|
---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML23341A2002023-12-0707 December 2023 Email - Indian Point Energy Center Generating Units 1, 2, and 3 Implementation Notice of Amendment No. 67, 300 and 276 to Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Emergency Plan (Ioep) ML23332A0802023-11-0808 November 2023 Email from State of New York on the Revised License Amendment for Indian Point Energy Center ISFSI Only Emergency Plan ML23325A1632023-11-0808 November 2023 State of New York Comments on the Revised License Amendment for Indian Point Unit 2 and 3 Technical Specification Changes Reflecting Permanent Removal of Spent Fuel ML23331A9542023-11-0808 November 2023 Email - State of New York Comments on the Revised License Amendment for Indian Point Unit 2 and 3 Technical Specification Changes Reflecting Permanent Removal of Spent Fuel ML23144A3452023-05-25025 May 2023 Adam Kahn of Monsey, New York Email Against Treated Water Release from Indian Point Site ML23144A3442023-05-25025 May 2023 Peggy Kurtz of Rockland County, New York Email Against Treated Water Release from Indian Point Site ML23144A3392023-05-25025 May 2023 David Morris of New City, New York Email Against Treated Water Release from Indian Point Site ML23144A3502023-05-25025 May 2023 Dan Kwilecki of Montebello, New York Email Against Treated Water Release from Indian Point Site ML23144A3422023-05-25025 May 2023 Peter Duda of Pearl River, New York Email Against Treated Water Release from Indian Point Site ML23144A3382023-05-25025 May 2023 Dawn Giambalvo of Jersey City, New Jersey Email Against Treated Water Release from Indian Point Site ML23136B1622023-05-15015 May 2023 Town of North Salem, County of Westchester, New York Board Resolution Letter Regarding Treated Water Release from Indian Point Site ML23109A0632023-04-17017 April 2023 Email Acceptance Review for IP2 and IP3 Amended Facility License and Technical Specification to Reflect Permanent Removal of Spent Fuel from Spent Fuel Pits ML23055A1112023-02-23023 February 2023 Alyse Peterson Email- NYSERDA No Comments on Indian Point Unit 2 - Regarding Holtec License Amendment Request to Revise Permanently Defueled Technical Specifications and Staffing Requirements with Spent Fuel Transfer to ISFSI (Dockets 50-24 ML23049A0032023-02-14014 February 2023 NRC Acceptance Email to Holtec for License Amendment Request for Approval of New ISFSI-Only Emergency Plan and Associated EAL Scheme ML22313A1682022-11-0909 November 2022 NRC Response to Updates to the Proposed Amended IP2 Master Trust ML22308A0912022-11-0303 November 2022 Email Acknowledgement for IP2 and IP3 Amended Facility License and Technical Specification to Reflect Permanent Removal of Spent Fuel from Spent Fuel Pits ML22276A1642022-09-29029 September 2022 New York State Revised Draft EA Response E-Mail ML22271A8492022-09-28028 September 2022 E-Mail Transmitting Revised Indian Point Exemption Draft EA ML22269A3452022-09-22022 September 2022 Email Objection to Holtec IP2 Master Decommissioning Trust Agreement for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Facility Unit 1 and 2, EPID L-2022-LLA-0072 ML22259A1992022-09-0202 September 2022 Acceptance for License Amendment Request to Modify Staffing Requirements Following SFP Transfer to Dry Storage ML22265A0142022-08-31031 August 2022 Email Acknowledgement for Amended and Restated Holtec IP3 Master Decommissioning Trust Agreement for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Facility Unit 3 ML22242A2592022-08-19019 August 2022 E-mail from K. Sturzebecher, NRC, to B. Noval, HDI, Acknowledgement for Amended and Restated Holtec IP2 Master Decommissioning Trust Agreement for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Facility Unit 1 and 2 ML22228A1332022-08-0909 August 2022 Acknowledgement for License Amendment Request to Modify Staffing Requirements Following SFP Transfer to Dry Storage ML22215A0432022-08-0101 August 2022 E-Mail Transmitting NYS NSA Exemption Comments & Draft EA Review Completion ML22208A0292022-07-19019 July 2022 E-Mail Transmitting Indian Point Exemption Draft EA ML22168A0072022-06-16016 June 2022 Acceptance Review for License Amendment Request to Revise License Condition to Eliminate Cyber Security Plan Requirements ML22112A0102022-04-21021 April 2022 Acceptance Review: Request for Exemption from 10 CFR 50.54(w)(1) Concerning Indian Point Energy Center Onsite Property Damage Insurance ML22112A0122022-04-21021 April 2022 Acceptance Review: Request for Exemption from 10 CFR 140.11(a)(4) Concerning Primary and Secondary Liability Insurance for Indian Point Energy Center ML22103A2432022-04-13013 April 2022 E-mail - Request for Additional Information - License Amendment Request to Revise Emergency Plan and Emergency Action Level Scheme for Permanently Defueled Condition for Indian Point Energy Center ML22104A0342022-04-13013 April 2022 E-mail from Z. Cruz, NRC to J. Fleming, Holtec - Request for Additional Information Related to Request for Exemption from Portions of 10 CFR 50.47 and Part 50 Appendix E for Indian Point Energy Center ML22038A2572022-02-0707 February 2022 E-mail from Z. Cruz, NRC, to J. Fleming, HDI - Acceptance Review: License Amendment Request to Revise Emergency Plan and Emergency Action Level Scheme to Address Permanently Defueled Condition for Indian Point Energy Center ML22035A1862022-02-0404 February 2022 E-mail to J. Fleming, Holtec, from Z. Cruz Perez, NRC - Acceptance Review: Exemption Requests from Portions of 10 CFR 50.47 and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV for Indian Point Energy Center ML22028A1032022-01-28028 January 2022 E-mail Dated 1/28/2022, Transmittal of Draft Safety Evaluation for Proposed License Amendment Revision to Licensing Basis to Incorporate the Installation and Use of of New Auxiliary Lifting Device ML22038A1592022-01-24024 January 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) 2021 IPEC Annual Sturgeon Impingement Report ML22006A0442022-01-0505 January 2022 Email from Z Cruz to J Fleming Request for Additional Information - HDI Indian Point Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report ML21337A2952021-12-0303 December 2021 Subsequent Request for Additional Information License Amendment Request to Revise Licensing Basis for New Auxiliary Lifting Device (E-mail Dated 12/3/2021) ML21335A3692021-12-0101 December 2021 Acceptance Review: Indian Point Energy Center - Exemption Request from 10 CFR Part 20 App G Section Iii.E ML21266A2972021-08-18018 August 2021 8/18/2021 E-mail from H. Specter to R. Guzman Public Comments to NRC, Indian Point Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report Public Meeting on July 29, 2021 ML21225A6142021-08-0909 August 2021 Email from NRC to the Tuscarora Nation Announcing the IPEC PSDAR Public Meeting on August 18, 2021 ML21225A5682021-08-0909 August 2021 Email from NRC to the Stockbridge-Munsee Community Band of Mohican Indians Announcing the IPEC PSDAR Public Meeting on August 18, 2021 ML21225A5012021-08-0909 August 2021 Email from NRC to the Shinnecock Indian Nation Announcing the IPEC PSDAR Public Meeting on August 18, 2021 ML21224A3032021-08-0909 August 2021 Email from NRC to the Mashantucket Pequot Tribe of Connecticut Announcing the IPEC PSDAR Public Meeting on August 18, 2021 ML21225A4252021-08-0909 August 2021 Email from NRC to the Oneida Nation of Wisconsin Announcing the IPEC PSDAR Public Meeting on August 18, 2021 ML21225A3142021-08-0606 August 2021 Email from NRC to the Oneida Indian Nation Announcing the IPEC PSDAR Public Meeting on August 18, 2021 ML21225A4402021-08-0606 August 2021 Email from NRC to the Onondaga Nation of Wisconsin Announcing the IPEC PSDAR Meeting on August 18, 2021 ML21225A5462021-08-0606 August 2021 Email from NRC to the St. Regis Mohawk Tribe Announcing the IPEC PSDAR Public Meeting on August 18, 2021 ML21225A5352021-08-0606 August 2021 Email from NRC to the Tonawanda Band of Seneca Announcing the IPEC PSDAR Public Meeting on August 18, 2021 ML21266A2942021-07-25025 July 2021 E-mail from Paul Blanch to NRC (N. Sheehan, D. Screnci) Public Comments to NRC, Indian Point Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report Public Meeting, July 29, 2021 ML21197A2002021-07-16016 July 2021 (E-mail 7/16/2021) NRC Staff Assessment and RAI Closeout HDI Fleet Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program and Indian Point Energy Center Quality Assurance Program Manual ML21194A4082021-07-13013 July 2021 (7-13-2021) E-mail NRR Review Hour Estimate Change Supporting the Hi-Lift Crane Proposed License Amendment Request Review 2023-05-25
[Table view] Category:Environmental Monitoring Report
MONTHYEARML23132A1852023-05-12012 May 2023 2022 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report L-23-004, HDI Annual Occupational Radiation Exposure Data Reports - 20222023-04-24024 April 2023 HDI Annual Occupational Radiation Exposure Data Reports - 2022 ML22182A0762022-07-0101 July 2022 Resubmittal of the 2021 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report ML22123A2062022-05-0303 May 2022 2021 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report ML22118A4932022-04-28028 April 2022 2021 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report ML22109A1062022-04-19019 April 2022 2021 Annual Environmental Protection Plan Report ML21167A1882021-05-0606 May 2021 2020 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report NL-21-030, Submittal of 2020 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report2021-05-0606 May 2021 Submittal of 2020 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report ML21168A0242021-04-30030 April 2021 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report ML19252A2822019-08-28028 August 2019 Jones Day to NMFS, Sturgeon Monitoring Pursuant to Biological Opinion for Indian Point NL-19-039, Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report2019-04-23023 April 2019 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report NL-18-029, 2017 Annual Environmental Protection Plan Report2018-04-26026 April 2018 2017 Annual Environmental Protection Plan Report NL-17-066, Submittal of 2016 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report2017-05-15015 May 2017 Submittal of 2016 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report NL-17-047, Submittal of 2016 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report2017-04-26026 April 2017 Submittal of 2016 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report NL-16-058, Transmittal of 2015 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report2016-05-12012 May 2016 Transmittal of 2015 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report NL-16-043, Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for 20152016-04-28028 April 2016 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for 2015 NL-15-061, Submittal of 2014 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report2015-05-12012 May 2015 Submittal of 2014 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report NL-15-048, 2014 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report2015-04-28028 April 2015 2014 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report ML15114A0482015-04-0606 April 2015 Reply to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Renewal Application Environmental Review ML15114A0812015-04-0606 April 2015 2006 Year Class Report for the Hudson River Estuary Monitoring Program ML15114A0822015-04-0606 April 2015 2007 Year Class Report for the Hudson River Estuary Monitoring Program ML15114A0832015-04-0606 April 2015 2008 Year Class Report for the Hudson River Estuary Monitoring Program ML15114A0802015-04-0606 April 2015 2009 Year Class Report for the Hudson River Estuary Monitoring Program ML15114A0842015-04-0606 April 2015 2010 Year Class Report for the Hudson River Estuary Monitoring Program ML15114A0852015-04-0606 April 2015 2011 Year Class Report for the Hudson River Estuary Monitoring Program ML15091A0852015-04-0101 April 2015 Figures from Indian Point Quarter 3 2014 Groundwater Monitoring Report - Part 1 ML15091A0972015-04-0101 April 2015 Figures from Indian Point Quarter 3 2014 Groundwater Monitoring Report - Part 4 ML15091A0962015-04-0101 April 2015 Figures from Indian Point Quarter 3 2014 Groundwater Monitoring Report - Part 3 ML15091A0932015-04-0101 April 2015 Figures from Indian Point Quarter 3 2014 Groundwater Monitoring Report - Part 2 NL-14-039, Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report2014-04-28028 April 2014 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report ML14097A3262014-03-31031 March 2014 Coastal Zone Management Act Consistency Certification in Support of Renewal of Operating Licenses NL-13-027, Submittal of 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report2013-05-15015 May 2013 Submittal of 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report NL-13-026, 2012 Annual Environmental Protection Plan Report2013-04-18018 April 2013 2012 Annual Environmental Protection Plan Report ML13093A2612013-03-29029 March 2013 Draft Monitoring Plan Required by Reasonable and Prudent Measure #1 of the Final Biological Opinion for Continued Operation of Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 2 and 3 ML13157A1322012-12-31031 December 2012 Enclosure 1 to NL-13-028 - Radioactive Effluent Release Report: 2012 NL-12-009, Transmittal of 2011 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report2012-05-15015 May 2012 Transmittal of 2011 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report ML11249A0122011-08-26026 August 2011 Letter from P. Kurkul, NMFS, to D. Wrona, NRC, Draft Biological Opinion for License Renewal of Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 NL-11-068, Indian Point, Units 1, 2 and 3 - 2010 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report, Revision 12011-06-10010 June 2011 Indian Point, Units 1, 2 and 3 - 2010 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report, Revision 1 NL-11-038, Indian Point, Units 1, 2 and 3 - 2010 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report2011-05-16016 May 2011 Indian Point, Units 1, 2 and 3 - 2010 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report NL-11-039, 2010 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report2011-04-22022 April 2011 2010 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report ML11195A1612011-01-31031 January 2011 Final Report, 2010 Field Program & Modeling Analysis of the Cooling Water Discharge from Indian Point Energy Center. Appendices a to D ML11195A1602011-01-31031 January 2011 Final Report, 2010 Field Program & Modeling Analysis of the Cooling Water Discharge from Indian Point Energy Center. Appendix E to End ML11195A1582011-01-31031 January 2011 Final Report, 2010 Field Program & Modeling Analysis of the Cooling Water Discharge from Indian Point Energy Center. Cover Page to Page 51 ML11195A1592011-01-31031 January 2011 Final Report, 2010 Field Program & Modeling Analysis of the Cooling Water Discharge from Indian Point Energy Center. Page 52 to 119 NL-10-053, Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 20092010-05-13013 May 2010 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2009 NL-10-045, 2009 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report2010-04-29029 April 2010 2009 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report NL-10-045, Indian Point Units 1, 2 & 3 - 2009 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report2010-04-29029 April 2010 Indian Point Units 1, 2 & 3 - 2009 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report NL-10-044, Submittal of 2009 Annual Environmental Protection Plan Report2010-04-27027 April 2010 Submittal of 2009 Annual Environmental Protection Plan Report NL-09-061, Submittal of Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 20082009-05-14014 May 2009 Submittal of Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2008 NL-09-045, Indian Point, Units 1, 2, & 3, 2008 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report2009-04-17017 April 2009 Indian Point, Units 1, 2, & 3, 2008 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2023-05-12
[Table view] |
Text
~7--zL Unknown___.-_
From: Blizard, Andrea Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 11:44 AM To: di - IPECALL
Subject:
FW: Groundwater Investigation FAQ's imageOOL.gif FAQ rev 5.pdf Attached please find the latest version of FAQ's concerningthe groundwaterinvestigation at IPEC. Please share with personnel who do not have access to a computer.
Andrea Blizard Sr. Communications Specialist Indian Point Energy Center 914-271-7081 ablizar@ entergy.com hmnaWninftm=dwasdWM inar rr,,bx PvNift,Readom o1h*rfft*n AA awdn 4 AIDIA ,' e C - &
7 Page 1
.. S F-reqentls
? L ý LiviarEn 255b I
How was the groundwater contamination found at Indian Point?
A moist hairline settlement crack was found on the southwest wall of the IP2 spent fuel pool during the excavation work for the new gantry crane. Water collected from the crack was tested for radioactivity and was found positive for radionuclides characteristic of spent fuiel pool water. Once there was positive confirmation that radioactivity was leaking from the crack, Entergy began testing the existing wells on site for radioactivity. One monitoring well, MW-111, located in the IP2 transformer yard tested positive for tritium at elevated levels (-200,000 pCi/L). Other wells located near the discharge canal and in the IP3 turbine building showed small amounts of tritium, generally < 1000 pCi/L.
What is tritium?
Tritium is a radioactive isotope of hydrogen. It is formed in the upper atmosphere when cosmic rays strike Nitrogen in the air. It is also a byproduct of the fission process. Tritium is most commonly found as tritiated water. Tritium is produced commercially for use as a biological tracer and used in self-luminescent devices such as exit signs, aircraft dials and watch faces.
How is tritium measured?
Tritium in the environment is measured in units of picocuries per liter of water (pCi/L). A picocurie is 1 trillionth of a curie or about 2.2 disintegrations per minute.
Are there limits for how much tritium can be found in groundwater supplies?
There are standards esiablished by the Environmental Protection Agency for tritium and other radioactive contaminants in drinking water supplies. The standard for tritium is 20,000 pCi/L, which the EPA estimates equates to an annual dose of 4 mrem. The dose estimate assumes that all drinking water is obtained from the same supply.
Istritium the only radioactive isotope found in the groundwater?
No. Samples taken from three wells, one in the transformer yard and two on opposite sides of the discharge canal have tested positive for Strontium-90 and Nickel-63. (See map on page 3 for well locations)
In MW-11l, MW-36 and MW-37, we detected elevated levels of Strontium-90 ranging from 1.17 pCi/L to 22.7 pCi/L and Nickel-63 at about 40 pCi/L. The Nickel levels are preliminary.
Entergy is running confirmatory analyses to determine if these results are valid since Nickel-63 would not be expected to be found in these samples.
What isStrontium-90?
Strontium-90 is a by-product of the fission process in nuclear reactors. Large amounts of Strontium-90 were produced during the nuclear weapons tests conducted in the 1950's and 1960's that has resulted in levels of Strontium-90 being found dispersed worldwide. The New York State Department of Health reports environmental levels of Sr-90 in New York State between .7 and 1.3 pCi/L. The EPA drinking water standard is 8 pCi/L for Strontium-90.
Strontium-90 is a beta emitter with a half-life of about 29 years. It is chemically similar to calcium and tends to concentrate in the bones and teeth.
What is Nickel-63?
Nickel-63 is a radioactive isotope of nickel that is produced by neutron activation of metal components in nuclear reactors. Trace amounts of nickel-63 are present in the environment from radioactive fallout, but in much smaller amounts than Sr-90 or tritium. It is also a beta emitter with a half-life of 96 years.
Isgroundwater at Indian Point used for drinking water?
No. Drinking water supplies for the local communities and for Indian Point itself come from surface water reservoirs such as the Camp Field Reservoir in Peekskill and the Croton Reservoir in Westchester County.
Has the ground water contamination at Indian Point affected any nearby water supplies?
No. Entergy has tested a number of locations nearby to determine if contamination is getting off site through the ground water. We have tested two wells at the LaFarge gypsum plant, the Trap Rock Quarry and the Algonquin outfall, all located south of Indian Point in the general direction of regional groundwater flow. All samples have come back as negative for radioactivity above background. We also tested an abandoned well in Verplanck. It was also negative for radioactivity.
What isthe dose impact from this ground water contamination?
Entergy has done a bounding calculation using conservative estimates for releases of radioactivity. The dose impact from releases to the Hudson River is many times smaller than what is permitted by federal regulation, <.1% of our limits. Doses to the general public from all liquid releases are limited to 3 mrem/year whole body and 10 mrem/year to any critical organ.
S J .
How do these doses compare with other sources of radiation exposure?
As a comparison, the table to the right shows typical low dose radiation T 002 fi.,fi`,,
exposure associated Usin!'A~io edete'to with common activities.
The average amount of radiation in the United States is about 360 millirem per year or about 1 mrem/day. .4, ~~4 5 f
-SIs~ - ~iii:
What is Entergy doing to determine the extent of the groundwater contamination?
Very shortly after finding tritium in the existing wells on site, Entergy embarked on a comprehensive program to determine the extent of contamination, characterize groundwater flow and identify the source of the leak. We hired an expert consulting firm, GZA, to advise us on installing new monitoring wells and began construction of about 25 wells located throughout the site. The first group of wells was constructed near the IP2 spent fuel pool and transformer yard. All of these wells have been developed and sampled. We are currently finishing the installation of a second group of wells that are strategically located across the site near potential sources of radioactive water.
Our hydrology firm has reviewed existing site drawings and previous groundwater studies to develop a conceptual model of how water flows on site. Additionally, Entergy has sampled the storm water drains on site and reviewed historical records. All of the wells are sampled for radioactivity after they have been drilled and developed.
Where has radioactivity been found on site?
Entergy has identified tritium at a number of sample locations on the property. The map below shows the monitoring well locations where tritium has been found above detectable levels. The concentration of tritium is highest adjacent to the IP2 spent fuel pool and in the IP2 transformer yard. No radioactivity has been found off-site.
-KMVI&AOWAIMUaU LF Tritium pCi/L
- >250,000 4 100,000-250,000 + 20)000-100,000 41000- 20,000 4 <1000
+-Phase 2 wells What is Entergy doing to develop monitoring wells?
We mobilized quickly to engage a nationally known firm that has experience in groundwater modeling. Entergy has been following the advice of our expert hydrologist regarding the placement, depth and sampling regime for our monitoring wells. The first few wells were installed in and near the IP2 fuel storage building while there was still excavation work for the gantry crane. One of those wells is about 200-feet deep and needed to be drilled through very hard rock formations containing marble, granite and limestone.
Two of the Phase 1 wells are located inside the IP2 turbine building which presented a number of challenges to lift a heavy drill rig past scaffolding and high voltage equipment. In some of the locations there are underground service lines that had to be avoided. We used a vacuum drilling technique to remove the first 5-7 feet of surface so that we did not endanger our workers or hit buried lines. Ground penetrating radar was employed to ensure the area was clear of hidden metal. In a couple of instances we needed to relocate the wells because we encountered obstructions. To obtain qualified environmental samples the wells must be flushed and equalized before drawing samples meaning there is a delay between drilling the bore hole, installing the well and getting samples.
Thirteen of fourteen wells in Phase 2 have already been developed.
Entergy benchmarked the timeline and techniques used at other facilities. We are proceeding at a good pace consistent with our desire to understand groundwater patterns while ensuring that we do not jeopardize worker safety.
What are we doing to find the source of the leak?
Entergy has examined the historical sampling records to get a baseline picture of groundwater quality on site. We have conducted inspections of the storm drain systems, curtains drains around IP1 and the IP2 Primary Auxiliary Building sump.
We have also engaged a specialty underwater construction firm and video inspection firm to perform a video of the IP2 spent fuel pool. The video inspection covered the accessible areas of the fuel pool above the fuel racks. In this inspection, we noted about six anomalies in the pool's stainless steel liner. We sent divers into the pool to leak test those areas on the liner using a vacuum box technique. Although the vacuum box test did not reveal any through wall leaks, we repaired the areas with an epoxy coating.
The well monitoring program is also designed to help detect the source of the leak. The wells are positioned to help determine if specific tanks, pools or sumps are potential sources.
'What is a split sample?
Entergy, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation have taken samples from wells on site and at off-site locations. In a split sample a single portion or aliquot of water is obtained from the well, stream, or surface water body and divided among the three parties. Each entity then analyzes the sample at their own facility to provide independent validation of the sample results. NRC, DEC and Entergy have taken split sample of monitoring wells on site, off-site locations, and the Hudson River.
Where are the samples analyzed?
Entergy can perform some of the analyses for radioactivity on site. For more sensitive tests, Entergy uses an environmentally qualified lab at Fitzpatrick or a commercial lab in Georgia. The NRC has sent their sample to Oak Ridge and the DEC uses the NYS Health Department's Wadsworth lab in Albany, N.Y.