ML021610202

From kanterella
Revision as of 14:05, 26 March 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Final Q/A Related Forms
ML021610202
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 05/31/2002
From: Bissett P
NRC/RGN-I/DRS/OSB
To: Conte R
NRC/RGN-I/DRS/OSB
References
05000219/2002-301 05000219/2002-301
Download: ML021610202 (15)
v • d • e


Text

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201 -1 Facility: 6y "i5'"'*' ' Date of Examination:

  • t.' - Z Examinations Developed by: F *acility/

NRC (circle one) _

Target Chief Date* Task Description / Reference Examiner's Initials

-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.l.a; C.2.a & b)

-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.l.d; C.2.e)

-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security & other requirements (C.2.c)

-120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d)

[-90] [5. Reference material due (C.l.e; C.3.c)] 4,A/9

-75 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due (C.1 .e & f; C.3.d)

-70 7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)

-45 8. Proposed examinations, supporting documentation, and reference materials due (C.1 .e, f, g & h; C.3.d)

-30 9. Preliminary license applications due (C.1 .1; C.2.g; ES-202)

-14 10. Final license applications due and assignment sheet prepared (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202)

-#4 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f)

-14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1 .j; C.2.f & h; C.3.g)

-7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)

-7 14. Final applications reviewed; assignment sheet updated; waiver letters sent (C.2.g, ES-204)

15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with

-7 facility licensee and authorization granted to give written exams (if applicable) (C.3.k)

-7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)

  • Target dates are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter.

They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[] Applies only to examinations prepared by the NRC.

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 22 of 24

ES-201 Examination Outline Form ES-201-2 Quality Checklist Facility: O* &'.d, s,,. -,.%4%'sCeVAX. & '*'. Date of Examination: 13 Task Description Initials Item a b" ct I

1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model per ES-401. Vý /

W V IV R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all KI/A categories are appropriately sampled.

T V i

c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasiz es any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. V N d. Assess whether thejustifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate.
2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, and major transients.

S I b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and M mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity; ensure each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)',

and scenarios will not be repeated over successive days.

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
3. a. Verify that:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks, W (2) no more than 30% of the test material is repeated from the last NRC examination,

/ (3)° no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and /,_

T (4) no more than 80% of any operating test is taken directly from the licensee's exam banks.

b. Verify that:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the safety function groupings as specified in ES-301, (2) one task is conducted in a low-power or shutdown condition, (3) 40% of the tasks require the applicant to implement an alternate path procedure, (4) one in-plant task tests the applicant's response to an emergency or abnormal condition, and (5) the in-plant walk-through requires the applicant to enter the RCA.

c. V erify that the required administrative topics are covered, with emphasis on performance based activities. I Vý-'
d. Determine ifthere are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on successive days.
4. a. Assess whether appropriate plant-specific priorities (including exam section. PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the "I v G

E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

N E c. Ensure that K/A importance ratinqs (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

R A d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

Printme I Signature Date

a. Author V",. V, qz
b. Facility Reviewer (C) , 'y-U*'L-,. J .,.
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#1) - i -* z
d. NRC Supervisor -. 12 2(,. &1-Note: Not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column 'c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

23 of 24 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: OYSZ C(2tLVi.. Date of Examination: 3-S "j°Z L Operatinq Test Number:

Initials

1. GENERAI CRITERIA a b" c#

I

a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).
b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered  !,

during this examination. 4:

C. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section D.l.a). i " I.

d. Overlap with the written examination and between operating test categories is within acceptable limits. _-X2
e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.
2. WAXK -TI RO UG H (CATEG 0 RY Al II) CRITERIA .. .. ..
a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures

  • reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation ifdeemed to be time critical by the facility licensee
  • specific performance criteria that include: A A

- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature

- system response and other examiner cues

- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant

- criteria for successful completion of the task

- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps f apolicaoie

b. The prescripted questions in Category A are predominantly open reference and meet the
  • 41.4 criteria in Attachment 1 of ES-301V
c. Repetition from operating tests used during the previous licensing examination is within acceptable limits (30% for the walk-through) and do not compromise test intearitv
d. At least 20 percent of the JPMs on each test are new or sionificantly modified.
3. SIM UIt ATO R (CATEG 0 RY C) CRITERIA
a. The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

Printed Name / Signature Date

a. Author _____"_"__ _ _ _ _ 2.-
b. Facility ReviewerC) (1)'? 7* . i 3- 21O
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) P --C/-/ /0/
d. NRC Supervisor .,-s *IS Qc,.,g..

C'\ , / , . "

NOTE:

  • The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

H Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

23 of 26 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: oys-wL CpiLV,( Date of Exam: 1S149 ZQ07. Scenario Numbers: tI/Z131/' Operating Test No.: t 4 UAl ITATIV E ATTRII 0 TES Initials a W cl I

1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of 04 service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. A7
2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. M
3. Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)
4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario Ma without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.
5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. H
6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are given.
8. The simulator modeling is not altered. PUP
9. The scenarios have been validated. Any open simulator performance deficiencies have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.4 of ES-301.
11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit /

the form along with the simulator scenarios).

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

TARG ET QUANTITATIV E ATTRIB UTES (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTI0 N D.4.D) Actual Attributes ..

1. Total malfunctions (5-8) 1/6",1 1i6
2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1.2) 0%7
3. Abnormal events (2-4) - 1i 12I V 17
4. Major transients (1-2) *,1/ 1 K,
5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) / .

1./,2

6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) //1 1 0/.t. ,
7. Critical tasks (2-3) ___________.

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 24 of 26

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: S'oC)V I Applican t Evolu t

[ype I ypeion llinifum Numoer .,z Scenario

. Number e:

_____________ ___ 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 , MIA,'i`4A 1'/A Normal 1 4 4 RO Istrument 4 Component Major 1 1 _

Reactivity 1 e I 01j q Normal 0 I I As RO Instrument 1 2 At-Component -1 ___,_ 1 Major 1 - 5" SRO-I Reactivity 0 Normal 1 I As SRO Instrument/ 2 2)l/3 Component I Major 1 " ,

Reactivity 0 'JA Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument / 2 Componenti Major I

  • I Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicn's*n competence

_ -- count toward the minimum requirement.

Author: N....... Revi NRC Reviewer: . . . ..... .

I 25 of 26 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: CrZO# Z...

rype Applicant Ev.lu t ion l'linifum umperNum120er Scenario Number al

__ __ _ _ _ 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 I, t) NIP i I/,

Normal 1 RO Instrument I 4 I Component 7j., ,

Major 1 I Reactivity 1 j "-

Normal 0 -

I I As RO Instrument 2 Component 2:3. -7'15 5"'

/, 3_/,'

(

I Major SRO-I Reactivity 0 14)4 1-11A, Normal 1 1 As SRO Instrument I 2 I .

Component I 2Ai1 major 11 **

Reactivity 0 ___ __ I Normal 1 SRO-U Istrument I 2 mponent Major 1 _ _ _______

Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal condi ions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requiremenT.

Author: r: ----- _,-_- **.**-.*/*/-*.*

NRC Reviewe I 25 of 26 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement I

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: sabM3.

Al~lican t Evplution nir Scenario Number Type urne umer * ,~

1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 'IVA 'I/A t4A1 'IA Normal 1

.O RO Irstrument /4 ComponentI , .

Major 1 4 I Reactivity 1 -3 __ __

Normal 0 1 As RO Ist ru m en t 2 I Component .317) E 2,q~t ,

Major 1

  • SRO-I Reactivity 0 'jA" 4/fA Normal 1 4 4 AsSRO Instrument/ 2 - -

Component I , - ,_._

Major 1 _ o Reactivity 0 _14)4 4A 01A_

Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument/

Component 2

I Major 1 1 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C'2.a of Appendix D.

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicatntfs competence count toward the minimum requiremenL Author:

NRC Reviewer: --

I 25 of 26 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.:

Applicant

- ype Ev.lution I ype Mninimum Numge r ao- Scenario j&C Number u,.

V 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 'j/A NI/A '/

Normal 1 .,,

RO Irjstrument4 Component 11

_ Major 1I __ J Reactivity 1 01 -

Normal 0 i i As RO 2

Component 1 ,"/

Major SRO-I Reactivity 0 --- jl, PIA Normal 1 I As SRO Instrument/ 2 2),0/'

Component _,______I3, Major 1 _ ,_

Reactivity 0 4J N/A _

Normal 1 -4 SRO-U lnstrument / 2I CoMponent Major 1 * *,

  • Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirement.

Author:

NRC Reviewe r : _ - - - - - -

I 25 of 26 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: so.o*,S Applicant t ion EvfplupNum hnirnum

['pyp e er v~o Scenario

a~o Number o

__ __ _ 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 NI__,AN/A Normal 1

" RO ~~Component IrIstrument__ 4 414 !I Major 1 Reactivity 1 Li N/AA Normal 0 As RO Istrument Component 3,-7*, 22 3 .,5,/

Major 1" 5 i G SRO-I Reactivity 0 " -I Normal 1 As SRO Instrument! 2 Component Major 1 2,43*

_ It I Reactivity 0 *J" t ji*

Normal 1 SRO-U I~strument omponentI 22_ _

Major 1 1 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant' ompetence count toward the minimum requirement.

Author:

NRC Reviewer: I 25 of 26 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: .SOD "1 Ap;licant

"-tyyp e Ev.lution p %inihum umoer 0 Scenario o* U Numbers ap*.

__ __ _ _ _ 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 PI'N  ! f, 4/A t"/Ai NO RO Normal /4 Instrument Component 1 ~ 4 Major 1 4 , _

Reactivity 1 0 3 _ *A Normal 0 1 -4.

As RO Instrument/ 2 Component 3/

3,7I,b 2*%

2,4,/ _

I Major 1" 51 5 -

SRO-I Reactivity 0 e/I,14' Normal 1 1 As SRO Instrument I 2 ,

Component , _

,Major 1 '4 t Reactivity 0 ) AirJn*

Normal 1 4-SRO-U Instrument /

component 2

I Major 1 , , , _

Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant' rnpe t ence count toward the minimum requirement.

Author: --------- _X--_ --__-- - _ _-d_ ..-- . ,_ -_

NRC Reviewe I 25 of 26 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: SŽo_1o"V 1

Aplicant Evolution rni Scenario Number

'Type I ype Numoer sa ep,' QL0 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 t1/SA- ts/A fIA A/A Normal 1 RO Istrument 4 Component/' I Major 1, T Reactivity 1 lt, Normal 0 I I As RO Irastrument 2 21. 2 Component 3A!

  • i . 3,5',7 Major 1 1_ 5 Ic SRO-I Reactivity 0 . ', ,

Normal 1 I As SRO Instrument 2 2)6/

Component _,___,_._

Major 1 - __

Reactivity 0 0 )0- tj )A1 Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument / 2 Component Major 1_ ,, _ _

Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be include ; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirement.

Author:

NRC Reviewe I 25 of 26 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: .5W 448 Aplican t Evplution ry'pe I ype %ininPum Numoemr oUo Scenario Sao' Number 1 2 3 40 Reactivity 1 01ai4 ' If NI/A Normal 1 j1 I RO IrIstrument 4 Component Major 1 _ 4 Reactivity 1 L M/

I As RO Normal Irstrument /2 Component 0

3,-, b 4, 2/

I Major 1 (o SRO-I Reactivity 0 I 1A Normal 1 As SRO Instrument / 2 ,,,

Component -:1-Major 1 5" 4, Reactivity 0

  • 14/c, Normal 1 SRO-U strument Component 2 I

Major _ _

Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's conlpetence count toward the minimum requirement.

Author: /;irh ___- z__ . .

NRC Reviewer: . _ I 25 of 26 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 ikr,3 ceOvfogm-, jzc*ci ý'-'-k or i~e 3 G43,;&4c Appicant'#1,t,-7 Ap nt # 2,5,b ROESR_*.SRO-U RO R* SRO-U ROSRO-I.*SRO-U Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Understand and Interpret z,3, LA ýS 2, 2-

2. 4- , T" Z13 Annunciators and Alarms - .57 Diagnose Events 23 2 2,6 3)5, 5 and Conditions -7 Understand Plant  ?'2% 3,41 4)y 2,6 5,% 3,4, -3*, 3), 3 -L4) and System Response .1 (V .711-,7 7, t g," >7 Comply With and 1-8 i 9,,3, I3, %6 Use Procedures (1) (,-:1 (,,7 Operate Control b07 t, Z)) 1)5" Z,1, W/

Boards (2) ___________ (o, O __ @73 8 Communicate and j-5 1-"9 J-1 2A,-.J 1-7 1-7 2. i Interact With the Crew -r -. 10, -- _

Demonstrate Supervisory - ,.* l " - , "/. J-(3)

Ability Comply With and 7 jt4 JA q 'A N/AZ Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author: _.2'I-Ot NRC Reviewer: .e4/_ _ - I NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 26 of 26

ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-7 Quality Checklist Facility: ( -*-r*q. Ce-tL(,. Date of Exam: 13MA -?--QZ Exam Level: RSR Initial Item Description a b" ct

1. Questions and answers technically accurate and applcable to facility j J:L
2. a. NRC K/As referenced for all questions

.b. Facility learning objectives referenced as available

3. RO/SRO overlap is no more than 75 percent, and SRO questions are appropriate * / i'A per Section D.2.d of ES-401
4. Question selection and duplication from the last two NRC licensing exams appears consistent with a systematic sampling process
5. Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

V the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or

__ the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or

_ _ the examinations were developed independently; or

. the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or

. other (explain)

6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent from the bank at least 10 percent new, and the rest modified); enter the actual question Bank Modified New V% V k

distribution at right 9

7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on Memory C/A the exam (including 10 new questions) are written at the comprehension/analysis level; enter the actual question distribution at riqht "
8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers
9. Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are 'V assigned; deviations are justified
10. Question psychometric quality and format r-'- ES, Appendix B,guidelines .!I--
11. 7-.: cxam contains 100, one-point, multiple choice items; the total is corre:; and * (14' agrees with value on cover sheet r.ntedd Name /Signature Date
a. Author
b. Facility Reviewer ()- ,/ -6 _*_.*__ - - - _ *._"l,
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) - 2
d. NRC Regional Supervisor ----f __ -- ,-,___ --*_ _ _.--

-, - f Note: The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

I Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 42 of 46

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist

, 0,10, NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML021610202&oldid=2701476"