ML061280082
| ML061280082 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 01/06/2005 |
| From: | Chenault W Entergy Nuclear South |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| ER-W3-2001-1149-015 | |
| Download: ML061280082 (8) | |
Text
Page 1 of 83
- 1. OVERVIEW t SIGNATURES Facility : Waterford 3 SES Document Reviewed : ER-W3-2001-1149-015 ChangelRev.:
Description : IPU Impact on FSAR Chapter 15 System Designators)/Description : N/A Description of Proposed Change :
ER-0113,2001-1149-015 is an Interdiscipline ER that provides the evaluation of the proposed Extended Power Uprate (EPU) to determine if there are any impacts on FSAR Chapter 15 that result from the implementation of EPU. This ER is input to ER-W3-2001-1149-000, the Nuclear Change ER that provides the justification for the acceptability of the implementation of EPU at Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station. ER-W3-2001-1149-015 revises FSAR Chapter 15 to address EPU-related impacts via DRN 03-2067 ; these changes are listed and reviewed in Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3 of this 50 .59 review .
Calculations were completed in support of the evaluation of the analyses and evaluations discussed in Chapter 15 of the FSAR . Each of these calculations and analyses is summarized in ER-W3-2001-1149-015 with regards to the purpose of the calculation and the conclusions reached in the calculation . No hardware changes are required as a result of these calculations and analyses done in support of the FSAR Chapter 15 evaluations .
A number of the proposed FSAR changes are identified as typographical/editorial and do not affect the plant design bases or any plant functions or operations as identified in FSAR Chapter 15 . These changes only correct typographical errors or they are editorial in nature . See Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3 for details_
Several changes are considered to be "FSAR-only" changes in accordance with procedure LI-113 and do not require further evaluation . These changes are listed in Table 1 along with the specific justification from Li-113 which allows the change without further evaluation .
One change requires a 50 .59 evaluation because it was not explicitly discussed in the EPU license amendment request (LAR) Power Uprate Report (PUR) or its supplements. This is related to FSAR Section 15 .1 .3 .1, concerning the use of a Peak Linear Heat Rate of 24 kwift criteria for determining if fuel melt will occur. See Section IV of this 50 .59 Review for this evaulation, The balance of the FSAR changes are related to the changes discussed in the PUR portion of the LAR for the EPU; these changes are listed in Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3 of this 50 .59 review. The acceptability of these changes are dependent on the NRC's approval of the pending Waterford 3 EPU LAR .
Check the applicable review(s) : (Only the sections indicated must be included in the Review.)
EDITORIAL CHANGE of a Licensing Basis Document I Section I SCREENING Sections I and 11 required I
50 .59 EVALUATION EXEMPTION Sections 1, 11, and III required f
© i 50 .59 EVALUATION (#: 05-001 )
I Sections 1, 11, and IV required Preparer : W.H . Chenauit ercon I DE { "106_1_05 Name (print) Company / Department i -bate T ~
Reviewer :
Ralph Sch-wartzbeck "ITZ, Enercon / DE l 1/08105 Name (print) ! U Sign l I Company / Department f Date OSRC :
Chairman's Name (print) / Signature° - l Date
[Required only for Programmatic Exdusloil Screenings (see Section 5.8) and 50 .59 Evaluations."
LI-101-01, Rev. 5
Page 2 of 83 II . SCREENINGS A. Licensingi Basis Document Review
- 1. Does the proposed activity impact the facility or a procedure as described in any of the following Licensing Basis Documents?
Operating License YES CHANGE # and/or SECTIONS IMPACTED License f- operating i TS NRC Orders If "YES", obtain NRC approval prior to implementing the change by initiating an LBD change in accorda nce with NMM LI-'[ 13 . (See Section 5.2[131 for exceptions .)
LBDs controlled under 50.59 NO CHAN GE # (if applicable) and/or SECTIONS IMPACTED D~ ER-W3-2001-1149-015, DRN No . 03-2¬/67 Technical Requirements M a nua l Core Operating .Limi ts Report NRC Safety Evaluation Report and supplements for the initial FSAR' NRC Safety Evaluations for amendments to the Operating License If "YES", perform an Exemption Review per Section III OR perform a 50 .59 Evaluation per Section IV OR obtain NRC approval prior to implementing the change . If obtaining NRC approval, document the LBD change in Section ILA .5; no further 50 .59 review is required . However, the change cannot be impleme nted until approved by the NRC . AND i ni ti ate a n L.BD change in accordance with NMMTL1-113. ~
~- LBDs controlled under other O CHANGE # (if applicable) and/or SECTIONS IMPACTED regulations Quality Assurance Program Manual Fire Protection Program
[ (includes the Fire Hazards Analysis)
Offsite Dose Calculations Manual"' `
If "YES", evaluate any changes in accordance with the appropriate regulation AND initiate an LBO change in accordance N M I-11 3. N o further 50.59 review is required.
with M L
' if "YES," see Section 5 .2[5]. No Lt3D change is required .
If'YES," notify the responsible department and ensure a 50 .54 Evaluation is performed . Attach the 59 .54 Review .
' Changes to the Emergency Plan, Fire Protection Program, and Offsite Dose Calculation Manual must be approved by the OSRC in accordance with NMM OM-1 19 .
If "YES," evaluate the change in accordance with the requirements of the facility's Operating License Condition or under 501 .59, as appropriate, i.1-101-01, Rev . 5
50 .59 REVIEW FORM Page 3 of 83
- 2. Does the proposed activity involve a test or experiment not described in the FSAR? E] Yes No If "yes," perform a 50 .59 Evaluation per Section IV OR obtain NRC approval prior to implementing the change AND initiate an LSD change in accordance with NMM LI-'113.
1f obtaining NRC approval, document the change in Section II .A .5 ; no further 50 .59 review is required . However, the change cannot be implemented until approved by the NRC.
- 3. Basis not Explain why the proposed activity does ot does impact the Operating Lice nse,Technical Specifications and/or the FSAR and why the proposed activity does or does not involve a new test or experiment not previously described in the FSAR . Discuss other LBDs it impacted . Adequate basis must be provided within the Screening such that a third-party reviewer can reach the same conclusions . Simply stating that the change does not affect TS or the FSAR is not an accep:abfe basis. See EOI 50 .59 Guide¬fines Section 5.3 .2 for guidance .
ER-W3-2001-1149-015 is an Interdiscipline ER with the scope of providing the evaluation of FSAR Chapter 15 and any required FSAR changes as a result of the proposed implementation of EPU. The ER documents evaluation of the Waterford 3 Extended Power Uprate (EPU) effects on the FSAR Chapter 15 analysis and associated licensing documentation . Operation under EPU conditions may require plant SSCs to operate under different conditions, meet different performance criteria, or perform new or different functions. Evaluation of FSAR Chapter 15 is necessary to address the potential for EPU to affect plant's response to transients and postulated accidents. While the ER will identify the effects of EPU on these analyses, other ERs will evaluate the affected plant systems and implement any required changes to ensure readiness for operation under EPU.
Operating License:
The Waterford Unit 3 operating license is impacted by the Extended Power Uprate, however, the license amendment request for the extended power uprate (LAR NPF-38-249) addresses those applicable changes, and none of these changes are linked to the changes provided by this ER, Therefore, the proposed activity does not impact the Waterford Unit 3 operating license.
Technical Specifications :
Waterford Unit 3 operating Technical Specifications are impacted by the Extended Power Uprate, however, the license amendment request for the extended power uprate (LAR NPF-38-249) addresses those applicable changes, and none of these changes are a direct result of the changes associated with the Chapter 15 ER .. Therefore, the proposed activity does not impact Waterford Unit 3 Technical Specifications.
NRC Orders :
Waterford Unit 3 has received NRC Orders pertaining to plant security and reactor vessel head inspections .
Due to the scope of this ER, this ER does not impact the NRC Orders and the NRC Orders do not impact the evaluations within the scope of this ER .
FSAR :
There are multiple FSAR changes implemented by this ER . See Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3 for details and review of these changes .
Technical Specification Bases:
There are no specific Technical Specification Bases changes associated FSAR Chapter 15 . Technical Specification Bases changes associated with EPU are addressed in, and will be implemented by, ER-W3-2001-114=3-000, Technical Requirements Manual :
There are no specific TRM changes associated FSAR Chapter 15 . TRM changes associated with EPU are addressed in, and will be implemented by, ER-W3-2001-1149-000, Core Operating Limits Report :
The COLR for reload will be processed under the Cycle 14 Reload ER . The activities associated with this ER do not impact the COLR since the ER itself makes no changes in the operation of the plant, does not L1-101-01, Rev. 5
50 .59 REVIEW FORM Page 4 of 83 impact the type of fuel used and does not change the limits defined in the COLR .
NRC Safety Evaluation Report and Supplements for the initial FSAR :
The NRC will review the EPU license amendment submittal and issue a Safety Evaluation Report (SER) for the changes within the scope of the amendment request. The changes within the scope of this ER are bounded by the license amendment request. Changes not specifically addressed in the amendment request are considered editorial, changes that directly support the EPU request, or changes that indirectly support the EPU request. None of the changes within the scope of this ER were determined to invalidate the WF3 SER or supplements or require NRC approval prior to implementation .
NRC Safety Evaluations for amendments to the Operating License:
The NRC will review the EPU license amendment submittal and issue an SER for the changes within the scope of the amendment request. The changes within the scope of this ER are bounded by the license amendment request, Changes not specifically addressed in the amendment request are considered editorial, changes that directly support the EPU request, or changes that indirectly support the EPU request. None of the changes within the scope of this ER were determined to invalidate the SERs for existing license amendments or require NRC approval prior to implementation .
Quality Assurance Program Manual :
This activity complies with all requirements of the Entergy Quality Assurance Program Manual ; as applicable . This activity does not change any commitments contained in the QAPM . Therefore, this activity does not require a change to the QAPM .
This activity does not impact the interaction of Waterford Unit 3 personnel and offsite agencies in response to an emergency and does not change any of Entergy's policies or commitments to nuclear accident responses. ER-W3-2001-1149-000 will address the overall impact on the Emergency Plan, if any, related to the implementation of EPU.
Fire Protection Program and Fire Hazards Analysis :
This ER is a paper change only, which does not authorize any changes to plant equipment or procedures .
Therefore, no changes to the Fire Protection Program or Fire Hazards Analysis are required .
Offsite Dose Calculations Manual :
The ODCM contains the methodology and parameters used in the calculation of offsite doses resulting from radioactive gaseous and liquid effluents, This activity does not impact radioactive gaseous or liquid effluents. Therefore, no changes to the ODCM is required .
Test or experiment not described in the FSAR :
This ER is a paper change only, which does not authorize any changes to plant equipment or procedures .
Therefore, this activity does not involve a test or experiment that is not described in the FSAR .
- 4. References Discuss the methodology for performing LBD searches . State the location of relevant licensing document information and explain the scope of the review such as electronic search criteria used (e.9 ., key words) or the general extent of manual searches per Section 5 .4 .1[5](d) of LI-101 . NOTE : Ensure that manual searches are performed using controlled copies of the documents. If you have any questions, contact your site Licensing department.
LBDsfDocuments reviewed via keyword search : Keywords :
For evaluation portion of this 50 .59 Review, the kw:ft, fuel melt, linear heat rate LBDs in Section ll .A .1 were searched with the listed key words . For the remainder of the 50 .59 review a manual search was done of Chapter 15 of the FSAR . Clue to the extensive changes made to Chapter 15, keyword searching was not feasible since nearly every section, table and figure was changed.
LBDs/Documents reviewed manually:
FSAR Chapter 15, 72 11 .13, 7 .2 .2 . 1 .1 1-1-101-01, Rev. 5
50.59 REVIEW FORM Page 5 of 83
- 5. Is the validity of this Review dependent on any other change? (See Section 5 .3 .4 of the EOI Yes 10 CFR 50.59 Program Review Guidelines.)
F-1 No If "YES", list the required changes/submittals . The changes covered by this 50.59 Review cannot be implemented without approval of the other identified changes (e , g license amendment request) .
Establish an appropriate notification mechanism to ensure this action is completed .
Validity of this review is also dependent on concurrent implementation of ER-W3-2001-1149-000 . for which an action has been created in ERD . In addition, an action has been created in ERD for ER-W3-2001-1149-000 to review this ER against the EPU LAIR SER (when issued by the NRC) to ensure that the ER and this 50 .59 review remain in agreement with the approved SER .
LAR NPF-38-249 and its supplements (refer to ER-W3-2001-1149-015, Section 2 .2 .6) were issued requesting NRC approval for implementation of EPU at the Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station . This submittal encompasses the analyses completed, and methodology utilized in support of the EPU evaluations .
The changes to the FSAR incorporate information relevant to the analyses that support implementation of the EPU at Waterford as discussed in LAR NPF-38-249 (and supplements). Therefore, for these changes no evaluation pursuant to 10CFR50 .59 is required. See attached tables of changes (Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3), with cross-reference to the PUR submittal and/or supplements for a basis for each change .
Discussion of the changes in computer codes and methodologies used for Chapter 15 reanalysis for the EPU are contained in Entergy letter W3F1 -2003-0074 dated November 13, 2003 which contains the Waterford 3 EPU LAR. Attachment 6 of the letter contains Extended Power Uprate (EPU) report Appendix 1, "Safety Evaluation Report Compliance ." This appendix contains the computer codes and methodologies used in ECCS performance analyses and for non-LOCA transient analyses and approved by an NRC issued SER . The Appendix 1 Introduction identifies the computer codes and methodologies that support the LOCA and non-LOCA transient analyses performed for the EPU . The tables and text of the Introduction identify the tables in Section 1 of the Appendix that contain the following information for each code and methodology:
" The NRC Safety Evaluation Report (SER) that documents regulatory approval
- The SER limitations and constraints
- Statements indicating how each constraint or limitation is met Therefore, changes in the methods of evaluation will be reviewed and approved by the NRC via the safety evaluation report (SER) for the WF3 EPU LAR.
(-I-101-01, Rev . 5
- §kEgEAFORm met
_ _ . . ~~ ~A~
~ d~~FSaR
.. S ~ ~s ~~~~.~~~ ~
~ AR ~ Supa ~ kP~~ ~ups mn~ ~/@ ~~p\ MA b~e ~~9~ vw ~
~c_ ~R ~~_@} ~ te e# Cmm~m_$~~ ~ mr~
~ mm_~(> ~ <<R ~ #te a lSJ~~ zgJ~~~~~~rn/¥~~~~L~R~FSO~kRvl ~\m~s~&~\~y&~9\\~R}~&~ ~~ Gm~~G+~re * ~m~~w A~and<<rte #B~~ ~ms ~~~SJ<<2% ~v~ ~a~lry m~ ms _m <<ate%dm mmr ~ meEPU~ R and ~r mGm, 5% >>Swam<< ~Q~S~glK~v4 de~nA~ <<a~tyy *~m&m 4 s<<~Rp~h mgmaa~e e :SK~
gy m) ~ ~ S NW eeke p _ r?Ue(~A %b~ I6<< b mesm~~ g +#w<<!m~
+/-!$ tzl4 mk~#. EPU ~ R s~ i @)~ u_ e ~R
~~~ z Dag : 4 $G %~~ . app v}
~~, z~$tt<<l E SuW~~ l<<tz%~ymmW E ~~ G~
~~i z~$3?gg ~ ~ w @e~ FB>> ~h~~ n ++7,
~s#~ ~r¢0o9,~a c E~ R~ &
~~lz~amlsl~ k&d% mdm Sw% ~m7 ~r
~ dbbgi ~Cmmgm<<<<, , Lg Q,~.
u6alAAmml~ ate, gJ~ &m '
mce46<<~ ~ t ~~ +/-2w r bmi~mequmm& ~ ~yG!
~ m can+~yam~y k. ~ GaGe c~Gm a2~@m<<e~a r~+d%r~ myk '
m~ me
¢Sew a3~~e<<m~
R~ _a +/-~smv<<E m~Glpyobme#ma a7~ m~ s 9~~ em Sw l
% +m7de~mE lEtt~ z4zttl ~~ ~ am b Cm~ya a3~vi Nomaq<< %F~ R~3m +/-w tt ~~ §yme ~mR
- Fkwt ~+/-~G<<2<<~v~ ~u6k &F~RSam Sexy
. . ~~m<<Uum __ _ __ ~ ;
)s!\\~~>>!&tt2 ~~~\nc <<~/ ~~\~~yqa\~v ~~ Nomm<<se~\R~~n~t~\ ~o~mgs~~~~~
'~~~%rte!>> CN2~$s%~vo ~ukG &~aRS~i SgJw LT+/-~ym??~vl
~tta ~..~\~ m+%\n~\~~>>ow\~v~~~~e~~<<m~~d<<\mk \\n~. ~~ ~Gtbm/~D~~3~*/a\~v
+/-~ylJa ~ymmEaw ~%~ymg o,~<<o sam D_ <<m!~matey G w&m am mmed~ ~h ~U~ R ( ~ r ~dm
~m~~ mJS~,I d<<u_m %eW&d @~h %%!_eg ads#cap me mama #ksK~
' ~~%~wmglE ~v4 Gmp& m~Zrm~ls~mW a %e dee+~
R m imm+ebUk~_r Su9~~ E~ ~R ~R k +ageb~h CEO Smde ~amp}~u~ a Gs%~! . am_m}
AG~i game m<<WeN~ E~~ mram E ~i6 .
' a eau anm C~ _m y mR LdGGt~ws
Table 'l Affected FSAR Sections Supporting E.P^U _~ Supporting FSAR PUR Section(s) 1 Event Calculation(s) f Remarks Section Docurnent(s)
Credit for the CPCS Variable Overpower Trip A decrease in the low steam generator pressure (LSGP) trip and MSIS setpoints The impact of the above changes results in no violation to the DNB SAFDLs .
15 .1 .1 .4 2 .13 .1.1 .4 -~V advertent~~..^_. CN-TAS-02-87 Rev 1 ^ The objective _of the inadvertent opening The changes are covered by the 50 .59 Review Attachment 3 to Opening of a LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 of an SG Atmospheric Dump Valve EPU LAR and specifically the Form Section W3F1-2003-0074 Steam Generator LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 (IOSGADV) re-analysis was to document sections andlor tables listed in the ILA .5 (Le .,
(Table 8314 .0-1) !Atmospheric Ithe impact of: Supporting EPU PUR Sections) dependenton Dump Valve The change in plant parameters due to column of this table . LAR approval)
(ADV) the increase in rated power from 3441 (IOSGADV) MWt to 3716 MWt Using CENTS instead of CESEC as i the NSSS simulation code The change in the most negative MTC from -4 .0x10 -Q ApPF to -4 .2 x10' 4 Ap1°F The decrease in the most negative MTC has the potential to add more positive reactivity during the cooldown .
The impact of the above changes results in no violation of the specified acceptable
- fuel design limits (SAFDL),
T _ -
15 .1 .2 .1 i2 .13 .1 .2 .1 'Decrease in CN-TAS-03-18 Rev 1 1INo changes to FSAR Section 15 .1 .2 .1 Changes Feedwattar LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 The fuel performance (DNBR and LHR)
- Temperature with characteristics and dose for this event are Single Active bounded by the anticipated operational Faifure (SAF) occurrence (AOO) wfLOAC event . The AOO wiLOAC event is assumed to use up all reserved DNBR margin prior to the LOAC portion of the event . Bounded by FSAR Section 15 .1 2 .3 . .___----------
15 .1 .2 .2 2_13 .12 .2 Increase . .in . .. CN-TAS-03-18 Rev 1 ~ . No changes to ..FSAR Section 15 .1 .2 .2 o Changes T^. ,,NlA Feedwater Flow LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 The fuel performance (DNBR and LHR) with a SAF characteristics and dose for this event are bounded by the AOO w/LOAC event . The AOO w1LOAC event is assumed to use LI-101-01, Rev . 5
. . .. .....~~~~_ ....~~.~~
~~~~~k/~~~ .~~~~~...
~~d~ FS ~R S~_s __ _
~ R5 ~_(g ~
FSAR~~~~~~\~ ~~~~
~eM ~~~~~~~~~
Cam ~!_@}~ ~~
~ mama Nkum<<c~~m¥~emm~~\/g~~_
- ~~ma#g
~~R ;
~ mp>
m w~ e~dDN~ .~~.~~~~~~~~~~ .
~6,#~~~~~
AC~dm <<memmt~ukk R
. ~wR~ +/-m~£tzz 4\12a~ ~ +/-~ /~ ~~~~ \~<<\ak §~ ~ ~/§/~$s~ Rv7 ~ w+\mk m~ ~\mf_ ~~~~~~~ ~ ~/&~ ohm<<s \¢m om//_~
~~!%1a:2 ~@mm~~~~h .CN4~Jym~vO ~oe~s<<awmd% <<mum ~h am maw R meERU~R ~q~4m '
+/-4+/-t~~ S ~~~ ~~Ge ~~ %~ mgg,K ~ wo ~©~ m << a+s#~ ~ & mem2m<< .R*>> %m
+/-!&tike ~~~r ~~0~ ~+/-~y<<a<<~,! !<<m>>em~Pb~yQ~ aneb~!&n~dbme ~A<<kmlm '
TW ua a CEO S~ he m& $e u+o q EPU PUR .~ R %~v} '
~%~ mmw~%~v4
§O~Tm+ %~mUe$e~sWw ~amm~umny GaG~~\
m~~~ mr s~i _awls% web<<rw~ mme+m~\ '
me me !_>>i m g +/-)HERq~ ~ aM~ & W+/-<<ada~h ;
m<<dam sm<<~ Ama <<~ &m. ERU~R ~ '
E~e+agem~7~&?9
%haeea :_ m Gtr '
mmU% _;~ ame '
Gu~~l~R~ame A~~,<<~ mtm&m~ 6 m+~W~ma~~a
~+/-elm dCN4~ Csa\
6 me <<~ ~ ~a r!
ash +am:md~h~oe
~~ mR mm~ Q~h EPU :
_ _ _ ~% :
~\\4 ~~ ~,~ ~~~~~ ~/\/~ ~m Cm~~39~u ~ Tk ba&~mt A/m~ \\~~ W +/-+<<s m mm~\~ W \ ~m~\\_ ~
0e ~~ ~Ty<<a<<~v~ @0&D2 whyOe~sa~ i+db EPULRadG<<c ~p me ~~ m~ Gm
~~~~5$¢9K~v4 ©>>~emeW92a +amsm~Zrbb~ ~Qkmt~ ; u :SKe,
~ymaeb~R% yz+/-yam ~+~~ ~U~RSwm@)~+#W~ m Tk aea C~ ~ Ubrmm me ~ umn3 mG mil . ~~ R +p v }
c0~ T mdeb <<mome~B ~S +w
- m~ d_ m~;~hlam aPu m me .
l+/- HERNCE ~k~U %@
__ <<mAa<<e<<~ #m . _ _ _
~ftl~~.~~\~~ ~ ~ ymm~ %m~ \~T~ \3~ ~v Leo ~\\da m ~ ~t mm+ jm p/~~ R y m/~k<<~ ~~~ mss 6~
A~i zl$t&, e@mFmer ~S~ymg<<~,~ hrkAs~)~+e~~2a _mar ~~hERUUR~%~om~vw
~v k <<r§!!<<h ~ +~P~ %m ~ R~ y~g4m ~v4 m©ur 4~0P me<< matey a~am mdmeem&~h +3m, ,fir ~am
~b &7~Jm¢ b~~r amore $e+Aao m~Zt%~~&~mkhme ~nkSK~
mm} ~i m<<eaUkp~re~a S99mqEPUPUR ~de~d~ m ew s3m&)~umna m6 %by ~RaP~ a&
&d<<mmea met GPmpaW y@S web&c~!_~ more 77~
maq<<~ R@~& ~r6mS~0q LHS<<taws
50.59 REVIEW FORM .. ~~ ._
Page 9 of 83 Table 1 Affected FSAR Sections
..~- ..--..
Supporting EP . ._ .
Supporting PUR Section(g)_^t Nature of Changes Made to the ; 50 .59 Review
.vent. Calculation(s) f Remarks Document(s)
FSAR I Category actuation setpoints addressed in the EPU LAR . Evaluation A reduction in CEA worth at trip b . One change on page 15 .1-23 Section IV Transition to the CENTS transient (change in time to 16 .6 applies .
simulation code seconds) was not in the equivalent PUR Section or Change in most negative MTC from -
.0x30" rlpf'F to --4 .2x1p-' Apl°F
-4 Table, however, this entry is supported by the listed The response for the power uprate is calculation (CN-TAS-02-97) slightly more adverse than the current which is the basis for the rest power level . A limited extent of SAFDL of the section, and therefore violation is seen to occur for the inside implicitly covered by the EPU containment steam line breaks . This is LAR, discussed in revised FUR section 2 .13 .1 .3 .1, revised per Attach 1 to W3F1- c . The use of a peak linear h( :,it 2004-0096 . rate of 24 kwlft criteria for determining if fuel melt will occur was not explicitly discussed in the LAR PUR or its supplements . It is discussed in the Evaluation Section of this 50-59 Review 16A .3 .2 .13 2
.3,2
.1 d and 4 All CN-TAS-03-18 Rev No changes to FSAR Section 15 .1 .3 .2 . . . Only editorial changes to this . .. . ditorial 1, Rods In (ARI) Reference Attachment 1 to The lower mode SLBs are not being section (i .e ., changes to Table Steam Line Break Letter W3 F1-2004-0061 reanalyzed . As the boiling point is and Figures numbers) .
(SLB) (RAI Q&R 15) unaffected by the power uprate or use of LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 3the CENTS code versus the CESEC code, the AOR far these events is judged LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 ito remain bounding.
J he increase in rated thermal power has
' not altered the two important driving parameters in the subcritical SLB analysis . It has not altered the temperature dependent SHUTDOWN MARGIN figure (applicable for subcritical conditions) in the plant COLR . The reactivity balance performed in the reload analysis process for the lower mode SLB analysis assumes, due to the reduced initial primary system temperatures In the lower modes, that the minimum RCS
- temperatures reach 212°F . This assumption would still be bounding .
LI-101-01, Rev. 5
. ~.~.~..~~.~~~. .~. . . .. .. .
.~~/}~
.-~~~~k§U-~ .-~~~ A ~deF~R~~n s m~ Nk<<e@chAA>>~~e&me~~09~vw BAR Vim_ PUR~c_%%~ ~eM Cam b!&Mgl ~maU ~~R ~m~~
.. ~ ~ . ~~~ ~ ~mmA~> ~ ~..~~/
~ e ~ e~/k~~! ~ ~~>>y~
...\ . .~~ ~.
. ~~~:' . . ~ .~~..~~~ m~~db $eF~ Rmm.m~ ..4. .~ ~ .~~.~ ~ ~. .~~~.~ ..
gEtll +/- SJ :a gmm~sm CN4~ $s23~v~ leaei a me7~ +SLeaq~y% pedm~s~ mm~ &~h m.q~v<<
(~Gms RNq~br ~w~y<<aa~vl ~Beam_4th +W4ame EPU~Rmd ;p~~&me ~~ ~Gm
, z~zt%&2& P~T+~~r ~ +/-~ y~J :¢ ~v4 Gwa9 daq~ mGms>>~zrm~aaGlk m me u : 5K~
+/-aJwls ~mai ~e~<<r+mUk~_r>> y~E su<<~ gEPU~R~dmb) .~#+mlm
~vk <<rA!!<<h u~ cumne m6 G~~ . ~~Ra+_m>
8% wawam¢ U~gmecE~smd Uklmmth mm mds dm ~ c~ EC m~ a $eNSSS~w~lm zlz tI$B " %a
~v k~ra!!<<h~ ~ Cnmew _g mg#m N~ ~m .
5 b wap <<m<< ¢ G~~ a~zF 0 4 :~~ 3p2F mm)
,G>>t, /Jawt, !~ @ y~@mm fN4~33+ ~v0 No+aq<< bFSR~ am +/-7t~ ~ CGga ~mA
}NO~:Cy~wgJe ~u<<k G ~a a ~Weae vmum "ws<<A~k % m6>> %0~t~ %R Se i ~§zt&
l mm mew w J~ k
~ m!w m~sammm
~h ,meLOCC m ~huh m~ &
f~% m& met Cv ~ s
'mom m+/-l
~ %~ mq%% ~v, _ _ ~~~_~~~~&:
45w~ ~~ ~~ ~:~~~~ 3u~/T<< CN4~ 3\la~v! N~ n qG >>~ARC /mlsw~ ~e 9q/~~~ r am\ ~Edy~
~~ w~ y~ a¢ ~v~ T % qem K m~m kmr m>>~h
~aM~keaevmum~~ ;
' y~aRlswt\.FmmaEm ~ '
p Ar a<<e{ONBR mdLH m dmd,m+ ae% mmemKaUm
. .. . _~ ~_. .~~ . . _, ~ ~ f~ $ ~ . . ~ ~ ...~.. . ~~ . . . . . .
ls\:a ~ / D: to ~~~a \~ ~~ m~ y~\/~\4 ~ /o~&\ate me<<\~ ~} ~ \# GagGam mm~ &~h ) +.m ~v_
- ~ km+r , <<aG&mtmH ~s%d<<umeN~bima ash ~U~ RaW m~ wm&me ~~ A~Gm
'v mum( ~) yuppe_~ nn ~#m elm ~+ Gm<<am~h ~CC m3msa6~ %~~BIQk Ach ;a :5(Q:
mmeWa mmka9 ~lmmC~~~GrmmC~~ asup~igEPUPURSdm@) ;+9<<e&m s,m am) beNS~ Qmu~lm~! ~umne GGm~~ . ~~ R +~aq
~Qr yma%~v, ~elymmewUk~~rm~+
~ R~yo J!% ~v4 ~
Tkr~~ h$e~s%m#mum LQm<<t~ys
Page 1 1 of 83 Table t Af fected FSAR S ections Supporting EPU . _.Supporting FSAR Nature of Changes Made to the 54 .58 Review PUR Section(s) ' Event Calculation(s)1 Remarks Section FSAR Category Uocurne nt(s)
.. ..~ .__.___ .
15 .2 .1 .4 2 .13.2 .1 .4m LOOP CN-TAS-03-18 Revm1 _ . The fuel performance (DNBR and LHR). . .m.. The changes are covered by the 50 .59 Review consequences of this event are no more EPU LAR and specifically the Form Section (Section 2 .13 .2 .1 .4~ v LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 Revised per Attach adverse than the total loss of forced sections and/or tables listed to the II .A.5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 5 to W3F1-2004- reactor coolant flow event (UFSAR Supporting EPU FUR Sections) dependent on 15 .3 .2 .1), an infrequent event . The peak column of this table . LAR approval) 0096) pressure consequences of this event are no more adverse than the loss of
'condenser vacuum event, a moderate frequency even t (UFSAR 15 .2 .1 .3) .
152 .1 .5 2 .132 .1 .5 Steam Pressure CN-TAS-03-18 Rev 1 -- No changes to FSAR Section 15 .2 .1 .5 No Changes /A Regulator Failure LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 The failure of the steam pressure regulator would result in closing the turbine throttle valves . This transient is no more adverse than a loss of condenser vacuum (UFSAR Section 15 .2 .1 .3), where the maximum rate of throttle valve closure is assu med .
15 .2 .2 .1 2 .13.2 .2 .1 Loss of External CN-TAS-02-76 Rev 0 FSAR Section 15 .2 .2 .1 revised to reflect The changes are covered by. the . . . 50 .59 Review 1 Load with SAF (NOTE ; CN-TAS-02-76 FSAR Section 15 .2 .1 .3 as the bounding EPU LAR and specifically the Form Section was performed to confirm event per PUR 2 .13 .2 .1 .3 . sections and/or tables fisted in the ILA .5 (i .e .,
that the Loss of Load Loss of load with single failure (UFSAR Supporting EPU PUR Section(s) dependent on Event was less limiting Section 15 .2_2.1) is no more adverse column of this table . LAR approval) than the LOCV . than the Toss of condenser vacuum event Consistent with the current (UFSAR 15 .2 .1 .3) . Both of these events FSAR, only the LOCV is involve a sudden reduction in the removal being reported .) of heat from the reactor coolant system .
CN-TAS-03-18 Rev 1 The foss of condenser vacuum has the more severe initiator in that both steam LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 flow and feedwater flow are terminated by the initiator. Additionally, as an infrequent event is pointing at the more restrictive moderate frequency event, the application of the potentially more restrictive acceptance criteria to the less frequent event would be conservative .
15 .2 .22 2 .13_2_22 Turbine Trip ..with CN-TAS-03-18 Rev 1 FSAR Section 15 .2 .2 .2 revised to reflect The changes are covered by the 50 .59 Review SAF LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 FSAR Section 15 .2 .1 .3 as the bounding EPU LAR and specifically the Form Section event per PUR 2 .13 .2 .1 .3 . sections and/or tables listed in the II .A .5 (i .e .,
This event is no more adverse than the Supporting EPU PUR Section(s) dependent on i Loss of Condenser Vacuum Event (FSAR column of this table . LAR approval)
LI-101-01, Rev . 5
Table 1
_._ .. .. ... .. _. Affected FSAR Sections
.. ...._.. ._ ._._ . ....._._ ._. .._ _.___ _ _._. . . . . ._._ ... .. . ._ . ..._. . ._~._-___. . --___ ..__ .__.._ .~_ .__.__.____. . ._...__.. .
Supporting I Pt3 . Supporting FSAR Nature of Changes Made to the ! 50 .59 Review pUR Section(s) ' went Calculation(s) ! Remarks Section FSAR Category Document(s)
__ .. __~_ ._ ~_.~_ .. . ..... . . _ _ .___ .__ ._~. ._ . . .._ . _ .__ ._ ._. .._ ..____ ._. ._ ~ .. ..___ _
f -75 .2 .2 .3) . From a fuel performance . . . .. ... ..
(DNBR and LHR) standpoint, each event represents a total loss of load with a four
_ pump flow coa stdown .
15_2 .2 .3 2 .1 3 .2 .2 3 LOCV with . . CN-TAS-02-53 Rev 1 Discussion in FSAR Section 15 .2 .2 .3 was .------------- are covered by the The changes 50 .59 Review Concurrent Single LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 deleted since it was bounded by FSAR EPU LAR and specifically the Farm Section Failure Section 15 .2 .1 .3, Loss of Condenser sections and/or tables listed in the ILA,5 (i .e .,
Vacuum with no SAF . I Supporting EPU PUR Section(s) i dependent on column of this table . ` LAR approval) 15 .2 .2 .4 ^ . 2.13 .22.4 ; Lass-of-Normal CN-TAS-03-18 Rev 1 - FSAR Section 15 .2 .2 .4 was revised to The changes are covered by the 50 .59 Review AC Power with LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 state that the consequences are bounded) EPU LAR and specifically the Form Section SAF by Section 15 .3 .2 .1 . sections and/or tables listed in the i ILA .5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-Q4-119, Rev 4 Any credible single failure of an active Supporting EPU PUR Sections) dependent on component concurrent with a loss of all column of this table . ! LAR approval) normal AC power produces consequences less severe than those I following a single reactor coolant pump
_._._ ...._..... ........ _ __ . shaft seizure(UFSAR 15-3,31),
i _ _ .___m . . . .. ..__ _._ ___._. __
Toss-of-normalThe 15 .2 .2_5 ". 2"1 .3.2 .2 .5 loss-of-Normal ~[CN-TAS-03-3 Rev 1 The objective of the chang es are covered by the 50,59 Review V _
Feedwater Flow (LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 feedwater flow analysis was to document EPU LAR and specifically the Form Section I the impact of the following changes :
LTR-TAS-04-1 19, Rev 4 sections and/or tables fisted in the II .A .5 (i .e_
An increase in rated power Supporting E.PU PUR Section(s) dependent on A change to the CENTS code column of this table . LAR approval)
Reduction in steam generator pressure A reduction in CEA worth at trip The impact of the power uprate results in no violation of SG heat removal capability j for this Safety Analysis Report (SAR) event.
15 .2 . :3 .1 15,23A 2 .13 .2 .3 .1 Feedwater . CN-TAS-02-30 Rev 0 - The objective of the feedwater line break The changes are covered .. .. ..by
. .. .. .the
. . . ... . . .. 50 .59 Review (Supplemental System Pipe LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 event analysis was to document the EPU LAR and specifically the Form Section information in Breaks impact of the following changes : sections and/or tables listed in the ILA .5 (Le,,
LTR-TAS-Q4-119, Rev 4 Attach 3 to W3F1- An increase in rated power Supporting EPU PUR Section(s) dependent on 2004-0096) Use of the CENTS code in place of column of this table . LAR approval)
_ __ CESEC
~ .~__ . ._ .~__ . .._ ._ .___ . . .. . . .. _ . . ._ ._.___ . ~ . .__ . ... . . .~ .__ . ..__. . _ ..____ .___ ._._. ._. . . _ ...___. . .__.._. ______ __._~ . _~ ._W . ._
'[5 .2 .3 .2 .- . - 2 .13 .2 .12 Loss-of-Normal CN-TAS-03-3 Rev 1 The objective of loss-of-normal feedwater The changes are covered by the 50 .59 Review (Supplemental Feedwater Flow LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 flow with an active failure in the Steam EPU LAR and specifically the Form Section information in i with SAF In the Bypass Control System (SBCS) analysis sections and/or tables listed in the ILA.5 (Le,,
1-1-101-01, Rev, 5
Page 14 of 83 Table 1_ .
Affected FSAR Sections Supporting EPU ^ Supporting FSAR Nature of Changes Made to the 50.59 Review PUR Sections) 1 Event Calculation(s) f Remarks Section FSAR Category Document(s) 15 .3 .2 .2 2 .13 .3 .2 .2 ;Partial Loss of CN-TAS-03-18 Rev 1 No changes to FSAR. Section 15 .3 .2 .2 No changes .
Forced Reactor LTR-TAS-04-21, Rev 1 It is not possible to identify any credible Coolant Flow with single failure of an active component SAF which would affect the DNBR during the first few seconds of the transient (the most limiting time period) and cause the partial loss of forced reactor coolant flow to produce consequences more severe than those following a single reactor coolant pump shaft seizure (FSAR 15 .3 .3 .1) .
15 .3 .3 .1 2 .13_3_3 .1-.. .. . Single Reactor CN-TAS-03-10 Rev 0 - The total toss of forced reactor coolant The changes are covered by the . . ~ 50.59 Review .... ... .... ._
Attachment 3 to Coolant LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 flow was analyzed for power uprate to EPU LAR and specifically the ; Form Section
,Pump(RCP) Shaft evaluate the impact of the following sections and/or tables fisted in the ; II .A .5 (i .e .,
W3171-2003-0074 (Table B3/4 .0-1) `SeizurelSheared changes : Supporting EPU PUR Section(s) dependent on Shaft The increase in rated thermal power to column of this table . I LAR approval)
Additionally Letter W 3F 1-2(704-0071, 3716 MWt Additionally, Letter W3F1-2004-i Attachment I The decrease in core inlet temperature 0071, Attachment 1 Section 4 .1 .1, Section 4 .1 .1 to 533°F Supplement to Alternate Source t Term Submittal, is the basis for The use of the CENTS code rather the statement on page 15 .3-7 that than the COAST code to generate to flow coastdown curves which are input states : " . . .no more than 15 .0 cent of the fuel rods will into the 1-D HERMITS model for fuel experience DNB ."
failure evaluation 2 .13 .4 .1 .1 ( Uncontrolled CN-TAS-02-70 Rev 1 The objective of the uncontrolled CEA ! The changes are covered by the 5[1 .59 Review Control Element LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 withdrawal (CEAW) from subcriticat EPU LAR and specifically the Form Section Assembly (CEA) conditions analysis was to document the sections and/or tables listed in the II .A .5 (i .e .,
Withdrawal from impact of the following changes : Supporting EPU PUR Section(s) I dependent on Subcritical The increase in rated power from 3441 column of this table . { LAIR approval)
MWt to 3716 MWt, The use of the CENTS code instead of the CESEC code, Starting at 10% subcritical .
The impact of the above changes results in no violation of the specified acceptable fuel design limits (SAFDLs).
15 .4 .1 .2 2 . 13,4 .1 .2 Uncontrolled CEA CN-TAS-02-70 Rev 1 The objective of the uncontrolled CEA a, The majority of the changes are 517 .59 Review Table 2 .13 .0-2 Withdrawal from I LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 bank withdrawal from critical condition covered by the EPU LAR and Form Section LI-101-01, Rev . 5
50 .59 REVIEW FORM i- - -4" -
fable Affected FSAR Sections . . . . .. . . . . .. . . ... .... ....... ..
Supporting EPU Supporting I FSAR PUR Section(s) Nature of Changes Made to the 60.59 Review Section Event Calculation(s) I Remarks Category FSAR Document(s)Document(s)
Low Power LTR-TAS-04-119, Revd event analysis was to document the specifically the section ,, and/or HA-5 ps, impact of the following changes : tables listed in the Supporting dependent on The increase in rated power from 3441 EPU PUR Section(s) column of LAR approval)
MWt to 3716 MWt this table . See b below for those changes not explicitly The use of the CENTS code instead of addressed in the EPU LAR .
the CESEC code The; impact of the above changes results b . The change on page 115 .4-&
in no violation of the SAFDLs . (Insert 15 .4 .13) was not in the equivalent PUR Section, however, this entry is supported by the listed calculation (CN-~ '
TAS-02-70) which was performed to support this section and the PUR, and therefore implicitly covered by the EPU LAR, covered ------ ----- --------- ----------
15A13 2 .13 .4 .1 .3 Uncontrolled CEA CN-TAS-02-70 Rev 1 l The objective of Uncontrolled CEAVV at The changes are by he 5019 Review Withdrawal at CN-TAS-02-95 Rev 0 power event analysis was to document EPU LAR and specifically the Form Section Power the impact the following changes : sections and/or tables listed in the HA .5 (Le, LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 An increase in rated thermal power t o Supporting EPU PUR Section(s) dependent on LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 3716 IVIWt column of this table . LAR approval)
A change from the CESEC to the CENTS code as the primary NSSS simulation tool A reduction in steam generator pressure A reduction in CEA worth at trip i
The impact of the power uprate results in no violation of the SAFDILs for this SAR event,
. .... ....... . .. . . i -1------ ---
15AAA 2 .13 .4 .1 A CEA Misoperation CN-TAS-02-92 Rev 0 The purpose of this analysis was to a . The majority of the changes are50 .59 Review CN-TAS-03-69 Rev 0 demonstrate that the full-length CEA drop covered by the EPU LAIR and Form Section LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 event does not violate the DNBR and specifically the sections anchor HAI 0Y .,
LHR SAFDLs for Waterford 3 with power tables listed in the Supporting dependent on LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 uprate at 3716 MWt EPU PUR Section(s) column of ~ LAR approval) this table . See b below for those changes not explicitly addressed in the EPU LAR .
b . The changes on page 15 .4-12 (18% radial peak to average 1-O1, Rev. 5 0
L"
50 .59 REVIEW FORM Page 16 of 83 pporting EPU Supporting Nature of Changes Made to the ~ 50 .59 Review FEAR Section(s) I Event Calculation(s)1 FSAR Category Section Docurnent(s) power densityat 100% and~. . .~._.
45% radial peak to average power density at 70%) were not in the equivalent PUR Section, however, this entries are supported by the listed calculation (CN-TAS-03-69) which was performed to suppor this section and the PUR, and therefore implicitly covered by the EPULAR . i 15.4-1,5 Inadvertent Boron CN-TAS-03-59 Rev 0 No non-editorial changes to FSAR~ .~ . . . Only editorial changes to this Editorial . . . .^ . .. .
Dilution Reference Attachment 1 to Section 15 .4 .1 .5. section (i .e ., change to a table Letter W3F1-2004-0061 The inadvertent boron dilution analysis is number) .
(RAI Q&R 15) performed to provide values for the Boron LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 Dilution Alarm and, when the alarm is inoperable, required boron measurement LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 surveillance frequencies in the COLR, which ensure that adequate time remains for the operators to take corrective action .
The existing analysis has identified combinations of Inverse; Boron Worth (IBWs) and Critical Boron Concentrations (CBCs) which support the current E setpoints and surveillance frequencies .
The reload process checks actual core designs against these combinations for verification of the setpoints .
As the increase in rated thermal power has not affected the RCS volume or the charging pump capacity, the existing analysis remains valid .
.... .~ .~ _.
15 .4 .1 .6 Startup of an- CN-TAS-03-18 Rev 1 No non-editor¬ al changes_.to .FSAR Only^. editorial changes to this ..~ . .~..W. Editorial Inactive RCP Reference Attachment 1 to Section 15 .4,1 .6 section (i .e ., deletion of reference Modes 3, 4 or 5 Letter W3F1-2004-0061 With less than 4 RCPs running the core is to specific cycle analysis) .
with all CEAs on subcritical . The maximum temperature LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 the Bottom differentials between the steam generator LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 and the primary system for which an inactive reactor coolant pump may be LI-101-01, Rev . 5
.. ~. . .. . . . . .
met 4~ d~ ~ ~R ~ c ons
~~..~~~ .
~AR
~ .
o R ~~a(#
~~_~~~ .~.~
/~kPU
,~
te e%
~ ~ ~/mom
~~~
caEumlbn@>~ imam, ~m@ @~anpa~ke& $e~ ~0S ~v_
~AR ~@~ a
. .~ ~m~ t ~
on
. ~. . . . j~ . . .~ ~_~~ ~~~r~~k~dam bth~~
~~~. ~..
i<<mGeaUk $e~~p_mHmm
.mew &9di >>s nm~h F~ R }
__ _ ~m~ is v m .
~Sk~7~ ~ ~~~~~~~\\~2 \<<<< %~ \~~5o&m ~vl ~ Gamy %F~R sdm SaJ 7 ~ Wmgy ~q&
/,akske ~mm<<e&!!<<h_M~m ~diamdb~4R~&m ;s:t<<
~mrw~ ~gmbmR ~$e~ bm~~eac~ dd@~ Gv6 e
~~~5m%%~vl mem~e mm a>>iq me mm A_r
' iG@m a~ m<<a~nmaG~
de#n+m mdQAGona mmp~m
~~ e~ ~ ~+meam~ m MPwm
~h CPC pa &ate ~aap m~ad
~m249%45 e~ k %emlA_mAG l %Paumabe W~ _nd merc r
~<<<<o me<<<<<<k$q mnb~k#
'recPC&9<<Guekcd&~_r uR~ .my me @sRdi as n '
e~ .>> qg. j
' /h~~6gaqmuB+u6k <<
- mrNE~R~am~s*tT j\\\}~~ ~ / \km~ m ~ C~@~-w~ /mom .~\~ R~Gm
- ~~m~q/~~ ~/~R~ amp*~~a~ ~ /~~m
~~<<im aaFmi cN~ FSCATRSO%B ,~ imda ~eew, S d $eF~ % mmkymv k m ~<<wi o a l
- ~ mmmyi~ an ~~~S$£m,~v~ ~+~mtm_ k+r Gamw &w : meF~ % k~ mtmmek~&
§mPe<<r~s~, %~~ ad Gum m~ e dame>~ m Waq~ @#,%mead Gze
~~T~~g~% ~v4 ~A m << mygmx~hG§yea mmGrma9<<~~ m m6em + .
C~~lr~sGama . me~~&~6G~mm aC~~lr
. ~ ~~~ . . ~ _ . .. . . _~ ~ ~. . . ~ . ~~ ~s .mame.
~.... .
x£4 2 ~ +/-~ /~ ~ \ C/~Gon CNA~ $/~~~ ~~ /o <<+eoRb mAdeb~ m ~ ~/ dame ae m+\/~6 ~+.m ~uw
} ~ ~%~ y~ C%~,! asemHyd~)e Gm qem ma~yG EeU~ Rads4~ap~h ;~ A ~Gm
~%~ ymglK RA4 ;ba9q Gm7y~smd<<umemth ~~ ~ J~h +am&ad~ meaiwk bah ;H:sKm~
~P~mmEPURURSdw~)~+#k~ m Ae~<<mam h U+~_rE3~8 ~umn7 m%gby }~ Rap_k
` %~ ,
Cdm<<m6~kC~
r~im~b7Uemm+~m
~ah~m C~ EC % CEO S b l Gma@me<<+~muse##+
a meNS~ ;
~&<< t7 z4%% t~ ~~~~h~ //~~ _. /~~So e~a~ ~~ ~ S(/~\~/ t~~ G ridb pe +/-mom &am mmmd~ $e ~m.m ~~w LQSmt~wS
Page 18 of 83
~_ .3._ ._ .._. .
Table Affected F SAR Sections Supporting Nature of Changes Marie to the Calculation(s) 1 Remarks FSAR Docurnent(s)
Volume Control CN-TAS-03-10, Rev . 0 indicate that the section was not revised EPU LAR and specifically the 'Form Section System (CVCS) Reference Attachment 1 to for power uprate and that the underlying sections andfor tables listed in the H .A.5 ({ .e .,
Malfunction Letter W3171-20040061 conclusion for acceptability are not Supporting EPU FUR Section(s) idependent on affected . column of this table . fAR approval)
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 The following statement was added to Section 15 .5 .1 .1 :
The Chemical and Volume Control System Malfunction was not revised for power uprate . Although the timing of event will be slightly different for power uprate, the underlying conclusions of acceptability are not affected, The FSAR presentation for this event assumes that the core is initially at full power . The analysis accounts for a reduction in charging flow temperature due to the imbalance of charging and letdown . Power increases minimally due to the resulting cooldown . The results of the AOR would be insensitive to the MTC used (---3 .5 x 10-4 Apl°F value was used as compared to the power uprate limit of -
4 .2 x 10-4 apl°F). The transient result would not be significantly affected by the 3716 MWth power uprate . The results should be insensitive to the high pressurizer pressure trip setpoint because trip occurs shortly after the system goes water solid . The sequence of events and results will remain applicable for the power uprate so long as the 44 gpm per pump charging flow and 29 gp ¬n letdown flow used are preserved . The event timing documented in the FSAR was based on a maximum pressurzer spray flow of 375 gpm and would be insignificantly affected by an increase in pressurizer spray flow because full flow was not achieved . The analysis remains valid for up to 1000 plugged steam generator tubes .
LI-101-01, Rev . 5
Table I Affected FSAR Sections IT 4 Supporting EPU Supporting FSAR Nature of Changes Made t( Review PUR Section(s) Event Calculation(s) Remarks - Category Section FSAR Docurnent(s)
Additionally, a change to Tables 15 .5-1 and 15 .5-2 to reflect that the analysis was not revised for power uprate .
15,5 .1 .2 2 .13 .5 .1 .2 ~i-na~'ve en CINIJAS030Rev No changes ~O FSAR Section 15 .5_1 .2 No chang NIA Emergency Core Reference Attachment 1 to This event is no more adverse than the Cooling Actuation Letter VV3FI-2004-0061 CVGS malfunction, UFSAR Section LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 15 .5 .1 .1 . The CVCS malfunction includes a coolant addition equal to or greater than the inadvertent operation of the ECCS .
There is no change to the safety injection system as a result of the increase in rated Thermal power . The FSAR discusses how the cutoff pressure of the safety injection system is below operating system pressures . Therefore the safety injection system would be incapable of actually discharging to the RCS even if an inadvertent actuation were to occur . This assessment remains valid at the uprated conditions .
15 .5 .2 .1 2 .13 .5 .2 .1 CVCS CN-TAS-03-18 Rev 1 changes to FSA Section o changes NIA Malfunction with Reference Attachment I to The UFSAR presentation for this event SAF Letter VV3FI-2004-0061 assumes that the core is initially at full LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 power, The historical analysis accounts for a reduction in charging flow temperature due to the imbalance of charging and letdown, including the possibility of letdown flow isolation .
Power increases minimally due to the resulting cooldown . The results of the
'AOR would be insensitive to the MTC used because a highly negative -3,5 x 10-4 Ap/'F value was used (as compared to the power uprate limit of -4 .2 x 10-4 Ap/'F) . The transient results are not significantly affected by the 3716 MWth power uprale . The results are insensitive to the high pressurizer pressure trip setpoint because trip occurs shortly after the systemgoes solid . The sequence of . . . . . . .... ............. . .. ..
LI-104M, Rev . 5
~:9kEwk~FOR~
...~~.~~~.~~ ~~ ~ . .. . . . . . . . . . . . ..
~~ men
~~~~.~ ~~~~p ~g ~~l~~AR~~~>> ~ ~~~
BAR ~~°~9~~ ~~~jd/~~~~~~o$e'~<<~/~
PUR ~~~W~ ~eG cmmQlb%4Z smalls FA R ~#~ >
~Am~~
~~~~~ e~>>md>>m6 aummmnapp~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ _
f~~ruPUem§q+he~7m pry mp G<<gi +wad A g~
G~~ +wa+ammeer¢
~%m7$egmlta9dm~~ah
~h U~&R ~s~ mdonamaWum pr m#ea~y+wa~sg~ aW sue<<msn~a#yA~k&+
a~ Rempmau&+/- +ay +_
<<mmeU~+w~amla+/-~ k.
Tk ~&R~ casna mm GeM G :
- ~ u+du~n~>>~ g4_ug GW %r
%eR<<gGe>>9 &ebme aa&er *adu#m 7 kdmmm cGdG 4mpaAmw ~e~ _r um~ ~@4dm~d++e maim
- mp ap qy mrme~ r mmb@~Gew a ~i+/- me Pr m&e mug <<
.mm~ bk.TWrom~w <<any <<mth
\~ R G m!~~ k & me 9~ r 7 A6 " .
,&EZl +/-,aw14 S~ BPM~ 7 cm~s<<32 ~vo T eo§~ ~ a me~~a nB+ 5mw ~eWm7&am mm~ b me ~q~ ~u w eee# ~ m~y<<J>>~v2 memo<< m~ a~ &~ S me>> E~ ~RmdB<<c ep~h ~ r~ 6m O~ we ~ ~~ymglfRv4 am~A&~syd<<umem~wi~a M mamam~zr%~~sns db~h H : sKw
~ aim meUa6m mamma Sm&mm~UeUR~&m%) u<<m+m m i<<m+eeUk~~r~m #y ~umnam&bhy ~~Ra+r m 2~ 2a2em~~
k aage9 meC~ ~ m&,aW ae/c i Jamee +gmi m~ .
T~ mAd2lGa+m dam<<ru6 ami<<e#eb~h >>dai ama
<<ukaR(~ m mab~~ A~lm ~m
(~2 mdwa ~~dmm ~~Rt ~ '
ga ~~mnm9eme&~ ~Nn me<<7ea Gs~ :ER&&2m6~ A-mommu~ skier 6a ~ ; '
. _. _ . ~ . . ~ .~~~ . ~ mnmq+<<e 6~eMC~~tr~6
. ~ .~ . . . ~. . . .~~ . . . .
y~ \~~ ~ymm~mUm~CNJ~<<~~ A!~ ~k A\dm w~ ~~ <<mU/~~e~\R\<<+~ /~\ q~\<< ;m.m~uw LdS$tR~ s
. ~~~~~~.~~~.
R SpP~mgE~~~~~ ~~om~ .~~~~mum<<c~~~~~~jm/^~oA~w~
UR ~~a%% ~~! Cap mAonb}~ ~ mR~ BAR Ck~ oR
~~on ~cum_<)
/~~~p~~!!~ 2 }&Ry~~ ~~~~~~ xJm&2~~ 2 ate! m 7Gr )w h~ ~~G6 ~~rt yenik~!J&y~~~~F~~G3~ ~
4% aaQ2m£ %elm ~~~5<<<<4K~v4 %009 >>§A&~&% mm_mhe AW~~lm 7GTS and %:SKS m%> ~ W#aemebl~aim damq: Pre~dbemm#hthm %+m+4m CGge~ m CEOC % C~~ << be ak& ~R +Kam}
/~ 9 Q_~lm~ ~ + SGT ~hmla m<<ur w
&+~>>ebmm<<a9w~lm ~9<<~s%~~%
pGmmGd>> b me up % Suw~i ~%E37!
~m~ md6~Nq 3 meMes E ~TRa~ #a wh p% m<<uAm~ 6 a ~!! ;y T~ Wp G y meEPU mm6ah m ~~cDNRR PeA~ ame '
~#m y m~ mum RCS ma58 ~+,SuG~an ew 1z2
\rmmnm6~ me~Rge~ . c SGT ~hacmo~m~al a0~m~~r
- ~d6gi~~eq+m<<
- Caa .suW~ i lfEaw% ~
l >>w ads r AW~hl~h ~CTR ;
~hammuA4~>><<~ge '
- ~ _rte amenmmq mmko U~
~adwgia~maG+<<<<,
~BrmK~ymeSOSR~B
' mcurm~wa~e6~~r
~ar aa~y k. ~ ammo me wmkow~mammurm~a~
, a Awe~~r~;+~~ dab '
M me m&meDNBR AAra<<e
~~m~s+~%k.pewemm
~smm~dSGTR~ha CmGrm~a<<~syP~r mdmmm<<md+ aw+>> ,
T<< Ga9mammmmd&~h EPU~ Ra<< 9c eyyme
~+Gmaad~ bb~ R!k bah
, ?~ %q ~ eens
_ _~~\~~~~~~~~ .. _ _ ~~ umna mG Q~l .
45 .a~ ~ \S.z3 ~~ Ca ~~~ ~~\ ~~~ ~~ jm/\mp, a ~~ \\ y7\\/\G `~t>>a~~ ~~m\~'m\~~A
~~dQq~ ! HER
_ ~~mgmcm ;
4\E\~~ \~2;~~~~ ~ ~9~ ~k ~~ /~0~~\/~vo ~ \~ ~gmw c\ Cmw~ Alem ~ A~~k<< Gs ~\ gy m '+ .q ~ _>
(~ ~ SCOPS ~CA ~~O~~ J7~v2 (~ CS AAra<<eam~y & eye G&cym+r ~ me ~A ~4m
- +_~Uk m~ ~mm bah ~~ ~U~ Rbp~ em& memamsH
- sp>>.
uam3t~ws
_ . . ..-~ ..-.. .____- ... .__ ..__._. .. .-_ . ._-. ~ .. .__ . .___-_._._ . ..-... .__ _ ___ .._ .__. ._ .___ .._ ._ . ._ ...__m. ..._ _ . _ .._ ._~. _ ._, . ..
Supporting EPU -_ Supporting
FSAR PUR Section(s) + Nature of Changes Made to the 50 .59 Review Event Calculation(s)1 Remarks Section FSAR Category Docurnent(s) acceptance criteria for light water nuclear - and/or tables listed in the Idepenoenton power reactors, 10CFR50 .46, for Supporting EPU PUR Section(s) LAR approval)
Waterford 3 at the power uprate rated column of this table) or by the and editorial .
core power of 3716 MWt (3735 MWt listed calculation (CN-TAS-02-58) including a 0 .5% power measurement which was performed to support uncertainty) . Analyses were performed this section and the PUR, and for a spectrum of large-break (ass-of- therefore implicitly covered by the coolant accidents (LOCAs) . FSAR EPU LAR . Additionally, there are ~,
Section 15 .6 .3 .3 .3 .1 describe the ECCS various editorial changes in this performance analysis for Waterford 3 . section such as deletion to specific cycle evaluations, changing of references from Combustion Engineering to Westinghouse, spelling out CE as I,
... . . . .. ..... . .... ... .~ Combustion Engineering, etc .
Z 15 .6 .3 .3 .3 .2 ..W3F1-2004-Q052 ` Smail Break GN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 An Emergency Core Coating System The changes in this section are !50 .59 Review Attach 5, Section CA LTR-OA-04-77 Rev 2 (ECGS) performance analysis covered by the EPU LAR Form Section 2 .12 .4 ,dernonstrated conformance to the ECCS (specifically the sections and/or II,A .5 (i .e .,
(LOCA SCOPE) acceptance criteria for light water nuclear tables listed in the Supporting ~d ¬ pendent on power reactors, 10CFR50 .46, for EPU PUR Section(s) column of j LAR approval)
Waterford 3 at the power uprate rates! this table) . land editorial .
core power of 3716 MWt (3735 MWt Additionally, there are various including a 0 .5% power measurement editorial changes in this section uncertainty) . Analyses were performed such as changing of references for a spectrum of small-break loss-of- from Combustion Engineering to coolant accidents (LOGAs) . FSAR I Westinghouse, differentiating Section 15,6.3 .3 .3 .2 describes the ECCS Combustion Engineering scope of j performance analysis far Waterford 3 . analysis, renumbering table and figure numbers, correcting typo to 6 .3 .3 .3 .1 on page 156 23 et,1 15 .6 .3-4 2 .13 .6 .3 .4 and - ~Pressurizer LTR-OA-03-54, Rev . 1 LT No technical change to 15 .6 .3 .4 /not ~The changes in this section are 150 .59 Review 2 .12 .6 Safety Valve Lift R-OA-04-77 Rev 2 limiting location far LOCA}, covered by the EPU LAR Farm Section (LOCH SCOPE) The primary conclusion of the FSAR (specifically the sections and/or ' II .A .5 (i .e .,
analysis is that the inadvertent opening of tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on a pressurizer safety valve LOCA is 'PUR Section(s) column of this LAR approval) bounded by a SBLOCA in the pump table) . land editorial, discharge leg . This FSAR analysis conclusion is independent of care power leve l .
U-101-0 1, Rev . 5
TaWe I Affected FEAR Sections Supporting El Supporting FSAR Nature of Changes Made to tf 50 .59 Review PUR Sections) Event Calculation(s) Remarks Section FSAR Category Document(s)
Section 15 .6 .3,4 was revised to indicate that the analysis was evaluated for EPU not impact but was reanalyzed .
15,7 .3 .4 2 .13 .7 .3.4 Fuel-Handling N/A No changes to FSAR Section 15,7 .3 .4 No changes 1 NhA Accident (FHA) LTR-RCPL-04-32, Rev 0 KA31 2 .13_7 .3 .5 Spent Fuel Cask N/A No changes to FSAR Section 15 .7 .3 .5 No changes N/A Drop Accidents LTR-RCPL-04-32, Rev 0 15 .8 2 .13,8 ATWS NIA No changes to FSAR Section 15 .8 No changes NhA LTR-RCPL-04-32, Rev 0 15 .9 .1 .1 2 .13 .91 .1 Asymmetric CN-TAS-02-78 Rev 0 The objective of the asymmetric stearn The changes are covered by the 50.59 Review Steam Generator LTR-RCPL-04-32 , Rev 0 generator transient (ASGT) analysis was EPU LAIR and specifically the Form Section LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 to demonstrate that the ASGT event does sections and/or tables listed in the lLA.5 (i .e .,
not violate the DNBR and LHR SAFDLs Supporting EPU PUR Section(s) idependenton
!for Waterford 3 with power uprate at 3716 column of this table . LAR approval)
MWt . The analysis was performed for the power uprate to evaluate the impact cf; z ' ~ Change in most negative moderator temperature coefficient (MTC) from -
-4 4 .Oxl0ApPF to 4 .2x10 4 rip/°F Use of CENTS rather than CESEC Increase in rated thermal power A decrease in the CPC differential cold leg temperature trip setpoint from 18*F to 1VF .
Appendix A N/A iSupplemental N/A Historical Information, no changes N/A N/A Information for require?
Chapter 15 in
=Response to Waterford 3 (NUREG-0787)
Open Items 8 through I I ntainment NIA This appendix is Dose related and not NIA NIA
'Leakage and I within scope of this ER . Ref Dose Calculation_ W3000006000
~Madels LI-101-0 1, Rev, 5
_ Affected FSAR Sect ions
~.~ .
Supporting EPU -Supporting ...
PUR Section(s) 1 Nature of Changes Made to the ' 50 .59 Review Event Calcporti(s)I Remarks FSAR Category Document(s)
[Supplemental This appendix is deleted . The subject is The changes are covered by the 1 50 .59 Review I Informafon for
,Chapter 15 in encompassed by the information contained in sections 15 .1 .3,1 and EPU LAR and specifically the Form Section sections and/or tables listed in the , II .A .5 (i .e .,
Response to 15.1 .3 .3 for Main Steam Line Break . Supporting EPU PUR Section(s) ' dependent on Waterford 3 column of this table . LAR approval)
Supplement No . 1 Confirmatory Items 15 .3 .1 and Appendix This D NIA i Supplemental N/A~ appendix deleted, Cycle specific The changes are covered bymthe~ .~ 50 .59 Review^
Cycfe Specific information has been replaced by EPU EPU LAR and specifically the Form Section Event Analyses generated analysis and documented in sections and/or tables listed in the i Il .A .5 (i .e .,
appropriate FSAR Chapter 15 Sections . Supporting EPU PUR Section(s) dependent on column of this table, ; LAR approval)
Notes,W_ : 1 . Attachment 5 to Letter W3F1-2003-0074, Waterford 3 Extended Power Uprate Report . untess otherwise noted .
,_, ------ ~. ._ . . _ . .~_ ..-.... ..__.- . .._,__
~ .. . ~ ~_. .._~
sable 2 Affected FSAR Tables Table Supporting EPU Nature of Supporting Calculation/Document(s) 50 .59 Review Category No . PUR Table' Cha ges Made to the FSAR 15.0- 1 No Change N/A No Change 15 .0- 2 __ No Change NIA No Change N/A
._.~ ..-
15 .0-_3 2 .13 .0-3 LTR-TAS-04-119,~Rev 4 ...~~ - The changes are overed by the E.PU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section IIA .5 (i .e .,
specifically the ta les listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table colu n of this table .
- .. . ...... . . .. . . .. . . .19.... _ (i .e ..,
115 .0- 4 Z13~ .0-2 EC -S03-001 (DR-N 03-.1 D) a . The majority of the changes are covered by the EPU 50 .59 Review Form Section If .A .5 L R-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 LAR and specifically the tables listed in the dependent on L .AR approval)
Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table .
See b below for a change not explicitly addressed in the EPU LAR, b . The entry of 1 .65 for Radial 1-pin peaking factor ; FR (with uncertainty) in the Table was not in the equivalent PUP Table, however, this entry is supported by the listed calculation (Groundrules Calculation) which states : "For Power Uprate, a 1 .65 maximum radialkea. king factor will be LI-101-01, Rev . 5
50 .59 REVIEW FORM Page 25 of 83 Table 2 Affected FSAR Tables Table Supporting EAU Nature of Supporting Calculation/Document(s) 50,59 Review Category No . FUR Table Changes Madeto the FSAR assumed : this is the specified maxim urn radial peaking factor assumed in radiological analyses .
More restrictive assumptions on radial peaking may be included in Westinghouse calculations (e .g ., Fuel Management Guidelines) and are tracked as part of the PAC Assessment process," The values reported in the PUR are more conservative than 1 .65 which is consistent with the groundruies, and therefore implicitly covered by the EPU LAR .
W- 1 2 .13 .1 .1 .3-2 CN-TAS-02-96 Rev 0 Table 7 .3 .1 .1,3-2 a . The majority of the changes are covered by the EPU 5039 Review Form Section li .A .5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 LAR and specifically the tables listed in the dependent on LAR approval)
Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table .
See b below for those changes not explicitly addressed in the EPU LAR .
b . Several entries (tunes 27 .4, 160 .5, 179 .1, 257 .0, 350 .2, 1000 .0 seconds) in the Table were not in the equivalent PUR Table, however, these entries are supported by the listed calculation which is the basis for the rest of the table, and therefore implicitly covered by the EPU LAR .
151-2 1131 .13-1 CN-TAS-02-96 Rev 0 Table 7 .3 .1 .1 .3-1 a The majority of the changes are covered by the 50 .59 Review Form Section 11,A .5 (i .e . ,
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the dependent on LAR approval)
Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table .
See b below for those changes not explicitly addressed in the EPU LAR, b, One entry (reactor regulating system) in the Table was not in the equivalent PUR Table, however, this entry is supported by the listed calculation which is the basis for the rest of the table, and therefore implicitly covered by the EPU LAR .
111-3 2,13 .1 .1 .4-2 CN-TAS-02-87 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section H .A .5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the tables listed A Me Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table 151-4 2 .13 .1 .1 .4 -1 CN-TAS-02-87 Rev I a . The majority of the changes are covered by the 50,59 Review Form Section H .A .5 (Le-,
UR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the dependent on L AR approval)
Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table .
See b below for those changes not explicitly addressed in the EPU LAR .
b . One entry (total nuclear heat flux factor) in the
. ..... - ----- . .... . ----- --- Table was not in-..the. equivalent PUR Table, I .. . - . I " .. .. "-, . ..' .. .... ...... . . .
1-1-101-01, Rev . 5
Table 2 Affected FSAR Tables Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
Changes Made to the FSAR however, this entry is supported by the listed calculation which is basis for the rest of the table, and therefore implicitly covered by the EPU LAR .
Reference ER-W3-2004-0276-000 Dose Scope
_ ~._.~ 7_Reference E_R-W3 2004-0276-0(30 Dose Scope Dose Scope ._.- .~~_~_ Rference 1=R-W3-2004-0276-000 _ NIA
.._ .._ 11 213 .1 .2 .3-3 C AS 2 33 Re Table .3 1 .2 .3-3 ~ a . The majority of the changes are covered by the 50 .59 Rev1ew 1Form 1Sectian 11f A .5 {Le.,^.
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the dependent on LAR approval)
Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table .
See b below for those changes not explicitly addressed in the EPU LAR .
b . One entry (steam generator safety valves open) in the Table was not in the equivalent PUR Table, however, this entry is supported by the fisted calculation which is basis for the rest of the table, and therefore implicitly covered by the EPU LAR .
LTR-TAS-04 .1.19, Rev 4 _ Table was defeted in the new analysis 50 .594Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e ., .
dependent on LAR approval)
.._ ~ ..
CN-1 AS-02-33 Rev 1 Table 7 .11 .2,3-2 a. The majority of the changes are covered by the ' . 50.59 Review Form Section ii .A .5 (i .e .,
R-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 EPU LAR and specifically the fables listed in the dependent on LAR approval)
Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table .
Sera b below for those changes not explicitly addressed in the EPU LAR,
- b. One entry (steam generator safety valves open) in the Table was not in the equivalent PUR Table, however, this entry is supported by the listed calculation which is basis for the rest of the table, and therefore implicitly covered by the EPU LAR. ....__
15 .1- 9A ~ Was 15 .1-9, Editorial ° This table is Dose related and not within f Only editorial changes to this tabfe(i .e ., change to a- Editorial ~~
Change scope of this ER . table number) . Reference ER-W3-2004-0276-000 15 .1- 10 1 2 .13 .1 .2 .3-1 1 CN-TAS-02-33 Rev 1 Table 7,3 .1 .2 .3-1 a . The majority of the changes are covered by the . 50 .59 Review Form Section ILA .5 (i .e .,
LT R-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the dependent on LAR approval)
Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table .
See b below for those changes not explicitly addressed fn the EPU LAR.
b . Two entries (initial SC water level, FTC) in Table were not in equivalent PUR Table, however, these entries are supported by the listed calculation whic h is th e basis for the rest of the table, and t_1-101-01, Rev . 5
Page 27 of 83 Table 2 Affected t; SAFt Tables Nature of Supporting CalculationlDocurnent(s)
Changes Made to the FSAR therefore implicitly covered by the EPU LAR .
This table is dose related and not within Only editorial changes to this table (i .e ., change to a Editorial scope of this ER . table number) . Reference ER-W3-2004-0276-000 CN-TAS-03-9 Rev 0 Table 7 .3 .1 .2 .4-3 The changes an covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section H .A .5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 1 specifically the tables listed A he Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
- --- ------- PUR Table column . . ... .. of this table .
This table 4 Dose related and not within Only edhoriM changes to this table OR, Bane to a Editorial Change scope of this ER . table number) . Reference ER-W3-2004-0276-000 213.1-2,4-1 CN-TAS-03-9 Rev 0 Table 70 1 1A q The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 {iR, LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent an LAR approval}
PUR Table column of this table_
2.13 .1-3 .1-5 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev I Table 2 .13,1 .3 .1-5 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section O .A .5
"' - - I -------- --
specTcally the tables hod K he Supporting EPU (iR_
!mI'R-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 dependent or) LAR approval) to W3FI-2004-0096) FUR Table column of this table .
2 .13,1 .3 .'t0 CNJAST207 Rev I Table 2A31aU6 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and eV e w-
"'lr ~o Section M A A (Revised per Attach I LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the tables hod A Me Supporting EPU dependent ori LAR approval)
W3F1-2004-0096) PUR Table column of this table .
Was 15 .1-14, EditorjaU This table 3 Owe related and not within Only editorial changes to this table (i .e ., change to a Editorial Change scope of this ER . table number), Reference ER-W3-2004-0276-000 2ATIAl-7 CN -TAS-02-97 Rev I Table 2 .13 .1 .3 .3-7 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section H .A .5 (i .e .,
(Revised per Attach I LT'R-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F 1 -2004-0096) PUR Table column of this table .
2111011 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev I Table 2 .13 .1,3 .1-8 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section ll .A .5 (i .e .,
(Revised per Attach I LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EF'U dependent on LAR approval) to W3F 1 -2004-0096) FUR Table column of this table .
2 .13 .1 .3 .1-1 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Table 2 .13 .1 .3 .1-1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section H .A.5 (i .e .,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the tables hod A We Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3171-2004-0096) PUR Table column of Mh Able .
Was 15117, Editorial This table is Dose related and not within Only editorial changes to this table (i .e ., change to a Editorial scope of this ER . table number) . Reference ER-W3-2004-0276000 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Table 2 .13 .1 .3 .1-2 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR 50 .59 Review Forrn Section H .A.5 (i .e-,
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the tables listed in the Supportingand EPU dependent on LAR approval)
W~3F1- 2004-0096) PUR Table column of this table .
15 .1- 18A Was 15108, Editorial s Dose related and not within Only editorial changes to this table (i .e ., change io a Editorial Change scope of this ER . I table number), Reference ER-W3-2004-0276-000 1-1401M Rev . 5
50 .59 REVIEW FORM Page 28 of 83 Table 2
Supporting Calculation/Document(s) 50.59 Review Category PUR Table' Changes Made to the FSAR 2 .13,1 .3 .1-3 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Table 213 .1 .3 .1-3 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section H .A .5 (i .e .,
(Revised per Attach I TR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3 F 1 -2004-0096) PUR Table column of It table .
Was 15 .1-99, Editorial This table is Dose related and not within Only editorial changes to this table (i .e ., c hange to a Editorial Change scope of this ER . table number) . Reference ER-W3-2004-0276-000 51- - i6 2 .13 .1 .3-1-4 CN-TAST207 Rev I Table 2111014 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section H .A .5 (i .e .,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev4 specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F1 -2004-0096) PUR Table column of this table .
Was 15 .1-20, Editorial This table is Dose related and not within Only editorial changes to this table (i .e ., change to a Editorial Change scope of this ER . table number) . Reference ER-W3-2004-0276-000 Existing FSAR Table N/A No changes 151-21 Existing FSAR Table LTR-J'AS-04-119, Rev 4 The event for which this table supports is not affected 50 .59 Review Farm `Section ll,A,S (in .,
15 .1-22 by EPU and hence was not reanaQzed . The table was dependent on LAR approval) revised to reflect this and to add clarifying statements in a footnote . Therefore it is implicitly covered by the EPU LAR 2 .13 .1 .3 .3-3 (Revised CN-TAS-03-23 Re .I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
perAttach 5toW3FI- LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev4 specifically the tables listed in the Supporting FPU dependent on LAR approval) 2004-0096) PUR Table column of this table .
CN-TAS-03-23 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section ll .A .5 (i .e .,
I-TR-TAS-D4-119, Rev 4 specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent an LAF't approval)
PUR Table column of this table .
15 .1-25 Existing FSAR Table N/A No technical changes (formatting corrections only} Editorial 95 .1-23, No Change 15 .1- 26 2 .13 .1-13-1 CN-TAS-03-23 Rev I changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section H .A .5 (i .e .,
(Revised per Attach 5 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAIR approval) to W3 F 1-2004-0029 PUR Table column of this table .
15.1- 27 L13A .3,3-2 CN-TAS-0303 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e,,
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU ~ dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table .
152-1 1132 .1,3-2 CN-TAS-02-53 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
L-TR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the tables fisted in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table .
151- 2 2.13.2 .1 .3-y CN-TAS-02-53 Rev 1 The changes am covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the tables listed A the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) 1-11040t Rev . 5
TaWe 2 FSAR _ Affected Tables Supporting Calculation/Document(s) 50 .59 Review Category Changes Made to the FSAR PUR Table column of this table .
CN-TAS-03-3 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section 11,A,5 (i .e_
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR . approval)
FUR Table column of this table .
CN-TAS-03-3 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50-59 Review Form Section IIA,5 (i .e,,
(LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4) specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Table column of this table .
Ddeted ATIR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 Table was deleted in the new analysis 50 .59 Review Form Section JLA,5 (i,e .,
dependent on LAR approval) 1 .1 3 .2 .3 .1-2 CN-TAS-02-30 Rev 0 Table D-2 e changes are covered by he theEPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section ILA,5 (i .e-,
(Revised per Attach 5 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the tables listed h Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3 F 1 -2004-0096) PUR Table column of this table .
2 .13,2 .3 .1-1 CWTASOX30 Rev 0 Table p-I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section ILA .5 (i .e .,
R-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table .
2132aP4 CIA-TAS-02-30 Rev 0 Table 0-4 lh-e --changes The "l----a-re- -covered
- byIyl- theel-E--P--U----L--A--R- - -and 50 .59 Review Form Section WAI (i",
(Revised pei, Attach 5 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3FI-2004-0096) PUR Table column of this table .
50 2 .1 3.2 .3 .1-3 1 CWTAST230 Rev 0 Table D-3 The than are cav.md by t e EP -LAA "!Ai .59 Review Form Section fl .A .5 (i .e.,
(Revised ;)or Attach 5 LI- R-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the tables hod in the Supporting EPU ~ dependent on LAR approval) to W3 F 1-204() PUR Table column of this table .
.1323 .2-2 - N--TAS---
C -03,--3,--R-ev--1-'- The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section fLA,5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-119 , Rev 4 specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Table column of this table .
R-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 Table was deleted in the new analysis 50,59 Review Form Section N .A .5 (Le .,
dependent on LAR approval)
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 Table was deleted in the new analysis 50 .59 Review Form Section H .A .5 (i,e-,
dependent on LAR approval)
CN-TAS-03-3 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A,5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the tables listed W he Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table .
CN-TAS-02-98 Rev 0 Table 7 .3 .3 .2 .1-2 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section ILA .5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F1-2004-(7096) PUR Table column of this table .
2A&W11 CN-TAS-02-98 Rev 0 Table 7 .3.3 .2 .7-1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section HAA (iz .,
LTR-TAS-04119, . Rev 4 specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
L 1-109T1, Rev . 5
Page 30 of 83 Table 2 Affected FSAl2 Tables Table Supporting EPU Nature of Supporting Calculation/Document(s) 50 .59 Review Category No. PUR Table 1.~ . Changes Made to the FSAR
_^
_____ .__ _.__ .`__ _...___..-_ _. _- . . .-_. _._ .~ _ _ _. __.___ _ . .~ _.._ _ .__ __.__..__. ___ ..____ .__ ._ .._ ._ .. ~ .
PUR Table column of this table, 153-3 1133010 CNIAST310 Rev 0 Table 73 .33-2 The changes are covered by the EPU LAIR and 50 .59 Review Form Section ILA .5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-21, Rev I specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table .
153-4 Z11301-1 CNJASONIO Rev 0 Table 73011 The changes are covered by the EPU LAIR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (Le .,
(Revised per Attach 5 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev4 specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F 1 -2004-0096) PUR Table column of this table .
.. . .....4a 53- .--
. -DeNed
- .. . . . .. .. . . LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 Table was deleted in the .... . .new
- "" -analysis
. . . . ... - ------- -- ---- 50 .59 Review Form- ----- - Section .II...A
. .. .5
(i .e .,
dependent on LAR approval) 15 .3- 4b Previously Deleted N/A N/A N/A 15 .3- 5 Previously Deleted - ------- -------- NIA N/A N/A 15 .3- 5a Previously Deleted N/A N/A N/A 15 .3-6 Previously Deleted NIA NhA N hA 151- 7 Dde&d, Replaced by LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 Table was replaced by Table 15 .3-4 in the new 50 .59 Review Form Section 0,A.5 (Le-,
new TaNe I 3-4 a anaysis . dependent on LAR approval) 15A- 1 113A,1 .1-2 GN-TAS-02-70 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section fl .A .5 (j,e .,
LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specTically the tables 11sted in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table .
15A- 2 11111 .1-1 CN-TAS-02-70 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section fI .A.5 (j,e" LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the taWes listed in the. Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table .
15A- 3 113A :120 CN-TAS-02-70 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form SectOn II .A.5 In, L .TR-I"AS-04-119, Rev 4 specificaMy the tables hhd 4 Me Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table .
15A- 4 113AA01 CNAAS0240 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section fl .A .5 (j .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table .
15A- 5 Z13AA30 CN-TAS-02 55 Rev 0 Table 7,3 .4 . 1 .3- re cove--r-
."T-hle ch-Ong-e-s-a- ed-'Il by the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 spedficalfy the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Table column of this table .
154-6 Z13A,VXI CPVTAS0205 Rev 0 Table 7 .3 .4,1 .3-1 The changes are covered by Me EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section -(j .e . '- ]
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specToalty the tables 40d A We Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval}
PUR Table column of this table .
15A- 7 Z 114 .1 AVI CN-TAS-02-92 Rev 0 App D Table D-1 He changes am covered by Me EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i,e,,
(Revised per Attach 5 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specificaily the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table conlumn of tWs tab!
LAW10L Rev 5
Table 2 Affected FSAR Tab les Nature of No . PIIR Table' I Supporting CalculationlDocument(s) Ch ange s Made to the FSAR T to W3F1-2004-0096)
....~.
2 .1 ;3 .4 .1 .4-2 ~~____ CN-TAS-02-92 Rev0 F App D Table D-2 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e_
LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU , dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table .
15 .4-9 Deleted With the new analysis for section 15 .4 there .was one ^ 50 .59 Review Form ~Section ll .A_5 (i.e .,,
less table than with the original analysis . dependent on LAR approval)
Previously Deleted . .., N'A , ...-. N/A N/A Original Table 15_4-11 NIA Only editorial changes to this table (i .e ., change to a Editorial .... -------
Deleted In FSAR table number) .
Revision 13 Original Table 15 .4-17 changed to 75 .4-1 15_4 .. 12 Original Table 15 .4- 7 Only editorial changes to this table (i .e,, change to a Editorial changed to 15 .4-12 fahtn nE,mhr r1 15 .4- 13 0rigi~ial TabIe .. .15A- 8 Only editorial changes to this table (i .e ., change to a changed to 15 .4-13 ble
, number)
-. ... ~_,_, .- . .____- .. . _ . . ._- ..___ ...__ ._ ~ .. .-_ . .. ._ . ... .._ . . .. . .-}' .. .._. ... .... ....... .._ ... ._ _ . .._.__ .. . _.._. ...__....._ ~.. ...__. .. .___
15 .4- ....14 2_13A .3 .2-9 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 1 50,59 Review Form Section fI .A.5 (i .e .,
specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent can LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table .
CN-TA_S=.. 3-._ _ ._3.__ .- -
15 .4- 1,5 213A31-2 0 8 Rev a . The majority of the changes are covered by the 50 .59 Review Form Section H .A .5 (i .e .,.,
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 EPL1 LAR and specifically the tables listed in the dependent on LAR approval)
Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table .
See b below for those changes not explicitly addressed in the EPU LAR_
b . The value for Maximum RCS pressure is found in the listed calculation (CN-TAS-03-8) which is the basis for the rest of the table, and therefore implicitly covered by the EPU LAR 3.. - ----- ------- - --- ----
CN-TAS-03-8 Rev ' a . The majority of the changes are covered by the _ .50 .59 Review Form Section 1f .A .5 (i,e_
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the dependent on LAR approval)
Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table .
See b below for those changes not explicitly addressed in the EPU LAR .
b . The values for CPCS VOPT setpoint and CPCS VOP Total response time are not found in the corresponding PUR table, however, they are found in the fisted calculation (CN-TAS-03-8) which is the basis for the rest of the tabl e, and therefore LI-101-01, Rev . 5
Table 2 Affected FSAR Tables Table Supporting EPU Nature of Supporting Calculation/Document(s) 50 .59 Review Category No . PUR Table' Changes Made to the FSAR implicitly covered by the EPU LAR.
15A- 17 Z13A .3 .2-4 CN-TAS-03-8 Rev 3 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section ILA .S (i.e .,
(Revised per Attach 5 LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the tables listed h the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F 1 -2004-0096) PUR Table column of this table .
(Original 15 .4-17 Changed to 15 .4-11, Editorial Change) 15 .4- 18 2 .13 .4,12-5 CN-TAS-03-8 Rev 3 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section ILA .S (i .e .,
L.TR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the taWes listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Table column of this table .
._. .1 table 15 .4 19 Was 15 .4. 110orkl This 0 Dwe related and not within For the scope of this ER, the only changes made to Editorial Change scope of this ER . Me table were editorial, i .e ., changed table number.
Reference ER-VV3-2004-0276-000 151- 1 N/A ~ CN-TAS-03-18 Rev 1 The table is being revised to indicate that the analysis 50,59 Review Form Section 11,A .5 (i.,
.e CN-TAS-03-10, Rev . 0 is not being revised . See discussion for Section dependent on LAR approval) lilail, . ......
.. . . . .... ... ..... . . LTR-TAS-04-119 . Rev 4 15 .5-2 N/A CN-TAS-03-18 Rev 1 The table is being revised to rndicate that the analysis 50 .59 Review Form Section ILA .S (i .e.,
CN-TAS-03-10, Rev, 0 is not being revised . See., discussion for Section dependent an LAR approval)
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 Tilalzl, 1
150-1 ZYWA-2 CN-TAS-02-41 Rev 0 Table 7,3 .6 .3 .1-1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table .
I 50 .59 Review Form Section 11A .5 (i .e .,
, dependent on LAR approval) 151- 2 ZUB .&Ild CWTAST241 Rev 0 Table 7 .3 .6 .3 .1-2 a The majority of the changes are covered by the 50 .59 Review Form Section ILA .S (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the dependent on LAR approval)
Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table .
See b below for those changes not explicitly addressed in the EPU LAR .
b- The values for Core outlet coolant temperature and~
Secondary relief valve setpoint are not found in the corresponding PUR table, however, they are found in the listed calculation (CN-TAS-02-41) which is the basis for the rest of the table, and therefore implicitly covered by the EPU LAR .
15.6-3 Dose Scope This table is Dose related and not within Reference ER-W3-2004-0276-000 NIA scope of this ER, 151-4 1131320 CN-TA&011 5 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section ILA .S (i .e .,
Revised perAttach4 specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
I-MAL Rev. 5
50 .59 REVIEW FORM Table 2 Affected. FSAR T ables
.. . _ ... ~_ __r___ ._ . . .....-_ _
Table Supporting EPU ature of Supporking Caleula 1. r%ocurnen() t 50.59 Review Category abln lTabl o
~
Changes Made to the FSAR to W3F1-2004-0096) LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 PUR Table column of this table .
15 .6-4, E or a h1s tab e is Dose related and not within For the scope of this ER, the only changes made . ... Editorial °. ... ..
Change scope of this ER . table were editorial, i .e ., changed table numbertohe to 15 .6-4A to accommodate new Table 15 .6-4 . Reference ER-W3-2004-0276-000 2 .13 .6 .3 .2-1 N-TAS-03-15 Rev 1 a . The majority of the changes are covered by the .... .50 .59 Review Form Section ll .A .5 (i .e .,
(Revised per Attach 4 LTR-TAS-114-119, Rev 4 EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the dependent on LAR approval) to W3F1-2004-0096) Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table .
See b below for those changes not explicitly addressed in the EPU LAR .
b . The value for Tolerance on MSSV Setpoint is not found in the corresponding FUR table, however, it is found in the listed calculation (CN-TAS-03-15) which is the basis for the rest of the table, and therefore implicitly covered by the EPU LAR, This table is Dose related and not within ...^ ._ . .. . Reference ER-W3-2004-0276-000 N/A scope o ¬ this ER . _. ._ .. ...__ - f_. .__ .~~....__ .._~m.. ...__ .
eferenceER-W3-2004-0276-ODD
^
Previously Deleted NIA NIA ? N/A
_. -- - ... . . .._. ---11111 1111---1.1111 _ _. _ __ . . .. .
Deleted CN TAS 03 15 Rev 1 ` _ ... .... . With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were less 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e-TR TAS-04 22 Rev ".. - tables than with the original analysis . dependent on LAR approval)
_ .. . ..- . . ...-,.,~~ .-__ __.__ ._ . . ..._ __~_ . . . .. ~_. .. ._ .. . ..... . .___.. . .
CN-TAS-03-15 Rev 1 With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were less 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e_
LTR-TAS-04-22, Rev 2 tables than with the original analysis . dependent on LAR approval) 5 .. 1 1 Previously Deleted NIA NIA NfA 6.- _ . .. . . ...
15 .6- 12 12 .12-4 CN-OA-02 58 Revl 0 App B Table 15 .6 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .513 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
LTR-OA-04-77 Rev 2 specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table .
...5 w...._
W3F 1-2004 .-00 .L OA 0 0 Rev Table 6 a. The majority of the changes are covered by the ..V50 .59 Review Form Section H .A .5 (i .e .,
Attach 5, Table 2 .12- LTR-OA-04-77 Rev 2 EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the dependent on LAR approval) 10 Supporting EPU FUR Table column of this table .
See b below for those changes not explicitly addressed in the EPU LAR .
b . The values for Reactor Trip and SIAS are not found in the corresponding PUR table, however, they are found in the listed calc (CN-TAS-04-20 6-
L1-101-01, Rev . 5
Table 2 Affected FSAI R Tables Nature of Supporting CalculationiDocument(s) 50 .59 Review Category C hanges Made to the FSAR CN-OA-02-58 Rev ^ 0 App B Table 15 .6-13 The changes are covered ^by the EPU LAR and W 50 .59 Review Form Section dh.A .5 (i .e_,
LTR-OA-04-77 Rev 2 specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table .
W 3F 1-2004-0052^. .^ CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Table 6-4~ The changes are covered by the EPU LAIR and 50 .59 Revv ew Form Section li .A-.~.5 (i .e . ,
Attach 5, Table 2 .12-7 LTR-OA-04-77 Rev 2 specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table .
LTR-OA-04-77 Rev 2 .~ ^ This table was revised to reflect that the inadvertent 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A.5 (i.e .,
Opening of a Pressurizer Safety Valve was evaluated dependent on LAR approval) for impact for EPU but the analysts was not reperformed .
CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App 8 Table 15.6-14~ .... The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and . ..~ n 50 .59 Review Form Sectio 11,A.5 (i .e . ,
LTR-OA-04-77 Rev 2 specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table, 5 4a . W3 12004-0052 CN-OA-04 20 Rev 0 Table 6-2 The changes are covered . by the EPU LAIR and 50,59 Review Form Section Il .A .5 (i.e.,
Attach 5 Table 2 .12- LTR-TAS-04 119, Rev 4 specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table .
. _ __ .._ ..._..._ _ mm 6-15 .15 -Eit d or¬ a I ChChange CN OA-02-58 Rev 0 App B Table 15_6-15 Editorial changes were made to the table to reftect the vEditorial, .
resulting figures from the revised analysis for the Large Break LOCA Analysis .
5 6 . ._1&Editor Editorial
. . . .... . . # . -.¬: al
...~ Change CN OA-02 58 Rev 0 App B Table 15 .6=16V Editorial change to table to clarify wording .
15 .6_ 1 a Ed tona Change CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Editorial changes were made to the table to reflect the Editorial .
LTR-OA-04-77 Rev 2 variables plotted due to the revised analysis for the Small Bre ak LO CA Analysis .
NIA .
__ ._ .___ ..._.__~_. ..._ .-_._. . . ._.- .__. _._- . N/A _. .. .-_.. ...~ .__ .,__..___ _ .... .-
This table is Dose related and not within Reference ER-W3-2004-0276-000 N/A N/A 15 .6- 20 Dose Scope This table ¬ s Dose related and not within Reference ER-W -2004-0276-000 ..~_
scope of this ER .
15 .6- 21 ^ 1 Nlo '- .~. .. .
change to 15 .6.3 .4 -N A No change -
(riot limiting location
_ for LOCA) . . ...____....... .
15.6- 22 ~No change to 15 .6_3 .4 N/A No change (not limiting location for LOCA) .
15 .6-23 No change to 1 ^5 .6 .3 .4 NIA No changeW..~
not limiting location L1-101-0"1, Rev . 5
15,6- 24 1 Deleted, Replaced by C N-TAS 15 R ev The changes are covered -by -the - Ei~UAR and 5O,59 Review Form Section ILAA (i .e .,
I New Table 15 .G-4 LTR-TAS-04-22, Rev 2 specificaliy the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table.
Deleted, Replaced by CN-TAS-03-15 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
New Table 15 .6-5 LTR-TAS-04-22, Rev 2 specificafly the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table .
51- 26 Deleted, Repined by This table is Dose related and not within The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section IIA .5 (i .e .,
New Table 15,6-6 scope of this ER . specifically he tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table . (Note, new table 15 .6-6 is not within the scope of this ER) .
CN-TAS-03-15 Rev 1 With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were less 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 O .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-22, Rev 2 tables than with the original analysis . dependent on LAR approval)
CN-TAS-03-15 Rev 1 With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were less 5059 Review Form Section II .A.5 (in_
LTR-TAS-04-22, Rev 2 tabi es than with the original analysis . dependent on LAR approval)
CN-TAS-02-78 Rev 0 App D Table D-I The changes are covered by be EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
LTR-RCPL-04-32, Rev 0 specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent an LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table, .... . . .......... ....
2 .13 .9 .1 .1-2. CN-TAS-02-78 Rev 0 App D Table D-2 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section fl .A .5 (i.e .,
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table .
F Notes : 1 . Attachment ' to 4, Waterford Extendedi Power Uprate Report, unless otherwise noted .
TaWe 3 Affected FSAIR Figures
.11- 11-....... ... .. - 111-Figure Supporting EPU Nature of Changes Supporting CalculationIDocument(s) 50.59 Review Category No . PUR Figure 1 Made to the FSAR 1~7or 15 .0-Review 1 Deleted I LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 e parag raph- in FSAii Section 5,6 .i3.iwhich_ ectbn R&5 on.,
referenced this Figure was deleted, dependent on LAR approval)
CN-TAS-02-96 Rev 0 Fig 7 .3 .1 .7 .3-1 The changes are covered by the 1=P11 LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section ILAA On,,
LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
and CN-TAS-02-96 Rev 0 Fig 731 A 30 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR 50 .59 Review Form Section HA5 (i .,
.e LTR-TAS791,-.1 12, Rev . -O specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
LI-101-0 1, Rev . 5
Page 36 of 83 Table 3 Affected FSAR Figures Figure I Supporting EPU Nature of Changes SupporUng CakulltilordDocurnent(s) 50 .59 Review Category No . I PUR Figure' Made to the FSAR LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 PUR Figure column of this table, Fig 15,1-3 2 .13,1 .1 .3-3 CN-TAS0206 Rev 0 7 .3 .1 .1 .3-3 Ile changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section ll .A,5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-112, Rev . 0 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table .
LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 GN-TAS-02-96 Rev 0 Fig 7 .3 .1 .1 .3-4 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section H .A .5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-112, Rev . 0 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 Fig 2 .13 .1 .1 .3-5 CWTAS0206 Rev 0 7 .3 .1 .1.3-5 The changes are covered by Ne EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section H .A .5 (ix, LI'R-TAS-04-112, Rev. 0 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
L.TR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 FUR Figure column of this table .
CITTAST256 Rev 0 -Fig 7alA34 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 Om, LTR-TAS-04-112, Rev, 0 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev I aI A W The changes are covered by the CPU LAR F,
C N-TAST266 Rev 0 Fy 7 5, 0,59 Review Form Section ----- - 11A .
LTR-TAS-04-112, Rev . 0 specifically the figures listed in the Support dependent on LAR approval)
LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 PUR Figure column of this table .
.3-5_ .
4 CN-TAS-02-9fi Rev 0 -Fig 7 .3 .1 .1 The cha ngos are covered bythe EPU LA R and ...59
. . . .. . .Review
.... ....... .Forrn Section
. . .. .. . . ....... . ILA .5 (i .e,,
L TR-TAS-04-112, Rev . 0 specifically the figures listen A he Supporting Tdependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
LI- R-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 CN-TAS-02-96 Rev 0 Fig 7,3 .1 .1 .3-9 The-changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section 11-A.5 (in, LTR AS-04-112, Rev, 0 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
L.TR-TAS-04-27, Rev I PUR Figure column of this table, CN-TAS-02-96 Rev 0 Fig 7 .3 .1 .1 .3-10 -The- changes- are A-ve-r-
-l---r---c- ed -bl-jthe l ib -
&--X -
Ran d------- 50,59 Review Form Section H .A.5 (in ,
l-TRJAS04"Z Rev. 0 sycikWly the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on L . ..AR approval)
LTRJAS-04-27, Rev 1 FUR Figure column of this table, CN-TAS-02-96 Rev 0 Fly T11,13-11 The changes are covered by Me EPLJ LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section ll .kS On, LTR-TAS-04-112, Rev . 0 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 PUR Figure column of this table .
CN-TAS-02-87 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review- Farm ~Section^11 .A .5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) 1_._. PUR Figure column of this table .
~CN-TAS-02-g7 Rev The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section 11,A,5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed A he Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
W 0 1AL Rev. 5
50 .59 REVIEW FORM Page 37 of 83 TKA Affected FSAR Figures Nature of Changes Supporting Calculation/Document(s) 50 .59 Review Category Made to the FSAR TAS-02-87 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section I LA,5 On,,
LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
CN-TAS-02-87 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section 11,A,5 O-e .,
(Revised per Attach 5 LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F 1 -2004-(I096) 1 PUR Figure column of this table .
13 .1-1 .4-5 CN-TAS-02-87 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section O .A .5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
CN-TAS-02-87 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section H .A .5 (i .e.,
LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 spocificafly the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table, CN-TAS0207 Rev I The, changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section JLA .5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
CN-TAS-02-87 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section ILA.5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table .
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 0 .59 Review Form Section TAZ On .,
speciflakly the figures listed M Me Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table, CN-TAS-02-33 Rev I FQ 70123A The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section ll .A.5 (in, specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
CN-TAS-02-33 Rev 1 Fig 701110 The changes am covered by be EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section H .A.5 {in .,
LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev I specifically the figures listed 5 We Supporting EPtJ dependent on LAR approval}
PUR Figure column of this table .
CITTAST203 Rev 1 Fig 7312&3 LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev I I'The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specificaily the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table .
50 .59 Review Form Section 11,A.5 (in .,
dependent an LAR approval)
CN-TAS-02-33 Rev I Fig 7 .3 .1 .2 .3-4 The changes are covered by the EPLI LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section HA .5 (in .,
LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev I specifically the figures listed 0 We Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table,
-_ 11
.A,5 G"__-__"___
35 -T -he changes sarc
-'-,`covered 'by the PU" LARa 50 .59 Review
-' , -,'--_
Fo r m Section . . . -01, ILTR-TAS-04-27, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F1 -2004-0096) PUR Figure column of this table .
15 .1- 26 2111230 CPKTAS4213 Rev 1 Rg 731234 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and.. .. . . ... ... .. 50 .59 Review Form Section II .Al On, LWOKOt Rev. 5
TaWe 3 Affected FSAR Figures Nature of Changes Supporting Calculation/Document(si 50.59 Review Category I Made 10 the COMM R-TAS-04-27, Rev I I specifically the figures fisted in the Supporting EPU --aepenijeW WEAK -a-P'P'rO vo FUR Figure column of this table.
CN-TAS-02-33 Rev 1 Fig 7 .3.1 .2 .3-7 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section H .A .5 (W LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
Fig f
~ PUR Figure column of this table.
CN-TAS-02-33 Rev 1 7 .3 .1 232 - -
e changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Fofm Section HAA In, LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table, Fig 7 CWTAST203 Rev 1 .3 .1 .2 .3-9 The changes am covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section 11A .5 (Le-,
specifically the figures listed M Me Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table .
Fig 7012300 CN-TAS-02-33 Rev 1 The changes an covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section 11A5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table, CN-TAS-02-33 Rev I Fig 7 .3 .1 .2 .3-11 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section 11-AL (iA .,
LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 ~i specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
Figure column of this table . - 111 --- 11.11. . ....... .... ~ 111- . .... ....... 111- 111--11--
CNAAS-02-33 Rev 1 Fig 7 .3 .1 .2 .302 e changes am covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section H .A .5 ( .e ., i LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPLJ dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
CNJAS&253 Rev 1 Fig 7 .3 .1 .2 .3-13 ^ 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 5019 Review Fonr Section HAT (im, specifically the figures listed in to Supporting EPLJ dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
CN -TAS-03-9 Rev 0 Fig 701 QAd The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section ll .A,5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table, 1511 12111 .2 .4-2 CN-TAS-D3-9 Rev 0 Fig 7 .3 .1 .2 .4-2 1 The changes are covered by the EPLJ.LAR .. . . . - and
- ------- - 50-59 Review Form Section 11A.5 (i .e .,
specifically the figures fisted in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
CN-TAS-03-9 Rev 0 Fig 7 .3 .1 .2 .4-3 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II A.5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev I I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table .
dependent on LAR approval)
CN-TAS-03-9 Rev 0 Fig 7 .3 .1 .2 .4-4 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section HAS_ (i .,
.e LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 spe6fically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table, lal- 38 CN-TAS-03-9 Rev 0 Fig 7 .3 .1 .2 .4-5 Fhe c nges are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section HA5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
QWW Re, 5
Page 39 of 83 Table 3 Affected FSAR Figures Nature of Changes Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
Made to the FSAR
~ FUR Figure column of this table .
CIA-TAS-03-9 Rev 0 Fig 7 .3 .1 .2 .4-6 The changes are covered by the EPLJ LAR and 5159 Review Form Section ILAL (i,e .,
LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev I specifically the figures fisted in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
CN-TAS-03-9 Rev 0 Fig 7,3 .1 .2 .4-7 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section IIA .5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev I spedfically the figures listed in the Supporting FPU dependent on LAIR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
CN-TAS-03-9 Rev . Fig 7 .3 .1 .2 .4-8 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section 11,A,5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev I specifically the figures fisted in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
CN-TAS-03-9 Rev 0 Fig T11 2AT The changes am covered by the EPU LAIR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (ix, LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev I specifically the figures fisted in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table . - 1.- - . .. ..... .. .
GN-TAS-03-9 Rev 0 Fig 7312AOO The changes are covered by Me EPU LAR Wid 50 .59 Review Form Section H.A .5 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table. . . . . .... . .. ... .... . .
CN-TAS-03-9 Rev 0 Fig 7 .3 .1 .1 .4-11 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR arid 50,59 Review Form Section ILA-5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
21112"12 1 CIA-TAS-03-9 Rev 6Fig 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 -Review -Farm Section li .A,5 LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 ~ specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) j PUR Figure column of this table .
C N-TAS-03-9 Rev 0 Fig .7 .3 .1 .2 .4-13 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section If .A .5 (i .e .,-. .u specifically the figures 140d 0 We SuppWAg EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table CNJAS-02-97 Rev I Fig 2,13 .1 .3,1-1 The changes are covered by the EPLJ LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section ILA .5 Ok .,
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F1-2004-0096) FUR Figure column of this table .
2 :11WO2 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev I Fig 2 .13 .9 .3 1 A The changes am covenad by Me EPU LAF and 50 .59 Review Form Section ILA,5 Om, (Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed 5 We Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F1-2004-0096) FUR Figure column of this table, I'll.. ..... .... -'- I'll -. . ..... . . . ...... ..-- --- -'- . ... ...---- - .- " - . .. .. .
2 .13 .1 .3 .1-3 CN-TAS-02-97Rev1 F02 :1113 .1-3 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section ILA .5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent an LAR approval}
to W3171-2004-0096) FUR Figure column of this table, 2 .13 .13 .1-4 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2111&14 ~ The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and ~... .5Q.59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
specifically the figures listed 0 Me Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
I LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 I PUR Figure column of this table, L 1-101-01, Rev, 5
Table Affected FSAR Figures
._ ._~PU .__ . .___ ___ ......___ . .._.____._.__ . . .____.... .......~ ...... ._.._-__..
[F ure Supporting ortin Nature of Changes ^...~ ._ . .
Supporting Calculation/Document(s) 50 .59 Review Category No . PUR Fi 9 ure Made to the FSAR A._
-51 2 .13 .1 .3 .1-5 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2 .13 .1 .3 .1-5 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section ti .A .5 (i.e .,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F1-2004-0096) PUR Figure column of this table .
.~ _._ ... .. ._ ._ _._ ._ ._r .__ .... _ ._ ._ .. ... . .~ ....._ .__~ .___ .__ .~.._ ___ . .. .._ _.___._...-__ .._.____ .___-__ ..._ ._ ._.... .._-.._.... ._._ . ..... .__ ._. .. ... _._ ._. ... .____. . .. ..... . .. .. ._..__ _ ...... . . . .__-------_. .._.._ ._
15 .1_ 52 .~ 2 .131 .3 .1-6 TCN TAS 02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2 .13 .1,3 .1-6 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and ~ . ._50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i.e .,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
. ._.-___..W to. . W3F1-2004-0096) . _ . .... . . . . .~ ..._ . . .. .. ----- ------ ~ .. . .. . T .__ - .. ... . .. _ ._. ..._.-.__ `_ . ....- ..__ . `__. ... . . _ ... . .. . ._ .... .. . . . .. .
15A- 53 2,13 .1 .31-7 CN-TAS 02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2 .13 .1 .3 .1-7 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section ILA .5 (i .e ., _~
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F1-2004-0096) PUR Figure column of this table .
__ . __._____. ._ .._ _ ._ . . . .. . .. . . .. . ._ . . .. _ .. . ._r ._ . .. . __-_ .._._. . ._ . __ _ _ .. . ._- .. .. .___ _. ._ ..__-. .__ ._ _ .. . _- ._ .. _ . .. . ..~ . . . ..._ _ .. _ _...... . _ __. . . .- . ....
15-1-54 2-13 .1 .3 .1-8 CN-TAS 02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2 .13 .1 .3 .1-8 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and E ..50 .59 Review Form Section Il .A .5 (i .e .,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to....W3F1-2004 0096) PUR Figure column of this table
_ ...... ., ~ . .. ..... . . _._ .. ._ .. ..,.__ ... . . ___ . . . . . . . .. . ., .
15,1-55 .. 2 .13 .1 .3 .1-9 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2 .13 .1 .3 .1-9 _ The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and . . ~.. .50_59 Review Form Section ILA .S (i.e .,
[
(Revised per Roach ch 1 L1 - R-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent. on LAR approval) to W3F1-2004-0096) FUR Figure column of this table .
_J 15 .1-56 2 .13 .1 .3 .1-10 ~_. CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2 .13 .1 .3 .1-10 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section Ii .A .5 (i .e .,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU ; dependent on LAR approval) to W3F1-2004-0096) PUR Figure column of this table .
15,1-57 -. .2 .13 .1 .3 .1-11 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2 .13 .1 .3 .1-11 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and ~~ . 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
` _ . ._. ._ to W3F1 ,-2004-1)096) - 1 PUR Figure column of this table .
15 .1-58 .. . . .2 .13 .1 .3 .1-12 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2 .13 .1 .3 .1-12 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Fore} Section I1 .A .5 (i.e ., ..
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F1-2004-0096) PUR Figure column of this table .
~_ .__ ... . ... . . ._- . ._..._ . .. .__ _._ .._~ .._ __. . . ._,._._____ .-__. _ .-_ . .. ....T .... ... ._- . .____ _ . .. ..~ ..__. _ .__.____ _ ~ ..._ ....-_ . . .____... ._ . ._--------- _...... _. .
15 . 59 2.13 .1 .3 .1 13 CN TAS 02 97 Rev 1 Fig 2 .13 .1 .3 .1'!3 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .5 .4 Review Form Section 11 .A .5 (i .e .,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on t_AR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
_ to W3 F1-2004-0096) _
15 .1-60 2 .13,13 .1-14 CN TAS 02 97 Rev 1 Fig 2 .13 .1 .3 .1 14 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and .. 50 .59 Review Form Section 11 .X5 (i .e .,
(Revised per Attach 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) h LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 to W3F1-2004-0096) PUR Figure column of this table .
. ..._ ._ .__. ..- _ .. _1 7 ...__-_....Fi .. C. . . .. .~ .._R.- .. .. ._ . _ . ._50__ __
15 .1-61 2_13 .1 3 .1-15 C _TR S 9 Rev 1 g 2 .13,13 .1-15 Thehe a e covered by e EPU LA and .59 ...Review -F 0 rmSecfionll . A . 5 i .e .
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
^... to W3 F1-2004-0096) ^. PUR Figure column of this table .
15 .1- 62 2 .13 .1 .3.1-16 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2 .13 .1 .3 .1-16 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and .. . .50 .59 Review Form Section 11X5 (i .e .,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
... . . . ... ......... . . .. . . ...... ._ _.. _ _ . ... .` . .~ . . ... -_ . . __ _ _ ._- ... . .._ __ _ _ .. .... .. , .. .. . . ._. _ ........
L1-101-01, Rev . 5 U-101-01,
50 .59 REVIEW FORM Page 41 of 83 Affected FSAR Figures Nature of Changes 2 0R 1 Figure' Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
Made to the FSAR 50 .59 Review Category e
covered 2 .13 .1 .3 .1-17 ~CN-TAS-Q2-97 Rev 1 Fig 2 .13 .1,3 .1-17 The c an esa -1vi, ;Form Section films specifically the hod 0 Me Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to VV3F 1 -2004-0096) PUR. Figure column of this table .
2 .13 .1 .3 .1-18 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2.13 .1 .3 .1-18 The changes am covered by he EPATRAw- ciioniL (Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specificaily the figures fisted in the Supporting EPU dependent an LAR approval) to W3F 1-2004-0096) PUR Figure column of this table .
213 .1 .3 . 19 S-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2 .13,1 .3 .1-19 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section fl .A,5 (r .e .,
(Revised per Attz tLTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F 1 -2004-0096) PUR Figure column of this table .
CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2 .13 .1,3 .1-20 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section JI .A .5 (La, LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 (speoffically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F 1 -2004-0096) PUR Figure column of this table,
_ .2. :.13 .. _... .. . .......
.13 A Al CN JAST207 Rev 1 Fig 2 .13 .1,3 .1-21 ne changes am covered by the EPLJ LAR and i 50 .59 Review Form Section lJ .A,5 PR, (Revised per Attach I LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU I dependent on LAR approval) to W3Fl-2004-0096) PUR Figure column of this table, 2111&102 Rev-i Fig 2 .13 .1 .3 .1-22 ~ The changes are covered by the EPLJ LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section H .A .5 (Le .,
(Revised per Attach I LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed A Me Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to VV3F 1 -2004-0096) PUR Figure column of this table .
1'51 - 69 2 .1 R' ev 1, -F i g .13 .13 1 -2 3 The changes are covered by the. ...EPU .. LAR and - -------- 50 .59 Review Form Section . . ... .ll. .A,S (i .e .,
(Revised per Attach I LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F 1 -2004-0096) PUR Figure column of this table, 15,1-70 2 .131,11 -24 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2 .111,11-24 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review- - Section
--- - -- A5-(Revised per Attach I LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3Fl-2004-0096) FUR Figure column of this table .
~ - -1 -... . . . .....
151- n 2 .13 .1 .1105 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2 13 .13,1-25 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section HAS (in, (Revised per Attach I LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev4 specifically the figures hod A the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F1-2004-0096] PUR Figure column of this table .
._2 .1_26_.
11 5- 72 2A3131106 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig .73 .9 .3 e changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section ll .A,5 (i .e .,
I (Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures ANd A the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F1 -2004-00 PUR Figure column of this table .
15 .1-73 2-13,j1 1-27 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2 .111,3 .1-27 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section flLA.5 (in, (Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3FI-2004-0096) PUR Figure column of this table .
15 .1-74 2 .13A .3,1-28 CN-TAST267 Rev 1 FQ 2A31 1108 he changes are covered by the EPU LAR and .59 Review Form Section 11,A.5 (i .e .,
s .~eclfical~ the figures Iisted in .the, Supporting EPU 0510t Rev. 5
Page 42 of 83 Affected FSAR Figures Figure ~. . . Supporting EPU Nature of Changes i Supporting Calculation/Document(s) 50 .55 Review Category I No . PUR Figure Made to the FSAR
._ .~ ~. .- .Revised( par A-ttach 1 0 9, Fg o t e p on app
- .-taval~~
) ~ .._
to W3F1-2004-Oi?96?
_ .- .._ ._ . . . ...__ ... .. ... . ... ....._~__._ ..r_ _._ ------
15 .1- 75 ^ 2 .13 .1 .3 .1-29 151-75 . I CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2 .13 .1 .3 .1-29 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
_ toW3F1-2004-0096) ! PUR Figure column of this table .
15,1-76 2 .13 .1 .3 .1-30 rn CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2 .13 .1 .3 .1-30 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and --50 .59 Review Form Section II .A.5 (i .e .,~
(Revised per Attach 1 I_TR-TAS-04-119 Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F1-2004-0096) PUR Figure column of this table .
15 .1-77 . 2 .13 .1 .3 .1-31 ' CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2 .13 .1 .3 .1-31 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 5(3 .59 Review Form Section ILA .5 (i .e .,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
~PUR Figure column of this table .
_ to W3F1 .-2004-0096) 1 .. ._ . . ... . m 15_1 78 2 .13 .1 .3 .1-32 CTAS
.'N""- 02 -9Rev7-_, -' , e v 1 Fi - - .-1-3 .1,3 .1 32 92 The changes are covered by the - EP U - LA R and 50 .59 Review Form Section Ii,A.5 (i .e_
(Revised per Attach 1 t .TR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU 3 dependent on LAR approval)
_. to W3Fl-2004-0096) FUR Figure cofumn of this table .
15 .1-79 2 .13 .1 .3 .1-33 ' CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2 .13 .1 .3 .1-33 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and .. 50 .59 Review Form Section ILA.5 (i .e .,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 i specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to.,. W3Fl- 2004-0096) .._. ~` PUR Figure column of this table .
15 .1 2 .13 .1 .3 .1-34 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2 .13 .1 .3 .1-34 . .. The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and ' SF) .59 Review Form Section li-A .5 (i .e .,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-()4-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to = FUR Figure column of this table . ?
_. W3F1-20134-0096) _
- .. .__ . . . _- . __._ ._ . .. .~ _. ... . ... ._ _ ._ r. ._ . _..- . _ __-. .. . ._ .._
. . ._ .~ .. . . ... .__.._ .T .._- . ._.` .._ .. _ ._..___._..~ .. ._ .._.------_ _
5 .1-81 2 .13,1 .3 .1-35 CN TAS-02 97 Rev 1 Fig 2 .13 .1 .3 .1-35 The changes are covered by the EPU LAIR and _--------- 50 .59 Review .. ..... Form Section f .A .5 (s-e .,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
^.-, . ... 4 PUR Figure column of this table .
-to -W3F1-2004 ,-0096) .. .-.... . V. ... _
15 .1-82 2 .13 .1 .3 .1-3 6 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2 .13 .1 .3 .1-36 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and E 50 .59 Review Form Section H .A .5 (i .e .,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 ; specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EF'U dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
- to W3F1-2004, -0096). _ ._ .~ ..._-~ __ ._~..._ _.~_. -. .` . .. ...__.___ _ ..__. ._.~__. .- . . ..~ ... . .___... _ . . ..~,.. .__ .._ ..-. .... ._ . .~ ..._ . .. . . . _ ...
15 .1-83 -.2 .13 .1 .3 .1-37 . ... . C,N-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2 .13 .1 .3 .1-37 The changes are covered by the EPU LAIR and 50 .59 Review Form Section il .A .5 (i .e-(Revised per Attach 1 L7"R-TAS-04-719, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU , dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
_ . _ to W3F1-2004-0096 _ i 15 .1-84 .2 .13 .1 .3 .1-38 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2 .13 .1 .3,1-38 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and ' 50 .59 Review Form Section 11,A .5 (i .e,,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 ` specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F1-2004-0096) _. . . PUR Figure column of this table .
15 .1-85 2 .111 .11-39 .CN-TAS 02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2 .13 .1,3 .1-39 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and .- 50 .59 Review Farm Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on t...AR approval)
_^ to W3Fl-2004-0096) PUR Figure cofumn of this table . _.
. _ _ .. r _ ~m ..-._ ____ ..- . -.. ~.. _.__.. -.......~.- .. ... . -. . . .. - . ... . . .... ... . . ._.. _ ____ . .....-.
L9-101-01, Rev . 5
Page 43 of 83 TaWe 3 Affected FEAR Figures Figure Supporting EPU Nature of Changes Supporting Calculation/Document(s) 50 .59 Review Category PUR Figure Made to the FSAR 2 .13,1,3A-40 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2 .13 .1 .3A-40 The changes are covered by We EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section ILA .5 (i .e .,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F 1 -2.004-0096) PUR Figure column of this table .
15 .1-87 2,131 .11-41 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2,13 .1 .3 .1-41 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section H .A .5 (in.,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
W3171-2004-0096)13 to PUR Figure column of this fable .
15 .1-88 .1 .31-42 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Q 21 W& 142 The changes am covered by Me EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section 11A .5 (r-n ,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 tspecificaily the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) ---- -- -- ------. .. ...
to W3FI-2004-0096) UR Figure column of this table .
15 .1-89 2,13 .1 .3,1-43 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev I Fig 2A3 .1 .11-43 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section H .A .5 (in .,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU I dependent on LAR approval) to W3F PUR Figure column of this table .
2004-0096) 11 .1.. . ... .... 11- 11 .1-. .. ... . . .... .. ...... ... .... . ... .. .... .... ......
15 .1-90 ZW .1144 CN-TAS-02-97 Av I F0 2A&1&144 e changes are covered by Me EPU LAR and 5159 Review Form Section IVA .5 (jn,,
(Revised per Attach I LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures Hod in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W371-2004-0096) PUR Figure column of this table .
2,13 .1,3,1-45 CN-TAS-02 Re Rq The changes am covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section fl .A,5 (in .,
(Revised per Attach I LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3 F 1-2004-igure FUR F column of this table .
15 .1-92 2 .13,1 .3 .1-46 AS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2 .13 .1 .3A-46 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section fl .A .5 (i .e .,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
-20 ,14-0096) j PUR Figure column of this table .
I __ . . . . .. . ...... .. . . . . ...... . ..... ... . . . . .. .... . .... ..
15 .1-93 2 .131 .3 .1 -4i ' T~' i-97 "Re,--1~i' g_'2-.'~~.-6,1-47
- The changes are covered by Me EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section ll .A .5 (in .,
(Revised per Attach I LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent an LAR approval) to W3F 1-2004-(1096).T PUR Figure column of this table .
15 .1- 94 CN-TAS 02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2 .13.1 .3 .1-48 fT changes am covered by- the
- ------ - ------ -EPU --- - LAR ------ - and (in,,
50 .59 Review Form Section II .A,5 (Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-11 9, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F 1 -2004-0096) PUR Figure column of this table .
. 3,1-49 CN-TAS-02-97
- - ------ Rev 1 Fig Z 13 .1 .3 .1 9 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section ILA,5 (i .e .,
" (Revised per Attach 1 LTR-I'AS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to VV3F 1 -2004-0096) PUR Figure column of this table .
the 151-96 2 .131 .3 .1-50 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev I Fig 2 .13 .1 .3 .1-50 ~ The changes am covered Q EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
figures (Revised per Attach I LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F1 -2004-0096) PUR Figure column of this table .
15 .1-97 Existing FSAR Figure NIA No technical change (Figure number changed)
Wq6 U-101-01, Rev . 5
Page 44 of 83
~.
Table 3 Affected FSAR Figures
~_.-_ .. .
Supporting EPU Nature of Changes Supporting Calculation/Document(s) 50 .59 Review Category PUR Figure' Made to the FSAR Existing YFSAR Figure NIA No technical change (Figure number changed) Editorial 15 .1-77 ._
Existing FSAR Figure I NIA o technical change (Figure number changed) ~. Editorial -_-
15 .1-78 Existing FSAR Figure N/A No technical ^ change (Figure -number changed) Editorial 15 .1-79
. . .. _ ._ .r Existing FSAR Figure NIA No technical change (Figure number changed) I Editorial 15 .1-80 . -_ _........ ...
Existing FSAR Figure No technical change (Figure number changed) . .-._ Editorial 15,1-81 Lxisting FSAR Figure NIA No technical change (Figure number changed) 15 .1-82
.W__ _ .___..____._ .
..~_..-.. .. .
No technical change (Figure number changed) Editorial 15 .1-83 WExisting . .FSAR Figure NIA No technicat change (Figure number changed) 15 .1-84 ... . -
Existing FSAR Figure NIA No technical change (Figure number changed) Editorial 1 5,1-85 No technical change (Figure number changed}~ . Editorial . ... . ..
~ . 1 - 11111.11.- ___
CN-TAS-03-23 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II A.5 ( .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-'119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAIR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
_T 1 2 .13 .1 .3 .3-2 CN-TAS-03-23 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section O .A .5^(i .e ,
TR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUP Figure column of this table . .. .
. .CN-TAS-03-23 Rev1....._~ The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and ^ _ .. . 50 .59 Review Form Section Il .A .5(Le, -,
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specific:aliy the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table .
2 .13 .1 .3 .3-4 CN A 03 23 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and ~' ..-A 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5(i .e,,
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this tabl e . -------------
CN-TAS-03-23 Rev1. The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section lI .A .5 (i .e_,
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent can LAR approval)
PUR _ Figure column_ of this table .
~. .. ..._
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and ^.._ 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
LI-101-01, Rev . 5
50 .59 REVIEW FORM Page 45 of 83 Table 3 Affected FSAR Figures Figure Supporting CPU Nature of Changes Supporting Calculation/Document(s) 50 .59 Review Category No . PUR Figure Madeto the FSAR LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifkally Me figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
15 .1-114 2 .13 .1 .3 .3-7 (Revised CIA-TAS-03-23 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section JI .A .5 (Lo, perAttach 5loW3FI- LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) 2004-0096) PUR Figure column of this table .
Pal-in NOT IN PUR CN-TAS-03-23 Rev I Figure not in PUR, however, figure plotted from data 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 from calculation CN-TAS-03-23, which is the basis for dependent on LAR approval) he related section and figures, and therefore implicit, covered by the EPU LAR .
152- 1 2,13Z1 .3-1 CN-TAS-02-53 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section ILA .5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table,
. . . . . .... ....... .... . . . . . .. ... ..___ "_...... .... ... ..._ ., - 1 , 1- 111-. . .. ... .... ... . .. . .. . .. .. ..
112-2 ~ Z 112,1 .3-2 CN-TAS-02-53 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section 11,A .5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU ~ dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this tabie . ..... .. .
151-3 . . .__2 .I3 .2,1 .3-3 CN-TAS-02-53 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR 50 .59 Review Form Section 1l .A .5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU ~ dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table . . .. ... ... ..
T . . .. . . . . . - --------
151-4 2 :132,13-4 CN-TAS-02-53 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section HA .5 {i .e.,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this.. .. ..tabl
. . .... .... .. ... ........ . .... .. ..54 152-5 11321 .3-5 CN-TAS-02-53 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and ~ .59 Review Form Section , I I .A'1.115 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table, 15 .2-6 2 .13 .2 .1 .3-6 CN-TAS-02-53 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i,e,,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed A We Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of 00 table .
15 .2-7 2 .13,2 .1 .3-7 CN-TAS-02-53 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section II,A,5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I . . . ~ specifically the figures listed 0 be Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table, 15 .2-8 2 .13 .2 .1 .3-8 CN-TAS-02-53 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section II .A,5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures iisted in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
15_2- 9 2_13 .2 .1 _3-9 CN-TAS-02-53 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section iI .A .5 (j_e_
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
15 .2-10 2 .13,2 .1 .3-10 CN-TAS-02-53 Rev 1 1T"h, changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 ......Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
LI-101-01, Rev . 5
Page 46 of 83
_ . . ......_._ ..... .... ..__ _. ____...... . _ . . .__ .~__ ._____ . . . . ... _. ._ _ _ _ .__ . .. . T .. . .
-Table 3
~_ ._.Affected FSAR Figures
_. .. ~ ..__ ._ __ . .. ._~__._._ . ._ ~_ .__ . ._ .~__ . ._ _. ._. ._-- . . ._ . .~__ . . . .____ ~_____ ._ .. __ .... ..T_ ._ . . __._ .... .____ .. ._..
Figure .Su_ .-QrtinV.V .. .1cPlt .. Nature of Changes Supporting
. .4~
- Calculation/Document(s) 50 .59 Review Category 1-No. . ._ . PLJR Figure' Natur to the FSAR
.___ ___._...._.. .._..W__... ._ . ....___- ..__. . ._ .. __.._ -_... ..; _ . _ _ ._. .. . ..... ._ _
j_TR-TAS-04_30_ ., Rev specifically thee figures Ilisted in the Supporting EP d epe nae t on LAR approval))
3 FUR- Figure column of this tabl e-
_. .__. .. ..___. ....., .. .__ . _ .-,.._... .n-_. .. ._-.. ._.,., . .._^ . _, .--_-1 .---1.1--...--'- , _ .._-. ._._,--,_,. --_ __,.. ...., .___., ._. .. . . __. ..._____-. ....,---... ...... ...
15,2-11 2112A .3-11 . .CN TAS-02-53 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and - . 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i.e ., .
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Figure colum n of this table .
_ ..__------- .. .. . _ ._ . ..... ... ..W . .~
15 .2- 12 ^ v2 .132 .1 .3-12 ¬ CN-TAS-02-53 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and .50 .59 Review Form Section fiA5 (i .e.,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
15 .2-13 - .2 .13 .2 .1 .3-13 ...CN-TAS-02-53 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAIR and 50 .59 Review Form Section 11 .A .5 (i .e,, .. .
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
.2-14
-15 132 .1 .3 CN TAS-02 53 Rev 1 .The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section IIA .5 LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 E specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
. ._ ._ ... . . _~ . .. . - . ~..__r . ._._ .,,. ._ .. ~. _ . .,_- ._, ___ _ . FUR Figure column of this table .
15 .2-15 .. 2.13 .2_2 .5-1 (Revised . .CN-TAS-03-3 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAIR and .. . 50 .59 Review Form Section fl .A.5 (Le ., .
per LTR-RCPL LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures fisted in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) 120 Rev 1, but not PUR Figure column of this table . j included in PUR revision of W3F1-2004-0096
.__ ... ._ ....... _. ... .. .._ . . .. ~-_ . .. .. ._____. . .___m ._ .-__._..T ... ..._-~ . ...____. ._ .-___ .... . . . ._- . .__ ._. .. .-_. .. ._..__-_ . .__ ._ . _ . . . ... .____._ ._~ ._ .__ ..____
15 .2-16 ..2 .13 .2 .2 .5-2 (Revised CN-TAS-03-3 Rev 1 3 The changes.... . are covered by the EPU LAR .-_-------
and ..` 50 .59 Review Forma Section 1l .A .5 (i .e ., ..~,
per LTR-RCPL LTR-f AS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) i 120 Rev 1, but riot PUR Figure column of this table . ,
included in PUR revision of W3F1-2004-009Fi) L ----- _ .I 15 .2-17 2. .13 .2 .2 .5-3 (Revised CN-TAS-03-3 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section fLA .5 (i .e .,
per LTR-RCPL LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) 120 Rev 1, but not PUR Figure column of this table .
included in FUR revision of W3F1-2004-0096) 15,2-18 2 .13 .2 .2 .5-4 (Revised ..VCN-LAS-03-3 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section dI .A .5 (i .e_
per LTR-RCPL LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) 120 Rev 1, but not PUR Figure column of this table .
included in PUR revision of W3F1-2004-0096)
_ . , _._ _. . ...__ .. ..,____ .. ._._...__ .._.,___ .._., . . . ..¬ .~ .,_,. . .._~_, .._ . _ .. .,_- _ .. .. ___ . _, ., .. .._.-_....._. .. _ .. _-_._,., T. .._, ., .,-_... .__~_ ._ ., .. ..__.~ ._.,. .__ ... . ...,.. .. _ ...... .....__. .___.._ ...,., . ._,_ _ . ._.... .. ._- _... .__. ._, _,.__
15.2- 19 2 .13 .22 .5-5 (Revised CN-TAS-03-3 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review -- ------------Form Section fI .A .5 (Le .,
LI-101-01, Rev . 5
Table 3 Affected FSAR Figures Supporting EPU Nature of Changes .
Supporting Calculation/Document(s) 50 .58 ReYew Category PUR Figure' Made to the FSAR per LTR-RCPL LTR-TAS-04 -- 80, TRev f specifically go figures - listed in the Supporting EPU pen Won appro 120 Rev 1, but not FUR Figure column of this table .
included in FUR revision of W3F I -
2004-0096) -------------
2 .132 .2,5-6 (Revised CN-TAS-03-3 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section I IA,5 (i .e .,
per LTI I-TR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) 120 Rev 1, but not FUR Figure column of this table .
included in FUR revision of W3F 1 -
2004-0096) 15 .2_ 2'i 2 .13 .2 .2 .5-7 {Revised CN-TAS-03-3 Revl The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section HA .5 (ie-per LTR-RCPL LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 spedfically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) 120 Rev 1, but not FUR Figure column of this table .
included in PUR revision of W3FI-2004-0096) 11- - .. . . .... .... .. .. . . ... ........... . . . .. ...... . .... .111, - 1. . .... . . . .... . ...... ... . . ... ..1 111111-... .... ... ..."1 11 1 -- ~'
15 .2-22 2 .112 .25-8 CN-TAS-03-3 Rev 1 The changes are covered-.13y the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section fl .A .5 (i .e .,
(Revised per Attach 5 LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) i~
to VV3F 1 -2004-0096) PUR Figure column of this table .
.... ...... -'- I.." ."" --- ,. .... ... .... ... 11 .11 .11 11 .11.1..... . . .. ... .... .. 11111-1-1-111-15 .2-23 2 .13 .2 .2 .5-9 (Rev sed CN-TAS-03-3 Rev I The Changes a covered by " Me E--PU LAR aid 5019 Review Fwn SecNm HAL O m, per LTR-RCPL i-TR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) 120 Rev 1, but not PUR Figure column of this table .
included in PUR revision of W3FI-2004-0096) 15,2-24 2 .13 .2 .2,5-10 CIA-TAS-03-3 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section iI .A .5 i (Revised per LTR- LITR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specificky the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
RCPL-04-120 Rev PUR Figure column of this table .
but not included in PUR revision of W3Fl-2004-0096)
... .. . . ... .. ... .. - ~ -- - 15 .2-25 213 .2 .2 .5-11 CN-TAS-03-3 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section IIA .5 (i-e,,
(Revised per LTR- LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting IWPU dependent on LAR approval)
RCPL04020 Rev 1, FUR Figure column of this table .
but no included in PUR revision of W3Fl-2004-0096) ---- - ------
15 2:2 2 . 13,2 .2 .5-12 The changes 'are covered y the P6 Ck4' anW 50 .59 Review Fomi Section H .A .5 (i .e .,
_(Revised per LT R ~ec!!i~caliKjhe ores' listedjVthVSWTW"qXTY LWOKOt Rev. 5
Page 48 of 83 Table 3 Affected FEAR Figures Nature of Changes Supporting Calculation/Document(s) 50 .59 Review Category PUR Figure' Made to tt,e FEAR i,_-
1 RcPL-o4'__Y6'REWi'R IT"'RIASWOU Rev FUR Figure -column this table . dependent on LAR approval) but not included in PUR revision of W3Fl-2004-0096) 213 .2 .3 .1-1 CN-TAS-02-30 Rev 0 Figure D .1-1 The changes are covered by the EFU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Secdon HA b 0",
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Figure co lumn of this table .
CN-TAS-02-30 Rev Q ' Figure D .1-7 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Sedan HAL (in-,
L .TR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on t-AR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
GN-TAS-02-30 Rev- 0 Figure D .1-8 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 54,59 Review Form Section HAL (i .e.,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EFU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
CN-TAS-OZ-30 Rev - 0 Figure D .-I-2 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and- ._
. W9 Rmbw Form SmWn HAL (n .,
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table .
CN-TAS-02-30 Rev 0 Figure D .1-5 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section IL .5 {in .,
I-TR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval}
FUR Figure column of this table .
1110TAST220 Rev 0 Figure D14 I The changes am covered by the EPU LAR and ~ 50 .59 Review Form Section H .A.5 (i .x, LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting PU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
CNJAST210 Rev 0 Figure DAB -Me changes are covered by the EFU LAR aW 50 .59 Review Form Sedan H .&5 ( n, LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 - specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table . ,... . .. ... . 1111111- 1111- .... . . . ..... .. ~ -111- - -
11STA&0240 Rev 0 Figure D13 The changes are covered by Me EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section fl -A .5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I - specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table . . ... . . ...... ..... _'__
1&535 1 2 .13 .2 .3 .1 12 CWTAS02-30 Rev 0 Fl um DA12 The changes are covered by Me EPU LAR and Review Form Section HA5 px, L-rR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 - specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
CISTAST530 Rev 0 Figure DJ-15 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 5019 Review Form Section H .A5 on.,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I " specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
CWTAST030 Rev 0 Figure DJ-16 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50-59 Review Farm Section TAL j e, LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 - specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table, QUM Rev . 5
Page 49 of 83 Table 3 Affected FSAR Figures ----------
Nature of Changes Supporting Calculation/Document(s) 50.59 Review Category Made to the FSAR CIWAST200 Rev 0 Fl um D19 The changes are cove red by the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section IIAZ On, LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
CN-TAS-0260 Rev 0 Figme DJ -14 The changes am covered by the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section II .A.5 (i.e.,
specifically the figures listed M Me Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table.
N-TAS-02-30 Rev 0 Figure D.1-1 1 7-~h - changes covered-b-by the E-'P' ,-U" 'L'-A"-R-a,grad --0-19--be-Ae-w- F-im" 5 O.e,,
t TR-TAS-04-30, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
CNJAST210 Rev 0 Figure DA13 The changes am covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section IfA5 Re.,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
1&542 Z132&140 C N-TAS&530 Rev 0 Figure 0110 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section 11 .A.5 (i.e.,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table. .. .. ......
11043 113211A7 CWTAST200 Rev 0 Figure D-1-1 7 e changes are covered by he EPU LAR and 50.59 Review FonTi Serfron lIA5 O .e-T LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table . --------- ----
CN-TAS-02-30 Rev 0 Figure D.1-18 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Sedbin H.A6 On, LI'R-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures "No 0 Me Supporting EPLJ dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table .
CKTAS0260 Rev 0 Quire 0519 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section IIA5 On, LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table .
CN-TAS-02-30 Rev 0 Figure DA4 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A.S (i .e.,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I specifically the figures listed 6 We Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
CN-TAS-02-30 Rev 0 Figure DJI-7 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section HA5 On .,
L.TR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PURFi Figure g colum n of this table .
CNJAST200 Rev D Figure DMA The changes are covered by thetheEPU LAR and !W9 Review Form Section II.A .5 (rn, LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I specifically the figures 90d W Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this tabfe.
CWTAST200 Rev 0 FWwe 1111-2 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section IIA5 (in, LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
CN-TAS-02-30 Rev 0 Figure DAI-5 changes are covered by the EPLI LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section IIA5 (in, U-1 0 1 -01, Rev. 5
Tattle 3 Affected FSAR Figures Nature of Changes 50 .59 Review Category Made to the FSAR d
specifically the figures listed A We Supporting EPU dope nt on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table . 1-11-11-..
and CN-TAS-02-30 Rev 0 Figure D .Ii-4 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR _9 Review Form Secticin HA5 Ym, LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 - specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
CN-TAS-02-30 Rev 0 Figure D .II-6 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent an LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
2AW&U22 CN-TAS-02-30 Rev 0 Figure D .11-3 The changes are covered by he EPU LARnn? 1 5019 Review Form Section H .A .5 {i .e ., I LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I - specifically the figures listed in the Supporting PU I dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this ta ble .
CWTAST240 Rev 0 Figure D .H-12 The changes are covered by the EPLJ LAR and ~ 50 .59 Review Form Section H .A .5 (i .e .,
L.TR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table, .... .. .. . .
Figure [1516 covered and CWTAST530 Rev 0 The changes are Q Me EPU LAR 501,9 Review Form Section H A 5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
..... .. ... .... ... .... . ...... .... ... ... -1.. . .. .. . . .... . .. . I'll, -111111.... .. . ... . .....
Figure D A06 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A.5 (i .e .,
CNAAST200 Rev 0 me c_ha ng es are covere -- d by the EPU LAR and LTR AS-04-30, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on t .AR approval)
PUR
' " Figure column of this table .
CNJAST200 Rev 0 Figure DI-9 The changes are, covered by the EPU LAR and 50-59 Review _, w ' Form-Sed`oJ '"HAh 01" figures LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the listed 0 Me Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
CN-TAS-02-30 Rev O Figure all-14 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and t -50,59 ----------- Rev,~w Form Section 11 .&5 OA .,
I TR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 - specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
CNAAST200 Rev 0 Figure DJ-11 The changes are covered by he EPU LAR and .59 Review Form Section H .A .5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 - specifically the figures listed h the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table, CNJAS&260 Rev O Figure 0143 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
L-TR-TAS-04-30, Rev I - specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent an LAR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table .
and CWTAST530 Rev 0 Figure DA-I0 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR 50 .59 ReOew Form Section ILA,5 (Le .,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 - specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
2 .13,23.1-36 CN-TAS-02-30 Rev 0 Figure ETHA7 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50159 Review Form Section ILA .5 (W LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 - specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
L1-10101, Raw 5
53 Affected FSAR Figures Nature of Changes Supporting Calculation/Document(s) 50 .69 Review Category Made to the FEAR PUR Figure column of this table.
covered CIN-TAS-02-30 Rev 0 Figure 11111-18 The changes am by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review f=orm Section II .A .5 (in, LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approvaf)
FUR Figure column of-this ---------table .
CN-TAST530 Rev 0 Figure D=9 He changes am covered 4 the EPLJ LAFT and 50.59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .w, LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
CN-TAS-03-3 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section II .A,5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of .....this table .
CN-TAS-03-3 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Revi(-,W Form Section IIA .5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I specifically the figures Usted in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this . .. .. .... table .
CN-TAS-03-3 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section 11,A .5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-3G, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
15 .2-68 2 .1 3-2.3 .2-4 CN-TAS-03-3 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A,5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
UR Ffigure column of this table .
15 .2-69 2 .13,2 .3 .2-5 CN-TAS-03-3 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section ll .A.5 (i .e.,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
152- 70 2 .112,12-6 CN-TAS-03-3 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A.5 {i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table . .. .. .... ... . . ...
15 .2-71 2 .13 .2 .3 .2-7 CN-TAS-03-3 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section IIA .5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
. . . .. . .. .. .... .2. 8 115 .2-72 2 .13,2~3- CN-TAS-03-3 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAP, and 50,59 Review Form Section II .A,5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I specifically the figures fisted in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR f=igure column of this table.
2 .13 .2 .".2-9 CN-TAS-03-3 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .,
.e I-TR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table .
2 .13 .2 .3-2-10 CN-TAS-03-3 Rev I e changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I specifically the figures Ltd in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
LI-10001 Rev. 5
Table 3 Affected FSAR Fi gures Figure Supporting EPU Nature of Changes Supporting Calculation/Document(s) 513 .59 Review Category No . PUR Figure' Made to the FSAR
'15 .2- 75 2 .13_2_3.2-11 CN-TAS-03-3 Rev 1 .~ . .. .. The changes are covered by the^ EPU LAR and m50 .59 Review Form Section JIA5 (i-e . , J LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table, 15 .3-1 213,32 .1-1 CN-TAS-02-98 Rev 0 Figure 7 .3 .3 .2 .1-1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section Il .A .5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-21, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting CPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure co lumn of this table .
CN-TAS-02-98 Rev 0 Figure^ 73 .3 .21-2 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and ....... 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e-LTR-TAS-04-21, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAIR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
CN-TAS-02-98 Rev 0 Figure 7 .3 .3 .2 .1-3 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and ^ 50,59 Review Form Section I ( ,
LTR-TAS-04-21, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU de dependent P on LAR approval, PUR Figure colum n of this table .
_ .. H CN-TAS-02-98 Rev 0 Figure 7.3 .3 .2 .1-4 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR. and 059 Review Form Section .A .5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-21, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table_
CN-TAS-02-98 Rev 0 Figure 7 .3 .3 .2 .1-5 . The changes are . covered by the EPU LAR and . . . . . . 50-59 Review Form ~ Section . II .A .5 (i .e . ,
LTR-TAS-04-21, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
CN-TAS-02-98 Rev 0 Figure 7 .3 .3 .2 . 1 -6 The changes are covered by the ^EPU LAR and ^ . .. .50 .59 Review Form Section~IIA5 (Le_ ,.
LTR-TAS-04-21 . Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent can LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of thi s table .
. ...~ . j
_ 7 _ ~ 5 ...._.__ .. _ .. .
CN-TAS-02-98 Rev 0 Figure 7 .3,3 .2 .1_ by The changes are covered . . the EPU LAR and .. -v iewForm rm Section il A .5 7(i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-21, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approvai)
PUR Figure column of this table .
CN-TAS-02-98 Rev 0 Figure 7 .3 .3 .2 .1-8 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section H .A .5 (i . ,
LTR-TAS-04-21, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
W . .
13 .3 .2 1-8 CN-TAS-02-98 Rev 0 Figure 7 .3 .3 .2 .1-9 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section IIAL (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-21, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table .
_____ .~ .. ._ . .. .._, ., ., .., ._ ._ .__ .__-
CN-TAS-03-10 Rev 0 Figure 7 .3 .3.3.1-1 l The changes are covered by the .EPU LAR and~ ~ 50,5 Review Form Section IIA5 (i .e ., .. ..N LTR-TAS-04-21, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent can LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this ta b le .
2.. .. ... . p --------.__.- .. ._ .,------------
CN-TAS-03-10 Rev 0 Figure 7 .3 .3.3 .1- The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i_e .,
LTR-TAS-04-21, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table .
CN TAS-03 10 Rev 0 Figure 7 .3 .3 .3 .1-3 The changes are covered by the EPU LAIR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
LI-101-0 1, Rev . 5
Table 3 Affected FSAR Figures FQwe SupportinCPU Nature of Changes Supporting Calculation/Document(s) 50 .59 Review Category No . PUR Figure ' Made to the FSAR
.QTR-TAS-04-21, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
15,3-13 2 .13-3,3 .1-4 CN-TAS-03-10 Rev 0 Q um TUW4 - The chanps am covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Revrew Form Section fl .k5 (i .e .,
I-TR-TAS-04-21, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table, 15.3-14 2 .13 .3 .3 .1-5 CN-TAS-03-10 Rev 0 Figure 7 .3 .3,3 .1-5 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i,e,,
LTR-TAS-04-21, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
153- 15 2 .1113 .1-6 CN-TAS-03-10 Rev 0 Figure 7.3 .3 .3 .1-6 The changes am covered Q the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section ll .k5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-21, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent an LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
5 .3--- 16 2,13 .3 .3 .1-7 . . . CN-TAS-03-10
.. . .. . . Rev 0 Figure T31010 The changes am covered - --- ------by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section H .A .5 (i .e .,
LTR-"FAS-04-21, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
15 .3-17 2A3,13-1-8 CN-TAS-03-10 Rev 0 Figure 7 .3 .3 .3 .1 -8 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section I I .A .5 (i .e_
LTR-TAS-04-21, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table .
Figure AS is WiI&1-9 CNJAS-0300 Rev 0 TI&3 .1-9 . .. . .. . The changes" are covered by the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section 11,A.5 Oy~,-
LTR-TAS-04-21, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
I FUR Figure column of this table .
15.4-1 Z13AA .1-1 GN-TAS-02-70 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A,5 (i .e .,
LTR AS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
15 .4-2 2,13 .41 .1-2 CN-TAS-02-70 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section ILA .5 (i,e_
LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table . ....... . . ... ..
,15 .4-3 2 .13 .4,11-8 CN-TAS-02-70 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section ILA .5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table, 154- 4 21 3A .1 .1 -3 CN-TAS-02-7D Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPLJ LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section .A .5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column
.. .. .. . ... -- --------- -- --- - ------- of this table . -------
15 .4-5 213 .4 .11-4 CN-TAS-02-70 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section ILA,5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table . --------
5,4-6 2 .13 .4 .1_ ._.1-5 Rev im The changes am covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Farm Section 1 .~~ O .e .
LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
L=Qt Rev. 5
Table 3 Affected FSAR Figures Figure -~U-pp, , - rting EPU Nature of Changes Supporting Calculation/Document(s) 50 .59 Review Category No. PUR Figure' Made to the FSAR FOR Figure co lumno f this ta ble .
15A- 7 CNAAS02JO Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section H .A .5 "e .,
LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval}
PUR Figure column of this table .
15A- 8 CWTAS4124 Q, I The changes are covered-b- y- "the EFU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section il .A .5 {i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval}
PUR Figure column of this table .
15A- 9 CN-TASW70 Rev I The changes are covered by Me EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section H .A .5 to, the LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed 5 Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval}
FUR Figure column of this table .
CN-TAS-02-70 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and iieview Form Section II.A .5 (i,o, LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
CN-TAS-02-70 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section 11,A .5 LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table, CN-TAS-02-70 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR wid ~ 50 .59 Review Faun Section (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev I specifically the figures 150d A he Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
CN-TAS-02-70 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section HAT on, LTR-1 AS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPLJ dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
CN-TAS-'-6270 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Saction W&5 (in .,
LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on I.AR approval)
.... . .. .. .... ..- ----- - FUR Figure column of this table .
2 .13 .4,1,2-6 CN-TAS-02-70 Rev The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section H .A.5 (i .e . :
LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on I-AR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
CN-TAS-02-70 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 {i .e .,
S-04-28, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR appmvai)
PUR Figure co lumn of this table .
15A- 17 2 .13 .4 .1,3-1 (Hevised CN-TAS-02-95 Rev 0 Figure 7 .3 .4 .1 .11 'he cAngnes am covered by he EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section HIS "0" per LTR-RCPL specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU TR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 dependent on LAR approval) 120 Rev 1, but not PUR Ffigure column of this table .
included in PUR revision of W3171-2004-0096)
LMOVOt Rev. 5
50_59 REVIEW FORM Page 55 of 83 Table 3 Affected F SAR Fi gu res Supporting EPU Nature of Changes Supporting Calculation/Document(s) 50 .59 Review Category PUR Figure r Made to the FSAR 2 .. _
2 .13 .4 .1 .3-2 (Revised CN-TAS-02-95 Rev 0 Figure 7 .3 .4 .1 .3- The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e . ,
per LTR-RCPL T'R-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) 120 Rev 1, but not PUR Figure column of this table .
included in PUR revision of W3F1-2004-0096) .. ....__ ~~ _._ .-... .. ... ..... ... .... . . ...._ _ .. . t .- . . .. .. .. ._ r_ ...... ... ...
~ .. ._
2 .13 .4.1 .3-3-. .-_ . .. CN-TAS-02-95 Rev 0-.Figure 7.3 .4 .1 .3-3 The changes are covered by e EPU LAR a 50 .59 Review Form Section iI .A .5 (i .e .,
(Revised per Attach 5 LTR-TA5-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3171-2004-0096) PUR Figure column of this table .
_ ._. . . . "rm .S_ _.
i 2 .13 .4 .1-3-4 (Revised CN TAS-02-95 Rev 0 Figure 7 .3 .4 .1 .3-4 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50-.59 Revs 'ew_Fo Section ILA_"5 .( .e .~,
per LTR-RCPL LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting PtJ dependent on LAR approval) 120 Rev 1, but not PUR Figure column of this table .
included in PUR revision of VV3F1-2004-0096) .. .
2 .13 .4 .1 . -3. _5 CN-TAS-02-95 Rev 0 Figure 7 .3 .4.^1,3-5 They changes are covered by the EPU LAR and ~~ . .. 50 .59 Review Form Section V II .A .6 (i .e-(Revised per Attach 5 II_TR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F1-20114-0096) PUR Figure column of this table .
_ _. . _ ure._7 .. .'1 2 .13 .4.1 3=6 (Revised . CN-TAS-02-_95 Rev O Figure .3__.4 .3fi The changes are covered bythe EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section fl .A .5 (i .e .,
per LTR-RCPL LTR-TA5-04-28 . Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) 120 Rev 1, but not PUR Figure column of this table .
included in PUR revision of W3F1-2004-0096)
._ ~ ._ -. . . ...._-1 ..
15 .4- 23 2 .13 .4,1,3-7 C: -TAS-£12-95 Rev O Figure 7 , .~ .437 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section II .A .5^.(i .e
(Revised per Attach 5 t.TR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F1-2004-0 096) 1 PUR Figure column of this table .
'15 .4- 24 2 .13 .4 .1 .3-8 (Revised CN-TAS-02-95 Rev 0 Figure 7 .3 .4 .1 .3-8 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form .Section hl .A .5^(i .e .,
per LTR-RCPL LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) 120 Rev 1, but not PUR Figure column of this table, included in PUR revisions of W3F1- i 2004-0096) 15 .4-25 2 .13 .4 .1 .3-9 (Revised . .. CN-TAS-02-95 Rev 0 Figure 7 .3 .4 .1 .3-9 The changes are covered by the EPU ^ LAR andY .. . 50 .59 Review Form Section V Ii .A .5 (i .e .,
per LTR-RCPL t-TR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) 120 Rev 1, but not PUR Figure column of this table .
included in PUR revision of W3F1-2004-0096)
LI-101-01, Rev . 5
Table 3 Affected FSAR Figures SUartlnED" FIrW Nature of Changes Supporting Calculation/Document(s) 50 .59 Review Category PUR Figure Made to the FSAR . .__ ..
213 .41 .3-10 CNwTAS-02-95 Rev 0 Que 73 .4 .1 .3-10 The changes are covered by th-e -E-P U-- " -.- _-_
LA-Vaand 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A,5 Om, (Revised per LTR- LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
RCPL&4q2O Rev 1, PUR Figure column of this table .
but not included in PUR revision of W3F1-2004-0096) - ----------
Review 2-13-4 .1 .3-11 CN-TAS-02-95 Rev-O Figure 7 .3.4 .1 .3-11 The changes am covered by the EPU LAR and 5019 Form Section HAZ (iX, (Revised per LTR- LI - R-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
RCPL-04-120 Rev 1, PUR Figure column of this table .
but not included in FUR revision of I W3171-2004-0096) 2,13 .4 .1,3-12 CNJAST205 Rev a Figure 7 .3 .4 .1.3-12 He changes am covered by Me EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e ;,
(Revised per LTR- LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on [ ...AR approval)
RCPL&4020 Rev 1, PUR Figure column of this table.
but not included iii PUR revision of W3F1-2004-0096) 15 .4-29 1, 213 .4 .13-13 NOT IN CALC The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
(Revised per LTR- LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
RCPL04A20 Rev 1, PUR Figure column of this table .
but not included in PUR revision of W3F1-2004-0096)
. . ........ --- ------ -- .1 -
The changes are covered by Me EPU LAR and
~ ------
213 .4 .1X1 CN-TAS-02-92 Rev 0 App D Que DA 50,59 Review Form Section If .A .5 (La, LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table . . .... .. . . .. .....
CN-TAS-02-92 Rev 0 App D Figure D-2 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section ILA,5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
J .PYR Figure column of this table CN-TAST2-92 Rev 0 App 0 Figure DO The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section 1I .A .5 (Le,,
LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table. .
CN-TAS-02-92 Rev 0 App D Figure D-1 The changes am covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section 1I .A .5 (i .e .,
.A LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table,
...O CN-TAST202 Rev D Figure DO 'Me changes am covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section h .A .5 (j .e.,
LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed 0 he SppWing EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table, LM0101 Rev . 5
Table 3 Affected FEAR Figures N
Figure Supporting EPU ature of Changes__
Supporting Calculation/Document(s) 50,59 Review Category No . PUR Figure M ade to the FSAR _. . ._._
15 .4-35 2 .13 .4 .1 .4-7 CN-TAS-02-92 Rev 0 App D Figure D-$ he changes are covered by. the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section il .5 (i . ,
LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 pecifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure colu mn o f this table .
15-4-36~~ i 2 .13 .4 .'¬ .4-5 ^ CN-TAS-02-92 Rev^ 0 App D Figure D-7 The changes are covered by them_EPU LAR and ..~ ._ .. . 50 .59 Review Form Section 11 .5 (i . ,
LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PU R Figu re colu m n of this table .
_ .2 .._ _~ _____ ....._-.. .. .. . ... ..._ ------- _.. .._. ..__ . .._.__ __ .~ .. ..._ ..
15 .4-37 .13 .4 .1 .4-8 ~_ CN-TAS-02-92 Rev 0 App D Figure D-8 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section I :AI .5 ( . ,
LTR-TAS-t14-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR , Figure colum n of th is table . ...... .. ^~ _____ .. . .... ._
15 .4- 38 2_ 13 .4 .1 .4-9 CN-TAS-02-92 Rev 0 App D Figure D-9 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .69 Review Form Section fI .A .5 i .e . .
i specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 dependent on LAIR approval)
~ FUR F igure column of this table .
C
-TAS-02-92 Rev ^C# With the new analysis for section 15 .4 there were less 50 .59 Review Form . Section 4 ILA .5 (i .e .,
LTR7TAS-04 2_8, Rev^ 1 figures than with the original analysis . dependent on L AR approval) 40
.-ton II-A Sec 15 .4- Deleted CN-TAS-02-92 Rev 0 With the new analysis for section 15 .4 there were less 50 .59 Rev ew Form .5 (i .e. ,
LTR TAS-(14-28, Rev 1 figures than with the original analysis . dependent on LAR approval) 15 .4- 41 ^ .. Defeted CN-TAS-02 9 2 Rev 0 With the new analysis for section 15 .4 there were less 50 .5 .9 Review Form Section 11,A,5 (Le- ,
LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 figures than with the original analysis . dependent on LAR approval)
Deleted _ .CN TAS-02-92 Rev 0 T With the new analysis for section 15 .4 there were less 50 .59 Re- view Form SectionII .A.5V ( Le .,,
LTR-1 -AS-04-28, Rev 1 figures than with the original analysis . dependent on LAR approval) 15
^~.4-43 Deleted CN-TAS-02-92 Rev 0 With the new analysis for section 15 .4 there were less 50 .59 Review Form Section ILA .5 (i .e .,,
LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 figures than with the original analysis . dependent on LAIR approval)
._ _~. _ ~__ ... . . .. .. ._.
15 .4- 4 Original Figure 15 .4- NIA Only editorial changes to this figure change to a~ oial 98 was changed to figure number) .
15 .4-44 Original Figure 15 .4- Only editorial changes to this figure (i .e ., change to a 99 was changed to figure number) .
3_.._.
CN-TAS-03-8 Rev The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section II .A .5 V(Le .,
LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column _ of this table .
3_._ t. .__. . . ..... . ~ ._._ . . ._ __ --------------
2 .13.4 .3 .2-2~ A5-03-8 Rev The^ changes are covered mhby he EPU LAR d 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
(Revised per Attach 5 LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the 9ufigures listed in the Supporting i=PU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
_ to W3F1-2004-0096)
.2 .13_4 .3 .2-_3 -FCN-TAS-03-$ Rev g The changes are covered bythe EPU LAR and ... . ._.. 5(7 .59 Review ..Form Section -II .A.5 (i.e .,
specificatly the figure s listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
LI-101-01, Rev . 5
Table 3 Nature of Changes Supporting Calculation/Document(s) 50 .59 Review Category PUR Figure Made to th e FSAR LTR -TAS-04-28, Rev 1 PUR Fig ure colu mn of this table .
.._ ..._ ._...._ ... ._ .~_ .
CN-TAS-03-8 ^Rev 3.^ . .~ .._ The changes are covered -.by the EPU LAR and .. . . W .v. 50 .59 Review Form Section l 1 .A .5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on L.AR approval)
PUR F igure column of this table .
3 _ .~._~.
2 .13_4 .3,2-5 ~CN-TAS-03-8 Re The changes are covered by the EPU LAIR and j 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
Wv LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figu re colum n of this table .
CN-TAS-03-8 Rev 3 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section IIA5 (i .e .,
LI R-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figu re column of this table .
2 .13 .4 .3 .2-7 (Revised CN-TAS-03-8 Rev 3 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and .... . 9 Review Form Section II .A .5(i y .e .,
per W3F1-20040073) LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed to the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
.. .. FUR Figur e column of thi s table .
93 .4 .3 .2_ (Revised CN-TAS-03-8 Rev 3 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and . . .. 50 .59 Review Form Section ILA .5 (i .e .,
per W3F1-2004-0073) LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
E PUP Figure column of this table .
2 .13 .4 .3 .2-9 (Revised ~ CN TAS-03-8 Rev 3 by..-_
The changes are covered e .-. the EPU LAR and .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
per W3F1-2004-0073)1 LTR TAS-04-28, Rev 1 1-specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAIR approval)
. .._ .~ PUR Figure column o f this table .
2 .13,4 .3 .2-10 The CN-TAS-03-8 Rev 3 '. . . changes are covered by the f=PU LAR and . . ... ... 513 .59 Review Fgrm Section ILA .S (i,e (Revised per W3F1- LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on t_AR approval) 2004-0073) PUR Figure column of this tabl e .
_. . ..... .. .. _ ._-.._,., . ..,---- - _ ._~____ _~ .._^
2,13A .32-11 C1 -TAS-03-8VRev_3 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and .^ . ._ . 5 ¬3 .59 Review Form Section II .A .6 (Le .,
(Revised per W3F1- L -TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) 2004-0073) FUR Figure column of this table .
_m. . . . . .... .. . .
15A-57 3 2 .13 .4 .3 .2-12 CN-TAS-03-8 Rev 3 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and - .. . ~n 9 Review Form Sectio ILA .5 (i.e .,
(Revised per Attach 5 L - f"R-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAIR approval) to W3F1-2004-0096) FUR Figure column of this table .
CN-TAS-02-41 Rev 0 Figure 7 .3 .8 .3 .1-1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAIR and 5 ¬3 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-22, Rev 2 specifically the figures fisted in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
! t'UR Figu re colum n of this table .
CN-TAS-02-41 ^ Rev 0 Figure 7 .3 .6 .3 .'1-2 The changes are covered by the~EPU LAR and . 50 .59 Review Form Section IIA5V (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-22, Rev 2 j specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAIR approval)
PUR Figure colum n of this ta ble .
CN-TAS-02-41 Rev 0 Figure 7 .3 .6 .3 .1-3 ~.~ The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59) Review Form Section Ii .A .5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-22, Rev 2 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
LI-101-01, Rev . 5
_..~.. _.~~... .~ -. .. ..
~m/§
-~~~\~/ ~~%d~AR
~~~ ~~.~gJ~
~~ _~.~. ..'_ _ ~_
~~ e/ ~p~q~ E~ ~/\ cmA~ _moAm~ #@~~ /um @ ~ a~ /m RA@_ ~ #~ /~
N~ ~k F6me m~_e& met AR _ _
,\// ~.~ /$\9 ~~~ Cm~\J&>>~y0~\e7+/-~d4 ~ ~\<<~ k<<ae mmmd& metU(~ md~~~~~\/~~~A~ dm \/~:
~R4~~%% ~v2 a<<~a9 meGur G!W b bes9~~ gE~ +<<<<m!m UR9~a§
_ PuRF_%De~ u_ y G_s %~~ .
S: (~ s~\/~ -~~~_~~~~~ 4~~/odua722: ~ ~ ~ekqm // mm\\ Q!+\PUS /\<< ~~ ~~03~e\&F~~St~:~Q\
~w~ w~ 2% ~v2 9~ wm&me+ums~dk Ash Su9~~ ~U k9<<e# m~ Ra<<r q
.~~~.~~ ~.~.~~~~~. ~~ ~>>\/ ~ e m~ ,n ~ j QBy ~~ .~ ...~~...
,&ee z~aaw~+/- CN7Awg4~~ v0egum za£$~$ ~e +aqm ae mmmd #th EPU Rad ~0 m ~v>~ A ~Qm %%5 @:\~
~ +/-~ Sma%~v2 m~ em& meWu~ ~wke~R s+~$q~ U &Wdmlm~RipRg
_ PURF)um~ umn a %& %bw _
~/7~ /~ m\:~~~~~~~~ y~%>>Ra\ege~ \m\SZ ~\cm<<\m m+\\~k ~//m/~~~~ /m\~~/\m~~ n~~~\
~W~ ym%%~v2 a<<cam m&~h W;r Glkb~h ~<<0 9EPU +WWe% m~ Ra<<~ q
. .~..~~.. .~..~~ . .~~~ ~ /~ /~~mG~~ G~+y ~~~._~.. ... . . . .~~ ...
4Eee z~sw$4$ CNe&y~ 4~~voF)ua 2IEZl$ ~emaq<<am mmr ~ metU~Rad m.m~v w~~ ~amn~ SKw
~lw~ y~ 9% ~ v2 +e~ a9 me Gumans dM %esu?~ q EPU de<<kem m ~R 7~ v)
, POR E%ue mbmnM %K %mE 4/6- ~ ~:~ a ;~~~~~~~N/\yam6 \/v im \e2aw\~$ ~ \k Gm7\<<~m//dyk \P ~~<< ~~ ~\/~~~(em ~dm~/~ \ )
LT+/-~y<<a%~v2 m~ym%!G Gur G!k M bes9p%GEPU ~+~mew m~Ra+rq
.._ ~~~~.~.~...~~~.._~~ ~.~.f// ~~~~/~ :~~aE ~~~~~~~\ . .~~~...~...~ \
~s: m z~*Ea:l cm~SmgSR<<~ Tk magGae mama& me~U~Rak ~+.m~~ >>~r~ do,~ks¢G
{~v~ moral!#h4 ~~~S~ d W,~,4 spc~ m& mewgu~ ~yk m mesu<<omgEPU d7mk4 m~ R 7~ ~> '
% haw vm6mm) PURF%Ra m~~ n& b& m~~ . '
~s g ~j$\3 ~~~~~~~~ym/\~v~~ ~~~~~.~ /b~ ~q<<~~m~/\~ej\{/R m~~~~~/m ~~ _~ q am \/~:/
me +d~rA!!<<h4 ~ R2~- g!%Rm4 ~m~+m& me&u~ ns uh~h Sm~$9~ U +&We% m~ Ra<<~m) b aaw~!40 $mG ~~ R~gum~ umna m& bmm S: w~ 2 . +/-~-~ ~~~ /~~s3\S ~/~~~~~~~~~~~h/Wm<<~ e~ v/d Sk jL~\k~~~~o\\~~ war \~i r<<~w, y~ +d<<rte~h4 ~m~ ygJ~K~,4 s<<cam m&~b Qer ~kk A mes ;+o~ gEPU u~eWemon~ R+pRq b waH &m6mm} RURF%ue~ u~ << Gmb~l .
i/s/a ~ Same ~~~~ \~~wm%S~}7 ~~~~~~~~~~hn~\e/mm\d~k~U~R>>d~~~ ~m \\v~~A~ym~:i
(~ vk~rA<<h4 ~mT4S~2q,~v4 +ecq6 meGur ~Qk A meSu+~~gEPU +#6em m~ RaP~qi b waG %~tmm} PURF)ue mlumma mG %we
~E Q~ 2~ w\j4~~~~ ~~/ymj5~v~~~~ ~~ /n~ ~~~e m\/& /~ §~ \Rmd~~~~~~~v~~ A\~~ //~i,
(~ v+ <<rte+h4 ~~~ S~d~K ~v4 ~+~+6yme+uesl2Q m mesm~4~ EPU d<<mae* m~ RaP~ v>
b waw Jmtmm) PURFguec umn¥ Ga%ae
~5 :js 2~~~/~~~~ ~-\yoj~ << \~~~~~~~~ }~ mm~~ e mu\ <<~ ~~/\R aU~~~ ~~ 9 ~v>> ~r ~mm \<<~~\
{~vk <<rA<<h4 ~~~ymJ~% ~v4 a<<~a6 mekum>>Ikk Mph su9~ m ~u +aWe* m~ R~~>>)
- ~©\/~~4/m6 m~ _n~~ mom§
~ . .~~~.~~~~ . . \/~Fi OJmCt~>5
Page 613 of 83
_. Table 3 Affected FSAR Figures
. _ ~~ . .~ _..__.. . .._. .._
Supporting PU - .. Nature of Changes Supporting Calculation/Document(s) 50 .59 Review Category PUR Figure' Made to the FSAR
~ _m. ...-
2 .13 .6 .3 .2-6 CN-TAS-03-15 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Farm Section ILA .5 (i .e .,,
(Revised per Attach 4 LTR-TAS-04-113, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3FI-2004-0096) PUR Figure column of this table .
Rev 1 2 .13 .6 .32-7 CN-TAS-03-15 The changes arecovered by the EPULAR - and 50,59 Review Form Section IP .A .5 (Revised per Attach 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F1-2004-0096) PUR Figure column of this table .
. . ._._ . . . ..CN _. . . e ..... .
2.13 .6 .3 .2-g TAS-03-1 5 Rev _-_
changes are covered by the EPU LAR and . . 50.59 Review Form Section II .A.S (i .e .,
(Revised per Attach 4 L.R-TAS-04-119, T Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to. W3F1-2004-0096) FUR Figure column of this table .
.. . _ ._ . ...~_... .. .... ._._._. .. .~....
2.13 .6 .3 .2-9 -TAS-03-15 Rev The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section ILA.5 (i .e-(Revised per Attach 4 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F1-2004-11096) PUR Figure column of this table .
13 6 .3 0 CN-TAS 63-15 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAIR and .. ... .. 50,59 Review Form -Section II .A.5 (i.e .,
(Revised Pe r Attach 4 LTR-TAS-04-1134 Rev specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to PUR Figure column of this table .
2 W3F1-2004-0096) .___
.13 .6 .3 .2-1 CN-TAS-03-15 Rev1- . ^ The changes are covered by the EPU LAR-and ~ . 50 .59 Review Form Section H .A.5 (Revised per Attach 4 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F1-2004-0096) PUR Figure column of this table .
2.13 .6,3 .2-1__ 2 0 5 Re The changes are covered by the EP-U LAIR and . . 50 .59 Review Form Section f .A .5 (i.,
.e LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAIR approval) to W3171 -2004-0096) FUR Figure column of this table .
Deleted ~ CN-TAS-03-15 Rev With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were loss 50 .59 Review Farm Section ILA .5 (i .e .,
LTR-T AS-0 4-22, Rev 2 figures than with the original analysis . dependent on LAR approval) 1.....T .
CN-TAS-03-15 Rev With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were loss 50 .59 Review Forni Section II .A .5 (i-.e .,
L.TR-TAS-04-22, Rev 2 figures than with the original analysis . dependent on LAR approval)
- ... _ ..~ ._. .,. . . ..... ... ...__. ... . .... . .-.__... .... ... . .. . .. _. ............,,
CN-TAS-03-15 Rev 1 With he new analysis for section 15,6 there were less ~~. .50 .59 -Review -Form - Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-22, Rev 2 figures than with the original analysis. dependent on L .AR approval)
CN-TAS-03-15 Rev 1 With the new analysis- for section 1-5 .6 there were less 511 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (Le .^, .
LTR-TAS-04-22, Rev 2 figures than with the original analysis, dependent on LAR approval)
TA 0 5 Re 1 With the new analysis for section 1-5.6 there were less T 50 .59 Review Form Sectionif V .A .5 (i .e-LTR-TAS-04-22, Rev 2 figures than with the original analysis. dependent on LAIR approval)
_CN-TAS- ._ 1
.-03 .5 Rev 1 With the new analysis for section 15 .6 -there-were less 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (Le .,
LTR-TAS-04-22, Rev 2 figures than with the original analysis . dependent on LAR approval)
CN-TAS-03-15 Rev 1 .. . With the new analysis for section 1- 5 .6 there were fess 50 .59 Review Form Section ILA .s(f - .e .,
LI-101-01, Rev . 5
Table 3 Affected FSAR Figures Nature of Changes Supporting Calculation/Document(s) 50 .59 Review Category Made to the FSAR LTR-TAS-04-22, Rev 2 figures than with the original analysis . vdependent on LAR approval)
CN-TAS-03-15 Rev 1. With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were less 50 .59 Review Fond Section II .A .5 (f .e .,
LTR-TAS-04-22, Rev 2 figures than with the original analysis . dependent on LAR approval)
C_ ._. 1 N -TAS-03-15 Rev e 'T With the ^ new analysis for section 15 .6 there were less 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
figures than with the original analysis . dependent on LAR approval) .
_5-6-33
._- ._ - . Previously
._._. ._... ._- Deleted
... .. . _.~ ____ NIA NIA 5,6-34 Previously Deleted N/A N/A reviousty Deleted
~"_- .. .. .. ~ _. N/A T N/A N/A
..._B 2 .12-1~ ON-OA-02-58 Rev 0. ._APP Fig 15 .6-36 The changes are covered by the EPU^ LAR and _... .. 50 .59 Review Form Section II.A .54 (i .e .,
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table .
_ g. . ..1_5 37 .
CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 APP .Fig .6" The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and . . . ..~ 50 .59 Review Form Section 11.A .5 ( ¬ .e .,~
specifically the figures fisted in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App B Fig 15 .6-38 ~WThe changes area covered by theW EPU~LAR and 50 .59 .-Review Form Section f .A . 5 (l .e .,~
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on L_AR approval)
PUR f=igure column of this table .
CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App B Fig 15 .6-39 changes are covered y he P AR and .-50 .59 ..Review Form Section II .A,5 (i .e .,
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
C .-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App B ...Fig15 .6-40 . . . The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and - 50 .59 Review Form Section H .A .5 (i .e .,
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App B Fig 15 .6-41 I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and _ .50,59~Review Form Section IIA .5 (i .e .,
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
¬ PUR Figure column of this table .
~.. .. . . ..e- . .. . - . . . .._ ..
CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App L3 Fig 15 ..6-42W. The changes
. ... .s are covered by the EPU LAR~and 50.59 Review Form ^Section ILA .5 (i .e .,
specifically the figures listed to the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App B Fig 15 .6-43 The changes are covered by the EPU L.AR and 50 .59 Review Form Section ILA .5-(Le,,. .
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table . . ._ ..
The changes are covered by the EPU - LAR and -_ ~y50 .59 Review Form ^ Section II .A .5 (i .e,,
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
U-101-01, Rev. 5
Page 62 of 83 Tabb 3 Affected FSAR Figures Figure Supporting EPU Nature of Changes No . Supporting Calculation/Document(s) 50 .59 Review Category PU R Figure' Made to the FSAR 15 .6-45 2 .12-10 CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App B Fig 15.6-45 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section H,A.5 {i .e .,
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAP approval)
App . PUR Figure column of this tab le .
15,6-46 CN-QAOW58 Rev 0 .B Fig 15A46 The changes are covered by the LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section HAI {in, specifically the figures listed h he Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
15 .6-47 2 .12-12 CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 Ape B Fig 15 .6-47 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59- Review ' Formc on specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
15 .6-48 CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App B Fig 15 .6-48 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section 11,A,5 (i .e .,
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
R Figure column of this table .
15 .6- 49 CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App 8 Fig 15 .6-49 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section flAb (im, specifically the figures listed in the Supporting FPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
15 .6-50 1 2 .12-15 CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App B Fig 15 .6-50 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section ll .k5 (i .e .,
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
15 .6- 51 2 .12-16 - . .A. ,--02-58 Rev &App B
~"-"O 5 .6 51 changes am covered by the EPU LAR and g 50,59 Review Form Sedbn HAI (im, specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
15 .6-52 2 .12-17 -0208 Rev 0 App ----------
B Fig 15 .6-52 The changes are covered by the EFU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section HAI Om, specMcally the figures listed in he Supporting EPU dependent an LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
15 .6-53 ,12-18 CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App B Fig 15 .6-53 The changes are covered by the EPU t AR and 50 .59 Review Form Section UAI (i .e .,
specifically the figures listed W the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
15,6-54 Ti,1,-2---l CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App B Fig 15,6-54 The, changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section 11A .5 (i,e,,
specifically the figures 90d in we Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
2.'i ---- --------- -
--.111.111-11 1,5151- 12-20 CIA-¬)A-Q2-58 Rev 0 App B Fig 15 .6-55 The changes are covered by the EPU t .AR and 50 .59 Review Form Section HAI (i,e,,
specifically the figures Ated 0 Me Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
15 .6----------1-2 .12-2
.... - CN-OAT558 Rev 0 App B Fig 15 .6-56 The changes are covered by he EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section HAI Qw, specifically the figures listed in the Supporting FPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table .
CN-QA0208 Rev 0 App B Q 11057 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section ILAI (i .e .,
OW10t Rev . 5
Page 63 of 83 Table 3 Affected FSAR Figures
_.. . ~ .. ~_ ._-.__
N ature of Changes ._ . ._
Supporting Calculation/Document(s) 50 .59 Review Category Made to the FSAR
_.._~
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU _ .. dependentt~on~LAR approval)_
FUR Figure column of this table .
. .. . N OA-2=5 . .~4 B
C Q8 Q0Rev App Fig 15 .6-5 8 The changes are covered by the EPULAR ~ and 50.59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR , Figure column of this table . W-W. . . ..
_. . __ .._ . . ..._ . _._ . ._ . __._ .__ .._ _.. . .~ __ .._ . . ._.. . .
CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App B Fig 15 .6-59 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and .-5Q .59 Review Form Section 91A .5 (i .e .,
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
CN- _ PUR Figure column of this table . ...m -------- --- ---
OA-02-58Rev 0 App_- B Fig 15 .6-60 .~ The changes are coveredby ^ the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
specifically the figures fisted in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
.. .... -CA--2=S8. _ . ~.._. ~ m _ - .. ..
C 0 Rev 0AppB Fig 156-61 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR ^ and . . .. ... . . .50-59 Review Form Sectionl1 ^ .A .5 (i .e .,
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
(;N-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App B Fig 15 .6-62 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section fI- .A .5 (l .e_
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
_ Fig . : . -
CN-OA-02-58 Rev g App B 15 6 63 The changes are covered by. the E-PU LAR and . . 50.59 Review Form -.Section ILA ..5 (i .e .,
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
I,
.. . _. T FUR Figure column of this table .
C .N-OA-02-588 Rev 0 App B Fig 15 .6-64 The changes are covered by them EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
CN-OA-02-58 Rev Cl App B Fig 15_T- 6 65 T..T The changes are coveredby .the EPU LAR and ..' . 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A.5 (i .e .,
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent or) LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
CN O 02 58 Rev 0 App B Fig 15 .6-66 The changes are covered by the. EPU LAR and . 50.59 Review Form Section iI .A .5 (i .e-specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table .
CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App B Fig 15 .6-6 7 7 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and--__ 50 .59 Review Form Section^ ILA.5 (Le-specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
(.N-OA-02-a8 Rev 0 App 6 Fig 15 .6-68 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and T .. 50 .59 Review Form Section lf .A .5 ^(Le ., V J
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table -.
50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .,
.e CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App B. Fig 15 .6-69 T The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
LI-101-01, Rev . 5
able 3 Affected FSAR Figures Figure Supporting EPU Nature of Changes Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
No . PUR Figure Made to the FSAR UR Figure column of this table .
15 .6-70 2 .12-35 ~~ . _.CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App B Fig 15 .6-7(} ^_ changes are covered .The bythe EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section (e ,
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
_ .,G 15 .6-71 PUR Table -OA-02-58 Rev 0 App B Fig 15 .5-71 The changes are . covered by the t:PU LAR and T 5 ¬3 .59 Review Form Section IA.S L (i .e .,
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on L.AR approval)
FUR Figure column of thi s table .
15 .6-72 Previously Deleted N/A 15 .6-73 Previously Deleted N/A 15 .6-74 Previously Deleted N/A 15 .6-75 Previously Deleted NIA 1
15 .6-76
.77. .... . . . Previously Deleted 15 .6- Previously Deleted NIA 15 78 1 Previously Deleted N/A N/A J 15 .6- 79 Previously Deleted
. -N IA 115 .6- 84 i . .. Previousfy Deleted ... . ..... NIA, . .. ......_.__. ..._. ....._. ._ ...._ _ .
15 .6-81 Previously. Deleted NIA 15 .6- 82 Previously Deleted N IA NIA NIA. .._. .,.
15,6- 8 3 Previously Deleted N/A N/A-~~ - NfA__. _ ..W 15,6-84 Previously Deleted N/A N/A 15,6-85 Previously Deleted N/A NIA ..
15 .6-86 _ Previously Deleted NIA "`
15,6-87 Previously Deleted NfA NIA W ._
15 .6-88 . ^,Previously Deleted NIA 1 NIA 15 .6-..89 Previously Deleted NIA N/A 15 .6- 90 I Previously Deleted NlA NIA-_
15 .6- 91 Previousfy Deleted N/A N/A NIA 0 . ... . . . . _
15 .5-92 Deleted CN-OA-02-58 Rev With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were less 50 .59 Review Farm Section II_A .5 (i .e . ,
figures than with the original analysis . dependent
. . ..59 on LAR approval) 15 .6- 93 Deleted ( CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there--------------------
were Iess-- 5Q Review Form Section 11 .A .5^(i .e . ,
figures than with the original analysis . dependent on LAR approval) 0, 5,6-94 CN- OA-02 -58 Rev 0 ~ With t he new analysis for section 15 .6 there we re less 50 .59 Review Form Section H .A .5(i m .e .,,
LI-1 ¬11-01, Rev . 5
._~..~~~~~ .~.~~~~.~_~~ ~~~.~.. ..~~ . ~. ..~.~~~~ ....... . .. . . ..
~~~
_ __ _ _ ~ARFUu~s A. ~@d.~~~~~~m@~
mpm~~~Aown~ ~- .~~~~~gCm~ml~ mom\\A~~ ~an~s ~om~va~@pR
~R mgme . . . ¥~ e & me ~~R
~ %~~~~~I~~~~~ags~~~ ~~~-~edy~~\%~/~i~~~~
S: ~ ~ U~~~~ ~~~ ~~\~~ m~v ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ \\~\nomsir<<+n ~ $m/wraw /Emuv\~r~ km \/~( .~
_ _ _ +ues~b nw h_me <<gi ~aR~y k de#dmlm ~ Ra<<~ q
!\\ m ~ ~~ +ed ~ ~~~~ cy~ \~ /§n \ ~ ~~~~ /mln + +\ m~s ~ m+/-m1 Bm+/-/w~ ~a ~ /~ vw~ A ~ a\~!: ~ G,
`>>gur banwhme~%m~aG~ y& d7mdmlm ~R7p ~}
4~-7~ ~+~~~~~~ ~~~- //~}\ ~~~~~~~ ~m\/m>a~~s~~ 3mj5a\//~ m~ & ¢q~~w~~ ~Gm \%~ G\
_ _ <<umslGn~ h!~ o__#Rlaa~y y +&We% m ~ R +~ ~_)
]s: \a~~~~d~~~~~ ~~\~~\ate ~~~~~~~~~~ Amt mw m~~ r~\m~/Bee/m~e~~\mRmi (~~y+dUS§ :
- +ur mm whmeo§m~am~y& d+mamlm~ RaR~ v}
~~@~ ~k~~~~ .~ ~~o~a- Rm~ ~ ~~~~~_ ~\ $~ e a~\~ \r &+n o m\/_r ash /(~/~~ >> \<<W~~ ~i /
&umsmm ~ bbe <<%nma~y y aAke9 m EARaR~ u >
~~ d m o~ \d~~~~~~ ~%~3~\R<</~~ ~~~~~ Wm \\nw m~\se mwm~.~ ///~ ~ s~/\m~v\~ m~d\~~ 3~ ,
_ ~+u~ ~an~h~b oWaman~y& ~d~ mamlm~R+KGg}
g: ~\ ~U~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~~2-\(q~~~~ ~~~~ ~i~~ ew >>\atee~+~ \at m w mi e ~ m~ v /~~ ~ dm \/§Km\
_ <<uaamm ~hme~&nlmas . +WWemen~ Ra>>r q
~s:~ ~~~~d~~~~~/moo\3\a~vo~~~~~~~~~,Amt mem~s~ra\\~~~m~\@e~ \\~v>>~~/~~~&~~ ;
_ ~<<ue&mm ~hmeoq~m~aq~w<< dAmdmlm ~ R +~ v ! ,
~:\m~ ~/d~~.~~\\~~-\B~/o~~~~~~~~~~~lh~ \~~ a~~~ km\%~ke _~ a/~~g~v/~A~am \&~:
...~~~~~.~~.~~~ ~~~~ \~~\mw\\e~/~a~~I ~._ . .,+#<<eMm~\+/dq S : 4~ ~ +~ CN~~~2aa~vo ~\~F ne a~y\\rmgm~ B\ee_edms ~ m\~~~ r \ei //\%\ .
__ _ ~Wu~ ~hn~h~F oWi ~ma~y<< d~ mamlmL<<R<<~ qQ '
}~mm \~\d~~~ ~~~~/+/-~ q~vo~ ~~ ~ ~~~Am~ +wm~s~ mWmls~ <<\w\W~ \\m~ ~w~/m\~\d\&5K~\
_ +umam+.~. ~Bme~%nm
~~ .~. m~~.
~~_ .. . +&Wemon~ Ra<<_q
..~ ~.~~~~~,~.
~s: m\ ~ +~~~~~ CN-~~ 3a~ vo Am menu aG~y G %rmam ,%B\e w~~9 +.m ~Cew~ r s dm n : 5%~ .
_ Gumsmm ~ h!k o+~lam~y << dew km~m ~R +pv}
~ s mZ ~~Rd~~ .~~ ~~~>>~\e\<<~~~~~~~~ ~~ <<~mt m~ ma~~ +~ n\~ <<w ~m~ &~~\~v/~A/<<kn~ /)+/-,
.~.~..~.... ~..~.~~..~~.~~~~.~<<uaamm w hmea§n2 maa<<
..~~~~.~~~~~~_~.~~.~. ~ +#<<eM m L%Ra<<~m)
~EG :m D~and CND~~ ae~ v0 Am menu matey & mr&~i ~Eebee~ m~ \ \~ m~\~ 7 \~\d~ 3 K~
_ _ Wuaslbn_whme<<%G~ ma~ y<< _ _~d<<mamlm~ R7~m§
,~2 mg o \k~~~~~\~~~&-/q R<<~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ /A\ %~/w m~ %~ ~wont~ Gm ~ m is ~ a 9~v _~\mom dm~ \~ G,
_ ' _ _ ~k ;m .m_anwh~h oWbm ma_~y& &&We%on~ R+tea§_
~6 9/ O~ %~~~~~~~~/~o~ a~ /~ ~~~ ~~~ w+t m_ >>~s~~~~ ~~~~ ~m~ s~ o§R~////m~~~i*~ a
_ _ _ _ Gumamanw hme~&n*aR~ y m aemkmlm LAR +~ a5
~s/~y~~~k\d ~~~~~~~~A-~ a~}0 ~~~ ~~~~/h%\mw ma s~rmGm ~ie~ m _mom\ ~m ~~w~ A ~+/-m \&5\~~
<<ues mm ~h$e <<gam ~am~y & +#Wem m ~Ra<<~q LdW@t~ws
5¬) .59 REVIEW FORM Table 3 Affected FSAR Figures Figure Supporting EPU Nature of Changes Supporting CalculationiDocument(s) 50 .59 Review Category No . PUR Figure' Made t o the FSAR
--.~~ __._. ._ . .. .
15,6-112 Deleted CN-OA-02-68~Rev 0 With the new V analysis - for section 15 .6 there were less - .50 .59 Review Form Section ii .A .5 (i .e .,
figur es than wit h the original ana lysis . dependent on LAR approval)
Y.CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 W With the new analysis for secton 15 .6 there were less i 50 .59 Review Form Section il .A .5 (i_e_
figures t han with the orig inal analysis . dependent on LAR approval)
CN-OA-02--58 Rev 0 With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were less 50.59 Review Form SectionIl - .A .5 (i.e .,
figures than with the or iginal analysis . dependent on LAR approval) 15 .6- 115~ ' ..- Deleted .. ...._ 'vCN-OA-02-58 Rev 0~ With the new analysis for section 5 .6 ^there were less figures than with the original analysis . d epend ent on LAR approval)
CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 ¬ With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were less 50 .59 Review Form Section [I .A .5-(i .e .,
figure s than with the origin al analysis . dependent on LAR approval)
CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0- .. With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were less 50 .59 Review Form Section iI .A .5 (i .e .,
figures than with the original analysis . dependent on LAR approval) m Section fl-Deleted CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 With the now analysis for section 15 .6 there were less .,
.e
.-5-(i
.A 50 .59 ReviewForm -
E figures than with the original analysis . dependent on LAR approval)
Previously Deleted-NIA .
_Previously Deleted NIA NIA N/A ._ . .._
.. .. ._ . ._ . . _T . .. . .. ._-
_ .--l-. __. .... .. ... .... ...... .. .. ... .... . .. . . .... . ..... . . . ...... ... ._ . ... .. .
Previously Deleted NIA NIA-. .._...
. NlA^
Previously Deleted NIA N/A
.. . . ._~
15 .6-123 Previously Deleted .. .. .,. . N/A 15 .6-124 Previously Deleted N/A "I
15 .6-125 viously Deleted NIA _
_.__._ ._,_. ._. ._ ., ,_, .__ .._ ... .__... e__._...._
et .... N/A NIA 15 .6- 126 Previously Deleted N /A - NIA 15 .6- ..127 Previously Deleted N/A N/A 15 .6-128 28 Deleted CN-OA-02-58 ~Rev 0 - ... ~ . With the now analysis for section 15 .6 there were less 50 .59 Review Form Section il.A .5 (i .e .,
figures than with the original analysis . dependent on LAR approval)
Previously Deleted N/A NIA 15 .6-130 Previously Deleted N IA N/A 15 .6-131 Previously Deleted N/A N/A 15 .6- 132 Previously Deleted N/A .__ .....__.. . N/A 15 .6- ..133 Previously Deleted. . . .NIA_.... NIA 1 ... . .. ._
15 .6- 34 _. Previously Deleted -. ._ ...._ IA~..._ . .. . . .. . NIA 15 .6- 135 Previously Deleted NIA N/A 1-1-101-01, Rev . 5
Table 3 Affected._.. . FS AR Figu res
_ ._. _.___~_ ...
Figure Supporting EPU ature of Change --
Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
- o. RUF2 Figure' ade to the FSAR 115,6-136 Previously Deleted NIA NfA 1 N/A 15 .6-137 Previously Deleted -N/A . NIA 15 .6-138 Previously Deleted --NIA _- N/A Previously Deleted Previously Deleted_....
5 .6- 141 Previously Deleted NIA,..___ . .. ...... ... _.
15_6- 142 Previously Deleted NIA 15 .6-143 . Previously
. DeletedNIA 15 .6-144 Previously
_- Deleted NIA NIA . ._ . ._ .. _ _.~ _ . ._.e ___
15,6-145 Previously Deleted . .. .. . ¬ N/A NIA Previously Deleted N/A N/A ^ ....___
Previously Deleted NlA - .. ._ .. ._~ ._ .
15 .6- 148 Previously Deleted NIA - jN/A . . ....W 15 .6149 Previously Deleted ; NIA NIA
.^Previously Deleted ^^ .~ NIA`_
Previously Deleted ; NIA Previously Deleted NIA N/A NIA
. Deleted CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were less 50 .59 Review Form Section ILA .5 (i .e .,
figures than with the original analysis . dependent on LAR approval)
CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 ' With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were loss 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A.5 (i .e,,
_.. . .. . . .._ . .____.. ._~ ._ _.. _..._.-_ ._. ~_ .. .
figures than withf the ^original analysis. ... . .__, dependent on LAR approval)
CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 _With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were less 50 .59 Review Form Section fl .A .5 (i .e .,
figures than with the original analysis . dependent on LAR approval)
CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 j With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were less 50 .59 . Review Form Section II .A.5 (i .e .,
figures than with the original analysis . dependent on LAR approval)
__. . .....,.__ ... . ...... .._.... . _ .. .,_.. .._ _ :. ... ..~ ..__ . _,_ _. .. ._.,-
CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 ; With thenew ^ analysis for section ^s..
15 .6 there were le . 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
_. ._ . i figures than with the original analysis . dependent on LAR approval)
CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were less 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e_,
figures than with the original analysis . dependent on LAR approval)
CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 L With the new analysis for section 15,6 there were le=ss . 0 .59 Review Form Section ll .A .5 (i .e,,
figures than with the original analysis . dependent on LAR approval)
With the new analysis for sectio n 15 .6 there were less 50.59 Review Form Section 11A .5 (i .e .
Li-101-01, Rev . 5
Page 68 of 83 Table 3 .
Affe cted FSA R Figures Figure Supporting FPU a Nture of Changes Supporting Calculation/Document(s) 50 .59 Review Category No . PUR Figure' Ma de to the FSAR 9 es than wit h the original analysis . dependent on LAR approval) 15 .6-161 Previously Deleted
15,6-162 ... . 4 Previously Deleted NIA 15,6-163 Previously Deleted 15 .6-164 Previously Deleted 15,6-165 Previously Deleted 15 .6- 166 PreviouslyDeleted ~ . ...~ .
'15 .6,-_.167- Previously------ Deleted 15 .6-168 Previously Deleted W, N/A 15 .6- 169 ~Deleted CN-DA-04-20 Rev 0 With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were less 50 .59 Review Form Section IIA .5 (i .e,~,
figures than with the original analysis . dependent on LAR approval)
-.IJ._ ...e.Eeted 15 .6- .970 CN-OA-04-20 Rev a With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were less 50 .59 Review Form Section H .A .5 (i .e_
_ figures than with the origi nal analysis . dependent on LAR approval)
.--e-_____
15 .6-171 Delet d CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less 1 0 .59 Review FVorm ..Section ll .A .5 (i .e .,
. ..CN-OA-04 figures than with the original analysis . dependent on LAR approval) 15 .6 172 Deleted 4 20 Rev 0 Kth ^ the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were less . ^50 .59 Review Form Section Ii .A .5 (i .e .,
-... figures than with the original analysis . dependent on LAR approval) 156 Deleted CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were less 50 .59 Review Form Section ILA .5 (i .e .,
.. . _. .i ._.._ . . . . .. . . tiqures than with t he origin al anal ysis . dependent on LAR approval) 15 .6- 174 eeted CN-OA-04-20 ~Rev 0~.-.- With the new analysis for^section 15 .6 there were less 50 .59ReviewForm m Section II,A,5 (i .e .,
.. figures than with the original analysis . dependent on LAR approval) 1 - 5 .6- 175 .,Delete d CN-OA-04-20 Rev Q With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were less 50.59 Review Form Section Ii .A .5 (i .e .,
. . . . ._- _ _ figures
~ ._... . .than
..._. . . .. . .. wit
..__ h the ori ginal
- . . . ._.. analysis
__ . r __ _
.... .... .__ dependent on LAR approval)
_ . _. .._ . ._ ._.~-l-15 . 6 176 - . . Deleted CN-OA-04_ .~20 Rev 0 With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were ----------
less------- - 50 .59^ Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
.1.7.. . . ... . ... . . . __ . . ... . .... _ .. .... ... ._ I figures than,.. with the original analysis dependent on LAR approval) 15 .6__ ._W36'--2-0'04-0052 CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 ------ Figure was revised to reflect revised Smalf Break 50 .59 Review Form -Section II.A .5 (i .e .,
Attach 5 Sect 2. .12_4 LTR-OA-04-77 Rev 2 LOCA analysis . The changes are covered by the EPU dependent on LAR approval)
LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting .
EPU F UR Figu re column of this table .
15 .6-178 No Change I N/A NIA No 15_6-_179
..C hangs ^ . ...~ NIA INIA_
15 .6-180 No Change NIA ._
15.6- ..18_1_ .. No Change NIA LI-101-01, Rev . 5
Table 3 Affected FSAR Figures
... _ .__ ~ .. ..._ .~ . _ .~._... .~ .._. . . _ . . ._.._-._. .. .._ . ._. .____._.. ._.T _ ._. . .. ...-. .__._. .. ._ .__.~_. _ . _
Figure Supporting FPUm Nature of Changes v Supporting Calculation/Document(s) 50 .59 Review Category No . FUR Figure t
Made to the FSAR
.. .____._.. ._ - ~ . .....~_.__ __ .~ . .._W~ ._ ......-_.____ _ .... . .- .... ._._ . . ._ . . .____~___._ ._. . .~ ._ ._ .__
15 .6-182
__ .. .No Change- _ N/A fN/A .-. tVlA~_
15 .6-183 - No Change . .__ N/A NIA N/A
. . .... W .____ .._ .. . _-W .... -. . . .. .~ . . . .. ._ . ___ ___~ .._ .__
15
_ .6- 18 No_ Change
__. N/A _ N/A -_-_ ... ..W NIA
. ~ .m_ . ..~ ... . .__ _ .._ . _.... .-._~__. ..__ ._
15 .6-185 No_.__ Change ._N/A N/A N/A
-_ .-~ _., . _ ..... .. .., _ _ . . ., . ,~__ . . .. _.W . .._..,_- .,W __ .-... ., . .., ~_ . .... ... .__-,_ . . _,__._ .. .,_ . . . __ __,. .._ ._ ____.-.,.. . . .,_.- . .. ....,. ...~ _, .,_,.,. __,., .. ., ., . .. ..,
15 .6 86 V Deleted ON-OA-02-58 Rev 0 With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were less. . 50 .59 Review Form Section ILA .5 (i .e .,
figures than with the o rigina l analysis, dependent on LAR approval)
- m.
15,6-187 Deleted CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were less 50 .59 Review Farm Section ILA.5 (i .e .,
__ figures than with the original analysis . dependent on LAIR approval) 15 .6- m188 Deleted CN-OA 58 Rev 0 ^ With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were Iess 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A:5 ( ¬ ,
figures than .. with dependent on LAR approval)
_ . .__ __~ ___._ .__ _ .. . .... .. ._-_ . .. .. . ._~___ .~_,_.._.___~ ...._ ., .-._ .,. .______ . . ..._ .- ___ ..,. . . ..- .._. .. . the __. ._o.. rigina l analysis, .. _ . _~
15 .6-189 Deleted CN OA-02-58 Rev 0 the new analysis for section 15 .6 there - ----------were ----------- less 50,59
Review .. ... ....Form Section II .A.5 (i .e .,
. figures than with the original analysis . dependent
_ - . .. . . . on . . LAR approval) _, .,~, .. . ._ __ . . . _ ._
15 .6-190 Deleted . .GN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 ? With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were less 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A.5 (i .e .,
figures on LAR approval) _
. . . .... than _with the original ., ..,_,_ . ana lysis, dependent
__ _. _ . . .. . . . .- _. . ._ .. ._____ ., . .,. ., ..-_.._, . ...__~__ .. .. ... .~. .. . . ..., .~ ., - ..,._. . .~_, . . .. .. ... .. T .... __ _ . .. . . .__~__ .._ . _
15 .6-191 Deleted c CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were less 50 .59 Review Form Section fl .A .5 (i .e .,
_ dependent an LAR approval)_
_ ... . . - ._., ..._.- ._-.. .. ._. r _ . . ._. ...-_ .. ...- ., ~ . figuresthan with the
_. _ _, ..... . _ . . ... - .. ._.... . . .., -_. ., ._ ..,.original ,.. . _ analysis-15.6-192 Deleted . CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 .a. .'With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were less 50 .59 Review Form Section ILA.5 (i .e .,
figures than with the origina l analysis . dependent on t AR approval)
_.~-_.. . ._ . ~_.._._ _ . . .. . . , ... . . .. ____ ._... _.._ .-_._ ...________. .. .._.~_.. ._ ..__.__. . .. . ... ._ . . ... . ._- _ . ... . .._~ . ._.. _.__. ... ..~ _ .. .. ..._ . .. . .._. ... __ . . ._ . . . ._ . _.. .. ... .. .. _ ___.. _-_ ... .
5.6 93 Deleted CN OA-02-58 Rev 0 With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were less , 50 .59 Review Form Section 11,A.5 (i .e .,~
_ . . .. .. . . . ... - . _ ._ _.,. . ~ ._ .. . .,_ . ...__ ___. ...__ - __ _ .. . . . ' figures m. .
than with., ._ the .._-_, ._ .,_
orig inal a nalysis ..__ _ . ..
. . ~.
dependant on LAR approval) 15 .6-194 . Deleted CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 ' With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were less 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,_
figures than with the original analysis, dependent on LAR approval)
. ..__... _ _ .. .r___ _, ... ._, .,-.. ..._ _------_,.,-.-I`---- . . `_. .____-_._ . .. ... ,__--l- _ _ .__._.
15 .6-195 Deleted CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were less 50 .59 Review Form Section ILA .5 (i .e ., l figures
-_ .__ .. than with the original analysis . dependent
.. _ .. . .... . __.._ . . __._ . . ._ .~.__._ . ._ _ .._~ _ _.. . . _ ._~ . .. .. ._, _ _ .__- .. ..__~_ .. . . .. . _ . ...._._on _LAR ..._ . . approval) .____ . .._ .. .... ._.-
15 .6- 196 Deleted .CN-OA-02-58 .- Rev 0 With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were less . . ..50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
~.__ ... ._ ___ .-._.._. .._._._ _ . .. -. ._.W~_. .. . . .__ figures .~. . . .. than ._~with the._original . ._~_. analysis . _ dependent .. on LAR
- ... .. . . . _. ...-~-. ~ . ._ . . . . .._ . . ._ . .__T~ ... _ ..~ ._ . .--__ .._.._ . . . . ....._ ..... ..._ .-__ . .. . . . . ----- _.. .. .. ._ .approval)
.. ~_. .. . . . ._-- _ . ._ . ._
05 .6-197 Deleted CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were less 50 .59 Review Form Section H .A .5 (i .e .,
figures than with the original analysis . dependent on LAR approval) 15 .6-198 -- Deleted CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 ^With the new analysis for section 95 .6 there were, less 50 .59 Review Form Section Ii .A .5 (i .e_ :,
figures
- . . . . . than with .the ... . original analysis . dependent on LAIR approval)
.. ... _------- _. . ... .- . . . . . .. __ .... _ .. .. .. ._ __. ._. . . - . ._. . ._~ .. . . . .__ _ ....... . .....- ~. .. ...-~_ .. ._._` __... . . . . . . .. .. . _ . ... . ... _ . ._ .... . .-._._
15 .6-19g Deleted CN-OA 02-58 Rev 0 With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were less .. . . .50 .59 Review Four; Section ILA .5 (i .e .,
figures than with the original analysis, dependent on LAR approval) 15-6-200 Deleted CN OA-02-58 Rev 0 With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were less 50 .59 Review Form Section II A 5 (i .e .,
__ __ ..~_. ~__ . . ._. ` -. . .. . . .. . . l figures than with the original analysis. pendent on LAIR approval)
LI-101-01, Rev- 5
50 .59 REVIEW FORM Table 3 Affected FEAR Figures Figure -.. . Nature of Changes 50 .59 Review Category No . Made to the FSAR 15 .6-201 With the new analysis for section 1-a.6 there were less 50 .59 Review Form Section . ILA .5 (i .e .,
figures than with the original analysis . dependent on LAR approval) 15 .6-202 ~.. With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were less figures than with the original analysis . __5dependent on LAR approval) 0 .59
-15 .6- 203^_. Deleted With them new analysis for section 15,6 there were less Review Form Section il .A .5 (i .e .,
figures than with the original an alysis . dependent on LAR approval)
.a. ._. . ---------------
15 .6-..204 Deleted CN-OA-02-58 _Rev With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were less 50 .59 Review Form Section fI .A .5 (i .e_
figures than wit h the original analysis . dependent. on LAR approval) 5 .6 205 Deleted CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 With the new analysis for section 15 .6 there were less 50 .59 Review Form Section ILA .5 (i,e .,
figures than with the ori ginal analysis . dependent on LAR approval) 15 .6- 206 . W 3 F 1-2004-0052 ._- ._ CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 15 .6-206 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form &? : :tion II .A .5 (i .e .,
Attach 5, Fig 2 .12-52 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
15 .6- ..2017 W 3 F 1-2004-0052 - - CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 15 .6-207 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and- 50 .59 Review Form Section ILA.5 (k! .,
Attach 5, Fig 2 .12-53 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Fioure column of this table .
3F 1-2.004-0052 CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 15.6-208 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and~~~ T 50 .59 Review Form Section 1i .A .5 (i.e .,
Attach 5, Fig 2 .12-54 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on t .AR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
3 2004 0052 CN-OA-04-20-..Rev 0 - Fig - '15 .6-209 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 1 50 .59 Review Form Section tf .A .5 (Le,,,
Attach 5, Fig 2 .12-55 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
~- .___
W3 F 1-2004-0052 . . _ .. .CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 1 5. .6_210 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section tl .A .5 (i .e .,
Attach 5, Fig 2 .12-56 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
W3F1-2004-0052 CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 -FL9_.. 15 .6-217 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section ILK5(i .,e .,
Attach 5, Fig 2 .12-57 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
_. . PUR Figure colum n of this table .
..Fig . . . . . _- .3.
3 1 2004 (3052 C N-O 20 Rev -0q 15 .6-212 Thechangesarecovered W ~~ by the EPU LARand
-- ---^ -~ 50 .59 Review Form Section 11-A .5 (i .e .,
Attach 5, Fig 2 .12-58 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) i PUR
_ Figure column of this table .
..-_. ~ ~ _ .___ . . . ._ . . ._ . .__ . .__- ..
W3F1-2004-005 -. .. ~CN OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 15 .6-213 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR andFm . . . . . - .. . ...^, .50 .59-Review--Form Section 11 .A .5~(i .e .,
Attach 5 Fig 2 .12-59 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting PU dependent on LAR approval)
PU R F igure column of this table .
W3F1-2004-0052 CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 15 .6-214 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II,A .5 (i .e .,
Attach 5, Fig 2 .12-36 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
Li-101-0'1, Rev . 5
Page 71 of 83 uTable 3W~
Affected FSAR Fi gures igure Supporting EPU - .. . Nature of Changes Supporting Calculation/Document(s) 50 .59 Review Category No . PUR Figure 1 Made to the FSAR 15.6-215 .. W3F1-220-04-005.2 CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0~Fig 15 .6-215 .. . The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and .. ..^ . 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 .(i .e .,
Attach 5, Fig 2 .12-37 specifically the figures fisted in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column o f this table .
15 .6-216 W3F1-2004-0052 - .__ CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 15 .6-216 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
Attach 5, Fig 2 .12-38 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
5 217 004-00-b-2 CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 15 .6-217 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and~T 50 .59 Review Form Section ILA .5 (i .e , .
Attach 5 Fig 212-39 2-39 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
. ._ F-I,. 0. ... .. .._ .__
115 .6-21g 3 z0- 4 0g 52 CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 15 .6-218 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and - .^ . .._ 50 .59 Review Form Section W ILA .5 (Le,, . .
Attach 5, Fig 2 .12-40 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
.. . . _ _. . . .._ .__. .. . .-.__. ..~ .__ __-. .._ _-~__T ..... E PUR Figure column of this table, m ... .r 7 __ . . . ....- _
15 .6- 219 ._W3~F1-2004.-.00-52__ CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fia 15,6-219 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR_ and. . .. . . 50 .59 Review Form ^ Section P .A .5 (i .e .,
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table . ...... .
W3FII-2004-0052 1 CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 15 .6-2211 The changes are covered by .fhe EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form _Section II .A .5 (i .e ., ..
Attach 5, Fig 2 .12-42 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
, PUR Figure column of this table .
.. ._. . ._ ~ . .. ... . . . .._. .... _ . .... - .. .__. .. . . -_..
15 .6-221 W3F1-2004-0052 GN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 15 .6-227 ~ The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section~JI .A .5m (Le .,
Attach 5, Fig 2 .12-43 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
._-~- PUR .Figure column of this table- .. ..__
_. . ._ _._ ._ .._.-... ..__ .._-._ ..._ _ . --._ .~._ .
_ .~ . .. .._ ._.. _ _ ._. ____.__ . T_. . ..... .. .. , . .._. .. __ ., . . . . . . .......
"15 .6-222 3F1 -2004-0052 ON-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 15 .6-222 ~ The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
Attach 5, Fig 2 .12-44 I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
3 W 3F 1-2004-0052 . .CN-CA-04-20 Rev 0~Fig 15 .6-223~ .~ . . ...~ .....~ The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and ... . . 50 .59 Review Form Section ILA .5 (i .e .,
Attach 5, Fig 2 .12-45 specifically the figures fisted in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
, PUR Figure column of this table, .. .
-_ . . ._ .._ ..-. . ...~ . . . .- .. ._ ..- .-..._ . . . -_ .. ..__- _ .-_ .. . .. . ...._
115 .6-224 ^W 3 F 1-20(14-0052 CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 15 .6-224 'The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
Attach 5, Fig 2 .12-4ij j specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
. -._ -2. . . _
15 .6-225 . ^ W3 F 1-20074-0052 CN-OA_04 0 Rev a Fig15 .6-225 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section ILk5 (Le,,
Attach 5, Fig 2 .12-47 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table . .... . .
15 .6-226 W3F1-2004-0052 . CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 15 .6-226~. The changes are covered by the EPU~LAR and .~^ 50 .59 Review Form Section~II .A .5 (Le .,
Attach 5, Fig 2 .12-48 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent an LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of thi s table . ...- ._ .. ._
15 .6-227 W3F1-2004-0052 CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 15.6-227 . The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
LI-101-0 1, Rev . 5
Table 3 Affected FEAR Figures Figure Supporting EPU Nature of Changes Supporting Calculation/Document(s) 50 .59 Review Category No . PUR Figure Madeto the FSAR Aft Fig 2,U49 specMcaNy the figures listed in the Supporting EPLJ dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
Fig 15 .6-228 W3Fl-2004-0052 CA-000520 Rev 0 15AA28 The changes am covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section HA .5 (he .,
Attach 5 . Fig 2,12-50 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent an LAR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table, 15,6-229 W3FI-2004-0052 CN-0*0460 Rev 0 Q 15W29 The changes am covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section il .Ab On, Attach 5, Fig 2,12-51 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table . . ... .. .....
15 .6- 230 NOT IN FUR (This CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 1&6-230 This figure is not contained in the EPU LAR, however, 50,59 Review Form Section 11,A,5 {i .e .,
Figure plotted for the it is contained in calculation CN-OA-04-20 which was dependent on LAR approval) limiting 0 .055 ft break developed for the Small Break LOCA analysis and is size ody, see FSAR the bask far the Small: Break LOCA analysis presented Table 15 .6-16a) in the EPU LAR PUR, and therefore implicitly covered by the EPU LAR . This is additional information .
I 5 .6- 231 NOT IN PUR (This CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 15 .6-231 This figure is not contoured in the EPU LAR, however, 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
Figure plotted for the it is contained in calculation CN-OA-04-20 which was dependent on LAR approval) limiting 0 .055 ft break developed for the Small Break LOCA analysis and is size only, see FSAR the basis for the Small Break LOCA analysis presented Table 15546a) in the EPU LAR PUR, and therefore implicitly covered by the EPU LAR . This is additional information 15 .6-232 NOT IN PUR (This CN-DAM400 Rev (1 Fig 15AA32 This figure is not contained in the EPU LAR, however, 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
Figure plotted for the it is contained in calculation CN-OA-04-20 which was dependent on LAR approval) limiting 0 .055 ft break developed for the Small Break LOCA analysis and is size only, see FSAR the basis for the Small Break LOCA analysis presented Table 15lq6a) in the EPU LAR PUR, and therefore implicitly covered by the EPU LAR . This is additional information .
15 .6-233 NOT IN FUR (This CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 15 .6-233 This figure is not contained in the EPU LAR, however, 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 {i .e .,
Figure plotted for the it is contained in calculation CN-OA-04-20 which was dependent on LAR approval) 5miting 0 .055 ft break developed for the Small Break LOCA analysis and is size only, see FSAR the basis for the Small Break LOCA analysis presented Table 15 .6-16a) in the EPU LAR PUR, and therefore implicitly covered by the EPU LAR . This is additional information .
15,9_1 2 .13 .9 .1 .1-1 CN-TAS-02-78 Rev 0 App D Fig D-1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section 11,A,5 (i .e .,
LTR-RCPL-04-32, Rev 0 specifically the figures hod W the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
150-2 2 .13 .9 .1 .1-2 CN-TAS-02-78 Rev 0 App D Fig D-2 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section II .A .5 (i .e .,
LTR-RCPL-04-32, Rev 0 specifically the figures hod in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table, LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 L" 0 1TY Rev.5
50 .59 REVIEW FORM Page 73 of 83 Tabk 3 Affected FSAR Figures Figure Supporting EPU Nature of Changes Supporting Calculation/Document(s) 50 .59 Review Category No. PUR Figure 1 Made to the FSAR 151-3 2 .13 .9 2.1-4 CN-TAS-02-78 Rev 0 App D Fig D-1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section H .A .5 (i .e .,
LTR-RCPL-04-32, Rev 0 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
151-4 P2 A 3 A A A 0 CNAAS4248 Rev 0 App d Fig L7-3 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section JI .A .5 (i .e .,
LTR-RCPL-04-32, Rev 0 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table .
151-5 CN-TAS-02-78 Rev 0 App D Q D-5 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50 .59 Review Form Section =5 (ta, LTR-RCPL-04-32, Rev 0 ~ specifically the figures fisted in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
155 213011-6 CN-TAS-02-78 Rev 0 App D Fig D-6 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section ILA,5 (i .e .,
LTR-RCPL-04-32, Rev 0 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table .
Notes : 1 . Attachment 5 to Letter W3FI-2003-0074, Waterford 3 Extended Power Uprate Report, unless otherwise noted .
L"01&1, Rev . 5
Page 74 of 83 B. ENVIRONMENTAL SCREENING If any of the following questions is answered "yes," an Environmental Review must be performed in accordance with NMM Procedure EV-115, "Environmental Evaluations," and attached to this 50.59 Review . Consider both routine and non-routine (emergency) discharges when answering these questions.
Will the proposed Change being evaluated :
Yes No 1, Involve a land disturbance of previously disturbed land areas in excess of one acre (i .e .,
grading activities, construction of buildings, excavations, reforestation, creation or removal of ponds)?
- 2. [_ involve a land disturbance of undisturbed land areas (i .e ., grading activities, construction, excavations, reforestation, creating, or removing ponds)?
- 3. ] Involve dredging activities in a lake, river, pond, or stream?
- 4. [] Increase the amount of thermal heat being discharged to the river or lake?
- 5. Increase the concentration or quantity of chemicals being discharged to the river, lake, or air?
- 6. E Discharge any chemicals new or different from that previously discharged?
- 7. [ Change the design or operation of the intake or discharge structures?
- 8. [] Modify the design or operation of the cooling tower that will change water or air flow characteristics?
- 9. © Modify the design or operation of the plant that will change the path of an existing water discharge or that will result in a new water discharge?
10 . © Modify existing stationary fuel burning equipment (i .e ., diesel fuel oil, butane, gasoline, propane, and kerosene)?
11 . [ Involve the installation of stationary fuel burning equipment or use of portable fuel burning equipment (i .e ., diesel fuel oil, butane, gasoline, propane, and kerosene)?
12 . [ Involve the installation or use of equipment that will result in a new or additional air emission discharge?
- 13. Involve the installation or modification of a stationary or mobile tank?
14 . El Z Involve the use or storage of oils or chemicals that could be directly released into the environment?
15 . 0 Z Involve burial or placement of any solid wastes in the site area that may affect runoff, surface water, or groundwater?
LI-101-01, Rev. 5
58 .59 REVIEW FORM Page 75 of 83 C. SECURITY PLAN SCREENING If any of the following questions is answered "yes, a Security Plan Review must be performed by the Security Department to determine actual impact to the Plan and the need for a change to the Plan .
Could the proposed activity being evaluated:
Yes
- 1. 0 E Add, delete, modify, or otherwise affect Security department responsibilities (e .g ., including fire brigade, fire watch, and confined space rescue operations)?
- 2. [ Result in a breach to any security barrier(s) (e .g ., HVAC ductwork, fences, doors, walls, ceilings, floors, penetrations, and ballistic barriers)?
- 3. [ Cause materials or equipment to be placed or installed within the Security Isolation Zone?
F] z Affect (block, move, or alter) security lighting by adding or deleting lights, structures, buildings, or temporary facilities?
- 5. [] Modify or otherwise affect the intrusion detection systems (e .g ., E-fields, microwave, fiber optics)?
- 6. Modify or otherwise affect the operation or field of view of the security cameras?
- 7. Modify or otherwise affect (block, move, or alter) installed access control equipment, intrusion detection equipment, or other security equipment?
- 8. Modify or otherwise affect primary or secondary power supplies to access control equipment, intrusion detection equipment, other security equipment, or to the Central Alarm Station or the Secondary Alarm Station?
- 9. CI Modify or otherwise affect the facility's security-related signage or land vehicle barriers, including access roadways?
10 . El 0 Modify or otherwise affect the facility's telephone or security radio systems?
Documentation for accepting any "yes" statement for these reviews will be attached to this 50 .59 Review or referenced below.
LI-101-01, Rev. 5
Page 7 6 of 83 D. INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION (ISFSI) SCREENING If any of the following questions is answered "yes, an ISFSI Review must be performed in accordance with NMM Procedure LI-112, "72.48 Review," and attached to this Review .
Will the proposed Change being evaluated :
Yes No
- 1. 7 E Any activity that directly impacts spent fuel cask storage or loading operations?
- 2. Involve the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) including the concrete pad, security fence, and lighting?
El 0 Involve a change to the on-site transport equipment or path from the Fuel Building to the ISFSI?
- 4. Involve a change to the design or operation of the Fuel Building fuel bridge including setpoints and limit switches?
- 5. E] E Involve a change to the Fuel Building or Control Room(s) radiation monitoring?
- 6. El Z( Involve a change to the Fuel Building pools including pool levels, cask pool gates, cooling water sources, and water chemistry?
Involve a change to the Fuel Building handling equipment (e.g., bridges and cask cranes, structures, load paths, lighting, auxiliary services, etc)?
- 8. E] Z Involve a change to the Fuel Building electrical power?
- 9. F~ Z involve a change to the Fuel Building ventilation?
1©. [] Involve a change to the ISFSI security?
11 . 0 Z Involve a change to off-site radiological release projections from non-ISFSI sources?
- 12. R Involve a change to spent fuel characteristics?
13 . Redefine/change heavy load pathways?
14 . Q Fire and explosion protection near or in the on-site transport paths or near the ISFSI?
- 15. F} Z Involve a change to the loading bay or supporting components?
16 . New structures near the ISFSI?
- 17. Q is Modifications to any plant systems that support dry fuel storage activities?
- 18. [ Involve a change to the nitrogen supply, service air, demineralized water or borated water system in the Fuel Building?
LI-101-01, Rev . 5
50.59 REVIEW FORM Page 77 of 83
.59 EVALUATION License Amendment Determina Does the proposed Change being evaluated represent a change to a method of evaluation F-1 Yes ONLY? If "Yes, Questions 1 - 7 are not applicable; answer only Question 8. If "No," answer No all questions below .
Does the proposed Change :
- 1. Result in more than a minimal increase in the frequency of occurrence of an accident Yes previously evaluated in the FSAR? No BASIS :
RegardincL FSAR Section 15.1 .3 Steam System Pipinq Failures Post-Trip Return-to-Power:
The accident previously evaluated in the FSAR is discussed in Section 15.1 .3.1, Steam System Piping Failures Post-Trip Return-to-Power, which is classified as a limiting fault. This accident was re-evaluated for EPU in calculation CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 .
The objective of the main steam line break (MSLB) with or without a concurrent LOOP event re-analysis for EPU was to document the impact of :
a An increase in rated power to 3716 MWt c A decrease in the LSGP trip and MSIS actuation setpoints o A reduction in CEA worth at trip a Transition to the CENTS transient simulation code c Change in most negative MTC from -4 .0x10 _4 Ap/'F to -4 .2x1fl _' Ap/ F This revised analysis has been submitted to the NRC for review and acceptance via revised EPU PUR section 2.13.1 .3.1, included in Attachment 1 to Entergy Letter W3F1-20104-0096 which is supplemental to the EPU LAR NPF-38-249 . FSAR Section 15.1 .3.1 has been revised to reflect the re-analysis and is in agreement with the EPU LAR .
The LAR and its supplements (refer to ER-W3-2001-1149-015, Section 2.2.6 for a list of letters containing the LAR and supplements) were issued requesting NRC approval for implementation of EPU at the Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station . This submittal encompasses the analyses completed, and methodology utilized in support of the EPU evaluations . In accordance with Section II .A.5 of this 50.59 Review, the validity of this review is dependent on NRC approval of the EPU LAR and is also dependent on a review of the EPU LAR SER (when issued by the NRC) to ensure that the ER and this 50.59 review remain in agreement with the approved SER.
Stating the acceptance criteria in a revised manner (i .e., 24 kw/ft vs . 21 kw/ft) will not impact the frequency of occurrence of the accident . There are no new demands on plant equipment which impact frequency associated with the revised analysis . Additionally, all aspects of the re-analysis of this event, except for the use of 24 w/ft, is being reviewed by the NRC in the EPU LAR, therefore, evaluation of this event is not required under 50.59 to determine if the changes result in more than a minimal increase in the frequency of occurrence of an accident previously evaluated in the FSAR .
- 2. Result in more than a minimal increase in the likelihood of occurrence of a malfunction of a LJ Yes structure, system, or component important to safety previously evaluated in the FSAR? [I No BASIS:
Regarding FSAR Section 15 .1 .3 .9 Steam S stem Pi in Failures Post- Trip Return-to-Power:
The malfunction previously evaluated in the FSAR is discussed in Section 15.1 .3.1, Steam System Piping Failures Post-Trip Return-to-Power . This accident was re-evaluated for EPU in calculation CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 _ The malfunction which initiates this accident is a main steam line pipe break ; no specific initiator for the break is given in the original or revised analysis . Other malfunctions of equipment occurring after the initiation of the accident are also discussed in FSAR Section 15.1 .3.1 .
LI-101-01, Rev. 5
50 .59 REVIEW FORM Page 78 of 83 See response to Question 1 above for the objective of the re-analysis of this event for EPU .
See response to Question 1 above regarding the relationship and validity of this evaluation to the EPU LAR.
This revised analysis has been submitted to the NRC for review and acceptance via revised PUR section 2.13.1 .3 .1, included in Attachment 1 to Entergy Letter W3F1-2004-(3096 which is supplemental to the EPU LAR NPF-38-249 . FSAR Section 15 .1 .3 .1 has been revised to reflect the re-analysis and is in agreement with the EPU LAR .
Stating the acceptance criteria in a revised manner (i,e ., 24 kwift vs . 21 kwwlft) will not impact the likelihood of occurrence of malfunctions . There are no new demands on plant equipment which impact likelihood associated with the revised analysis . Additionally, ail aspects of the re-analysis of this event, except for the use of 24 kwift, is being reviewed by the NRC in the EPU LAR, therefore, evaluation of this event is not required under 5¬}.59 to determine if the changes result in more than a minimal increase in the likelihood of occurrence of a malfunction of a structure, system, or component important to safety previously evaluated in the FSAR .
- 3. Result in more than a minimal increase in the consequences of an accident previously D Yes evaluated in the FSAR? No BASIS :
Regarding FSAR Section 15 .1 .3 .1, Steam System Piping Failures Post-Trip Return-to-Power :
The accident with radiological consequences previously evaluated in the FSAR is evaluated in Section 15 .1 .3 .1, Steam System Piping Failures Post-Trip Return-to-Power. This accident was re-evaluated for EPU in calculation CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 . The radiological consequences of this accident was originally evaluated in FSAR Section 15 .1 .3 .1 .5 .
See response to Question 1 above for the objective of the re-analysis of this event for EPU .
See response to Question 1 above regarding the relationship and validity of this evaluation to the EPU LAR .
This revised analysis has been submitted to the NRC for review and acceptance via revised PUR section 2 .13,1 .3 .1, included in Attachment 1 to W3F1-2004-0096 which is supplemental to the EPU LAR NPF 249 . FSAR Section 15 .1 .3 .1 has been revised to reflect the re-analysis and is in agreement with the EPU LAR. The evaluation of radiological consequences of this accident is contained in revised FSAR section 15 .1 .3 .3 .5 . Radiologica l consequences of this accident are not within the scope of this ER, they are evaluated by ER-W3-2004-0276-000, Implementation of Alternate Source Term (AST) which also includes EPU related impact to dose consequences . However, the dose consequence evaluation for MSLB is based on a 2% fuel melt fuel failure, which is either equal to (for TID-14844 source terms) or conservative (for alternate source terms) with respect to an assumed 10% fuel failure due to DNBR (ECS04-004).
Stating the acceptance criteria for evaluating fuel melt in a revised manner (i .e ., 24 kwift vs . 21 kwift) has not impacted the fuel failure limits for EPU, as described in the PUR and its supplements. Thus, since the amount of fuel failure permitted has not changed, there is no increase in the consequences of the event.
Additionally, all aspects of the re-analysis of this event, except for the use of 24 kwift, is being reviewed by the NRC in the EPU LAR, therefore, evaluation of this event is not required under 50 .59 to determine if the changes result in more than a minimal increase in the consequences of an accident previously evaluated in the FSAR .
- 4. Result in more than a minimal increase in the consequences of a malfunction of a structure, 11- 1 Yes system, or component important to safety previously evaluated in the FSAR? E3 No BASIS:
Regardinm FSA R Secti.orn 1 5,1,3 .1 _Steam .System Pi in Failures Post-Trip Return-to-Power:
The malfunction with radiological consequences previously evaluated in the FSAR is evaluated in Section 15 .1 .3 .1, Steam System Piping Failures Post-Trip Return-to-Power . This accident was re-evaluated for EPU in calculation CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 . The radiological consequences of this malfunction was originally evaluated in FSAR Section 15 .1 .3 .1 .5 . The malfunction which initiates this accident is a main steam line pipe break. Other malfunctions of equipment occurring after the initiation of the accident are also discussed in FSAR Section 15 .1 .3 .1 .
LI-101-01, Rev. 5
ge 79 of 83 See response to Question 1 above for the objective of the re-analysis of this event for EPU.
See response to Question 1 above regarding the relationship and validity of this evaluation to the EPU LAR.
This revised analysis has been submitted to the NRC for review and acceptance via revised PUR section 2,13 .1 .3 .1, included in Attachment 1 to W3F1-2004-0096 which is supplemental to the EPU LAR NPF 249 . FSAR Section 15 .1 .3 .1 has been revised to reflect the re-analysis and is in agreement with the EPU LAR . The evaluation of radiological consequences of this accident is contained in revised FSAR section 15 .1 .3 .3 .5 . Radiological consequences of this accident are not within the scope of this ER, they are evaluated by ER-W3-2004-0276-000, Implementation of Alternate Source Term (AST) which also includes EPU related impact to dose consequences . However, the dose consequence evaluation for MSLB is based on a 2% fuel melt fuef failure, which is either equal to or conservative with respect to an assumed 10% fuel failure due to DNBR (ECS04-004) Stating the acceptance criteria for evaluating fuel melt in a revised manner (i .e ., 24 kw,!ft vs . 21 kwlft) has not impacted the fuel failure limits for EPU, as described in the PUR and its supplements. Thus, since the amount of fuel failure permitted has not changed, there is no increase in the consequences of the event.
Additionally, all aspects of the re-analysis of this event, except for the use of 24 kwlft, is being reviewed by the NRC in the EPU LAR, therefore, evaluation of this event is not required under 50,59 to determine if the changes result in more than a minimal increase in the consequences of a malfunction of a structure, system, or component important to safety previously evaluated in the FSAR .
- 5. Create a possibility for an accident of a different type than any previously evaluated in the [] Yes FSAR? No BASIS:
Regardinq SAR Section 15 .13.1, Steam System Piping Failures Post-Trip Return-to-Power :
This evaluation is restricted to the re-analysis, for EPU, of an accident previously evaluated in the FSAR, i.e ., Section 15 .1 .3 .1, Steam System Piping Failures Post-Trip Return-to-Power, which is classified as a limiting fault. This accident was re-evaluated for EPU in calculation CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 . The reanalysis did not create a different type of accident .
See response to Question 1 above for the objective of the re-analysis of this event for EPU .
See response to Question 1 above regarding the relationship and validity of this evaluation to the EPU LAR.
This revised analysis has been submitted to the NRC for review and acceptance via revised PUR section 2.13.1 .3 .1, included in Attachment 1 to Entergy Letter W3F1-2004-0096 which is supplemental to the EPU LAIR NPF-38-249 . FSAR Section 15,1 .3 .1 has been revised to reflect the re-analysis and is in agreement with the EPU LAR.
All aspects of the re-analysis of this event, except for the use of 24 kwfft, is being reviewed by the NRC in the EPU LAR, therefore, evaluation of this event is not required under 50 .59 to determine if the changes create a possibility for an accident of a different type than any previously evaluated in the FSAR .
- 6. Create a possibility for a malfunction of a structure, system, or component important to safety 0 Yes with a different result than any previously evaluated in the FSAR? No BASIS:
Redarc in q FSAR... Sectio n 15 .1 .3. .:1 . Steam Syste m Piping Fail ures Post-Trip .. Return-to-Power:
This evaluation is restricted to the re-analysis . for EPU, of an accident, caused by a malfunction (steam line pipe break), previously evaluated in the FSAR, i .e ., Section 15 .1 .3 .1, Steam System Piping Failures Post-Trip Return-to-Power, which is classified as a limiting fault. This accident was re-evaluated for EPU in calculation Chi-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 . The reanalysis did not create a malfunction with a different result, i .e ., the malfunction (steam line pipe break) still results in a Limiting Fault "Increase in Heat Removal by the Secondary System (Turbine Plant) type accident defined in FSAR Section 15 .1 .3 .1 .
See response to Question 1 above for the objective of the re-analysis of this event for EPU, See response to Question 1 above regarding the relationship and validity of this evaluation to the EPU LAR.
This revised analysis has been submitted to the NRC for review and acceptance via revised PUR section LI-101-01, Rev. 5
Page 80 of 83 2,13 .1 .3 .1, included in Attachment 1 to Entergy Letter W3171 -2004-0096 which is supplemental to the EPU LAR NPF-38-249 . FSAR Section 15 .1 .3 .1 has been revised to reflect the re-analysis and is in agreement with the EPU LAR .
All aspects of the re-analysis of this event, except for the use of 24 kwift, is being reviewed by the NRC in the EPU LAR, therefore, evaluation of this event is not required under 50 .59 to determine if the changes create a possibility for a malfunction of a structure, system, or component important to safety with a different result than any previously evaluated in the FSAR .
- 7. Result in a design basis fimit for a fission product barrier as described in the FSAR being 1~ Yes exceeded or altered? No BASIS:
Reoardinq_FSAR Section 15 .1 .3 .1 . .Steam System Pipinq Failures Post-Trip Return-to-Power:
Evaluation of the Fuel Melt Criteria used for Return to Power Steam Line Break with No Loss of Offsite Power Discussion of Transient The Return to Power Steam Line Break (RTP SLB) with No Loss of Offsite Power (LOOP) postulates a rupture in one of the main steam lines between the steam generators (SGs) and the turbine. In the presence of a negative MTC, the reductions in RCS temperature add positive reactivity to the core reducing the amount by which the core is subcritical .
Core power can increase due to the return to criticality and, due to the very high local peaking, the local power can approach the fuel melt fuel safety limit even though core average power is only a few percent of rated.
History of the Fuel.. ..Melt Safety . .Limit As originally written, the Waterford-3 Technical Specification contained the following fuel safety limit, Peak Linear Heat Rate 2.1 .1 .2 The peak linear heat rate (adjusted for fuel rod dynamics) of the fuel shall be maintained less than or equal to 29 .0 kwfft.
The Technical Specification quotes the calculated steady state linear heat rate that corresponds to center line melt (21 kwlft), but also contains provision for adjustment for fuel rod dynamics .
The RTP SLB with no LOOP had always demonstrated that the steady state safety limit on linear heat rate was not exceeded . For previous analyses, this entailed demonstrating that the peak linear heat rate remained below 21 kwlft. Hence there was no need to adjust for fuel rod dynamics .
The Subcritical and HZP CEA withdrawal events have typically resulted in linear heat rates in the neighborhood of 30 kwlft. While this is nominally above the steady state limit on linear heat rate, the brief period of time in which these events were producing sensible core heat, meant that the increase in fuel temperatures remained well below the temperatures at which fuel melting would occur.
Acceptability of the results of these events has been done by performing an adiabatic energy deposition evaluation . So while these events reported high LHR, the fuel temperatures have been validated to remain acceptable when fuel rod dynamics were considered . The Waterford-3 FSAR has long documented this alternative method of demonstrating fuel integrity .
In 2002, during the review of the Waterford 3 Appendix K margin recovery power uprate request, the NRC noticed that the results for the two CEA withdrawal scenarios exceeded the steady state limit as specified in the plant technical specifications . The NRC stated in the Safety Evaluation for Amendment 181, which addressed this issue, that :
"The two AOOs for which the PLHR Safety Limit is exceeded are the CEA Withdrawal events from Subcritical and Low Pourer conditions . These events and their acceptance criteria are discussed in Standard Review Plan (SRP) Section 95 .4 .1 . While the current Safety Limit of 21 kwfft is exceeded during two AO©s, the peak fuel centerline temperature does not exceed the melting point, which is the true acceptance criteria for this event. "
The actual safety limit was subsequently changed to more directly indicate that fuel melting was the criteria being protected against. Technical Specification 2.1 .1 .2 safety limit was revised from "Peak Linear I-101-01, Rev. 5
50 .59 REVIEW FORM Page 81 of 83 Heat Rate" to "Peak Centerline Fuel Temperature" and revised, per Amendment 181, to read, Peak Centerline Fuel Temperature 2.1 .1 .2 The peak fuel centerline temperature shall be maintained less that 5080 °F (decreasing by 58 °F per 113, 300 MWD/MTU for bumup and adjusting for burnable poisons per CENPf3-382-P-A)
The technical specification bases associated with the revised technical specification safety limit for Peak Centerline Fuel Temperature included the following, A steady state peak linear heat rate of 21 kwlft has been established as the Limiting Safety System Setting to prevent fuel centerline melting during normal steady state operation .
Following design basis anticipated operational occurrences, the transient linear heat rate may exceed 21 kwlft provided the fuel centerline melt temperature is not exceeded.
Thus the basis of the new technical specifications recognized transient results in excess of 21 kwlft, provided that additional analytical steps demonstrated that the fuel centerline melt safety limit was not exceeded .
As stated in the Safety Evaluation for Amendment 181 which changed the above safety limit, this safety limit is applicable for normal operation and anticipated operational occurrences (AOOs) . Additionally, it states that :
"The intent of the Peak Linear Heat Rate (PLHR) Safety Limit is to prevent the fuel centerline temperature from reaching the melting point, which conservatively assures that there will be no breach in cladding integrity.'.
Power Uprate .Anatysfs The RTP SLI3 with no LOOP performed for power uprate resulted in linear heat rates in excess of 21 kwlft.
The peak linear heat rate for the event was however demonstrated to be below 24 kw/ft (i .e ., 22 .8 kw/ t per Table 2.13.1 .3 .1-6 of the revised LAIR PUR per Attachment 1 of W3Fl-2004-0096) .
A study performed several years ago (8{367-PHR-139, Rev 00 "Return-to-Power Steam Line Break Analysis for Calvert Cliffs Unit 1 Cycle 8," May 23, 1985) demonstrated that for 14x14 fuel, at steam line break coolant conditions, fuel melting would not occur until linear heat rates were in excess of 24 kwift.
This study used STRIKIN 11 to perform a detailed fuel temperature calculation at these high linear heat rate
- steam line break conditions . A comparison between the coolant conditions in the 14x14 evaluation and the Waterford-3 power uprate conditions were included in calculation CN-TAS-02-97 . The comparison showed good agreement between the coolant conditions . Additionally, it was noted that the study was on 1414 fuel, larger diameter than Waterford-3 16x16 fuel . Thus, for a given linear heat rate, the Waterford-3 fuel would predict lower fuel temperatures .
It was therefore concluded in CN-TAS-02-97 that demonstrating that the maximum linear heat rate of 24 kw/ft was a still conservative method of demonstrating that fuel melt would not occur and that the results of the RTP SLB with no LOOP still demonstrate no fuel failure due violation of the fuel melt safety limit.
Thus, the requirements of Technical Specifications 2.1 .1 .2 are met.
Literature Search Section 7 .2 .1 .1 .1 .3 of the FSAR contains reference to 21 kwlft as the setpoint for the high local power density trip . At the time of the revised technical specification, it was decided not to pursue relief on this setpoint in the CPCs . The presence of this conservative lower trip setpoint does not invalidate the use of alternative calculations which justify a higher linear heat rate as the onset of fuel melt. Note that since the CPCs must protect against slowing changing power increases, the use o¬ a steady state limit for linear heat rate (such as 21 kwtft) is appropriate .
Section 7.2 .2 .1 .1 of the FSAR mentions that AOOs should not violate the 21 kw/ft fuel safety limit which corresponds to the onset of fuel melting . Its inclusion as an absolute limit in the current FSAR is in disagreement with the methodology described elsewhere in the current FSAR for CEA withdrawal (see next). This is being addressed in the Chapter 7 ER for EPU, ER-W3-2001-1149-007 .
Section 15 .4 .1 .1 .3 of the FSAR describes the current analytical method for CEA withdrawal in which this AOO violates the old 21 kw/ft safety limit on linear heat rate but demonstrates compliance with the underlying "no melt" criteria by an alternative calculation . The use of an alternative calculation to demonstrate that no melt would occur at an elevated linear heat rated is specifically anticipated by the Iri-101-01 . Rev. 5
bases to technical specification 2 .1 .1 .2 .
There are no Westinghouse topical reports to the NRC which specify methodology for application to Waterford-3 steam line break transients which specify the use of a 21 kw/ft linear heat rate limit for RTP SLB with No LOOP .
Conclusion :
The only issue to address in this 50 .69 evaluation is the use of 24 kw ft ; not that the new analysis results in adverse results. Entergy letter W3Fl-2004-0096 already addresses the issue concerning that the results of the analysis is more adverse than pre-EPU and gives the LHGR as 22 .8 kw/ft vs . the original value of 20 .7 kw,`ft . See revised PUR Section 2 .13 .1 .3,1 attached to letter W3Fl-2004-0096 where it states in section 2 .13.1 .3 .1 .6, Analysis Results, "It is seen that the response for the power uprate is slightly more adverse than the current power level . A limited extent of SAFDL violation is seen to occur for these inside containment steam line breaks ." Therefore, the NRC is reviewing that issue as part of the submittal.
The issue of fuel centerline melting point is related to a design basis limit for a fission product barrier as described in the FSAR, however, the issue of using the value of 24 kw/ft does not, in itself, result in the exceedance or alteration of this design basis limit. Westinghouse used 24 kw/ft for expediency only .
Westinghouse performed their analysis (CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1) and found that the LHGR was greater than 21 kw/ft (i .e ., 22 .8kwift) . They referred to a calculation they had already performed, 8067-PHR-139, Rev 00 "Return-to-Power Steam Line Break Analysis for Calvert Cliffs Unit 1 Cycle 8," May 23, 1985.
Calculation CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Section 4 .2 states :
Hand Calculation #6 of 8067-PHR-139, Rev 00 examines the threshold of fuel melting during SLB conditions . Several STRIKIN-II cases were created with conditions mirroring the core conditions (reduced coolant temperatures, etc) at the time of peak return to power for this Calvert Cliffs analysis . It is seen that the threshold of core melting occurred with local conditions consistent with a core power level of 10,700 MWt. As Calvert is a 2700 MWt plant and the average linear hear rate of a Calvert 14x14 assembly is -6 .5 KWIFt, the onset of melting is predicted to occur at a linear heat rate of (10,70012,700) 6 .5 = 26 .7 KW/Ft . Additionally, as the 16x16 fuel rods used at Waterford-3 is of smaller diameter, it will have lower fuel temperature for a given linear heat rate . Thus examination of the Reference 16 work supports the use of a 24 kW/ft as the LHGR limit before melt for SLB accident conditions herein . The use of this figure of merit is limited to the no-LOOP SLB cases .
As stated above, in the Calvert Cliffs` calculation they had back calculated what the LHGR would be if fuel centerline melt were to occur; it was on the order of 26 kw/ft. So they said that 24 is less than 26 and 22 .8 is less than 24 and therefore fuel centerline melt would not occur. This comparison of results was to preclude performing the calculation to actually determine what the centerline temperature would be, i.e ., it was essentially a short cut .
As state earlier, in the NRC's Safety Evaluation for Amendment 181 for changing Technical Specification 2 .1 .1 .2 the NRC acknowledges that "While the current Safety Limit of 21 kwlft is exceeded during two AOQs, the peak fuel centerline temperature does not exceed the melting point, which is the true acre tance criteria for this event." Therefore, the true acceptance criteria is fuel centerline temperature does not exceed the melting point.
Therefore, 24 kw/ft is not a new acceptance criteria for WF3 its use was only a expedient method of comparing results from two analysis and determining the there is no fuel centerline melt and is only used for this event. The results of the analysis for this event following EPU. continues to show that the requirements of Technical Specifications 2.1 .1 .2 are met.
Therefore, the use of 24 kw/ft is not a change to or result in exceeding a design basis limit for a fission product barrier as described in the FSAR but just the method used for documenting the acceptance criteria (fuel centerline melt temperature not exceeded) was met for the SLB RTP event.
As stated above, the accident response for power uprate is slightly more adverse than the current power level . A limited extent of SAFIOL violation is seen to occur for the inside containment steam line breaks .
This is discussed in revised PUR section 2 .13 .1 .3 .1, revised per Attachment 1 to W3Fl-2004-0036 which is supplemental to the EPU LAR NPF-38-249 . FSAR Section 15 .1 .3 .1 has been revised to reflect the re-analysis and is in agreement with the EPU LAR.
See response to Question 1 above regarding the relationship and validity of this evaluation to the EPU LI-101-01, Rev . 5
Page 83 of 83 LAR .
The overall re-analysis of this event and the resulting adverse response is being reviewed by the NRC in the EPU LAR, therefore, evaluation of this event is not required under 50.59 to determine if the changes result in a design basis limit for a fission product barrier as described in the FSAR being exceeded or altered and the use of 24 kwlft is not a new acceptance criteria for WF3 its use was only a expedient method of comparing results from two analysis and determining that there is no fuel centerline melt .
- 8. Result in a departure from a method of evaluation described in the FSAR used in establishing Yes the design bases or in the safety analyses? No BASIS:
Regarding FSAR Section 15 .1 .3.1 Steam S stern Pi in Failures Post-Trip . Return-to-Power :
The method of evaluation previously evaluated in the FSAR is discussed in Section 15.1 .3.1, Steam System Piping Failures Post-Trip Return-to-Power. This accident was re-evaluated for EPU in calculation CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 .
This revised analysis has been submitted to the NRC for review and acceptance via revised PUR section 2.13 .1 .3.1, included in Attachment 1 to Entergy Letter W3F1-2004-0096 which is supplemental to the EPU LAR NPF-38-249 . FSAR Section 15 .1 .3.1 has been revised to reflect the re-analysis and is in agreement with the EPU LAR, Revised PUR Section 2.13 .1 .3.1 .4, Analysis Overview, states that: "The methodology used in this analysis is the same as that used in the analysis of record." It also states that the objective of the main steam line break (MSLB) with or without a concurrent LOOP event re-analysis for EPU was to document the impact of :
o An increase in rated power to 3716 MWt o A decrease in the LSGP trip and MSIS actuation setpoints o A reduction in CEA worth at trip o Transition to the CENTS transient simulation code
_,p/°F to-4
.2x10 -4 Apf°F c Change inmost negative MTC from -4 .0x10_4 The acceptability of using of the CENTS code is part of the EPU LAR submittal . The LAR is currently awaiting NRC approval . See response to Question 1 above regarding the relationship and validity of this evaluation to the EPU LAR.
The re-analysis of this event is being reviewed by the NRC in the EPU LAR, therefore, evaluation of this event is not required under 50.59 to determine if the changes result in a departure from a method of evaluation described in the FSAR used in establishing the design bases or in the safety analyses .
If any of the above questions is checked "YES", obtain NRC approval prior to implementing the change by initiating a change to the Operating License in accordance with NMM Procedure ENS-LI-113 .
u-101-a1, Rev . 5