(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
|
---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML23128A1612023-05-0808 May 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1, and Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit No. 1 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing ML23086B9862023-03-27027 March 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - Davis-Besse, Unit No. 1 - Acceptance Review Results for Davis-Besse, Unit No. 1 - Proposed Alternative Request RP-5 ML23033A0322023-02-0101 February 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information for Davis-Besse's 2022 Steam Generator Inspection Report (L-2022-LRO-0115) ML22266A1102022-09-23023 September 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1 - Request for Additional Information Regarding July 21, 2022, Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure ML22164A8572022-06-13013 June 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1 - Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Revise the Emergency Plan ML22118A6862022-04-28028 April 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1 - Request for Additional Information Regarding Alternative to Extend the Steam Generator Weld Inspection Interval ML22112A1092022-04-22022 April 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1 - Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Revise the Design Basis for the Shield Building ML22090A1692022-03-30030 March 2022 Re_ Action Tracking Item 2022 SST - 335 - Tom Gurdziel, E-mail Re_ Event Number 55734 at Davis Besse, a Matter of Interpretation ML22080A2512022-03-18018 March 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) ASME OM Code Case OMN-27, Alternative Requirements for Testing Category a Valves (Non- Piv/Civ) ML22055B0382022-02-24024 February 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1 - Upcoming Steam Generator Tube Inservice Inspection ML22055A0872022-02-23023 February 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1 - Request for Additional Information Regarding Relief Request RP-3 ML22045A4962022-02-14014 February 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1 - Acceptance of License Amendment Request to Revise the Emergency Plan ML22040A1832022-02-0707 February 2022 LTR-22-0033 Tom Gurdziel, E-mail Event Number 55734 at Davis Besse, a Matter of Interpretation ML22034A9472022-02-0303 February 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1 - Revised Review Estimates for Proposed Alternative to Extend the Steam Generator Weld Inspection Interval ML22033A0632022-02-0101 February 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1 - Acceptance of License Amendment Request to Revise the Design Basis for the Shield Building Containment Structure ML21321A3782021-11-16016 November 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - Energy Harbor Fleet, Beaver Valley Units 1 and 2 and DAVIS-BESSEL Unit 1 - Acceptance of License Amendment Request Adoption of TSTF-554 EPID-L-2021-LLA-0193 ML21321A3792021-11-16016 November 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1 - Request for Additional Information Regarding Alternative to Extend the Steam Generator Weld Inspection Interval ML21287A0382021-10-14014 October 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1 - Acceptance of Requests for Relief from Certain Inservice Testing Requirements ML21271A1332021-09-28028 September 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1 - Acceptance of Proposed Alternative RR-A2 for Certain Steam Generator Weld Inspections ML21119A2152021-04-28028 April 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - Energy Harbor Fleet, Beaver Valley Units 1 and 2 and DAVIS-BESSE Unit 1 - Acceptance of Relief Request Proposed Alternative to Use ASME OM Code Case OMN-27 ML21041A5452021-02-10010 February 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1 - Request for Additional Information Regarding Steam Generator Tube Inspection Reports ML21007A3732021-01-0707 January 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) (External) Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Incorporate the Applicable Standard Technical Specification 5.2.2, Unit Staff, ML21004A1442020-12-30030 December 2020 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Incorporate the Applicable Standard Technical Specification 5.2.2, Unit Staff ML20329A3832020-11-24024 November 2020 NRR E-mail Capture - Davis Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1 - Request for an Exemption from the 2020 Force-on-Force Exercises ML20304A2842020-10-29029 October 2020 50.59 Inspection 2nd Request for Information ML20289A0992020-10-0505 October 2020 NRR E-mail Capture - Energy Harbor Fleet, Results of Acceptance Review Request to Use Provision in Later Edition of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI, EPID-l-2020-LLR-0132 ML20281A3692020-10-0505 October 2020 Energy Harbor Fleet, Results of Acceptance Review Request to Use Provision in Later Edition of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI, EPID-l-2020-LLR-0132 ML20239A7942020-08-25025 August 2020 NRR E-mail Capture - Energy Harbor Fleet, Beaver Valley Units 1 and 2 and DAVIS-BESSEL Unit 1 - Acceptance of License Amendment Request Incorporation of Applicable Standard in TS 5.2.2.e ML20203M3712020-07-21021 July 2020 Ultimate Heat Sink Request for Information Part 1 ML20203M3722020-07-21021 July 2020 Ultimate Heat Sink Request for Information Part 1 and Part 2 L-20-183, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Adoption of TSTF-425, Revision 3, Relocate Surveillance Frequencies to Licensee Control - Risk Informed Technical Specification Task Force2020-06-23023 June 2020 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Adoption of TSTF-425, Revision 3, Relocate Surveillance Frequencies to Licensee Control - Risk Informed Technical Specification Task Force ML20154K7642020-06-0202 June 2020 NRR E-mail Capture - Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1 - Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-425 ML20127H8672020-05-0606 May 2020 NRR E-mail Capture - Beaver Valley, Davis-Besse, and Perry - Request for Additional Information Regarding Request for Exemptions from Part 73 Security Requalification Requirements ML20058D3152020-02-27027 February 2020 Completion of License Transfer for the Beaver Valley, Davis-Besse and Perry Nuclear Units ML20024E0092020-01-23023 January 2020 NRR E-mail Capture - FENOC License Transfer - January 23, 2020 Call Summary ML20021A3162020-01-21021 January 2020 NRR E-mail Capture - Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station - Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Revise Containment Leakage Rate Testing ML19346B3972019-12-11011 December 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1 - Acceptance of License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-425 ML19273A1132019-09-27027 September 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station - Acceptance of License Amendment Request to Extend Containment Leakage Rate Test Interval ML19179A1382019-06-28028 June 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Davis-Besse - Request for Additional Information Regarding the Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program ML19164A1532019-06-13013 June 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station - Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Post-Shutdown Emergency Plan ML19162A3922019-06-11011 June 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station - Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Permanently Defueled Technical Specifications ML19161A2132019-06-0606 June 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Results of Acceptance Review - FENOC Fleet - Request for Approval of Request for Approval of Lrradiated Fuel Management Plans, EPID L-2019-LRO-0016 ML19149A6202019-05-29029 May 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1 - Request for Approval of the Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program ML19130A2082019-05-0808 May 2019 Email - NRC Email to FEMA Dated May 8, 2019: NRC Response to Comment on FEMA Review of Proposed Changes to DBNPS Emergency Plan for Permanently Defueled Condition ML19106A2512019-04-16016 April 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Davis-Besse - Proposed License Condition and Draft Safety Evaluation for the License Amendment Request to Adopt NFPA 805 ML19073A1112019-03-14014 March 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Davis-Besse - Acceptance of License Amendment Request for Permanently Defueled License and Technical Specifications ML19043A6962019-02-0808 February 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Davis-Besse License Amendment Request for the Post-Shutdown Emergency Plan ML18320A1272018-11-16016 November 2018 NRR E-mail Capture - Davis-Besse LAR to Change TS Definitions and Administrative Controls for Permanently Defueled Conditions ML18282A1482018-10-0909 October 2018 NRR E-mail Capture - Results of Acceptance Review - FENOC Fleet - Request for Exemption Related to the Suspension of Security Measures in an Emergency or During Severe Weather, EPID L-2018-LLL-0016 ML18282A2422018-10-0808 October 2018 OEDO-18-00160, FENOC Fleet, 2.206 Petition, Submission of Supplement Dated October 8, 2018, from the Petitioners - PRB and Petitioners (Elpc), Includes Email, Cover Letter from Elpc, and the Attachments to the Email 2023-05-08
[Table view] |
Text
70rreli Roberts - Davis Besse Restart Quest-ions' Darrell Roberts Davis BesseRestart Questions
- Page 1.
From: "Jim Riccio" <jim.riccio@wdc.greenpeace.org>
To: <djrQnrc.gov> 9 j% b r AfL.
Date: 7/31/03 1:50PM
Subject:
Davis Besse Restart Questions Darrell, Thanks for returning my call to Sam and for taking the time to answer my questions concerning the proposed denial of Congressman Kucinich's 2.206 petition. It was unclear to me whether the NRC would allow Davis Besse to restart prior to addressing the design basis issues that were supposed to have been resolved back in the 1990's. As I mentioned in our telephone conversation, the nuclear industry's lack of fidelity to the design and licensing basis has been of particular concern to me. I believe it undermines NRC's attempts to move to risk based regulation and has the potential to blind the industry and the agency to issues that contribute greatly to core damage probability. Since Davis Besse, has over its history, been unable or unwilling to ensure the adequacy of its design and licensing basis, I believe it is appropriate that the NRC not allow the reactor to restart unless and until the design basis deficiencies identified in the 1990s are resolved.
I've excerpted below the section of the inspection report that identified the fact that Davis Besse had failed to live up to their commitments contained in the 50.54(f) letter.
February 26, 2003
SUBJECT:
DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION NRC SPECIAL INSPECTION - SYSTEM HEALTH ASSURANCE - REPORTS NO. 50-346/02-13(DRS) and 50-346/02-14(DRS)
Page 12 The project, though a commitment to NRC in response to the 10 CFR 50.54.f letter, was delayed about two years due to engineering resource considerations. The licensee, on recognizing that station resources would remain a restraint, elected to contract for the reports. Two engineering organizations were contracted to prepare the validation reports and work on the project was commenced. From all of the systems validated, there were slightly more than 1000 identified deficiencies. These were characterized as either high, medium, or low significance and work was initiated to correct them.
At the close of this inspection, approximately 200 deficiencies had not been corrected. The inspectors reviewed the deficiency tracking list and open item log sheets for the service water and found where the resolution of an issue assigned a high significance rating was inadequate. The issue concerned rated flow in the service water system description that didn't include all possible flows. The prescribed resolution for this deficiency was that it was to be corrected in the system description. It failed to recognize that the analyses related to rated service water flow or using rated service water flow needed to be examined. This deficiency was noted by both the LIR team and the NRC team inspection. As corrective action, the licensee plans to:
- establish an event time line of identified deficiencies and opportunities to improve design information availability and adequacy;
- identify why the DBDVP was not completed;
- confirm that the DBDVP discovery phase was adequate; and
- evaluate why the DBDVP and other, prior programs and activities did not A resolve `
11Roberts - Davis Besse Restart Questions Page 4Darreu RobertsDaviBesseRestart.
QeIons . - - PaI 2II the identified discrepancies.
Sam denied the petition based upon the System health reviews. However as you can see below those reviews identified the fact that DB had not complied with the 50.54(f) letter. That there were 200 outstanding items and that when they reviewed an issue of high safety significance that had supposedly been addressed it was inadequate.
Sam claims in his denial of the Kucinich petition that:
Where deficiencies are identified by the licensee, they are entered into the licensee's formal corrective action program and prioritized based on safety significance. Safety-significant deficiencies identified by the NRC are being added to the NRC's Restart Checklist, and they must be resolved before the NRC will consider any future restart. Additionally, some issues that are identified by the licensee may also be added to the NRC Restart Checklist, depending on the safety significance of the issues. Some items of low safety-significance would not be required to be completed before a plant restart, but would be required to be captured within FENOC's corrective action program.
I am attempting to understand whether the NRC is requiring that all the 1000 deficiencies identified in 1997 will be corrected prior to restart or merely those deficiencies that the NRC deems to be safety significant. I've been trying to find anywhere in ADAMS where these 1000 deficiencies are identified and where the four bullet points are addressed but have thus far been unsuccessful.
Thanks again for returning my call and for attempting to clarify the NRC's position on Davis Besse restart.
Sincerely, Jim Jim Riccio Greenpeace 702 H Street NW #300 Washington, DC 20001 202-319-2487 202-462-4507