ML20077N081
| ML20077N081 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Limerick  |
| Issue date: | 09/01/1983 |
| From: | AUTOMATIC SWITCH CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20077N044 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8309120508 | |
| Download: ML20077N081 (255) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:- REVCRENCC 8 l
\
l t Automatic Switch CU. ; ( ASCA. Solenoid Valves Air Operated Valves Air Control Components Pressure Switches Temperature Switches Emergency Power ! Control Systems AO OOO 2 A PDR I ( g NO N dlliOmQilt Switch Co. FLORHAM PARK, NEW JERSEY 07932 .
FOREWORD This report summarizes the results of a test program, jointly financed by Automatic Switch Company (ASCO) and Westinghouse Electric Corporation, which demonstrates generic qualification of a family of ASCO (Catalog NP-1) solenoid valves for safety-related applications in light water reactor nuclear power generating stations. All test data pertaining to this qualification program is on file at Automatic Switch Company, Florham Park, New Jersey, and is ( available for customer perusal. Many of the ASCO Catalog NP-1 generic valve f amilies included in this qualification program were previously qualified for safety-related nuclear applications as outlined in ASCO Test Report No. AQS-21678/TR, Rev. A. In many cases, this qualification program is applicable to ASCO Catalog NP-1 valve constructions previously supplied as qualified by AQS-21678/TR, Rev. A testing and demon-strates a generally nigher level of generic qualification which satisfies the latest issued requirements and standards.
)
' CONTENTS SECTION
- 1. Introduction..................................... 1
! 2. Scope............................................ 3
- 3. Equipment Description............................ 4
- 4. Test Program Procedures and Results.............. 8 4.1. Agi ng Simul atio n Ph ases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 4.1.1. Thermal Agi ng Simul at ion. . . . . . . . . . . 8 4.1.2. We ar Agi ng Simul ation. . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 4.1.3. Pressurization Aging Simulation... 14 4.1.4. Radi at ion Agi ng Simul ation . . . . . . . . 15 4.1.5. Vi brat ion Agi ng Simul at ion. . . . . . . . 15 l 4.1.6. Seismic Aging (0BE) Simulation and Resonance Testing............. 17 4.2. Design Basis Event (DBE) Phases........... 19 4.2.1. Seismic DBE (SSE) Simulation...... 19 l
t 4.2.2. R adi at io n DB E Simul ation . . . . . . . . . . 21 l 4.2.3. Environmental DBE Simuir on...... 22 4.3. Baseline Testing.......................... 23 4.4. Post Test Visual Inspection of Test Items.....................................24 f 5. Summary of Program Results & Conclusions........ 56 e l l L
FIGURES FIGURE PAGE 4.1 Actual Temperature / Pressure Profile for Grou p I LOC A/HELB Simul ation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 4.2 Actual Temperature / Pressure Profile for Group I I LOC A/HELB Simul at ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 5.1 Qualified Ambient Temperature Profile Demonstrated by the Combined LOCA/HELB Simulation........................................63 TABLES TABLE PAGE ( 3.1 Identification of Generic Families Inc'uded in this Qualification Program.......................................... 4 3.2 Identification of Test Items Included i n thi s Qu ali fi catio n. Progr am. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 4.1 Summary of Seismic DBE (SSE) Test Results....... 27 4.2-4.15 Baseline Test Summaries (Valves #1-#14) . . . . . . . 28-55 5.1 Summary of Qualification Program Results........ 59 5.2 Summary of Major Test Parameters and Qu ali fi c ation Level s Demons tr ated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 ( ' 4 * . , - - - - - - , ,--,-.4- - - - - - - - . - , , , , - - - - - - - . - - - - . - - . - , - - - - , . , .
)
APPENDICES APPENDIX A Asco Qualification Specification AQS-21680/Rev. C B Activation Energy Values for ASCO Catalog NP-1 Valve Components C Component Repl acement and Maintenance of ASCO Catalog NP-1 Valves D Isomedix letters of Certification for Radiation Exposures E Margin F Method Used for Selection of the Qualification Test Items G ASCO Instrumentation Lists H Supplementary Testing of Metal Seating Bulletin 206-380, 206-381, 206-832, 208-266, 208-448,and 210-036 Valves I Qualification Testing Conducted on Two ASCO Catalog NP-1 Valves to Demonstrate Extended Replacement Periods for Solenoid Coils J Test Valve Performance K Testing of A,SCO Molded Solenoid Coils APPENDIX FIGURES i APPENDIX / FIGURE PAGE l l A/9.1 Seismic Qualification Required Input Motion. . .......A25 A/9.2 Environmental Qualification Parameters for Combined Loss-of-Coolant Accident (LOCA)/High Energy Li ne Break (HELB) Simul ation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A26 l A/9.3 Typical Pi pe Schematic for LOC A/HELB Simul ation. . . . . . A27 i
( APPENDIX FIGURES (CONT'D) PAGE APPENDIX / FIGURE C/1 Maximum Service Periods for Ethylene Propylene Terpolymer (EPDM) Elastomeric Components in ASCO Catalog NP-1 Valves. . . . . . . . . . .C5 C/2 Maximum Service Periods for Viton Elastomeric Components in ASCO Catalog NP-1 Valves (Ex-cept Bulletin NP8316 Viton Diaphragms - See Figure 3)....................................C6 C/3 Maximum Service Periods ivr Viton Diaphragms in Bulletin NP8316 ASCO Catalog NP-1 Valves......C7 C/4 Maximum Service Periods for Solenoid Coils i n ASCO C at al og NP-1 V al ves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .C8 ( APPENDIX TABLES PAGE APPENDIX / TABLE A/9.1 Identification of Test Valves....................A23 F/1 Distribution of Common Technically Signi-ficant Design Parameter Variations in Qualification Test Items.........................F6 H/1 B a s e l i n e T e s t S umm ar y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . H7 I/1 Baseli ne Te st Summ ary ( V alv e #15 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I8 Baseline Test Summary (Valve #16)............... 19
,I/2 J/1 Summary of Test V alve Perf ormance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .J1 J/2 Acceptable Acceleration Levels Demonstrated by the Seismi c DBE (SSE) Simul ation. . . . . . . . . . . . . .J4 K/1 B aseli ne Te st Summ ary (V alve #17 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .K9 K/2 Baseline Test Summary (Valve #18)................K10
( 1
i REPORT ON QUALIFICATION OF , AUTOMATIC SWITCH CO. (ASCO) ) CATALOG NP-1 SOLEN 0ID VALVE 5 FOR SAFETY-RELATED APPLICATIONS IN NUCLEAR POWER GENERATING STATIONS )
- 1. INTRODUCTION:
Nineteen Automatic Switch Co. (ASCO) Catalog NP-1 valves were subjected to a qualification test program in accordance with ASCO Qualificatien Specification No.. AQS-21680/Rev. C (Appendix A l to this report). This program was conducted to verify the integrity and reliability of ASCO Catalog NP-1 solenoid valves l when used in typical normal and abnormal nuclear power plant environments and to demonstrate their ability to perform a typical safety function during or following a postulated Design Basis Event (DBE) which might occur at any time during the installed life of the valves. Fourteen of the nineteen ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves tested were included to represent the eight generic valve f amilies identified in Section 3. The remaining five valves tested were included in the program for the following reasons: two were included to evaluate the suitability of a new ASCO molded solenoid coil I design for safety-related nuclear applications, two were l 1' included to determine if the. qualified life of the solenoid coils presently utilized in ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves can be extended beyond the limits demonstrated by the qualification testing performed on the fourteen valves which represent the eight generic families identified in Section 3 and one additional valve was added af ter the start of the test program to d emon str at e qualification of the design modifications made
- 1. INTRODUCTION: -continued-208-448 206-380, 206-381, 206-832, 208-266, to improve Bulletin Specific references and 210-036 metal seating constructions.
and data pert ai ni ng to these five additional valves are not included in the main body of this report but are included, Specifically, the testing of in the appendices to this report. the molded solenoid coils is summarized in Appendix K to this report, the testing to extend the qualified life of solenoid coils is summarized in Appendix I to this report and the testing conducted to demonstr ate qualification of the improved metal seating construction is summarized in Appendix H to this report. The qualification test program consisted ofwear, a series of six pressuriza- [ sequential aging simulation phases (thermal, tion, r adi at i on , vibration and seismic OBE aging s imul at i on) followed by three sequential design basis event (DBE) s imul a-tion phases (seismic SSE, radiation and environmental DBE In addition, a resonance search was conducted simul ation) . during the seismic OBE aging s imul at ion and baseline After testing was conducted periodically throughout the test program. the completion of all required testing, the test v.alve s were disassembled and visually inspected for component degradation caused by the various program exposure environments. Testing was conducted during the period from September, 1980 Thermal aging s imul at i on , wear aging through June, 1981. C.
- 1. INTRODUCTION: -continued-simulation, pressurization aging simulation, baseline testing and the post test visual inspection were conducted at the f acilities of Automatic Switch Co., Florham Park, New Jersey.
Radiation aging simulation and radiation DBE simulation were conducted at the facilities of Isomedix, Inc., Parsippany, New Jersey. Vibration aging simulation, seismic aging (0BE) simulation, seismic DBE (SSE) s imul at ion and resonance testing were conducted at the facilities of Acton Environmental Testing Corp., Acton, Massachusetts. Environmental DBE simulation was conducted at the f acilities of Wyle Laboratories, Huntsville, Alabama. l l
- 2. SCOPE:
This program was conducted in accordance with ASCO Qualifica-tion Specification No. AQS-21680/Rev. C (Appendix A to this report) which was written to comply with the suggestions and requirements contained in the following documents: A. IEEE 323-1975 "IEEE Standard for Qualifying Class IE Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations". B. IEEE 344-1975 "IEEE Recommended Practices for Seismic Qualification of Class IE Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations". C. IEEE 382-1980 (Revision of IEEE 382-1972) "IEEE Standard for Qualification of Safety-Related Valve Actuators" D. IEEE 627-1980 "IEEE Standard for Design Qualification of Safety Systems Equipment Used in Nuclear Power Generat-ing Stations".
- 2. SCOPE: -continued-
. The specific test parameters used in this qualification program were selected by ASCO to envelop known ASCO customer require-ments and typical known or postulated nuclear power pl ant service conditions which are applicable to and compatible with ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves.
- 3. EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION:
The fourteen valves identified in Table 3.2 were selected as test items in this qualification program to represent the eight generic valve families in Table 3.1 below. A complete descrip-tion of each generic family and a tabulated listing showing all specific ASCO valve catalog numbers and options available in each designated generic f amily are included in Appendix AI to AQS-21680/Rev. C (Appendix A to this report). The method used for selection of the 14 test items is described in Appendix F to this report. TABLE 3.1 IDENTIFICATION OF GENERIC FAMILIES INCLUDED IN THIS QUALIFICATION PROGRAM GENERIC FAMILY CATALOG NP-1 VALVE DESIGNATION BULLETIN 5 INCLUDED IN GENERIC FAMILY VDSS 3.1 206-380, 206-381 206-832, 208-266 208-448 & 210-036 VDSS 3.2 NP8314 VDSS 3.3 NP8316 VDSS 3.4 ' NP8317 VDSS 3.5 MP8320 VDSS 3.6 NP8321 VDSS 3.7 NP8323 VDSS 3.8 NP8344 l l l
TABLE 3.2 l IDENTIFICATION OF TEST ITEMS INCLUDED IN THIS QUALIFICATION PROGRAM TEST GENERIC VALVE VALVE NO. FAdILY CATALOG NO. DESCRIPTION 1 VDSS 3.1 210-036-lF AC, Class 'H' leaded coil, steel body, ex- ,
, plosion proof / watertight solenoid enclosure, normally closed, 3-way construction with l
ethylene propylene elastomers and metal seating 2 VDSS 3.1 K206-380-3RVF AC, Class 'H' screw terminal coil, brass body, i watertight solenoid enclosure, normally closed, Y
~
3-way construction with Viton elastomers and resilient seating. 3 VDSS 3.1 206-381-6RF DC, Class 'H' leaded coil, brass body, ex-plosion proof / watertight solenoid enclosure, normally closed, 3-way construction with ethylene propylene elastomers and resilient seating. 4 VDSS 3.3 NP831655E AC, Class 'H' leaded coil, explosion proof / watertight solenoid enclosure, normally closed, 3-way construction with ethylene propylene elastomers. 5 VDSS 3.3 NPK8316A74V DC, Class 'H' screw terminal coil, water-tight solenoid enclosure, normally closed, 3-way construction with Viton elastomers.
m m .m TABLE 3.2. -continued-TEST GENERIC VALVE VALVE' FAMILY CATALOG NO. DESCRIPTION 6 VDSS.3.3 WJNP8316E34E DC, Cl as s ' H' leaded coil, watertight splice box solenoid enclosure, normally closed, 3-way construction with ethylene propylene elastomers. 7 VDSS 3.5 NP8320A185V AC, Cl as s 'H' leaded coil, brass body, explosion proof / watertight solenoid enclosure, normally closed, 3-way construction with Viton , elastomers. p 8 VDSS 3.5 NP832063E DC, Class 'H' leaded coil, stainless steel body, watertight solenoid enclosure, normal-ly closed, 3-way construction with ethylene propylene elastomers. 9 VDSS 3.6 NP8321A2V DC, Class 'H' leaded coil, watertight solenoid enclosure, normally closed, 3-way constuction with Viton elastomers. 10 " VDSS 3.7 NP8323A38V Solenoid 'A' AC, Solenoid 'B' DC, Cl ass 'H' leaded coils, explosion proof / watertight solenoid enclosures, normally closed, 3-way construc-tion with Viton elastomers. 11 VDSS 3.8 NP8344A70V AC, Class 'H' leaded coil, watertight solenoid enclosure, 4-way, single solenoid construction with Viton elastomers.
1 TABLE'3.2 -continued-TEST GENERIC VALVE VALVE NO. FAMILY CATALOG NO. DESCRIPTION 12 VDSS 3.8 NP8344868E DC, Class 'H' leaded coils, explosion proof / watertight solenoid enclosures, 4-way dual solenoid construction with ethylene propylene elastomers. 13 VDSS 3.2 NP8314C28V DC, Class 'H' leaded coil, explosion proof / i watertight solenoid enclosure, normally 7 closed, 3-way construction with Viton elastomers and metal upper seat. 14 VDSS 3.4 NP8317A29V DC, Class 'H' leaded coil, explosion proof / watertight solenoid enclosure, normally closed, 3-way construction with Viton elastomers. 1
j l ( 4. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULTS: The 14 test items described in Section 3 were constructed using normal ASCO Catalog NP-1 valve manuf acturing methods in accord-ance with standard ASCO Catalog NP-1 valve assembly and inspec-tion procedures. Following a visual inspection which verified that the valves had not suffered any damage in handling subse-quent to manufacture, the valves were subjected to initial baseline testing (refer to Section 4.3 for baseline test results) followed by the qualification test phases as described below. 4.1. Aging Simulation Phases: The aging portion of the qualification test pr og r am consisted of six sequential aging phases which were ( designed to simulate the most severe expected levels of all potentially degrading conditions associated with Consideration was given, normal and abnormal service. during the determination of aging p ar ame t e'r s , to ASCO recommendations, as Catalog NP-1 valve maintenance outlined in Appendix C to this report, wherein ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves may require, depending on actual service conditions, periodic replacement of solcnoid coils or elastomeric valve componments during the installed life period of the valves. 4.1.1. Thermal Aging Simulation: Following the successful completion of preliminary baseline testing, the test valves were installed 1 1 I
- 4. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULTS:
4.1.1. Thermal Aging Simul ation: -;;ontinued- ) in a laboratory oven and subjected to thermal aging simulation in accordance with Section 9.4.1 of AQS-21680/Rev. C (Appendix A to this report). Provisions were included in the test set-up such th at all valves could be energized and cycled as I required in Section 9.4.1 of AQS-21680/Rev. C using nominal voltage from controlled AC and DC voltage supplies and such that all valves could be pressurized with gaseous nitrogen at each valve's maximum operating pressure differential as listed in Appendix AI to AQS-21680/Rev. C (except l Valves #13 and #14 which were pressurized at
)
5 psi above their listed maximum operating pressure differential for set-up convenience). The thermal aging simulation consisted of exposure of the test valves to a minimum temperature of 250*F for a minimum period of 18-1/4 days (36-1/2 days for solenoid coils). This a:celerated aging period was designed to simulate a minimum period of 8 years in a continuous ambient temperature of 140*F. The accelerated thermal aging period was l determined by use of the Arrhenius c al cul at io n presented in Section 9.4.1 of AQS-21680/Rev. C. 9 6 1
- 4. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULTS:
4.1.1. Thermal Aging Simulation: -continued-The activation energy value used in this Arrhenius calculation (0.94 eV) represents the lowest activation energy value determined for any of the critical nonmetallic components cont ai ned in ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves. Appendix B to this report lists the activation energy values deter-mine for ASCO Catalog NP-1 valve critical compo-nents and outlines the basis for their determi-nation. Since different activation energy values were determine for different ASCO C at al og NP-1 valve critical components, this thermal aging ( simulation actually s imul at ed different periods of service for different C at al og NP-1 valve components at any given ambient temperature. In addition, the actual ambient service temperature, for many Catalog NP-1 valves is less than the 140*F which was simulated. Therefore, the maximum service period for Cat al og NP-1 valve solenoid coils and elastomeric components, may vary considerably depending on actual service conditions. Appendix C to this report,which outlines the specific replacement recommendations for ASCO Catalog NP-1 valve components, indicates the various maximum service periods which have been
' simulated by this thermal aging exposure for various ambient service temperatures.
-11 ,
- 4. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULTS:
)
4.1.1. Thermal Aging Simulation: -continued- - During this thermal aging s im ul at io n , all test valves were subjected to a minimum of 10% of the 20,000 cycles of wear aging as required in Section 9.4.2 of AQS-21680/Rev. C. Specifically, the test valves were operated through 1,900 energized /de-ener-gized cycles during the first 24 hours of the thermal aging simulation followed by an additional 180 energized /de-energized cycles spaced evenly over the remaining portion of the thermal aging simulation for a total of 2,080 energized /de-ener-gized cycles. The rate of cycling was such that the cylinder ports of all valves were fully pres-surized a ri d fully vented during each cycle. The test valves were subjected to the majority of cycling during the first 24 hours of thermal aging simulation since this procedure more closely approximates the actual conditions of operation in a typical nuclear power plant installation, i.e., a typical valve would be subjected to the majority of its cycling soon after installation during initial system checks and plant functional testing and, thereafter, once the plant is in operation, j l would typically only be subjected to a few cycles l I a year during system safety checks. Throughout all of the thermal aging simulation when the test valves were not being cycled, all valves were )
( 4. TESTPROGRAMPROCEDbRESANDRESULTS: 4.1.1. Thermal Aging Simulation: -continued-maintained continuously energized using nomi n al input voltage. Shortly after restart of the thermal aging simula-tion, it was noted that test va'1ve #1 (210-036-lF, 120/60) had developed excessive internal leakage and was not completely venting its cylinder port upon de-energization. Subsequent examination of this valve following its removal from the thermal aging test set-up showed that mechanical binding between the disc and the seat of this metal seated construction was the cause of the malfunction ( which occurred. Qualification tesing of this valve was not continued following this occurrence. I l Refer to Appendix H to this report for additional information in connection with this occurrence. A list of instrumentation used during the thermal
- aging, simul ation with applicable calibration data is included in Appendix G to this report.
4.1.2. Wear Aging Simulation: Upon completion of the thermal aging simul ation as described above, the 13 test valves (test item numbers 2-14) were subjected to the remaining required wear aging simulation as described in Section 9.4.2 of AQS-21680/Rev. C (Appendix A to
- 4. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULTS: )
4.1.2. Wear Aging Simulation: -continued-this report). This portion of the wear aging simul ation was conducted at room ambient tempera-ture using the same test set-up that was used for the thermal aging simulation described in Section 4.1.1 above. Specifically, the test valves were subjected to an additional 18,020 energized /de-ener-gized cycles using a gaseous nitrogen supply, at the same valve maximum operating pressure differen-tials as used for the thermal aging simul ation, by application of nominal yoltage. The valves were operated at a rate of eight energized /de-ener-gized cycles per minute which allowed full pres-surization and venting of all valve cyclinver ports during each cycle. This cycling, together with the cycling included in the thermal aging simulation, resulted in a minimum of 20,100 energized /de-energized wear aging cycles on al l valve components. At the completion of this aging I phase, the 13 test valves were removed from the thermal / wear aging s imul at i on set-up and were l l F l
t ( 4. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULTS: Wear Aging Simulation: -continued-4.1.2. subjected to baseline testing (Ref: Section 4.3). A list of instrumentation used during the wear aging simulation with applicable calibration data is included in Appendix G to this report. 4.1.3. Pressurization Aging Simulation: Upon completion of the post wear aging simul ation baseline testing, the 13 test valves (test item numbers 2-14) were subjected to pressurization aging simulation in accordance with Section 9.4.3 of AQS-21680/Rev. C (Appendix A to this report). Specifically, the test valves, in two groups, were placed in a test chamber and subjected to 15 ( atmospheric to 80 psig (+2 psig -0 psig) ambient The first cycle had a pressurization cycles. minimum dwell period of 24 hours at 80 psig and the 14 successive cycles had a minimum dwell Pipe period of 3 minutes each at 80 psig. plugs were installed in the pressure ports and cylinder ports of all valves since, during contain-ment pressurization in actual service, ambient pressure would not enter the valves through these ports. All valves were maintained de-energized during this simulation. A list of instrumentation used during pressurization aging simul ation ,with applicable calibration dat a is included in Ap-( pendix G to this report.
- 4. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULTS: -continued-4.1.4. Radiation Aging Simulation: I I Following completion of the pressurization aging simulation, the 13 test valves (test item numbers 2-14) were delivered to Isomedix Inc. and subjected to radiation aging simulation as described in Section 9.4.4 of AQS-21680/Rev. C (Appendix A to this report). Specifically, the radiation aging s im ul at io n consisted of exposure of the test valves to a cobalt-60 source of gamma radiation with an average gamma energy of 2.5 MeV at an average rate of 0.71 megarad per hour until a minimum actual air equivalent dose of 23 megarads was received. Pipe plugs were installed in the pressure and cylinder ports of the test valves and I unplugged street elbows were installed in the exhaust port s of each valve in order to s imul at e actual installation conditions. The vaives were maintained de-energized during this s imu l at io n .
Documentation supplied by Isomedix Inc. for this simulation, including instrumentation data, is included in Appendix D to this report. At the completion of the radiation aging s imul at ion, the valves were returned to Automatic Switch Company and subjected to baseline testing (Ref: Section 4.3). 4.1.5. Vibration Aging Simulation:
' Following completion of the post radiation aging )
1 I ( 4. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULTS: 4.1.5. Vibration Aging Simulation: -continued-simulation baseline testing, the 13 test valves (test item numbers 2-14) were delivered to Acton Environmental Testing Corp. and subjected to the required vibration aging simulation as outlined in Section 9.4.5 of AQS-21680/Rev. C (Appendix A to this report). Specifically, the test valves, in four groups, with solenoids (or solenoid 'A' for Valve #10) upright, were rigidly mounted, using standard valve mouunting provisions, to an electrodynamic shaker table and were exposed to a sweeping continuous ( sinusoidal input motion having an acceleration level of 0.75g (except a't low frequencies where the acceleration level was reduced such that the displacement did not exceed 0.025" double amplitude). The frequency was continually swepi during this exposure from 5 to 200 to 5 Hz at a rate of 2 octaves per minute for 90 minutes in each of three orthogonal axes. Throughout the vibration i aging simulation, each valve (except Valve #11) was pressurized, using gaseous nitrogen, to its maximum operating pressure differential as listed in Appendix AI of AQS-21680/Rev. C. Valve #11 was
, tested without pressure applied since the gaseous
( . nitrogen supply system available at Acton Environ-ment al Testing Corp. h ad inadequate volume to
- 4. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULTS:
4.1.5. Vibration Aging Simulation: -continued-maintain the required inlet pressure on this valve. The test valves were alternately de-ener-gized or energized (using nominal input voltage) approximately every 15 minutes thorughout this phase of aging. A list of instrumentation used . during vibration aging simulation with a ppl i c ab le calibration data is included in Appendix G to this report. 4.1.6. Seismic Aging (OBE) Simulation and Resonance Testing: Following the completion of the vibration aging simulation, the 13 test valves (Test Item numbers 2-14) were subjected to seismic aging (0BE) simulation and resonance testing at Acton Environ-me nt al Testing Corp. in accordande with Section 9.4.6 of AQS-21680/Rev. C (Appendix A to this report). The OBE simulation consisted of exposure of e ac h of the test valves to two sinusoidal sweeps in each of three orthogonal axes. The required sweeping was performed in two separate steps; from 8 to 35 to 8 Hz at a sweep rate of I octave per minute on an electrodynamic shaker and from 1 to 8 to 1 Hz at a sweep rate of I oc t av e per minute on a hydraulic shaker. The table input during the OBE simulation had the following
. - . ,r_ _._,.._m . ,. _. - , , - - . - . , . -
( 4. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULTS: Seismic Aging (0BE) Simulation and Resonance Testing: 4.1.6.
-continued-characteristics:
From 1 to 2 Hz............. 6" displacement (double amplitude) Hz........... 4" per second From 2 to 4.3 velocity Hz....... 3g acceleration From 4.3 Hz to 35 The valves were mounted as described in Section 4.1.5 above and were pressurized using gaseous nitrogen at each valve's maximum operating pressure differential as listed in Appendix AI of AQS-21680/ Rev. C (except Valve fil which was again tested without pressure applied as described in Section ( One of the sweeps in each orthogonal 4.1.5 above). axis was conducted with the valves de-energized and the second sweep in each axis was conducted with the valves energized at n omi n al v o l t'ag e (except Valve #12 which was tested with only Solenoid 'A' energized during one sweep in each axis and with only Solenoid 'B' energized during During this the second sweep in each axis). testing, accelerometers were attached to the solenoids of e ac h test valve to determine if any of the test valves exhibited resonance. Test Valve numbers 2 14 exhibited no resonance Resonance, for the during this phase of testing. ( purpose of this testing, is defined as a response 1
4. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULTS: I 4.1.6. Seismic Aging (0BE) Simulation and Resonance Testing:
-continued-with a magnitude of acceleration at least twice as great as the input acceleration.
The valves were separated into several groups for this testing and the required seismic OBE (SSE) simulation was conducted in each axis following the completion of the above described testing in that axis. A list of instrumentation used during this phase of testing.with applicable c alib rat io n data is included in Appendix G to this report. 4.2. Design Basis Event (DBE) Phases: The design basis event portion of the qualification test I program consisted of three sequential exposure phases which were designed to simulate the most severe expected levels of all potentially degrading conditions associated with postulated accident environments. 4.2.1. Seismic DBE (SSE) Simulation: Following completion of the aging s mulation phases, the 13 test valves (test item numbers 2-14) were subjected to seismic OBE (SSE) testing at Acton Environmenal Testing Corp. in accordance with Section 9.S.1 of AQS-21680/Rev. C (Appendix A
)
( 4. _ TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULTS: 4.2.1. Seismic DBE (SSE) Simulation: -continued-to this report). The SSE simulation was designed to demonstrate qualification of ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves to the seismic conditions which are postulated for pipe mounted valves as a result of the dynamic response of a typical piping system during an SSC. This testing consisted of expo-sure of the test valves, in each of three orthog-onal axes, to a series of single frequency single axis sine beat tests at 38 interval test frequen-cies between 1 and 35 Hz. The input excitation was in the form of a continuous series of sine ( beats with 12-15' oscillations per beat and successive beats were phased such that there was not any superposition of response motion. The valves were mounted as described in Section 4.1.5 above and were pressurized using gaseous nitrogen at each valve's maximum operating pressure differential as listed in Appendix AI of AQS-21680/ { Rev. C (except Valve fil which was again tested without pressure applied as described in Section 4.1.5 above). At each test frequency, input acceleration levels were determined at all points j where the cylinder port pressure changed by 0, 5 and 10% of the nominal value (zero when de-energized ( _ and full inlet pressure when energized for a i
. 4. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULTS:
I 4.2.1. Seismic DBE (SSE) Simulation: -continued-normally closed valve, opposite for a normally open valve). This 10% change in cylinder port ! pressure fragility level was selected by ASCO as being insufficient to cause spurious shifting of a typical main va1ve or other device. The peak - acceleration at each test frequency was either 15g, the point where a 10% change in cylinder port pressure occurred, or the machine limita-tions, whichever was less. Table 4.1 indicates the actual g-level values determined for each test valve and Table 5.2 indicates the accept able g-level values (actual test results reduced by 10% to satisfy margin requirements) that were determined for each of the valves tested. At the i completion of this seismic test phase, the 13 test valves were returned to ASCO and were subjected to baseline testing (Ref: Section 4.3) A list of instrumentation used during this phase of testing with ap pl ic ab le calibration data is included in Appendix G to this report. 4.2.2. Radiation DBE Simulation: l Following completion of the seismic DBE (SSE) simulation, the 13 test valves (Test Item Numbers 2-14) were delivered to Isomedix Inc. and subjected to radiation DBE simulation in accordance with
- l
( 4. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULTS: 4.2.2. Radiation DBE Simulation: -continued-Section 9.5.2 of AQS-21680/Rev. C (Appendix A to this report). Specifically, the radiation DBE simulation consisted of exposure of the test volves to a cobalt-60 source of gamma radiation with an average gamma energy of 2.5 MeV at an average rate of 0.90 megarads per hour until a minimum actual air equivalent dose of 182 megarads was received. Pipe plugs were installed in the pressure and cylinder ports of the test valves and unplugged street elbows were installed in the exhaust ports of each valve in order to simulate ( actual installation conditions. The valves'were maintained de-energized during this simulation. At the completion of the radiation DBE simulation, the valves were returned to ASCO and subjected to baseline testing (Ref: Section 4.3). Documenta-tion supplied by Isomedix Inc. for this simul ation, including instrumentation data, is included as Appendix D to this report. 4.2.3. Environmental DBE Simulation: Following completion of the post radiation DBE simulation baseline testing, the 13 test valves (Test Items Numbers 2-14) were delivered to Wyle Laboratories and subjected to environmental ( , DBE simulation in accordance with Section 9.5.3 of AQS-21680/Rev. C (Appendix A to this report).
e l
- 4. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULTS:
) i 4.2.3. Environmental DBE Simulation: -continued-Specifically, the valves, in two groups, were installed in a pressure chamber and subjected to a 30-day exposure to steam, chemical spray and clear water spray simulating a combined loss-of-coolant accident /high-energy line break event and post-event cool-down. Figures 4.1 and 4.2 indicate the actual temperature / pressure profiles )
for the two test groups. Test Item No.'s 2, 5, l 7, 9, 10, ll, 13 and 14 were included in the
. i r s t group (Figure 4.1) and Te'st Item No.'s 3, 4, 6, 8 & 12 were included in the second group (Figure 4.2). During this testing, several anomalies were noted. Appendix J. Table 1, Summary of Test Valve Performance, describes each. A list of instrumentation used during this phase of testing with applicable calibration data is included in Appendix G to this report.
Following completion of the environmental DBE simulation, the valves were returned to ASCO and subjected to a final baseline test (Ref: Section 4.3) followed by disassembly and a visual inspec-tion of al l valve components (Ref: Section 4.4) 4.3. Baseline Testing: At various points throughout the test program, the test v alve s ' were subjected to baseline testing to determine I
- 4. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULTS:
4.3. Baseline Testing: -continued-the condition of the test valves and for comparison with performance at other stages of the test program. Specifi-c al ly, baseline testing was performed prior to the start of thermal aging, following the completion of wear aging, following the completion of radiation aging, following the completion of seismic DBE simulation, following the completion of radiation DBE simulation and following the completion of environmental DBE simulation. The results of this testing are summarized in Tables 4.2 thru 4.15. 4.4. Post Test Visual Inspection of Test Items: Following completion of all required testing, the 13 test valves (Test Items #2-14) were disassembled and visually inspected for evidence of degradation resulting from the exposure environments of this test program. Valve components were found to be either in good condition considering their prior environmental exposure or in a condition consistent with the performance of the valve at the end of the test program, o l l l l
c440*F/42PS/S f 433'l34PS/G (420*F/24PS/G 4487/ SOPS /G 430*F/SOPSG -444'F/40PS/6 Soo- - 420*F/54PS/G 343*F/32PS/6 i 3727//6PS/G 3S0*fl44PS/G
#*} , 34S'F/22P.S/6 345'Fl38fS/6
,Q 34OY//4PS/G 328'F/30PSM
- 3/0'F/48PS/G
, 3go ~ 280*F/)T4PS/G l (
% 30o-5
~
403*F/28PS/G j l 24S*fl2/PS/6 h 4237/34PS/G \
\
i 250 -
- 3/5'F/2EPS/GJ k N e
} : 34S*Fl22PS/G 200 -- ISO { / /40'F/0PS/G L CLEAR WATER SPRAY CHEM / CAL srRAY CHEMX4L SPRAY , I I I I I I I I I I I ill I I I I II l l l I I I I I I I l l l l l I I Il l l I o ro 40 2 4 to 12 3 5 6 10 40234 1012 9 12 242345 to 20 30 - j -SEC MINUTES-y HoVRS SEC--MINUTES HOURS DAYS ! T/ME l ACTUAL TEMPMATUM/PRESSUM PAMWETERS FOEGROUPZLOCAlA'ELB S/MULAT/0Al l RGURE 4. /
J
-asyro,sia 7aovseesiG s22wsesu -sesyscesia 500z \ 4do'f/64PS/G f 448'F/44Ps/G 3a0'fl20PS/G
- -436'fl68Ps/G l 3807/56Ps/G
-3$8'fl54 PS/G 450 5 A r agogaaesa E
"0 [sosyarsis psisr/ierais
, ? ce -
t ,,a i l 2sse/uesis k i 359/42'sta l 353ya,siG R300- \ , E aserpsesia i 385"Pl20es/G \ l 250-- 200-- CLEAR WATEK SPPAY - l50 y /40'Ff0 Ps/G'N ' chemical SPEAY cHrwat IOO I I I I SPRAY I I I I I I15 I i 9 i 1 Ii il I242345 12 I I I I I I I I toI I I I I20I I I III30 I I O 10 40 241012 3SG 1040234/0/2 i!Ours - - DAYS l l yarcyMtNuTES - l HOURS - lSECkwmTESl T/ME ACTUAL TEMPEK470RE/ PRESSURE B4PAMETERS FO F/GURE'4.2
. l l
)
TABLE 4.1
SUMMARY
OF SEISMIC 08E (SSE) TEST RESULTS TEST ITEM NO. VALVE DESCRIPTION ACCEPTABLE ACCELERATION LEVEL (I) DE-ENERGIZED ENERGIZED 2 K206-380-3RVF, AC 8.0g 3 15g(2) 206-381-6RF, DC 4 3.59 15g(2) NP831655E, AC 15g(2) 5 15g(2) NPK8316A74V, DC 6 12.59 15g(2) WJNP8316E34E, DC 15g(2) 7 15g(2) NP8320A185V, AC 15g(2) 8 15g(2) NP832063E, DC 15g(2) 9 15g(2) { NP8321A2V, DC 15g(2) 15g(2) 10 NP8323A38V, AC/DC 4.6g 6.79 I 11 NP8344A70V, AC (3) (3) 12 NP8344868E, DC 15g(2) 15g(2) 13 NP8314C28V, DC 15g(2) 15g(2) 14 NP8317A29V, DC 15g(2) 15g(2) NOTES: (l) Values reducedindicated to satisfyare actual margin test levels which have not been requirements. for Refer to Appendix J a listing of from this testing. acceptable acceleration levels determined (2) The 159rather testing levels listed indicate the 159 maximum limit of test items. than the maximum acceleration capability of the (3) Acceptable acceleration levels were not determined for this test item since Acton Environmental Testing Corporation had an inadequate required gaseous inlet nitrogen supply system to maintain the pressure.
S (. I 9 l i THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ( (
BASELINE TESTING VALVE SAMPLE N0. 1 TABLE 4.2 ASCO CATALOG NO. Elo-o36-IF TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASCO QUALIFICATION SPECIFICATION AQS-21680 REV 'C' & ASCO TEST PROCEDURE BULLETIN TP-3-04h TEST MEDIUM: GASEOUS NITROGEN
$ h
/ p #'#, ##I+" ##,I+~#fl+'
COIL EXCITATION - AC VOLTSlo2/ WOR DC AMPS .25?. NOTE *ri C0ll DIELECTRIC TEST 91,240 VOLTS e tc. SEAT LEAKAGE ENERGIZED 0 cc /MlW. HIGH PRESSURE 8 0 '2.00 DE-ENERGIZED 47 cc / Meg. SEAT LEAKAGE ENERGIZED o cc/M14. LOW PRESSURE
@ 10 PSIG DE-ENERGIZED oec/sig,
- t. s w e A a.io w s e NOISE TEST onc OPERATIONAL TEST FROM 200 PSIG TO O PSIG o it EXTERNAL LEAKAGE 0100 PSIG MONE (ENERGIZED & DE-ENERGIZED)
INSULATION RESISTANCE > 250o (MEG 0HMS) gyggg ACTIVE C0ll TURNS 3998 1[
.. . -. __ _ ~ _ .. . _ _ _ -
1 I ( .. , l BASELINE TESTING ASCO ALOG h-036-1F NOTES:
~
- 1. Testing was discontinued on this valve following an occurrence during the thermal aging simulation and a new valve was substi-tuted. Refer to Appendix H for additional information.
l C
kg ' . W 4 2 N k , 8 * '$ $ $ t 'o
- 5 $
s
}
d N o
~
o o u o 1
- F 0_ M 8 o i 3
- ko C 2 .o
- m _ 2 J T g 4 0 2 3 8 N I
s = h o o y m 3 0 0 og e N g
,hs) g, O Ab 1 4's4 4 $ 9 g
*/ : *
# {v
=
! s a k l]$ f d b o
o Ah 3 l = #0/ i y D o N - y C J m i 2 2 2 8% E n 5 N O >1
=
c o o 1 ug c E t c 0 ^,g g G ## 2 t UW m
- 49 . y p :
! z
$ EU 42# d -
2 G o1 pe 0
#v m M i M 2 O o I
5t C= 1 0 )v 0 0 { Mg N z E ( i as o ^x 2 ES am
. m
$. #4/ N M i _
M 2 y n8
'o O w
<g N
} 0 0
~
O o Es
- 2 3y y Ei o 5x I Lw-o o l
l hEO mE" W W e e 658 S G S G G ms E 2 5 5 5 "* ' R E e 5 W 5 o SG w g "e m N . s g a w a
=
a - s w \ geh 9 " o *5 5 m i Edo# zE o M" Wa $ E P**M7 S Eo we$ 0 WS 5 0
=
E
$ $ 8 e n. 4;3 Gv ggm3 geSF at 5* a "ge8F te $ ", 5 0;"'! HSE-3 M 1 "S 5- 5 Em%e5 MC d~* bug? 50 ; W SS dt p2 Dw"50 "d "" 3 "20 1 m g~ Ee 58 W '>
W58Md d* du g5_1 32 4 $ wE WW SS C EsEWE SW SW mE.3 mS.O E 85 5$ 55 e o o l
l l C BASELINE TESTING VALVE SAMPLE NO. 2 ASCO CATALOG NO. K206-380-3RVF NOTES:
- 1. External leakage which does not affect ability to perform a typical safety function, was detected at the upper disc guide
{ 2. cap / body joint. External leakage which does not affect ability to perform a typical safety function, was detected at the upper disc guide
. cap / body joint and the solenoid base sub-assembly / body joint.
- 3. The valve was installed in an oven at 250*F for approximately l two days before this reading was taken.
40 m 4 e I f $ m a 4
$ # [9 t i* d d 2 g I t # I O
@ c g. O )I $ M 0 o
$o E
o & o 2 0 -
- o. .
2 0 2 2 2 2
~ ko V C
- i
- s -
- Z
# M k N h b'g N 0 = M o k e
> 3 o
- e 25
. W m
% V 2 I W #
y z kI tu o 2 Jrg g o M O s B
~
3*o i O 1 O 2 7I o o8 28 D.0e m 08 2 6I E a er O E' m i
=
o ##// #F i I
> z W z o 4 C / 4 M s _ M M 2 o bo.
m $ 0 ~ 0 a m F $ 0 .] M $ 2g 0 r
%5a e 39lay hM Y
5 & #f > 5 g l 88 4 t g do $ M g W 02 L.0 !
-=
5t 8 0 v
~
o 0 0 2 0o oe , 0 Ng C* I 2s g ^/ z E 38 0 A2 ' ES .
<g
##*/ 3 i 0
_ d 0 i $ fi$ 3 g 0 o - EE o 7 RI EW gg t w ._ EWO
- e o TE* E- M M e e I -
5 S G S 3 G GB R8 - e e e c = = =
*4 M 5 8 5 E m o $=Gw ~p$3 ido- z5 8
m E E s o E s M" c, -s Wa S
! m E
C**"k ' S Go met a se so e g 058!EF ' 4 G8 OEG MWS sE 5* " s gwS umQe* t et W- sa-)*> sseIA n. "e s- a* WC
- 5W*
"-d 30 W Bn du CE 3m"5b *B {. "Eo v w Ee 58 W gE M58Md d* dM g5 s 2 m WW SS p EE<WE 8e SW mE. ex-)i WS.
o E 88 5$ 55 e o . I i [ l
C BASELINE TESTING VALVE SAMPLE NO. 3 ASCO CATALOG NO. 206-381-6RF NOTES:
- 1. External leakage which does not affect ability to perform a l
l typical safety function, was detected at the end cap / body ( joint.
- 2. A coil insulation breakdown was detected between 100 and 200 volts. Therefore, coil excitation, active coil turns and I
insulation resistance values were not determined for this coil and a new coil was substituted so that baseline tests could be completed. It should be noted that this valve did operate on demand as required throughout all DBE phases of this test program.
. 3. External leakage, which does not affect ability to perform a typical safety function, was detected at the end cap / body joint an.d the lower disc guide cap / body joint.
( - .
i BASELINE TESTING VALVE SAMPLE NO. 4 TABLE 4.5 . ASCO CATALOG NO. AIP851455E ' TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASCO QUALIFICATION SPECIFICATION AQS-21680 REV 'C' & ASCO TEST PROCEDURE
- BULLETIN N P 8 51(o TEST MEDIUM
- GASE0US NITROGEN
$ % g'
~
/ p #I #, ##,*h' #I
#, #g' i COIL EXCITATION j AC VOLTSlot/so0R DC AMPS 147 .147 149 .I49 147 .I48 ,
COIL DIELECTRIC l TEST 91,240 VOLTS o k. om oc og og o ts. SEAT LEAKAGE HIGH PRESSURE ENERGIZED 0 cc/Mid. O cc./Miq. O cc./Miu. o e</ min. o /H N. 7r8 5 0 y j l*15 PSg DE-ENERGIZED 65 se/Ni4. *p50 SCFH SEAT LEAKAGE ENERGIZED o ce/M M. "LOScFM > LOW PRESSURE 9 to PSIG DE-ENERGIZED 180 c4/M'M. 7 50 ScFW sospi.stwr nea'o 9 4 4 i NOISE TEST o w::. og og o g, og cy OPERATIONAL TEST FROM l'15 PSIG T0 to PSIG om onc o nc. om om NOTE +t l EXTERNAL LEAKAGE 9 t M PSIG (ENERGIZED & DE-ENERGlZEU)
*" C '*- Ok CK 08: racTe e- 2 j INSULATION RESISTANCE 2400-2600 >2 coo >2500 y zooo > 2000 gyg goo t
(MEG 0HMS) KMa60HNS kMEdiONM5 tr.MEGoHHs kHE4 OHMS gMesor4MS KME60H S ACTIVE COIL TURNS So4~2. Mor RE4'O MOT Reg'D Nor esq'o Nor greQ'o 3037
( BASELINE TESTING YALVE SAMPLE NO. 4 ASCO CATALOG NO. NP8316 SSE NOTES:
- 1. This valve failed to shift upon de-energization at any pressure in the indicated operating pressure range. It should be noted that this failure was caused by a diaphragm rupture which occurred approximately 24 hours af ter completion of the 30-day environmental DBE simulation af ter the valve had cooled to room temperature with the 175 psig inlet pressure still applied. l Since this valve performed satisfactorily through all DBE phases of the test program, it is considered to have f ully passed this qualification test program.
- 2. External leakage which does not affect ability to perform a-typical safety function, was detected at the solenoid base sub-assembly / body joint.
- 3. The valve was installed in an oven at 250*F for approximately two days before this reading was taken.
L .
80 m d % 5 % M m
'" m )
i 6 6 M = vo 4 # *
- e e o E Eo E E g / g W o o 0 a
2 A 2 2 z T UO E M JV 0/p . . m W 4'
/g 2 1 7 - - N I O 8
/jb _
I
/s* d d
- 5 8 e
=
i i O v V $ )* o g o V O $ o e h3
- gi q
8 g Sr O 0 4 2 2 2 AX 2 u
- J ) 59g*OI/V
. ge 5 s 2 O 8 *I
/#4 > M I W N g p 0 g ; V V 2 I S @m
- O v o g *g a~I L 7 O ~
2 8
- %< op i 8E 0
*9 '5 s >
2 0 4 3 u o v o y o 75 gg [
$E gs o 7 e2u D 2
S= g, %,A > i 8y
- 0 1 E8 SO4 d M ko y S E*
-=
5t o = g 0 2 i9 E P v o og C" 38 o O 2 py
-u 2
o os > 3 gy
~2 m g .. bs% g V o s I V u U -o *
<r e =
1
- e +
ze U O o n a p
$@ o 2 _3
>en 4 75W F S S de 9 e : o = S S-28
- m W e W e E 2S W [W= I' G W G W o ed O 5 T 5 T -
de 0 r
~
4 8 S 5 E 5 E ='E E e . .S g = -R wT a E 5EEbe 5 So wged a 4 Se $8 G g E MweBa C Em mme. g ,.
- dSE2 s SN gasE g EG&;'E - d' So z d wk&*= Gm d <Cmy < 3 C CCBA an SG 8 5*5EC Ob E. $2r e c ~
$e'o 3 M gr EG eE w dWop$ -
oE a- sz 5 55 88 2 WWM$d su 50 SS WE 05 EW b m m . a.5 5 53.3 = > <.-.= u< u- ma 8 = om w- -- < a
( BASELINE TESTING VALVE SAMPLE NO. 5 ASCO CATALOG NO. NPK8316A74V NOTES:
- 1. The minimum voltage required to shift the core on the first operation was 177 volts. After the first operation, 79 volts were required. The valve diaphragms would not shift on the initial operation at any pressure in the indicated range. After the diaphragms were manually freed from the main seats, this valve would only shift to the de-energized position at pres-sures above 40 psig in the indicated pressure range.
- 2. External leakage, which does not affect ability to perform a typical safety function, was detected at the pressure diaphragm body / bonnet joint.
- 3. The coil was found to be open and, therefore, the dielectric
( test results, coil excitation, active coil turns and insulation resistance were not determined. A new coil was substituted so that baseline tests could be completed. The valve would then only shift properly above 15 psig in the indicated range. It should be noted that this valve did operate on demand up to the second day of the environmental DBE simulation and did maintain a de-energized (failsafe) position for the remainder of the 30-day simul ation. .
- 4. External leakage, which does not affect ability to perform a typical safety function, was detected at both body / bonnet joints and at the solenoid base sub-assembly / body joint.
-3 8-J%' I
_ 7 ~ N - W _ g - -
$ s # W d r y 4 .0 I i ,
s s,so &
; c 3 0 D $ !2 N
#4 2 o 4 g 1 m
" e ,
2 0 M 8 0 8 a a
/
e o )V
= v o
v O 2 2
. g, gy M,
<% 4*oisy, * ^u
- Y O
#l NS ks1 1
g e 1 83 .Po 3s e ## 4 8 4 N 0
- k o
M 0 2 Ig =gI S y & h
~
y 0 e3 o 2
- % op i 8i 9a ag "
n5
*5 s 3 x o
2 bV ; V v 0 1 e O O 2 e p mC
'E o O t 0
$ a. nJoy #
z5 # i e )
?? 4 % >
* .2 4 -
y u E alE o ss o o o gd
$g n
0 8 1 el {I su lV i bt. - o6 ~ (, 8
- M .. /414 % i "
M 0 u 0 23
;! e o 3
- 3 *g $
eS o $xz
~
gd$ wiW 9e { . o S c o S c 2 E-8 8 m W 2 W e E ES EW G W G W ed I @z z E p 5 Y 5 Y 0 gg g y w 8 8 $ 8 5 8 ~l RW i e . .Sg =
- R w" G e 5eete E So $ 6 Se g8 3 s*
Mwg 86 C Ec weSu wwe "3 < W Wems2 s e~ gas, gaal - <m s. . a wEs"z Gm dJ' <0 me <$'t 0 ~ E ad SG S 5*5ep Ob E. 52r5> $Wo f CC EG QE w dWop$ se a ,- -z .-
"- 9 W Er l 55 88 E ) ,
50 mz I 55 g 2 om w-l E e M e, =d 50 28 05 EW O S S.g ms.g <
=>< v .c v-
~ . - __ - - ----.-_ - -_ _. - _ _ _ - . . - - _ - _ _ , , . - _ - _ . - _
BASELINE TESTING VALVE SAMPLE NO. 6 ASCO CATALOG NO. WJNP8316E34E NOTES:
- 1. The coil was found to be open and, therefore, the dielectric test results, coil excitation, active coil turns and insulation resistance were not determined. A new coil was substituted so that baseline tests could be completed. It should be noted that this valve did operate on demand up to the 13th day of the environmental DBE simulation and was capable of maintaining a de-energized (failsafe) position for the remainder of the 30-day simulation.
- 2. External leakage, which does not affect ability to perform a typical safety function, was detected at both body / bonnet joints and at the solenoid base sub-assembly / body joint.
i
. - . . . . , - , _ , . m ~ . . , , , _ . _ _
m 2 f i a 9$ - 5 s S i
- mi d 2 I f
- f. ] I O -
o *8'Ioo 'N v 0 0 m
; r,
< t
- 4,o m
- s 1 1 2 1 A 8 J g i s1 i A $o
' E E
j o $ lu g Ng
] o v
i o 0 y cS o E g o e o O gg W} 2g
,hs, 5
- Nsf Sls 5 ul $ 9 8
e 2 Js4 & 2 0 Q O N O 2 o 2 8f o w u p 3 o m[ A 3 e #l 0
= #e 3 g OE
=0
*5-i 0
kv v I 0 Y 0 2 o 02 S8 4= { 2 Z g i $cG # O A 2 1 QW #13p##
=5 4'#4 i E .O
$g $ I jy _
Y 0 M 0
$ 03 8 E 5t 0 -
o me C* o 2 Ny o l Es ^x 2 BW . geT og 7F 7 g _ M .. fj#*/
$ V i .nl 7 7 *o *
*E
- O O O o og *0 i EE o
% 8z N 1 1
, ii E WOM WEW S S te o d o S S-28 m W W W W E ES mv G W G W ed A
- I 12 5 Y 5 Y O ES O o
o . I.Sm=w 8 oc 8 5 8 5 a
.W mT M E
W 52208 5 S -9 - Se g8 mw E Mmg st pg sS m=s mm y m . sems2 s, ea gar- g<g - 5. . a m5s"= Gm de < 0 ol m g 0 E wS ad SG 8 50 E ., $2mg de r* " p- EG EE m 5*5ep$ dWop a2 a ,- -z a , _ " = - M & 55 88 E el E#M$d 50 u< m-su mm 5 5e.g m =mg". om c5 s m-sr <0
BASELINE TESTING VALVE SAMPLE NO. 7 ASCO CATALOG NO. NP8320A185V NOTES:
- 1. The minimum voltage required to shift the core on the first operation was 125/60. After the first operation, the core shifted properly with the 102/60 test voltage applied.
- 2. External leakage, which does not affect ability to perform a typical safety function, was detected at the end cap / body joint and the solenoid base sub-assembly / body joint.
- 3. The valve was installed in an oven at 250*F for approximately two days before this reading was taken.
( .
. e *
,O47 M gT f y g .
b I ge4/ O O ,g t
- d g gN v 0 0 oRd
- B *o/ 0 3 0 -3 o l Q3
- NGO m
81 w s - 1 D e < f 2 u u 8 e # o }I
~
o o go ? a! " e 0 2 1 o
<4,/ 2 0 _x z o
~
~ s i 8y o s% 3 g 4 x x 5 ?! 8"
$ w 0 I
- O O } gg 2 ex o C O -M Z a
er . 7 1 0 z 04 - g S r e M ' _ M g m y I_I g
*5 0 0 y o o o E O E '(* 'o sy %,8 2
- E*z i 0j -
O ) 8 50 pe F * /s4>m M y,i M x w 2 0o eg o 0 o 5t o o 2 N C*
~$ 0 A rt b2 b$ i l4f > g 5 y g W lI NO
<z 4 g V ~
O O 2 . a i zS 4 V O Q =4 e 25 2r 0 7 E_ 2 uOa g O O MEN
*e o. o 5 e c S S-S 8 m M E W e E ES s w s = me 0
- x=
"I C 5 Y 5 T C Ea O z ~0 8 8 5 8 5 8 .E a e 87, =
* ,_ R wT M E sEEbe 5 P A Ce G E B e. p Sg 5 weSE wm E "G 88 g W Mw$52 W" s S1 gm g" g ,_ so z =f w35"= G. d' < 0 mi 5 e0 #"$ 5 ad SG 8 s-5Ec =c 5. seus 5=g m e - c- nm um w dWoc$ a2 a- -m - C "% $M Hg 55 88 E )
b e#M$d m-<-m 50 u< v-50 mm 5S.,j 5mm5 i~s em 2 om 0 _5 EW w -- .
BASELINE TESTING VALVE SAMPLE N0. 8 ASCO CAT ALOG NO. NP832063E NOTES:
- 1. The minimum v olt age required to shift the core on the first operation was 105 volts. After the first operation, the core shifted properly with the 65 volts applied.
( 2. External leakage, which does not affect ability to perform a typical safety function, was detected at the end cap / body joint and the solenoid base sub-assembly / body joint.
- 3. The valve was inst alled in an oven at 250*F for approximately two days before this reading was taken.
- l I
( l
#0 w
g T
*m T l
*X g
{ d E g O b Y w I x 8 ) i
- 2 '
W 0 'A u W
- g
=
/ o o
- A k 8 b 8 o k e
- 580 2 A A 2 y 2
% y W s
- 8 /
4 g 02 Sj 2 g
- 8$ D
- O g $f g
'I 4
a
#sj S
5 2 O M9 N)o
- 3 de O g o
g 0' I3 ,, o u
- 3 25 2
5 - 7 w
= 2 { r. - -
0 t ,o 2 e
$ dsq \n
@ 0 {y g ko 2 0
k ob y, e
- 0g a O N N y k o o O Au 1 0'
0 d C b e O O ag u g eJ
^f 5 g,% i i i i t p -
$$ 4 g I
{v {g {1 10 1 $ E 5t 4 0 0 o *8.$ g E C* O O O N 3E d O 2 I o 58 AX 2 am 7 o .n e5 m I M .. &s't - g I 1 x id 323 m.J j $ 0 h ' O O c5 f 1 p%$ $ 2x 0 v N% Om
>tu 8 S S
~
7e8 C. o O c' S S-3d m W e W W E ES
** E' G # 3 s =
= W 5 T $ T f e .
I.Sm
~E 8 8 5 8 5 8 .W e O E
=
5eed" 5 S
,_ wT a e bwwaL p 5 S S de G s wes5 2 3 5.8 g$r; w eel: ww ggwg*_ j. ~m 3" ..E e '-
w55" 5, , a 5 5=c= Gm dJ <0 0 $ cc s 50 ga" 0- Eg ad SG 8
- w. M 8x dWoc a9 a. -z-c- na um m
"- }1s ==
suse$
=><rm s so se 5 5a 55 c5 88 E v< w- 5 2.~g ma.R mm = om w- sr e
( BASELINE TESTING VALVE SAMPLE N0. 9 ASCO CATALOG NO. NP8321A2V NOTES:
- 1. External leakage, which does not affect ability to perform a typical safety function, was detected at the end cap / body joint.
- 2. The minimum voltage required to shift the core on the first operation was 145 volts. After the first operation, the core shifted properly with 65 volts applied.
- 3. The valve piston would not shift on the initial operation until the inlet pressure was increased above 100 psig. After the first operation, this valve shifted properly in the indicated pressure range.
(' 4. A coil insulation breakdown was detected at approximately 100 volts. Coil excitation, active coil turns and insulation resistance values were not determined. A new coil was substi-tuted so that baseline tests could be completed.
- 5. External leakage, which does not affect ability to perform a
! typical safety function, was detected at the end cap / body joint and the solenoid base sub-assembly / body joint.
- 6. This valve would not shift upon de-energization at any pressure in the indicated range. It should be noted that this valve did operate on demand as required up to the 12th day of the environ-mental DBE simul ation.
38g >
- N g m m 07 gT E @ i eT mTS m-* My* -
g 2 % 8wim 8 ) 0 w 0 -E tu is Tw 0 o W g c. . g
/ I t
m8 1Ap 0v .g n - U at 1t u*8T: h D @3% e- kg h g > 3 3 3 3 W D OfE
.e i
E U f ff f f o 0 m~ o 0 0 5 $o 2 ety I h o ~ . hs, yo, 1 2 O 5 4s', s & 1 11 1 1 E g i h s ! !s ! $ O $9 O O 5 g i'l if!
"!j g
I h E z > 7 E O
- S
- y W Oz b Jem 4 4 ; i 1 o g O o 7 g
, o o .$ C mG 7 O 2 d I A2 h
2
?W gN'Dy #
z5 4 7 $ 0 ) 28 #ov S s M w 07 a QE O }iv = Y0 M j og I 0 ME $ 2 g
$g 7 O A g,j 2
} f
$ .. ly; '+/ 0 2 M y W 4
*E o )I
$'$1 D o I ig gj g, g
!! , $\ o 2 AEE i=
ag g. 2g o e e m e
= s e_
.8
\m" - e s = = = re
% 4E
# G W G W gd 9 = W=
-m O 5 5
T 5 y 0 5 a 0 ,e a g '8 8
.* E e . .e2 Su nR m1 M E Egete Bo Sp ',
-8 Se 38 G E mmesa em m=2 mm G <. =
gggg2 c}a s gg gg r g= go z a aa em < egar <= muse z = 80 am es e 5*5ep 50 EO $2 ide " G4 EG EE m dWop$ - a2 ar rz '
- g M fr 55 s8 E EdM$d 50 SS We C5 EW D -)
m r -m m u< 5 u 0.- m z m, Imae ' 5 5 M,R G= mm m- -- <
l ( l BASELINE TESTING VALVE SAMPLE NO. 10 ASCO CATALOG NO. NP8323A38V NOTES:
- 1. The minimum voltage required to shift the solenoid 'A' core on the first operation was 255/60. After the first operation, the
( core shifted properly with the 102/60 test voltage applied.
- 2. External leakage, which does not affect ability to perform a typical safety f unction, was noted at the solenoid 'B' solenoid base sub-assembly / adapter joint.
- 3. The valve was installe'd in an oven at 250*F for approximately two days before this reading was taken.
i
39g y [ ,m 3 a g M 1
* * *si $ '
i #
~ ,
0 8 0 E < t $ h?$ E
^ 2 z gj]
'eep# 0 ie W 4 g y 0 8 m Y
- 2 'E 4 y i $
Q N W o
. . O o
O y 2 N h g *w
,'Ssj 1 hi 0
.u E
- O
- - o g g
o_ p 0 p_yo 2 a[ g 7
#0
= 4 x 2 2 E P a S e u t ox 1 g
- 82 8 1m
*2
/ e 7 f g. R U N h. dz AV v 0 0 2
g m4g o g
=
" s m o e o 8 i A5 2 Qea o, toy %g
**m oo e 1 1 g
w Q 1 o e i p2
/s4 y M s noT U 8E (9 y 2 UI 0 $@
g l gg Q V U NO 0 V 2 N" h l Eg O O O Aj ,
- s8 om 7# gp a 8E 4 +/ / w I w ,g , +
p5 58 4 f 4 3 r 2 0 2 0 2 2 o 8j g 1 gr O 9x
>0m REW S S o = o S S-
<=8
- m W E W W E ES g G W G W $5
$.W. e = y e y s ,a e E
* ~$ 8 8 5 8 5- 8 .W E e . Sm = -E mT m E 5EEbe Eo M 0 Se
-- g8 G E mm s a
#"g =S m=S@ mmei . =
a52 p}3 5 eN fSE yEG5 - d'* do z d wh5"x Gm e: <C G't C 5 an SG 8 5*5EC 50 5 ., $2$ - <$ W O ~ pd EG QE w erepe -Na = m s = ss e _, e m- -m- i WWM0
=>< g ,
su u< u-50 SS.# m5.3 mm 5 s g om w- EW {e b y Yo m s w i -
# $ gG %e e c w 0 g ~
v g is S 0
> 0 o t
- m E
= -
w A 7 7 rg! A
- % n-9 > I 1 2 1 v 8g a.
e G t If jl l{ u
* *m e >
m 0 l'h Xv vX Xt U ot to o W 4-
"$k=3 D mN a
w S_g vS m a 2 u$ , g
, %j -
V .. .. II t; s > !! !! II w - o y A
" It Et tt It 4 y 82 g g $ g 4
0 33 53 33 33 jf og 20 20 0M g 2. I" i ki 2 73 { 3
< t 1 -
T I T ~
$ .O E / h fr 4 os g 1p w 2 v' g eE ,fI5 'N
$ V w
*5 m~
3 w 0 $5 M* a -m m- >1 o 0 V si g$ u y
- S1 1% W 4 7 sk_*i i is em * . s 3 '
as pa g+ ,"#+ <% 3 ly v 2. wo yt D H f 2
- 5 u
i C2 8!EP
'4
$s A u
Bf 14 M ea [:S s E 2
$ k_iIg ti I as S- i
- se .. ..
g ?P > 13 31 i i 88 1 *g* I 9 .. fj4 *, s II II i I g , j Mg o ,
'ee .
I "E > 0 og v >>. >v Y. 0 0 e g' ' y z- 2 I CS E so o N om N O O 52a bc n 2x
=0m .
34W P E n e e e em d. J o d o 2 S-
*8 Dm $M a n & C #8 G W G W d
%W >8"E s< 5 y 5 y 2 = 0 u ==~ a .e E
% 8 4 5 8 5 e e $. Am s wv m =
l ga
$w 5eEGe 5 8 2 G # I C $$ wWS) wwef. g W mwg B semsg e s es gar. g =!"
G - w"= G mo z wEs"z Gm d < 0g 3 0 4 0 ES _, W SG S 5*52C Ot 5. $2n sWo z " pd nG EE w dWop$ - aE a-50 S- =S le 55 M 8 "- " M fr 55 88 5 ER C5 -- EW G
)
E"dMud
><-=
50 u< u- mm y m a.g z ow w- < l l ' -- -~
BASELINE TESTING VALVE SAMPLE NO. 12 ASCO CATALOG NO. NP8344B68E NOTES:
- 1. External leakage, which does not affect ability to perform a typical safety function, was noted at the piston end body / main body joint and the seat / main body joint.
- 2. The valve would not shif t with applied inlet pressure below 15 psig
- 3. The minimum voltage required to shif t the Solenoid 'A' core on
- the first operation was 81 volts. After the first operation,the.
(' core shifted with 65 volts applied. In addition, the valve would not shift at any pressure in the indicated pressure range. It s houl d be noted that this valve did operate on demand up to the 13th day of the environmental DBE simulation and did maintain a de-energized (failsafe) position for the remainder of the 30-day simulation.
- 4. External leakage, which does not affect ability to perform a typical safety function, was detected at the piston end body /
main body joint, the seat / main body joint and both solenoid base sub-assembly / body joints.
- 5. The valve was installed in an oven at 250*F for approximately two days before this reading was taken.
C
O 280 to m . y j m . m W t- # 7 - g g
= ort VI s 2 2 $ # )
S * $ S-I 0 0 h) o v
< e t -s v v U t W s
! i 2 3 o 0 0 2 4 i 5 E#04990 g0 W 9 0419
. i i u E -Q 8 4,h
/s
- g mI f I g g *
' $3 E k
E N$ h [ 0 0 g 0
'3ss j
{
'Z O
'* 5 0 0 0 $ $g*t h p
g*3
> . j O W y 07 - W r3 g ~f o /sg t 2 mg I _ g g 2 7 0 '
O o E 4 $s D O I 9 7 riy 0 -2 3 g
#0 4
= 4 .
m o0 g I 'O O 2 > 07 Ze / t 2 1Ai ; M .M 2 E
,; 8 @ 0 is o 0 o 3 ,.
m i D 0 2
^I* 5 gM **is #e# . .
e =5 4 I I E A ) , $$ 4 > g $4 _ v o u o 83 3 mglg 5e i o
*g *o z d 2
- c=
3$ AM 2 ES i cr _ . e
$ .. l}'*/ > ' g g W
- m M $ r 2 m. O x-CS 5 4 o h '(i 0 0 o 2 2 m
2x . O x $
>dM S S gEW e o e s-ve o C
#8 _ W e W e E ES mW g G W G W pc mez p 5 y 5 y 0 me 0 E ~, 8 8 5 8 5 E .W 5 e . *S- =
-R my M E 5E20$ 5 8 g g de 38 G E mmg s a. p sg mws, mm y m = -
Wea52 mEE"= 5 Um Sm @8ES de <$oa fs*di - - U #"b E
$o =
IE O d 5*5WP Ot E. $ 2,v j *$",W yi '- p- M"G QE m dWop$ aR as rz- - M Ex 55 88 E W __.-W M 0 .=! Eu m. 50- S S. .,l5 _m 3.y. 5 Ee om C5 m _W W .G 3
1 BASELINE TESTING VALVE SAMPLE NO. 13 ASCO CATALOG N0. NP8314C38V NOTES:
- 1. The valve would not shift to the energized position on the 1st operation with up to 300 volts applied. After the valve was disassembled and the core assembly was manually freed from the seat, the valve shifted properly with the req ui re d 0.080 amp test current ap pl.i ed .
- 2. External leakage, which does not affect ability to perform a typical safety function, was detected at the solenoid base sub-assembly / body joint.
- 3. During removal of this valve f rom the environmental DBE simula-tion set-up, the solenoid coil leads were accidently pulled out of the coil and the dielectric test results, coil excitation, i
active coil turns and *nsulation resistance could not be determined. A new coil was substituted so that baseline tests could be completed. i i
~
-s4-OO W @ lp Y i % O % % ;
w - E T. E -4 4 f38 ? I i M V g ) S 0 F W e w i EA 1g)0 F E v
'i o 1 9 4 $ - 3ea 2 i T 0 h :- T m $
a U o wm e = 2 f o $ 0r u 'ss j ,jo, ^Z nel Oi 1 *M 0 m 'te s#4 $ i i $ s 8E D i *0'/s $ 8 8 f fm ! ! ) I ij I 9 s 8 0 o g 2 l g j #v 0 $
=
h 2 % ra t ay o 3 ^3 ' C*, s+is, & -
- a I V34
- h. fg 5 8 h!
se Uov M o u o if M o 3 a C" eo 2 x O '1 A2 2 38 ' ES "E
$ Y-7F
/g'*/ > g kt 3m i t g y
- kI
*I N o "E W \ _
VF y 3 8gz @m M o O o EE N 2 gr .t e 0 Es
>0m o $5W $. S S <- o e o e a s-t8 m W W W e E ES *$Es ,. I m 5 5 E $ m 83 m g e w a = "
a Es v
,2o- o
- o *5 5 m EddWE =5 a q m '- Ma $ =
p- e ag me i n es s= e" s 0$8 s! 2 E 04 WE OES!! af 5* s gwe e s. sm sar; m se s" WmWe5 WE $~ 5e c t 50 W =$ S
=w
=
C e _E am-se . -w -- " s -- g = 58 = ; M58Md ==ses ex se sv$. d" dm 45 e =. {. $ se =e as x mE WW 88 p u s.,o as.0.s
( BASELINE TESTING VALVE SAMPLE NO. 14 ASCO CATALOG N0. NP8317A29V NOTES:
- 1. The valve would not consistently quick exhaust between 25 & 75 psi and would not quick exhaust at pressures less than 25 psi.
However, it would shift on demand at all pressures in the indicated range since the second (pilot) exhaust port remained functional.
- 2. The valve would not consistently quick exhaust between 50 & 75 psi and would not quick exhaust at pressures less than 50 psi.
However, it would shift on demand at all pressures in the ( indicated range since the second (pilot) exhaust port remained functional.
- 3. The valve would not quick exhaust at any pressure but would shift on demand at all pressures in the indicated range since the second (pilot) exhaust port remained functional.
- 4. The minimum vo lt age required to shift the valve on the first operation was 137 volts. After the first operation, the valve shifted properly with 65 volts applied.
- 5. The coil was found to be open and, therefore, dielectric test results, coil excitation, active coil turns and insulation
- resistance valves were not determined. A new coil was substi-tuted so that baseline tests could be completed.
l
- 6. External leakage was detected at the solenoid base sub-assembly /
body joint and the seat / body joint. l
~
l l S.
SUMMARY
OF PROGRAM RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: 5.1. Table 5.1 indicates the qualification status of all I l valves included in the eight generic valve families considered in this qualification program as determined by the testing summarized in this report. As indicated in Table 5.1, this program has successfully defined a level of qualification for most o f' the valves considered in this program; although, due to some performance anomalies, reduced levels of qualification have been indicated for some valve types. 5.2. One performance anomaly which resulted in a reduced level of quali fi cation for certain valve categories involves Catalog NP-1 valves containing Viton dyn ami c seal s. As can be seen from the post-radiation DBE simul atio n baseline test summary, six of the eight valves tested which contained Viton elastomers would not shif t position at minimum rated voltage on the first operation following the DBE radiation exposure due to slight adherence of the dyn ami c Viton seals to mating metal surfaces. In most cases, the valves did shift to the proper energized position upon application of a higher voltage. After a thorough analysis of this occurrence, ASCO has conserv-atively concluded that Catalog NP-1 valves containing Viton dyn ami c seals should not be used in applications where the s tives may be required to shif; position following exposure to total gamma radiation doses in excess of 20 megarads. However, valves containing Viton dynamic s e al s may still be considered acceptable up to
( 5.
SUMMARY
OF PROGRAM RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: 5.2. -continued-200 megarad total dose if they are not required to shift position after exposure to radiation doses in excess of 20 megarads. 5.3. A second performance anomaly which was noted during this test program involves the solenoid coils used in ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves. As a result of moisture entry into the solenoid enclosures curing the environmental DBE simulation, several valve performance anomalies were noted during the environmental DBE simulation and during the post environmental DBE simulation baseline testing. After a careful analysis of all test data, ASCO has ( concluded that all moisture related coil problems which occurred during this qualification test program were the result of moisture which entered through the conduit connections of the ASCO NP-1 valves and that the reason for all moisture entry was inadequate sealing of the solenoid enclosure conduit connections during the environ-me nt al DBE simul ation. Based on the successful perfor-mance of other valves, ASCO has further concluded that I installation of ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves using a properly sealed vented conduit / junction box system, as described in ASCO Catalog NP-1 valve installation and maintenance instruction sheets, will prevent similar performance anomalies due to moisture entry into the solenoid en-( closures.
1
- 5.
SUMMARY
OF PROGRAM RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: -continued- l 5.4. It should be noted that, in order to e l i m.i n a t e the necessity of sealing the conduit connections on all ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves, ASCO has developed a special nuclear grada molded solenoid coil which will not be susceptible to the type of moisture rel ated performance anomalies wh'ich occurred on the non-molded coils included in this test program. Two of these new molded coils were inclu-ded in this program and their testing is summarized in Appendix K to this report. 5.5. In addition to the performance anomalics described above, several other performance anomalies occurred on specific test items. All performance anomalies which occurred during this q u al i fi c ati on test program have been analyzed for their effect on the qualification status of Catalog NP-1 valves. Table 5.1 indicates the results of this analysis. A more detailed description of the performance of each of the 14 valves included in this qualification program is included in Appendix J to this report.
. )
( P THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ( P
}
TABLE 5.1
SUMMARY
OF QUALIFICATION PROGRAM RESULTS BULLETIN NO. TYPE SEATING _
,_, TYPE ELAST0MERS QUALIFICATION STATUS 206-380 Metal Ethylene Propylene Category I Viton (Suffix 'V') Category I Resilient (Suffix 'R') Ethylene Propylene Category I Viton (Suffix 'V') Category II 206-381 Metal Ethylene Propylene Category I Viton (Suffix 'V') Category I Resilient (Suffix 'R') Ethylene Propylene Category I Viton (Suffix 'V') Category II 206-832 Metal Ethylene Propylene Category I Viton (Suffix 'V') Category I Resilient (Suffix 'R') Ethylene Propylene Category I Viton (Suffix 'V') Category II 208-266 Metal Ethylene Propylene Category I y Viton (Suffix 'V') Category I Resilient (Suffix 'R') Ethylene Propylene Category I Viton (Suffix 'V') Category II 208-448 Metal Ethylene Propylene Category I Viton (Suffix 'V') Category I Resilient (Suffix 'R') Ethy_lene Profylene Category I l
Viton (Suffix 'V') Category II 210-036 Metal Ethylene Propylene Category I Viton (Suffix 'V') Category I Resilient (Suffix 'R') Ethylene Propylene Category I __ Viton (Suffix 'V') Category II NP8314 Metal (Suffix 'L') Ethylene Propylene (Suffix 'E') Category I Viton (Suffix 'V') Category I Resilient Ethylene Propylene (Suffix 'E') Category I Viton (Suffix 'V') Category II i
TABLE 5.1: -continued-BULLETIN NO. TYPE SEATING TYPE ELASTOMERS QUALIFICATION STATUS NP8316 Resilieret Ethylene Propylene (Suffix 'E') Category I Viton (Suffix 'V') Category IV NP8317 Resilient All Types Category V NP8320 Resilient Ethylene Propylene (Suffix 'E') Category I Viton (Suffix 'V') Category II NP8321 Resilient Ethylene Propylene (Suffix 'E') Category III Viton (Suffix 'V') Category IV NP8323 Resilient Ethylene Propylene (Suffix 'E') Category I Viton (Suffix 'V'). Category II NP8344 Resilient Ethylene Propylene (Suffix 'E') Category III Viton (Suffix 'V') Category IV CATEGORY I - Fully qualified to the test levels included in this program (as summarized in Table 5.2). CATEGORY II - Qualified to the test levels included in this program (as summarized in Table 5.2) only for those applica-tions where valves are not required to shift position (' following exposure to gamma doses in excess of 20 megarads. CATEGORY III - Not qualified to the test levels included in this program but qualified to the lower test levels included in a previous ASCO qualification program (Refer to ASCO Report No. AQS-21678/TR, Rev.
'A').
CATEGORY IV - Not qualified to the test levels ' included in this program but qualified to the lower test levels included in a previous ASCO qualification program only for those applications where valves are not required to shift position following exposure to gamma doses in excess of 20 megarads (Refer to
- ASCO Report No. AQS-21678/TR, Rev. 'A').
l CATEGORY Y - These valves have not been and will not be offered for nuclear applications. j l (
i 1
. TABLE 5.2
SUMMARY
-OF MAJOR TEST PARAMETERS AND QUALIFICATION LEVELS DEMONSTRATED 4 ! ~ TEST PHASE TEST PARAMETERS QUALIFICATION LEVEL i DEMONSTRATED
- Thermal Aging Simulation 18-1/4 days in a 8 year minimum life
- (REF
- Report Section 4.1.1) 250*F ambient in a 140*F ambient.
I Refer to Appendix C for more specific information. Wear Aging Simulation - 20,000 cycles 20,000 de-energize to
- (REF
- Report Section 4.1.2) energize to de-energize
- cycles. Refer to Ap- - pendix C for more specific information. Pressurization Aging Fifteen Ambient 15 containment pres- fl S im ul'a t i o n Pressure Excursions surizations to 80 psig 8 (REF: Report Section 4.1.3) to 80 psig maximum. Radiation Aging Simulation 23 megarads of gamma 20 megarad maximum dose (REF: Report Section 4.1.4) r ad i at .i on of nonaccident gamma - radiation.** Refer to Appendix C for more specific information, j Vibration Aging Simulation 5-200-5 Hz sweeps at Typical plant induced (REF: Report Section 4.1.5) up to 0.75g for 90 vibration for life of minutes in each of the valve. three orthogonal axes Seismic Aging (OBE) Simula- Two 1-35-1 Hz sweeps at 5 typical operating basis tion up to 3g in each of earthquakes with up to 39
-(REF: Report Section 4.1.6) three orthogonal axes peak acceleration.
I
m A m i T ABLE 5.2: -continued-TEST PARAMETERS QUALIFICATION LEVEL TEST PHASE DEMONSTRATED
- Single frequency sine beat A typical safe shutdown l Seismic DBE (SSE) Simulation exposures at up to 15g at earthquake with up to (REF: Report Section 4.2.1) 38 frequencies from 1-35 Hz 13.5g peak acceleration.
l in each of three'orthogonal axes 182 megarads of gamma 163 megarad maximum dose Rad.iation DBE Simulation of accident gamna radia-(REF: Report Section 4.2.2) radiation tion.** Temperature profile as bI 30-day LOCA/HEL8 simulation shown in Figure 5.1 and l Environmental DBE Simulation with a peak ambient tempera-(REF: Report Section 4.2.3) ture of 420*F and a peak ambient pressure up to ambient pressure of 70 psig 63 psig.
- The qualification levels listed generally indicate the maximum levels of qualification demonstrated by this program and, therefore, may not be applicable Margin levels to asall Catalog NP-1 described in Ap-valves covered by this program (Refer to Table 5.3).
pendix G to this report have been considered and applied, where applicable, to the in-dicated test levels.
**In plant locations where the nonaccident radiation dosethe increase willqualified not reachaccident 20 megarads, level 90%
(to of the excess aging level may be applied to 181 megarads maximum).
405'F 450_ 350*p
- 340 *F 400-~ '
\
320*F
~
302 *F sso- ess e Rw =
% 300 ~_
h 1 l 2$8*f
~
250 '
- hi 200 _
Z (50 _
/00 ~ i i i i i i s a isi isi sisi sie iisisisii 0 10402 41012 9 12 242345 to 20 27
-SEC --M/NUTES HOURS DAYS TIME QUAUF/ED AMB/ENT TEMPERATURE PROF /LE DEMOA/STRATED BY THE COMB /NED LOSS -OF -COOL AA/T ACC/ DEAF 7(L OCA)/H/6H ENER6YHA/EBREAK(HEL B)S/MULAT/CN WrER APPUCAT/0N OFALL MARG /N SUGGESTED /N [EEE 323-/974)
/~/GURE 5. f l _
Atiloitmlic Switch Co. m==am M Smee 1888 FLOAHAM PARK,NEW JERSEY o7032 . N s ,20i see rooo N.Y-l212' 34-3M NOTICE: This report is the property of Automar.ic Switch Company and may not be reproduced without authorization from Automatic Switch Company, nor may excerpts be printed and distributed. This book must be returned immediately upon request. TEST REPORT NO. AQR-67368/REV. O REPORT ON QUALIFICATION OF AUTOMATIC SWITCH CO. (ASCO) CATALOG NP-1 SOLEN 0ID VALVES FOR SAFETY-RELATED APPLICATIONS IN NUCLEAR POWER GENERATING STATIONS l REVISION NO. DATE ISSUED PREPARED REVIEWED APPROVED ! ( STATE OF NEW JERSEY PREPARED BY: COUNTY OF MORRIS RONALD D. POWELL, New Jersey Professional Engineering M p' Registration No. 14238, JOHN R. SHANK being duly sworn, deposes Product Engineer and says: Nuclear Products Valve Engineering The information contained in this report is the result of REVIEWED BY: a carefully conducted and complete test program and is to the best of his knowledge correct and true in all // respects. RONALD D. POWELL Product Engineering Manager d a e ng neer ng
. APPROVED BY:
Sworn and Jubscribed to before f' 3 me thisAM day of rfouh (~ "" hm. tf6 b w j LW] 11UAW DAVID J. VDLLMER
~
(/ Chief Engineer JUNE ALBANE9E Valve Engineering 47:= = w = - ,
* *. *- --e e:a F=.... brw 22 1382
Automatic Switch Co. ee=:=am M Since 1888
- FLORHAM PARK,NEW JERSEY 07032 N J-l2011966-2000 / N Y -1212' 343765 l
AQR-67368 APPENDIX A l SPECIFICATION NO. AQS-21680/REV. C QUALIFICATION SPECIFICATION FOR AUTOMATIC SWITCH CO. (ASCO) CATALOG NP-1 SOLEN 0ID VALVES ( INITIAL ISSUE HAY 12, 1980 REVISION DATE BY APPROVED A 8-6-80
- B 11-21-80 92$
C 7-13-81 l l l l l (
e CONTENTS SECTION PAGE
- 1. Introduction .......................................... Al
- 2. Scope .................................................Al
- 3. Equipment De s cript ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A 2
- 4. Installation Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A 2 4.1 Mounting Orientation ............................. A2 4.2 Connections and Interfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A2 4.3 Fixturing ........................................ A3
- 5. Specification of Valve Life ........................... A3 5.1 Design Life ...................................... A3 5.2 Installed Life ................................... A3 5.3 Qualified Life Objective ......................... A4
- 6. Performance Specification ............................. A4 6.1 Acceptable Limits of Operation ................... A4
{ 6.2 Safety Function To be Demonstrated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A5 6.3 Conditions Which Constitute Test Failure . . . . . . . . . A6 .
- 7. Loading ............................................... A6 7.1 Me th od o f Load S imulat ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A 6 7.2 Verification of Operability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A7
- 8. Environmental Service Conditions ...................... A7 8.1 Normal and Abnormal Ambient ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A7 8.1.1 Tempera'ure t ............................... A7 8.1.2 Pressure .................................. A7 8.1.3 Relative Humidity ......................... A7 8.1.4 Chemical Composition of Environment . . . . . . . A7 l
8.1.5 Radiation Environment...................... A7 8.1.6 Seismic Environment (OBE) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A7 8.1.7 Vibration Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A7 8.1.8 Duty Cycle ................................ A8 8.1.9 Process Fluid ............................. A8
- ,w g %-- - - - -
yv -gw-q- - - --- - - - -- , + -m---
GQNIfdilE
)
SECTION 8 -continued- PAGE B.2 Design Basis Event and Post DBE A8 Service Conditions ............................. 8.2.1 Temperature ............................. A8 8.2.2 Pressure ................................ A8 8.2.3 Relative Humidity ....................... A8 8.2.4 Chemical Composition of Environment ..... A8 8.2.5 Radiation Environment ................... A8 8.2.6 Seismic Environment (SSE) ............... A8 8.2.7 Duty Cycle .............................. A8 8.2.8 Process Fluid ........................... A8
- 9. Qualification Type-Test Procedure.................... A9 9.1 Description of Test Items ...................... A9 9.2 Inspection of Test Items ....................... A10 9.3 Baseline Data Operation ........................ A10 9.4 Aging Simulation ............................... A10 9.4.1 Thermal Aging ........................... A10
)
9.4.2 Wear Aging .............................. A12 9.4.3 Pressurization Aging .................... A12 9.4.4 Radiation Aging ......................... A13 9.4.5 Vibration Aging ......................... A13 9.4.6 OBE Simulation and Resonance Testing .... A14 9.5 DBE and Post DBE Simulation .................... A15 9.5.1 Seismic Event Simulation ................ A15 9.5.2 DBE Radiation Simulation ................ A16 9.5.3 Environmental DBE Simulation ............ A17 9.6 Post Test Inspection & Disassembly ............. A22
- 10. Reports and Certification ........................... A22 o
- )
1 l
1 I CQHTIHLS. LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. Page 9.1 Seismic Qualification Required Input Motion ................................ A 25 9.2 Environmental Qualification Para-meters for Combined, Loss-of-Coolant Accident (LOCA)/High Energy Line Break (HELB) S!mulation ..................... A 26 ) 9.3 Typical Pipe Schematic for LOCA/ ' HELB Simulation ............................. A 27 LIST OF TABLES 9.1 Identification of Test Valves ............... A23 ( LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix AI. Valve Design Specification Sheets (VDSS) .... AI-l AII. Coil Insulation Resistance Measurement Procedure ................................... AII-l Coil Dielectric Strength Measurement Procedure ................................... AII-l AIII. Individual Valve Test Procedures ............ AIII-l f l l l t l l (1
-Al-QUALIFICATION SPECIFICATION,FOR AUTOMATIC SWITCH CO. (ASCO) CATALOG NP-l SOLENOID VALVES }
- 1. INTRODUCTION:
This specification for qualification is for the purpose of conducting a program, the ultimate aim of which is to provide generic qualification for a family of solenoid valves for use in Nuclear Power Generating Stations. This document is divided into two basic parts: Part 1 is the equipment specification, including those items re-quired for demonstration of qualification by acceptable methods of type testing; Part 2 is the type test procedure defining the specific environmental parameters during the application of which the equipment must demonstrate satis- . factory operation within the constraints of the specifica-tions presented in the.first part. Part 1 includes Sec-tions 1 through 8; Part 2 includes Sections 9 and 10.
- 2. SCOPE:
This program is being conducted in accordance with the I suggestions and requirements contained in the following documents. 2.1. IEEE 323-1974 "IEEE Standard for Qualifying Class IE Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations". 2.2. IEEE 344-1974 "IEEE Recommended Practices for Seismic Qualification of Class IE Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations". 2.3. IEEE 382-1980 (Revision of IEEE 382-1972) "IEEE Standard for Qualification,ut F ifety-Related Valve Actuators". 2.4. IEEE 627-1980 "IEEE Standard for Design Qualifi-cation of Safety Systems Equipment Used in Nuclear Power Generating Stations". 2.5. The following ASCO documents for acceptance and production testing. 2.5.1. Valve Design Specification Sheets (Appendix AI). J
-A2-
- 2. SCOPE:
( 2.5. -continued-2.5.2. Individual valve Test Procedures (Appendix AIII). 2.5.3. Measurement of Coil Insulation Resistance Procedure (Appendix AII). 2.5.4. Measurement of Coil Dielectric Strength Procedure (Appendix AII).
- 3. EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION:
The following equipment items are included in the quali-fication program. These items form the generic basis for selec-tion of the specific test units. 3.1. Bulletins 206-380, 206-381, 208-448, 208-266, 206-832 and 210-036. REF: VDSS 3.1 3.2. Bulletin NP8314. REF: VDSS 3.2 ' 3.3. Bulletin NP8316 REF: VDSS 3.3 3.4. Bulletin NP8317 REF: VDSS 3.4 3.5. Bulletin NP8320 REF: VDSS 3.5 3.6. Bulletin NP8321 REF: VDSS 3.6 3.7. Bulletin NP8323 REF: VDSS 3.7 3.8. Bulletin NP8344 REF: VDSS 3.8
- 4. INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS:
4.1. Mounting orientation - The mounting orientation during all phases of the qualification test program shall be such that the axis of the coil (s) (or Solenoid 'A' coil for Bulletin NP8323 valves) remains in a vertical and upright position. 4.2. Connections and Interfaces - All connecting tubing,
, . . . . _ . _ - - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - _ ~-. . . . . . _ . . - - . . . . - _ _ .
I
-A3-
- 4. INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS:
4.2. -continued- I
- fittings, and other devices utilized for directing process fluid to the valve shall be constructed of j materials compatible with the specified operating
- environments, process fluid and valve body. Tubing,
) fittings, conduit, electrical lines, etc., shall be constructed of materials suitable for operation in the expected environments and be of sufficient size and quality so as not to degrade the safety function or classification of the test valve.
- During the environmental DBE simulation phase of the qualification test program, installation of the test
! valves shall include provisions such that the down-ward directed chemical spray of the simulation will not enter the solenoid housings through their con-duit hubs or the internal areas of the valves through their exhaust ports. However, connections to the con-4 duit hubs of the solenoid housings shall not be hermetic. J 4.3. Fixturing - Fixtures shall be provided to accommodate test valves in accordance with their particular mount-ing and installation requirements as defined above or in the Valve Design Specification Sheets. Fixtures shall be used solely to facilitate holding test valves and are not to amplify or dampen motions that the valves wou,1d be expected to experience in service. Fixtures shall not interfere with the safety function of the test valves.
- 5. SPECIFICATION OF VALVE LIFE:
5.1. Design Life - All ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves have a design life of 40 years, during which interval t; tis-factory performance shall be demonstrated for the design service conditions as presented in Section 8. 5.2. Installed Life - All ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves have an installed life of 40 years and 2L.*/00 cycles. Coils and elastomeric components may Lequire periodic i
-A4-
- 5. SPECIFICATION OF VALVE LIFE: ,
5.2. -continued-replacement during the valve's installed life. The I exact replacement period will depend on ambient service conditions and postulated DBE conditions. Specific replacement periods for elastomeric com-ponents and coils will be detailed in the final test report. These replacement periods will be determined by calculations using the Arrhenius Equation and the thermal aging to be included in the qualification test program. 5.3. Qualified Life Objective - In accordance with the definition of qualified life as the period of time during which satisfactory performance can be demon-strated for the service conditions, it is the inten-tion of this program to establish the qualified life of the subject valves as coinciding with a plant design life of 40 years.
- 6. PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION:
6.1. Acceptable Limits of Operation: The acceptable limits of operation of the subject valves, unless otherwise specified, are as follows: 6.1.1. All AC valves and non-battery operated DC valves must operate on demand at any voltage between 15% below'and 10% above the specified ! nominal AC or DC voltage (102 volts to 132 volts for a 120 volt nominal rating). Bat-tery operated DC valves must operate on l demand at any voltage between 28% below and i
- 12% above the specified nominal DC voltage (90 volts to 140 volts for a 125 volt nom-
[ inal rating). 6.1.2. Valves must operate at the minimum and maxi-l l mum operating pressure differentials as I stated in the Valve Design Specification ( Sheets (Appendix AI).
- l
-AS-
- 6. PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION:
6.1. -continued- I l 6.1.3. Valve coils must operate within the follow-ing limits of acceptability: 6.1.3.1. Insulation Resistance: 1.0 megohm (minimum) at 500 VDC. 6.1.3.2. Dielectric Strength: Leakage cur-
. rent less than 0.5 milliamp at twice rated voltage plus 1000 VAC applied for a period of one minute.
6.2. Safety Function To Be Demonstrated: The required safety function performance verification objective to be demonstrated during DBE and post DBE simulation phases of testing for all valves under test is as follows: 6.2.1. All valves must, when the applied inlet pres-sure is at any value between the applicable minimum and maximum operating prcssure dif-ferentials (as stated in the valve design ) specification sheets, Appendix AI), shift to their normally energized position upon the application of a voltage within the limits specified in Section 6.1.1 and must remain in that position while maintained energized within the limits specified in Section 6.1.1. Conversely, all valves must, when the applied inlet pressure is at any value between the applicable minimum and maximum operating differentials, shift to their normally de-energized position upon removal of the applied electrical input and must remain in that position while the sole-noid is maintained de-energized. 6.2.2. All valves must not have a pressure increase at a cylinder port which is required to be vented or pressure decrease at a cylinder
--- _- . - _ _ _ _ _ . = . _ - _ _
-A6-
- 6. PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION:
6.2.2. -continued-port which is required to be pressurized in excess of 10% of the maximum operating pres-sure differential as stated in the valve
- design specification sheets (Appendix AI) when the applied inlet pressure is at any value between the applicable minimum and f maximum operating differentials as stated in the valve design specification sheets (Appendix AI).
6.3. Conditions Which Constitute Test Failure: Any failure to perform as outlined in Section 6.2 shall be considered a test failure and any such i occurrence shall be fully documented in the final test report. Unless suitable justification can be provided by ASCO and/or additional testing can demonstrate that the failure cause on a specific ( test item has been eliminated or that the failure , does not represent a potential common mode failure
- in actual nuclear power plant applications, the final test report shall conclude that the specific test item is not qualified or with adequate justi-l fication, has a reduced level of qualification.
- 7. LOADING:
7.1. Method of Load Simulation: The test valves will be subjected to operational loads by means suitable to duplicate or simulate actual operation with the process fluid as specified in the ASCO valve design specification sheet and at the valve design service conditions. Where applica-ble, the test set-up utilized in conjunction with load simulation shall provide for continuous opera-tion and monitoring of pertinent performance charac-teristics that include, but are not limited to the following parameters: A. Cycle rate and on-off time. i
~. T .-- . , _ . _ _ - .- - . - . - , - - . _ - . . _ . _ . . . _ _ . . , . _ -
-A7-
- 7. LOADING:
7.1. -continued- I B. Cycle count. C. Pressure at valve inlet and cylinder port (s). D. Seat leakage. E. Electrical characteristics of coil, as appli-cable, e.g. supply voltage, current, power. F. External leakage. G. Proper operation. 7.2. Verification of Operability: The methods or procedures utilized for load simula-tion operation shall be sufficient to provide proof of operability in accordance with the valve perfor-mance specification.
- 8. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE CONDITIONS:
The following defines the service conditions expected in typical nuclear power plant applications. These values form the basis for determination of the qualification test levels contained in Section 9. I 8.1. Normal and Abnormal Ambient:
8.1.1. Temperature
32*F to 140*F; Ave. 100*F.
8.1.2. Pressure
8 psia to 17 psia; Ave. O psig Valves within containment may also be subjected to approximately 15 pressuriza-tion cycles to approximately 80 psig dur-ing the life of the plant when the con-tainment is leak tested. l 8.1.3. Relative Humidity: 0% to 100%; Ave. 55% 8.1.4. Chemical Composition of Environment: Standard atmospheric composition. 8.1.5. Radiation environment: Maximum of 5.0 x ! 107 rads T.I.D./40 years gamma radiation. 8.1.6. Seismic Environment (OBE): Maximum of 3g in each of three orthogonal axes. 8.1.7. Vibration Environment: Vibration Endurance capability to be demonstrated for typical y
l l
-A 8-l l
- 8. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE CONDITIONS:
8.1.7. -continued-normal plant-induced vibration conditions. 8.1.8. Duty Cycle: Normally energized. 8.1.9. Process Fluid: Instrument quality air (free of petroleum based oils and compounds when valves with ethylene propylene elastomers are used). 8.2. Design Basis Event and Post DBE Service Conditions:
8.2.1. Temperature
Any LOCA or HELB temperature conditions (PWR or BWR) which, with adequate margin added, are enveloped by the temperature conditions shown in Figure 9.2.
8.2.2. Pressure
Any LOCA or HELB pressure con-ditions (PWR or BWR) which, with adequate margin added, are enveloped by the pressure conditions shown in Figure 9.2. 8.2.3. Relative Humidity: All steam environment (_ for temperatures in excess of 250*F; greater than 90% for other conditions. 8.2.4. Chemical Compocition of Environment: De-mineralized water spray or borated water spray in solution with sodium thiosulfate and buffered with rodium hydroxide. I 8.2.5. Radiation Environment: Maximum of 1.63 x 108 rads T.I.D. gamma radiation and 8.18 x 108 rads T.I.D. beta radiation. 8.2.6. Seismic Environment (SSE): Maximum of I 4.5g in each of three orthogonal axes. 8.2.7. Duty Cycle: Normally de-energized (capabil_ty to operate on demand to be demonstrated).
- 8. 2.8 . Process Fluid: Instrument quality air
, (free of petroleum based oils and com-l pounds when valves with ethylene propylene elastomers are used). t i
-A9-
- 9. QUALIFICATION TYPE-TEST PROCEDURE:
The type-test shall consist of a series of aging ) phases which are to be followed by a simulation of DBE and post DBE occurrences. Suitable inspection and monite:- ing of the test valves shall be included such that a deter-mination can be made regarding each test valve's ability to perform its intended function under all conditions considered in the type-test sequence. First rate laboratory practices shall be followed throughout this test program. Accurate and complete data is to be recorded and maintained for all phases of testing and certification shall be provided by a responsible laboratory supervisor indicating that the data provided for each test phase represents a complete and ac-curate account of the tests conducted and results obtained. Certification for radiation exposures shall also be pro-vided and shall include specification of the actual minimum dose of each exposure and dose rate (s) . The instrumenta-tion used to measure all significant parameters shall be listed along with each instrument's calibration data and accuracy. Significant parameters include but are not limited to time, frequency, acceleration, number of cycles, temperature, pressure, relative humidity, pH, voltage, cur-rent, radiation dose and dose rate. Throughout all phases of testing, adjustments shall be made for measurement ac-curacy such that the actual levels of testing are at least as severe as specified in this section. Photographs shall be taken or diagrams made as required to enhance the de-scription of testing conducted and test setups used during each phase of this test program. ASCO Engineering shall be provided the opportunity to review all test setups before the start of each test phase and to witness all phases of test-ing. 9.1. Description of Test Items: The specific items to be tested are listed in Table 9.1. Reference'is made to the valve design specification sheets (Appendix AI) for the valve classification and specifications. ! t- - _1 - _ _ _ - - -
l
-A10-
- 9. QUALIFICATION TYPE-TEST PROC'EDURE: -
continued-(- 9.2. Inspection of Test Items: The test items shall be inspected prior to testing to assure that they have not been damaged by handl-ing subsequent to manufacture. Any damage to the units or abnormality in performance shall be duly noted and recorded with appropriate follow-up action suggested. 9.3. Baseline Data Operation: ] The test itams shall be operated to verify performance specifications and provide baseline data for comparison with performance at other stages of the test. Specifi-cally, baseline operation shall be performed where noted in the type test procedure and shall consist of the following: A. A check of coil insulation resistance at 500 VDC (REF: Appendix AII). B. A check of active coil turns (prior to the start of type testing and following the environmental DBE simulation only). C. A check for proper valve operation in accordance with the applicable individual valve test pro-cedure (Appendix AIII). 9.4. Aging Simulation: Six general aging phases have been considered in this qualification program. They are: thermal aging, wear aging, pressurization aging, radiation aging, /ibra-tion aging and OBE simulation (with resonance tes' ting).
- The aging phases, wh'ich are intended to simulate all potentially degrading conditions of normal service, "
take into account the particular maintenance schedule associated with the equipment, wherein organic mate-rials may require replacement during the installed life period. 9.4.1. Thermal Aging - The basis for thermal aging was determined to be a period of 8 years at , _mm_.,. , m . , . , _ - - . . _ _ . , , _ . . . - - - ,-_.-._.,y ., - -- ,
- - - - - - , , - - . . , - . . . ,,-.m., .
-A ll-
- 9. QUALIFICATION TYPE-TEST PROCEDURE:
9.4.1. -continued- ) an ambient temperature of 140*F. This period is to be simulated by performing an accelerated aging program consisting of exposure of the test valves to a mini-mum temperature of 250*F for a period'of 18-1/4 days. A minimum of 2,000 cycles (10%) of the wear aging as described in ! Section 9.4.2, shall be performed con-currently with this thermal aging ex-posure. When not being cycled, the valves should be continuously energized at nominal voltage with maximum operating pressure differentials applied. The accelerated test period has been cal-culated by the modified Arrhenius equation: G 1 1 I ~ k T1 T2 ) t 1 /t 2 =e I where: T1 = Normal service temperature (*k) T2 = Accelerated aging temperature (*k) t1 = Normal service time (hours) t2 = Accelerated aging time (hours)
@ = Reaction activation energy (eV) k = Boltzmann's Constant (0.8617 x 10-4ev/*k) using the values:
T1 = 140*F (the maximum specified normal service temperature) T2 = 250*F (determined to be an acceptable aging temperature which will not pro-duce abnormal thermal degradation) y l l l
l l
-A12-
- 9. QUALIFICATION TYPE-TEST PROCEDURE:
4 ( 9.4.1. -continued-tl = 8 years i 9 = 0.94 eV (the lowest reaction activation energy value determined for any of the critical organic components contained in the valves to be qualified. It is evident from the preceding equation, that the qualified life of coils and elastomeric l components in ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves will ex-ceed 8 years where normal service temperatures 4 are less than 140*F. In addition, the qualified life of coils and different elastomeric materials may vary depending on the reaction activation energy value determined for each material. The final test report will specify recommended re-placement periods for coils and all elastomeric components at various service temperatures as ( determined by calculations using the above equa-tion. 9.4.2. Wear Aging - At the conclusion of the thermal aging phase, the test valves shall be subjected to the remaining 90% (18,000 cycles) of wear aging. The total wear aging exercise of 20,000 cycles is felt to conservatively represent the total. number of operations expected during the i life of ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves. All wear aging shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements of Section 7.1 with nominal I voltage and maximum operation pressure dif-ferentials applied. Baseline tests shall be performed at the completion of the wear aging. 9.4.3. Pressurization Aging - Following completion of the wear aging phase, all test units shall be subjected to fifteen atmospheric to 80 psig ambient pressurization cycles to simulate the (~e , , 4 e 1
~_-
-_-__.-_--..-lL,.. . ._:__ - _. - - . . - . - . . . . . - - . . . . -
-A13-
- 9. QUALIFICATION TYPE-TEST PROCEDURE:
9.4.3. -continued- ) expected periodic pressurization of the con-tainment for leak testing during the life of the plant. The first cycle shall have a mini-mum dwell period of 24 hours at the 80 psig maximum pressure and each successive cycle shall have a minimum dwell period of 3 minutes. 9.4.4. Radiation Aging - Following pressurization aging, the test valves will be subjected to radiation aging which is intended to simulate the most severe maximum cumulative radiation dose ex-pected on the organic materials contained in ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves during normal periods of operation. Radiation aging shall consist of exposure to a Cobalt-60 7urce of gamma radiation with an average gamma energy of at least 1.0 MeV at a rate not to exceed 1 mega-rad per hour until a minimum actual air equi-valent dose of 20 megarads has been received. Baseline tests shall be performed at the comple-tion of this aging phase. 9.4.5. Vibration Aging - Following radiation aging, the test valves shall be subjected to vibra-tion aging which is intended to simulate the normal plant induced vibration expected during the life of ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves. The test valves shall be mounted to the shaker table and all electrical and pneumatic supply and control lines shall be attached in accordance with the requirements of Section 4. The table input motion shall be controlled by an accelerometer located on the valve mounting surface. The valves shall be operated under load before, during and after the test with sufficient monitoring equipment to verify functional
)
- operability. Vibration aging shall be accom-
i
-A14- - 9. QUALIFICATION TYPE-TEST PROCEDURE:
9.4.5. -continued-plished by the application of continuous sinusoidal motion having an acceleration level of 0.75g (except at low frequencies where the acceleration level should be ; reduced such that displacement does not l exceed 0.025 inches double amplitude) with the frequency c'ontinually sweeping ; from 5 to 200 to 5 Hz at a rate of 2 octaves per minute. Vibration shall be applied for a minimum of 90 minutes in each orthogonal axis. The test valves shall be alternately de-energized or energized every 15 minutes using nominal voltage and with maximum operating pres- l sure differential applied throughout this aging phase. OBE Simulation and Resonance Testing - ( 9.4.6. The OBE simulation is intended to pro-vide the mechanical aging equivalent of five operating basis earthquakes with peak acceleration levels as indicated in Section 8.1.6. This will be accomplished by expos-l ing the test valves to two sinusoidal sweeps f in each orthogonal axis (these sinusoidal sweeps are generally considered to provide the equivalent dynamic effect of five OBE's). Specifically, each test valve shall be mounted as described in Section 9.4.5 above and exposed to two sinusoidal sweeps at 2/3 of the RIM levels shown in Figure 9.1, in each ortho-gonal axis. Each sweep shall be from 1-35-1 Hz at a rate of not more than 1 octave per minuts. One~ sweep shall be performed with the valves energized and one with the valves de-energized. The OBE sweeps in each axis i
-A15- .
- 9. QUALIFICATION TYPE-TEST PROCEDURE:
9.4.6. -continued- ) may be followed by the SSE test in that axis. During OBE testing, each test valve shall be instrumented such that the data from this test will provide resonance search information. 9.5. DBE and Post DBE Simulation: Following the completion of all aging phases, the test valves shall be subjected to a simulation of DBE and post DBE occurrences which shall include seismic DBE simulation,. simulation of DBE radia-tion exposure and environmental DBE simulation. 9.5.1. Seismic Event Simulation - Seismic DBE simulation will consist of safe shut-down earthquake testing which is intended to demonstrate qualification of ASCO valves to the seismic conditions which are postulated for pipe mounted valves as a ; result of the dynamic response of the piping system during a SSE. Inis testing may exceed the acceleration level. indicated in Section 8.2.6 in order to define the actual seismic capability of each individual valve type by means of fragility testing. The test valves shall be mounted as de-scribed in Section 9.4.5 above and suit-able instrumentation shall be included for performance verification,. The valves shall then be exposed to a series of single frequency single axis line beat tests at the interval test tsuquencies indicated in Figure 9.1. At each test frequency, the excitation shall be in the form of a continuous series of sine beats of 12-15 oscillations per beat for a minimum duration of 15 seconds. The
-A16-
- 9. QUALIFICATION TYPE-TEST PROCEDURE:
9.5.1. -continued-
~
successive beats shall be phased such that any superposition of response motion will be additive. The minimum peak acceleration shall be the RIM value shown in Figure 9.1. At each test frequency, acceleration shall be increased and.the g-levels at which the cy3inder port pressure changes by 0, 5& 10% of the nominal value shall be recorded. (This testing goes beyond type testing and defines a fragility level at which the valve may be considered to still function properly. Although this level may vary depending on actual customer requirements, ASCO has selected a 10% change in cylinder port pres-sure as being insufficient to cause spurious shifting of a typical main valve or other device.) At aach test frequency, the maxi-( mum peak acceleration shall be 15g or the point where a 10% change in cylinder port pressure occurs, whichever is less. Operate each test valve through two complete ener-gized/de-energized cycles at each test fre- , quency and apply motion at the same fre-quencies and acceleration limits in each of the three orthogonal axes separately. The above described testing shall be con-ducted with each valve pressurized at its maximum operating pressure differential. The fragility levels determined by this testing are to be reduced by 10% to satisfy margin requirements. Perform baseline tests following the completion of the seismic event simulation. 9.5.2. DBE Radiation Simulation - Upon completion (
- A17-
- 9. QUALIFICATION TYPE-TEST PROCEDURE:
9.5.2. -continued-
)
of seismic DBE simulation, the test. valves shall be exposed to gamma radiation which is intended to demonstrate qualification to the radiation environment outlined in Section 8.2.5. Specifically, the test valves shall be exposed to a Cobalt-60 source of gamma radiation with an average gamma energy of at least 1.0 MeV at a rate not to exceed 1 megarad per hour until a
, minimum actual air equivalent dose of 180 megarads (163 megarads plus 10% margin) has been received. Baseli,ne tests shall be performed following completion of the above exposure.
9.5.3. Environmental DBE Simulation - Following completion of the DBE radiation simulation, the test valves shall be installed in a pressure chamber and subjected to a 30-day I exposure to steam, chemical spray and clear water spray simulating a combined loss-of-coolant accident /high-energy line break event and post-event cool-down. This simu-lation is intended to demonstrate qualifica-tion to the conditions outlined in Sections 8.2.1, 8.2.2, 8.2.3 and 8.2.4. The elec-trical lead wires and pneumatic connections for energizing, pressurizing and monitoring are to be brought out of the chamber and connected to monitoring equipment which is sufficient for recording all pertinent para-meters related to the event simulation. The electrical supply system shall include provi-sions such that the input voltage to each test valve can be adjusted separately. The electrical supply system shall also provide ; the capability for measurement of the volt-
-A18-l 9. QUALIFICATION TYPE-TEST PROCEDURE:
9.5.3. -continued-age and current applied to each test valve. Electrical leads from the test valves shall be fed through conduit of suitable quality for the expected environment to a suitable vented electrical junction box which is to be located within the test chamber. The con-duit/ junction box system shall be arranged such that the downward directed chemical spray of the simulation will not enter the system through any vent openings and any moisture which may accumulate within the conduit / junction box system will not enter the solenoid enclosures of the test valves. In addition, the exhaust ports of all test valves shall be connected to the test chamber atmosphere through 90' street elbows of suitable quality for the expected environ-( ment and of sufficient size so as to not cause restriction of'the exhaust flow from each test valve. These elbows shall also be oriented such that the downward directed chemical spray of the simulation will not enter the internal areas of the test valves through the exhaust ports. A typical piping arrangement for this simulation is shown in Figure 9.3. Prior to actually starting the exposure and before the test valves are installed, the chamber and associated equipment shall be tested to check for proper pressure sealing, to check for proper functioning of the spray system, and to insure that the system will adequately produce the required transient temperature and pressure conditions. After the test valves are installed in the pressure
-_- E ___ , _
-A19-
- 9. QUALIFICATION TYPE-TEST PROCEDURE:
9.5.3. -continued-
)
chamber but before the event simulation is started, all valves shall be tested under load for proper functioning to insure the adequacy of the test set up. The environ-mental DBE simulation is to follow the pres-sure/ temperature profile shown in Figure 9.2. Specifically, the test valves shall be main-tained continuously energized at nominal voltage for a minimum period of 4 hours in a 140*F ambient in order to produce thermal saturation of the test valve coils and to simulate typical pre-event conditions. The initial transient will be accomplished by rapidly admitting steam to the test chamber and will consist of an increase in tem-perature from the 140*F pretest ambient to l 420*F within 10 seconds. The 420*F tem-
)
perature shall be maintained for a period of 3 minutes and shall then be followed
. _ by a controlled drop to 365'F within a period of 1 minute with a dwell period of 6 minutes at 365*F. At this point, the temperature shall be decreased from 365'F to 346*F within 6 minutes and a dwell period of 2 hours and 48 minutes shall be maintained at that temperature. The dwell period at 346*F is to be followed by a con-trolled drop to 140*F within 2 hours with a dwell period of 1 hour at that temperature.
t A second temperature transient which will duplicate the first 3 hours of the first temperature transient shall then be ini-tiated. Following the dwell period at 346*F, the second temperature transient will con-tinue with a controlled temperature drop )
-A20- l l
; 9. QUALIFICATION TYPE-TEST PROCEDURE:
. 9.5.3. -continued- l frcm 346*F to 328'F within 30 minutes and I a dwell period of 1-3/4 hours at 328*F.
Following the dwell period at 328'F, a controlled temperature drop to 312*F shall be accomplished within 30 minutes and a dwell period of 12 hours and 15 minutes i shall be maintained at that temperature. Following the dwell at 312*F, a controlled temperature drop to 280*F shall be accom-plished within 30 minutes and a dwell period of 3-1/2 days shall be maintained at that temperature. Following the dwell period at 280*F, a controlled temperature drop to 265'F shall be accomplished, followed by a dwell at that temperature to the conclu-sion of 30-day test. The valves are to be ( cycled at the thes indicated on Figure 9.2. As indicated above, the valves will be main-tained energized for a period of 4 hours prior to the first transient in order to simulate normal plant operating conditions.
- When the chamber temperature of the first increasing transient reaches 420*F, all test valves will be de-energized in order to demonstrate their ability to perform a typical safety function (shifting upon
- de-energization). The valves will then l
l be maintained normally de-energized and cycled (energized and de-energize) as indicated in Figure 9.2. A chemical spray is to be included during the first l 24 hours of the simulation at the times indicated in Figure 9.2. The chemical spray solution shall con- {- sist of 3000 ppm of boron as boric acid m e 4 * *
-A21- l
- 9. QUALIFICATION TYPE-TEST PROCEDURE:
9.5.3. -continued- ) in solution with 0.064, molar sodium thio-sulfate buffered with sodium hydroxide to a pH of 10.5 (at room temperature). The pH of the solution shall be periodically checked and the solution shall be adjusted as required to maintain the pH at a value of 10.5. At 24 hours into the simulation, the chemical spray shall be terminated and a clear water spray shall be initiated. The clear water spray shall then be main-tained continuously to the conclusion of the 30-day simulation. The spray rate density for both the chemical and the clear water sprays shall be approximately 0.7 gpm per square foot of valve area projected in a horizontal plane. It is permissible to reduce the spray rate
)
density to 0.15 gpm per square foot of horizontally projected valve area, if desired, when the test chamber atmosphere is at superheat conditions. A 68 psig chamber pressure should be maintained during superheat steam conditions and pressure may correspond to saturation p'ressure for each particular temperature where saturated steam conditions are maintained. At the conclusion of the 30-day simula-tion, the test valves are to be subjected to baseline testing immediately following cool-down to room temperature and prior to removal from the test chamber. If any portion of the baseline testing cannot be conducted while the test valves are in-
- stalled in the test chamber, it should be !
-A 22-
- 9. QUALIFICATION TYPE-TEST PROCEDURE:
9.5.3. -continued- j conducted immediately following removal of the test valves. ; 9.6. Post Test Inspection and Disassembly: After completion of the entire test program, the valves shall be disassembled and visually inspected for degradation resulting from the exposure environ-ments. Photographs shall be taken as required to permanently document the physical condition of the test valves.
- 10. REPORTS AND CERTIFICATION:
At the completion of the entire test program, a re-port shall be written documenting the program, procedures, methods and results obtained. The report shall be certified as to radiation, seismic and environmental parameter values and also contain pertinent diagrams, photographs, test data sheets and a listing of recording equipment with calibration. (, data. All strip chart records are to be maintained and portions may be reproduced in the report, as required. A summary of the results shall be presented and shall include a statement regarding whether or not the solenoid valves were proven qualified.
t s TABLE 9.1 IDENTIFICATION OF TEST ITEMS r INCLUDED IN THIS QUALIFICATION PROGRAM ,. TEST GENERIC VALVE VALVE NO. FAMILY
- CATALOG NO. DESCRIPTION ,
1 VDSS 3.1 210-036-lF AC, Class 'H' leaded coil, steel body, explosion- i ' proof / watertight solenoid enclosure, normally
, closed, 3-way construction with ethylene propylene ;
elastomers and metal seating. 2 VDSS 3.1 K206-380-3RVF AC, Class 'H' screw terminal coil, brass body, watertight solenoid enclosure, normally closed,
. 3-way construction with Viton elastomers and resilient seating.
3 VDSS 3.1 206-381-6RF DC, Class 'H' leaded coil, brass body, explosion-proof / watertight solenoid enclosure, normally . closed, 3-way construction with ethylene propylene $ elastomers and resilient seating, y , s 4 VDSS 3.3 NP831655E AC, Class 'H' leaded coil, explosion-proof / water-tight solenoid enclosure, normally closed, 3-way construction with ethylene propylene elastomers. 5 VDSS 3.3 NPK8316A74V DC, Class 'H' screw terminal coil, watertight solenoid enclosure, normally closed, 3-way con-struction with Viton elastomers. 6 VDSS 3.3 WJNP8316E34E DC, Class 'H' leaded coil, watertight splice box solenoid enclosure, normally closed 3-way construc-tion with ethylene propylene elastomers. 7 VDSS 3.,5 NP8320A185V AC, Class 'H' leaded coil, brass body, explosion-proof / watertight solenoid enclosure, normally , closed, 3-way construction with Viton elastomers.
- Refer to Appendix AI
%M %
A A TABLE 9.1 - IDENTIF.ICATION OF TEST ITEMS INCLUDED IN THIS QUALIFICATION PROGRAM
-continued-l l TEST GENERIC VALVE VALVE NO. FAMILY
- CATALOG NO. DESCRIPTION 8 VDSS 3.5 NP832063E DC, Class 'H' leaded coil, stainless steel body, watertight solenoid enclosure, normally closed,
. 3-way construction with ethylene propylene elastomers.
9 VDSS 3.6 NP8321A2V DC, Class 'H' leaded coil, watertight solenoid enclosure, normally closed, 3-way construction with Viton elastomers. 10 VDSS 3.7 NP8323A38V Solenoid 'A' AC, Solenoid 'B' DC, Class 'H' leaded coils, explosion-proof / watertight solenoid enclosures, normally closed, 3-way construction with Viton elastomers.
.f' 11 VDSS 3.8 NP8344A70V AC, Class 'H' leaded coil, watertight solenoid enclosure, 4-way, single solenoid construction with viton elastomers.
12 VDSS 3.8 NP8344B68E DC, Class 'H' leaded coils, explosion-proof / watertight solenoid enclosure, 4-way dual solenoid construction with ethylene propylene elastomers. 13 VDSS 3.2 NP8314C28V DC, Class 'H' leaded coil, explosion-proof / watertight solenoid enclosure, normally closed, 3-way construction with Viton elastomers and metal upper seat. 14 VDSS 3.4 NP8317A29V DC, Class 'H' leaded coil, explosion-proof / watertight solenoid enclosure, normally closed, 3-way construction with Viton elastomers and metal upper seat.
- Refer to Appendix AI
NN/ , 'N A 'xX'x% / / Nl\ s
~
go REQUIRED INPUT M) l s% g \ /\ \/ / a;f s /
/
X'm'x / ^ , t* y0cW p
\( '
\
\\
/ \ / e 4 \ s \
!~ X/ An 'N_g 'v'X 'AF
/ "
N xx s
/ <
N .\. 4I . 1.25
. . i . . .. . . /j . ..... .....
1.6 2 2.5 3.2 OWELL POINTS 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 16 22 33 9 j,
= Y3OCTAVE INTERVALS = =
INTEGRAL INTERVALS = FREQUENCY, CPS SEISMIC QUALIFICAT/0M REQUIREO INPUT MOTION F 'URE 9.1
, O A .A
$ t % %
iL5 l4 {y ai 4 1i5 {;L JL {ny ual }3 t u it u}AAiL
} } } } A yw yj p y t ,y U3 y. 9 $ ( t t t u
%
- 4o n ENERG/EE-OEEMER6/EE
- 1 CYCLE TEST 450 - NOTEf: APPLY 132/40(ACVALVE2 OR . : y 420'fl'* PS'* 140/x(pcwflVES)fM TN/SCVCLE x] ONLY FORJLL OTHERCYClE$ APPLY TEST VCl[4GE AS DdF/NEO IN 400-- \
ass *F/68 PS/G 3GS*flG8 PS/G
\ /
/ -344;*fllf3p3;G sectioN G.2.f.
-346*F//13 PSIG g 350 - Y \ f 32a'F/85PStG m : \/g / 3f2*r/CSPSIG K
w 3gn _- , 280*F/36 PSIG u. W f zss*F/24 PS/G , g - \ / > k 2" . g - 4 : N 200T _ (SO f140*Fl0PSIG CLEAR GATE.K SPRAY
~
CHEMICAL SPRAY IOO
- f cHwicAL SPRAY 1 1 i i 1 ( i i e 4 i i 14: i i iiii iiiiiei iii # iiiiiiii 0 10 40 2 4 10 12 3 5 6 to 40 2341012 9 12 242345 10 20 30 l-SEC l MINUTES l H00RS l ZEChM1At/TES l -HOURS l DAYS l TIME ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION PARAMETERS FOR COMBINED LOSS-OF-COOLANTACCIDENT (LOCA)/H/GH ENERGY LINE BREAK (NELB) SIMULATION F/GURE 9.2 J
\
-A 2 7-F/GURE 9. 3 >
TYP/ CAL P/PE SCHEMA 7M FDR LOCA/NELB S/MULAT/DN Y* P ? E f [ TANK
)
& GAGE 3 -WA Y l
P h5E lh$ ei l c)-c) GASE 4-WA Y l s l
~ Autoittatic Switch Co. oeJE;MIRm NRPM FLORH AM PARK NEW JERSEY 07932 . N J.-I201! 966 2OOO / N.Y.-12121344-3765 APPENDIX AI VALVE DESIGN SPECIFICATION SHEETS BULLETIN NUMBER VDSS NUMBER PAGE 206-380 3.1 AI-l 206-381 3.1 AI-l 206-832 3.1 AI-l 208-266 3.1 AI-l 208-448 3.1 AI-l 210-036 3.1 AI-l NP8314 3.2 AI-3 NP8316 3.3 AI-5 NP8317 3.4 AI-7 NP8320 3.5 AI-9 NP8321 3.6 AI-ll NP8323 3.7 AI-13 NP8344 3.8 AI-15
y - - AI-l VDSS 3.1 BULLETIN 206-380, 206-381, 206-832 208-448, 208-266 AND 210-036 VALVES DESCRIPTION: Three-way, direct acting solenoid valve with packless construction. APPLICATION: Pilot valve controlling instrument quality air. SPECIFICATIONS: Constructions: Normally open, normally closed or universal. Pipe Sizes: 1/8", 1/4", 3/8" or 1/2" NPT. Body Materials: Brass, steel or stainless steel. Seating: Metal or resilient. Solenoid
Enclosures:
Watertight or explosion-proof / watertight with 3/4" or 1/2" NPT conduit connection. Elastomers: Ethylene propylene'or Viton. Power Ratings: 20 watts AC, 35.1 watts DC. Coils: Class 'H'. Process Fluid:. Instrument quality air (must be free of petroleum based oils and compounds when valves with ethylene propylene elastomers are used). Ambient: 32-140"F. Installation: Valve must be mounted with solenoid vertical and upright. Normal Main-tenance Schedule: Periodic replacement of coils and elastomeric components is required. Recommended replace-ment periods will be established following completion of this qualification program. Safe Working Pressure: 600 psig for brass body construction, 1500 psig for steel and stainless steel body constructions. i
t A O O SPECIFIC VALVE DESIGNATIONS INCLUDED IN VDSS 3.1 GENERIC FAMILY DIFFERE2 TRIAL f BASIC CATAIOG NUMBER OPERATING EXPIOSION-PROOF / WMunGff PIPE ORIFICE BODY ( NATERTIGIT SOIDDID SIZE SIZE WMTS PRESSURE MNIERIAL (NPT) (INDIES) AC DC Cv (PSI) SQL. ENCLOSURE ENCIOSURE 20 .35 200 Brass HVA-206-832-1 HVA-206-380-1 1/8 3/16 Brass 3/16 20 .35 200
-2 -2 1/4 Brass 1/4 20 .45 150
-3 -3 1/4 200 Brass 3/8 3/16 20 .35
-4 -4
.45 150 Brass
-5 3/8 1/4 20
-5 100 Brass 3/8 5/16 20 .75
-6 -6
.75 100 Brass
" -7 U -7 1/2 5/16 20 3/16
~~
.35 200 Steel HVA-210-036-1 HVA-208-266-1 3/8 i Steel 1/4 2f .45 150
~2 -2 3/8 100 Steel
-3 3/8 5/16 20 .75
-3 5/16 20 .75 100 Steel
-4 -4 1/2 St. Steel
~
5/16 20 .75 100 V -5 1F -5 1/2 200 Brass Y 1/8 3/16 35.1 .35 " HVA-206-381-1 35.1 .35 200 Brass
-2 1/4 3/16 Brass 1/4 1/4 35.1 .45 150
-3 35.1 .35 200 Brass
-4 3/8 3/16 Brass 1/4 35.1 .45 150
-5 3/8 Brass 3/8 5/16 35.1 .75 125 9
-6 35.1 .75 125 Brass
-7 1/2 5/16 Steel 3/16 35.1 .35 200 HVA-208-448-1 3/8 Steel-1/4 35.1 .45 150
-2 3/8 125 Steel 3/8 5/16 35.1 .75
-3 35.1 .75 125 Steel
-4 1/2 5/16 5/16 35.1 .75 125 St. Steel T -5 1/2
*No Minimum Operating Pressure Differential is Required.
CATALOG NUMBER PREFIXES CATALOG NUMBER SUFFIXES
= Splice Box Solenoid Enclosure R = Resilient Seating F = Normally Closed.
WJ (Watertight Solenoid only) Construction V = Viton Elastomers G= rmally Open K = Screw Terminal Coih MO = Manual Operator Construction (Watertight Solenoid Only) U = Universal Construc-tion
7 1 P'-3 I l I
> \
l l 1 VDSS 3.2 BULLETIN NP8314 VALVES DESCRIPTION: Three-way, direct acting solenoid valve
.with packless construction.
APPLICATION: Pilot valve controlling instrument quality air. SPECIFICATIONS: Con'structions: Normally open, normally closed or universal. Pipe Size: 1/4" NPT. Body Material: Brass. Seating: Comoination metal and resilient or all metal. Solenoid
Enclosures:
Watertight or explosion-proof / watertight with 3/4" or 1/2" NPT conduit connection. Elastomers: Ethylene propylene or Viton. ) Power Ratings: 11 watts AC, 17.4 watts DC Coils: Class 'H'. Process Fluid: Instrument quality air (must be free of petroleum based oils and compounds when valves with ethylene propylene elastomers are used. Ambient: 32-140*F. Installation: Can'be installed in any position without affecting operation. Qualification testing to be conducted with solenoid vertical and upright. Normal Main-tenance Schedule: Periodic replacement of coils and elastomeric components is required. Recon. mended replace-ment periods will be established following completion of this qualification program. Safe Working Pressure: 750 psig. i
-. .,, . . - - ~ - - , , , , , , . . , , , . - . . . - , . . . , . , . - . , , , , .-- , . - , - . - - -- --- ,. -.
1 D '& .D. SPECIFIC VALVE DESIGNATIONS INCLUDED IN VDSS 3.2 GENERIC FAMILY ! (BULLETIN NP8314) max 1Mm ' DNE BASIC CATAIOG NEBER EXPIOSION-PIOOF/ PIPE ORIFIG PRESSURE
- WNIERTIGrr SIZE SIZE WNITS (PSI) 901ENDID ENCIOSURE (NPF) (IN W ES) AC DC Cu AC DC NRM NP8314Cl3 1/4 3/64 11.0 17.4 0.04 160 70 Univ.
C14 3/32 ** 80 35 Univ. C28 3/64 0.04 175 120 N.C. 7 C29 3/32 ** 125 60 N.C. 061 3/64 0.04 175 175 N.O.
" ** 175 70 N.O.
C62 3/32
*No Minimum Operating Pressure Required CATALOG NUMBER SUFFIXES E = Ethylene Propylene Elastomers se i (S i r V')
and 0.15 for valves with V = Viton Elastomers (Suffix
] ""h, eating L = Metal Seating
I AI-5
)
VDSS 3.3 BULLETIN NP8316 VALVES DESCRIPTION: ' Three-way solenoid operated internally piloted. APPLICATION: Pilot valve controlling instrument quality airs SPECIFICATIONS: Constructions: Normally closed or normally open. Pipe Sizes: 3/8", 1/2", 3/4" or 1" NPT. Body Material: Brass Seating: Resilient Solenoid
Enclosures:
Watertight or explosion-proof / watertight with 3/4" or 1/2" NPT conduit connection. Elastomers: Ethylene propylene or Viton. Power Ratings: 10.5 watts AC, 17.4 watts DC. Coils: Class 'H'. , Process Fluid: Instrument quality air (must be free of petroleum based oils and compounds when valves with ethylene propylene elastomers are used). Ambient: 32-140'F. Installation: Can be installed in any position without
. affecting operation. Qualification testing to.be conducted with solenoid vertical and upright.
Normal Main-tenance Schedule: Periodic replacement of coils and elastomeric components is required. Recommend replacement periods will be established following comple-tion of this qualification program. Safe Working Pressure: 250 psig.
~
D. O ,O SPECIFIC VALVE DESIGNATIONS INCLUDED IN VDSS 3.3 GENERIC FAMILY (BULLETIN NP8316) ( Dm M M BASIC CATAILG NUMBER OPERATIE EXPIDSION-PROOF WATERTIGHT PIPE ORIFICE PRESSURE WMHITIGfr SOIINDID SIZE SIZE WMTS (PSI) 90L. ENC [DSURE DKIOSURE (NPT) (INQES) AC DC Cv MAX. MIN. FORM NP831655 NP831654 3/8 5/8 10.5 17.4 3 175 10 NC ' NP831665 NP831664 1/2 5/8 10.5 17.4 4 175 10 NC NP8316A75 NP8316A74 3/4 11/16 10.5 17.4 5.5 175 10 NC NP8316E35 NP8316E34 1- 1 10.5 17.4 13 175 10 NC NP831657 NP831656 3/8 5/8 10.5 17.4 3 175 10 NO NP831667 NP831666 1/2 5/8 10.5 17.4 4 175 10 NO NP8316A77 NP8316A76 3/4 11/16 10.5 17.4 5.5 175 10 NO p 1 1 10.5 17.4 13 175 10 NO H NP8316E37 NP8316E36 m CATALOG NUMBER PREFIXES CATAI N' NUMBER SUFFIXES WJ = Splice Box Solenoid Enclosure E = Ethylene Propylene Elastomers (Watertight Solenoid Only) V = Viton Elastomers K = Screw Terminal Coil MO = Manual Operator (Watertight Solenoid only)
r - m AI-7
)
VDSS 3.4 BULLETIN NP8317 VALVES DESCRIPTION: Three-way, direct acting, quick exhaust solenoid valve with packless construction. APPLICATION: Pilot valve controlling instrument quality air. SPECIFICATIONS: Constructions: Normally open, normally closed or universal. Pipe Size: 1/4" NPT. Body Material: Brass. Seating: Combination metal and resilient. Solenoid
Enclosure:
Watertight or explosion-proof / watertight with 3/4" or 1/2" NPT conduit connection.
')
Elastomers: Ethylene propylene or Viton. Power Ratings: 11 watts AC, 17.4 watts DC. Coils: Class 'H'. Process Fluid: Instrument quality air (must be free of petroleum based oils and compounds when valves with ethylene propylene elastomers are used. Ambient: 32-140*F. Installation: Can be installed in any position without affecting operation. Qualification testing to be conducted with solenoid vertical and upright. Normaly Main-tenance Schedule: Periodic replacement of coils and elastomeric components is required. Recommended replace-ment periods will be established following completion of this qualification program. i
\
a
[E M F i v . . C. O. O O F Un N N E R N I U D 5 5 5 S E N I F R M
)
I Y S 5 5 P MC 0 7 7 L ( J D 4 I M I M X A P AC 0 5 0 6 F O MA 8 2 1 1 C I r 3 R T 7 E a Y N V 0 E G s v' r 4 C E e
. R m 3 1 0 0 5 o 9 2 2 1 S t S S E s S E F
0 0 0 X a D P I l V ) F E 7 F N 1 4 U e I 3 C S n 8 D e s D P 1 R ly re E N d E p m D r ~ B
^ U L
N I A W C A 0 1 Y M U o o r t C T 1 N P s N E a I L G e l L T " O nE S U N 4 Y L e N (B E V
/
l A l n T y o O E Z )S I IE A h t T SI I l C t i A C E E V N EN R3 " G CI I( 9 2 = = I S F R E V E I E R P 3 P D O E V ) L EE T "4 A PZ II N( / 1 P Y V PS C I F I C E E R P / U S N G F O O R S n i
'r _
2 P N 4 9 O T E 1 2 6 I A NI A A A T OG D 7 I 1 7 1 7 1 A II 3 C Sf O K O38 3 8 8 s C I I t P RPN I P N P N S O e' A B XE E S a lIIlli 1l l i llI
AI-9 I VDSS 3.5 BULLETIN NP8320 VALVES DESCRIPTION: Three-way, direct acting, packless, compact solenoid valve with all three connections in valve body for in-line piping. APPLICATION: Pilot valve controlling instrument quality air. SPECIFICATIONS: Constructions: Normally open, normally closed or universal. Pipe Size: 1/4" NPT. Body Material: Brass or stainless steel. Seating: Resilient. Solenoid l
Enclosures:
l Watertight or explosion-proof / watertight with 3/4" or 1/2" NPT conduit connection. Elastomers: Ethylene propylene or Viton. ' l Power Ratings: 10.5 watts AC, 17.4 watts DC. Coils: Class 'H'. Process Fluid: Instrument quality air (must be free of petroleum based oils and compounds when valves with ethylene propylene elastomers are used). Ambient: 32-140'F. Installation: Can be installed in any position without affecting operation. Qualification testing to be upright.conducted with solenoid vertical and Normall Main-tenance Schedule: Periodic replacement of coils and elastomeric components is required. Recommend replace-ment periods will be established following completion of this qualification program. , Safe Working ' Pressure: 300 psig. 9
l' yye## O L A . . . . . . . I . . t t t t t t t t t x s S S S S S S S S S t s s ss s s ss s s s s l ss s s ss s s s s . . . . .. . r aa . . A s s M ar ar aa a a aa a a t t t e rr r r rr r r r r t t t t t t S S S Y B B BB B B BB B B B B S S S S S S m o D t O s B a
. l Y . .
v E v v l L I M v v vv i i i i C C C O oO i i i OO S e M A R CC D NN CC NN O N O N NN nU n U nn N N N N t U nU nU UU N n E n F F X e s l r r I F y e o C F p mt I R [ 50 5 0 0 U o o a r t r E L 5 5 0 50 5 0 52 5 5 0 5 64 6 4 2 S A3* C 05 0 2 3 0 53 7 6 21 21 6 4 12 P sa ep N INE D 61 6 1 1 R E TIR) 11 G E el O NTUI EA SS B n E 5 KR sP 0 0 0 0 0 M e l tE e( C 4 05 5 5 0 0 0 5 5 3502 52 01 04 5 1 4 0 4 3 U ly no au 2 i Pl A 7 58 4 71 41 7 4 21 7 N 3 1 1 1 1 1 FOP I 1 1 h t n S D G t i a O E V M S 9 18951951951 0 5113 8 39 05 11 3839 05 L D V ) C y . 133013013013 A = = = T A O 4 44 4 4 44 4 4 .4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 N 0 C E V M I 2 3 C . 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 1 7 1 17 71 7 1 1 7 17 1 1 1 1 1 l_7 D 8 S D 7 7 7 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 E P T 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 D N t 5 5 5 5 5 55 5 5 5 5 U k 0 0 0 0 0
^, L N NC A 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 C I 1 1 1 1 1 11 d N T e I E r L i S L u q
6 2 N U B G 6 2 4 6 2 4 6 2 4 6 2 3 8 6 1 3 8 13 62 8 1 3 8 e O I 1 3 8 6 1 3 8 6 1 R I T ( FI R
/////////// 1//////////
1 3 1 11 1 3 1 11 1 31 1 1 3 1 13 1 1 3 1 A O ~ e N r G u e I s S s r E E P 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 44 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 e u D I /////////// P 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
////////// r P
s) oy
)
l y ll E g cn n V n nO o L E
~
A i 24 6 8 24 6 3 2 46 8 t d d V f f 9 9 7 7 7 7 E 88 8 8 99 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 57 59 96 75 95 16 a di li E dD R AA 11 A1 A1 AA 11 A A A A A A 6 9 66 0 0 0 0 0 r i oio C I II U fD S 00 0 0 00 0 22 0 22 00 20 20 20 20 22 00 23 32 32 32 32 eS pE on neCe l on F aN 22 2 2 22 33 3 3 33 3 3 33 3 3 3 3 33 8 8 8 8 8 el 88 8 8 88 8 8 88 PP 8 P8 P 8P 8P 88 I tE rm P P P P P O XI lolo C iL NO N PP P N P NN P PP N N NN P PP N NNNN mF oS aS E P WS E NN N N N N N NN uE S n S mR t it i P xh og rg mh n Bi ei
/ i R F
O M E ert Tt r B O R E R oM ce we N U it et P U 3 5 7 9 35 7 9 35 7 9 la ra
- T S 8 8 8 8 99 9 9 77 7 7 1 1 4 4 68 6 0 8 0 2
- N pW cW Nl 1 1 11 1 1 11 9 7 5 6 6 OG II m
r 1 1 A A A A A A A A 00 AA 0A 0A 6 0 9 66 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 G S( S( N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 22 2 2 2 O Sf 2 2 2 2 2 22 2 2 3 33 3 3 3 3 3 L = D u E. 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 3 3 3 8 88 8P 8P 8P 8P 8P
=
A I t L 3 3 8 8 8 8 8 8 83 8 8 8 A Pi 8 8 P PP P P P P PP T XR O EN S P N NP NP N PNPNPNPN NN N N N N NN N N N N N A J CW K fl fifjjl[tL /I l ' ' ll
1 AI-ll l l i
)
i VDSS 3.6 BULLETIN NP8321 VALVES DESCRIPTION: Three-way, internally piloted quick exhaust solenoid valve with packless construction. APPLICATION: Pilot valve controlling instrument quality air. SPECIFICATIONS: Constructions: Normally open or normally closed. Pipe Sizes: 1/4" or 3/8" NPT. , Body Material: Brass Seating: Resilient Solenoid
Enclosures:
Watertight or explosion-proof / watertight ! with 3/4" or 1/2" NPT conduit connection. Elastomers: Ethylene propylene or Viton. j Power Ratings: 10.5 watts AC, 17.4 watts DC. ! Coils: Class 'H'. Process Fluid: Instrument quality air (must be free of petroleum based oils and compounds when ! valves with ethylene propylene elastomers are used). Ambient: 32-140'F. Installation: Can be installed in any position without
- affecting operation. Qualification testing
! to be conducted with solenoid vertical and upright. Normal Main-tenance l Schedule: Periodic replacement of coils and elastomeric l components is required. Recommended replace- i ! ment periods will be established following I I l completion of this qualification program. Safe Working l Pressure: 200 psig. i
1
^ ,A
^
SPECIFIC VALVE DESIGNATIONS INCLUDED IN VDSS 3.6 GENERIC FAMILY (BULLETIN NP8321) l Dim.;MtNFIAL OPERATItG PRESSURE EXPIOSION- (PSI) PROOF WNTERTIGff PIPE ORIFICE SIZE WNITS Cy MAX. NATERTIGIT SOLEtOID SIZE (INOP ") AC DC MIN. FORM PPFSRJRE EX11AUSP AC DC Put;SSURE EXIIAUSP SOL.ENCLOSUFZ DKIOSURE (NPT) 10.5 17.4 0.8 1.2 150 150 15 NC NP8321A5 NP8321A1 1/4 9/32 11/32 10.5 17.4 150 150 15 NC p NP8321A6 NP8321A2 3/8 10.5 17.4 150 150 15 NO NP8321A7 NP8321A3 1/4 y y y y NP8321A4 3/8 10.5 17.4 150 150 15 ND NP8321A8 CATALOG NUMBER PREFIXES CATALOG NUMBER SUFFIXES WJ = Splice Box Solenoid Enclosure E = Ethylene Propylene Elastomers (Watertight Solenoid only) V = Viton Elastomers K = Screw Terminal Coil MO = Manual Operator (Watertight Solenoid Only
( -. AI-13
)
VDSS 3.7 BULLETIN NP8323 VALVES DESCRIPTION: Three-way, direct acting, packless solenoid valve with redundant solenoids. APPLICATION: Pilot valves controlling instrument quality air. SPECIFICATIONS: Constructions: Normally open or normally closed. Pipe Size: 1/4" NPT Body Material: Brass Seating: Resilient Solenoid
Enclosures:
Watertight or explosion-prood/ watertight with 3/4" or 1/2" NPT conduit connection. Elastomers: Ethylene propylene or Viton. Power Ratings: 10.5 watts AC, 17.4 watts DC. Coils: Class 'H' Process Fluid: Instrument quality air (must be free of petroleum based oils and compounds when valves with ethylene propylene elastomers are used). Ambient: 32-140*F Installation: Valve must be mounted with solenoid 'A' vertical and upright. Normal Main-tenance Schedule: Periodic replacemcnt of coils and clastomeric components is required. Recommended replace-ment periods will be established following completion of this qualification program. Safe Working Pressure: 500 psig I
]
R D O ( SPECIFIC VALVE DESIGNATION INCLUDED IN VDSS 3.7 GENERIC FAMILY (BULLETIN NP8323) J WNns MAXIbiM EKPIDSION- SOL. D m txtNTIAL WATERTIGIT PIPE ORIFICE EDL. PICOP OPERATIFG SOIENDID SIZE SIZE A B WATERTIGTI PRESSURE
- FOIN DU N (NPT) (INQIES) AC AC DC Cv SQL.D e nSURE 10.5 10.5 .09 125 NC '
NP8323A20 NP8323A19 1/4 1/16 NC 10.5 10.5 .15 80 NP8323A22 NP8323A21 1/4 3/32 1/8 10.5 10.5 .31 40 NC NP8323A24 NP8323A23 1/4 125 FD y 1/16 10.5 10.5 .09 _NF8323A28 NP8323A27 1/4 10.5 10.5 .15 110 NO y NP8323A30 NP8323A29 1/4 3/32 to e 10.5 10.5 .31 40 ^ NP8323A32 NP8323A31 1/4 1/8 NC 1/16 10.5 17.4 .09 125 NP8323A36 NP8323A35 1/4 80 NC NP8323A37 1/4 3/32 10.5 17.4 .15 NP8323A38 .31 40 NC NP8323A39 1/4 1/8 10.5 17.4 __ NP8323A40 ' 17.4 .09 125 NO NP8323A44 NP8323A43 1/4 1/16 10.5 10.5 17.4 .15 100 NO NP8323A46 NP8323A45 1/4 3/32 to 10.5 17.4 .31 40 NP8323A48 NP8323A47 1/4 1/8
*No Minimum Operating Pressure Differential is Required CATALOG NUMBER SUFFIXES CATALOG NUMBER PREFIXES WJ = Splice Box Solenoid Enclosure E = Ethylene Propylene Elastomers (Watertight Solenoid Only) V = Viton Elastomers K = Screw Terminal Coil (Watertight Solenoid Only)
)
AI-15 ) (
)
\
VDSS 3.8 BULLETIN NP8344 VALVES DESCRIPTION: Four-way, two position, internal pilot operated, poppet type solenoid valve with packless construction. APPLICATION: Pilot valve controlling instrument quality air. SPECIFICATIONS: Constructions: Single or dual solenoid. Pipe Sizes: 1/4", 3/8", 1/2", 3/4" and l" NPT. Body Material: Brass { Seating: Resilient Solenoid
Enclosures:
Watertight or explosion-proof / watertight with 3/4" or 1/2" NPT conduit connection. Elastomers: Ethylene propylene or Viton. Power Ratings: 10.5 watt AC, 17.4 watt DC. Coil: Class 'H' Process l Fluid: Instrument quality air (must be free of petroleum based oils and compounds when valves with ethylene propylene elastomers l are used). Ambient: 32-140'F. Installation: Can be installed in any position without affecting operation. Qualification testing to be conducted with solenoid (s) vertical and upright. Normal Main-tenance Schedule: Periodic replacement of coils and elastomeric components is required. Recommended replace-ment periods will be established following completion of this qualification program. Safe Working Pressure: 1/4", 3/8" & 1/2" NPT valves....... 450 psig 3/4" & 1" NPT valves............... 300 psig
^
l m O m SPECIFIC VALVE DESIGNATION INCLUDED IN VDSS 3.8 GENERIC FAMILY (BULLETIN NP8344) dim.HtNTIAL OPERATING PRESSURE EXPIOSION-PROOF PIPE ORIFICE (PSI) WATERPIGff SIZE SIZE WMTS Cv MAX. WMERTIGTP MIN. TYPE SOL.DringJRE (NPT) (INWES) AC DC PRESS. E)Gl. AC DC I SOL.ENCIOSURE 1/4 10.5 17.4 0.8 1.0 125 125 10 Single Solenoid NP8344A71 NP8344A70 1/4 Single Solenoid 3/8 10.5 17.4 1.4 2.2 125 125 10 NP8344A73 NP8344A72 3/8 Single Solenoid 3/8 10.5 17.4 1.4 2.2 125 125 10 NP8344A75 NP8344A74 1/2 Single Solenoid NP8344A77 NP8344A76 3/4 3/4 10.5 17.4 5.2 5.6 125 125 10 10.5 17.4 5.2 5.6 125 125 10 Single Solenoid NP8344A79 NP8344A78 1 3/4 NP8344B46 1/4 1/4 10.5 17.4 0.8 1.0 350 125 10 Dual Solenoid p NP8344B58 Dual Solenoid H 3/8 3/8 10.5 17.4 1.4 2.2 300 125 10 NP8344B62 ND8344B50 O NP8344B52 1/2 3/8 10.5 17.4 1.4 2.2 300 125 10 Dml Solenoid
- NP8344B64 Dual Solenoid NP8344B66 NP8344B54 3/4 3/4 10.5 17.4 5.2 5.6 300 125 10 NP8344B56 1 3/4 10.5 17.4 5.2 5.6 300 125 10 Dual Solenoid NP8344B68 CATALOG NUMBER PREFIXES CATALOG NUMBER SUFFIXES WJ = Splice Box Solenoid Enclosure E = Ethylene Propylene Elastomers (Watertight Solenoid Only) V = Viton Elastomers K = Screw Terminal Coil MO = Manual Operator (Watertight Solenoid Only)
J
Auto 11tutic Switch Co. ee=rm EffE Since 1888 FLORHAM PARK.NEW JERSEY 07032 N J.-12011966 2OOQ / N.Y-12121344-3765 l l l l l l APPENDIX AII COIL INSULATION RESISTANCE AND DIELECTRIC STRENGTH MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES PROCEDURE PAGE Coil Insulation Resistance Measurement AII-l Coil Dielectric Strength Measurement AII-l l _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ = _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
AII-l Measurement of Coil Insulation Resistance: The solenoid coil insulation resistance shall be measured at each baseline test using a Freed Model 1620 Megohmmeter or suitable equivalent. The coil leads are to be twisted together and connected to one of the megohmmeter leads. The other megohm-meter lead is to be connected to a clean metallic part of the solenoid housing. The applied voltage during the measurement shall be 500 volts DC and the limits of acceptability are as defined in Section 6.1.3.1 of this specification. Measurement of Coil Dielectric Strength: The solenoid coil dielectric strength shall be measured at each baseline test using an Associated Research Type 404 Hypot Tester or suitable equivalent. The coil leads are to ( be twisted together and connected to one of the tester leads. The other tester lead is to be connected to a clean metallic part of the solenoid housing. The applied voltage shall be twice the nominal voltage of the valve plus 1000 volts AC. This voltage shall be applied for one minute. The limits of acceptability are as defined in Section 6.1.3.2 of this specification. (. . t _A * - + -
.g -
Anl~O111dliC Switch Co. eea= = ao EYJE Since 1888
)
FLORHAM PARK NEW JERSEY 07932 N.J.-(20tl 006 2OOO/ N.Y.-12121 W-3785 APPENDIX AIII INDIVIDUAL VALVE TEST PROCEDURES BULLETIN NUMBER TEST PROCEDURE NUMBER 206-380 TP-3-046 206-381 TP-3-046 206-832 TP-3-046 208-266 TP-3-046 208-448 TP-3-046 210-036 TP-3-046 ) NP8314 TP-NP8314 NP8316 TP-NP8316 NP8317 TP-NP8317 NP8320 TP-NP8320 NP8321 TP-NP8321 NP8323 TP-NP8323 NP8344 TP-NP8344
.__m___.2--.2._______._
~ _
v.u : - NO. a ot*ChOmd,fISSUEnuv s . P ~ .. n 1P.3.one .
,. ... c dlllOIlll(IlalCbul{i.hCo..
CH ANGI LET T ER
,a O f <. O APP pt N / f I V ALVE ENGINEEmNG DEPT. O j c.n Q /s S sv I' / Tir.E HVA-206-360,:iV A *.'06-331' a O! .O Dart issutc PAGE OF 2
( 1 TE3T PROCEEURE: ny ,.,. *g' . :.s . t. :: a y' l'r. . n % . 'v r.'O 7N, .O9. . ; ,6/?l/77
. . . r..F 3 ,
These valves frequently contain Ethylene Propylene clastomers.. . TEST MEDIUM:
^
Test on oil free, filtered air only. 1. Check general construction and appearance of valve. GENERAL: ifications. 2. Check nameplate data for conformance to shop order spec TJ-537-9075 TA-981-11448 TA-905-9984 P38 Valves TEST TIXTURES P37 Valves TJ-905-10168 AT-8300C-T-1 d TEST VOLTAGE _ 1. All D.C. valves are to be tested using the test current liste AND CURRENT: i d 2. under the specified voltage on Data Sheet No. 26.All A on Test Procedure IP-1-003. Value 1. A.C. - Energize solenoid and check milliampere reading. COIL TESTS: should agree with that shown on Data Sheet No. 24. Value should
- 2. D.C. - Energize solenoid and check voltage reading. indicated agree with that volt 3ge to be twice the rated voltaEe plus
(. 3. Dielectric test - Tect 1000 volts A.C. for a period of one (1)~ minutei in accordanc TP-1-002 (Test nethod #1). or current leakage in excess of 0.5 milliampere (Test light sens - tivity setting) is cause for rejection. i td EXTERNAL Apply seamtest solution to all joints and pressurine resil ent-sea eP.D.,both LEAKAGEi valve to M.O.P.D. , metal-seated valve to 1-1/2 M.O.Any bubbling and de-energized. (Ref: TP-1-009). of dirt To avoid seat leakage or noise caused i by the ssurepossible thru thepresence valve NOTE: or loose chips, blow air at maximum operat ng pre before proceeding with tests below. Allowable Check valve for seat leakage at maximum operating pressure. SEAT LEAKAGE , leakage: IIIICH Resilient Seats - 0 PRESSURE)
- 1.5 SCTH Metal Seats Any chattering or During the operational tests, check valve for noie,e. j ction. Va've NOISE TEST: rattling in excess of normal A.C. hum is reason for re ebe increased to (Ref.
should full line be tested at test voltage first, but voltar.c mayvoltag
~
TP-1-015) ( . r .= v.t. m n
. . .%.19i:
nf= 0 f\ {ll O lll(lll C S W ilt. b C O. ,, a ,a i ne. i G Et Ji D fly n . i>. - u NO. VALVE ENGINEEfilNG DEPT. Tr-1-onc DEE ,u 6 .s ([ air, , / , CHANGE LETTER TEST PROCEDURE: HVA-206-350 liVA-20E-M1 "' "" U ' HVA-209-449 !!?A- 4 G i '. O- DATE ISSUED Hva-?ns-cgy,uva 208-26G 210 au ) C3 cs O 6/21/77 PAGE 2 05 , I OPERATIONAL , TESTS: 1. Operate valve at least 10 times at maximum operating pressure . 2. Operate valve operating from maximum operating pressure down to minimum pressure. !t L I SEAT LEAKAGE ( LOW PRESSUR t ' Cneck seat leakage at 10 psi. I Allowable leakage: Resilient Seats - 0 ( Metal Seats - 1.5 SCFH PREPARATION _FOR SHIPMENT leads around bonnet. Seal all pipe connections with plastic thread protectors an n coil have a 'v' suffix. Attach tag FV-206-825-1 to all valves that do not 1 CORRECTIVE ACTION RECORD: Maintain Test Log (Form 1109) on all large production runs . i f ERV-95373 (F) Updated ERV-94856 (C) Updated 11/11/80 E.K P. 10/8/80 ERV-92678 (D) Updated J . R.'S . ERV-89075 (C) Updated 2/25/80 E.P. 5/S/79 R.D.P. ERV 86722 (B) Updated (A) ERV-83338 - Updated - 9/29/78 E. Plaut F w m v.t.ses as ERV-82135 - Issued - 6/28/77 - R.D.P.10/25/77 - R D P
Optr @ r:ON70 ISSUED BY NO.
- d. n ..nk TP-NPn m kO(( Nd{.lc Switch Co. ,, a _a CHANGE LETTER VALVE ENGINEERING DEPT. mO ** G APP
" ^"
URE TEST PROCEDURE: BULLETIN NP8314 DATE ISSUED / aa g i: .. O ( D rs O 7/?4/R0 1 2 TEST MEDIUM: These valves frequently contain Ethylene Propylene Elastomers.... Test on oil free, filtered air only. GENERAL: 1. Check general construction and appearance of the valve.
- 2. Check nameplate data for conformance to the shop order specifications.
T"~ ~ F X URES TH-332-11712 nest in fixture TH-332-12196 nest in fixture AT-8314-F1 TEST VOLTAGE 1. Test all D.C. valves with test current listed under specified voltage AND CURRENT: on Data Sheet #26.
- 2. Test all A.C. valves with test voltage as listed on test procecure TP-1-003.
COIL TESTS: 1. A.C. - Energize solenoid and check millianaere reading. Value should agree with that shown en Data Sheet No. 24
- 2. D.C. - Energize solenoid and check voltate reading. Value should agree with that indicated per Note 2 on Data Sheet No. 26.
- 3. Dielectric test - Test voltage to be twice the rated voltage plus
( - 1000 volts A.C. for a period of one (1) minute in accordance with TP-1-002 (Test Method #1). Any evidence of damage. arcing, breakdown or current leakage in excess of 0.5 milliampere (Test light sensitiv*ty setting) is cause for rejection. EXTERNAL Apply seamtest solution to all joints and pressurize valveTP-1-009). to 375 PSI. LEAKAGE: Any bubbling or foaming is reason for rejection. ( Re f: Normally closed valves should be checked with solenoid energized. Normally open valves should be checked with solenoid de-energized. NOTE: To avoid seat leakage or noise caused by the possible presence of dirt or loose chips, blow air at maximum operating pressure thru the valve before proceeding with tests below. SEAT LEAKAGE: Check valves for leakage at maximum operating pressure and at 1/4 psi as follows : MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE @ SOLEHOID "2" PORT "3" FCRT TYPE CONSTRUCTION Energized - 1 SCTH Normally Closed - De-energized (Pressure at "2" Port)
~
Energized 1 SCFH - Normally Open * - De-energized (Pressure at "3" Fort) , Check valve for both normally closed (- Universal "2" or "3" Fort) and normally open leakage, as above. l (Pressure at
- Desilient Seats ...... O cc/ min.
Metal Seats.......... 90 cc/ min. F orm V.E.186 RS
ora O comS ISSUED By NO. Autumutit Switch Co. .< o ,. c .r. genu Te-nPe314 VALVE ENGINEERING DEPT. c ,. a ,s APP. 8,w ,- CHAR 4GE LETTER TITLE Av S AR C ML - TEST PROCEDUFE: BULLETIN NP8314 44 g f,; ; e DATEiSSUED / } PAGE 2 OF 2 O es O 7/24/B0 NOISE TEST: During the operational tests, check valve for nr., lac. Any chattering or rattling in excess of normal A.C. hum is reason for rejection. Valve should be tested at test voltage first, but voltage may be increased to , full line voltage if necessary to pass the NOISE TEST ONLY. (Ref: TP-1-015) . OPERATIONAL 1. Operate valve at least 10 times at maximum operating pressure. TESTS:
- 2. Operate valve from maximum operating pressure down to minimum operating pressure.
NOTES: Universal constructions are to be tested for both normally open and nonnally closed operation. PREPARATION Seal all pipe connections with plastic thread protectors and hank coil TOR SHIPMENT: leads or wrap leads around bonnet. Attach tag FV-206-825-1 to all suffix
'E' valves.
CORRECTIVE . M1 tain test log (Form 1109) on all. production runs. ACTION RECORD I l i J l l l
- 1 ERV-99334 (-) Initial Innua 7/24/80 J.R.S.
p .a ... v . in .n
. .. nio O wG t NO.
d ul0lllul.lC h W il d.t L O. ,, e ma ISSUEbBYwoll k- TP-NPR316 VALVE ENGINEERING DEPT. m O ^ G. AP, sv// - CHANGF LETTER TITLE av G 'a n G ' e j i8 d, g C TEST PROCEDURE: BULLETIN NP8316 ^^ 3 U ( DA E S] D , PAGE 1 OF 2 TEST MEDIUM: These valves frequently contain Ethylene Prepylene Elastomers... Test on oil free, filtered iir only. GENERAL: 1. Check valves general appearance and construction.
- 2. Check nameplate data for conformance to shop order specifications.
TEST FIXTURE: TH-48-4307. TEST 1. All D.C. valves are to be tested using the proper test current VOLTAGTS AND listed under specified voltage on Data Shoct #26. CURRENTS 2. All A.C. valves are to be tested using the proper test voltage listed on Test Procedure TP-1-003. COIL TEST 1. A.C. - Energize solenoid and check milliampere reading. Reading should agree with the value given on Data Sheet #24.
- 2. D.C. - Energize solenoid and check voltage reading. Reading should agree with value from Note 2 on Data Sheet # 26.
- 3. Dielectric test - Test voltage to be twice the rated voltage plus 1000 volts A.C. for a period of one (1) minute in accordance with
- TP-1-002 (Test method fi). Any evidence of dam?ge, arcing, breakdown or current leakage in excess of 0.5 milliampere (Test light sensi-tivity setting) is cause for rejection.
OPERATIONAL 1. Check all valves at least five (5) times dry at full line voltage (- TESTS tor proper solenoid operation and noise level as follows:
- a. A metallic " click" of the core striking the plugnut should be heard when the solenoid is energized. No " click" indicates a power failure or sticker.
- b. Chattering, rattling, or A.C. hum in excess of laboratory standards is reason for rejection. (Ref: Test Procedure TP-1-015)
- 2. Operate valve at least ten (10) times at maximum operating pressure.
- 3. Operate valve from maximum operating pressure down to minimum operating pressure.
SEAT LEAKAGE: Check seat leakage with valve energized and de-energized at maximum and minimum operating differential pressure. Seats must be bubbletight. Any leakage is cause for rejection. EXTERNAL Apply seamtest s'olution to all joints and fittings and pressurize valve LE A KAGE: to 1-1/2 times maximum operating pressure. Check valve both energized and de-energized (do not operate valve above maximum operating pressure). Diaphragm wicking, indicated by slight fooming at the exposed diaphragm edge is acceptable. Any other bubbling or foaming is cause for rejection. PPTFAPATION Fors sitIPM1;NT: Car valve prescura, cylinder, and exhaust ports with plantic coated paper plugs.and wrap coil leads together. Attach tag TV-206-825-1 to all C-- suffix 'E' valves. Form V.E.186 MS
osa E comG ISSUED SY NO. _. le d[IlGillUl. Swite.h Co__. , e .a n. c.~e u Tr-nP-n3u. VALVE ENGINEERING DEPT. _ _ _ wO a G. APP.BY CHANGE LETTER TITLE . Av El an D H. rowell C TEST PROCEDURE: BULLETIN NP8316 ,, g g,, g DATE ISSUED I 6/21/77 PAGE 2 OF 7 O rs O l CORRECTIVE . ACTICN Maintain test log (FORM 1109) on all production runs. RECORD: l l
)
ERV-94857 (C) Upd.ited 1G/8/A0 J.R.S. ERV-92216 (B) Ur< lated 1/0/90 J.R.S. ERV-86722 (A) Upd.1ted 9/29/78 E. Plaut ERV R?i35 -I.itized - 6/?8/77 - R.D.P. Pe<= v.s. see ne 1
btw G conTQ ISSUED By N D. AIIl0flRll.lC Sw__, itch Co. ca m o d. Shen
- Te-"r8317 VALVE ENGINEEFlNG DEPT. cw O A S. APP. BY// CH ANGE I.ETTER TITLE W @ AR U "'
TEST PROCEDURE: BULLETIN NP8317 ,, llg .; : a D ATE' ISSUED -/ GE 0F O Ps 9 7M4/80 1 2 TEST MEDIUM: These valves fre<3uen tly confain Ethyler.o Propyleite Elastomers.. . . Test on oil free, filtered air only.n ' - GENERAL: 1. Check general construction and appeararce of valve. Qheck nameplate data for conformance to shop order specifications.
~
2.
,c TEST TJ-320-6990 --
FIXTUEES: TH-320-6844 , , TEST VOLTACE
. . . va s sted ushg de test cment Msted uMer AND CURFINT:
the specified voltage on Data Sheet No. 26.
- 2. All A.C. valves are to be tested using the test voltage" listed on Test Procedure TP-1-003. -
COIL TESTS: 1. A.C. - Energize solenoid and check milliampere reading. Value should agree with that shown on Data Sheet No. 24
- 2. D.C. - Energize solenoid and check voltoae r,eading. Valu% nhould agree with that indicated per Note 2 on kata Chect No.' 26.
- 3. Dielectric test - Test voltage to be twice the l'ated voltaste 'plus 1000 volts A.C. for r period of one (1) minuqin acc.ordance with
( TP-1-002 (Test Method #1). Any eviden6e ci damage, arcing. brhakdown or current leakage Tn, excess of 0.5 milliampere (Test. light sensi- ^ _ tivity setting),.is ,qause'for rejection. - EXTERNAL Apply-seam!cGt solutior,to all joints and pressurize valve'to 375 PSI. . LEAKAGE: Any Dubbling or foaming 15 reason for' rejection. (F.ef:"TP-1?009). Normally clcssd valves' shuald be checked wit [shienMd energized. Normally open valves should be checked with solenoin' de.-ene!'gized. -
, Do_ not operate valve abovq , - .
maximum operating pressure. s
~
NOTE: To avoid seat leakage or. noise caused by the possible presence of dirt or loose chips, blow air at maximum operating pressure thru the valve before procyeding with te::ts below. - SEAT - , Check valves for leakage at flaximum operating pressure and at minimM LEAKAGE: ~ operating pressure as follows: . i MAXIMUM Ali.0'efhBI.ETOKf;GE O
- TNECONSTRUCi10N COLEN0ID I'2" PORT "3" P0id " u_" PORT Normally Closed ,
Enerrized - 1 SCTW , O cc/ min O cc/dliis. ( Pec35ut e at "3". Port ) De-enereized - . - Norrrelly 0;,en n.nergized r 1 SCTH -
"3" Port) ~ De-onorcized d cc/ min. -
f_9 cc/mir JPre:".sure at Univerm l- - Check valve for both normally closed iPressure at "?" or ' 3'_'_ Por t; and normally open leakace. (s_above N
~
r.n.. v e n. m _
om 2 cowG ISSUED BY N O. k61{ I}ntit Sw..itch Co. m is .e a. ::nenx Te-Ne831T VALVE ENGINEERING DEPT. cw O 4 S_ APP.BYj j CHANGE LETTER TITLE Av E AR C ! [N - _! TEST PROCEDURE: BULLETIN NP8317 44 g y; O DATE is'5UED PAGE OF ) O es O 7/24/e0 2 2 NOISE TEST: During the operational tests, check valve for noise. Any chattering or rattling in excess of normal A.C. hum is reason for rejection. Valve should te tested at test voltage first, but voltage may be increased to full line voltage if necessary to pass the NOISE TEST ONLY. (Ref: TP-1-015) OPERATIONAL 1. Operate valve at least 10 times at maximum operating pressure. TESTS: 2. Operate valve from maximum operating pressure down to minimum operating pressure. - NOTES: Universal constructions are to be tested for both normally open and normally closed operations. PREPARATION Seal all pipe connections with plastic thread protectors and hank coil FOR Sri 1PflENT: leads or wrap leads around bonnet. Attach tag TV-206-825-1 to all suffix
'E' valves.
CORRECTIVE M intain test log (Form 1109) on all production runs. ACTION RECORD:
}
)
ERV-% 3'm (-) Ini ti.11 Is:me 7/24/90 J.R.S.
_ . . . of a C r:oNt d ISSUED By N D. dYllOmuh.. C SwTch Co. a .m 2. ~._. m ,. .w - VALVE ENGINEERING DEPT. c O ka O APP. BY CHANGE LETTER AR U b* PONO1l E (. T6TLE TEST PFOCEDUKE: BU' LETIN NP83"O
,$ v C 44 G , La O D ATE ISSUED I
D es O 6/21/77 PAGE 3 OF ; TElT MEDIUM: These valves frequently contain Ethylene Propylene Eldwwrs. . . Test en oil free, filtered air only. GENERAL: 1. Check general construction and appearance.cf valve.
- 2. Check nameplate data for conformance to shop order specifications.
TE27 F:XTUFIS :Tunctional and Seat Leakage Tests: 1/8 NPT: Adapter TT-332-7301 w/ attachment GT-332-6900-4 1/4 NPT: Adapter TP-332-7301 w/ attachment GT-32-6900-3 External Leakage Tests: 1/3 NPT: AT- 8320- A-1 1/8 NPT: AT-8320-B-1 TEST VOLTAGE 1. All D.C. valves are to be tested using the test current listed under g CUP.? INT: the specified voltage on Data Sheet No. 26.
- 2. All A.C. valves are to be tested using the test voltage listed on Test Porcedure TP-1-003.
(. COIL TESTS: 1. A.C. - Energi e solenoid and check milliampere reading. Value should agree with that shown on Data Sheet No. 24.
- 2. D.C. - Energize solenoid and check volt 1ge reading. Value should agree with that indicated per Note 2 on Data Sheet No. 26.
- 3. Dielectric Test - Test voltage to be twice the rated voltage plus 1000 volts A.C. for a period of one (1) minute in accordance with TP-1-002 (Test method #1). Any evidence of damage, arcing, breakdown or current leakage in excess of 0.5 milliampere (Test light sensi-tivity setting) is cause for rejection. .
EXTEPJIAL LEAF. AGE: Apply seamtest solutien to all joints and pressurize valve to 375 psi. Any bubbling or fcaming is reason for rejection. Mass spectrometer testing at 375 psi is an acceptable alternative test method.(Ref: TF-1-009 . NOTE: To avoid seat leakge or noise caused by the possible presance of dirt or loose chips, blow air at maximum operating pressure thru the valve before proceeding with tests below. SEAT LEAKAGE With cylinder pcrt closed off, check valve for seat leakage at maximum (hlGH operating pressure. Valves must be bubbletight. FEESSURE) a. Normally Closed Construction: Apply pressure at Port #2, check leaksgo at Port #3, energized and de-energized. / b. Normally Open Construction: Apply pressure at Port #3, check \ leakage at Port #2, energized and de-energized. F orm V.E.184 MS
e M 1977 nra M cevE ISSUED BY N O. ADIUlllutic Switch Co. ,. . .. s R. P-c 1 2-NPs m VALVE ENGINEERING DEPT. ,. O u S. APP. CHANGF LETTER TITLE r. v 5 am 3 - E 44 g 1; Q DATE ISSUED PAGE TEST PROCEDURE: BULLETIN NP8320 O mO 6/21/77 2 '2 NOISE TEST: During the operational tests, check valve for noise. Any chattering or rattling in excess of normal A.C. hum is reason for rejection. Valve should be tested at test voltage first but voltage may be increased to full line voltage if necessary to pass the NOISE TEST ONLY. (Ref. TP-1-015) OPERATIONAL 1. Operate . valve at least 10 times at maximum operating pressure. TESTS: 2. Operate valve from maximum operating pressure down to minimum operating pressure. NOTES: Universal constructions are to be tested for both normally open and normally closed operation. I SEAT LEAKAGE ( LOW PRESSURE) With cylinder port closed off, check seat leakage at 1/4 psi. Valves must be bubbletight.
- a. & b. Same as High Pressure.
PREPARATION TCE SHIPMENT: Seal all pipe connections with plastic coated paper plugs or plastic thread protectors and hank coil leads or wrap leads around bonnet. Attach tag TV-206-825-1 to all suffix 'E' valves. CCRRECTIVE ACTION Maintain test log (Form 1109) on all production runs. RECORD: i ERV-99052 (E) Retyped Pg. 1 and Updated 10/22/81 JRS ERV-94858 (D) Updated 10/8/80 J.R.S. ERV-93529 (C) Updated 5/9/80 R.D.P. ERV 85722 (B) Updated 9/29/78 E. Plaut ! ERV-86033 (A) Updated, Page 1 Retyped 7/18/78 JRS
- EEV-82135 - Issued - 6/28/77 - R.D.P.
, Form VM. ios as 4 I l
nio fa , .ma d lllOlll(Il,C l h WI.IC!) ( A
.. tg u. e eam" '"""
no. TP-" N 21 VALVE ENGINEElllNG DEPT. , t] 4 a Acc. . - CHANGE LETTER TITLE w a ^n U U TEST PROCEDURE: BULLETIN llP8321 aa O jA, ED PAGE
; y OF 7 TEST MEDIUM: Tnese valves frequently contain Ethylene Propylene Elastomers... Tost on ,
oil free, filtered air only. J GE!1ERAL: 1. Check valves general appearance and construction. l
- 2. Check tiameplate data for conformance to shop order pecifications. I TEST AT S2-623-Al (Normally Clo':ed)
FIXTURES: AT 0321-B1 (Normally open) TEST 1. All D.C. valves are to be tested using the test current listed VOLTAGES AND on Data Sheet #26. CURRENTS: 2. All A.C. valves are to be tested using the test voltage listed on Test Procedure TP-1-003. COIL TEST: 1. A.C. - Energize solenoid and check milliampere reading. Reading should agree with the value given on Data Sheet #24.
- 2. D.C. - Energize solenoid and check voltage reading. Reading should agree with value per Note 2 on Data Sheet #26.
- 3. Diclectric test - Test voltage to be twice the rat <:d voltage plus 1000 volts A.C. for a period of one (1) minute in accordance with TP-1-002 (Test method ill). Any evidence of damage, arcing, breakdown
( or current leskage in excess of 0.5 mil 11 ampere (test light sensi-tivity setting) is cause fer rejection. OPERATIONAL 1. Check all valves at least five (5) times dry at full line voltage TESTS: for proper solenoid oocretion and noise icvel as follows:
- a. A metallic " click" of the core striking the plugnut should be heard when the solenoid is energized. No " click" indicates a
, power failure or sticker.
- b. Chattering, rattling or A.C. hum in excess of laboratory standards is reason for rejection. (Ref: Test Procedure TP-1-015)
- 2. Operate valve at least ten (10) times at maximum operating pressure.
- 3. Operate valve from maxinum operating pressure down to minimum operating pressure.
SEAT LEAKAGE: Check seat leakage with valve energized and de-energi'.ed at maximum and minimum operating pressure. Allowable 1cakage: 90 cc/ min. EXTERNAL Apply seamtest to all joints and fittings and pressurize valve to LEAK. IGE : 300 psig. Check valve both energized and de-energized (do not operate valve above maximum operating pressure ). Any bubbling or foaming is cause for rejection. (!'ef. : TP-1-009) PhEPARATION Can valve pressure, cylinder and exhaust ports with plastic coated I'Oh bilIPMCST : paper plugs or plastic thread pretceters, and wrap coil leads together. Attach tag FV-206-825-1 to all cuffix 'F_' valves, e... vt tes n
* . HEW S i tin'O ISStJCD By NO.
AlllOlllull'(, Sh,I (,h L*O,
P'.w. u Tr>m. m
,, m .a VALVE ENGINEERING DEPT. ,.a O ,a G. Are r...a+4rit Lervtre TITLE 3y 3 an a g h g/ '
l , TEST PROCEDURE: BULLETItiNP8321 44 0 v. O DA rt istuto 6/'1/77 PAGE 7 gy 7 Di % O CORRECTIVE ACTION Maintain test log Torm (1109) on all production runa. ' RECORD:
)
I 8 ERV-94859 (C) Updit.rd 10/0/80 J.R.S. ERV-93529 (B) Upd.1 te d 5/8/SO R.D.P. ERV '96722 (A) tipdated 9/29/78 E. Plelut ERV-S2135 - Issued - 6/2S/77 - R.D.P. Perm v.s. iso as
= . _ _ . . . . ._ . . .
.. brw Q t wD issuto By No.
A lllOlll(Il.. lC b. Wi.ll!1 (.O. y a ,a k. I'nw 11 rr-Nvam VALVE ENGINEERING DEPT. ,a C1 a G. Arr>. / CHANCE LETTER TiftE av DI ^n G ' # II ( TLST PROCEDURE: 13t!Lt.ETIN HPO:':1 (REDUNDA!!T SOLI:NOI!D uG O M D DATEessuED
s a h/?]/77 PAGE 1 OF 7 TEST MEDIUM: These valvas frequently contain Ethylene Propylene elastomers. .. Test on oil tree, fittered air only. (
GENERAL: 1. Check the valve for general construction and appearance. i
?. Check nameplate data for conformance to shop order specifications.
TEST TIXTURE: AT-8323-Al or piped direct to air line. TEST VOLTAGE AND CURRENT: 1. All D.C. solenoids are to be tested using the test current listed under the specified voltage on Data Sheet No. 26.
- 2. All A.C. solenoids are to be tested using the test voltage listed on Test Procedure TP-1-003.
COIL TEST: 1. A.C. - Energize each solenoid separately and check the milliampere ! reading. Reading should agree with value per Data Sheet No. 24
- 2. D.C. - Energize each solenoid separately and check the voltage reading. Reading should agree with value from Note 2 on Data Sheet No. 26.
- 3. Dielectric test - Test voltage to be twice the rated voltage plus 1000 volts A.C. for a period of one (1) minute in accordance with TP-1-002 (Test method #1). Any evidence of damage, arcing, breakdown or current leakage in excess of 0.5 milliampere (Test light sensi-(. OPERATIONAL tivity setting) is cause for rejection.
TESTS: 1. Operate each solenoid at least five times dry at full line voltage and check for proper scienoid operation and noise level as follows: (a) A metallic " click" of the core striking the plugnut should be heard when the solenoid is energized. No " click" indicates a power failure or sticker. (b) Any chattering, rattling, or A.C. humming in excess of Laboratory Standards, is reason for rejection. (Ref.: TP-1-005) For normally closed catalog items apply pressure at "2" and for 2. normally open catalog items apply pressure at #3. Ia) 7. era':e valve at leest ".n thes at 4xi-:- :.er.atin; pressure usir.g Scler.eid =A; repeat using Soleneid G . (b) 2perate valve frc, maximus to miniruno operating pressure using Solanoid GA; repeat usin , Solenoid s.. SEAT LEAKAGE: With cylinder port (1) closed check for leakage at 1/4 psi and at maximum operatinr, prersure differential as below:
"2" and check (a) For nornalJy cloud cone.truction apply prencure at only enerc.ized, "A"
for Jeakarn at ":l" de-enero.ir.d. with Solenoid and with Solenuid "ll" only enerr.ized. Valve: must fut bubbletight. (b) For normally open construction apply prensure at "3" and check for leakage at "2" de-energized, with Sc]envid "A" only enerr,iacd, and with Solenoid "!!" only enerr, iced. Valves munt be bubblotir.ht. Poem v.s.tes as
. ' n ts G i
i ave 195ULO liv NO. d lll O lll(ll.lC b.ul.l f. h l.O. ,, a ... c P " 1I VALVE ENGINEERING DEPT. w nra m
.. O .a G AP CHAf4GE LETTER TEST PROCEDURE: BULLETIN llP8'123 y g (PEDut!DAllT GOLEMOID) y, ty Outessolo I O es 0, u 2 OF 2 EXTERNAL LEAKAGE: With solenoid energized or de-energi::ed as required, pressurize interior of valve to %0 p;Ir., app 1V ccam test to all joints and fittings. Any bubblin'g or foaming is cause for rejection. (Ref. TP-1-009)
PREPARATI0tl FOR SHIPMENT: Cap "1", "2", and "3" porta of valve with plastic coated plug:: or plastic thread connectors and hank coil leads. Attach tag TV-206-325-1.to all suffix 'E' valves. FLOW DIAGRAMS CATA. NOS. NORMALLY CLOSED SOL. A f. B EITHER OR BOTH yp gpjgp DE-ENERGIZED SOLS. ENERGIZED SOL. A SOL. A NP8323A19 NPB323A20 21 22 23 24 2 2 35 36 1 1 37 38 3 3 39 40 SOL. B SOL. B NOR" ALLY OFEN
-$NERbIED SO ENbRbbD SOL. A SOL. A 31 32 43 44 2 2 45 46 47 48 3 3 SOL. B SOL. B CORRECTIVE ACTION Maintain test log (Form 1109) on all production runs.
RECORD: ERV .95067 (E) t'pd.1 red 10/10/60 .I.R.S. ERV-94675 ( D) U; d.ited 9/5/80 E.P. ; ERV-93529 (C) Upd.ited S/9/b0 R.D.P. ERV-86722 (II) U; cht eil 9/20/78 E. Flaut ERV-83712 - Pcviued - 12/5/77 - R.D.P. EFV-02135 - Innu.'d - G/20/77 - R.D.P.
**em v.t. ies as
i t
. _ - ~ . . . . . . . .
otw @,r ONt6 tWJto BY NO. I* 13,w,1 i TP-NPUuu
- k. Vi .l(.l}
. (... ,(), O w D kill ()))](ll.] ('. u CHANGE LEffER VALVE ENGINEERING DEPT. 3,g) .. e ann ,
Av 3 An C
# C l flTLE 44 O in Q D ATE 155UED 0' 1 2 C3 es O f>/21/77 TEST PROCEDURE: BULLETIN NP8344 These valves frequently contain Ethylene Propylene Elastomers. . . Test on TEST MEDIU:1:
oil free, filtered air only.
- 1. Check general construction and appearance of valve.
GENERAI,: Check n.2meplato data for conformance to nhop order specifications. 2. TEST FIXTURCE TJ-546-0023 TJ-764-8949 TA-793-9149 TEST VOLTAGE IIsted
- 1. All D.C. valves are to be tested using the test current AND CURRENT: under the specified voltage on Data Shoot No. 26.
- 2. All A.C. valves are to be tested using the test voltage on Test Procedure TP-1-003.
Value COIL TESTS: 1. A.C. - Energize solenoid and check mil 11 ampere reading. should agree with that shown on Data Sheet No. 24. Value should
- 2. D.C. - Energize solenoid and check voltage reading.
indicated per Note 2 on Data Sheet No. 26. agree with that - Test voltage to be twice the rated voltage plus
- 3. Dielectric Test 1000 volts A.C. for a pericd of one (1) minute in accordance with Any evidence of damage, arcing, breakdown
[ TP-1-002 (Test method #1).
' or current leakage in excess of 0.5 milliampere (Test light sensi-tivity setting) is cause for rejection.
LEAKAGE _: Apply seamtest solution to all operate joints and valvepressurice above maximum valve to 450 psig, energized and de-energized (do notAny bubbling or foaming is cause for rejection operating pressure). (Ref.: TP-1-009) leakage or noise caused by the possible presence of dirt NOTE: To avoid seat i or loose chips, blow air at 10% over maximum operating pressure rat ng thru the valve before proceeding with tests below. 10% over maximum operating pressure. SEAT LEAKAGE : Check valve for seat leakage at (HIGH Allowable leakage: Air: 6 SCFH PRESSURC) During the Operational Tests, check valve for noise. Ar.y chattering NOISE TEST: or rattling in excess of normal A.C. hum is reason for rejection. tent voltage first, but voltage may be Valve should be tested at increased to full line voltage if necessary to pass the NOISE TEST ON LY. (Ref. TP-1-015) OPERATIONAL TLSTS: Single Solenoid Valves: least ten (10) times at maximum operating Operate valve at pressure and from m,ximu5 operatinn pressure down to ('. minimum operatinn pressure, alternately openinc t>y it..k cylinder check that connections ..ifter opr.r.itinn to m.1ke nure proper shiftinn h.u occurred. i l l F orm v1 innpg M
'on S 'n.nS
, i r;:.ino ey NO.
A lll O m u l.lC h.Wi.l(.ll
. L.O. ,, e ,, a r. . ~. . o 7p .m y,,,
VALVE ENGINEETs!NG DEPT. ,a 0
- R Arv *p 7 CHANGE LETTER TifLE av M an Q /f ( C j TUST Ph0CEDUPE - BULLETIN !;P3M 44 G v. O DATE 135UED }
O rs C 6/21/77 PAGE 2 0F 2 OPERATI0llAL fi!STS: Dual Solenoid Valves:
- 1. Test as ror sinr,le r.nlenoid valves, energizing and de-energizing :,olenoids alternately.
- 2. Alternately er.ergize and de-energize solenoids in normal pressure range ending up with solenoid A (Sol #2-) last energized. Then increase inlet pressure at least 15 pri or more. If lock-up bleed is not present, valve will leak heavily out of exnaust. This is a defective rejectable valve.
- 3. Solenoids must be energized at least 0.3 seconds on air service.
SEAT LEAKAGE: (LOW PRESSURE ) Check seat leakage at 20 psi. Allowable Leakage: Air: 6 SCTH PREPA MTION FOR SHIPMENT: Seal all pipe cennection with plastic coated paper plugs er plastic ) thrcad protectors and hank coil leads. Attach tag T'!-206-825-1 to all suffix 'E' valves. CORRECTIVE ACTION Maintain test log (Form 1109) on all production runs. RECORD:
. h j
I:RV-%0r35 (N t ipd.i t .nl lo/H/00 J . R. S . ERV 03524 (B) tip.la t. l t b/9/30 R.D.P. [F.V-86722 ( A) linda ted '#/ 29 / 7 t1 1: . Plaut ERV-R2135 - Isnu"d - 6/;'t1/77 - R.D.P.
- a ~ v.t. tes ns
l Atilomatic Switch Co. eEer = = ; - g. . F LO AH AM PAAK.NEW JERSEY 07932 N J -201' 9e6 2000 N Y
- 212 3M 3765 l
l l AQR-67368 APPENDIX 8 ACTIVATION ENERGY VALUES FOR ASCO CATALOG NP-1 VALVE COMPONENTS l I ( (. O
FOREWORD (' This Appendix is a compendium of information which has been gathered to determine ASCO Catalog NP-1 valve nonmetallic material activa-tion energy values for use in Arrhenius calculations made to determine accelerated aging parameters to be used for thermal aging simulation included in ASCO Cat'alog NP-1 valve qualification test programs. The information contained in this Appendix has been obt ained from documents within public domain as well as the follow-ing two reports which were prepared for ASCO: (l) Franklin Research Center Report (FRC Project C4901)
" ACCELERATED THERMAL AGING 0F EPDM AND VITON A" by S.P.Carfagno and L.G.Haskins, August 1979.
(2) Westinghouse Electric Corp. R&D Memo No. 80-787-STNES-M1 " THERMAL AGING--ASCO VALVES-- NONMETALLIC COMPONENTS" by R.R.Dixon, July 31, 1980. The above listed reports are not included in their entirety in this Appendix since they contain some information which is considered by I ASCO to be of a proprietory nature and, in addition, since Report 2
- is classified by Westinghouse Electric Corp. as proprietory.
Copies of these reports are not av a'i l a b l e for distribution. However, consideration will be given to customer requests for j their perusal at Automatic Switch Company, Florham Park, NJ (for Report 1) or Westinghouse R&D Center, Pittsburgh, PA (for Report l 2). Specific identification of ASCO Catalog NP-1 valve component i material vendors and material compounds which are considered 1 ( proprietory by ASCO are also not included herein. l l l i
CONTENTS SECTION PAGE )
- 1. Introduction..................................... .. 81
- 2. Equipment Description................................B1
- 3. Cr it ic al Component s Descr ipt ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .B2
- 4. Activation Energy Values for Critical ASCO Catalog NP-1 Valve Components....................... 82 4.1. Elastomeric Critical Components............... 82 4.1.1. Ethylene Propylene Terpolymer (EPDM) E1astomers..................... 83 4.1.2. Viton Fluorocarbon Elastomers........ 84 4.1.3. Nomex Fabric.......................... 84 4.2. Solenoid Coil Materials....................... 85 4.2.1. Magnet Wire Enamels................... 86 4.2.2. Glass Cloth Tape...................... 86 4.2.3. . Silicone Varnish.......................B6 4.2.4. Nomex Paper........................... 86 4.2.5. Silicone Rubber....................... 87 4.2.6. Iso-Mica with Hi-Temperature Epoxy.....B7 4.2.7. Silicone Impregnated Mica Paper........B7
- 5. Summary............................................. 87 APPENDIX El References Used for Determination of' Activation Energy Values BII Identification of Critical Valve Components.
i
-B1-ACTIVATION ENERGY
( VALUETTOR ASCO CATALOG NP-1 VALVE COMPONENTS
- 1. INTRODUCTION:
Qualification testing of ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves in accordance with ASCO Qualification Specification AQS-21680/Rev. C requires accelerated thermal aging which is intended to artificially simul ate the thermal aging of Catalog NP-1 valve materials which would take place during a valve's installed life. The accelerated thermal aging parameters to be used are determined by an Arrhenius calculation which is recognized as an acceptable method of relating accelerated thermal aging parameters to the thermal aging of materials which takes place in actual service. In order to provide meaningfu'l results from Arrhenius c al cul at ions , it is necessary to determine, for each type of ( organic material, activation energy values which reflect the rates at which the thermal degradation reactions .o c c u r . Metals and other nonorganic materials need not be considered since they are not subject to degradation due to the thermal environments associated with actual service. Activation energy values for the organic materials contained in critical j ASCO Catalog NP-1 valve components, which reflect the thermal l degradation reaction rate for these materials as used in ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves, have been determined. The activation energy values determined and the sources used for their determination are outlined herein.
- 2. EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION:
All valves included in the eight generic families as outlined
- 2. EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION: -continued-
)
in Section 3 of the main report have been considered in this activation energy value determination.
- 3. CRITICAL COMPONENTS DESCRIPTION:
Those ASCO Catalog NP-1 valve components which both contain organic materials subject to potential degradation from environ-mental irfluences associated with typical nuclear power plant applications and are essential to the performance of the safety related f unctions typically required in such applications have been designated as critical components. Tables 1 thru 8 (Ap-pendix BII) identify the critical components included within each of the eight generic valve families being considered in this qualification program.
- 4. ACTIVATION ENERGY VALUES FOR CRITICAL ASCO CATALOG NP-1 VALVE COMPONENTS:
4.1. Elastomeric Critical Components: ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves are available wi th two types of elastomer materials; ethylene propylene terpolymer (EPDM) and Viton (DuPont TM). For the purpose of determining activation energy values, either of these elastomer mate-rials may be considered av ail ab le in ASCO Catalog NP-1 i valves in two basic forms; as molded parts or as rein-forced sheet stock. Molded elastomeric critical components contain no other organic materials whereas reinforced sheet Stock critical elastomeric components (used as I diaphragms in Bulletin NP8316 valves only) are constructed by moldin;; the elastomeric material on an organic reinforcement
( 4. ACTIVATION ENERGY VALUES FOR CRITICAL ASCO CATALOG NP-1 VALVE COMPONENTS: 4.1. Elastomeric Critical Components: -continued-fabric. Since molded critical elastomeric components contain no other organic materials, the activation energy value determined for the elastomer may be directly applied as the activation energy for these components. However, since reinforced sheet stock critical elasto-4 meric components contain a second organic material, the activation energy of both the elastomer and the reinforce-ment material will be considered and the lower of the two values will be applied as the activation energy value to be used for Arrhenius calculations involving these ( components. 4.1.1. Ethylene Propylene Terpolymer (EPDM) Elastomers: Reference No. 1 Report indicates that an activation energy of 1.34 eV(3) was determined for EPDM
~
based on the product of retention of 500 psi tensile strength and retention of 100% elongation. Reference No. 2 Report indicates that an activation energy of 0.94 eV(4) was determined for EPDM based on the retention of 500% elongation. In addition, an activation energy of 1.1 eV(5) was determined for EPDM based on the retention of 200% elongation. Based on the above information, ASCO has conservatively chosen a value of 0.94 eV as { the activation energy value to be applied to the
. I 4 ACTIVATION ENERGY VALUES FOR CRITICAL ASCO CATALOG NP-1 VALVE COMPONENTS:
)
4.1.1. Ethylene Propylene Terpolymer (EPDM) Elastomers:
-continued-ethylene propylene terpolymer (EPDM) elastomers used in ASCO Catalog NP-1 critical valve components 4.1.2. Viton (DuPont TM) Fluorocarbon Elastomers:
Reference No.1 Report indicates that an activation energy of 1.11 eV(6) was determined for Viton by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Reference No. 2 Report indicates an activation energy for. Viton of 1.04 eV(8) based on the thermal stability and retained sealing capability of the elastomer. In addition, an activation energy of 1.2 eV(7) was determined for Viton baseo on the retention of 50% tensile strength. Based on the above information, ASCO has conser-vatively chosen an activation energy value of 1.04 eV as the value to be applied to Viton l elastomers used in ASCO Catalog NP-1 critical valve components i ! 4.1.3. Nomex (DuPont TM) Fabric: Reference No. 2 Report indicates an activation ! energy of 1.55 eV(10) for Nomex paper based on the retention of 50% of initial tensile strength. In addition, an activation energy of 0.96 eV(9)
- was determined for Nomex fabric based on the
. retention of 50% of initial toughness and a g value of 1.29 eV(9) was determined for Nomex
- 4. ACTIVATION ENERGY VALUES FOR CRITICAL ASCO CATALOG NP-1 VALVE
( COMPONENTS: 4.1.3. Nomex (DuPont TM) Fabric: -continued-fabric based on retention of 50% of initial strength. Based on the above information, ASCO has conservatively chosen a value of 0.96 eV as the activation energy to be applied to the reinforcement fabric contained in Bulletin NP8315 diaphragms which are considered ASCO Catalog NP-1 critical valve components. 4.2. Solenoid Coil Materials: The following non-metallic materials are included in ASCO Catalog NP-1 valve solenoid coils and have been considered in the determination of activation energy values: ( Magnet Wire Enamel Glass Cloth Tape Silicone Varnish Nomex (DuPont TM) Paper Silicone' Rubber Lead' Wire Insulation (inner layer) Glass Braid Lead Wire Insulation (outer layer) Iso-Mica Bonded with Hi-Temperature Epoxy Silicone Resin Impregnated Mica Paper Since ASCO Catalog NP-1 valve solencid coils contain a number of organic mater i al s , the activation energy for each will be considered and the lowest of all values { determined will be applied as the activation energy value to be used for Arrhenius calculations involving solenoid coils.
-B6-
- 4. ACTIVATION ENERGY VALUES FOR CRITICAL ASCO CATALOG NP-1 VALVES COMPONENTS: -continued-
)
1 4.2.1. Magnet Wire Enamels: Two types of magnet wire enamel insulation are j available in ASCO Catalog NP-1 solenoid coils. Reference No. 2 report indicates activation energy vslues of 1.16 ev(15) and 1.77 ev(I4) I for these two enamel materials. In addition, values of 1.32 eV(ll) and 1.85 eV(l) have been determined for these two types of enamels. Based on the above information, ASCO has conserv-atively chosen a yalue of 1.16 eV as the activ a-tion energy applicable to either of the magnet wire enamels contained in ASCO C at alog NP-1 solenoid coils. i 4.2.2. Glass Cloth Tape: Reference No. 2-Report indicates that glass cloth tape would be unaffected by thermal aging. 4.2.3. Silicone Varnish: Reference No. 2 Report indicates an activation energy value of 1.08 eV(15) for the silicone varnish used in ASCO Catalog NP-1 solenoid coils based on 50% retention of initial useful dielectric strength. 4.2.4. Nomex (DuPont TM) Paper: Reference No. 2 Report indicates an activation energy for Nomex Paper of 1.54 eV(10) based on an end-of-lif e criterion of 300 V/ mil . electrical ' strength.
1
- 4. ACTIVATION ENERGY VALUES FOR CRITICAL ASCO CATALOG NP-1 VALVES COMPONENTS:
~
-continued-4.2.5. Silicone Rubber:
l An activation energy of 1.59 eV(16) was determined for the silicone rubber insulation on ASCO Catalog NP-1 valve solenoid coil lead wires. 4.2.6. Iso-Mica with Hi-Temperatur'e Epoxy: An activation energy of 1.00 eV(I7) was determine for this material. 4.2.7. Silicone Impregnated Mica Paper: Reference No. 2 Report indicates a value of 1.08 eV(17) for this material.
- 5.
SUMMARY
Based on the information summarized herein, ASCO has conservati-( vely chosen to apply the following activation energy values in all Arrhenius calculation used in connection with ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves:
. All Ethlyene Propylene Terpolymer (EPDM) Elastomers..... 0.94 eV Viton Elastomers (except Bulletin NP8316 Viton Diaphragms)......................................... 1.04 eV Viton Diaphragms in Bulletin NP8316 V alves. . . . . . . . . . . . 0.96 eV
- All Solenoid C011s.......................................l.00 eV l
/ja
( l .
[ b . DEPENDA L Lnce 1888 N ROL I FLOAHAM PARK,NEWJERSEY 07032 N.J.-(200 966-2000 N.Y.-(22 344 3785 APPENDIX BI REFERENCES USED FOR THE DETERMINATION OF ACTIVATION ENERGY VALUES i
-BI i i
REFERENCES I (I)S.P.Carfagno and L.G.Haskins, " Accelerated Thermal Aging of EPDM and Viton A", prepared for Automatic Switch Company by Franklin Research Center (Project C4901), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, August, 1979. (2)R.R.Dixon, " Thermal Aging- ASCO Valves-Nonmetallic Components", prepared for Automatic Switch Company by Westinghouse R&D Center (R&D Memo No. 80-7B7-STNES-M1), Pittsburgh, Pennsy-vania, July, 1980. (3)R.S.Auda and 0.R.Hazelton, " Ethylene Propylene Elastomer Technology for Improved High Temperature Serviceability", presented at Automobile Engineering Meeting, Society of Automotive Engineers, Detroit, Michigan, October, 1975. (4)G.M. Bower, " Determination of Life at Various Temperatures of Nylon 6/6, EPDM Rubber, and Paper-Epoxy Laminates", R&D Report 78-187-COSTR-R1, April 6, 1979. (5)DuPont Manufacturing Information on DX-0001 and "Nordel". (6) Martin Marietta Corporation, "Long Life Assurance Study for Manned Spacecraft Long Life Hardware." Vol. IV, Report No. N73-23856, Denver, Colorado, September, 1972. ( (7) Publication No. 14 "Viton", E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co., July, 1965. (8)Information Bulletin IBR-75-14, Buffalo Weaving and Belting Co., 260 Chandler Street, Buffalo, New York. (9) Bulletin N-236, " Properties of Nomex Aramid Fiber", E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co., October, 1969. (10) Bulletin N-255, " Properties of Nomex Type 410 Nylon Paper", E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co., September, 1971. (ll) Bulletin No. 19 (Rev. 4), " Pyre-M.L. Wire Enamel", E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co., September, 1972, and Arrhenius Curves provided by DuPont. (I2)Bu11etin B, "Thermatex 200 Product and Application Data", Essex International. (13)E.J.Croop, " Review of AI-8 Aromatic Polymer Wire Enamel and Comparisons with DuPont ML Enamel", Westinghouse Materials Research Labs Report 62132-32411-1 (Restricted), January, 1962.
-BI )
REFERENCES:
-continued-(14)Essex International, R&D curves, undated.
(15)Dow Corning Corp., Private Communication, December 14, 1977. (16) Bulletin 11, "What They're Saying About Teflon Fluorocarbon Resins", E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. (17)R.T.Conley, " Thermal Stability of Polymers", Vol. I (Dekker, 1970). 1
Au onutlic Suilch CU. .E r,:::::r=: Rx Sece 1888 B1WE (- FLORHAM PARK NEW JERSEY 07932 N.Jr(200 966 2000 N.Y-(212) 344 3765 l APPENDIX BII j IDENTIFICATION OF CRITICAL VALVE COMPONENTS BULLETIN NUMBER GENERIC FAMILY PAGE 206-380 VDSS 3.1 BII-1 206-381 VDSS 3.1 BII-l 206-832 VDSS 3.1 BII-1 ( 208-266 VDSS 3.1 BII-l 208-448 VDSS 3.1 BII-l 210-036 VDSS 3.1 BII-l NP8314 VDSS 3.2 BII-2 NP8316 VDSS 3.3 BII-3 NP8317 VDSS 3.* BII-4 NP8320 VDSS 3.5 BII-5 NP8321 VDSS 3.6 - BII-6 NP8323 VDSS 3.7 BII-7 NP8344 VDSS 3.8 BII-8 (D
4~_h T R A P X X . X L X X X I I F I I F - A I F F F F F C I I F F F I U SF UUS X I T F U I U S S S F R S ' ' E X C ' V ' V R I V 'R R R 'R P F E N 'R R ' ' ' R I A H H H H 'K P 0 T H H T IT TI T I I 8
K N T T -
O WW W W W W TU I I 6 C ' S S S S O - H S S E E E E H H 1 C E E V V L VL LV L V T I T IS E 1 I V H L L A A A A VW W V L 0 W A A V V V E V V S S A U S F F F F E E V S E F F R R R R V V S V R R O O O O L L C I L O O A A D 6 6 6 6 V V A 4 1 1 1 L V 4 1
/ / C C L
/ / / /
1 1 3 3 5 5 A A A S E R E B M U N 5 2 3 2 3 2
/\ .
6 V L A S N G N 9 0 3 9 0 3 4 6 2 4 6 2 6 6 8 6 8 X N / I - V I W 8 8 4 4 6 6 A 9 0 0 0 0 Y T A 9 2 2 2 2 L) N R l 1 V V V I6 O D V V V F F F F F F M3 C ' - A0
/
F - H 0 C C1 I2 I H N R W E , T Y N N6 YR S E6 LA S G2 BP
- M A E
18 32 0 EL SA SC M A B U y X
\/
AI N S S , - T S8 BI T T D4 UR R A V4 SC A E
- P S N8 I0 2
S T , N2 E3 N8 O - 3 2 3 2 P6 3 2 - - - - 5 2 M0 T - - 2 2 0 0 5 9 O2 0 0 6 6 2 2 0 1 C LN 5 5 2 2 1 1 0 9 4
, A - - - - - -
L1 C R 1 1
- 4 4 6 6 2 0 8 A8 I E -
0 0 0 0 0 7 0 TP B 2 2 2 C3 M 4 4 2 2 2 2 1 1 V V I - I V V V V V V T6 R U V F F F F F H G G I0 C N F R2 C , F0 O83 N - O6 I 0 T2 A T CN II - FT 4 IE TL L NL T y I y EU A O DB E C I( S
m m r IDENTIFICATION OF C'RITICAL COMPONENTS IN VDSS 3'.2' GENERIC FAMILY VALVES (BULLETIN NP8314) 0 T 0 SUB-ASSEMBLY WHICH CONTAINS NAME DRAWING CRITICAL PART VALVES WHICH CONTAIN CRITICAL PART NUMBER PART NAME DRAWING NUMBER DISC GV-60-452-18 CORE ASSY GV-75-769-1R 3/64 & 3/32 ORF VALVES WITH 'E' SUFFIX GV-75-769-2R p GV-75-769-4R p GV-60-452-9 GV-75-769-1J 3/64 & 3/32 ORF VALVES WITH 'V' SUFFIX GV-75-769-2J p p p GV-75-769-4J o C0ll / HV27-502
/ ALL AC VALVES COIL GV38-793 / /N ALL DC VALVES h
7 7 l ISSUED 11-26-80
IDENTIFICATIONOFCRITICdlCOMPONENTSINVDSS3.3GENER'ICFAMILYVALVES (BULLETINNP8316) SU8-ASSEMBLY WHICH CONTAINS CRITICAL CRITICAL PART N NT VALVES WHICH CONTAIN CRITICAL PART OM T NAME l NUMBER PART NAME DRAWING NUMBER DISC GV60-452-18 CORE ASSY GV60-453-AM (AC) ALL VALVES WITH 'E' SUFFIX y GV65-969-X (DC) U GV60-452-9 GV60-453-J (AC) ALL VAVLES WITH 'V' SUFFIX y y GV65-969-J (DC) U GV200-344-6 . DISC FOLDER ASSY FV-200-848-10 ALL VALVES WITH 'E' SUFFIX y GV200-344-2 y FV200-848-5 ALL VAVLES WITH 'V' SUFFIX DIAPHRAGM GV204-770-11 PRESS.DIAPH.ASSY GV204-869-15 3/8,1/2 & 3/4 NPT VALVES WITH 'E' SUFFIX GV204-770-9 GV204-869-11 y h ! GV204-770-5 GV204-869-5 3/8,1/2 & 3/4 NPT VALVES WITH 'V' SUFFIX 7 GV204-770-11 y FV218-845-1 3/8,1/2 & 3/4 NPT VALVES WITH 'E' SUFFIX Y GV204-770-10 EXH.DIPAH. ASSY GV204-869-12 3/8,1/2 & 3/4 NPT VALVES WITH 'E' SUFFIX GV204-770-6 f GV204-869-6 3/8,1/2 & 3/4 NPT VALVES WITH 'V' SUFFIX GV88-808-12 DIAPH. ASSY GV166-838-21 1" NPT VALVES WITH 'E' SUFFIX GV88-808-11 GV166-838-20 U y GV88-808-6 GV166-838-5 1" NPT VALVES WITH 'V' SUFFIX DISC GV198-959-2 GV166-838-20 & 21 1" NPT VALVES WITH 'E' SUFFIX l y GV198-959-4 GV166-838-5 1" NPT VALVES WITH 'V' SUFFIX C0IL HV27-502 \ / AC VALVES WITHOUT 'K' PREFIX HV77-566 \/ AC VALVES WITH 'K' PREFIX GV38-793 /\ DC VALVES WITHOUT 'K' PREFIX U GV79-370 F / \ DC VALVES WITH 'K' PREFIX DISC GV60-452-18 CORE ASSY (AC) GV162-355-19 ALL M.0. VALVES WITH 'E' SUFFIX y y GV162-356-22 0 U (DC) ISSUED 11-26-80
+
( IDENTIFICATION OF CRITICAL C0f1P0NENTS IN VDSS 3.4 GENERIC FAftILY VALVES (BULLETIN NP8317) CRITICAL SUB-ASSEMBLY WHICH CONTAINS
! NT CRITICAL PART Oft i NT VALVES WHICH CONTAIN CRITICAL PART NAME NUMBER PART NAME DRAtlING NUMBER DISC GV60-452-18 CORE ASSY GV75-769-1R ALL VALVES WITH 'E' SUFFIX GV75-769-2R jf GV75-769-4R If GV60-452-9 GV75-769-1J ALL VALVES WITH 'V' SUFFIX GV75-769-2J y if if GV75-769-4J y DIAPHRAGM FV64-835-3 \ /\ / ALL VALVES WITH 'E' SUFFIX DIAPHRAGM FV64-835-2 N/ \/ ALL VALVES WITH 'V' SUFFIX COIL HV27-502 A A ALL AC VALVES ,
C0lt / \ / GV38-793
\ ALL DC VALVES $
b I I e l ISSUED 11-26-80
l 1 l
'I * -
&{yt S
T ' R X X ' , ; A I I , P F F . - F F L U U X X X X 1 K A S S 2 I I I 1 I C X X f F F F 7 F F F F F X E 1 I T 'E
'V I
F F I F F U S U U U S S S P F R I R 2 P F I R X X U U X X E E i ' ' R R 0 C H H I I S S I I ' T T F F F F E Y E' 'V K P 'K. F 8 N I I F c F F ' ' ' '. ' - I W W U U 'V 'V U U ' ' 6 A S S ' ' S S H H H H T K T' K 2 T S S T T T T U U ' - N E E ' ' H H ' I I I I O O 1 O V V E E T T 'E E W W W W H H H H 1 C L L ' ' I I ' ' T T T T . A A W W S S S S I I I I D H V V H H H H E E E E V W W WW E U C T T S S T T V V V I S S I I E E I I L L L L S S S S S H S S W W V V W W A A A A E E E E S W A A L L . V V V t V V V V I R R S S A A S S . . . . L L L L S S B B E E V V E E T T T T A A A A E E V V V V V V V V V V L L L L L L L L S. S. S. S. L L L L A A L L A A T T T T C C C C A A A A V V A A V V S S S S A A D D V V Y L I M A L R M
/ \/ \
F A ' ' C E - M C I R E I T I R B M U N l l 9 4 9 M A X J J N R
/\ /\
N C 4 4 3 9 3 9 3 9 E G 5 S N I G N I W 7 1 0 7 1 0 5 4 0 6 9 5 5 4 0 6 9 5 5 4 0 6 9 5
- \/ \/
A A 1 1 6 6 6 6 6 6 3 S S T N O C R D V F V F V G V F V G V F G V F V
\ [\ /
D V N I H C I H Y S S ) ) ) ) ) )
/ \/ \ .
) W A C C C C C C A D A D A D S0 T2 N3 E8 Y
B L E M R E D ( Y ( Y ( Y ( Y ( Y ( Y
/\ \
NP ON P MN OI CT M E S S A BR T A N T R A P O L H C S j S S A E R O S S A E R O S S A E R O S S A E R O S S A E R O S S A O E R
\/ V/
LL AL CU IB E UA SP I D C C C C C C
\ [\ /
T( I R C F l 9 7 O l 4 8 5 1
- - 1 9 1 2 8 2 2 S 0 0 - - - - - -
N - 2 2 9 9 9 9 2 6 3 0 O T 2 2 2 9 7 I LN 8 8 5 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 6 T AE - - 4 j 4 g 4 ) 2 2 2 2 5 5 7 3 CNNR 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - A 0 0 0 6 6 6 6 7 7 8 9 C I E 0 0 9 9 9 2 7 3 7 I T B 1 1 6 6 6 9 F I M V V V V V V V V V V V V V I R U F F G G G G G G G H H G G T C N N E D I T - LN AE ' CN - IO t TPE C I MM S y 0 l y ROA I C CCN D
, l {fl! !
A ^ O IDENTIFICATION OF CRITICAL COMPONENTS IN VDSS 3.6 GENERIC FAMILY VALVES (BULLETIN NP8321) . CRIT CAL SUB-ASSEMBLY WHICH CONTAINS ' N NT CRITICAL PARTS T HAME VALVES WHICH CONTAIN CRITICAL PARTS NUMBER PART NAME DRAWING NUMBER DISC GV200-344-6 DISC HOLDER ASSY FV200-848-10 ALL VALVES WITH 'E' SUFFIX j . GV200-344-2 ( FV200-848-5 ALL VALVES WITH 'V' SUFFIX DISC, PRESS FV84-632-4 PISTON ASSY GV210-615-3 ALL VALVES WITH 'E' SUFFIX DISC, EXH GVl 9-644-32AM j j DISC, PRESS FV84-632-2 GV213-615-2 ALL VALVES WITH 'V' SUFFIX DISC, EXH GV19-644-32AF y } y DISC GV60-452-18 CORE ASSY (AC) GV60-453-AM ALL VALVES WITH 'E' SUFFIX ( CORE ASSY (DC) FV65-969-X j , GV60-452-9 CPRE ASSY (AC) FV40-453-AJ ALL VALVES WITH 'V' SUFFIX f i y } CORE ASSY (DC) FVCS-969-J } & U-CUP GV29-043-44-5 \ /\ / ALL VALVES WITH 'E' SUFFIX o GV29-043-44-R \ / \ / ALL VALVES WITH 'V' SUFFIX
'K' C0ll HV27-502 V V AC VALVES WITHOUT PREFIX HV77-566 /\ /\ AC VALVES WITH 'K' PREFIX GV38-793 / \ / \ DC VALVES WITHOUT 'K' PREFIX h/ \ 'K' y GV79-370 / DC VALVES WITH PREFIX ISSUED 11-26-80
4
~
IDENTIFICATION OF CRITICAL COMPONENTS IN VDOS 3.7 GEN'ERIC FAMILY VALVES (BULLETIN NP8323) CRITICAL CRITICIAL SUB-ASSEMBLY WHICH CONTAlhS COMP 0NENT COMPONENT CRITICAL PARTS NAME DRAWNING VALVES WHICH CONTAIN CRITICAL FARTS NUMBER PART NAME DRAWING NUMBER DISC GV60-452-18 CORE ASSY GV60-453-AM 1/16 & 3/32 ORF VALVES WITH 'E' SUFFIX GV60-452-9 GV60-453-J 1/16 & 3/32 ORF VALVES WITH 'V' SUFFIX GV60-452-15 GV60-453-N 1/8 ORF VALVES WITH 'E' SUFFIX GV60-452-24 U GV60-453-AS 1/8 ORF VALVES WITH 'V' SUFFIX FV100-820-11 DISC HOLDER ASSY FV101-749-11K ALL VALVES WITH 'E' SUFFIX y FV100-820-4 U FV101-749-4K ALL VALVES WITH 'V' SUFFIX C0ll HV27-502 \ /\ / AC VALVES WITHOUT 'K' PREFIX HV77-566 h/ \[ AC VALVES WITH 'K' PREFIX k GV38-793 /\ O DC VALVES WITHOUT 'K' PREFIX 7 0 GV79-370 / \[ h DC VALVES WITH 'K' PREFIX e i
- ISSUED 11-26-80 -
1
m m ^ IDENTIFICATION OF CRITICAL COMPONENTS IN VDSS 3.8 GENERIC FAf11LY VALVES (BULLETIN NP8344) . CRITICAL SUB-ASSEf'BLY WHICH CONTAINS , CRITICAL COMPONENT CRITICAL FART COMPONENT DRAWING VLAVES WHICH CONTAIN CRITICAL PART NAME NUMBER PART NAME DRAWING NUMBER U-CUP, GUIDE GV29-043-235 \ /\ / 3/4 & 1" NPT VALVES WITH 'E ' SUFFIX V V y GV29-043-23R 3/4 & 1" NPT VALVES WITH 'V' SUFFIX U-CUP, BODY GV29-043-295 /\ /\ 3/4 & 1"-NPT VALVES WITH 'E' SUFFIX j GV29-043-29R / \/ \ 3/4 & 1" NPT VALVES WITH 'V' SUFFIX DISC GV200-344-6 DISC HOLDER ASSY FV200-848-10 SINGLE SOLEN 0ID VALVES WITH 'E' SUFFIX y GV200-344-2 y FV200-848-5 SINGLE SOLEN 0ID VALVES WITH 'V' SUFFIX DISC, RESILIENT GV202-480-2 'N / / 3/4 & 1" NPT VALVES WITH 'E' SUFFIX y GV202-480-3 /\ / 3/4 & 1" NPT VALVES WITH 'V' SUFFIX h DISC GV60-452-18 CORE ASSY (AC) GV60-453-AM ALL VALVES WITH 'E' SUFFIX 7 ( CORE ASSY (DC) FV65-969-X j 7
~
GV60-452-9 CORE ASSY (AC) GV60-453-J ALL VALVES WITH 'V' SUFFIX y j CORE ASSY (DC) GV65-969-J y U-CUP, GUIDE GV29-043-495
\ /\ / 1/4 NPT VALVES WITH 'E' SUFFIX $ GV29-043-49R \ / \ / 1/4 NP1 VALVES WITH 'V' SUFFIX U-CUP, BODY GV29-043-515 X X 1/4 NPT VALVES WITH 'E' SUFFIX j GV29-043-51R / \ / \ 1/4 NPT VALVES WITH 'V' SUFFIX l
DISC, RESILIENT GV67-892-3 / \/ \ 1/4 NPT VALVES WITH 'V' & 'E' SUFFIX DISC GV60-452-15 CORE ASSY (AC) FV60-453-N 1/4, 3/8 & 1/2 NPT VALVES WITH 'E' SUFFIX j j CORE ASSY (DC) GV65-969-R j U-CUP, GUIDE GV29-043-195 \ /\ / 3/8 & 1/2 NPT VALVES WITH 'E' SUFFIX
$ GV29-043-19R M X 3/8 & 1/2 NPT VALVES WITH 'V' SUFFIX DISC , RESILIENT FV39-207-2 / \[ \ 3/8 & I/2 NPT VALVES WITH 'E' SUFFIX I "" ~
CONTINUED
CONTINUED IDENTIFICATION OF CRITICAL COMPONENTS IN VDSS 3.8 GENERIC FAMILY VALVES , (BULLETIN NP8344) . CRITICAL SUB-ASSEMBLY WHICH CONTAINS CRITICAL . COMPONENT CRITICAL PART C ONENT DRAWING VALVES WHICH CONTAIN CRITICAL PART NUMBER PART NAME DRAWING' NUMBER DISC, RESILIENT GV 39-207-4 \ /\ / 3/8 & 1/2 NPT VALVES WITH'V' SUFFIX U-CUP', BODY GV29-043-24S \ / \ / 3/8 & 1/2 NPT VALVES WITH 'E' SUFFIX k GV29-043-24R \/ \/ 3/8 & 1/2 NPT VALVES WITH 'V' SUFFIX C0Il' HV27-502 X X AC VALVES WITHOUT 'K' PR$FIX HV77-566 /\ /\ AC VALVES WITH 'K' PREFIX GV38-793 / \ / \ DC VALVES WITHOUT 'K' PREFIX y EVl9-370 / \/ \ DC VALVES WITH 'K' PREFIX DISC GV60-452-18 CORE ASSY (AC) GV162-355-19 ALL M.0. VALVES WITH 'E' SUFFIX $ u GV60-452-9 CORE ASSY (DC) GV162-356-22 GV162-355-17 U ALL M.0. VALVES WITH 'V' SUFFIX { CORE ASSY (AC) y u CORE ASSY (DC) GV162-356-19 U l l ISSilFD 11-2e-80
Autoitralic Switch Co. ee=mam
* ~ ~
ERVE ( m e _ . _ ,ese , _ . m . _ . _ ....... . .... l l 1
)
i l
)
l AQR-67368 APPENDIX C l
, COMPONENT REPLACEMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF ASCO CATALOG NP-1 VALVES
. ( l l l l l l l l l l l l l l _ _ . , . . _ . . _ . , , . _ , . _ , . . _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ . . .
}
CONTENTS ( SECTION PAGE 1 Introduction.............'.............................C-1
- 2. ASCO Cat alog NP-1 V alve Component Repl acement . . . . . . . . .C-2 2.1. Frequency of Valve Operation....................C-2 2.2. Normal and Abnormal Ambient Radiation Conditions......................................C-2 2.3. Normal and Abnormal Ambient Temperature Conditions......................................C-3
- 3. ASCO Catalog HP-1 Valve Maintenance...................C-4 FIGURE PAGE
- 1. Maximum Service Periods for Ethylene Propylene Terpolymer (EPDM) Elastomeric Components in ASCO Catalog NP-1 Va1ves...................................C-5
- 2. Maximum Service Periods for Viton Elastomeric
( Components in ASCO Catalog NP-1 Valves (Except Bulletin NP8316 Viton Diaphragms - See Figure 3).............................................C-6
- 3. Maximum Service Periods for Viton Diaphragms in Bulletin NP8316 ASCO Catalog NP-1 Valves...........C-7
- 4. Maximum Service Periods for Solenoid Coils in ASCO Catalog NP-1 Va1ves..............................C-8 1
[ s y- p ~m" .y--- y-oy - .,-e
-C COMPONENT REPLACEMENT I
AND MAINTENANCE OF ASCO CATALOG NP-1 VALVES
- 1. INTRODUCTION:
Periodic replacement of certain ASCO Catalog NP-1 valve compo-nents may be required during a valve's typical 40-year instal-led life in order to maintain the qualified levels demonstrated by this qualificatio.n test program. In order to establish a valve component replacement program, consideration should be given to the frequency of valve operation as well as the ambient service conditions associated with each specific valve application. In addition, a periodic surveillance and maintenance program should be established for all ASCO Catal.og NP-1 valves in order to assure that they will maintain their ability to perform a safety related function at any time during their installed life. ASCO recommendations for replacement of Catalog NP-1 valve components and the maintenance of Catalog NP-1 valves are outlined in the follow-ing sections. These recommendations are intended to provide general guidelines to be used in determining a Catalog NP-1 valve field component replacement and maintenance program They should not be considered as an extended valve warranty Wh e r, an ASCO Catalog NP-1 valve user determines that repl ace-ment of valve components is required to maintain qualification, , the required replacement components can be obtained as an ASCO C at al og NP-1 valve spare parts kit. These spare parts kits, which are designed for field installation, are available for each s p,eci fi c ASCO C at al og NP-1 valve model and contain all elastomeric valve components, as well as all components which
- _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - -- - u
l C-2
- 1. INTRODUCTION: -continued-are subject to wear as a result of valve cycling. In addition, separate spare solenoid coil kits are available for all ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves.
- 2. ASCO CATALOG NP-1 VALVE COMPONENT REPLACEMENT:
The following sections outline the exposure limitations and maximum service periods that have been demonstrated for ASCO Catalog NP-1 valve components by this qualification test program. Actual component replacement requirements may vary depending on the specific integrated actual service conditions a s t.o c i at ed with each valve application. ASCO recommends that Catalog NP-1 valve users determine the component replacement periods applicable to their valves by establishment of a surveillance program with periodic valve component inspection. (s 2.1. Frequency of Valve Operation: The wear aging simulation included in this qualification program has demonstrated acceptability of ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves to maintain their safety function objective after being exercized through 20,000 energized /de-energized cycles. When valves in actual service either reach this 20,000 cycle limit or when unacceptable component wear is found during the periodic inspection of valve components, it is ASCO's recommendation that they be rebuilt using the applicable spare parts kit and solenoid coil kit. 2.2. Normal and Abnormal Ambient Radiation Conditions: The normal and abnormal ambient radiation conditions simulated in this qualification program have demonstrated acceptability of ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves to maintain
-C 2. ASCO CATALOG NP-1 VALVE COMPONENT REPLACEMENT:
2.2. -continued- ) their safety function objective after exposure to a nonaccident dose of 2.0 x 107 rads TID of gamma radi a-tion. When valves in actual service either reach this 2.0 x 10 7 rad limit or when unacceptable component , degradation is found during the periodic inspection of valve components, it is ASCO's recommendation that they be rebuilt using the applicable spare parts kit and solenoid coil kit. 2.3. Normal and Abnormal Ambient Temperature Conditions: The thermal aging simulation included in this qualifica-tion program has demonstrated acceptability of ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves to maintain their safety function objective after a minimum of 8 years in a 140*F continuous ambient temperature. Since ASCO Catalog NP-1 valve component materials h ave been found to have different activation energy values as outlined in Appendix B to the main report, the thermal aging included in this qualifica-tion program has simulated different periods of iervice for different materials at any given ambient temperature. Figures 1 thru 4 indicate the maximum service periods as a function of ambient service temperature that have been developed by use of Arrhenius calculations for the four basic types of components included in ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves. These are: 1) ethylene propylene terpolymer (EPOM) elastomeric components; 2) Viton elastomeric components (except Bulletin NP8316 Viton diaphragms); 1
- 3) Viton diaphragms in Bulletin NP8316 valves; and
-C 2. ASCO CATALOG NP-1 VALVE COMPONENT REPLACEMENT:
2.3. -continued-
- 4) solenoid coils. The curves have been developed by use of the Arrhenius equation shown in Section 9.4.1.
(page All) of Appendix A to the main report. In all cases where Arrhenius calculations have indicated a maximum service period in excess of 40 years, the curves have been reduced to a 40 year value. It should also be noted that Figure 4 which shows the maximum service periods for solenoid coils in ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves has been calculated by use of the same Arrhenius equation but based on the additional testing as described in Appendix K to the main report.
- 3. ASCO CATALOG NP-1 VALVE MAINTENANCE:
( Installation and maintenance instruction sheets which outline the general maintenance recommendations are available for all ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves. These installation and maintenance instructions sheets are shipped with each order of ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves, as well as, each order for ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves spare parts kits and replacement coil kits. As indicated in these installation and maintenance instructions sheets, while in service, valves should be operated periodically to insure proper opening and closing. At a m'inimum, it is recom-mended that *alves in service be checked yearly for proper operation. Other maintenance recommendations which include periodic cleaning and inspection are outlined in each individual installation and maintenance instruction sheet. ( /ja
NOTE * /NMDEX TOMA/NTA/N QUAL /FMAT/CN, CATALOG NP-/ VALVES SHOULD BEEE8u/LT US/NG TNd APPROPX/ATB SPARE PARTS WNEMEVER/MD'CATED
&O BY THEPEK/OD/C /MSPEC7/0MQcygiyfcosppa</gyTS q 6WWNEMEVERANYWTHEfoilOW/MG LEVEL 6, S/Mul ATEDDVX/AfG t;?uAl/f/CA7/0M TEST /NG, ARE REACHED :
40 y 1. kVEAKA6/MG -20,0oo CYCLES
~
30 \ 2.24D/AT/0N AGING -2 x 10 lAAG
- 3. THEPMAL AS/NG - THEMAX/ MUM g5 SERYMEffR/QOINDMATEP BELOWFOR 20 %<TNEAPPUCABLESERV/Cf reuesxATuxe.
AMB/6VT
= s
\s +
i 8 Y 7 6 5 4 20*C 30*C 40'C 50'c 40*C 70 2 (48'F) (84*F) (/04'F) (/22*f) (Ho'F) (/58*F) j SEKYME AMB/ENT TEMPERATURE , l FIGURE / MAX / MUM SEAVEEPER/ OPS FOR EMYLEME PROPYLENE TERFONMER (EPDM) ELASTOMER /C COMPONENTS /NASCO CA7:4LOS NP-/ Vf4LVES BASED ONANACCELERATED THERM 4L 46/NG PERIOD OF /8 V4 D4fS AT 250'FAMB/fMTTEMFMd7VRE ANP DETEXM/MED BYARKHEN/US CACULAT/0NS US/NG ANACT/ VAT /OVEMER6Y pf4LUE OF 0 94'e V _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ - _ _ e.
- m. ^ r NOTE: IN ORDER ToMA/NTA/N QUAuRCAT/0M, CATAL OG NF-/ VALYESSNdulOBEREBV/LTUS/N6 THE APPROPR/ ATE SPAff PARTS WNfMEVfR/NDKATED BY 40 THEPERIOD/C/MSPECT/QVQFVALVECOMPONfMTS at WHfMfVERANYa*THEFol40W/^6 LEVflS 6/MULATED DUR/MG $UAUNCAT/0MTf67/N6, ARE bMCWfD :
o 40 f WEARA6/NG- 20,000 CYCLES 2.EAD/AT/0 MAS /NG -2 x /0IRAD 30 \ 3. THERMAL AG/MG -THEMAX/ MUM x \ SERV /CfffR/OD/MD/CATEDBELOW 25 y pog yyggpp peggig Sggy,cp
\ AMB/EMTTEMPffATuKE 1 20 1
\
h % t g /0 --- A
# 5 l
l 8 l l 1 fo 5 4 20*f 30*c 40'c 90*C 40L' 70'c (fo8'F) (8(**F) (f0ff) (/22*F) (/40'F)' (/58'F) SERV /CE AMB/ENT TEM 7EXATURE
/
F/G U R'E 2 MAX / MUM SERV /CE PEk/ODS FOR V/70N EMSTOMER/C COMPdMEN75
/NA6CO CATALOS NP-/ K4LVES(fXi'EPTBULLET/NNP83/4 V/ TOW D/APHKA6MS -
SEEF/GURE 3) BASEPdMACCELEKATED THEEMAL A6/NG Pff/OP OF 18f4 PAYSAT250*FAMB/EMT7EMPEFATUAE' AND DETERM/NED BYAARHEN/US CALCULA7/ OMS US/N6 ANACT/ VAT /0HENER6Y VALUE OF f.84e V
NOTE : /N02DERTOMA/NTA/MQUAL/ FICA 7/0N, CATAl0S NP / VALVES 6/MtMDBEREBu/lTUS/N6 TME APPROPR/ ATE . SPARE PAKKS JVNENEVER /NO/CAffD l (,0 i> Y THE FEET 0P/C/MSPEC7/0NOF VAL VE CMfA2NENTS ' l;f'WHENEVERANYOF THEftXlQW/NG t.EVEL6, 6/MulATEDDufMd QUAL /F/CA7/4V TfST/N6, Aff REMMED: . m 40 f. WEARA6/N6 - 20,000 CYCLES
- 2. MAD /ATIOMAS/AM - 2 x/0 ?RAD
\ m 30 \ 3. THERMAL A6iW6 - THEM4X/MUMSEXV/Cf
% PER/0D/NDICATfDBELOWF0K THf ES Q Affl/4'ABLFSEfV/CfAM8/fMT 4 \ TS/MRATURE.
f5 3 + 7 1a: 7 4 6 4 20*C 30*C 40*C 50'C 60*C M'd (48'F) (84*F) (/04*F) (/22'F) (/40*F) (/58'F) SERV /CE AMB/ENT TEMPERATUKE F/GURE 3 M4X/MUMSERV/CE FERIODS FOR V/75N D/APHRA6M9 /NB//llET/M NP 8 Nts' ASCO CATALOG NP-/ VALVES B4SGO ONACCELEKATED THERhfdl AG/MGMA/0D OF /8V4 DAYS AT 250*F AMB/EWT TEMPfRATdfE AND AARMEMH)Sd4LCULAT/0NS USIN6ANACT/VATION ENE;Wdy VALUE OP 0.96 eV
l 60 j 40 Q 30 NOTE: INOEDER ToMA/NTA/MW/Al/f/ CAT /0M, C/7ALd6 L NP-/ VALVESSNoulD BEEF 8u/LTUS/MG THE
% 25 Q APPROPR/A TE SPAREPARTS JVMENEVfK /MO/CATED 20 BYTNffER/0D/C /N6PEC770M OFVALVE COMFDMfMTS OK WHENEVERANYOfTHEFOLLOW/N6 Lfv6LS, 6/MULATED D//Z/M6 GUAL/// CAT /GN TEST /AtS,
/S AME KEACHED:
f WEAR A6/NG ~ 20,000 CYCLES l 2.RADMT/0NAS/M6 - 2 y /0 rap I0 3. THERMAL AG/MG - THEMAX/ MUM h
%} g '
SERV /CfPfR/OD/HD/CATEP BELOW FOK 8 THE APPL / CABLE SERV /CE AMB/fMT T TEMPERA 74/Ef l 7 l l 6 h 6 4 40*C 70'd 20*C 30'C 4'O'C 50*C (48'F) (86*F) (104'F) (122'F) (/40'F) (/58'f) SEKV/CE AMB/EMT TEMPERATURE F/6uRE 4 MAX / MUM SEKVICE PER/0DS FOR 60LENO/D CO/L S /N AfSCO CAMLOG NP-/ VAll/ES BASEDONACCflERATED THERMAL AS/NG)%R/CDOF 46 DJYS AT 322*FAMB/fMT 7EMfffA70Kf AND DETERM/NEO BYARRHEM/l/S CAldVLAT/OA/S US/NG ANAC7/V47/ddEMEK6Y VALUE OF /:00 e V
,,m.--- -,. HIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLAng
)
4
Ailloinalit Sivitch Cri. ee, = = & o< E Snce 1888 FLORHAM PARK.NEWJERSEY 07932 N.J.-(200 966-2000 N.Y.-(212) 344-3765 AQR-67368 ( APPENDIX D ISOMEDIX LETTERS OF CERTIFICATION FOR RADIATION EXPO 5URES G 4 - - .---- -w.--- .- - . . . - . . . g__,_ , _ _ _ , _ _ , , _ , _ _ _ _
~
O l h ISOMEDIX March 12, 1981 Mr. John Shank Automatic Switch Company Hanover Road Florham Park, New Jersey 07932
Dear Mr. Shank:
This will summarize parameters pertinent to the irradiation of eighteen (18) valves, Phase II, of your Purchase Order #PV-85588. The specimens were exposed for a period of 202 hours at an average dose rate of .90 megarads per hour. The calculated dose based on dosimetry is 182 megarads. Halfway through the exposure, the specimens were rotated 180 degrees to give a more uniform dose distribution. k Dosimetry was performed using Harwell Red 4034 Perspex dosimeter, utilizing a Bausch and Lomb Model 710 spectrophotometer as the readout instrument. This system is calibrated directly with NBS, with the last calibration being January 26, 1981. A copy of the dosimetry correlation report is available upon request. Irradiation was conducted in air at ambient temperature and pressure. Radiant heat from the source heated the samples some-what, but the temperature did not exceed 130 degrees F, as indi-cated by previous measurements on an o3.1 solution in the same relative position. Irradiation was initiated on February 15, 1981 and was completed on February 26, 1981. Very truly yours, ISOMEDIX, INC. i f ' David P. Constantine Production Manager DC:ns ( cc: Mr. G. Dietz . Isomedix Inc.
- 25 Eastmans Road. Parsippany, New Jersey 07054 (201) 887-2666
O isommoix January 22, 1981 Mr. John Shank Automatic Switch Company Hanover Road Florham Park, New Jersey 07932
Dear Mr. Shank:
This will summarize parameters pertinent to the irradiation of seventeen (17) valves, Phase I, of your Purchare Order #PV-85588. The specimens were exposed for a period of 33 hours at an average dose rate of .71 megarads per hour. The calculated dose based on dosimetry is 23 megarads. Halfway through the exposure, the specimens were rotated 180 degrees to give a more uniform dose distribution. Dosimetry was performed using Harwell Red 4034 Perspex dosimeter, utilizing a Bausch and Lomb Model 710 spectrophotometer as the readout instrument. This system is calibrated directly with NBS, with the last calibration being November 11, 1980. A copy of the dosimetry correlation report is available upon request. Irradiation was conducted in air at ambient temperature and pressure. Radiant heat from the source heated the samples some-what, but the temperature did not exceed 85 degrees F, as indi-cated by previous measurements on an oil solution in the same relative position. Irradiation was initiated on December 3, 1980 and was completed on December 5, 1980. i l Very truly yours, ISOMEDIX, INC. l David P. Constantine l Production Manager l l DC:ns cc: Mr. G. Dietz i Isomedix inc.
- 25 Eastmans Road. Parsippany, New Jersey 07054 (201) 887-2666
W Aulonittlic Swilch Cli. cessar m M s mo,ses ( FLORHAM PARK.NEWJERSEY 07932 N 1-L20t 96$-2000 N.Y-(212} 344-3765 l l l l e AQR-67368 APPENDIX E t MARGIN (
C CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1 Introduction......................................E1 2 Margin Applied to Qualification Test Parameters........................................E2 ( 2.1. Sei smi c DBE Simul at ion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .E2 2.2. DBE Radi at ion Simul at ion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E2 2.3. Env i ronme nt al DB E Simul atio n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .E2 3 Instrument Accuracy Considerations................E3
- E l-
- 1. INTRODUCTION: .
Margin is the difference between the most severe service condition specified for a nuclear application and the condi-tions used in qualification testing. The purpose of margin is to account for normal variations in the commercial production of equipment and reasonable errors in defining satisfactory performance, thereby providing greater assurance that the equipment can perform under the most severe service conditions for which it is designed. The recommended values of margin as outlined in Section 6.3.1.5 of IEEE-323-1974 have been considered and applied as applicable in this qualification program to all test parameters that affect the ability of equipment to perform a typical safety function. Although margin has not been applied in the aging phases of this qualification program, conservative methods have been used in determining all aging parameters. In addition, throughout all phases of this qualifi-cation test program, adjustments were made for measurement accuracy such that the actual levels of testing were at least as severe as specified in the qualification specification (Appendix A to this report). In addition, since ASCO has used conservative engineering practices throughout all design and production phases for ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves, margins wnich account for normal variations in commercial production are inherent in the ASCO Catalog NP-1 valve line.
- E2-l 2. MARGIN APPLIED TO QUALIFICATION TEST PARAMETERS:
2.1. Seismic DBE Simulation: Section 6.3.1.5 of IEEE-323-1974 recommends a 10% addi-to the acceleration of the response spectrum at the tion mounting of the equipment. The ASCO seismic DBE (SSE) simulation did not consist of a response spectrum type of test but rather consisted of a fragility test b ased on the levels of input motion. Therefore, the application of margin as suggested in IEEE-323-1974 is not applicable However, in order to the ASCO method of seismic testing. to meet the intent of IEEE-323-1974, ASCO has reduced the actual acceptable acceleration levels determined in fragility testing by 10%. 2.2. DBE Raciation Simulation: ( The required DBE radiation simulation dose of 163 megaraus has been increased by the 10% factor suggested in Section 6.3.1.5 of IEEE-323-1974 (to a dose of 180 megarads). 2.3. Environmental DBE Simulation: All actual temperature and pressure levels of the environ-mental DBE s im ul at io n have been reduced for the entire 30-d'y profile as suggested in Section 6.3.1.5 of IEEE-323-1974. In addition, the initial transient and dwell at the peak temperature of the environmental DBE simul a-DBE tion also were applied twice during the environmental simulation as suggested in Section 6.3.1.5 of IEEE-323-1974 Furthermore, the t10% v ar i at ion of voltage from the
- E3-
- 2. MARGIN APPLIED TO QUALIFICATION TEST PARAMETERS:
2.3. Environmental DBE Simulation: -continued- I r at ed value, as suggested in Section 6.3.1.5 of IEEE-323-1974, was exceeded during the environmental DBE simulation and the i10% time margin suggested in Section 6.3.1.5 of IEEE-323-1974 has been applied to the environmental DBE simulation by indicating in the main report that the 30-day test duration simulates 27 days of valve operation following the initiation of a design basis event.
- 3. INSTRUMENT ACCURACY CONSIDERATIONS:
Throughout all phases of this qualification test program-(both aging phases and DBE phases), adjustments were made for measure-ment accuracy such that the actual levels of testing were at least as severe as specified in the qualification specification (Appendix A to this report). lia e l
- 1. . .
Ankniinic Swilch Cri. ceJ=_= 6 M S . sees q FLORHAM PARK.NEWJERSeY 07032 N.Jr200 966 20C0 N.Y.-(212) 344-3765 AQR-67368 APPENDIX F METHOD USED FOR SELECTION OF THE QUALIFICATION TEST ITEMS { (
( CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1 Introduction.....................................F1 2 Common Technically Significant Design Parameter Variations.............................F1 3 'Jnique Technically Significant Design P a r ame t er V a r i at i o n s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F 2 3.1. VDSS 3.1 Generic Group.....................F2 3.2. VDSS 3.2 Generic Group.....................F2 3.3. VDSS 3.3 Generic Group.....................F3 ( 3.4. VDSS 3.4 Generic Group.....................F3 3.5. VDSS 3.5 Generic Group.....................F4 3.6. V D S S 3 . 6 G e n e r i c Gr o u p . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F4 3.7. VDSS 3.7 Generic Group.....................F4 3.8. VDSS 3.8 Generic Group.....................F4 TABLE NO. 1 Distribution of Common Technically Significant Design Parameter Varia-tions in the Qualification Test Items............F6 (~ . We u Iumu WMM
-F1-
- 1. INTRODUCTION:
The 14 valves identified in Table 3.2, Section 3, of.the main report were selected to represent the 8 generic valve groups identified in Table 3.1, Section 3 of the main report. Since many of the 8 generic groups of ASCO C at al og NP-1 valves included in this program are similar in both function and design, there is significant duplication of valve components from valve to valve within the entire ASCO Catalog NP-1 valve line as well as within each generic valve group. Consequently, determination of representative test items for qualification was made by considering both the distribution of the unique technically significant design p'arame te r variations within a single or several generic valve groups as well as the technical-ly significant design parameter variations which are common to I the entire ASCO Catalog NP-1 valve line. The following sections outline the actual distribution of both the unique and common parameter variations within the 14 valves selected for qualifi-cation testing.
- 2. COMMON TECHNICALLY SIGNIFICANT DESIGN PARAMETER VARIATIONS:
Table 1 (Page FS) indicates the distribution of common technical-ly significant design parameter variations in the 14 test items selected to demonstrate qualification of the ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves included in this program. Nine categories of technical-ly significant design parameters common to the entire ASCO Catalog NP-1 valve line have been identified and the representa-6
, . - e
-F2-
{ 2. _ COMMON TECHNICALLY SIGNIFICANT DESIGN PARAMETER VARIATIONS.
-continued-tion of available variations within each category are indicated for the test items included in this program. Because of the existing design similarity and duplicate. component utilization within the entire ASCO Catalog NP-1 valve line, most available significant design parameter variations are included in at least one of the 14 test items selected for this program. Two particular orifice size. variations are not included in the test items but are considered to be adequately represented by generally accepted limits of extrapolation from tne other sizes included.
- 3. UNIQUE T_E_CHNICALLY SIGNIFICANT DESIGN PARAMETER VARIATIONS.,
The distribution of technically significant design parameter ( variations which are unique to one or several, but not all generic valve groups included in this program are as follows: 3.1. VDSS 3.1 Generic Group: The lever actuated valve design utilized in the VDSS 3.1 generic group is unique to this generic group. This design, without' significant variation, is common to all valves included in the VDSS 3.1 generic group and is represented by Test Valve Numbers 1, 2 and 3 in this program. 3.2. VDSS 3.2 Generic Group: The metal upper seat design utilized in this generic (
-F3-
- 3. UNIQUE TECHNICALLY SIGNIFICANT DESIGN PARAMETER VARIATIONS: )
3.2. VDSS 3.2 Generic Group: -continued-group is included in the VDSS 3.2 and the VDSS 3.4 generic groups. This design, without significant varia-tion, is-common to all valves included in the VDSS 3.2 and VDSS 3.4 generic groups and is represented by Test Valve Numbers 13 and la in this program. 3.3. VDSS 3.3 Generic Group: The design of the pilot portion of valves included in this generic group is also common to the VDSS 3.5, VDSS 3.6, VDSS 3.7 and VDSS 3.8 generic groups. This design, without significant variation is common to all valves included in all'five of these generic groups and is represented by Test Valve Numbers 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 in this program. The diaphragm operated main valve design utilized in this generic group is unique to the VDSS 3.3 generic group. Two size variations of this design are available. The smaller size is represented by Test Valve Numbers 4 and 5 and the larger size is repre-sented by Test Valve Number 6 in this program. 3.4. VDSS 3.4 Generic Group: In addition to the metal upper seat design (Ref: Section 3.2 above), this generic group utilizes a quick exhaust shuttle disc design which is unique to the VDSS 3.4 generic group but common to all valves in this group without significant variation. This design is represented
. )
-F4-
- 3. UNIQUE TECHNICALLY SIGNIFICANT DESIGN PARAMETER VARIATIONS:
3.4. VDSS 3.4 Generic Groups: -continued-by Test Valve Number 14 in this program. 3.5. VDSS 3.5 Generic Group: The design utilized in valves of this generic group is the same as the design of the pilot valve portion of valves in the VDSS 3.3 generic group (Ref: Section 3.3 above). 3.6. VDSS 3.6 Generic Group: The design of the pilot portion of valves included in this generic group is the same as the pilot valve portion of valves in the VDSS 3.3 generic group (Ref: Section 3.3 above). The main valve portion of valves included in this generic group is unique to the VDSS 3.6 generic group. This design, without significant variation, is common to all valves included in the VDSS 3.6 generic group and is represented by Test V al.ve Number 9 in this program. 3.7. VDSS 3.7 Generic Group: The design utilized in valves of this generic group is the same as the design of the pilot valve portion of valves in the VDSS 3.3 generic group (Ref: Secti.on 3.3 above). 3.8. VDSS 3.8 Generic Group: , The designs of the pilot portion of valves included in this generic group is the same as the pilot valve portion (
- F5-
- 3. UNIQUE TECHNICALLY SIGNIFICANT DESIGN PARAMETER VARIATIONS:
)
3.8. VDSS 3.8 Generic Group: -continued-of valves in the VDSS 3.3 generic group (Ref: Section 3.3 above). The piston operated valve design utilized in valves of this generic group is unique to the VDSS 3.8 generic group. This design is available in 3 sizes. The smallest size i s represented by Test Valve Number 11 and the larger size is represented by Test Valve Number 12 in this program. The third size is not included but is considered to be adequately represented by generally accepted limits of extrapolation from the two sizes which are included. d e j
)
6
/ /
/ t/E t W/// -
f 9/s b\ ^ e/E l t 2E/// t 9//s t 26/6 f f f t// t 9//E e// 1
? ? ? Ef/C f 9///
t 99/g (S3H2N/)SE/S 3?/d/MO P P AVN -P ^ t t t t tt t t t tt t AVM-E Bd/13^ 7VA a t t t t t t t t Nol/A t t t t t t 9;'fffff, 9dA183nolsy72 O t t t 7V12/A! h t t t t t t t t tt t t t 1Me!7tsas adA19N/1Vas t t 7321 S ^ ttt ttt tt tt tt ssvag adA1 Aao9 2A7vi1 a P P ? ? ? ? ? ? /.soce'f&ig"E'#g l / 2/8f[$5N P P P P. t 1H9/1W31VM add 12M/7SC7JN2 G/0N370S t t 7VNIH821 Mrs?S t t t ttt t tt t t t 090V37 3dA17102 Ot0M370S f /TE ' tt o'03
? ?? ? ?? t*L/
t t o*H t t t tl S *0/ SN/1V211VM G/0M270S P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 2G t t t t t t JV 3dA1 7V?/N12373
#1 El El ll Gi 6 9 lL 9 5 V E 2 i S/n?/1V/HVA 279V7/VAY W313MVZYd )
22GIA'f7NJA7VA 1S31 NC/1V.7/d/7V/70 S/fil/1SE1 NO/2V.7/d/7Vf76 9M1 N/ SNO/1V/MV/1 WillMVWVdN9/SIG1NrD/d/N9/S A77F?/NH2fl 30NO/1/72/NAS/G V U72KL
-9.d-
)
9 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
)
Automulic Switch CU. oeJ=_r=;Rx M s ,see c FLORHAM PARK.NEWJERSEY 07932 N.J.-(20t 966-2000 N.Y-(212) 344-3765 l ( AQR-67368 APPENDIX G ASCO INSTRUMENTATION LISTS (~
( CONTENTS INSTRUMENTATION LIST: PAGE T h e rm a l Ag i n g S i m u l a t i o n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G 1 WearAgingSimulation............................................G2 P res sur i z at i on Agi ng Simul at ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .G3 ! Baseline Testing.................................................G4 ( V i b r a t i o n Ag i n g S im u l at i o n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G6 OBE Simulation, Resonance Search & SSE Simulation................G7 En v i r o nme n t a l DB E S im u l at io n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .G9 NOTES:
- 1. Refer to Appendix 'D' (Isomedix Letters of Certification) for r ad i at ion aging and r adi at ion DBE simulation i nstrumentation data.
( .
-- - --,,--- - _-,.------_.-m ._,_,_.,.~,7
,m _,.___..--,,,,,.__.,._.,.,,,,_r_, , , , - , , , _ . _ _ ,
THERMAL AGING SIMULATION INSTRUMENTATION LIST INSTRUMENT MANUFACTURER CALIBRATION MODEL NO. SERIAL NO. RANGE ACCURACY Pressure FREQUENCY Helicoid 410 VLPG-300-6 .0~300 psi 5% F5 4 months Gauge VLPG-100-1 0-100 psi VLPG-600-18 0-600 psi VLPG-200-2 0-200 psi VLPG-200-1 0-200 psi Voltmeter Weston _ 433 VLVAC-300-22 0-300 volts 0.75% F5 931 VLVDC-300-2 0-300 volts 0.5% F5 931 VLVDC-300-1 0-300 volts 0.5% F5 Temperature Indicator Doric OS-350 VLTI-480-1 0-480*F Electronic 1*F 6 months Counter (2) Hecon G04041891 ----- 0-999,999 N/A N/A f s Pressure ' Gauge (12) USG -----
. Pressure 0-160 psi Note 1 Note 1 Gauge (4) -----
Voltage General 0-200 psi Note 1 Note 1 Recorder Electric ----- 8CH7BAB17 Recording 0-150 volts Note 2 Note 2 Thermometer Blue-M RTF 7177740 0-650*F Note 2 Note 2 NOTES: 1. Thesestatus, gaugesi.e., were not calibrated since they were only used to aid in monitoring valve if a cylinder port was pressurized or vented to 'a tm o s p h e re . 2. These instruments monitoring rather thanwere not calibrated primary control . since they were only used for secondary
.^. ~ p WEAR AGING SIMULATION INSTRUMENTATION LIST
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___. ~ ~ - - ~~
~~~CALIBRATII)F
. INSTRUMENT MANUFACTURER MODEL NO. SERIAL NO. '
RANGE ACCURACY FREQUENCY Pressure Helicoid 410 ~VLPG-300-6 0-300 psi 151 FS 4 months Gauge VLPG-100-1 D-100 psi l VLPG-600-18 0-600 psi i VLPG-200-2 0-200 psi
" ' " VLPG-200-1 0-200 psi Voltmeter Weston 433 VLVAC-300-22 0-300 volts iO.75% FS f 931 VLVDC-300-2 0-300 volts 10.5% FS 9 w V V 931 VLVDC-300-1 0-300 volts 61S% FS --~
Temperature Indicator Doric 05-350 VLTI-480-1 0-480*F 11*F 6 months Electronic Counter (2) Hecon G04041891 ----- 0-999,999 ----- ----- Pressure . Gauge (12) USG ----- ----- 5-160 psi ----- ----- a Pressure i Gauge (4) V ----- ----- 0-200 psi ----- -----
-Voltage General Recorder Electric -----
8CH7BAB17 0-150 volts ----- ----- l 't
PRESSURIZATION AGING SIMULATION INSTRUMENTATION LIST b INSTRUMENT MANUFACTURER MODEL NO. SERIAL NO. RANGE CALIBRATION y Pressure ACCURACY FREQUENCY Gauge Helicoid 410 VLPG-300-52 0-300 psi +0.5% FS 4 months Pressure Gauge Helicoid 410 VLPG-300-36 0-300 psi +0.5% FS _ 4 months w _ _ _ _
R ^ r F l l BASELINE TESTING INSTRUMENTATION LIST CALIBRATION INSTRUMENT MANUFACTURER MODEL NO. SERIAL NO. RANGE ACCURACY FREQUENCY Coil Turns New Product Analyzer Eng. 2160-1-1 JT-99257-A-6 1-99,999 0.1% Daily i Hypot Associated 0-4000 Tester Research 404 VLHYP-4000-1 volts 3% FS 6 months , 1-100K Megohmeter Freed 1620 VLMP-20-1 megohms 5% 6 months 0-150 Voltmeter Weston 433 VLVAC-300-24 volts 0.75% FS 4 months 0-300 V 4 VLVAC-300-24 volts 2 y 0-250 v ' 37
._ Ammeter 433 VLMAAC-500-2 milliamps Pressure Helicold 410 VLPG-300-19 0-300 psi 0.5% FS 4 months Gauge 4 410 VLPG-300-38 0-300 psi 4 Ash roft 1188 VLDP-40-3 0-40" WC 1% FS U 4 VLDP-20-2 0-20" WC 4 0-150 0.75%FS Voltmeter Weston 433 VLVAC-300-7 volts 0-300 "
V " V volts Pressure Helicoid 410 VLPG-600-21 0-200 psi 0.5% FS Gauge ~VLPG-30-12 0-30 psi . 4- u u VLPG-30-15 0-30 pst Ammeter Weston 931 VLADC-10-4 0-10 amps 0-300 y V
" " VLVDC-300-2
_ Voltmeter volts m l
BASELINE TESTING INSTRUMENTATION LIST
-continued-CALIBRATION INSTRUMENT MANUFACTURER MODEL NO. SERIAL NO. RANGE ACCURACY FREQUENCY Flowmeter Fisher- 0-110 Porter 36 VLFP-20-1 cc/ min 3% FS 4 months Dwyer VFA 0-2 SCFH 5% FS !
1P tr V 0-2 SCFH 4 i Pressure Helicold 410 VLPG-300-4 0-300 psi 5% FS 4 months Gauge VLPG-100-31 0-100 psi VLPG-300-27 0-300 psi i VLPG-300-28 0-300 psi ,@ VLPG-200-11 0-200 psi a 37 1r VLPG-300-46 0-300 psi yr
'I VLPG-40D-1 0-400 psi Flowmeter Dwyer VFA VLFP-50-1 0-50 SCFH 5% FS Pressure Helicoid 410 VLPG-60-25 0-60 psi 0.5% FS 1r Gauge 4r Y VLPG-60-2 0-60 psi 4 Hypot Associated Tester Rese ar ch 404 VLHYP-4000-2 0-4000 volts 3% FS 6 months Voltmeter Weston 433 VLVAC-300-10 0-150 volts 0.75% FS 4 months Y f 4 Y 0-300 volts $
Pressure Helicold 410 VLPG-300-47 0-300 psi 0.5% FS Gauge 4 4 VLPG-300-11 4 Voltmeter Weston 931 VLVDC-300-3 0-150 volts l t t 4 4 0-300 volts Pressure Helicold 410 VLPG-30-60 0-30 psi y 3r Gauge + 4 VLPG-30-10 $ i
O ^ C. VIBRATION AGING TEST EnUIPMENT LIST NAME MFGR. MODEL SER.NO. RANGE . ACCNRACY INV.# CAL.FREQ. Valtmeter DC WD 81 ML325 0-0.25/1/2.5/5/10/25/ i3% ML325 6 mos , 50/100/250/1000 volts Power Supply Sorenson DCR150-15A 10 1 0-150 volts 0-15 amps .075% PD506 6 mos Amplifier LING CP3/4 16 5 Hz - 5 KHz 2% PE306 6 mos Exciter LING 175 30 1200f force 1" P/P disp. iS% Amplifier LING CP10/16VC 41914 5 Hz - 5 KHz 5% PE314 6 mas Exciter LING A300 59 6,000# force 1" P/P disp. *2% PE314 6 mos Log Converter AETC 4128 4116-541 Feq: 0-30 KHz .5db PE339 6 mos Output: 0-100 dB , O Charge Amplifier UD D11MGSV 903 1-1000G 2 Hz - 20 KHz 2% PE360 6 mos i Power Supply PCB 482A 502 Single Channel Gain: XI 2% PE383 6 mos Pressure Indicator USG 1404 PI-374 0-1000 psig 1% PI374 6 mos Pressure Indicator USG 1404 PI-375 0-1000 psig 1%, PI375 6 mos , l X-Y Plotter MFE 6K5 128517 1/10/100 mV 0.5% RE308 6 mos ' 1/10 volts 2 channels DC-2 KHz 12 channel 8" paper id8 RE344 6 mos Visicorder Honeywell 1508 15-1670 ,
- . . - . -. = - . . - . . _ . - - . . - .
j i i i l , OBE SIMULATION, RESONANCE SEARCH AND SSE SIMULATION NAME MFGR. MODEL SER.NO. RANGE ACCliRACY INV.# CAL.FREQ. Accelerometer PCB 302A 2857 1 Hz - 5 KHz 15% AC344 6 mos i l Accelerometer PCB 302A 2833 1 Hz - 5 KHz 15% AC359 6 mos i ' i Accelerometer PCB 302A 666 1 Hz - 5 KHz 15% AC375 6 mos Accelerometer PCB 302A 1807 1 Hz - 5 KHz 15% AC426 6 mos ' j i Accelerometer PCB 302A 1815 1 Hz - 5 KHz 5% AC433 6 mos Accelerometer PCB 302A 1820 1 Hz - 5 KHz 5% AC436 6 mos ! Voltmeter DC Weston 81 0-0.25/1/2.5/5/10/25/50/ 13% ML329 6 mos 100/250/1000 volts sw Step Attenuator 0.15dB W324 ! HP 350D 220-07110 1-110dB 600 ohms DC-1 M z 6 mos Scope, Storage , Tektronix T912 T9128015169 DC-10 Mir Dual Trace 13% 05305 6 mos Power Supply Trygon S36-2.50V 1525 0-36 VDC 0-2.5 Amp .01% PD330 6 mos Power Supply PCB 483A02 3% 6 channel Gain: XI *2% PE305 6 mos t Amplifier LING PP120/150 56 5-5 KHz *2% PE317 6 mos Ampl. DC 7 Channel Honeywell 117 0717U076 Gain: .01/.02/.05/.I/.2/ 12% PE386 6 mos
.5/1/2/5/10 ,
DC Amplifier Honeywell 117 1453 6 channel .01/.02/.05/.1/ *2% PE410. 6 mos
.2/.5/1/2/5/10 Pressure Indicator USG 1404 PI-373 0-600 psig- 11% PI373 6 mos Visicorder Honeywell 906C 9-9334 DC-2 KHz 12 channel 6" paper idB RE311 6 mos O
~ w a a _
I OBE SIMULATION fRESONANCE SEARCH AND SSE SIMULATION NAME MFGR. MODEL SER.NO. RANGE ACCdRACY INV.# CAL.FREQ. i Visicorder Honeywell 1508 161715R 12 channel - metric IdB RE347 6 mos Sweep Oscillator LING C0-100A 120 0.2 Hz to 5.0 KHz 1% SG321 6 mos 0.1 to 9.9 octave / minute RENTED EQUIPMENT:
- Electro Rent #40936 3325A Synthesizer cal due 7-13-81 Pressure Transducers
Model: ' S/N PA418-200-7 4272 l PA497-200-1 7 i O PA497-200-1 497
- j i PA497-200-1 493 .
I PA418TC-200-4 . 2702 1 l e 1
ENVIRONMENTAL DBE SIMULATION INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT SHEET Date 8'd8'E/ Job No. W~f) b Test Area 8*d' M- cNi=#M4e*FM Technician J '7"i//m u Custorner Asfdo Type Test leed Model Serial Wyle or No. Instrument Manufactwer Na Catstwaton Na Gov't No. Range Accuracy On Due i Dala Lnaaar- riu Ire n;ne/o 8 - 43.37o nr /Ji $. o2 *A 3 24 t/ 9 af il N lLel So.. Pr; A - 7~e r n _ % J Koo - 3009 m fe h/A 1-// K/ f // 1/ 3 nin/Jia</a- A%;/1L./ /3s - W ws sL//i 13 *A ll //1o i!.</.sr 1 Pu se--o % s/w J/o /in 3?cIn anst
'Wfts .rcom; t. J's: /-3 6/ ?. 3 r/
x Po- u sa.,,gs Ele c. si n _c non. -os - go.1 <.rd' as , J, srre a S. K/ _ 1 s R/ (, P.-e ss n, < Kya usive son - 92 sn sooms t /*/ r, 3 as si t. 23 r1 b e 1 lnstrument Test Engineer ' Checked & Received By [ A *** WII-1029 /
5l p l e u i 1 E D R - 2 t m 3 9 -
/ tu t E X a i a b r
/
h a a C
- c. n 1
. E 8 a n
n e. O . - v. r c 3 - 9 - I l o n 1 2 1
?
T i fr L E n o c t s s= y e E a e t s c a r u . s s. o. H A r T e A c c 0 m a S t s e e p y 4f G 4 % y T T T e g n i ( t- h B d N N R a f a t a t a e ie v O E M M M c e I R T A M r o o 7 3 3 & L U P l e N
't 9 d e
I W y v 4 7 M k c M I U G o 9 2 2 9 L h C e S 4 Q o E B E c la . RDL N 0 e n. i o r SeN A 7 f. T N O I 6 A A 6 E M T 4 le n A N do o 2- o O M N o r n 3 R I T N o e m o E 3 1 1 V N N b t s u E E J o C M e r r y <. v. U u - t . c c l _ a t k R f u e v L a n - T M a l a t i e c S rI t K N I _ e _ e n ig _ e t n _ I n E F e [ de- m u t e s 6 ts r M M M T
/
7 5 I n M M M t n e 3 n O D D m u r
)
a t s 2 In 0 i ic 1 n . - R e h o I l 2 3 t c N i _ a e w D T
ENVIRONMENTAL D3E SIMULATION INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT SHEET Page of Date M YI Job No. ll DI' ~ DO ' M'Ib Test Area E !O Technician N Ml) Customer b > I O Type Test I O ' 53 Model Serial Wyle or Calibration No. Instrument Manufacturer Now No. Gov't No. Range Accuracy On Due 1 ('. . A , \\<. f ci..f E<. it 6.ICI 9 ML -II,L 7t A 1l.'111 'N 31~7 4 - .M-4 Yh k 7 i t.. b9 k !I
'l (24,,,4non- RIT t., w ttP ni \a 1) R O L- ' un- t .% 3.\ wirt i 'ib1I41
.w
$ $ LA + 0\rie r k Gh-(, M h t-) FtT3 3 n)\6 if.hni4# .?l.%. Re T.1. t .
\h ,( T <x N C, S ny id)M A N lA NIP C 1% 34 & kt;M 3 \Db J4I ".>.-d it i L l MIT)
S Pn 6 Nie th wy ( h hIo,t Cc %sicc. (:mM t t Dio.
> b ?.l fi o\ nkt b @ t h %,e. ( E,(v IV !d f\) kO 30 V) A-%ME i 5.% l l ) .. \ /l .hk .h k! 2
'l C, h w v. Mau.ho\\ WlG N\n ~) e, t ,
c.. J' $% I w, We u,)aoko S 1, hu is,v. hafOd\k t\i\G N & As . ) s)
. f'.Qudld' ) * ',8\c l!.h I'!,1 7,\ h I Q '/
'l G n a w e. 6%cd,0N t\' In Alld '!.,0 % nGuM ! %. \l.hls I e,bi,)4 2 y owsw))
io t%p eia Mla 1. . .g, r, xJ1' .i ,% s.bo14 i .sieolo il (7 Wagt 4 d)tlO',\)oIk hkb hkh AC2) p. .M(l[ ,) Y)L. 3 h\{l .5\.)(;kil i? t t i,0, N \n b nuigt /\ll0 .%) L n.2etN $ v t, . 3 } ')i,\ g i r.) .i h) t il G nu n,e WA IT) )a /\)}A :W )) (1-wiM] i .s,% T)g \a,g l .g \ / .)
..i 6 a.m WA Nla Min ?,u 7 nas.M n ,% 3)3,lu . h, \ r-is m . q, w& Nls mig .'M y natel > ',% h lh .',b t. \.u.
l It C, n \ - l t <,4 MlA Mli) 3c1 E, 00iM J sl4> ')h lO J ).sih il (.% n Tfo[ir e MIA hl0 30 h O *.hd\ . _t i ,8 l, . M)g,\q) e ,\3.1/.., . li ( n.s b_ OlN .h a\} Nla ti l !0 3 o M. e .h.K .i t ,% Abu\.u , b.. ) 7 2. c lastrument Test Engineer N- W Checked & Received By W11- 102 9 l -
h7 ( ; i 8 l m 4
/,
c y F 2 s e - H u *> 9 e s C D 4 r m I y g o t u 9 I E p ar
'A n b f k la i g
u i c 0 l o C R g ff
- 9. r
[ n - f O 4 3 l C i i E
- A M/ 21 T C 7 E
2 5 si 2 8 E d - h *t n y g , e c e E t 8 c s a t s a r u y, g p s P S rs e H A r T e A c c (c 4 k,. S t s e e p y t u ei m m y T T B T e g n n o t r. i r ir d e N O N R a g o i a u c u u v ie I T E - o m ( h ( nr R c e AM L r o 9 7 3 3 & U P aN 9 5 d e ley 't o 8 M I 4 k W Gov 3 5 - c S U I 1 e E C a a f C 1 9 W h C D E B n la O ir a SeN I L N A O N E O I O I O C s- T MT N N 5 A S le do o . e su /o O A R 4 r M N ec A 0 o V T I . e a 3 3 o m o rf 1 1 NN E N b t o s u E J o C M r e r u ar d/ U t c a o Y E y R f u n s e r s L s. i J_ T a g l
# e M
E M c T t C g S t o u. t E
'E s i e 5 N S F r I
6 r Jr y e t
. e d P P M M At n
A ig t o . n I F n e n G M M n E t r s u
' M t r
s . t T e f t 7 A I n f i n t n 2 W r e M w i . i m
~ n o G I 61 Gi u
r 9 a P D 9 D t s 2 3 ic in 0 m i h n o 1 te a c e N l 2 3 9 it D T W
ENVIRONMENTAL DBE SIMULATION INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT SHEET Date 3-3I-7I Job No. 4-55 20 - o o Test Area loc 4 Technician b M.HcoPE# Customer A 6C 0 Type Test #NMAYl (NErr of W G Sot esloo t . Model Serul Wyle ar catitwatum No. Instrument Manufacturer No. Na Gov't No. Range Accuracy On Due
/ hs.mutrimEvtf gnerWLEY 130 92 Ilh MMLvf MSc .stEC . 2-9-Il F - 3*8l Y
O Wit-1029
,% R R ENVIRONMENTAL DBE SIMULATION INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT SHEET N SNO Test Area b O C8 ~ E*lV'#0*,We%FAL Date Job No.
O'b8 Customer ASCO Type Test A Technician - Model Serial Wyte or Calitwation Manufacturef N o. No. Gov't No. Range Accuracy On Due No. Instrument am% & I ?) 1 5"2 1 /krWte n %, .rn_- - - n oms w - l1977 saJ:r 1 DATA h,y as SL t/ A -e 12 t/o A - 9 414 C An ot,*r An // 21 - I - %'l /o -I- ?/ 3 1% J H7kssty florvs.m'e ? m fle 16a s - 202 so sr 3o vbe MfC ,2 - S- 81 7' S- ?! A R<sS' X bu 1 .5%9/$1BM .AA L/ /$
- 37 6 91<9n e - p es m Jrf 3 ~X7-?/ l'Al~SI b
i l i i f
.'c,-Ys d ',,
, 'In .
Checked & Rece.ived By f instrument Test Engineer ' ' M1-1029 I. [
ENVIRONM5NTAL DBE SIMULATION INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT SHEET , Date % s h1. M nnPER Job No. 45520 -on Test Area L ne_ D Technician 4 = 2 ~7 - R I Customer ASCo Type Test Posv Lot A - T.R . A sJb R E5 s %TAMCc' . Model Serial Wyle or Cahtwatson - No. Instrument Manufacturer No. No. Gov't No. Hange Accuracy On Due
~
i "b\ t . MutioMGTEK kEt rAL6 Y l19 I'3S t IMALvl M c s s !Ge.. 4 -2. 4 =10 9 ' 2.4= 8 8 2 MKauesmc7ER G EMGRAL RAbe0 l $$ 2 C- 2314 91981 MuLTe k 3*is l l - S- S O C-S- E l U
. i instrument Test Engmeer - -Q M Checked & Received By d /
wii-lo29 U
& & A ENVIRONMENTAL DBE SIMULATION INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT SHEET MO ~ ##' 7I 7 I
~
Date Job No. Test Area Technician Customer O Type Test #C#
# 'f # #
Model Serial Wyle or Calebratson No. Instrument Manufacturer No. No. Gov't No. Range Accuracy On Due 1 5lll Mefa, fjute 1oi.tg - 117ol %lt: Mrs s,, 9.24-it 7 -2 9- ft J Ali.' flefor Newlett Akn/ 39f.T A 94 2 U wig mig f,<e l- 21-fl 7 21-il
.1 DL fa. , saa,, a. .s,,e n s a , ocp iro s 1i3 o1 o - i.s o .isjag 3 i-ri 1- t- ri b
1 Instrument Test Engineer, , _ Mi>L _ A*-_) Checked & Received By < wil- 102 rj
O
-G17-1 4 - ~
c a s c T
~ s a a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o s s i N J w. ^n A n - s ?
; 4 ? Y ? ? ? Y P V g ,
3 x ,
- s. . .i a -
a a s o a i 9 g e i i i N n M o -o e- N 4 b e- 5 5 c. A A A A N *
, % n s t -
g 2 ,
~
S ~
. 1 s - ~ e a 20w 1 V
6 ? 2 7 ;A 5 9 3 5 Y Y m; ; n a a 4 a a f f 9 9 5 9 a s a a n y i s
\
% h p 2
*e
- A s A.A 5 i t & ; ;,.
A A = <) W d e q n L w s -e e s- .s a r I a ,:_ u s
- s. ,
s % a aw g g p g u s e w b. W w g, 4.i At M % 4.i +, " m
- c w W % k /
b & g k 'k k k g zZ 3 a a a 9 a , $, a a; t x 3 3 a s ta .: aw 4 ; 4 1 4 4 e i q ; 8 6 a t >< s sg w = 1 3I % 6 C t1 k *
- O O * # 8 G
55 m Y li t E 4 Jt e a = A 6
- 2 0
- A i A A A A .:
sm i o A i A A e s & e ia w O e $ t i 5 t O M 5# '
- g Z 2 l A $ I I l l I I \ k \ $ $'
yO c v % 2 ~ Ep 4 3 - > > - 4 6 8< *
'4 1 X l l 1
[ ( A Jt E 4 $F zz gia I l 4 I I I I e ) 3 1 x "W $a . E d s 3 N 2 t . { e, e-
$ m s . . s a ts .t .~ c w .$ L.
4 Y 3 ,A *4 N* Q S Q 'Q .y (y w R 4 g - - F = u 2 x \ W Z N w c 5
)
*
- S S * $ 3 'g R R D D E pi w g g % 4 4
*, *t D 3
4 ,? . a
$ z v % E s w w A 1 =
N 1 % u e w g , 4 t 8 2 g -
$ Sq d F% ,4 3 4 w T Q D t t 4 4, E % % 2 M
- w 3 % u Q wQ qn g
- t 'a O
,1 i
5 s
% % ; o w
w . 4 w
- k g g w
% w N % % N x x N w s
gN 4~ s d - c 4 % s g 2 3 3 3 3 u 7 *
~
,,* h I b j
l k k
- D 2 D h D 4 W h h N E 1 k $ k g! kh 888 U kk E N Q d l@ , ,
1 i j # - a m e- w > o- o- e R :: R Q R b t t g l o - l l
l 3 IO *c- 01 _ O / _ e
/ p .
u
. D T r, -
/
n - f o s g 1
~
ta r b i I la i C
- 0 /.
n 'f O f. Y
- < 3 7
< f f T
i # a
- M E I y
E a e t s c ar u p H r e c T c , A A I , S t s e e p y M I M y T T T e g n l l B d N N e l a l. i v R , C M M ie I T E R c e A L M r o o V, & U M I P l e y N t v 1 i 't k d e WG'o c S U I 1 e r , h f C E Q
- 1
(
- B E D " la o
t . r SeN L A N T r e N E O I
' N b
MT N 4 6 le d o. 1 r
, A O
R A o ' r M N / A
/
V T I e 1 P o m 3 NN E N b t o s u E J o C 1, M r e r u l U t c a E R f u n e l t T a l _ M e
- f S
'l l
I - N )% l I . r e
- e n
< ig
' t n
' n E
' e t
/ m s
- ' '3 u r d e t s I A T n A P t l I I M n i
- e e
- k ! m n u r
9 i a ts 20 R. ic h n o I n 1 te c N I
'J 1
a e 1 - D T W
ENVIRONMENTAL DBE SIMULATION INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT SHEET Date I- 2 2 - T / Job No. 465 L D Test Area ###f##### ! Technician J~ Pr[/e Iaol Customer 8 ICD Type Test IsrauShu.e! Model Serial Wyle or Calitwation No. Instrument Manufacturer No. No. Gov't No. Range Accuracy On Due I bt)u KeifAlev 130 - 9t.rs3 mat, ?l% t- s u- m o s n-si c2 Ot> M L////cv /So 94977 %4.r "I 2 sn 2 ? z-a l f l wit- I n2 9
m ENVIRONMENTAL 9 SIMULATION INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT SHEET . Date S-2T-FI Job No. 4-552,o Test Area LoCA Technician b M Mo*FFf Customer ASco Type Test ToDAY Cuw-T*oA/4 L (Post LocA) Model Serial Wyfe or Cahtwation No. Instrument Manufacturer No. No. Gov't Na Range Accuracy On Due a gic , ,,,,o , mevu ge ,,wer y 119 poggi it 3 3 mac7, ,,g,spee, r ii.yo -r. i t- yi 2 w maen ,,er u ge i rueg y i 19 335v4 0545 m atvi ,,u.sne . 5-if-ti t i-if-S i 3 dic , ,u.criciuva st. gr avu tsy 330 - 94753 ,,etvs ein.srec. ir- t t -fo F-st-Tl 0 Meslomrefes Stw. Andie Ifix C A37y 77371~ rnart ?3fo ~S'-6-8/ //-t-PI 5 pq?hl MuMMea KniMky iryy ,tos,, ty,e 1sy nrutTt $s?. E'l-IO E-/-fI a ai i l A Instrument Test Engineer - h A ( [g'thecked & Received By ( Wit- I n 2 9 'y 'M I
-G21-i i r i. 1 .. i 1 .
a
.. g_ . .
1 l .. , .
' ' l:.*T"r ' I '-f . : . o . . .
. i -i ..- t 1 ' . . i. - =._ . r . i. - .i , .- i 1 , ;.
i i r 1L'- . e .; . : i :, E ,. i.; 6 . p. 4 5 .4 , ) l ' _- t - p- :( :-j . - Ms 3.. . ;ic. y 'J_..L.; t 6 a-- -t- .4 t 2 1: t 3 . t- . '. _ t . .- _ y' j; .:.{=. . -,;; : l :--- t .s~ ,
' . I- - j .:a v 4 .. J :J r-- 's.. _
1r e : 1. ' - :.:s [ ..~ j. j i: r v -1 - - - r
, . g ey jr t .. . ):2:= ff. p u :. . - '
j .} - 6. f J l .:.- .r - t -
.. { . : } . .~ 7 . - , . 9 r. . ... .-
. . y ._
Z g .. : y;:.:.._ ,.g , .. .: ;_ y . : 7 :. p. 4 y -
.,; ;1. rr -L c . :n :fd ky c ; _ :.-- r_ -- _- ;al : r- ~ s a: - g _- ~ f ; s-- : :y- ;. , a l.
. -;:: ..:-": .: 4 : :. p....a y ..c ;; , .; . _ -:: , a.a - . [ g ..r .g :. . - -- .
* * =--
. , i O- .- r -; , i. :- x yg.r. -" a i ~ is .; .~j_ - yLt- f f.
, i. . .,_: .. .. . _ . . c: _ . + , , _ 2. :
g, ,g. r,.pa , .g.y . g ..:...,. 6- F- -!% )F~
,.: . p -. e - .
- .p
.. . a.
z
. j .: .a:
- .: : r'.-
. . . .* - - '4. -l-- . _F"' -M_ _ .
" - - - '.._!-2 :L :
- - - - - r--
- l. .- ;-.- - l P 8 i- --
L. > :. v: :- +.__ e :;. : .f Jr' f t .. C h_ 0:.: - .f;- ' . e..n_i C1. c.. _i_. a l: 2. . . J;I.J l _ _ .- ...'I., : _ __ l.J , . . . . y :. , z j -
...} : : --
S.s-'; :s=-. a: :; . - [ .. - L' .. f:. ; - x- _-{.._.... .q s. _ ._ j
-r. _
[ .-6-- - J. g . i. ?- : :d ' Li .s _.t .+. r. .f_- - - - ir. , r4 .. :.4 i i ilj . ,. ri., .,T:d -{ [., !' ;- _. . 3 -D .j. . :.=;.gru-ifr.:{= _f.: - :. y. -- .f. p , g_ - :.4:; g - j- .. ; . . t - i ; p . 4.._l4 i._ . .g. (a , i.- s. f- :j :j ]: i , =.y. . _E_ ri:; j--~4-t q- :i.;;.k :7 - ..; , -y.: t--yc- ;- j j.F.q-- .:, = ;-p -- -i- -J. 4 : 2 . 4
. ,4.: y .
- [ -t_T.s ; .T r;. .E=.?.: : .,= j-;.~i; [.-i . C [. .-2.~H p.=1, . ;;.c.- rgP 1% L. .:.. E d:.
8.:- , _ p . r. j .. { s
-Ei? f: ~~- i M"U~ -~ _IMMM- Ii #' rr- -' # '; G -j _ 14 f -- _-~ 1- t 2 4_ . ' . . z'i j
e- -,.: ;..zy M--fir -( m'ig.:- - 26 ).. a ta p.. pa@r, .gityg ;_.: 7. .: .:f r .--i-- [- - _:-- e. = ;i .- . "i . 1. I K.~.7- .
" "i.: _L: f=li :
. --y -l _ ra:J--L _::F2 0: _1 +. -;Ew1 z '__ :--: : z.r tea.: _- :- .: 3-r b- F- :
- r. ::Q -li_,j -- . . -+-k V? _.'. ;- l- ~ .x i ..- :r;. - -F- r- -
- c. - ra - :
.__u._ q- F 4: c.: . y-j- , : s s -3 s'-i , -C y . 1 ;. yL = :--- ?- .; L-l - s. : r . L- r --
, :. :_~ :ws': .
- i:_
,,= . ': a:.c 1 -4v . W j- f $ ; - ~r . -
- - ,~f- - -
s
- 5. >:f- f ,_ :.ja. a -- -
t ;s .-- s m'.5-l - _
~ -
--:-+.-t. { -. . s. r s s: a." v.__ pf-m-- .y _ uiva. . . ~ . = . . 5 . 4 . == .: :. : _.:,L p- ,
. .: , s:..
. . . _ . : ?. t r. ' , E .. T. .;a: J :/ ).: _O e .cz '- i si 'g.- ;;,; -- ,: . . ~=p ::r__ s_7- . r;,, ,_ ,, .y,,,,, , , , ,
7 4. [--- 6e . L' . t t rf ? . '< :C= = .3 -iq. 7. i ::.; j.p-- . a-.;y_-t, J __-[.- --r.+ : .hi.: :: -cs .J4,= . ] . 7 ,: .e .: .g-
. - - . i :. . 3 f_ r '--4.=- _Q.:.: -.ir :ripi r ;- r2 :. j -'. C ' t .:E: y. : 2:y.-r'_; L'J :. .:.. -- :' 1 .C [ 4 .2 g. rxi . 4- 4J .
- s. ^ .r i :.i 2, , i :. .:i n ti - ;_ --{ - e-p,I= " :. . [ ' . - 'arg - c :-.G- :i I .y- ;
c'.: r . ;r y-[. _ :-t s .--f-- - i ~ _ . p. r - N r .- J [. .-j J f ==-i.C7I-- . -' :1= : - ,r.,;f_::.g,.i;_ ; 7 . ;_:: . r ; .; i, ,;..sy ,. .
. .3. p._ ; _
L_ . , : i .
' ~_ :
!'d'.e::L-+ MW .hEJ- M5:!sI'-41 i -D-i.-- F:- J R_: . *"?51 89. di_ l h - t " WM--k- Frh f <i_. F'# #
?
-! -- L - . Y A ;=} :7: -,:;Q r :. :c :q.;q=CCaar -lis-d. ka i _E .~ i:.: . pi'E%. 22 f.:- ': I'd y :- k - ' J' ' e e
- a. . . i -y . r . h p h_ t.} t- - -- =:ti. :: .- :.:.'G;f--ig: :_ a.a f :3 7; ..-_u; . .g ; j _.__ . ' v.:. -r t . .. i. 1 .r._.< w
, , - 'it i e .: - : ,ri_5W'3l't 6 :-ii--iy::;-:; .; :=ry: -i -iL - -
t-- % _j EE1. j.;-C l- t- a- - ':+;- : - L5.- p:- .
, , , -i :. l .- % L;r =)P.;.::p:1:--;7.J :ier d:7 ;.: _ -
_ L_L:_.-~ r ' ; . .r;:. E-L C L. _
,a e -
s . .s : f. K .~~_--W-=1 Fj.:(W _
.:.-_..; y [ .+ 7 - :--- r%.: : - ^ i . :i - ? . e.-Wr .
s -af - r : -- L-G - . :. . r. w .: :. : .
*. 3% - . = -_M.: ;T z . a= -::: - q_ =.-p r,[=p_ :. g. : . i.q : ,: - .: (_; 3.Z %+., y. .j :- - y a g F .. & 7: f' _. T L- - 71= z.% - i-;:: 3--~'i_. .te I:: ?_ {}.; .3.f .4 .
TEi_J=i' J :idd .- -H= 3 i . '.= :J- .Pe ; - .
.: ..c e_;. +-- - -
.:==~ j i .M=s .: : .=f - - ' _i a@ 5 t=:t - - :.=.= 5-- 4 c= =ir- L L:. :
. p_1 .!. e..
f --i~ 2 O= .d# -P~a.-M.:=-1'+#. : $-~~N ::d@__l :S'W'l--5 i - W-MNF. E NM -W Y#M'- 4-- i- g er '- ' -
. ;J' _15 { #;'*Y-M'--i5MJi4-'#5 '"E '-*-i- *i - -T-- ~~*E- ~Ml-T; x:- :*'- --'!-I-l'*/ --- i- _ L.- ~ I T W i.~._- V_ - L i- .A=_ r.j g---p:' .g. -X :ks.hh EN :--.r.'- - fF --5._..'E .:=. --f_ ~~:_J- .Vs Qi --~.d-Jh.. A } : i ,.- # _.
- p. . l .4-i3-iJ'- i .2 ..G;-E;i _--N ' ::iCf-i,-i 5.;-i; -J i .i =. :fL35:-E_i -~._Ep: 7.i ? -J r; --iQi.:- r! #-
i . _a: r p_. LE .:..;t.: s :-U.c..9.:2:a:- 4#
^Q :=-5.}= ;=.r . .
#2-
__? f '- ;. = i. :2s.r L .s { .t. -( sc . .. i._ t . l .# - 'F 3 F^ - E_ _ E-5I-"- -- ' "e I '--@ 'sD-WC'*%- *U :-W _ErE --id ii .5 -
$U.1 -
i9: i-:1 "! ' 12 i . 3-' I'~
] ;:r r.i 7 . M : _^;'; =-!!- .i.jM _:[-fi E= :-E M_-ff -gi:A" .- j. ]: -p.1.'= .j-;- E - ':j -c-f_ -i . ;.-- [J --Mr_. . .-':e : -- * .- --: 2 y z .p- :- Efri; 3.f.7-j 5 1.j. -)=l _:.g.:j::i f._ b ; 3.:-3;tJ .-:- ;, t _- z.i_.i =-t.---;_ .- u . .: : _;+- n2 . !-.
[' ri _#~_^,5::: . 3- Ji-- 3
. . f.c "
l' .5. ,_ ' . Mhf; a.r a:.. r_3_ .:,;Jc ).) .5j j;.; _
,s ; - -iei. -
e
$ h .. i -: W ._4. =_. rr_ __:3 :.. 1.a. =rge. ! if ;_;_:= :-[:-c . .p. Nrtjj :.;_f j j =.- g .- j~r#.'I ;, - rc .-p a-
, t, b-m'=
M_ .:-X. f-di. .:n ' _ Q.1 -' =+: : l- l-t ..: ; - . :1.~;. .-f E...
~= f'- i 4' Li_ .1 . ,?
_ :?- :-
- j. , -
_.8-..- t _ _
.---a..+- 2:=:i--i- - ._ :i : ,N< -
; . _9. -;:3 j..y 4 :.
m
- 4 6 I
I ). ! .. F - ij , :q .n3 _Th .::i=i F:- --y- -m V.s ; .N,. #T . '. _l # :- : iii ' 7:!r_ ir.~_u_A rr. : j - t.. .-i -.. 1 - g I L. A i : n n:). JJ h. r4s - :-' #; # ,=r ^ g_firn ;+ n =:.= )d c%:'- p;:. .(- q- f.d e a '.
~
+-i.- m - .r-i {.- gL g b_ - k:.. F i. .uC. r9. r 3 .c_--i_-- : =-'5. i=_~* ~ JE =. .1.-i-..-.?-.- .r. . 2. A-- --k -j[ 1---- :p :n - ' T r-.-F--
- -4 .- ; t-Q , , . . .-_:.49-'---=. ,y ;--
;,_- -~,s .r . + .Et--j_n i e-J -05 -"Ti M '.F A. -E=itl . i. ik-6 .:i . - p-- i
$:-.-- r ii,
).-- :-Li .- i tr.E:-.:i;:tti- ,3 13-) 3':.
_f.? -iF _W'Q-N:# - ;d22f: _j "- & .r# -- - 4:- i k - I' e k h- A r -
. i." "T-~ =i+: 5*1 i r'-f= *-'42 =? - T:D'~5= '1'?E-%;' '~== F~.th~Si=- ? "T &:.$ - -N-- '- ' - ' %
, g fr -e 1_ - % y.-s_ u7-- r.'t_yp.[.= p'-Q _ _,f 8- Y- -c:F' M -Mjf t_r3a.'- '
- -J " .
i - E i-- i~ '- -d 4=M :: F#:!--F : .- =3 -# ' 5 -L.#d 2: -i-[ '#-r- 9 M #- "E I'd: t r -if\- !- Mi FIi-:D.-L E: --e - ! g [h' i . .: 1Q.2 y:=#; . -i- .i f a-via:_-9~._t#" ,Q , .x e.: .Ei ' ' j :.N : f. "r. _i- .-)=N * ) ."4 !- ' ! .. - : d }.j_- . -i y 4 --- g . .r.g .J r_,jij :_: ~= ?--% r J .:.3: pl.. .t -m r-~ j * = r. . : _-i r"_
. A [ i :. -
, "% _ - N_: f =r _i =i _ ._=d i _ ;-- . 2- 2_ rs-i . .M - - s; ..Cir !- .d E--i!] _ i - :-i. r # - N . ? U t" !4- 5 4n.: : T' - i t ~ ). _--- ii .t = T- I;_- - b, j , i ? :+ y b ' -h' * ~.f-N . (N- 3 -j-
-~
g _ __ ; : , - . !
.c T~ :...i 7: .: ;+;- U _ . i != 1 -7:
_f.if 2 .-i-C Jai. :. - .: ; i: 3 : .if; G 31:]-j :-[ A i . N -i- { '
- 8-i_" 3 ;YT:-O- . ";" 2--le5:_'"T!53-$: L '-f " t ~. ?~ ft ~'- t ' - T 1 .kli;f '- E I' 1 b ~T ' '
} CE . i--M 5:#H-F- 9 ' ; 'er ,. ' iW5__ :Q._g rm - il 3-? F-9 e b_-- k ' - t r i-f :F: F ' - i
.\- '
4 -- -'- 4, y r .a'-- :- . _: _ m_ : .-. i _ . _ ._. . . . X. .Jn.9 _ - M. i. - _ a: + M. .- - :-- .J - i.- - . - --. .: r I. ;: _
}\ # -
j gg - . r i-1. = i- !._-M i . . _. E.Q. .k .. f .'EIis. ..[ 21 i.m.. . @i[. J 'a-- i . 4 ..'?
'J m -.r 7 ,- - d N f '
i
.J. .: )
-.L ,- : -. is. . .
1 _ [.:.{ . g -.4- .- - l
- r r.i ; J 1-. } - L. - -. ..
F- i i .L _ e l y ,,, ,,
,e r . > : s.--- s- : - t .-" - 1 2' p = : f .. -m - F.r - 2 i-b c t .. e.- 1:# - - f- . ~. z:Q2-* . F J: ' f i r 4q .._;} . i. 7 t:rrj 9 -j u .r ^ .! ; - ) . t 4,J_,
f- c , ._ , .
!- y . e-j . ;- {.
.g.-
. . p. -p- j - ' s --- p. : r- l'
/ : :--h - j
;' 6 t -
{ 4 e
- 9 O O O e 1g
- 89 s) ==
-G22-g
(- n 61
--g 4
_$+ e mm. ee e g m-
." h. O N .
- ~
s
%a M -
.=-
m -. g _- - _ T
~
+---
N
-. .= 4
-,.y
Q i-pa mW B-4
( N ov D ~. w 3 w _ C a - t
^
' . . D p.
w
'.~
TW O& __'4g.
, ;8 _
y _.
;:l m. .~-
,0 y - "d - '
^~
,p
,e d_f t-
-- s
,2 -
a
<B y y
$g w
_=.
^ ^
;1--. _~m=.,"-- -
$ ~~5
,,3 _..u=_ .
.=
_ ~
= . .
b W y Q .
*r *
= . . _ . . .
k wh _ s _^ 3J -W ^ ME _
-_ h* .
[ {-
~
l { 1
~,,'
l -._ . I
- . - . . - - . -m--
I ( ,
=*h*h -e 4 e
-M.w i 4 w v tn e4
' o S.DGb
)
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK i
Antonittlic Switch CU. oe a m ::r = ;R x g. . Snce 1888 FLORHAM PARK,NEWJERSEY 07032 N.J.-(201) 966-2000 N Y-(212) 344 3765 AQR-67368 APPENDIX H ( SUPPLEMENTARY TESTI".G OF METAL SEATING BULLETIN 206-380, 206-381, 206-832, 208-266 208-448 AND 210-036 VALVE 5 ( .
~
(
- CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1 Introduction.....,,...,....................................H1 2 Test Program Procedures and Results.......................H2 i 2.1. Ag i ng S im ul at i o n P h a s es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .H2 2.1.1. We ar Ag i n g Sim ul at i o n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . H3 2.1.2. Vi brat i on Ag i ng Simul at io n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .H3 2.1.3. Se i smi c Agi ng (OBE) Simul ation. . . . . . . . . . . . . .H4
( 2.2. Design Basis Event (DBE) Simul ation Phases. . . . . . . . . .H4 2.2.1. Seismic DBE (SSE) Simulation................H4 2.2.2. Radi at ion DB E .S im ul at io n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . H4 2.2.3. Envi ronment al DBE Simul ation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .H5 2.3. Baseline Testing....................................H5 2.4. Post Test Visual Inspection.........................H7 l 3 Conclusion................................................H7 ! TABLE NO. l l 1 Baseline Test Summary.....................................H6 , (-
,,---,,,------,,w_.,
. , ,,,,..e,, . . , . , - , , . - - , _ - , . , , , , ,-, , , , , , , . ,,,._e,- , ..n..-_n-- . . . . _..-. .w- -. - - -.._.,
-HI-
- 1. INTRODUCTION:
As indicated in Section 4.1.1 of the main report, shortly ) after the start of the thermal aging simulation, it was noticed that Test Valve #1 (210-036-lF, 120/60) had developed excessive internal. leakage and was not completely venting its cylinder port upon de-energization. Subsequent ex am i n at i on of this valve following its removal from the thermal aging test set-up showed that mechanical binding between the disc and the seat of this metal seating construction was the cause of this occurrence. Qualification testing of this valve was not continued. As a result of this occurrence ASCO has recommended to all, customers who have purchased similarly constructed valves that 'dditional a lubrication, which has been found to prevent disc / seat binding, be applied or that valves be rebuilt with a new phosphor bronze seat material which has been found to produce satisfactory long term valve performance. In addition, the construction of this valve group has been modified so that this new seat material is standard. In order to demonstrate qualification of this improved design, an additional valve was added to the qualifi-cation test program. This new valve (206-832-6F, 120/60) was exposed to all test phases except thermal aging, pressuriza-tion aging and radiation aging. These test phases were not included on the new valve in order that the test program could be continued without significant delay. The exclusion of these phases is justified since the metal-to-metal seating components of this valve are not subject to degradation as a result of exposure to the environmental influences in the ,
l
-H2-l
- 1. INTRODUCTION: -continued-excluded phases. The following will summarize the specific testing conducted on this valve.
- 2. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULTS:
As indicated above, the subject valve was subjected to all qualification test phases, except thermal aging, pressuriza-tion aging and radiation aging and was operated under l o ad throughout all other phases of testing. Spec i fi c al ly , qualification testing of this test item consisted of the following: 2.1. Aging Simulation Phases: The aging portion of the qualification test program for this valve consisted of three sequential aging phases which were designed to simulate the most severe expected { levels of all potentially degrading conditions associated with normal and abnormal service. Consideration was given, during the determination of aging parameters, to ASCO Catalog NP-1 valve maintenance recommendations, as l outlined in Appendix C to the main report, wherein ASCO C at al og NP-l' valves may require, depending on actual , i , service conditions, periodic repl acement of solenoid j coils or elastomeric valve components during the l installed life period of the valves. 2.1.1. Wear Aging Simulation: l Following completion of initial baseline testing as described in Section 2.3, this valve was subjected to wear aging simulation in { i
-H3-
- 2. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULTS:
2.1.1. Wear Aging Simulation: -continued-accordance with Section 9.4.2 of AQS-21680/Rev. C as described in Section 4.1.2 of the main report, except that the total number of wear aging cycles was increased from the required 20,000 to 50,000 in order to demonstrate the improved long term performance of this design modification. Specifically, this valve, in a room ambient temperature, was subjected to 50,000 (minimum) energized / de-energized cycles, using a gaseous nitrogen supply, at this valve's maximum operating pressure differ-ential The valve was operated at a rate of 8 energized / de-energized cycles per minute whicn allowed for full pressurization and venting of all valve cylinder ports during each cycle. At the completion of this aging phase, the test items were subjected to baseline testing as described in Section 2.3. 2.1.2. Vibration Aging Simulation: Following completion of the post wear aging simulation baseline testing, the test valve was delivered to Acton Environmental Testing Corp. and subjected to the required vibration aging simulation in accordance with Section 4.5 of AQS-21680/Rev. C as described in Section 4.1.5
. of the main report. j l
h
-H4-( 2. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULTS: -continued-2.1.3. Seismic Aging (OBE) Simulation:
Fo l l o wi n g completion of the vibration aging s im ul at i o n , the test valve was subjected to seismic aging (0BE) simulation at Acton Environ-ment al Testing Corp. in accordance with Section 9.4.6 of AQS-21680/Rev. C as described in Section 4.1.6 of the main report. . 2.2. Design Basis Event (DBE) Simulation Phases: The design basis event portion of the qualification tast prog ra n consisted of three sequential exposure phases which were designed to simul ate the most severe expected levels of all potentially degrading conditions ( associated with postulated accident environments. 2.2.1. Seismic DBE (SSE) Simulation: Following completion of the seismic aging. simulation, the test valve was subjected to seismic DBE (SSE) testing at Acton Environ-mental Testing Corp. in accordance with Section 9.5.1 of AQS-21680/Rev. C as described in Section 4.2.1 of the main report. At the completion of this test phase, the test valve was returned to ASCO and subjected to baseline testing as described in Section 2.3. 2.2.2. Radiation DBE Simul ation: Following completion of the post seismic DBE ( , simulation baseline testing, the test valve was delivered to Isomedix Inc. and subjected to
-H5- .
- 2. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULTS_:_
)
2.2.2. Radiation DBE Simul ation: -continued-r ad i ati on DBE simulation in accordance with i Section 9.5.2 of AQS-21680/Rev. C, as described in Section 4.2.2 of the main report. Following , completion of this test phase the test items l l were returned to ASCO and were subjected to l baseline testing as described in Section 2.3. j 2.2.3. Environmental DBE Simulation: Following completion of the post r ad i at i on DBE t simulation baseline testing, the test item was delivered to Wyle Laboratories and subjected to l environmental DBE simulation in accordance with Section 9.5.3 of AQS-21680/Rev. C as described in Section 4.2.3 of the main report. Following 1 completion of this test phase, the test valve was returned to ASCO and subjected to final baseline testing (Refer to Section 2.3), followed by disassembly and inspection of the valve's component parts (Refer to Section 2.4). 2.3. Baseline Testing: The valve was subjected to baseline testing' at various points throughout the test program in order to determine the condition of the test valve and for comparison with performance at other stages of the test program. This testing was conducted in accordance with the require-ments of Section 9.3 of AQS-21680/Rev. C as described in Section 4.3 of the main report. The results of this testing are summarized in the following Table:
l
-H6-19n y
w NOffO O/y 4 x . .
~
m ~ O f 0 I g T 2 gI 8 a 4 3 M 0 8% 1r X M* 9{ 5 is Y 0 k 0 E 2 O6 0o
*g
" f 1e D %
#sj
~
0 mo V
$ di As 2 8
m @
# E l E 'S o j i y y ul 9x =
m M v v - - x 8
/s4 a e
o e o y\ ~N I OI 0 0 2 O g gg p a
~
a o 5 4 8 8 AI 3 T
< a E W I C / FM -
4 0 0 5 b
~
- 22 S o Q 4
( $ $ # '/sy # E # $ 0 z5 4 ## 2 x Io 8l o w l >(2
$$ % 2 0 D 92 0 3 M M 5t N 0 e e II 4 7 0 0 c-s a: e$ )v 2 s2
$e g e
as - AW ES e v "g 7F
/j# ' d i I i i W 8 *,
I
)a
$ .. 4/ 8 M i g k
<g z_
N
. O 3"v($
- v
(* v O O 2 o yo , R, _ w te
- = =
m O o o 2 A2 2 . k.0 %
=g*
V 8 8 T
= o d a d S S- wi "8 m W W W W E ES r ie "
G W G W o 1 E
- o I 5 Y 5 Y 0 08 0 2 z* 8 C
8 5 8 5 8 ~W E h e . .S ? = R wT M y y Eo S a y Oe 38 G o x 522b*i. cg s3 m=SJ mmet G 3 = - mn mm$s Wi 5F - 5g SN 382. gEG- - W so = d Jg w35"z Gm d' 0 * <G"i 0 5 "0 ad S^ 8 ( 5*5ep db $20 2 $Wo w ~ E9 EG QE 4 eroes WiM$d me 50 E ., m-50
-z rU -SE"-5 m
~
n! E 55 ss C5 EW w e b m K
=><-= v< vr SS.e ms.*sa mz e om w- -- <
f j . . -
-H7-
- 2. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULTS: -continued-2.4. Post Test Visual Inspection:
Following completion of all required testing, the test valve was disassembled and visually inspected for evidence of degradation resulting from the exposure j environments of this test program. All valve components i
- were found to be in good condition considering their l
prior environmental exposure.
- 3. CONCLUSION:
Since this valve performed satisfactorily throughout the above described testing, the design modifications made to improve this design are considered to be acceptable and fully qualified.
/ja I
( Automnlic Switch CU.
,<0 e e s.~e . semsex ezes , ~. <,e,> ..eee ~.x.<,,,, , ..,
oe=r=; o<
~~ E* .
AQR-67368 APPENDIX I ( TESTING CONDUCTED TO DEMONSTRATE IXTENDED MAXIMUM SERVICE PERIODS l FOR ASCO CATALOG NP-1 VALVE SOLENDID COILS
- - - - e anw.., - - - - . - , - - -- _ _ . . . _ _ , , _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ , _ _ ,
CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1 Introduction..............................................I1 2 Equipment Description.....................................I1 3 Test Program Procedures and Results...................... 12 3.1. Ag i ng S im ul at i o n P h a se s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 2 3.1.1. Therma l Ag i ng Simul atio n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I2 3.1.2. We ar Ag i ng Simul atio n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 3 3.1.3. Pres surizat ion Agi ng Simul ation . . . . . . . . . . . . . I4 3.1.4. Radi atio n Agi ng Simul atio n. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ( 3.1.5. Vi bration Agi ng Simul ation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I4 3.1.6. Sei smi c Agi ng ( OBE) Simul at ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 3.2. Design Basis Event ( DBE) Simul at ion Phas es. . . . . . . . . . I5 3.2.1. Sei smi c DB E (SSE) Simul ati on. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 3.2.2. Radi at io n DB E . Simul ati on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I6 i 3 2.3. Envi ronment al DBE Simul atio n. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I6 3.3. Baseline Testing................................... 17 l 3.4. Post Test Visual Inspection........................ 110 4 Conclusion................................................Il0 TABLE NO. 1 Baseline Test Summary (Valve #15).........................I8 2 Baseline Test Summary (Valve #16)........................ 19 ( .
. + --w-=t -e,-w - ---s-- , - - - ,
-II-
- 1. INTRODUCTION:
Previous laboratory testing conducted at ASCO has . indicated I that the solenoid coils contained in ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves will perform satisfactorily for longer service periods than were demonstrated by the thermal aging simulation described in Section 4.1.1 of the main report. In order to demonstrate extended qualification of these solenoid coils, two ad di t io na l valves, which were subjected to greater equivalent thermal aging simulation, were included in the qualification test pr og ram _d e s_c e,1 b ed, i n the main report. Since the coil system used in these two additional valves is generically equal in design to the coil system used in all ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves, the successful performance of these two additional test valves has been used to extend the maximum service periods for solenoid coils in ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves as indicated in Appendix C to the main report.
- 2. EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION:
The two additional test items which were included in the qualification test program to demonstrate extended replacement periods for the solenoid coils were both ASCO Catalog NP832070E, 120/60 AC valves with Class 'H' leaded coils and explosion proof / watertight solenoid enclosures. These valves are normally open, 3-way constructions with ethylene propylene elastomers and are members of the VDSS 3.5 generic f amily as indicated in : Table 3.1 of the main report. These valves are identified as
\
Test Item Numbers 15 and 16 herein, j 1 l
-I2-
- 3. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULTS:
The two test items as identified in Section 2.0 above were subjected to all phases of the qualification program and all test loadings potentially degrading to the solenoid coils of ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves. Since these valves were included only to demonstrate extended replacement periods for the solenoid coils, they were not pressurized during any phase of testing. With the exception of the extended thermal aging which was performed as described below, the qualification testing of these items was conducted coincident with and to the same levels of testing as the qualification testing performed on the 14 test items as described in the main report. Specifi-cally, qualification testing of these test items consisted of the following: { 3.1. Aging Simul ation Phases: The aging portion of the qualification test program consisted of six sequential aging phases which were designed to simulate the most severe expected levels of all potentially degrading conditions associated with normal and abnormal service. 3.1.1. Thermal Aging Simulation:
- Following completion of initial baseline testing as described in Section 3.3, the two test items were subjected to thermal aging s imul at ion which consisted of exposure to a minimum temperature of 322*F for a minimum period of 15 d ay s . Aside
(
I
,I 3 -
- 3. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULTS:
3.1.1. Thermal Aging Simulation: -continued- I from the variations in aging time and i;emperature, the simulation conducted on these test items was in accordance with the requirements of Section 9.4.1 of AQS-21680/Rev. C. During this thermal aging simulation, the test valves were subjected to a minimum of 10% of the 20,000 cycles of wear aging as required in Section 9.4.2 of AQS-21680/ Rev. C. Specifically, the test valves were operated through a minimum of 1,900 energized /de-energized cycles during the first 24 hours of the thermal aging simuletion and were subjected to an additional 100 (minimum) energized /de-energized cycles spaced evenly over the remaining portion of the thermal aging simulation for a total of at least 2,000 energized /de-energized cycles. When not being cycled, the test items were continually energized. Electrical inputs were at nominal voltage values during periods of cycling as well as periods of continuous energization. 3.1.2. Wear Aging Simulation: Upon completion of the thermal aging simul at ion as d e s c~r i b e d above, the two test items were subjected to the remaining required wear aging s imul at ion as described in Section 9.4.2 of AQS-21680/Rev. C. Specifically, the test valves, in a room ambient tempe,rature, were subjected to 1
- 3. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULTS:
3.1.2. Wear Aging Simulation: -continued-an additional 18,000 (minimum) energized /de-ener-gized electrical cycles by application of nominal voltage at a rate of 8 cycles per minute. At the completion of this aging phase, the test items were subjected to baseline testing as described in Section 3.3. 3.1.3. Pressurization Aging Simulation: Upon completion of the post wear aging simulation baseline testing, the two test items were subject-ed to pressurization aging simul at ion in accord-ance with Section 9.4.3 of AQS-21680/Rev. C as described in Section 4.1.3 of the main report. [ 3.1.4. Radiation Aging Simulation: Following completion of the pressurization aging s imul at ion , the two test items were delivered to Isomedix Inc. and subjected to radiation aging s imul at i on in accordance with Section 9.4.4 of AQS-21680/Rev. C as described in Section 4.1.4 of the main report. At the completion of the radiation aging s imul at ion , the test items were returned to ASCO and subjected to baseline testing as described in Section 3.3. 3.1.5. Vibration Aging Simul ation: Following completion of the post r ad i at i on aging s imul at ion baseline testing, the t wo test items were delivered to Acton Environmental Testing
- 3. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULTS:
3.1.5. Vibration Aging Simulation: -continued-
)-
Corp. and subjected to the required vibration aging s imul at ion in accordance with Section 4.5 of AQS-21680/Rev. C as described in Section 4.1.5 of the main report. 3.1.6. Seismic Aging (5BE) Simulation: Following completion of the vibration aging simulation, the two test items were subjected to seismic aging (0BE) simulation at Acton Environ-mental Testing Corp. in accordance with Section 9.4.6 of AQS-21680/Rev. C as described in Section 4.1.6 of the main report. 3.2. Design Basis Event (DBE) Simulation Phases: The design basis event portion of the qualification test program consisted of three sequential exposure phases which were designed to simulate the most severe expected levels of all potentially degrading conditions asscciated with postulated accident environments. 3.2.1. Seismic DBE (SSE) Simulation: Following completion of the seismic aging simula-tion, the two test items were subjected to seismic DBE (SSE) testing at Acton Environmental Testing Corp. in accordance with Section 9.5.1 of AQS-21680/Rev. C as described in Section 4.2.1 of the main report except that fragility levels were not determined for these two valves since they were not pressurized during testing. At the
- 3. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULTS:
{ 3.2.1. Seismic DBE (SSE) Simulation: -continued-co'pletion m of this test phase, the test items were returned to ASCO and subjected to baseline testing as described in Section 3.3. 3.2.2. Radiation DBE Simulation: Following completion of the post seismic DBE simul at ion baseline testing, the two test items were delivered to Isomedix Inc. and subjected to radiation DBE simulation in accordance with Section 9.6.2 of AQS-21680/Rev. C as described in Section 4.2.2 of the main report. Following completion of this test phase, the test items were returned to ASCO and were subjected to [ baseline testing as described in Section 3.3. 3.2.3. Environmental DBE Simulation: Following completion of the po s t-r ad i at i on DBE s imul at ion baseline testing, the two test items were delivered to Wyle Laboratories and subjected to environmental DBE s imul at io n in accordance with Section 9.5.3 of AQS-21680/Rev. C, as ! described in Section 4.2.3 of the main report. Specifically, both of these valves were included in the first group and were subjected to the temperature / pressure profile as indicated in Figure 4.1 of the main report. Following comple-tion of the environmental DBE s imul ati on, both valves were returned to ASCO and subjected to a
-I7-
- 3. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULTS: .
)
3.2.3. Environmental DBE Simulation: -continued-final baseline test as described in Section 3.3, followed by disassembly and a visual inspec-tion of all components (Ref: Section 3.4). 3.3. Baseline Testing: Both test valves were subjected to baseline testing, at various points throughout the test program in order to determine the c o n d i t i o ri of the test valves and for comparison with performance at other stages of the test program. This testing was conducted in accordance with the requirements of Section 9.3 of AQS-21680/Rev. C as described in Section 4.3 of the main report. The results of this testing are summarized in the following tables:
)
-I8-
)
(, '
%' 8 oe '
g o s m T M h = edoo a 9 h 0 0 g /
- F o oso g %a o ow a
2 oQ R
# D 0 e p &
- g x 9
i 0 8 g
- oo og l $
a - o N $ u
<3 Ssj 2 hh 1 V
0 y ,o 5 s l e
% 7 s f =
N E 1 8
~
= @t a
o Ah d,- k T
", *0/j .o y <
e
- 0 0 0 3 y @
4 g $
% =
m,e
- u ; O g w u. 5 M y g; o
( " 2 sy g g Qa5 s4ley u O
- i
' $ UV34
- 0*
O k e 1, 30 t y & o o T w 0 u n - l 5 -
~
mS a-8 c - 8 g-3 2 Al 2 0 A 1 8 y T
~
$ '*/
a s f b
=
82 m at E 2 W2 w E"hn N c c kN RE W W e e U o8 8 G S G G GE
- m**
NS r E m e 5 e 5 5 0 5 "
'N 3 "
((E 50 o a 0 8 C E E *n5 W % eN g " o " = c 5 ;$ m a A zE vo a M" .W a $ E I EddW" C**8 So se we? 8W clS! WS 5 0 i2 ."
$$8e$
>. w e Q$ GN 8E3!
te s ~- sm 5a i m a0 5*
"e s"_ G a h
(. . W5ee5 Ow"50 WP d'* 5W "d "" ( a ,50lWj "E 1 W w
=S E
e
#5 p!B " %
Ee 58 W mbaud e- em 55 o ambj e 58 er as c W E s:2 W E SW SW WE o* MS. E E55 0". 55 W $ o
_ .-. __- e. _ .a s __z.- i
- I9-w igg' A e E @ y E od
- oso o
e T 2 ) 0 o og o s a < . g
% %,# 2 E35*oki
- %< l a -
o! O i 8 2 '$ E _
- O e _ oo8
~
I 4 N g " l 9 4 2 o! I l ! =
= f ,o a y o
! o /g S g N h D ! = - o u z gg g 7 a p l h N
- AI $
f ( s p . z D h c _ t 2 w
= 03 g g 5 -
0 m = 0a g l ~ c
- 9 0m y j
Y I k
^
Dy%
- A p y o e 4 <sg .
@ 5 1 E 01 'O 1@
~ ~
0 b
= 03m 8 E o b d2 TR a
=
h Ax I vs D os %* ! s o V
? s,%
$ v [ =
=
ai
-g +
r I o s={
=
t - ow g s
= 0I T b-4 w
ey WW $T Rs e e " 4 25 e s e 5 e e-E d 5 5 5 E Ee lw' d=me
- a - = 5 = 5 se R
~
g b W a W e 0 me 0 e
@ 2
. . e. e w a w a .W =
%w 5eEb4 =5 o -R wY M = I 2 E we2 i de ga ag g g l
I Mwg8"2 Wiag g g$ g gg gi gg g ,,, - t $ sa 5 #" $o , e D M0 "$ wE5"= 5s'l 5*5Ep -- 5e o 50 4i 0 J en 8 -- I I dWop$ - "d * ~"S t { agj " CE$W & Es 45 m EdM0"
=>< E d*
eu ow dM 55 a= mo 3{ m a =,8
- wE 55
-= mm88 m
- *w -i
"* "~
===, E 85 cs 5 5. g j l
l r
-110-
- 3. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULTS: -continued-3.4. Post Test Visual Inspection of Test Items:
Following completion of all required testing, the two test valves were disassembled and visually inspected for evidence of degradation resulting from the c?.posure environments of this test program. All valve components were found to be in good condition considering their prior environmental exposure.
- 4. CONCLUSION:
Since the coils in both of these valves performed satisfactori-ly throughout the qualification program, the extended maximum service period for Catalog NP-1 valve coils demonstrated by the aging simulation included on these test items is considered applicable to all ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves.
* * ~
1 f THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Atikntrutic Switch CII. o e J- =_ . r m E ( FLORHAM PARK.NEWJERSEY 07032 N.Jr(201) 966-2000 N.Y.-(212) 344-3785 s AQR-67368 APPENDIX J { TEST VALVE PERFORMANCE l t l l C - l l
Le CONTENTS TABLE NO. ( l Summary of Test Valve Performance......................J1 2 Acceptable Acceleration Levels Demonstrated by the Seismi c DB E (SSE) Simul ation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .J4 O \ l
. .. = _ -. _ - - - _ _ _ - - -
TABLE 1
SUMMARY
OF TEST VALVE PERFORMANCE TEST ITEM NO. VALVE DESCRIPTION VALVE PERFORMANCE (*) ~ l 210-036-lF, AC Withdrawn from test program following opera-tional malfunction which occurred during thermal aging. A new valve construction was substituted and successfully completed this program. Refer to Appendix H to this report. 2 K206-380-3RVF, AC Acceptable 3 206-381-6RF, DC Acceptable 4 NP831655E, AC Acceptable 5 NPK8316A74V, DC During post radiation DBE simulation baseline testing, it was found that the Viton dynamic seals of this valve had adhered slightly to brass seating surf aces. As a result of this condition, this valve would not shift to its energized position on the first operation following the radiation exposure when minimum rated voltage was applied. On the 2nd day of the environmental DBE simula-tion, this valve would not shift position upon energization. Subsequent investigation indicated that this occurrence was caused by moisture induced degradation of the solenoid coil.
?
m.
- m. p.
i
- TABLE 1
- -continued-i-
- l. TEST ITEM NO. VALVE DESCRIPTION VALVE PERFORMANCE (*)
4 6 WJNP8316E34E, DC On the 13th day of the environmental DBE simula-p tion, this valve would not shif t to its energized p position with minimum rated voltage (90/DC) applied. Subsequent investigation indicated that this occurrence was caused by moisture
- induced degradation of the solenoid coil.
7 NP8320 A185V, AC During post radiation DBE simulation baseline i testing, it was found that the Viton dynamic seals of this valve had adhered slightly to brass seating surfaces. As a result of this , ,, condition, this valve would not shift to its i
- energized position on the first operation b following the radiation exposure whsn minimum '
- rated voltage was applied.
j 8 NP832063E, DC Acceptable 4
- 9 NP8321A2V, DC During post radiation DBE simulation baseline testing, it was found that the Viton dynamic l seals of this valve had adhered slightly to i brass seating surfaces. As a result of this j condition, this valve would not shift to its I
energized position on the first operation following the radiation exposure when minimum rated voltage was applied. j On the 12th day of the environmental DBE simula-1 . tion, this valve would not shif t to its de-energized position. 10 NP8323A38V, AC/DC During post radiation DBE simulation baseline testing, it was found that the Viton dynamic seals of this valve had adhered slightly to
) brass seating surfaces. As a result of this i
N
TABLE 1: TEST ITEM NO. VALVE DESCRIPTION VALVE PERFORMANCE (*) 10 NP8323A38V, AC/DC condition, this valve would not shift to its
-continued- energized position on the first operation following the radiation exposure when minimum rated voltage was applied.
11 NP8344A70V, AC During post DBE radiation simulation baseline testing, this valve would not shif t properly. 12 NP8344868E, DC On the 13th day of the environmental DBE simula-tion, this valve would not shift to its energized position with minimum rated voltage (90/DC) applied. Subsequent investigation indicated that this occurrence was caused by moisture induced degradation of the solenoid coil. 13 NP8314C28V, DC During post radiation DBE simulation baseline y testing, it was found that the Viton dynamic seals of this valve had adhered slightly to brass seating surfaces. As a result of this condition. this valve would not shift to its energized position on the first operation following the radiation exposure when minimum rated voltage was applied. 14 NP8317A29V, DC During post radiation DBE simulation baseline testing, it was found that the Viton dynamic seals of this valve had adhered slightly to brass seating surfaces. As a result of this condition, this valve would not shift to its energized position on the first operation , following the radiation exposure when minimum rated voltage was applied.
- Valves which were found to have minor performance anomalies but did not fit the " test failure" definition in Section 6.3 of AQS-21680/Rev. C (Appendix A) are listed in this Table as " acceptable". Refer to Table 2 for a summary of each valve's seismic perfor-mance.
-J4-(
TABLE 2 ACCEPTABLE ACCELERATION LEVELS DEMONSTRATED BY THE SEISMIC DBE (55E) SIMULATION ACCEPTABLE ACCELERATION LEVEL (I) TEST ITEM NO. VALVE DESCRIPTION DE-ENERGIZED ENERGIZED 2 K206-380-3RVF, AC 7.2g 13.5g(2) 3 206-381-6RF, DC 3.1g 13.5g(2) 4 NP831655E, AC 13.5g(2) 13.5g(2) 5 NPK8316A74V, DC 11.29 13.5g(2) 6 WJNP8316E34E, DC 13.5g(2) 13.5g(2) 7 NP8320A185V, AC 13.5g(2) 13 5g(2) 8 NP832063E, DC 10g 109 9 NP8321A2V, DC 13.59(2) 13.5g(2) ( 10 NP8323A38V, AC/DC 4.1g 6.7g 11 NP8344A70V, AC (3) (3) 12 NP8344B68E, DC 13.5g(2) 13.5g(2) 13 NP8314C28V, DC 13.5g(2) 13.5g(2) 14 NP8317A29V, DC 13.5g(2) 13.5g(2) NOTES: (1) All levels listed h ave been reduced by 10% to satisfy margin requirements. (2) The 13.5g levels listed indicate the maximum limit of testing rather than the maximum acceleration capability of the test items. (3) Acceptable acceleration levels were not determined for this test item since Acton Environmental Testing Corporation had an inade-quate gaseous nitrogen supply system to maintain the required inlet pressure. L - e w -- - _ . _ . _ .
I THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT' BLANK
1- 110111(1k ,Sddl CU. " oseeNTA LE CON ROL ( Sece 1888 FLORHAM PARK,NEWJERSEY 07932 N.J. 200 966-2000 N.Y-(212) 344-3765 AQR-67368 APPENDIX K { TESTING OF ASCO MOLDED SOLENDID COILS i
- (
l t
- - _ _ - - _ _ - _ . - _ _ - - - - - _:__-_. . - . - - _ _ _ - . . _ _ . . ~ . . , - - . -- . . _
CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1 Introduction..............................................Kl 2 Equipment Description.....................................K1 3 Test Program Procedures and Results.......................K1 3.1. Aging Simulation Phases.............................K2 3.1.1. Th erm al Ag i ng Simul at i o n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .K 2 3.1.2. We ar Ag i ng Sim ul at i on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .K 3 3.1.3. Pressurization Agi ng Simul ation. . . . . . . . . . . . .K4 3.1.4. R adi atio n Agi ng Simul ation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .K4 ( 3.1.5. Vi brat i on Ag i ng Simul at ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .K4 3.1.6. Sei smi c Agi ng (0BE) Simul ation. . . . . . . . . . . . . .K5 3.2. Design Basis Event (DBE) Simul ation Phases. . .. . . . . . .K5 3.2.1. Sei smi c DBE ( SSE) Simul ati on. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .K5 , 3.2.2. Rad i at io n DB E . Simul atio n. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .K6 l 3.2.3. Environmental DB E Simul at ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .K6 3.3. Baseline Testing....................................K7 3.4. Post Test Visual Inspection.........................K10 4 Conclusion................................................K10 TABLE NO. 1 Baseline Test Summary (Valve #17).........................K8 2 Baseline Test Summary (Valve #18).........................K9
l l 1
-K1-
- l. INTRODUCTION: l
)
As can be seen from examination of the results summarized in the main body of this report, the solenoid coils which were used in Test Valve Numbers 1-14 are susceptible to moisture induced performance anomalies which could occur under DBE conditions if the conduit system joints connected to Catalog NP-1 valves are not properly sealed. In order to eliminate the possibility of such occurrences, ASCO has developed a special nuclear grade molded coil which is highly resistant to moisture. Two valves containing these new molded coils were included in this test program in order to evaluate their potential for use in ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves. Environmental DBE testing of these valves was conducted with the valves continually energized with unsealed solenoid enclosure conduit connections in order ; to fully evaluate the moisture resistance of the coils.
- 2. EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION:
The two additional test items which were included in the qualification test program to evaluate the molded coil design were both ASCO Catalog NP832070E, 120/60 AC valves with the new molded Class 'H' leaded coils and explosion proof / watertight solenoid enclosures. These valves are normally open, 3-way constructions with ethylene propylene elastomers and are members of the VDSS 3.5 generic family as indicated in Table 3.1 of the main report. These valves are identified as Test Item Numbers 17 and 18 herein.
- 3. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULTS:
The two test items as identified in Section 2.0 above were i subjected to all phases of the qualification progr am and all
-K2-
- 3. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULT _S1 -continued-test loadings potentially degrading to the solenoid coils of ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves. Since these valves were included only to evaluate coil performance, they were not pressurized during any phase of testing. With the exception of the f act that these valves were continually energized during the 30-day environmental DBE simulation, the qualification testing of these items was conducted coincident with and to the same levels of testing as the qualification testing performed on the 14 test items as described in the main report. Specifi-cally, qualification testing of these test items consisted of the following:
3.1. Aging Simul ation Phases: The aging portion of the qualification test program consisted of six sequential aging phases which were designed to simul ate the most severe expected levels of all potentially degrading conditions associated with normal and abnormal service. Consideration was given, during the determination of aging parameters, to ASCO Catalog NP-1 valve maintenance recommendations, as outlined in Appendix C to the main report, wherein ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves may require, depending on actual service conditions, periodic replacement of solenoid coils or elastomeric valve components during the installed life period of the valves. l 3.1.1. Thermal Aging Simulation: Following completion of initial baseline testing as described in Section 3.3, the two test items
-K3-
- 3. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULTS:
3.1.1. Thermal Aging Simulation: -continued-were subjected to thermal aging s imul at ion in accordance with the requirements of Section 9.4.1 of AQS-21680/Rev. C as described in Section 4.1.1 of the main report. During this thermal aging simulation, the test valves were subjected to a minimum of 10% of the 20,000 cycles of wear aging as required in Section 9.4.2 of AQS-21680/ Rev. C. Specifically, the test valves were operated through a minimum of 1,900 energized /de-energized cycles during the first 24 hours of the thermal aging simulation and were subjected to an additional 1,000 (minimum) energized /de-energized i cycles spaced evenly over the remaining portion of the thermal aging simulation for a total of at least 2,000 energized /de-energized cycles. When not being cycled, the test items were continually energized. Electrical inputs were at nominal voltage ..iues ocing periods of cycling as well as periods of continusus energization. 3.1.2. Wear Aging Simulation: Upon completion of the thermal aging s imul at i on as described above, the two test items were subjected to the remaining required wear aging simul ation in accordance with Section 9.4.2 of AQS-21680/Rev. C as described in Section 4.1.2 of the main report. Specifically, the test valves, l
-K4- !
- 3. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULTS:
( 3.1.2. Wear Aging Simul ation: -continued-in a room ambient temperature, were subjected to an additional 18,000 (minimum) energized /de-ener-gized electrical cycles by application of nominal voltage at a rate of 8 cycles per minute. At the completion of this aging phase, the test items were subjected to baseline testing as described in Section 3.3. t 3.1.3. Pressurization Aging Simulation: Upon completion of the post wear aging simulation baseline testing, the two test items were subjected to pressurization aging s imul at io n in accordance ( with Section 9.4.3 of AQS-21580/Rev. C as'de-scribed in Section 4.1.3 of the main report.
~
3.1.4. Radiation Aging Simulation: Following completion of the pressurization aging simulation, the two test items were delivered to Isomedix Inc. and subjected to radiation aging s imul at ion in accordance with Section 9.4.4 of AQS-21680/Rev. C as described in Section 4.1.4 of the main report. At the completion of the radiation aging simulation, the test items were returned to ASCO and subjected to baseline testing as described in Section 3.3. 3.1.5. Vibration Aging Simulation:
. Following completion of the post radiation aging
{ simulation baseline tsting, the two test items
-K5- -
- 3. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULTS:
3.1.5. Vibration Aging Simulation: -continued-were delivered to Acton Environmental Testing l Corp. and subjected to the required vibration aging simulation in accordance with Section 9.4.5 of AQS-21680/Rev. C as described in Section 4.1.5 of the main report. 3.1.6. Seismi'c Aging (0BE) Simul ation: Following completion of the vibration aging simulation, the two test items were subjected to seismic aging (0BE) simulation at Acton Environ-mental Testing Corp. in accord an ce with Section 9.4.6 of AQS-21680/Rev. C as described in Section 4.1.6 of the main report. 3.2. Design Basis Event (DBE) Simulation Phases: The design basis event portion of the qualification test program consisted of three sequential exposure phases which were designed to simulate the most severe expected levels of all potentially degrading conditions associated with postulated accident environments. 3.2.1. Seismic DBE (SSE) Simulation: Following completion of the seismic aging simula-tion, the two test items were subjected to 1 seismic DBE (SSE) testing at Acton Env i ronme n t al Testing Corp. in accordance with Section 9.5.1 of AQS-21680/Rev. C as described in Section 4.2.1 of the main report except that fragility levels were i , not determined for these two valves since they
r
-K6-
- 3. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDijRES AND RESULTS:
Seismic DBE (SSE) Simulation:
~~
3.2.1. -continued-were not pressurized during testing. At the completion of this test phase, the test items were returned to ASCO and subjected to baseline testing as described in Section 3.3. 3.2.2 Radiation DBE Simulation: Following completion of the post seismic DBE simulation baseline testing, the two test items were delivered to Isomedix Inc. and subjected to radiation DBE simulation in accordance with Section 9.5.2 of AQS-21680/Rev. C as described in Section 4.2.2 of the main report. Following completion of this test phase, the test items were returned to ASCO and were subjected to baseline testing as described in Section 3.3. 3.2.3. Environmental DBE Simulation ~: Following compl et i o n of the pos t-rad i ati on DBE simulation baseline testing, the two test items were delivered to Wyle Laboratories and subjected to envi ronmental DBE simulation in accordance with Section 9.5.3 of AQS-21680/Rev. C, as described in Section 4.2.3 of the main report except that these valves were both continually energized at n omi nal vo l t ag e for the entire 30-day simulation. Specifically, both of these valves were included in the first group and were subjected to the temperature / pressure profile
3
-K7-
- 3. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULTS:
3.2.3. Environmental DBE Simulation: -continued-as indicated in Figure 4.1 of the main report. Since it was intended to evaluate the moisture resistance of these coils, un s e al ed downward directed street elbows only were connected to the solenoid enclosure conddit connections so that the steam atmosphere could freely enter the solenoid enclosures. Following completion of the environmental DBE simulation, both valves were
. returned to ASCO and subjected to a final base-line test as desccribed in Section 3.3, followed by disassembly and a visual inspection of all components (Ref: Section 3.4).
3.3. Baseline Testing: Both test valves were subjected to baseline testing, at various points throughout the test program in order to determine the condition of the test valves and for comparison with performance at other stages of the test program. Th i-s testing was conducted in accordance with the requirements of Section 9.3 of AQS-21680/Rev. C as described in Section 4.3 of the main report. The results of this testing are summarized in the following tables:
/ \
-K 8 -
'ee '
W y
.o f^
?
= 4 o
~
Y J ) o 2 y s s-m 590 W s , a 8a1 p 8 4 % g .I" 9I l og
- u 4 o I a
#Ssj N
kg h o 2 NY 2 j { O b o Jsz % $ - 9 g g h 0 E ~ 5 F
- s a b A
=
l 5 p J v g 9 o$a D8 5 0 8 - 8$ E
~ c %s w n1 y j g '
$ AM 7 g - 3449
( # E i , e z 4 2 O
% O b & 1 h -
~
g 5 % 0 L hw
.B f Ai I y /ni s u g -
~s.
0
= 4
's D . I
= X
=0=
S S El o e o c. 2 E-28 m a W a e r8 g w s = E [ 0 m =Y w g g
=Y c
E y 8 g 5 8 5 8 .* <
=2
- o. *Sm = r wT M y EEeteE E S "
i 05 .gE G g E g}g5$ C wW g, ww "G W Mw$5 2 W" g, gg;e gg ,_ ja Q. , , =g wts . ' am eo <= : s,s = s p _, W e- a OD E. , _W '- ' nG W g (.. 5*52~5 dWop -
.x E ._ ' W 5 55 si -
sv <ose se.: saa ., -
$w><ae- rE v- mz m WB E om c5 w-
=W t
-m--w,. 3,---,,w-gsp-----+ yew 9 g._-4._--g ,-, -.9-,,----,-----w----- .- _ ---e------ _._.r-w ---m- --------------*-m
l
~
r
's_ _g g-39g' p n W C e ol I a
T M $ -
' o6 OG $
I O O 1 E I ~ O 2 N$ Ay n 39g m W .a 0$ 0 e x $ $% 8 ,/ 00 m 4 u = ,, g ,
- O o. U l
<>s T O 8K 1
-x o s ; 2 ,
{
> .Q G l E g D
= % 5 0 m = 3 5 i N 3 p
S - N e 1
< g o . <
g c - a _ 83 8 l 2 5 @ o u - o 3 u ' n ~ T v nE 5 I ^S I l i
?@8
- s+,,, % 9 y a .
l 4
% o p S g
e = o k R i u m o u q
$.h d I
. h i U
Z AM 2
& p O*
$ I] lk 00 y "
h T O g 6h 0 (O O T1z E 2 w0 23 O 8
- o e o e S S-28 m M E M E E ES
- mn g g = g = -
e 0 w T w T
~ '
c E O L -
* =2 8 8 5 8 5 W .W i e . Sm = .R wT M y 59209E E S 4 Se ga G =
" l B2 C}j#$ ww "G <. W Mw$5 Wi g 3, w ggg,W;S gg , gm 3, , g was - am e= s e : = o me sa e 5*5ep dWop5 du 5. si ss "=e ~ c 13 eE w a9 a- rz - W 5 55 88 E r5 WiM0"
=>< E su v< ur 50 mz..SS .
E msn ., E em c5 sw w- -- < e . 1
'~. . . .- . . . . .
-K10-
- 3. TEST PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND RESULTS: -continued-3.4. Post Test Visual Inspection of Test Items:
Following completion of all required testing, the two test valves were disassembled and visually inspected for evidence of degradation resulting from the exposure environments of this test program. The valve components were found to be in good condition considering their prior environmental exposure.
- 4. CONCLUSION:
Although the coils in both of these valves performed satisfacto-ly throughout the qualification progr am , this new molded coil design will not be offered for use in ASCO Catalog NP-1 valves until additional qualification testing is performed. ( l l l i
. _ .}}