996-08-07
[Table view] |
Text
m u.; me...<..... J.'. . * : '. -4?r-i . a
_. . - h * ' ? = n f ~ " T.". 2, i. . .
Exhibit 1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY. COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARD In the Matter of )
)
LOUISIANA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY ) Docket No. 50-382
)
.(Waterford Steam Electric Station, )
Unit 3) )
)
AFFIDAVIT OF THOMAS M. DEVINE The above, being duly sworn deposes and says:
- 1. My name is Thomas Michael Devine. I am the Legal Director of the Government Accoutability Project (GAP), which provides legal representation to citizen erganizations and employees who challenge illegal, dangerous or wasteful activities either undertaken or ig-nored by the government.
- 2. In July 1983 I drafted three affidavits from witnesses who had worked at the Waterford III nuclear power plant. Two'af-fidavits (Exhibits 12 and 27) were draf ted on the basis of personal interviews. One affidavit (Exhibit 8) was drafted on the basis of.a prior, taped interview between a witness and Mr. John Clewett, an attorney working with GAP. The interview was taped with the witness' knowledge and consent.
, 3. All three witnesses explicitly based their willingness to sign . affidavits on condition that their identities would re- .
main confidential. In my interviews I explained the NRC's con- -
fidentiality policy and the concept of a motion for protective order. I also assured the witnesses that GAP would not publicly 8411130236 841106 PDR ADOCK 05000382 g PDR
e ^
~
- a. ' , , _ ,
. l e : : i m *.*
disclose their identities without their consent. ~
After hea these explanations, both witnesses agreed to sign affidavits.
Ms. Lynne Bemabei of GAP has . informed me that the third witness, the affiant in Exhibit 8, also agreed to sign an affidavit sub-mitted under cover of a Motion for Protective Order.
l 4.
The witnesses both explained to me that they did not want their identities public due to--1) a desire to protect their privacy; and 2) their concerns about retaliation from Louisiana Power and Light (LP &I.) managment, based in one case on the wit-ness' own experience and in another case on the experience of his colleague the third affiant. The perceived retaliation in-i t
cluded harassment, invasion of privacy and in one case termination.
- I have read the above 2 page statement and it is true, t
accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.
l
[.
- ^b ,
Thomas M. Devine Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of ypp,M(1984.
Notary Public K./ h/1A IWFtbmit!ssionentresI %
1 -
l l
s l
e
, w-~v. .y 4-,,-4v,.,_7.-g-m_.y,..-ww..,y. ,,,,,.v..,_,, y, _m_.r--_.m, ga,.,, %-,% , _ , , ,,y_.-w.re,_,. mew,.,,-..
- . . . _ . _ _ . ^ .. ~ ' .. -
2 - - . La. 4 ---- --. .
.' Exhibit 2 e'
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ~
BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARD In the Matter of )
)
LOUISIANA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY ) Docket No. 50-382 OL
)
(Waterford' Steam Electric Station, )
, Unit 3) )
)
PROTECTIVE ORDER Counsel and representatives of the parties to this proceeding who have execute an Affidavit of Non-Disclosure in tho form at-tached shall be permitted to " protected information"1/ upon the following conditions:
- 1. Only counsel and representatives of the parties who have executed an Affidavit of Non-Disclosure may have acces to protected information. All executed Affidavits of Non-Disclosure or copies shall be provided to the Appeal Board and the parties.
2.
Counsel and representatives who receive any protected information (including any documents that contain or otherwise reveal protected information) shall maintain confidentiality as required by the attached Affidavit of Non-Disclosure, the terms of which are hereby incorporated into this protective order.
3.
Counsel and representatives who receive any protected information shall use it solely for the purpose of participation in matters directly pertaining to this proceeding and any further II As used in this order, " protected information" has the same meaning to.
as used in the Affidavit of Non-Disclosure, attached here-
.The provisions of this Protective Order do not apply to Nuclear Regulatory Commission employees; they are subject to in-ternal requirements the treatment (see NRCinformation.
of protscEed Manual Appendix 2101) concerning
-a... - .. - 4+ .e. w m,.e.,,, ,s.
ve, % .= m ,-.a A 6 0,b. bstb...n u,x.ue,*u.E.1 .
4 1
lm proceedings in this case and for no other purposes. Nothing in this protective order, however, shall preclude any party from moving the Appeal Board for the release of particular in-formation for appropriate purposes, such as for use before another adjudicatory body. .
4.
Counsel and representatives shall keep a record of all documents containing protected information in their possession -
and shall account for and deliver that information to counsel for the staff in this proceeding in accordance with the Affi-davit of Non-Disclosure that each has executed.
5.
In addition to the requirements specified in the Affi-davit of Non-Disclosure, all papers filed in this proceeding that contain any protected information shall be segregated and:
(a) served only on the counsel or other representa-tives of each of the parties who have executed an Affidavit of Non-Disclosure; (b) served in a heavy opaque inner envelope bearing the name of the addressee and statement " PRIVATE. TO BE OPENED BY ADDRESSEE ONLY." Addressees shall take all necessary precautions to ensure that they alone will open envelopes so marked.
- 6. Counsel, representatives, or any other individual who has reason to suspect that documents containing proteced informa-tion may have een Jost or misplaced (for example, because an .
expected paper has not been received), or that protected in-formation has otherwise become available to unauthorized persons,
. . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - . _ _ _ _ , . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . . _ _ . . ~ _ _ _ . . - ,
..n~.. _ .a -
. . .= 2:.L., .LC d: w .._..
c.
6.
I shall use portected information only for the purpose of preparation, including any investigations which may be neces-sary, for this proceeding or any further proceedings in this -
case dealing with quality assurance and quality control issues, and for no other purpose. *
- 7. I will avoid disclosure of protected information to the best of my' ability. However, it must be recognized that in the i course of conducting investigations in connection with this pro-caeding,' certain protecced information may be independently discerned incident to that investigation which might result in the inadvertent disclosure of protected information.
- 8. I shall keep a record of all protected information in my possession, including any copies of that information made by or for me. At the conclusion of this proceeding, I shall account t to the Appeal Board or to a Commission employee designated by that Board for all the papers or other materials containing protected information in my possession and deliver them as pro-
. _vided herein. When I have finished using the protected informa-tion they contain, but in no event later than the conclusion of this proceeding, I shall deliver those papers and materials to the Appeal Board (or to a commission employee designated by the i
Board), together with all notes and data which contain protected information for safekeeping until further order of the Board.
1 l
subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 1983.
Notary Public
_ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ . - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ n __ . _ _ _ . _ _ - , _ . - _ . . , _ _ . _ _ __
...--~.,...x..,
.a
,z : .
~. ..a -
~ u-
- .'. -, = . - . . 2
' . .:.n s
&:=u -
J L.m .' % .- . ..
., Exhibit 3 AFFIDAVIT OF NON-DISCLOSURE-I,
,, being duly sworn, state:
- 1. As used in this Affidavit of Non-Disclosure, (a) " protected information" is (1) information revealed in connection with in camera hearings in the Waterford operating license proceeding, including particularly the names of and identi-
, fying facts about in camera witnesses, and any other related in-i
, formation, particularly documents, specifically designated by the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board (" Appeal Board") ,
or (2) any information obtained by virtue of these proceedings which is not otherwise a matter of public record and which deals with the in camera hearings.
(b) An " authorized person" is a person who, at the P
invitation of the Appeal Board, has executed a copy of this Affidavit.
- 2. I shall not disclose protected infromation to anyone except an authorized person, unless that information has pre-viously been disclosed in the public record of this proceeding.
4 I will safeguard protected information in written form (in-cluding any portions of transcripts of in camera hearings, filed l testimony or any other documents that contain such information),
so that it remains at all times under the control of an author-ized person and is not disclosed to anyone else. .
- 3. I will not reproduce any protected information by any means without the Appeal Board's express approval or direction.
d
~,e-+---w., w-, ,_ww-,,a,-,,,,-w,,w- +-.mn-+,ow,~,r,--mm---mn,,-m- -n.------ -s-w,, r-m-pc
m..
~
- e c e. c . " 17, .Z ._;,7 7 ..q. f ] i , ] ,; f._ , f, l
,~ ;-
8 So Icng as.I possess protected information, I shall continue to take these precautions until further order of the Appeal Board.
4.
I shall similarly safeguard and hold in confidence any data, notes, or copies of protected information and all other papnes which contain any protected information by means of the following:
(a) My use of the protected information shall be made at a place approved by the Board.
(b) I will keep and safeguard all such material in a locked facility approved by the Board.
(c)- Any secretarial work performed at my request or under my supervision will be performed at the above location by one secretary of my designation. I shall furnish the Board and parties an appropriate resume of my secretary's background and experience.
(d) All mailings by me involving protected informa-tion shall be made by me directly to the United States Postal l Service or by personal delivery.
- 5. If I prepare papers containing prc~ected information ;
in order to participate in further proceedings in this case, I will assure that any secretary or other individual who must i
receive protected information in order to help me prepare those '
l papers has executed an affidavit like this one and has agreed .!
to abide by its terms. Copies of any such affidavit will be filed with and accepted by the Appeal Board before I reveal any protected information to any such person.
l i
. ... . . . . . . _ . . . . .. - . . u . . . :- .
- a. . l. , - . . . . .
o shall notify this Board promptly of those suspicions and the reasons for them.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4 J
W' s
f i
i 3
4 i
e