ML20083P136
| ML20083P136 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Limerick  |
| Issue date: | 05/18/1995 |
| From: | Gardner P PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20083P124 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9505240073 | |
| Download: ML20083P136 (45) | |
Text
n; ..
. . .x v 9.- e l ,C y!lp.j,.7 ,>
g ., ,. .. ,.
s <
.s
, w cm
< d;. '!1 5 , - , . 'j, t ' ,.i
, ' ,~.
[,j '1 A i7 *, ' V E
.yf.,, ! ', L ' i-'
. , n. .
, s
,'D',' , .. i e
- cF,
/ u y. .
.o g. .
kn .t
/
..- m. .
, j -
(( .
i i
,' y <
- ., . , "i ) '
- s, . g -l h. t 1
,_y;
> ,i
' ', ! . g..
[O /l ll y. f y i >ti a w,
t
/. , , ,
s
.\ ;.
G.~ ,
a ..: '
6 0
). ?
., . r l PECO Energy Company: ,
Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 s
,e f Startup Report Ecycle 4'
- 4
't Preparation Directed Bys' '
J. A. Muntz, Director - Site Engineering Prepared Bys-P,'A.' Gardner, Reactor. Engineer n
r l 9505240073 950518 l-PDR ADOCK 05000353 p PDR
PECO Energy Company .
Limerick Generating Station '
j Unit 2 --
Startup Report Cycle 4 Preparation Directed By:
J. A. Muntz, Director - Site Engineering Prepared By:
P. A. Gardner, Reactor Engineer 9505240073 950518 PDR ADOCK 05000353 p PDR -
i t
..e. '
Limerick Generating Station' Unit 2 Rerate Startup Test Report Page 1 of 44' L PAG:mbc )
TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 1.0 Executive Summary 2 L 2.0 Purpose 3
- 3.0 Program Description. 3 4.0 Acceptance Criteria 4 ,
i 5.0 Rerate Startup Test Program Summary 5 6.0.-Testing Requirements 6 6.1 UFSAR Chapter 14.2 Tests Not Required For 6 Power Rerate 6.2 UFSAR Chapter 14.2 Tests Recommended For 12 Power Rerate l TABLES ,
1 1 UFSAR Chapter 14.2 Tests 40 i 2 Test Conditions 41 !
3 Tests to be Performed for Power Rerate- 42 l FIGURES 1 Power / Flow Map 43 2 RCIC Acceptance Criteria Curves for Capacity and Actuation Time 44 l
1
o Limerick Generating Station L Unit 2 Rerate Startup Test Report Page 2 of 44 PAG:mbc l
LIMERICK GENERATING STATION POWER RERATE STARTUP TEST PROGRAM PLAN .
)
1.0 EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
I J
This Startup Test' Report is submitted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in accordance with the requirements of Limerick Generating Station (LGS) Technical Specification 6.9.1.1. The report summarizes the startup testing performed on LGS Unit 2 following implementation of Power Rerate during the 2R03 Refueling Outage. Power Rerate was implemented in accordance with Amendment of the Facility j Operating License No. NPF-85 and Operating License Change i Request No. 93-24-0 (Unit I will be re-rated upon completion of the next refueling outage IR06 currently scheduled for 1996).
The result of Power Rerate is an increase in reactor power equal to 5% of the. original rated thermal power. All testing identified within the LGS Updated Final' Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) Chapter 14.2 was addressed and evaluated for applicability to this increased licensed power i rating as required by Technical Specifications. ;
The Reactor Mode Switch was placed in the Startup position on February 17, 1995. The final synchronization to the grid was performed on February 19, 1995, marking the official end' to the Unit 2 third refueling outage. The new 100% power (3458 MWth/1163 MWe) was first achieved on February 24, 1995. All required Rerate Startup Tests were completed by March 2, 1995.
There were 12 Special Procedures (SP's) written and performed in combination with various Surveillance. Tests (ST's) described in this report, to successfully achieve the new rating. No adjustments were required to control systems for the following plant systems: EHC - Pressure Regulator, Feedwater, Recirculation, Reactor Core Isolating Cooling (RCIC), or High Pressure Coolant Injection (HPCI). All systems performed in a stable manner during the plant startup and during transient testing. The unit is operating' very well at rerated conditions.
o o
Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 Rerate Startup Test Report Page 3 of 44 PAG:mbc 2.0 PURPOSE This Startup Test Report summarizes the testing performed on Limerick Generating Station (LGS) Unit 2 following the implementation of Power Rerate. The result of Power Rerate is an increase in reactor power equal to 5% of the original rated thermal power. All testing identified within the LGS Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) Chapter 14.2 was addressed and evaluated for applicability to this increased licensed power rating as required by Technical Specification 6.9.1.1. The Rerate Startup Test Program Plan documents these evaluations and describes in detail the tests performed for Power Rerate. Each test performed for Power Rerate is described herein, including the test purpose, description, acceptance criteria and results. This report is submitted in accordance with the requirements of Technical Specification 6.9.1.1.
3.0 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION The power rerate startup testing requirements were developed primarily from the review of Chapter 14.2 of the LGS UFSAR, Section 10.3 of the GE Power Rerate Safety Analysis Report for Limerick 1 & 2, and the GE Power Rerate Project Rerate Confirmation Test Program. The results of this testing determined the unit's ability to operate at the rerated power 1.evel. The testing was conducted following the third refueling outage for Unit 2.
The majority of testing can be summarized into the following categories:
- 1) Verifying control systems (Feedwater, EHC - Pressure Regulator, and Recirculation) are stable at rerate conditions.
- 2) Verifying high pressure injection systems (Reactor Core Isolation Cooling, High Pressure Coolant Injection) operate acceptably at rerated pressures.
- 3) Data collection for comparison to original plant rated conditions (Radiation Surveys, Thermal Performance and Plant Steady State Data). ,
- 4) Turbine Control and Stop Valve Testing to determine '
adequate and safe power levels for future surveillance performances.
-s e
Limerick Generating Station
. Unit 2 Rerate Startup Test Report Page 4 of 44 PAG:mbc Test conditions at which the testing was performed are '
defined below. All testing with a Test Condition (TC) must be completed prior to proceeding to the subsequent test-condition. Reactor core flow can be any flow within the safe operating region of the power / flow map (Figure 1) that will produce the required power level.
Test condition Rorate Power Level Rorate Mwt 1 <85% <2939 2 85-86% 2939-2974 l 3 90-91% 3112-3147 4 95-96% 3285-3320 5 97-98% 3334-3388 j 6 99-100% 3423-3458 l All testing within a Test Plateau must be completed and approved by the Startup Test Director, prior to increasing power to the subsequent Test Plateau. Rerate Startup Test Plateaus are defined below. l Test Plateau A (191%) - Includes TC-1,2&3. Reactor Thermal Power cannot exceed 91%.
Test Plateau B (196%) -
Includes TC-4. Reactor Thermal Power cannot exceed 96%.
l Test Plateau C (198%) - Includes TC-5.- Reactor Thermal Power cannot exceed 98%.
Test Plateau D ($100%) - Includes TC-6. Reactor Thermal ,
Power cannot exceed-100%. !
4.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA Level 1 acceptance criteria normally relates to the value of a process variable assigned in the design of the plant, <
component systems or associated equipment. If a Level 1
- criteria is not satisfied, the plant will be put in a suitable hold condition until resolution is obtained. Tests compatible with this hold condition may be continued.
Following resolution, a'pplicable tests must be repeated to verify that the requirements of the Level I criteria are now satisfied.
Level 2 criterion is associated with expectations relating to the performance of systems. If a Level 2 criterion is not satisfied, operating and testing plans would not necessarily be eltered. Investigation of the measurements and the analytical techniques used for the predictions would be started.
o<
o Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 Rerate Startup Test Report h"I Page 5 of 44 PAG:mbc Any acceptance criteria failure must be documented on a Test
. Exception Report (TER).
5.0 RERATE STARTUP TEST PROGRAM
SUMMARY
The test program began when the Mode Switch was placed in startup on February 17, 1995 and ended with all required Rerate Startup Tests complete on March 2, 1995. The unit was synchronized to the grid on February 19, 1995, marking the official end to the Unit 2 third refueling outage. The new rerated 100% power (3458 Mwt) was first achieved on February 24, 1995.
1 In general, the unit operates very well at the rerated conditions. No adjustments were required to control systems for the following: EHC - Pressure Regulator, Feedwater, Recirculation, Reactor Core Isolation Cooling (RCIC), or High Pressure Coolant Injection (HPCI). All systems performed in a stable manner.
Data collected at rerated conditions showed that the 5%
increase in reactor power has little, if any, effect on reactor water chemistry and radiological conditions throughout the plant.
All Rerate Startup Tests were performed satisfactorily during the startup from 2R03 Refueling Outage. Table 3 identifies all of the required Rerate Startup Tests and the Test Condition in which each test was performed. There were no Test Exceptions throughout the test program, no Level 1 or Level 2 test failures.
Through startup testing, it has been determined that the Turbine Stop Valve test can be performed at 100% Rerated Power. In addition, it has been determined that Turbine Control Valve testing can be performed at 90% Rerated Power.
These numbers have been revised into the appropriate Surveillance Tests.
NOTE: One February 21, 1995 at 0308 hours0.00356 days <br />0.0856 hours <br />5.092593e-4 weeks <br />1.17194e-4 months <br />, while waiting for Thermal Performance Test to start, a full scram was received for both Limerick units. No g testing was in progress at the time and the cause was determined to be from an instability on the grid. The unit was kept hot and was restarted shortly thereafter. Since the cause was unrelated to the startup test program on Limerick Unit 2, the unit was brought back to 95% thermal power (TC-4) at 0400 hours0.00463 days <br />0.111 hours <br />6.613757e-4 weeks <br />1.522e-4 months <br /> on February 24, 1995 and testing recommenced at this time.
b
C I
Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 Rerate Startup Test Report Page 6 of 44 PAG:mbc 6.0 TESTING REQUIREMENTS Each of the tests listed in LGS UFSAR Chapter 14.2 were evaluated for applicability to power rerate. Section 6.1 lists the tests (numbered as designated in the UFSAR) not required to be performed for power rerate and the reasons for each determination. Section 6.2 lists the tests (again numbered as designated in the UFSAR) which are required for power rerate. A description of the specific testing to be performed is included. Table 1 identifies the UFSAR tests and their applicability to power rerate. Testing required to be performed for power rerate will be identified with the same numbering as used in the Initial Startup Program. Table 3 summarizes the testing to be performed and the test conditions for each test performance.
6.1 UFSAR Chapter 14.2 Tests Not Required For Power Rerate 6.1.1 Test 3 - Fuel Loading The purpose of this test is to load fuel safely and efficiently to the full core size. Fuel loading is performed in accordance with FH-605, Core Component Transfer Authorization, during every refueling outage. During the 2R03 outage, fuel will be loaded in accordance with FH-605.
Power rerate has no impact on this evolution; therefore, no additional testing is required.
6.1.2 Test 6 - SRM Performance and Control Rod Sequence This test demonstrated that the operational sources, source range monitoring (SRM) instrumentation, and rud withdrawal sequences provide adequate information to the operator during startup. Technical Specifications and plant procedures ensure proper SRM response during startup. This test does not need to be repeated for rerate.
This test demonstrated the ability to achieve criticality in a safe and efficient manner for each of the two withdrawal sequences and j determined the effect of rod motion on reactor power at various operating conditions. The manner in which criticality is achieved is not changed by
. power rerate. The methods in place do not use 2 l
sequences. The current withdraw sequence is performed in accordance with Banked Position Withdraw Sequence. The rod patterns for intermediate power levels up to rerated power will be evaluated using a three dimensional simulator code. Performance of this test is not required, a
(
... E . s , !
/
lg m .
1 I f (
y' ~
u - 1 Limerick Generating Station f Unit 2 Rerate'Startup: Test Report :
Page 7 of 44 .'j PAG:mbc .;
6.1.3 Test 9 - Water Level Reference Leg Temperature- ll t < -,
, For LGS the= difference'in. length between the !
reference" legs and the' variable legs of. water i
~1evel instrumentation is very small,: making - ;
correction for the_small L increase in drywell j
. temperatures negligible, therefore;this. test:is" ;
- not required'to be repeated for power;rerate.
6.1.4' Test 10 - IRM Performance ,
I The purpose ofLthis test _was to adjust the 5 intermediate range monitors (IRMs) to obtain optimum overlap with the SRMs and average. power range monitors:(APRMs). Technical Specifications and plant procedures 1 ensure proper'IRM response during startup. This test does not need to be .
- repeated forlrerate.-
6.1.5 Test.13 - Process. Computer The purpose of this. test was to verify the .
performance of the process computer-under plant '
operating conditions. The process computer was fully tested at plant operating. conditions during the Initial ~ Startup Test Program. The functions of ,
the process computer are'not changed-due to power >l rerate so no additional testing is required. ]
l 6.1.6 Test 16 - Selected Process Temperatures. i This test established the minimum recirculation pump speed to maintain water temperature in the bottom head of the. reactor vessel within 145'F of reactor coolant saturation temperature'as determined by reactor pressure.'This test also..
provided assurance that the measured bottom head drain line thermocoupleLwas adequate to measure bottom head coolant temperature during normal- I operations. Temperature stratification limits are defined within Technical Specifications. This 1' testing is not required for power rerate.
6.1.7 Test 17 - System Expansion This. test verified that reactor drywell piping and-major equipment were unrestrained with regard to thermal expansion. Analysis was performed for rerate conditions with results showing that the piping-systems.are acceptable for power.rerate. No i further testing is required.
H i
r >D*?
(': ,
Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 Rerate Startup Test-Report Page-8 of 44 PAG:mbc-6.1.S' Test 20 Steam' Production:
.The objective of this' test was to operate-continuously at rated reactor conditions to demonstrate that the NSSS providedJsteam at a sufficient rate and quality. This was-the initial warranty run which is not applicable to. power
-rerate.'
6.1.9 Test 23 - Feedwater Test 23 had five objectives. The'first was to demonstrate reactor water level control. The-second was to evaluate and adjust feedwater controls. The third objective demonstrated the capability of automatic flow runback. feature to-prevent a low water level. scram fo11owing.a. single 1 feedwater pump trip. The. fourth-objective demonstrated adequate response to feedwater heater loss. The final objective demonstrated general.
reactor response to inlett subcooling changes.
These objectives ~were demonstrated 1through the performance of three different tests during-the initial startup. The tests that will'be performed as part of power rerate are included in Section.
6.2.12. The tests that are.not required for power. '
rerate are described below.
The. loss of feedwater heating. test demonstrates' adequate response to loss of feedwater heating.
This event is caused by isolation of the steam extraction line to the feedwater heater. During-this transient, the maximum feedwater temperature decrease is required to be i 100*F,'and the-resultant MCPR shall be greater than the fuel thermal safety limit. Analysis has'been performed' for rerate conditions assuming the maximum allowed feedwater temperature decrease of 100*F. The results showed~the thermal and mechanical overpowers for this event meet the' fuel! design criteria at rerate conditions.-Based on the rerate heat balance, a loss of feedwater heating would not' result in a greater than 100'F decrease in final feedwater temperature;'therefore,-this test-is not required to be performed for power.rerate,
~ _ . _ _
jdL ' , .
4:
s L'
Limerick ~ Generating Station 1 Unit'2 Rerate Startup Test Report
.Page.9 of.44 PAG:mbc h V 6.1.9. : TEST 23 - Feedwater-(Continued);
i The feedwater' pump trip' test demonstrates'the ,
capability:of the automatic core: flow runback' y' feature to. prevent' low water level scram following-the trip of one:feedwater-pump. One feedwater. pump
~is tripped and the automatic recirculation runback:
circuit acts.to drop power.within the-capacity of:-
u the remaining feedpumps. This-has'already been.
demonstrated at Limerick at MELLLA conditions from full l power on Unit 1. Data from this evolution 1 was reviewed and it has been determined that.
p" adequate' margin exists for rarate conditions.
G.E. has evaluated'one feedwater. pump trip and determined that it will not cause'a reactor scram with the recirculation runback pump speed set at 42%. Therefore, this teat will not be reperformed.
6.1.10- ~ Test 25 - Main Steam Isolation valves Test 25 had three objectives. The first,was to L functionally check the MSIVsifor proper operation at selected power levels. The second objective '
determined the reactor. transient behavior during and'fo11owing simultaneous full closure of all MSIVs. The third was to determine the isolation valve closure times. Large transient testing' performed.at high power'during the Initial:Startup demonstrated the-adequacy for protection for'these large transients. Analysis has shown that for these transients at-rerate-conditions the change in unit performance-is small,.thus' testing the unit's response to-full closure of the MSIVs at.
rerate power level is not required. MSIV functional checks will be performed. See Section 6.2.13 for details.
6.1.11 Test 26 - Main Steam Relief Valves-This test verified proper operation-of the dual-purpose relief / safety valves including determination of their capacity and verification of their leaktightness following operation. The valve capacity is not.affected by rerate. The setpoints for these valves are being increased for rerate. The new setpoints will be set and tested.
This test does not need to be performed for~ power rerate.- j u
a L
Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 Rerate Startup Test Report Page 10 of 44 PAG:mbc l l
6.1.12 Test 27 - Turbine Trip and Generator Load Rejection Demonstration i This test demonstrated the response of the reactor and its control systems to protective trips in the l turbine and generator. Large transient testing performed at high power during the Initial Startup :
demonstrated the adequacy for protection for these. 1 large transients. Analysis has shown that for these transients at rerate conditions the change i in unit performance'is small, thus testing the ,
unit's response to turbine and generator trips at !
rerate conditions is not required.
6.1.13 Test 28 - Shutdown From Outside the Control Room l l
This test demonstrated the ability to shut down I the reactor from normal steady state operating ;
conditions to the point where cooldown is !
initiated and under control with reactor pressure' l and water level contro11ed'from outside the ;
control room. Power rerate does not change the l capability of the reactor to be shut down from l outside the control room; therefore, a repeat of this test is not required. l 6.1.14 Test - 30 Recirculation System The first objective of this testing was to i determine the transient responses and steady state conditions following recirculation pump trips and to obtain jet pump performance data. The second objective was to calibrate the jet pump flow instrumentation. The recirculation system calibration was performed as Startup Test #35 which will be performed as part of rerate testing (see Section 6.4.2).
6.1.14 Test - 30 Recirculation System (Continued)
Test 30 determined the transient response during recirculation pump trips, flow coastdown, and pump restarts. Power rerate does not affect the ability of the recirculation system to respond acceptably to these transients as demonstrated during the initial Startup Test Program so no further testing is required, t
Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 Rerate Startup Test Report Page 11 of 44 i PAG:mbc !
6.1.15 Test 31 - Loss of Turbine-Generator and Off-Site Power l The objectives of this test were to demonstrate proper performance of the reactor and the plant j electrical equipment and systems and to verify that safety systems initiate _and function properly without manual assistance during the loss of auxiliary power transient. Power rerate will not change the ability of the electrical systems to function properly during a loss of main turbine-generator and offsite power. The ability of HPCI and RCIC to function properly at rerate conditions ,
will be demonstrated (see Sections 6.2.7 and 1 6.2.8) during the power ascension to rerate conditions; therefore, this test is not required.
6.1.16 Test 33 - Piping Steady-State Vibration Measurements This test determined the vibration characteristics ,
of reactor internals and recirculation loops I induced by hot two-phase forces. Analysis ,
performed shows that the net impact from power 1 rerate is small and considered negligible. This !
test is not required to be repeated for power i rerate.
6.1.17 Test 34 - Offgas System Performance Verification The purpose of this test during initial startup was to demonstrate that the offgas System operates i I
within Technical Specifications. Power Rerate has I been determined to be a minimal impact on this system and therefore no additional testing outside of normal Technical Specifications is required. 1 6.1.18 Test 36 - Piping Dynamic Transient The objective of the original test was to show 1 that piping vibrations in.the Main Steam Inside !
Containment, Reactor Recirculation and various )
other systems were acceptable during selected ,
dynamic transients. The small increase in initial power level from power rerate will not significantly change the response of this piping to dynamic transients, thus this test is not required for power rerate.
f Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 Rerate Startup Test-Report Page 12 of 44 PAG:mbc
'6.2. ' UFSAR Chapter 14.2 Tests Recomunended For Power Rerate 6.2.1 Test 1 - Chemical and Radiochemical'
Purpose:
The primary objective'of this test is to maintain control and knowledge about the quality i of the reactor coolant chemistry.
Description:
Chemical and radiochemical samples will be taken in accordance with plant procedures at the original 100 % power level and at the rerate 100% power level.
Level 1 Criteria Per ST-5-041-800-2 and ST-5-041-885-2 Level 2 Criteria None Results:
Rerate Chemistry Results PARAMETER ACTUAL DATA ACTUAL DATA ACCEPTANCE (95%) (100%) CRITERIA Primary Rx Coolant 1.26 x 10~3 1. 8 6 x 10-3 10.2 uCi/gm Iodine ,
1 Primary Rx Coolant 0.134 0.117 51.0 j Conductivity Primary Rx Coolant 6.82 6.87 25.6 to 58.6 Ph Primary RX Coolant 0.24 0.29 5200 l Chloride j ST-5-041-800-2 and ST-5-041-855-2 Reactor Coolant Chemistry and Dose Equivalent Iodine -131 respectively were both performed satisfactorily at 95 and 100% rerated power. All acceptance criteria were satisfied.
6.2.2 Test 2 - Radiation Measurements
Purpose:
This test measures radiation levels at selected locations and power conditions to assure the protection of plant personnel and continuous compliance with guideline standards of 10CFR20 during plant operation. I
b f.*
Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 Rerate Startup Test Report Page 13 of 44 PAG:mbc 6.2.2 Test 2 , Radiation Measurements (Continued)
Description:
Radiation levels will be measured at various locations in the plant at rerated power levels of 90% and 100% in accordance with GP-2 App. 6.
Level 1 Criteria Radiation doses of plant origin and occupancy.
times of personnel in radiation zones shall be controlled consistent with the guidelines of the standards for protection against radiation outlined in 10CFR20 NRC General Design Criteria.
Level 2 Criteria None Results: Radiation Surveys were conducted at rerated power levels of 90 and 100% in accordance-with GP-2 Appendix 6, Normal Plant Startup -
Health Physics. Essentially, the dose rates are the same as those experienced at the original power levels. No postings were changed as a result of achieving the rerate 100% power level.
Radiation dose rates remain within the standards for protection against radiation outlined in 10CFR20 NRC General Design Criteria thus meeting the test criteria.
6.2.3 Test 4 - Full Core Shutdown Margin
Purpose:
This-test demonstrates that the reactor will be subcritical throughout the fuel cycle with any single control rod fully withdrawn.
Description:
Shutdown margin demonstrations shall be performed in accordance with ST-6-107-875-2 Shutdown Margin Determination.
Level 1 Criteria Shutdown margin is 20.38% (delta K)/K + R. l I
l.
l t
Limerick Generating' Station Unit 2 Rerate Startup Test Report Page 14 of 44 l l
PAG:mbc' i 1
6.2.3 Test 4 -' Full Core Shutdown Margin (Continued)
Level 2 Criteria None Results: For Unit 2 Cycle 4, the required shutdown i margin must be greater than 0.38% (delta K)/K + R, I where R is equal to 0.26% (delta K)/K. Therefore, the calculated shutdown margin for Cycle 4 must be i greater than 0.640% (delta K)/K. j As Unit 2 reached criticality, data was collected to calculate Shutdown Margin in accordance with ST-6-107-875-2, Shutdown Margin Determination.
Cycle 4 shutdown margin was determined to be 1.58% ,
(delta K)/K. This satisfies the Level 1 I Acceptance Criteria.
6.2.4 Test 5 - Control Rod Drives Purpose This testing demonstrates that the control rods meet Technical Specification requirements for scram times.
Description:
Scram timing of control rods shall be performed in accordance with ST-3-107-790-2, CRD Scram Timing.
Level 1 Criteria Per ST-3-107-790-2 Level 2 Criteria None
> cp , b l
n; ,
l
, Limerick Generating Station :
Unit 2 Rerate.Startup Test Report Page 15 of 44
. PAG:mbc' ,
1 in 6.2.4 Test 5;- Control Rod Drives (Continued). .;
l Results: Scram Time Testing was performed for all- !
control rods during the' Operational Hydrostatic Test (Ops Hydro) at rerated pressure ~.- All Level 1 Acceptance Criteria:per ST-3-107-790-2, LCRD Scram Timing,.were satisfied and are shown below. j scram Timing Results' Test Position Inserted'from Acceptance Acceptance Results-Fully Withdrawn ' Criteria'l Criteria 2 (seconds) 45 0.43 0.45 0.299 i
39 0.86 0.92' O.588 I l
I 25 1.93 2.05 1.287 1 05 3.49 3.70 2.319 ~
i-
- Acceptance Criteria 1
- Avg. scram insertion ~ time
! from fully' withdrawn position for all control
- ' rods.
s i Acceptance Criteria 2: Avg. scram insertion time from fully withdrawn position.for the 3 fastest control rods in each group of'4 control rods in a 2 by 2 array.
j 6.2.5 Test 11 - LPRM Calibration Purpose The purpose of this test is to calibrate- )
the local power range monitors (LPRMs).
4
Description:
The LPRM channels will be calibrated
! to make the LPRM readings. proportional to the i neutron flux in the narrow-narrow water gap at the
, chamber elevation. This calibration will be j
' performed in accordance with ST-3-074-505-2, TIP ,
j.. Calibration of LPRMS.
Level 1 Criteria Per ST-3-074-505-2 I l' l Level 2 Criteria
}. None 3: u j.,
4 Eh ;
- c 1 . . ,
?
4 I
' Limerick GeneratingLStationi d
' Unit'2iRerate Startup Test ReportL t ~Page.16 of~44
> ' PAG:mbc> i 6.2'.5 Test 11;- LPRM Calibration (Continued)'
Results: Using-ST-3-074-505-2,LTIP Calibration of:'
oLPRMs,.all operable-LPRMs were'successfully Tcalibrated. LPRM Gain AdjustmentLFactor values. 'j for allzoperableLLPRM channels were greater than or equaltto 0.90'and:less than or equal to,1.10, as required. 'l 6.2.6 . Test 12 - APRM' Calibration' i i'
RPurposes The purpose of.this' test'is.to calibrate the average power range monitors (APRMs).
Descriptions Each APRM channel reading will.be. ~j adjusted to be consistent with the core thermal J
! power as determined from the heat balance. This )
calibration will be performed in accordance with i ST-6-107-887-2, APRM-Gain. Determination and j Adjustment. '
Level'1 Criteria APRMs are correctly set to calculated APRM-setting.
Level 2 Criteria ,j l
None q Results: APRM Calibrations or' Gain Adjustments :1 were performed during each Test Condition ~(1 '
through 6).during the Rerate Startup. Test Program. R Each performance of ST-6-107-887-2 APRM Gain-Determination and Adjustment, was. completed-satisfactorily. No problems were encountered j !
during these tests.
6.2.7 Test 14 - Reactor Core' Isolation Cooling' system
Purpose:
This testing will verify proper operation j of the Reactor Core Isolation'CoolingJ(RCIC) 1 System at the rarate operating pressure and provide baseline data forrfuture surveillance. I testing. Data obtained during the rated pressure r quick start test will be analyzed to verify the margin to trip on RCIC Turbine Speed following a quick start to satisfy SIL 377 commitment'.
... = .
rm ._c- '
n: unff?
, , d pWic < -y '
, j 4
.y '
.l ' '
'LimerickIGenerating-Station: '
H
' Unit.2 Rerate Startup: Test Report F; Page 17 of 444 PAG:mbc-p '6.2.7- Test:14 -iRCIC systemL(continued)'
DescriptionsLAt 150 psig,-as part of the. normal.
plant'startup,t ST-6-049-320-2,:RCIC @ rability.
Verification-(or;the appropriate Special Procedure)',.will'be performed to. demonstrate.
p -
adequate control of the turbine'and rated; flow capability.
}
Usingthe;currentcontrollersettings,aks condensate storage tank (CST) injection L performed at 2 920 psig.to demonstrate acceptable:
~
1 '
operation at the lower-end of the operating pressure range for power rerate and to provide a L benchmark'to which-future surveillance tests'are compared. This demonstration will be performed o using.ST-6-049-230-2, RCIC Pump,: Valve and FlowJ Test" (or the appropriate Special Procedure). A1 E stability check of the RCIC system will be performed.in accordance with station procedures or.
~
the appropriate-Special Procedure.
At rerate operating pressure, accold quick' start is performed'in accordance with S49.1.D, RCIC System Full Flow Functional. Test (or'the
. appropriate Special Procedure). Following-the quick start, system stability shall be demonstrated;by introducing small step disturbances'in flow demand in accordance with' station procedures or the appropriate Special Procedure. As-part-of-the analysis'of the:RCIC -
quick start at rated conditions, the margin to. -
trip on RCIC turbine speed will be measured'to.
determine if the' recommended modification of SIL' 377 is needed.
Level 1 Criteria
- 1. .The system shall deliver rated. flow (600 gpm)'
in less than or equal to 30 seconds from the.
automatic initiation at any reactor pressure between 150 psig and rated. pressure at rerate '
conditions.
- 2. The RCIC turbine shall not trip-or isolate during auto or manual starts..
L r
1 i
e r + - ,w.'- , ,
r.-. s.e--,.,-.mw .m.. . , . , , , ,--,:.---,,,,,e , - - - , . - ,m. ., w g- y g., 4
y - .
) 4
% $.';g
- Y
,7.;p s my m s ,
a 6 o, .
9 , Limerick Generating Station
[4 , , LUnit 2.Rerate Startup. Test' Report Page;18 of 44-
[
f, PAG:mbc c
h ; NOTE : - If any; Level 1 criteria are notimet,7the)
W ' '
' reactor will only,be allowed to. operate 1
.up to a restricted powerilevelfdefined' )
by Figure 2 until.the-Level'11 criteria:
l .are met. Consult Technical H Lt Specifications 1for other actions to be p taken.;
!! Level 2 criteria' (J ,
l
- and subsequent speed peaks >shall not be more '
than 5% faster than rated RCIC-turbine speed.
- 2. .
The. speed and flow control" loops shall twF
' adjusted so that:the decay ~ ratio of any RCIC system related. variable is,notogreater:than.
0.25.
Results: At 150'psig, SP-146, Unit 2 RCIC Operability Verification for Power Rerate, was-performed satisfactorily. The purpose of this test was to: verify lRCIC Operability'at'150.psig-and verify time to rated flow falls within 30 seconds. Tech Spec minimum for rated flow is 600 gpm and actual was 680 gpm.- Time to rated flow was 24 seconds thus satisfying all criteria.
With reactor. pressure at approximately 940'psig, '
the RCIC Pump, Valve and Flow Test, ST-6-049-230-2, was performed satisfactorily. The RCIC turbine did not trip, greater than 600 gpm was achieved' with discharge pressure greater than,80 psig above reactor pressure in less than 30 seconds,'thus-satisfying all Level 1 acceptance criteria. All -
speed peaks were less than 4803.75 rpm satisfying the Level 2 criterion.
Section 7.3 of SP-146, Unit 2 RCIC' Operability Verification for Power Rerate, was-performed satisfactorily at 100%'Rerated Power Level.- A-cold quick start was performed and stability.was checked. .RCIC pump flow was 600 gpm at'a1 pressure ~
of 1220 psig and time to rated flow was 18 seconds with an initial speed spike of 2000 rpm. No tuning was needed and the system ran smoothly.
Decay ratios were zero. .All Level 1 and 2 acceptance criteria was satisfied.
_m- - . _ _ - - _ - - . _ _ - _ _ - _
y y Je [
.c TLimerick Generating Station Unit 2'Rerate Startup Test Report
.Page 19lof 44
-PAG:mbc
. 6.2.8- . Test 15'.- High Pressure Coolant Injection ~ System Ptryoset This. test will verify proper ~ operation.of
- e. the High Pressure Coolant: Injection (HPCI) System at the.rerate. operating pressure and provide.
baseline' data for future surveillance testing.
Description:
At 200 psig, as'part of'the normal
, plant startup, ST-1-055-800-2,- HPCILResponse. Time (or the appropriate Special Procedure), willibe
' performed to' demonstrate: adequate 7 control of the turbine and rated flow capability.
Using the current controller. settings, a condensate storage tank (CST) injection is-
~
performed at 920 psig to demonstrate acceptable operation at the lower end of the operating-pressure range for power rerate and to provide a-benchmark to which. future surveillance tests are.
compared. This demonstration will be performed using ST-6-055-230-2, HPCI Pump, Valve and Flow (or the appropriate Special Procedure)..A stability check of the HPCI system will be-performed in accordance with station. procedures or the appropriate Special Procedure..
At rerate operating pressure, a cold quick start is performed in accordance with S55.1.D, Full' Flow Functional Operating Procedure (or the appropriate Special Procedure). Following the quick start, system stability shall be demonstrated by introducing small step disturbances in flow demand in accordance with station procedures or the appropriate Special Procedure.
Level 1 Criteria
- 1. The system shall deliver rated flow (5600 gpm) in less than or equal to 30 seconds from the automatic initiation at any reactor pressure between 200 psig and rated pressure at rerate conditions.
- 2. The HPCI turbine shall not trip or isolate' during auto or manual starts, u
&& , ;[ < '
jf '
J
^
I . Limerick'GeneratingfStation ,
Unit'2 Rerate-Startup Test Reporti !
Page-20 of 44 1 i,(" PAG:mbc !
V L.
l '6.2.8. Test 15.- MPCI System (Continued) n , ,
Level 2 Criteria' '!
' 1.- To provide.an<overspeed and isolation trip avoidance margin, the? transient startofirst j
"^
speed ~ peak'shall'notibe within 15%-(of rated- 1 turbine. speed) of the.overspeed: trip, and .
subsequent; speed' peaks shall not<be:moreithan-5% faster than rated'HPCI turbine (speed." .
- 2. The~ speed and flow controlfloopseshall:be adjusted so that'the decay ratio of:any.HPCI. j system related variable is not greater than: u 0.25. 1 Results: At 200 psig, SP-145, Unit 2 HPCI operability Verification for Power Rerate, was -
performed satisfactorily. .The purpose of this- a test was to verify HPCI operability at 200 psig d and verify. time to rated flow falls within 29.5 seconds. Tech Spec minimum flow'is 5600 gpm-and-actual.was 5600 gpm.at.a discharge pressure of.410' psig. Turbine speed was 4000 rpm and the turbine.
did not1 trip.- Time to rated flow was 23.5. seconds j
thus satisfying all Level 1 and Level 2 criterion.
At 960 psig, ST-6-055-230-2, HPCI Pump, Valve and Flow, was completed satisfactorily. The following- .
acceptance criteria were met:
Rated Flow 5600 Actual 5600 gym Rated Pressure 1040 psig ' Actual 1300 psig /
Response Time 29.5 sec Actual 19 sec 't q
No speed requirements were exceeded. The^ speed .
and flow control loops did'not need any' adjustment Li and decay' ratio was less than 0.25 thus satisfying ;)
all test criterion. u SP-145, Unit 2 HPCI Operability Verification for ,
Power Rerate, was performed satisfactorily at 100%- '
Rerated Power. A cold quick start was performed' in' conjunction with a stability (tuning) check.- R No turbine trip or isolation were received and the following test acceptance criteria was met:
Rated Flow 5600 Actual 5600 Rated Pressure 1040 Actual 1150 :
Decay Ratio 1 25 Actual 1 25 g Response Time $29.5 sec Actual 27.5 sec a.
~ '
m[m U g" jdw?
,;R
- 1 ,
?
~~. ~ ~ ~
I : y l
I '. h t e) ; er-4 .
h 1 > <
4
. f.
. ' Limerick Generating Station
, Unit <2 ReratelStartup Test Report i
- PageL21'of:44 PAG:mbc 7-g <
6.2.S i Test?15 -!NPCI System (Continued) ' '
j The transient start peak speedLdid.not. exceed the; j
' limit:of 4609 rpm.and subsequent" peaks. ware;1ess_ '
,e ,
- than.maximumfallowable 4400 rpm. :All.LevelL1 and: l J'a.
- a; 2 acceptance' criteria were: met.; o 6;2.9'- . Test L18 L TIP LUncertainty' Purposes.This. test! confirms.the' reproducibility ofc ]
the traversing incore-probe system (TIPS)' . .
readings, determines the. core power-distribution in three dimensions, and determines core' symmetry. ,
Description:
This test-is performed in accordance with.RT-3-074-850-0, Core' Power. Symmetry and TIP. '
Reproducibility.
Level l' Criteria None :
- i Level 2 Criteria
.. R Per RT-3-074-850-0 Results <RT-3-074-850-0, Core Power' Symmetry and TIP Reproducibility, was performed satisfactorily at full power. Reactor Power distribution data was collected by. repeatedly traversing the. core, axially with gamma tips. This' data was collected and forwarded to the Fuel and Services Division for analysis. The results are below:
Random Noise Geometric Total-Tip' l Comoonent (%) Comnonent (%) Uncertainty (%) j 0.58% 0.96% . 1.12% .
.I Thus the requirement of total tip uncertainty;to j be 57.1% was satisfied.
6.2.10 Test 19 - Core Performance
Purpose:
This test evaluates the core performance parameters.to assure plant thermal limits are maintained'during the ascension to rerate.
conditions.
Description:
As power is increased along a constant rod pattern line,. core thermal power will be measured near 90% rerated power and at each 3%
increment up to 100% rerate power, using the current plant methods of monitoring reactor power.
l
< ft.jf+" '
4 , ,
((
h US ' '
Limerick Generating Statio'n l L ,' ,'
Unit-2;Rerate;Startup. Test' Report i l n 'Page 22 of 44'
, PAG:mbc- .,
.l 6.2.10 Test 19 Core Performance (Continued)
L Demonstration of. fuel. thermal margin will'be .
L + performed prior to and during power' ascension at l each 3% increment up to the rerated power'1evel.-
R Fuel thermal margin will be projected to thornext F test point to show expected' acceptable margin, and' ,
1 p . will be satisfactorily confirmed.by;the-4 measurements taken at each test point before
] . advancing to the next increment.
r 1 This demonstration and'on going monitoring of core i and fuel conditions will be performed in .
accordance~with ST-6-107-885-2, Thermal LimitsL(or the appropriate Special1 Procedure).
Level 1 Criteria rhe following thermal limits are 5 1.000:
- 1. CMFLPD (Core Maximum Fraction of' Limiting Power Density) . . . ..
- 2. - CMFCP (Core Maximum Fraction of Critical ~
Power)'
- 3. CMAPR (Core-Maximum Average Planar' Ratio)
Level 2 Criteria None j Results: While thermal limits are continuously h monitored during power ascension-ST-6-107-885-2, 1 '
Thermal Limits, was performed at each test condition satisfactorily thus meeting all acceptance criteria.
Rerate Power Level' Thermal Limit 89% 95% 98% 100%' .i MFLCPR .824 .870 . 862 .907 MFLPD' .773 .879 . 888 .910 MAPRAT .804 .900 . 883 .908 1
l w w w w -ev,, e,m - . - , - - - + , , - e y ,,g,.-s, m y 4rm~ -,+ g-~ w
m- .
O Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 Rerate Startup Test Report Page 23 of 44 PAG:mbc 6.2.11 Test 22 - Pressure Regulator Purpose This test has three objectives.
- 1. To confirm the adequacy of the settings for the pressure control loop by analysis of the transients induced in the reactor pressure control system by means of the pressure regulators.
- 2. To demonstrate the backup capability of the pressure regulators via simulated failure of-the controlling pressure regulator.
- 3. To demonstrate that other affected parameters are within acceptable limits during pressure induced transient maneuvers.
Description:
During TC-1 and TC-2, the following step inputs will be made to the pressure l regulator:
i
! 1. -3 psi
- 2. +3 psi
- 3. -5 psi
! 4. +5 psi
- 5. -10 psi
- 6. +10 psi When this testing is complete for one pressure regulator, transfer is made to the other pressure regulator, and the steps shall be repeated.
Transfer back to the original pressure regulator is accomplished through simulated failure of the controlling pressure regulator. Transfer between pressure regulators by normal transfer and by simulated failure demonstrate that these events are survivable and well-behaved.
Average main steam line flow versus pressure regulator output is taken in increments of 2%
power during the power ascension to 100% rerate power. The variation in the slope of the curve plotted on linear graph paper must show that the ;
incremental regulation is within the criteria. If ;
> the requirements are not met, the control valve l' function generator break points will have to be
, adjusted.
f
.O Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 Rerate Startup Test Report Page 24 of 44 PAG:mbc 6.2.11 Test 22 - Pressure Regulator (Continued) l Level 1 Criteria The transient response of any pressure control system related variable to any test input must not diverge.
l Level 2 Criteria
- 1. Pressure control system related variables may contain oscillatory modes of response. In ..
these cases, the decay ratio for each controlled mode of response must be less than or equal to 0.25. (This criterion does not apply to tests involving simulated failure of one regulator with the backup regulator taking over.)
- 2. The pressure response time from initiation of pressure setpoint change to the turbine inlet pressure peak shall be s 10 seconds.
- 3. Pressure control system deadband, delay, etc., shall be small enough that steady state limit cycles (if any) shall produce steam flow variations no larger than +0.5% of rated steam flow.
- 4. The peak neutron flux and/or peak vessel pressure shall remain below the scram settings by 7.5% and 10 psi respectively for all pressure regulator transients.
- 5. The variation in incremental regulation (ratio of the maximum to the minimum value of the quantity, control / incremental change in steam" incremental change in pre signal ,
flow", for each flow range) shall meet the '
following:
% of Steam Flow Obtained With Valves Wide Open Variation 0 to 85% 1 4:1 85% to 97% 1 2:1 85% to 99% 1 5:1
- 6. Turbine control valves 1, 2, and 3 must be full open when the fourth valve is about 10%
open and has full control of reactor pressure.
y Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 Rerate Startup Test Report-Page 25 of 44 j PAG:mbc 6.2.11 Test 22 - Pressure Regulator (Continued)
Results: Pressure regulator stability testing was performed at rerate power levels of 30% and 95%.
The data obtained during iach test condition is summarized below. The system response to all size step changes at each power levol was excellent.
There were no signs of divergence or oscillations.
Decay ratios were zero for all step changes.
Pressure response time and margins to scram setpoints were satisfactory in all cases. No limit cycles were observed. All Level 1 and Level 2 acceptance criteria were satisfied.
"A" PRESSURE REGULATOR STEP CHANGE DATA Peak Pressure Peak Steady Power Ste Step Pressure Response Power State Level (+/ p) Size (psig) Time (sec) (%) Cycles.
3 2.5 ,
968 3 31 0 30% 5 5 968 5 33 0 10 7.5 971 5 33 0 3 3.75 1031 3 95 0 95% 5 6.25 1031 4 98 0 10 10 1033 5 99 0 "B" PRESSURE REGULATOR STEP CHANGE DATA Peak Pressure Peak Steady Power Step Step Pressure Response Power State Level (+/-) Size (psig) Time (sec) (%) Cycles 3 2.5 968.5 4 31 0 30% 5 3.8 968 4 33 0 10 7.5 971 4 34 0 3 2.75 1031 3 97 0 95% 5 5 1031 4 98 0 10 10 1033 4 99 0
=
.y Q'
Limerick. Generating Station Unit 2 Rerate Startup Test. Report Page 26 of 44 PAG:mbc 6.2.11 Test 22 - Pressure Regulator (Continued).
Pressure Regulator failovers were performed at rerate power levels of 30% and 95%. The data obtained is summarized below. In all cases,-the backup pressure regulator took control when the i controlling regulator was failed. All acceptance criteria were satisfied.
Pressure Regulator A PRESSURE REGULATOR FAILOVER DATA Peak Pressure Peak Steady Power Step Pressure Response Power State Level Size (psig) Time (sec) (%) Cycles 30% 12 980 2.5 43 0 95% 16 1044 5.0 99 0 Pressure Regulator B PRESSURE REGULATOR FAILOVER DATA Peak Pressure Peak Steady Power Step Pressure Response Power State Level Size (psig) Time (sec) (%) Cycles 30% 12 979 2 44 0 95% 16 1043 5.5 99 0 Pressure Regulator Incremental Regulation Determination, SP-142, was performed in 2% power increments from main generator synchronization to full power. This data was used to calculate the pressure regulator incremented regulation. All test criteria were satisfied and are summarized below. Turbine control valves 1, 2, and 3 were full open when the fourth valve was approximately 10% open and had full control of reactor pressure.
Steam Flow Incremental Regulation Variation Level 2 Range Max / Min Criteria Maximum Minimum 0% to 85% 1.64 0.66 2.48 54:1 85% to 97% 0.81 0.42 1.93 52:1 85% to 99% 0.81 0.42 1.93 15:1 l
., C(o ' '
a; ,
kNm ' l , ,
.4 :+ <
. Limerick.GeneratingIStation- ,
Unit:2 Rerate Startup~ Test Report t;= Page 27 off44-u ~ PAG:mbc "6.2.12 Test 23 -!Feedwater Systest
- Purpose To verify that the'.feedwater system has been' adjusted to provide acceptable reactor water
. level' control at.rerated conditions.-
' Descriptions Reactor water level setpointTchanges.
of approximately:3.to 6 inches will be~used to; evaluate and acceptably adjust,cif necessary,:the-feedwater control system settings for power and feedwater pump. modes-tested. Theflevel'setpoint changes will be performed in accordance with the
. appropriate special Procedure.
Level setpoint changes shall be performed at three (3) power levels: 854,.95%, and 98%.
Total feedwater. flow and Master level controller output datatis taken in 3% to 5%' increments'to 100% rerate power. The variation in the slope of the curve plotted on linear graph paper;(feedwater controller output versus total.feedwater flow) must show that the incremental' regulation is within the criteria.
Level 1 Criteria The transient response of any level control system related variable to.any test input shall not diverge.
Level 2 Criteria
- 1. Level control system related variables may contain oscillatory modes of response. sin these cases, the decay ratio for each controlled mode of response shall be less than or equal to 0.25.
- 2. At steady state generation for the'3/1 element systems, the input scaling to the mismatch gain shall be adjusted such that level error due to biased mismatch gain' output shall be within 1 inch.
- 3. The variation in incremental regulation (feedwater flow demand change divided by actual feedwater flow change for small' disturbances) does not exceed a factor of 2
, _ to 1 between feedwater flow demand and feedwater flow.
i
7-e no Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 Rerate Startup Test Report Page'28 of 44 PAG:mbc 6.2.12 Test 23 - Feedwater System-(Continued)
- 4. The turbine speed regulation variation between the three.feedpumps must match within i 6% of rated speed.
Results: Feedwater Stability Testing was performed at rerated power levels of 86, 95, and 98%. Two inch and.five inch positive and negative level setpoint changes were input and system. response was monitored. These step changes were performed in both single element and three element control.
System response was not oscillatory and showed no signs of divergence. No system adjustments were required. All acceptance criteria related to system stability was satisfied.
Speed regulation tests were performed during the 2R03 outage on all three reactor feed pumps.- The results are tabulated below and the turbine speed regulation variation between the three feed pumps matched within 16% of rated speed.
I RT-1-006-331-2 RT-1-006-332-2 RT-1-006-333-2 OR Equivalent OR Equivalent OR Equivalent RFPT A RFPT B RFPT C RFPT
% 5.9 5.6 6.1
! RPM /In. 128 120.5 133.2 r
The level error between single and three element I level control was verified following the stability testing at 86, 95 and 98% power levels. The level never changed by more than 1 inch on each transfer. All test acceptance criteria was satisfactory.
Feedwater controller output and feedwater flow data was collected approximately every 3-5% power L during power ascension in accordance with SP-144, Feedwater Incremental Regulation Determination.
Data was taken and plotted for both 2 pump and 3 pump configurations and the variation in incremental regulation was 52:1 for both conditions.
L~ , L*
s
-Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 Rerate.Startup Test Report Page 29 of 44 PAG:mbc 6.2.13 Test 24 - Main Turbine Valves Surveillance Test
! Purpose This test determines the highest power l level at which surveillance testing can be h performed on the Turbine Stop and Control valves without causing a reactor scram.
Description:
Individual main turbine' valves are tested routinely during plant operation as L
required for turbine surveillance testing. Turbine Stop and Control Valves shall be individually .
stroked at various power levels in accordance with the appropriate Special procedure to determine the highest power at which the normal surveillance testing can be performed.
Level 1 Criteria None Level 2 Criteria
- 1. Peak neutron flux must be at least 7.5% below the scram trip setting.
- 2. Peak vessel pressure must remain at least 10 psi below the high pressure scram setting.
- 3. Peak steam flow in each line must remain 10%
below the high flow isolation trip setting.
Results: In order to have data from which to extrapolate, Turbine Stop Valve testing was initially performed at 85% power. APRM peaks, Main Steam line flow peaks, and Reactor High Pressure peaks were collected, graphed, and extrapolated up at power levels of 85, 88, 90, 95 and 98%. The data evaluated at 98% resulted in performing the final test at 100% rerate power, however, at slightly lower pressure (approximately 1038 psig). Under these conditions, all test criteria were satisfied and future performances will be performed by adjusting pressure set to 960 psig at a nominal 100% power. Data is summarized below.
l
's '
'p 5 * -ii i l
C # Limerick Generating Station Unit 2eRerate Startup' Test Report Page 30 of 44 1
. PAG:mbcL i
- 6.2.13 Test'24 - Main Turbine Valves Surveillance Test (Continued)
Reactor High Pressure Peek Test Power Levels (X) 85 88 90 95 100-um
.l sv Test Reactor Pressure Peek (psig)- <
sv1 1024 1029 1032 1040 1047.5 Sv2 1026 1032 '1034 1043 '1049 s sv3 1025 1030 1033 1042 1048 sv4 1025 1030 1033 1042.5 1048 I
MsL Flow Peeks
]
,, MSL FLOW Peek (MLb/hr) ,l SV TEST Test Pwr MsL A' MsL 8 MsL C MSLN b
-i sv1 3.25 3.27 3.0 3.5
~
SV2 3.375 3.4 3.41 3.2 -
83 Sv3 3.0 3.33 3.33 3.33 l Sv4 3.30 3.0 3.38 3.41 svi - 3.4 3.4 3.08 3.66 Sv2 3.51 3.54 3.50 3.20 88 i sv3 3.08 3.50 3.48 3.58 .
sv4 3.45 3.16 3.5 3.58 SW1 3.45 3.5 3.2 3.75 sV2 3.58 3.625 3.58 3.25 90 .
Sv3 3.125 3.54 3.50 3.66 sv4 3.5 3.25 3.55 ~3.75 SW1 3.69 3.81 3.38 4.0
. SV2 3.8 3.9 3.8 3.5 95 sv3 3.4 3.9 3.7 3.9 sv4 - 3.8 3.35 3.83 4.0 sv1 3.9 4.025 3.52 4.15 Sv2 4.05 4.18 4.0 '3.65 100 sv3 3.55 4.05 3.95 4.1 Sv4 4.0 3.63 4.0 4.15
.n , p-3; '
,7 < ;.v - ' -
3y7 l q.i . >
1 ' fi Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 Rerate Startup Test Report lc ,Page 31^of.44 HE PAG:mbc~
i: .
. . )
U 6.2.13 Test 24.- Main Turbine Valves Surveillance Test'
=(Continued): j
' Flux Peeks- !
APlut Peak'(X)
!_ ' SV TEST Test -A 8 'C D E F' L, Pwr 2
l .
h ' SV1 87 87 87 88' 87 87 86 86 - 87 ' - 85 ' 86
' '. SV2 87 -
85 sV3 86 - 87 87 88 87 88 -
SV4 - 86 87 87 ' 88 86 ^ 87 i SV1 ~ 88 87 88 88 87 88 sV2 90 88 89 90 88 89~
88 sV3' 90 88 89 90 89 89
. SV4 89 88 89 09 ' 88 89 svi 90 90 90 90 90 90 SV2 91 90 91 92 90 91 ,
90 '
sv3 92 90 92 92 90 92 SV4 90 90 90 91 90 91 SV1 97.7 98.6- 97.7 98.2 97.3 98.2 SV2 '97.7 98.2 98.2 98.2 98.8- 98.6 l
.i
'95 SV3 97.3 97.7 98.6 98.5' ' 98.5 98.5 SV4 98.2 98.6 99.5 98.7- 99.5 99 SV1 101.8 1 01.3 101.6 102 '101.2 101.2 - -- l l
SV2 1 01.8 1 01.4 101.4 101.8 100.9 101.8 100 SV3 101.8 100.9 101.1 101.8 100.5 100.5 l
sV4 102.7 102 102.7 102.7 101.8 102 ,
1 i
1 l
j l
l l
l l
l
'l ,
g y..nw-.,-- ,.g,-, , - , - . . ~ - , _ - , . . , ~ ,~
yy .
I
. Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 Rerate Startup Test Report Page 32.of 44 PAG:mbc 6.2.13 Test 24 - Main Turbine' Valves. surveillance Test (Continued) ;
l In order to have data from which to extrapolate,. I Turbine Control Valve testing was initially l performed at 85% power.- APRM peaks, Main Steam '
Line flow peaks, and Reactor High Pressure peaks were collected, graphed and extrapolated up at power levels of 85, 88, and 90% power. The ;
extrapolated values from 90% appeared marginal to l perform the enheduled 95% performance, therefore, i it was decided to try to run the next performance j at.92% power. The 92% power test run was aborted ;
after multiple Bypass Valves opened. A decision !
was made that this would not be acceptable on a !
monthly basis. Therefore, future performances of ;
the Turbine Control Valve test will be performed at 90% Rerate Power where all test criteria were i found acceptable. Data is summarized below. l l
Reactor High Pressure Peak ;
i Test Power Levels (%)
85 88 90 95 100 CV Test Reactor Pressure Peak (psig)
CV1 1022 1027 1032 !
CV2 1024 1027 1032 CV3 1023 1026 1032 CV4 1017 1022 1028 I
1
o Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 Rerate Startup Test Report Page 33 of 44 PAG:mbc 6.2.13 Test 24 - Main Turbine valves Surveillance Test (continued)
MSL Flow Peaks MSL FLOW Peel (MLb/hr)
CV TEST Test Pwr MSL A MSL 8 MSL C MSL D tv1 3.08 3.16 3.08 3.08 cv2 3.125 3.16 3.08 3.08 85 CV3 3.125 3.16 3.08 3.08 cv4 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 cv1 3.17 3.25 3.17 3.25 cv2 3.17 3.25 3.20 3.25 88 CV3 3.17 3.25 3.20 3.27 Cv4 3.08 3.125 3.08 3.13 CV1 3.41 3.50 3.42 3.50 cv2 3.45 3.50 3.40 3.50 90 cv3 3.41 3.50 3.40 3.50 cv4 3.3 3.4 2.25 3.4 cv1 _
CV2 95 CV3 Cv4 tv1 Cv2 100 rv3 cv4 l
l l
1 i
i
. . j S.
1 l
I Limerick Generating Station l Unit 2 Rerate Startup Test Report Page 34 of 44 PAG:mbc 6.2.13 Test 24 - Main Turbine Valves Surveillance Test (Continued)
Flux Peaks APRM Peak (%)
Test A 8 C D E F CV TEST Pwr CV1 87 87 88 68 87 88 CV2 87 87 87 88 87 87 CV3 87 87 87 88 87 88 cv4 85 85 85 85 85 85 CVi 88 87 88 88 87 88 CV2 88 87 87 88 87 88 CV3 88 87 87 88 87 87 CV4 88 87 87 88 87 88 CV1 95 94 95 95 95 95 CV2 95 95 95 95 95 95 CV3 95 95 95 95 95 95 tv4 91 90 90 90 90 90 CV1 CV2 CV3 Cv4 CV1 CV2 100 cv3 l
l tv4 l
l 6.2.14 Test 29 - Recirculation Flow Control Demonstration l
Purpose:
This test demonstrates the Recirculation system flow control capability of the plant for individual local manual control operation and determines that controllers are set for desired i system performance and stability.
Description:
When the plant is tested along the 100% rerate power load line, the recirculation system will be tested by inserting small positive and negative steps (1% to 5% speed changes) in local manual mode to check speed loop stability at
{
100% rerate power.
c
-vy,-
1 i
I Limerick Generating Station l Unit 2 Rerate Startup Test Report Page 35 of 44 ;
l PAG:mbc ;
J l 6.2.14 Test 29 - Recirculation Flow Control Demonstration j l (continued)
Level 1 Criteria
, The transient response of any recirculation system .
L related variable to any test input must not l
! diverge.
Level 2 Criteria 1
I 1. A scram shall not occur due to Recirculation l flow control maneuvers. !
l
- 2. The decay ratio of any oscillatory controlled )
I variable must be less than or equal to 0.25.
- 3. Steady state limit cycles (if any) shall not produce turbine steam flow variations greater than 0.5% of rated steam flow.
i Results: The Recirculation System Flow Control was l' tested in accordance with the Modification l Acceptance Test (MAT) 6090-2 for ARTS /MELLA. 1 l Since both tests were redundant in nature to l introducing step changes in Recirc flow, they were 1 combined. Two test conditions were established in the new operating domain of the Maximum Extended l Load Line Limit (MELLA). The Recirc system was I tested by introducing small positive and negative j step changes (1% and 5%) in local manual mode to check loop stability. The two test conditions were approximately 97% core thermal power /88.4 ,
mlb/hr core flow and 83% core thermal power /66 i mlb/hr core flow. Plant parameter responses to !
j the step changes were recorded and they were heavily damaged with no oscillations and no signs !
of divergence. All acceptance criteria were satisfied.
l l 6.2.15 Test 35 - Recirculation and Jet Pump j j Instrumentation calibration l
Purpose:
The purpose of this test is to. perform a l complete calibration of the installed recirculation' system flow instrumentation including specific signals to the plant process computer. ;
i i
c .1 c i#
, Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 Rerate Startup Test Report Page 36 of 44 PAG:mbc 6.2.15 Test 35 - Recirculation and Jet Pump Instrumentation Calibration (Continued)
Description:
At operating conditions which allow the recirculation system to operate at the speeds required for rated flow at 100% rerate power, the jet pump flow instrumentation will be adjusted to provide correct flow indication based on the jet pump flow. The total core flow signal to the process computer will be calibrated to accurately read the total core flow. This recalibration of the recirculation system shall be performed in accordance with ST-2-043-500-2, Recirculation System Flow Calibration.
- Level 1 Criteria Per ST-2-043-500-2 Level 2 Criteria None Results: Core flow calibration was performed per ST-2-043-500-2, Recirculation System Flow Calibration. Data was collected and core flow calculations were performed and the M-ratio converged to $1.0%. Jet Pump Flow Summer Amplifier gain adjustment factors were calculated and were between 0.99 and l'.01 meeting the acceptance criteria without needing adjustments.
In addition, the APRM/RBM flow unit gain adjustment factors were calculated and also did not need adjustment. All acceptance criteria were met.
6.2.16 Test 32 - Essential HVAC System Operation and Containment Hot Penetration Temperature Verification Purpose The purpose of this test as written for the Initial'Startup Test program was to verify the ability of the Drywell Atmosphere Cooling System to maintain design conditions in the drywell during operating conditions.
Description:
Drpell temperature is monitored to ensure design limits are not exceeded. There are
( no changes for rerate which will affect the air flow distribution inside the drywell. The calculated increase in drywell temperature resulting from rerate is 2*F. Drywell temperatures will be monitored in accordance with ST-6-107-590-2.
=
Limerick Generating Station Unit 2.Rerate Startup Test Report. -
Page 37 of 44 ,
PAG:mbc 6.2.16 Test 32 - Essential HVAC System Operation and Containment Hot Penetration Temperature verification (Continued)
Level 1 Criteria j Drywell temperature shall not exceed 135'F per Tech Spec 3.6.1.7.
Level 2 Criteria None Results: Drywell average air temperature is monitored per ST-6-107-590-2, Daily Log - Opcons 1, 2, 3. Drywell average air temperature remained s130 F thus meeting the acceptance criteria of ,
1135" F. l 6.2.17 Surveillance Testing i
Surveillance testing shall be performed on all l Tech Spec instrumentation requiring recalibration j due to power rerate changes (i.e. setpoint change, d range change, etc.). A Special Procedure will j contain signoffs for all the required surveillance j tests. Instrumentation required for monitoring )
during startup testing is addressed in Sections ;
7.2 and 7.3. i i
~Results: All Surveillance Testing required for I Tech Spec related instrumentation affected by i power rerate changes were completed .
.)
satisfactorily. A Special Procedure, SP-138, !
Surveillance Testing for Tech Spec Instrumentation, was written and performed to capture all of the applicable Surveillance Tests with the exception of the RBM Surveillance Tests which_were performed prior to exceeding 30% power. ,
6.2.18 Steady State Data Collection Steady state data of important plant parameters, as determined by the Performance and Reliability Group and Plant Engineering, suall be obtained following power rerate implementation at each incremental power increase between approximately 85.7% (90% original power) and 100% rerate power.
The data taken at power levels less than 100%
shall be extrapolated to predict conditions at 100% rerate power. This data collection shall be performed as a Special Procedure.
FL s 1JE . .
. w 6 9 *^ ' e
?.1 x ;
l: jg I
. M
' Limerick GeneratingLStation- l
' Unit 2.Rerate~Startup-Test Report. 'q Page;38 of 44. ;
PAG:mbc j 4
6.2.18- Steady State: Data Collection (Continued).
Results: Data was collected for 156~ plant 1 parameters at Test Conditions 12 through 6. For- i
~the most part the' data tracked very well.~'There
- were a few points that were generating. bad data' ,
and after investigation had Equipment Trouble? Tags '
(ETTs) filled out for'them. These points were not !
critical and were documented with discrepancy 4 forms in the governing data' collection procedure-SP-137, Steady' State Data Collection. ;
Extrapolations were made for various instruments .
recording' Turbine first stage pressure,; Total Reactor Steam flow, Reactor Feedwater temperatures and Turbine control valve positions. During1the )
startup EHC pressure' set was set at 960 psig, this ,
setting achieved'only 1038 psig in the Reactor.
,1 Vessel during the initial rise to 100% reactor power. Subsequently, pressure set was adjusted.to l approximately 967 psig in order.to achieve the. j 100% rated pressure of 1045 psig, l 1
6.2.19 Thermal Performance Steady state data on thermal performance (
parameters,cas determined by the Performance and l Reliability Group and Plant Engineering,'willLbe j obtained when the unit reaches original 100%- ;
power, 3293 MWt. The same data'shall be collected .
at steady state conditions at theLrerate power- '
l level.of 100%, 3458 MWt. ']
Results: The Therma'l Performance' data was collected per SP-135, Thermal Performance Data' !
collection and Baseline for Rerated Conditions. j This test-was designed to baselineLthe Thermal l Performance of Unit'2'at rerated conditions and to ,1 determine'the gross / net generator electrical l output; change which occurs as a. result of. j implementing power rerate. There is no acceptance !
criteria for this test. In an attempt to obtain ;
true delta data for power'rerate and not confuse )
changes due to. outage work (i.e., condenser.~ i cleaning) the test was'run at 3293 Mwth 1005;psig and again at 3458 Mwth 1045 psig during the power ascension testing.
i
~ . _ . _ - __- -
- ;. 1
-.u..
Limerick Generating Station i Unit 2 Rerate Startup Test Report H Page 39 of 44 L PAG:mbc This concludes the LGS Unit
,1 2 Rera
.Startup Test Report. ,
Prepared By: MMM I
[' Rerate Start p Test Director l
Reviewed By:
M M gfer - Reactor 7 ngineering
,. Approved By: >
D' e or of ite Engineering 3 L
9 5
l j
1,
\
i l
l l
. . ~
i
e Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 Rerate Startup Test Report Page 40 of 44 PAG:mbc TABLE 1 - UFSAR Chapter 14.2 Tests UFSAR STP # Test Required for Rerate 1 Chemical and Radiochemical Yes 2 Radiation Measurements Yes 3 Fuel Loading No 4 Shutdown Margin Yes 5 Control Rod Drives Yes 6 SRM Performance No 9 Water Level Ref Temp No 10 IRM Performance No 11 LPRM Calibration Yes 12 APRM Calibration Yes 13 Process Computer (PMS) No 14 Reactor Core Isolation Cooling Yes 15 High Pressure Coolant Injection Yes 16 Selected Process Temps. No 17 System Expansion No 18 TIP Uncertainty Yes 19 Core Performance Yes 20 Steam Production No 22 Pressure Regulator Yes 23 Feedwater System Yes 24 Main Turbine Viv Surv. Test Yes 25 Main Steam Isolation Valves No 26 Main Steam Relief Valves No Turbine Trip and Generator Load No 27 Rejection Demo Shutdown From Outside the Main No 28 Control Room 29 Recirc Flow Control Demo Yes 30 Recirculation System No L ss f Turbine-Generator and No 31 Off-Site Power Essential HVAC Sys Oper and Hot No 32 Temp Verification Piping Steady-State Vibration No 33 Measurements Offgas Sys Performance No 34 verification 35 Recirculation Flow Cal Yes 36 Piping Dynamic Transient No 70 RWCU Perf. Verification No 71 RHR Perf. Verification No
q'
, .f * '--
y Limerick Generating Station' l Unit 2 Rerate Startup Test Report
['
Page 41 of 44 PAG:mbc TABLE 2 '
Test conditions TEST CONDITION RERATE POWER LEVEL 1 <85% I 2 85%-86% (Note 2) 3 90%-91%
4 95%-96% (Note 3) 5 97%-98%
6 99%-100% (Note 4) i NOTES: 1) Reactor core flow can be any flow within the safe j operating region of the power / flow map (Figure 1) that will produce the required power level.
- 2) Original 90% power is equal to 85.7% rerate power.
- 3) Original 100% power is equal to 95.23% rerate power. .
1
- 4) 100% rerate power is equal to 3458 MWt. I I
l H
i
., , - o
' s Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 Rerate Startup Test Report Page 42 of 44 PAG:mbc TABLE 3 - Tests to be Performed for Power Rorate Test condition STP # Test Description 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 Chemical & Radiochemical X X 2 Radiation Measurements X X 4 Shutdown Margin X 5 CRD Scram Timing X 11 LPRM Calibration X 12 APRM Calibration X X X X X X 14 RCIC (150#) X 14 RCIC (2 920#) X 14 RCIC Stability (Rerated X Pressure) 14 RCIC Cold Quick Start X 15 HPCI (200#) X 15 HPCI (2 920#) X 15 HPCI Stability (Rerated X Pressure) 15 HPCI Cold Quick Start X 18 TIP Uncertainty X 19 Core Performance X X X X j 22- Pressure Regulator' X X 23 Feedwater Level Control 1 X X X j 24 Turbine Stop Valve ST X X X X 24 Turbine Control Valve ST X X X X 29 Recirc. Flow Control 2 X 35 Recirc. System Flow X Calibration N/A Thermal Performance Test X X N/A I&C Surveillance Tests3 X N/A Steady State Data X. X X X X Collection N/A ARTS /MELLLA MAT 6090-2 X i - Level setpoint changes wiLL be performed three times, once each at approximate rerate power levels of 86%, 95%, and 98%.
2- kgative speed steps only at TC 6 (100% power).
3- These are to be performed prior to the plant condition for which the instrument is required to be operable.
4- Pressure Regulator stability checks wiLL be performed at approximate rerste power levels of 30% and 95%.
'. ,. e
- s. .
t Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 Rerate Startup Test Report Page 43 of 44 PAG:mbc FIGuitE 1 peraterover/FlowMap 4
130 ' - 130 n,,er / rio, points 120 - ,,.-------- - 120 ImmtP -
l 110 - 31@PSOOP j 7"gM QG~ -110 100 1: 100rnoSP i 23m05P
,e v
,#)j' ,. '
'O
-100 f- / ,- - 90
, 90
/ 1 80 / / . NainalN - 80 l 3
/ / Region *
##p l
i 70 - 0 66Wd.+ 68% ,--J / - 70
/
aimuner Itadadam Rads = Increased ~
60 - c.66Wo + 555 " IiM** N -
- ----- i = >= la-a= Flow
,g 50 - t,s.a ,o,-m==ody
.g
. 40 - 7,o pu, , *
)
- speed (20%) - 30 '
30 - g NatwalCirchy Cavitauon Interlock - 20 20 -
- 10 l 10 - . 1 0 l 0
0 l'0 20 50 40 $0 N 7'O N N N N M Nous: P . RemedDennalPowe #
COREFLOW (%)
(100% Rweend Poww = 3458 MWO ** Nominal j P = Mhor Cws Nw j i
(100% Com Nw = 100A M3th)
I I
i I
l j
t 7
i Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 Rerate Startup Test Report
.Page 44 of 44 PAG:mbc FIGURE 2 RCIC Acceptance Criteria Curves for Capacity and Actuation i
300 =
G W
vs
- P UNSAFE ioO SAFE UP TO LIMITED POWT.R i i l 1 0 23 90 M 100 RATED POWER f4) 1W ==
$ sm 8 .0 -
9 ==
s 1
l 9 I i 0 N M M N RATED PO%'ER (%)