ML031110250

From kanterella
Revision as of 20:34, 25 March 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
E-mail from D. Nelson to S. Long, Regarding Meeting Summary Concerning Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Leakage Expectations
ML031110250
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 04/26/2002
From: David Nelson
NRC/OE
To: Long S
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
FOIA/PA-2003-0018
Download: ML031110250 (3)


Text

Steven Long - FWd. for meeting summary Page 1 From: David Nelson (HQ-OE)

To: Steven Long J-k#

Date: 4/26/02 8:05AM

Subject:

Fwd for meeting summary Steve - attached is my request to include in the late November meeting summary the info pertaining to my question about current leaks and the licensee's response. Based on the overall lack of detail in the actual meeting summary that was eventually docketed, I'm not surprised this detail wasn't included Dave

ISteven.Long -for meeting summary Page1l From: David Nelson (HQ-OE)

To: Stephen Sands - God Date: 12/5/01 3 44PM

Subject:

for meeting summary Stephen, please insert somewhere in the meeting summary the following, or words to this effect:

In it's presentation, the licensee presented information regarding the number of expected leaking CRDM nozzles that may have existed in refueling outages 10, 11, and 12 and which may be found in the uncoming outage commencing on February 16, 2002, based on various Weibull leak initiation models.

Despite these predictions, the licensee stated that it does not believe any leaks actually exist at this time.

CC: Jacob Zimmerman

~Steveni~ Long - Fwd: for meeting summary Page 1 From: Steven Long > ,t,.

To: Allen Hiser Date: 4/26/02 9:59AM c

Subject:

Fwd for meeting summary (

Allen, More, but contradictory info about Davis Besse CRDM nozzle leakage expectations.

Steve