ML061280082
| ML061280082 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 01/06/2005 |
| From: | Chenault W Entergy Nuclear South |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| ER-W3-2001-1149-015 | |
| Download: ML061280082 (8) | |
Text
Page 1 of 83 Preparer :
W.H. Chenauit Name (print)
Reviewer :
OSRC :
LI-101-01, Rev. 5
- 1.
OVERVIEW t SIGNATURES Facility :
Waterford 3 SES Document Reviewed :
ER-W3-2001-1149-015 Description :
IPU Impact on FSAR Chapter 15 System Designators)/Description :
N/A Description of Proposed Change :
ER-0113,2001-1149-015 is an Interdiscipline ER that provides the evaluation of the proposed Extended Power Uprate (EPU) to determine if there are any impacts on FSAR Chapter 15 that result from the implementation of EPU. This ER is input to ER-W3-2001-1149-000, the Nuclear Change ER that provides the justification for the acceptability of the implementation of EPU at Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station.
ER-W3-2001-1149-015 revises FSAR Chapter 15 to address EPU-related impacts via DRN 03-2067 ; these changes are listed and reviewed in Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3 of this 50.59 review.
Calculations were completed in support of the evaluation of the analyses and evaluations discussed in Chapter 15 of the FSAR. Each of these calculations and analyses is summarized in ER-W3-2001-1149-015 with regards to the purpose of the calculation and the conclusions reached in the calculation. No hardware changes are required as a result of these calculations and analyses done in support of the FSAR Chapter 15 evaluations.
A number of the proposed FSAR changes are identified as typographical/editorial and do not affect the plant design bases or any plant functions or operations as identified in FSAR Chapter 15.
These changes only correct typographical errors or they are editorial in nature. See Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3 for details_
Several changes are considered to be "FSAR-only" changes in accordance with procedure LI-113 and do not require further evaluation. These changes are listed in Table 1 along with the specific justification from Li-113 which allows the change without further evaluation.
One change requires a 50.59 evaluation because it was not explicitly discussed in the EPU license amendment request (LAR) Power Uprate Report (PUR) or its supplements.
This is related to FSAR Section 15.1.3.1, concerning the use of a Peak Linear Heat Rate of 24 kwift criteria for determining if fuel melt will occur. See Section IV of this 50.59 Review for this evaulation, The balance of the FSAR changes are related to the changes discussed in the PUR portion of the LAR for the EPU; these changes are listed in Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3 of this 50.59 review. The acceptability of these changes are dependent on the NRC's approval of the pending Waterford 3 EPU LAR.
Check the applicable review(s) : (Only the sections indicated must be included in the Review.)
Ralph Sch-wartzbeck "ITZ, Name (print)
! U Sign l
ercon I
{
"106_1_05 Company
/ Department i
-bateT ~
Enercon
/
DE l
1/08105 I
Company
/ Department f Date ChangelRev.:
Chairman's Name (print)
/
Signature° - l Date
[Required only for Programmatic Exdusloil Screenings (see Section 5.8) and 50.59 Evaluations."
EDITORIAL CHANGE of a Licensing Basis Document I Section I SCREENING Sections I and 11 required I © 50.59 EVALUATION EXEMPTION f
i Sections 1, 11, and III required 50.59 EVALUATION (#:
05-001
)
I Sections 1, 11, and IV required
Page 2 of 83 II.
SCREENINGS A.
Licensingi Basis Document Review 1.
Does the proposed activity impact the facility or a procedure as described in any of the following Licensing Basis Documents?
f-operating License i TS NRC Orders If "YES", obtain NRC approval prior to implementing the change by initiating an LBD change in accordance with NMM LI-'[ 13. (See Section 5.2[131 for exceptions.)
LBDs controlled under 50.59 Technical Requirements Manua l Core Operating. Limits Report NRC Safety Evaluation Report and supplements for the initial FSAR' NRC Safety Evaluations for amendments to the Operating License If "YES", perform an Exemption Review per Section III OR perform a 50.59 Evaluation per Section IV OR obtain NRC approval prior to implementing the change. If obtaining NRC approval, document the LBD change in Section ILA.5 ; no further 50.59 review is required. However, the change cannot be impleme nted until approved by the NRC. AND initiate an L.BD change in accordance with NMMTL1-113. ~
~-
LBDs controlled under other regulations Quality Assurance Program Manual Fire Protection Program
[ (includes the Fire Hazards Analysis)
Offsite Dose Calculations Manual"' `
If "YES", evaluate any changes in accordance with the appropriate regulation AND initiate an LBO change in accordance with NMM LI-113. No further 50.59 review is required.
' if "YES," see Section 5.2[5]. No Lt3D change is required.
If'YES," notify the responsible department and ensure a 50.54 Evaluation is performed. Attach the 59.54 Review
' Changes to the Emergency Plan, Fire Protection Program, and Offsite Dose Calculation Manual must be approved by the OSRC in accordance with NMM OM-1 19 If "YES," evaluate the change in accordance with the requirements of the facility's Operating License Condition or under 501.59, as appropriate, i.1-101-01, Rev. 5 Operating License YES NO CHANGE # (if applicable) and/or SECTIONS IMPACTED
~
D ER-W3-2001-1149-015, DRN No
. 03-2 ¬/67 CHANGE # and/or SECTIONS IMPACTED O CHANGE # (if applicable) and/or SECTIONS IMPACTED
50.59 REVIEW FORM Page 3 of 83
- 2.
Does the proposed activity involve a test or experiment not described in the FSAR?
- 3.
Basis If "yes," perform a 50.59 Evaluation per Section IV OR obtain NRC approval prior to implementing the change AND initiate an LSD change in accordance with NMM LI-'113.
1f obtaining NRC approval, document the change in Section II.A.5 ; no further 50.59 review is required. However, the change cannot be implemented until approved by the NRC.
Explain why the proposed activity does ot does not impact the Operating Lice nse,Technical Specifications and/or the FSAR and why the proposed activity does or does not involve a new test or experiment not previously described in the FSAR. Discuss other LBDs it impacted. Adequate basis must be provided within the Screening such that a third-party reviewer can reach the same conclusions. Simply stating that the change does not affect TS or the FSAR is not an accep:abfe basis. See EOI 50.59 Guide¬fines Section 5.3.2 for guidance.
ER-W3-2001-1149-015 is an Interdiscipline ER with the scope of providing the evaluation of FSAR Chapter 15 and any required FSAR changes as a result of the proposed implementation of EPU. The ER documents evaluation of the Waterford 3 Extended Power Uprate (EPU) effects on the FSAR Chapter 15 analysis and associated licensing documentation.
Operation under EPU conditions may require plant SSCs to operate under different conditions, meet different performance criteria, or perform new or different functions. Evaluation of FSAR Chapter 15 is necessary to address the potential for EPU to affect plant's response to transients and postulated accidents. While the ER will identify the effects of EPU on these analyses, other ERs will evaluate the affected plant systems and implement any required changes to ensure readiness for operation under EPU.
Operating License:
Technical Specifications :
NRC Orders :
FSAR :
Technical Specification Bases:
Technical Requirements Manual :
Core Operating Limits Report :
L1-101-01, Rev. 5 E] Yes No The Waterford Unit 3 operating license is impacted by the Extended Power Uprate, however, the license amendment request for the extended power uprate (LAR NPF-38-249) addresses those applicable changes, and none of these changes are linked to the changes provided by this ER, Therefore, the proposed activity does not impact the Waterford Unit 3 operating license.
Waterford Unit 3 operating Technical Specifications are impacted by the Extended Power Uprate, however, the license amendment request for the extended power uprate (LAR NPF-38-249) addresses those applicable changes, and none of these changes are a direct result of the changes associated with the Chapter 15 ER..
Therefore, the proposed activity does not impact Waterford Unit 3 Technical Specifications.
Waterford Unit 3 has received NRC Orders pertaining to plant security and reactor vessel head inspections.
Due to the scope of this ER, this ER does not impact the NRC Orders and the NRC Orders do not impact the evaluations within the scope of this ER.
There are multiple FSAR changes implemented by this ER. See Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3 for details and review of these changes.
There are no specific Technical Specification Bases changes associated FSAR Chapter 15.
Technical Specification Bases changes associated with EPU are addressed in, and will be implemented by, ER-W3-2001-114=3-000, There are no specific TRM changes associated FSAR Chapter 15. TRM changes associated with EPU are addressed in, and will be implemented by, ER-W3-2001-1149-000, The COLR for reload will be processed under the Cycle 14 Reload ER. The activities associated with this ER do not impact the COLR since the ER itself makes no changes in the operation of the plant, does not
Quality Assurance Program Manual :
50.59 REVIEW FORM Page 4 of 83 impact the type of fuel used and does not change the limits defined in the COLR.
NRC Safety Evaluation Report and Supplements for the initial FSAR :
The NRC will review the EPU license amendment submittal and issue a Safety Evaluation Report (SER) for the changes within the scope of the amendment request. The changes within the scope of this ER are bounded by the license amendment request.
Changes not specifically addressed in the amendment request are considered editorial, changes that directly support the EPU request, or changes that indirectly support the EPU request. None of the changes within the scope of this ER were determined to invalidate the WF3 SER or supplements or require NRC approval prior to implementation.
NRC Safety Evaluations for amendments to the Operating License:
The NRC will review the EPU license amendment submittal and issue an SER for the changes within the scope of the amendment request. The changes within the scope of this ER are bounded by the license amendment request, Changes not specifically addressed in the amendment request are considered editorial, changes that directly support the EPU request, or changes that indirectly support the EPU request.
None of the changes within the scope of this ER were determined to invalidate the SERs for existing license amendments or require NRC approval prior to implementation.
This activity complies with all requirements of the Entergy Quality Assurance Program Manual ; as applicable. This activity does not change any commitments contained in the QAPM. Therefore, this activity does not require a change to the QAPM.
This activity does not impact the interaction of Waterford Unit 3 personnel and offsite agencies in response to an emergency and does not change any of Entergy's policies or commitments to nuclear accident responses. ER-W3-2001-1149-000 will address the overall impact on the Emergency Plan, if any, related to the implementation of EPU.
Fire Protection Program and Fire Hazards Analysis :
This ER is a paper change only, which does not authorize any changes to plant equipment or procedures.
Therefore, no changes to the Fire Protection Program or Fire Hazards Analysis are required.
Offsite Dose Calculations Manual :
The ODCM contains the methodology and parameters used in the calculation of offsite doses resulting from radioactive gaseous and liquid effluents, This activity does not impact radioactive gaseous or liquid effluents. Therefore, no changes to the ODCM is required.
Test or experiment not described in the FSAR :
This ER is a paper change only, which does not authorize any changes to plant equipment or procedures.
Therefore, this activity does not involve a test or experiment that is not described in the FSAR.
- 4.
References Discuss the methodology for performing LBD searches. State the location of relevant licensing document information and explain the scope of the review such as electronic search criteria used (e.9., key words) or the general extent of manual searches per Section 5.4.1[5](d) of LI-101
. NOTE : Ensure that manual searches are performed using controlled copies of the documents. If you have any questions, contact your site Licensing department.
LBDsfDocuments reviewed via keyword search :
Keywords :
For evaluation portion of this 50.59 Review, the LBDs in Section ll.A.1 were searched with the listed key words. For the remainder of the 50.59 review a manual search was done of Chapter 15 of the FSAR. Clue to the extensive changes made to Chapter 15, keyword searching was not feasible since nearly every section, table and figure was changed.
LBDs/Documents reviewed manually:
FSAR Chapter 15, 72 11.13, 7.2.2. 1.1 1-1-101-01, Rev. 5 kw:ft, fuel melt, linear heat rate
50.59 REVIEW FORM Page 5 of 83 5.
Is the validity of this Review dependent on any other change? (See Section 5.3.4 of the EOI Yes 10 CFR 50.59 Program Review Guidelines.)
F-1 No If "YES", list the required changes/submittals. The changes covered by this 50.59 Review cannot be implemented without approval of the other identified changes (e,g license amendment request).
Establish an appropriate notification mechanism to ensure this action is completed.
Validity of this review is also dependent on concurrent implementation of ER-W3-2001-1149-000. for which an action has been created in ERD. In addition, an action has been created in ERD for ER-W3-2001-1149-000 to review this ER against the EPU LAIR SER (when issued by the NRC) to ensure that the ER and this 50.59 review remain in agreement with the approved SER.
LAR NPF-38-249 and its supplements (refer to ER-W3-2001-1149-015, Section 2.2.6) were issued requesting NRC approval for implementation of EPU at the Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station. This submittal encompasses the analyses completed, and methodology utilized in support of the EPU evaluations.
The changes to the FSAR incorporate information relevant to the analyses that support implementation of the EPU at Waterford as discussed in LAR NPF-38-249 (and supplements). Therefore, for these changes no evaluation pursuant to 10CFR50.59 is required. See attached tables of changes (Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3), with cross-reference to the PUR submittal and/or supplements for a basis for each change.
Discussion of the changes in computer codes and methodologies used for Chapter 15 reanalysis for the EPU are contained in Entergy letter W3F1 -2003-0074 dated November 13, 2003 which contains the Waterford 3 EPU LAR. Attachment 6 of the letter contains Extended Power Uprate (EPU) report Appendix 1, "Safety Evaluation Report Compliance." This appendix contains the computer codes and methodologies used in ECCS performance analyses and for non-LOCA transient analyses and approved by an NRC issued SER. The Appendix 1 Introduction identifies the computer codes and methodologies that support the LOCA and non-LOCA transient analyses performed for the EPU. The tables and text of the Introduction identify the tables in Section 1 of the Appendix that contain the following information for each code and methodology:
" The NRC Safety Evaluation Report (SER) that documents regulatory approval
- The SER limitations and constraints
- Statements indicating how each constraint or limitation is met Therefore, changes in the methods of evaluation will be reviewed and approved by the NRC via the safety evaluation report (SER) for the WF3 EPU LAR
(-I-101-01, Rev. 5
LdGGt~ws
- §kEgEAFORm met A~ d~ FSaR S ~ ~
s
~
~ AR
. ~
~
Su pa ~
~
R ~ ~
_@}
kP~~
te
~
~ ~
ups Cmm~m_$~~
mn~
~.
~~~~.~~~ ~ ~
/@ ~ ~
p\\ M A b~
e ~
~
~
9~ v w
~c_
~
e#
~ mr~
~ mm_~(>
~
<<R
~ #te a lSJ~~
zgJ~~~~~~rn/¥~~~~L~R~FSO~kRvl ~\\m~s~&~\\~y&~9\\\\~R}~&~ ~~ Gm~~G+~re * ~m~~w A~
and<<rte #B~~ ~
ms
~ ~~ SJ<<2% ~v~
~
a~lry m~ ms _m <<ate %dm mmr ~ meEPU~ R and
~r mGm, 5% >>Swam<<
~Q~S~glK~v4 de~nA~ <<a~tyy *~m&m 4 s<<~Rp~h mgmaa~e e:SK~
gy m)
~
~ S NW e eke p _r?Ue(~ A
%b~ I6<< b mesm~~ g
+#w<<!m~
+/-!$ tzl4 mk~ #
EPU ~
R s~ i @)~ u_ e
~
R
~
~~ z Dag :
4
$G %~~
app v
}
~
~, z~$tt<<l E SuW~~ l<<tz%~ymmW E ~~
G~
~
~i z~$3?gg
~
~
w @e~ FB>> ~
h~ ~ n
++7,
~~lz~amlsl~
~s#~ ~r¢0o9,~a k&d% mdm Sw%
c E~ R~ &
~m7 ~r
~ dbbgi ~Cmmgm<<<<,
Lg Q,~
u6alAAmml~ ate, gJ~ &m mce46<<~ ~ t ~~
+/-2w r bmi~mequmm&
~ ~yG!
~
m can +~
yam~y k.
~
GaGe c~Gm a2~@m<<e~a r
~+d%r ~
my k m~
me
¢Sew a3~~e<<m~
R~ _a +/-~smv<<E m~Glpyobme#ma a7~ m~ s 9~~ em Sw l
% +m7de~mE lEtt~
z4zttl
~~ ~
am b Cm~ ya a3~vi Nomaq<< %F~ R~ 3m +/-w tt ~~ §yme
~mR
- Fkwt
. ~~m<<Uum
~+/-~G<<2<<~v~
~u6k &F~RSam Sexy
~
)s!\\\\~~>>!&tt2 ~~~\\nc <<~/
~~\\~~yqa\\~v
~~ Nomm<<se~\\R~~n~t~\\
~o~mgs~~~~~
'~~~%rte!>> CN2~$s%~vo
~ukG &~aRS~i SgJw LT+/-~ ym??~vl
~
tta ~..~\\~ m+%\\n~\\~~>>ow\\~v~~~~e~~<<m~~d<<\\mk \\\\n~.~~ ~Gtbm/~D~~3~*/a\\~v
+/-~ylJa
~ymmEaw
~ %~ ymg o,~ <<o s am D_ <<m!~
matey G w
&m am mmed~ ~h ~ U~ R ( ~ r ~ dm
~ m~ ~ mJS~,I d<<u_m %eW&d @~h %%!_eg ads#c ap me mama
- ksK~
~~ %~ wmglE ~
v4 Gmp&
imm+ebUk~_r m~Zrm~ls~mW a %e Su9~~ E~ ~R R
dee+~ m
~R k +ageb~h CEO Smde
~
amp}~ u~ a Gs%~!.
am_m}
AG~i game m<<WeN~ E~~ mr am E ~i 6.
a eau anm C~ _m y mR
FSAR Section 15.1.1.4 15.1.2.1 15.1.2.2 i2.13.1.2.1
. T LI-101-01, Rev. 5 Supporting E.P^U _~
PUR Section(s) 1 2_13.12.2 Event
'Decrease in Feedwattar
- Temperature with Single Active Faifure (SAF)
Increase.
. in.
Feedwater Flow with a SAF Supporting Calculation(s) f Docurnent(s)
Table 'l Affected FSAR Sections Remarks Credit for the CPCS Variable Overpower Trip A decrease in the low steam generator pressure (LSGP) trip and MSIS setpoints The impact of the above changes results in no violation to the DNB SAFDLs.
^ The objective _ of the inadvertent opening of an SG Atmospheric Dump Valve (IOSGADV) re-analysis was to document Ithe impact of:
The change in plant parameters due to the increase in rated power from 3441 MWt to 3716 MWt Using CENTS instead of CESEC as i
the NSSS simulation code The change in the most negative MTC from -4.0x10 -Q ApPF to -4.2 x10' 4 Ap1°F The decrease in the most negative MTC has the potential to add more positive reactivity during the cooldown.
The impact of the above changes results in no violation of the specified acceptable
- fuel design limits (SAFDL),
CN-TAS-03-18 Rev 1 1INo changes to FSAR Section 15.1.2.1 LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 The fuel performance (DNBR and LHR) characteristics and dose for this event are bounded by the anticipated operational occurrence (AOO) wfLOAC event. The AOO wiLOAC event is assumed to use up all reserved DNBR margin prior to the LOAC portion of the event. Bounded by
~
CN-TAS-03-18 Rev 1 LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 FSAR Section 15.1 2.3.
No changes to..FSAR Section 15.1.2.2 The fuel performance (DNBR and LHR) characteristics and dose for this event are bounded by the AOO w/LOAC event. The AOO w1LOAC event is assumed to use The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the sections andlor tables listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Sections) column of this table.
Changes T^.
o Changes
,,NlA 50.59 Review Form Section ILA.5 (Le.,
dependenton LAR approval) 2.13.1.1.4 -~V advertent~~..^_. CN-TAS-02-87 Rev 1 to Opening of a LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 W3F1-2003-0074 Steam Generator LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 (Table 8314.0-1)
!Atmospheric Dump Valve (ADV)
(IOSGADV)
LHS<<taws
.........~~~~_....~~.~~
~~~~~k/~~~.~~~~~...
~~ d~ FS~R S
~
_s FSAR~~~~~~\\~
~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~
Nkum<<c~~m¥~emm~~\\/g~~_
~
R5 ~ _(g
~
~eM Cam ~!_@}~
~ mama
~
~R
~ mp>
~~ma#g m w~ e~dDN~ ~ 6,#~~~~~.~~.~~~~~~~~ ~~
AC~dm <<memmt~ukk R
~ wR~ +/-m~£tzz 4\\12a~ ~
~~~~
~
+/-~ /~
\\~<<\\ak §~ ~/§/~ $s~ R v7
~
~ w+\\mk m~ ~
\\mf _ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
/&~ ohm<<s \\¢m om //_~
~~!%1a:2
~@mm~~~~h.CN4~Jym~vO
~oe~s<<awmd% <<mum ~h am maw R meERU~R ~q~4m
+/-4+/-t~~ S
~~~ ~ ~
Ge
~~ %~ mgg,K ~ wo ~©~ m <<
a+s#~ ~ & mem2m<<.R*>> %m
+/-!&tike
~~~r ~~0~ ~+/-~y<<a<<~,!
!<<m>>em~Pb~yQ~
aneb~!&n~dbme
~A<<kmlm
~ %~ mmw~%~v4 TW ua a CEO S~ he m& $e u+o q EPU PUR
.~ R %~ v
}
~amm~umny GaG~~\\
§O~Tm+ %~mUe$e~sWw web<<rw~ mme+m~ \\
m~ ~ ~ mr s~i _awls%
me me !_>>i m g +/-)HERq~
~ aM~ & W+/-<<ada~h m<<dam sm<<~ Ama <<~ &m.
ERU~R
~
E~e+agem~7~&?9
%haeea :_ m Gtr mmU% _;~ ame Gu~~l~R~ame A~~,<<~ mtm&m~ 6 m+~W~ma~~a
~
+/-elm dCN4~ Csa\\
6 me <<~ ~ ~
a r ash +am:md~h~ oe
~~ mR mm~ Q~h EPU :
~ %
~~
~
\\\\4
~,~ ~ ~ ~~
~ ~
/\\/~ ~
m
~
Cm~ ~
39~ u Tk ba&~ mt A/m~ \\\\~ ~
~
W +/-+<<s m mm~
\\~ W \\ ~
m~
\\\\_
0e
~~ ~T y<<a<<~v~
@0&D2 why Oe~sa~ i+db EPUL RadG<<c ~p me
~~ m~ Gm
~~~~5$¢9K~v4 ©>>~emeW92a
+amsm~Zrbb~ ~Qkmt~
- u
- SKe,
~ymaeb~R% yz+/-yam
~+~~ ~U~RSwm@)~+#W~ m Tk aea C~ ~ Ubrmm me
~ umn3 mG mil
~~ R +p v
}
c0~ T mdeb <<mom e~B ~
S +w m~ d _ m~
- ~hlam aPu m me l+/- HERNCE ~ k~U %@
~
~
<<mAa<<e<<~ #m.
~ftl~~.~~ \\~~
ymm~ %m~ \\~T~ \\3~ ~v Leo ~ \\\\dam ~ ~ t mm+
jm p/~~
R y m/~ k<<~ ~~~ mss 6~
A~i zl$t&, e@mFmer ~S~ymg<<~,~
hrkAs~)~+e~~2a
_mar ~~hERUUR~%~om~vw
~v k <<r§!!<<h ~ +~P~ %m ~ R~ y~g4m ~v4 m©ur 4~
0P me<< matey a~am mdme em&~h +3m,,fir ~ am
~b &7~Jm¢ b~~r amore $e+Aao m~Zt%~~&~mkhme
~nkSK~
mm}
~i m<<eaUkp~re~a S99mqEPUPUR
~de~d~ m ew s 3m&)~ umna m6 %by ~ RaP~ a&
&d<<mmea met GPmpaW y@S web&c~!_~ more 77~
maq<<~ R@~&
~r6mS~0q
Page 9 of 83 50.59 REVIEW FORM..~~
16A.3.2 LI-101-01, Rev. 5 Supporting EP PUR Section(g)_^t
..~-..--..._.
.vent.
Supporting Calculation(s) f Document(s)
Table 1 Affected FSAR Sections Remarks actuation setpoints A reduction in CEA worth at trip Transition to the CENTS transient simulation code Change in most negative MTC from -
-4
.0x30" rlpf'F to --4.2x1p-' Apl°F The response for the power uprate is slightly more adverse than the current power level. A limited extent of SAFDL violation is seen to occur for the inside containment steam line breaks. This is discussed in revised FUR section 2.13.1.3.1, revised per Attach 1 to W3F1-2004-0096.
No changes to FSAR Section 15.1.3.2...
The lower mode SLBs are not being reanalyzed. As the boiling point is unaffected by the power uprate or use of 3the CENTS code versus the CESEC code, the AOR far these events is judged ito remain bounding.
J he increase in rated thermal power has
' not altered the two important driving parameters in the subcritical SLB analysis. It has not altered the temperature dependent SHUTDOWN MARGIN figure (applicable for subcritical conditions) in the plant COLR. The reactivity balance performed in the reload analysis process for the lower mode SLB analysis assumes, due to the reduced initial primary system temperatures In the lower modes, that the minimum RCS
- temperatures reach 212°F. This assumption would still be bounding.
Nature of Changes Made to the ;
50.59 Review FSAR I
Category addressed in the EPU LAR.
b. One change on page 15.1-23 (change in time to 16.6 seconds) was not in the equivalent PUR Section or Table, however, this entry is supported by the listed calculation (CN-TAS-02-97) which is the basis for the rest of the section, and therefore implicitly covered by the EPU
- LAR, c. The use of a peak linear h( :,it rate of 24 kwlft criteria for determining if fuel melt will occur was not explicitly discussed in the LAR PUR or its supplements It is discussed in the Evaluation Section of this 50-59 Review Only editorial changes to this section (i.e., changes to Table and Figures numbers).
Evaluation Section IV applies.
ditorial 2
.13
.1
.3,2 d
and 4 All CN-TAS-03-18 Rev 1, Rods In (ARI)
Reference Attachment 1 to Steam Line Break Letter W3 F1-2004-0061 (SLB)
(RAI Q&R 15)
LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4
LQm<<t~ys
~.~.~..~~.~~~..~........~~/}~
A~deF~R~~n s BAR.-~~~~k§U-~
.-~~~m~
Nk<<e@chAA>>~~e&me~~09~vw Vim_
PUR~c_%%~
~eM Cam b!&Mgl
~maU
~~R
~m~~
~mmA~>
.. ~ ~. ~~~ ~... \\
~~
~
~ e ~ e~ /k~
~! ~ ~ ~ >>y~
~
~.. ~ ~
/
~~~ :.. ~. ~~..~~~
m~~db $eF~ Rmm m~ 4
~ ~. ~ ~. ~ ~ ~.. ~ ~ ~. ~
gEtll
+/- SJ:
a gmm~s m CN4~ $s23~v~
lea ei a me7~ +SLeaq~y% pedm~s~ mm~ &~h m.q~v <<
(~Gms RNq~br ~w~ y<<aa~vl
~Beam_4th +W4ame EPU~Rmd ;p~~&me
~~ ~Gm z~zt%&2&
P~ T+~~r ~ +/-~ y~ J :¢ ~v4 Gwa9 daq~
mGms>>~zrm~aaGlk m me u: 5K~
+/-aJwls
~mai
~e~<<r +mUk~ _r>> y~E su<<~ gEPU~R~dmb).~#+mlm
~ v k <<rA!!<<h u~
c umne m6 G~~
~~ Ra+_m>
8% wawam¢ U~gmecE~smd Uklmmth mm mds dm ~
c~ EC m~ a $eNSSS~ w~lm zlz tI$B
%a
~v k~ra!!<<h~
~
Cn mew _g mg#m N~ ~
m.
5 b wap <<m<<
¢ G~~ a~zF 0 4:
~~ 3p2F mm)
,G>>t,
/Jawt,
!~ @ y~@mm fN4~ 33+ ~v0 No+aq<< bFS R~ am +/-7t~
~ CGga
~mA
}NO~:Cy~ wgJe
~
u<<k G ~ a a ~
Weae v mum "w s<<A~ k % m6>> %0~ t~ %R Se i ~§zt&
l mm mew w J~ k
~ m!w m~ sammm
~h,meLOCC m ~
huh m~ &
f~
% m& met Cv ~
s
'mom m+/-l
~ %~ mq%% ~v,
~~~_~~~~&
~
~
45w~
~~
~~~
~
~
3u~
/T<<
CN4~ 3\\la~v!
N~ n qG >>~
ARC /mlsw~ ~e 9q/~ ~~ r am\\
~Edy~
~~ w~ y~ a¢ ~v~
T
% qem K m~
m kmr m>>~h
~aM~keaevmum~~
y~aRlswt\\.FmmaEm
~
p Ar a<<e{ONBR mdLH m dmd,m+ ae% mmemKaUm
~ ~ f~ $
ls\\:
a
~ /
_~
D: to
~~~ ~ _..~~
a \\~
~~
m~ y~ \\/~ \\4
~ /o
~
~
~
~
&\\ate me<<\\~ ~
}
\\#
~.
. ~.
.. ~~.
GagGam mm~ &~h
) +.m ~ v
- ~ km+r
,<<aG&mtmH
~s%d<<umeN~bima ash
~ U~ RaW m~ wm&me
~~ A~
Gm
'v mum( ~) yuppe_~ nn ~ #m elm ~+ Gm<<am~h ~
CC m3msa6~ %~~BIQk Ach ;a:
5(Q:
mmeWa mmka9
~lmmC~~~GrmmC~~ asup~igEPUPURSdm@) ;+9<<e&m s
,m am) beNS~ Qmu~lm~
~ umne GGm~~.
~~ R +~
aq
~Qr yma%~v,
~elymmewUk~~rm~+
~ R~ yo J!% ~
v4
~
Tkr~~ h$e~s%m#mum
Page 1 1 of 83 LI-101-01, Rev. 5 FSAR Section 15.2.2.1 revised to reflect FSAR Section 15.2.1.3 as the bounding event per PUR 2.13.2.1.3.
Loss of load with single failure (UFSAR Section 15.2_2.1) is no more adverse than the Toss of condenser vacuum event (UFSAR 15.2.1.3). Both of these events involve a sudden reduction in the removal of heat from the reactor coolant system.
The foss of condenser vacuum has the more severe initiator in that both steam flow and feedwater flow are terminated by the initiator. Additionally, as an infrequent event is pointing at the more restrictive moderate frequency event, the application of the potentially more restrictive acceptance criteria to the less Table t Affected FSAR Sections Remarks The fuel performance (DNBR and LHR).
..m..
consequences of this event are no more adverse than the total loss of forced reactor coolant flow event (UFSAR 15.3.2.1), an infrequent event. The peak pressure consequences of this event are no more adverse than the loss of
'condenser vacuum event, a moderate frequency even t (UFSAR 15.2.1.3).
No changes to FSAR Section 15.2.1.5 The failure of the steam pressure regulator would result in closing the turbine throttle valves. This transient is no more adverse than a loss of condenser vacuum (UFSAR Section 15.2.1.3), where the maximum rate of throttle valve closure is assumed.
frequent event would be conservative.
FSAR Section 15.2.2.2 revised to reflect FSAR Section 15.2.1.3 as the bounding event per PUR 2.13.2.1.3.
This event is no more adverse than the i Loss of Condenser Vacuum Event (FSAR Nature of Changes Made to the FSAR No Changes The changes are covered by. the.
EPU LAR and specifically the sections and/or tables fisted in the Supporting EPU PUR Section(s) column of this table.
The changes are covered by the 50.59 Review EPU LAR and specifically the sections and/or tables listed to the Supporting EPU FUR Sections) column of this table.
54.58 Review Category Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval)
/A 50.59 Review Form Section ILA.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval)
The changes are covered by the 50.59 Review EPU LAR and specifically the Form Section sections and/or tables listed in the II.A.5 (i.e.,
Supporting EPU PUR Section(s) dependent on column of this table.
LAR approval)
FSAR Section 15.2.1.4 Supporting EPU PUR Section(s) '
Event 2.13.2.1.4m
..~.__.___.
v LOOP (Section 2.13.2.1.4~
Revised per Attach 5 to W3F1-2004-0096)
_. Supporting Calculation(s)1 Uocurne nt(s)
CN-TAS-03-18 Rev m1 LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 152.1.5 2.132.1.5 Steam Pressure CN-TAS-03-18 Rev 1--
Regulator Failure LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 15.2.2.1 2.13.2.2.1 Loss of External CN-TAS-02-76 Rev 0 1 Load with SAF (NOTE ; CN-TAS-02-76 was performed to confirm that the Loss of Load Event was less limiting than the LOCV.
Consistent with the current FSAR, only the LOCV is being reported.)
CN-TAS-03-18 Rev 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 15.2.22 2.13_2_22 Turbine Trip. with CN-TAS-03-18 Rev 1 SAF LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4
1-1-101-01, Rev, 5 Table 1 Affected FSAR Sections Supporting I Pt3 Supporting
......._...._..._~._-___..
..__.__.._.~_.__.__.____.
FSAR pUR Section(s) '
went Calculation(s) !
Remarks Nature of Changes Made to the 50.59 Review Section Document(s)
FSAR Category
__~_
f
~_.~_...
-75.2.2.3).
From a fuel performance..........
._~.._...._. _.__._._..._..____._.._
~....___
(DNBR and LHR) standpoint, each event represents a total loss of load with a four pump flow coastdown.
15_2.2.3 2.1 3.2.2 3 LOCV with CN-TAS-02-53 Rev 1 Discussion in FSAR Section 15.2.2.3 was The changes are covered by the 50.59 Review Concurrent Single LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 deleted since it was bounded by FSAR EPU LAR and specifically the Farm Section Failure Section 15.2.1.3, Loss of Condenser sections and/or tables listed in the ILA,5 (i.e.,
Vacuum with no SAF.
I Supporting EPU PUR Section(s) i dependent on column of this table.
` LAR approval)
^.
15.2.2.4 2.13.22.4
- Lass-of-Normal CN-TAS-03-18 Rev 1 FSAR Section 15.2.2.4 was revised to The changes are covered by the 50.59 Review AC Power with LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 state that the consequences are bounded) EPU LAR and specifically the Form Section SAF LTR-TAS-Q4-119, Rev 4 by Section 15.3.2.1.
sections and/or tables listed in the i ILA.5 (i.e.,
Any credible single failure of an active Supporting EPU PUR Sections) dependent on component concurrent with a loss of all column of this table.
! LAR approval) normal AC power produces consequences less severe than those I
following a single reactor coolant pump i
shaft seizure(UFSAR 15-3,31),
15.2.2_5
_ _.___m.
2"1.3.2.2.5 loss-of-Normal ~[CN-TAS-03-3 Rev 1 The objective of the Toss-of-normalThe _
changes V _
are covered by the 50,59 Review Feedwater Flow (LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 feedwater flow analysis was to document EPU LAR and specifically the Form Section I
LTR-TAS-04-1 19, Rev 4 the impact of the following changes :
sections and/or tables fisted in the II.A.5 (i.e_
An increase in rated power Supporting E.PU PUR Section(s) dependent on A change to the CENTS code column of this table.
LAR approval)
Reduction in steam generator pressure A reduction in CEA worth at trip The impact of the power uprate results in no violation of SG heat removal capability j
for this Safety Analysis Report (SAR) event.
15,23A 15.2. :3.1 2.13.2.3.1 Feedwater CN-TAS-02-30 Rev 0 The objective of the feedwater line break The changes are covered by the
...50.59 Review (Supplemental System Pipe LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 event analysis was to document the EPU LAR and specifically the Form Section information in Breaks LTR-TAS-Q4-119, Rev 4 impact of the following changes :
sections and/or tables listed in the ILA.5 (Le,,
Attach 3 to W3F1-An increase in rated power Supporting EPU PUR Section(s) dependent on 2004-0096)
Use of the CENTS code in place of column of this table.
LAR approval)
CESEC
'[5.2.3.2.-. -
~.~__
.._.~__.
2.13.2.12 Loss-of-Normal CN-TAS-03-3 Rev 1
~..__.....
..~.__
The objective of loss-of-normal feedwater
______ __._~. _~._W.._
The changes are covered by the 50.59 Review (Supplemental Feedwater Flow LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 flow with an active failure in the Steam EPU LAR and specifically the Form Section information in i with SAF In the Bypass Control System (SBCS) analysis sections and/or tables listed in the ILA.5 (Le,,
Page 14 of 83 FSAR Section 15.3.2.2 15.3.3.1 15.4.1.2 LI-101-01, Rev. 5
^
Supporting EPU PUR Sections) 1 2.13.3.2.2 2.13_3_3.1-....
. to W3171-2003-0074 (Table B3/4.0-1)
Additionally Letter W 3F 1-2(704-0071, Attachment I Section 4.1.1 2.13.4.1.1 2. 13,4.1.2 Table 2.13.0-2 Event
- Partial Loss of Forced Reactor Coolant Flow with SAF Single Reactor Coolant
,Pump(RCP) Shaft
`SeizurelSheared Shaft Supporting Calculation(s) f Document(s)
CN-TAS-03-18 Rev 1 LTR-TAS-04-21, Rev 1 CN-TAS-03-10 Rev 0 -
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4
( Uncontrolled CN-TAS-02-70 Rev 1 Control Element LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 Assembly (CEA)
Withdrawal from Subcritical Uncontrolled CEA CN-TAS-02-70 Rev 1 Withdrawal from I LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 Table 1_
Affected FSAR Sections Remarks No changes to FSAR. Section 15.3.2.2 It is not possible to identify any credible single failure of an active component which would affect the DNBR during the first few seconds of the transient (the most limiting time period) and cause the partial loss of forced reactor coolant flow to produce consequences more severe than those following a single reactor coolant pump shaft seizure (FSAR 15.3.3.1).
The total toss of forced reactor coolant flow was analyzed for power uprate to evaluate the impact of the following changes The increase in rated thermal power to i
3716 MWt The decrease in core inlet temperature to 533°F The use of the CENTS code rather than the COAST code to generate to flow coastdown curves which are input into the 1-D HERMITS model for fuel failure evaluation The objective of the uncontrolled CEA withdrawal (CEAW) from subcriticat conditions analysis was to document the impact of the following changes The increase in rated power from 3441 MWt to 3716 MWt, The use of the CENTS code instead of the CESEC code, Starting at 10% subcritical.
The impact of the above changes results in no violation of the specified acceptable fuel design limits (SAFDLs).
The objective of the uncontrolled CEA bank withdrawal from critical condition Nature of Changes Made to the 50.59 Review FSAR Category No changes.
The changes are covered by the
.. ~ 50.59 Review...
- Form Section sections and/or tables fisted in the ; II.A.5 (i.e.,
Supporting EPU PUR Section(s) dependent on column of this table.
I LAR approval)
Additionally, Letter W3F1-2004-0071, Attachment 1 Section 4.1.1, Supplement to Alternate Source t
Term Submittal, is the basis for the statement on page 15.3-7 that states : "
...no more than 15.0 cent of the fuel rods will experience DNB."
a, The majority of the changes are covered by the EPU LAR and The changes are covered by the 5[1.59 Review EPU LAR and specifically the Form Section sections and/or tables listed in the II.A.5 (i.e.,
Supporting EPU PUR Section(s)
I dependent on column of this table.
{ LAIR approval) 517.59 Review Form Section
L" 0
1-O1, Rev. 5 50.59 REVIEW FORM i - -
fable -4" Affected FSAR Sections FSAR Section Supporting EPU PUR Section(s)
Event Supporting Calculation(s) I Document(s)Document(s)
Remarks I
Nature of Changes Made to the 60.59 Review FSAR Category Low Power LTR-TAS-04-119, Revd event analysis was to document the specifically the section,, and/or HA-5 ps, impact of the following changes :
tables listed in the Supporting dependent on The increase in rated power from 3441 EPU PUR Section(s) column of LAR approval)
MWt to 3716 MWt this table
. See b below for those The use of the CENTS code instead of changes not explicitly the CESEC code addressed in the EPU LAR.
The; impact of the above changes results b. The change on page 1 15.4-&
in no violation of the SAFDLs.
(Insert 15.4.13) was not in the equivalent PUR Section, however, this entry is supported by the listed calculation TAS-02-70) which was (CN-~
performed to support this section and the PUR, and therefore implicitly covered by the EPU LAR, 15A13 2.13.4.1.3 Uncontrolled CEA CN-TAS-02-70 Rev 1 l The objective of Uncontrolled CEAVV at The changes are covered by he 5019 Review Withdrawal at CN-TAS-02-95 Rev 0 power event analysis was to document EPU LAR and specifically the Form Section Power LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 the impact the following changes :
sections and/or tables listed in the HA.5 (Le, LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 An increase in rated thermal power to Supporting EPU PUR Section(s) dependent on 3716 IVIWt column of this table LAR approval)
A change from the CESEC to the CENTS code as the primary NSSS simulation tool A reduction in steam generator pressure A reduction in CEA worth at trip The impact of the power uprate results in i
no violation of the SAFDILs for this SAR
- event, i
15AAA 2.13.4.1 A CEA Misoperation CN-TAS-02-92 Rev 0 The purpose of this analysis was to
............ -1------
a
. The majority of the changes are50.59 Review CN-TAS-03-69 Rev 0 demonstrate that the full-length CEA drop covered by the EPU LAIR and Form Section LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 event does not violate the DNBR and specifically the sections anchor HAI 0Y.,
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 LHR SAFDLs for Waterford 3 with power tables listed in the Supporting dependent on uprate at 3716 MWt EPU PUR Section(s) column of ~ LAR approval) this table. See b below for those changes not explicitly addressed in the EPU LAR.
b. The changes on page 15.4-12 (18% radial peak to average
15.4-1,5 15.4.1.6 Page 16 of 83 FEAR Section LI-101-01, Rev. 5 pporting EPU Section(s) I Event Inadvertent Boron Dilution Startup of an-
..~.~
Inactive RCP Modes 3, 4 or 5 with all CEAs on the Bottom Supporting Calculation(s)1 Docurnent(s)
CN-TAS-03-59 Rev 0 Reference Attachment 1 to Letter W3F1-2004-0061 (RAI Q&R 15)
LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 CN-TAS-03-18 Rev 1 Reference Attachment 1 to Letter W3F1-2004-0061 LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 50.59 REVIEW FORM No non-editorial changes to FSAR~.~...
Section 15.4.1.5.
The inadvertent boron dilution analysis is performed to provide values for the Boron Dilution Alarm and, when the alarm is inoperable, required boron measurement surveillance frequencies in the COLR, which ensure that adequate time remains for the operators to take corrective action.
The existing analysis has identified combinations of Inverse; Boron Worth (IBWs) and Critical Boron Concentrations (CBCs) which support the current E setpoints and surveillance frequencies.
The reload process checks actual core designs against these combinations for verification of the setpoints.
As the increase in rated thermal power has not affected the RCS volume or the charging pump capacity, the existing analysis remains valid.
No non-editor¬al changes_. to. FSAR Section 15.4,1.6 With less than 4 RCPs running the core is subcritical. The maximum temperature differentials between the steam generator and the primary system for which an inactive reactor coolant pump may be Nature of Changes Made to the ~
50.59 Review Category FSAR power densityat 100% and~...~._.
45% radial peak to average power density at 70%) were not in the equivalent PUR Section, however, this entries are supported by the listed calculation (CN-TAS-03-69) which was performed to suppor this section and the PUR, and therefore implicitly covered by the EPULAR.
i Only editorial changes to this Editorial..
..^
section (i.e., change to a table number).
Only^. editorial changes to this..~
..~..W.
section (i.e., deletion of reference to specific cycle analysis).
Editorial
LQSmt~wS
~........
met 4~ d~ ~
~R ~ c ons
~.
o
/~kPU
~~_~~~.~.~
~
~~~
~ /mom
~~..~~~
~
,~
~
~
m@ @~anpa~ke& $e~ ~0S ~v _
R ~ ~ a(#
te e%
caEumlbn@>~
i
- mam,
~
~
@~ a on j..
~ ~ m~ t
~
.. ~_~~
~~ ~
. ~..
~....
. ~
~
~
~~ r~~
k~dam bth~~
i<<mGeaUk $e~~p_mHmm
.mew &9di >>s nm~h F~ R
}
~m~ is v m
~Sk~7~ ~ ~
~
~
~
~
~~\\\\~
2 \\<<<< %~ \\~ _
~
5o&m ~
vl
~ Gamy %F~ R s dm SaJ 7 ~ Wmg y
~q&
~mm<<e&!!<<h_M~m ~di amdb~4R~&m ;s:t<<
/,akske
~ mrw~ ~gmbmR ~$e~ bm~~eac~ dd@~ Gv6 e
~~~5m%%~vl mem~e mm a>>iq me mm A_r iG@m a~ m<<a~nmaG~
de#n+m mdQAGona mmp ~m
~~ e~ ~ ~ +meam~ m MPw m
~h CPC p a &ate ~
aap m~ ad
~m249%45 e~ k %emlA_mAG l
%Paumabe W~ _nd mer c r
~<<<<o me<<<<<<k$q mnb~k#
'recPC&9<<Guekcd&~_r uR~.my me @s Rdi as n
e~.>> qg.
j
/h~~6gaqmuB+u6k <<
mrNE~R~am~s*tT j\\\\\\}~~ ~ / \\km~ ~
m C~@~- w~ /mom.
~\\~ R~ Gm : ~~ m~ q/~~
~
~/~ R~ amp *~~
a~
/~~
m
~~ <<im aaFmi cN~ FSCATRSO%B
,~ imda ~
eew, S d $eF~ %
mmkymv k m ~
<<wi o a l
- ~ mmmyi~ an ~ ~~ S$£m,~v~
~+~ mtm_ k+r Gamw &w meF~ % k~ mtmmek~ &
§mPe<<r~s~,
%~~ ad Gum m~ e dame>~ m Waq~ @#,%mead Gze
~ ~ T
~~ g~% ~v4 ~ A m << mygmx~hG§yea mmGrma9<<~~ m m6em +.
C~~lr~sGama.
me~~&~6G~mm aC~~lr
~s mame.
~
x£4 2
~
~ ~
~
~
.. ~
+/-~ /~
\\ C
/~
Gon CNA~ $/~ ~
~ ~~
/o
. _~
~ ~...
~
. ~
~
~
<<+eoRb mAdeb~ m
. ~
~
/ dame ae m+\\/~ 6 ~+.m ~ u w
~
~ %~ y~ C%~,!
asemHyd~)e Gm qem ma~yG EeU~ Rads4~ ap~h
- ~ A ~
Gm
}
~ %~ ymglK RA4 ~smd<<umemth ~~ ~
J~h
+am&ad~ meaiwk bah ;H:
sKm~
- ba9q Gm7y
~P~mmEPURURSdw~)~+#k~ m
`
Ae~<<mam h U+~ _rE3~8 ~
umn7 m%gby
}~ Rap_k
%~
Cdm<<m6~kC~
r~im~b7Uemm+~m
~
ah~ m C~ EC % CEO S b l
Gma@me<<+~ muse##+
a meNS~
~&<< t7 z4%% t~ ~ ~
~
~h~ //~~ _
. /~ ~
So e~ a~ ~ ~ ~S(/~ \\~
/ t~~
G r i db pe +/-mom &am mmmd~ $e ~m.m ~ ~
w
Page 18 of 83 LI-101-01, Rev. 5 Volume Control System (CVCS)
Malfunction Supporting Calculation(s) 1 Docurnent(s)
CN-TAS-03-10, Rev. 0 Reference Attachment 1 to Letter W3171-20040061 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4
~_
Table
.3._._.._..
Affected FSAR Sections Remarks indicate that the section was not revised for power uprate and that the underlying conclusion for acceptability are not affected.
The following statement was added to Section 15.5.1.1 :
The Chemical and Volume Control System Malfunction was not revised for power uprate
. Although the timing of event will be slightly different for power uprate, the underlying conclusions of acceptability are not affected, The FSAR presentation for this event assumes that the core is initially at full power. The analysis accounts for a reduction in charging flow temperature due to the imbalance of charging and letdown. Power increases minimally due to the resulting cooldown. The results of the AOR would be insensitive to the MTC used (---3.5 x 10-4 Apl°F value was used as compared to the power uprate limit of -
4.2 x 10-4 apl°F). The transient result would not be significantly affected by the 3716 MWth power uprate. The results should be insensitive to the high pressurizer pressure trip setpoint because trip occurs shortly after the system goes water solid. The sequence of events and results will remain applicable for the power uprate so long as the 44 gpm per pump charging flow and 29 gp ¬n letdown flow used are preserved. The event timing documented in the FSAR was based on a maximum pressurzer spray flow of 375 gpm and would be insignificantly affected by an increase in pressurizer spray flow because full flow was not achieved. The analysis remains valid for up to 1000 plugged steam generator tubes.
Nature of Changes Marie to the FSAR EPU LAR and specifically the
'Form Section sections andfor tables listed in the H.A.5 ({.e.,
Supporting EPU FUR Section(s) idependent on column of this table.
fAR approval)
LI-104M, Rev. 5 Table I Affected FSAR Sections FSAR Supporting EPU Supporting Nature of Changes Made t(
Review Section PUR Section(s)
Event Calculation(s)
Remarks IT-4 Docurnent(s)
FSAR Category Additionally, a change to Tables 15.5-1 and 15.5-2 to reflect that the analysis was not revised for power uprate 15,5.1.2 2.13.5.1.2
~i-na~'ve en CINIJAS030 Rev No changes ~O FSAR Section 15.5_1.2 No chang NIA Emergency Core Reference Attachment 1 to This event is no more adverse than the Cooling Actuation Letter VV3FI-2004-0061 CVGS malfunction, UFSAR Section LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 15.5.1.1. The CVCS malfunction includes a coolant addition equal to or greater than the inadvertent operation of the ECCS.
There is no change to the safety injection system as a result of the increase in rated Thermal power. The FSAR discusses how the cutoff pressure of the safety injection system is below operating system pressures. Therefore the safety injection system would be incapable of actually discharging to the RCS even if an inadvertent actuation were to occur. This assessment remains valid at the uprated conditions.
15.5.2.1 2.13.5.2.1 CVCS CN-TAS-03-18 Rev 1 changes to FSA Section o changes NIA Malfunction with Reference Attachment I to The UFSAR presentation for this event SAF Letter VV3FI-2004-0061 assumes that the core is initially at full LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 power, The historical analysis accounts for a reduction in charging flow temperature due to the imbalance of charging and letdown, including the possibility of letdown flow isolation.
Power increases minimally due to the resulting cooldown. The results of the
'AOR would be insensitive to the MTC used because a highly negative -3,5 x 10-4 Ap/'F value was used (as compared to the power uprate limit of -4.2 x 10-4 Ap/'F). The transient results are not significantly affected by the 3716 MWth power uprale. The results are insensitive to the high pressurizer pressure trip setpoint because trip occurs shortly after the systemgoes solid. The sequence of
LdS$tR~ s
~:9kEwk~FOR~
... ~ ~. ~ ~ ~.~~
~
~ ~ ~...
~ men
~~l~~AR~~~>>
~~°~9~~ ~~~~.~ ~~~~p ~g
~
~~~
~~~jd/~~~~~~o$e'~<<~/~
PUR ~ ~ ~
W~
~
eG cmmQlb%4Z s
malls FA R
~
- ~ >
~
Am~~
~~~~~
e~ >>md>>m6 aummmnapp~ ~~
~~~
~~~ ~
~~~
f~~ruPUem§q+he~7m pry mp G<<gi +wad A g~
G~~ +wa+ammeer¢
~%m7$egmlta9dm~~ah
~h U~ &R ~s~ mdonamaWum pr m#ea~y+wa~sg~ aW sue<<msn~a#yA~k&+
a~ Rempmau&+/- +ay +_
<<mmeU~+w~amla+/-~ k.
Tk ~ &R~ cas na mm GeM G
- ~ u+du~n~>>~ g4_ug GW %r
%eR<<gGe>>9 &ebme aa&er *adu#m 7 kdmmm cGdG 4mpaAmw ~e~ _r um~ ~@4dm~d++e maim
- mp ap qy mrme~ r mmb@~Gew a ~i+/- me Pr m&e mug <<
.mm~ bk.TWr om~w <<any <<mth
\\~ R G m!~ ~ k & me 9~
r 7A6
,&EZl
+/-,aw14 S~ BPM~ 7 cm~ s<<32 ~
vo T eo§~ ~ a me~~ a nB+ 5mw ~ eWm7&am mm~ b me ~q~ ~ u w
eee#
~ m~ y<<J>>~v2 memo<< m~ a~ &~ S me>>
E~ ~ RmdB<<c ep~h
~ r~ 6m O~ we
~ ~~ ymglfRv4 am~A&~syd<<umem~wi~a M mamam~zr%~~sns db~h H: sKw
~ aim meUa6m mamma Sm&mm~UeUR~&m%) u<<m+m m i<<m+eeUk~~r~m #y ~umnam&bhy
~~Ra+r m 2~ 2a2em~~
k aage9 meC~ ~ m&,aW ae/c i Jamee +gmi m~
T~ mAd2lGa+m dam<<ru6 ami<<e#eb~h >>dai ama
<<ukaR(~ m mab~~ A~lm ~m
(~ 2 mdwa ~~d mm ~ ~
Rt
~
ga ~~mnm9eme&~ ~Nn me<<7ea Gs~:ER&&2m6~ A-
~
mommu~ skier 6a ~
mnmq+<<e 6~eMC~~tr~6
~..
y~ \\~~
. ~ ~ ~.
~
~ymm~mUm~CNJ~<<~~.
A!~
~.
~ ~
~
. ~~.
k A\\dm w~ ~~ <<mU/~~e~\\R\\<<+~
. /~\\ q~\\<< ;m.m~uw.
uam3t~ws R
~ ~
on UR ~ ~
SpP~mgE~~~~~
a
~ ~
~~om~
Cap mAonb}~
~
cum_<)
~ mR~
~~~~~~.~~~.
.~~~~mum<<c~~~~~~jm/^~oA~w~
B AR Ck~ oR
/~~ ~p~ ~!!~ 2 }&Ry~~ ~
~~~ ~ ~xJm&2~ ~ 2 ate! m 7Gr )w h~ ~ ~ G6 ~ ~ rt yen i k
~!J&y~ ~~ ~ F~ ~
G3~
~
4% aaQ2m£ %elm
~~~5<<<<4K~v4 %009 >>§A&~&% mm_mhe AW~~lm 7GTS and
%:SKS m%>
~
W#aemebl~aim damq Pre~dbemm#hthm
%+m+4m CGge~ m CEO C % C~ ~ << be ak&
~
R +Kam}
/~ 9 Q_~lm~
~
+ SGT ~
hmla m<<ur w
&+~>>ebmm<<a9w~lm
~9<<~s%~~%
pGmmGd>> b me up %
Suw~i ~%E37!
~ m~ md6~Nq 3 meMes E ~
TRa~ #a wh p
m<<uAm~ 6 a ~!!;y T~ Wp G y meEPU mm6ah m
~ ~
cDNRR PeA~ ame
~#m y m~ mum RCS ma58
~ +,SuG~ an ew 1z2
\\r mmnm6~ me~Rge~.
c SGT ~hacmo~ m~al a0~m~~r
~d6gi~~eq+m<<
Caa.suW~ i lfEaw% ~
>>w ads r AW~hl~h ~CTR l
~hammuA4~>><<~ge
- ~ _rte amenmmq mmko U~
~adwgia~maG+<<<<,
~BrmK~ymeSOSR~B mcurm~wa~e6~~r
~ ar aa~y k. ~ ammo me wmkow~mammurm~a~
a Awe~~r~;+~~ dab M me m&meDNBR AAr a<<e
~~m~s+~%k.pewemm
~smm~dSGTR~ha CmGrm~a<<~syP~r mdmmm<<md+ aw+>>
T<< Ga9mammmmd&~h EPU~ Ra<< 9c eyyme
~+Gmaad~ bb~ R!k bah
~~\\~~~~~~~~..
~
~~ ?~ %q e
ens umna mG Q~l
~
- 45.
a~ \\S.
z3
~~ Ca
~~~ ~~ \\ ~~ ~
~~ jm/\\mp, a ~
~
\\\\ y7\\\\/\\G `~ t
>>a~~ ~ ~
m\\~' m\\~~ A
~~ dQq~
HER
~~mgmcm 4\\E\\~ ~
\\~2; ~~ ~
~ ~ ~
~~
9~ ~
k
/~
~
0~~ \\/~ vo
\\~
~
~
gmw c
\\ Cmw~ Alem A~ ~ k<< Gs ~
\\gy m '+.q ~ _>
(~ ~ SCOPS
~
CA
~ ~ O~~ J7~ v2
(~ CS AAr a<<eam~y &
eye G&c ym+r ~ me
~ A ~ 4m
+_~ Uk m~ ~ mm bah ~ ~ ~ U~ Rbp~ em& memamsH: sp>>.
U-101-01, Rev. 5 Supporting EPU -_
..-~..-...____-
Supporting
.-_.._-. ~..
.._._.._...__m...._
_.._._~. _._,
FSAR PUR Section(s) +
Event Calculation(s)1 Remarks Nature of Changes Made to the 50.59 Review Section Docurnent(s)
FSAR Category acceptance criteria for light water nuclear -and/or tables listed in the Idepenoenton power reactors, 10CFR50.46, for Supporting EPU PUR Section(s)
LAR approval)
Waterford 3 at the power uprate rated column of this table) or by the and editorial.
core power of 3716 MWt (3735 MWt listed calculation (CN-TAS-02-58) including a 0.5% power measurement which was performed to support uncertainty). Analyses were performed this section and the PUR, and for a spectrum of large-break (ass-of-therefore implicitly covered by the coolant accidents (LOCAs). FSAR EPU LAR. Additionally, there are ~,
Section 15.6.3.3.3.1 describe the ECCS various editorial changes in this performance analysis for Waterford 3.
section such as deletion to specific cycle evaluations, changing of references from Combustion Engineering to Westinghouse, spelling out CE as I, Combustion Engineering, etc.
15.6.3.3.3.2
..W3F1-2004-Q052
....~
` Smail Break GN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 An Emergency Core Coating System The changes in this section are
!50.59 Review Attach 5, Section Z CA LTR-OA-04-77 Rev 2 (ECGS) performance analysis covered by the EPU LAR Form Section 2.12.4
,dernonstrated conformance to the ECCS (specifically the sections and/or II,A.5 (i.e.,
(LOCA SCOPE) acceptance criteria for light water nuclear tables listed in the Supporting
~d ¬ pendent on power reactors, 10CFR50.46, for EPU PUR Section(s) column of j LAR approval)
Waterford 3 at the power uprate rates!
this table).
land editorial.
core power of 3716 MWt (3735 MWt Additionally, there are various including a 0.5% power measurement editorial changes in this section uncertainty). Analyses were performed such as changing of references for a spectrum of small-break loss-of-from Combustion Engineering to coolant accidents (LOGAs). FSAR I Westinghouse, differentiating Section 15,6.3.3.3.2 describes the ECCS Combustion Engineering scope of j performance analysis far Waterford 3.
analysis, renumbering table and figure numbers, correcting typo to 6.3.3.3.1 156 23
,1 15.6.3-4
- ~Pressurizer
~The on page et 2.13.6.3.4 and LTR-OA-03-54, Rev. 1 No technical change to 15.6.3.4 /not changes in this section are 150.59 Review 2.12.6 Safety Valve Lift LT R-OA-04-77 Rev 2 limiting location far LOCA},
covered by the EPU LAR Farm Section (LOCH SCOPE)
The primary conclusion of the FSAR (specifically the sections and/or
' II.A.5 (i.e.,
analysis is that the inadvertent opening of tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on a pressurizer safety valve LOCA is
'PUR Section(s) column of this LAR approval) bounded by a SBLOCA in the pump table).
land editorial, discharge leg
. This FSAR analysis conclusion is independent of care power leve l.
LI-101-01, Rev, 5 TaWe I Affected FEAR Sections FSAR Supporting El Supporting PUR Sections)
Event Calculation(s)
Remarks Nature of Changes Made to tf 50.59 Review Section Document(s)
FSAR Category Section 15.6.3,4 was revised to indicate that the analysis was evaluated for EPU impact but was not reanalyzed 15,7.3.4 2.13.7.3.4 Fuel-Handling N/A No changes to FSAR Section 15,7.3.4 No changes 1 NhA Accident (FHA)
LTR-RCPL-04-32, Rev 0 KA31 2.13_7.3.5 Spent Fuel Cask N/A No changes to FSAR Section 15.7.3.5 No changes N/A Drop Accidents LTR-RCPL-04-32, Rev 0 15.8 2.13,8 ATWS NIA No changes to FSAR Section 15.8 No changes NhA LTR-RCPL-04-32, Rev 0 15.9.1.1 2.13.91.1 Asymmetric CN-TAS-02-78 Rev 0 The objective of the asymmetric stearn The changes are covered by the 50.59 Review Steam Generator LTR-RCPL-04-32, Rev 0 generator transient (ASGT) analysis was EPU LAIR and specifically the Form Section LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 to demonstrate that the ASGT event does sections and/or tables listed in the lLA.5 (i.e.,
not violate the DNBR and LHR SAFDLs Supporting EPU PUR Section(s) idependenton
!for Waterford 3 with power uprate at 3716 column of this table LAR approval)
MWt. The analysis was performed for the power uprate to evaluate the impact cf; z
Change in most negative moderator
~
temperature coefficient (MTC) from -
4
-4
.Oxl0ApPF to 4.2x10 4 rip/°F Use of CENTS rather than CESEC Increase in rated thermal power A decrease in the CPC differential cold leg temperature trip setpoint from 18*F to 1VF.
Appendix A N/A iSupplemental N/A Historical Information, no changes N/A N/A Information for require?
Chapter 15 in
=Response to Waterford 3 (NUREG-0787)
Open Items 8 through I I ntainment NIA This appendix is Dose related and not NIA NIA
'Leakage and within scope of this ER. Ref Dose
~Madels Calculation I
W3000006000
LI-101-01, Rev. 5 Supporting EPU PUR Section(s) 1 Appendix D NIA i Supplemental Cycfe Specific Event Analyses Event
[Supplemental I
Informafon for
,Chapter 15 in Response to Waterford 3 (NUREG-0787)
Supplement No. 1 Confirmatory Items 15.3.1 and L R-TAS-04-119, Rev 4
_ Affected FSAR Sections Sup porting...
Calcporti(s)I
~.~.
Remarks Document(s)
N/A~
This appendix deleted, Cycle specific information has been replaced by EPU generated analysis and documented in appropriate FSAR Chapter 15 Sections.
Notes :
1
. Attachment 5 to Letter W3F1-2003-0074, Waterford 3 Extended Power Uprate Report. untess otherwise noted.
,_, ------,W_
~.._..
_..~_..-....
Nature of This appendix is deleted. The subject is encompassed by the information contained in sections 15.1.3,1 and 15.1.3.3 for Main Steam Line Break.
ges Made to the FSAR n of this table.
a. The majority of the changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table See b below for a change not explicitly addressed in the EPU LAR, b. The entry of 1.65 for Radial 1-pin peaking factor ;
(with uncertainty) in the Table was not in the equivalent PUP Table, however, this entry is supported by the listed calculation (Groundrules Calculation) which states : "For Power Uprate, a 1.65 maximum radialkea.king factor will be Nature of Changes Made to the '
50.59 Review FSAR Category The changes are covered by the 1 50.59 Review EPU LAR and specifically the Form Section sections and/or tables listed in the,
II.A.5 (i.e.,
Supporting EPU PUR Section(s)
' dependent on column of this table.
LAR approval)
The changes are covered bymthe~
.~ 50.59 Review ^
EPU LAR and specifically the Form Section sections and/or tables listed in the i
Il.A.5 (i.e.,
Supporting EPU PUR Section(s) dependent on column of this table,
- LAR approval)
FR 50.59 Review Category N/A overed by the E.PU LAR and les listed in the Supporting EPU 50.59 Review Form Section IIA.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section If.A.5 (i.e dependent on L.AR approval)
Table Supporting EPU No.
PUR Table' Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
~
. ~
sable ~_.
.._~
2 Affected FSAR Tables Cha 15.0- 1 No Change N/A No Change 15.0- 2 No Change NIA No Change 15.0-_3 2.13.0-3
._.~..-
...~~ -
LTR-TAS-04-119, ~Rev 4 The changes are specifically the ta PUR Table colu
~
115.0- 4 Z13.0-2 EC
-S03-001 (DR-N 03-.1
..19....
D)
Page 25 of 83 1-1-101-01, Rev. 5 50.59 REVIEW FORM Table No.
Supporting EAU FUR Table Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
Table 2 Affected FSAR Tables Nature of Changes Madeto the FSAR assumed : this is the specified maxim urn radial peaking factor assumed in radiological analyses.
More restrictive assumptions on radial peaking may be included in Westinghouse calculations (e.g., Fuel Management Guidelines) and are tracked as part of the PAC Assessment process," The values reported in the PUR are more conservative than 1.65 which is consistent with the groundruies, and therefore implicitly covered by the EPU LAR.
50,59 Review Category W-1 2.13.1.1.3-2 CN-TAS-02-96 Rev 0 Table 7.3.1.1,3-2 a. The majority of the changes are covered by the EPU 5039 Review Form Section li.A.5 (i.e.,
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 LAR and specifically the tables listed in the dependent on LAR approval)
Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table.
See b below for those changes not explicitly addressed in the EPU LAR.
b. Several entries (tunes 27.4, 160.5, 179.1, 257.0, 350.2, 1000.0 seconds) in the Table were not in the equivalent PUR Table, however, these entries are supported by the listed calculation which is the basis for the rest of the table, and therefore implicitly covered by the EPU LAR.
151-2 1131.13-1 CN-TAS-02-96 Rev 0 Table 7.3.1.1.3-1 a The majority of the changes are covered by the 50.59 Review Form Section 11,A.5 (i.e.,
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the dependent on LAR approval)
Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table See b below for those changes not explicitly addressed in the EPU LAR, b, One entry (reactor regulating system) in the Table was not in the equivalent PUR Table, however, this entry is supported by the listed calculation which is the basis for the rest of the table, and therefore implicitly covered by the EPU LAR.
111-3 2,13.1.1.4-2 CN-TAS-02-87 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section H.A.5 (i.e.,
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the tables listed A Me Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table 151-4 2.13.1.1.4 -1 CN-TAS-02-87 Rev I a
The majority of the changes are covered by the 50,59 Review Form Section H.A.5 (Le-,
UR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the dependent on L AR approval)
Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table.
See b below for those changes not explicitly addressed in the EPU LAR.
b. One entry (total nuclear heat flux factor) in the Table was not in the equivalent PUR Table, I
I
t_1-101-01, Rev. 5 Dose Scope 213.1.2.3-3 LTR-TAS-04
.1.19, Rev 4 _
Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
Table 2 Affected FSAR Tables Changes Made to the FSAR however, this entry is supported by the listed calculation which is basis for the rest of the table, and therefore implicitly covered by the EPU LAR.
Reference ER-W3-2004-0276-000 Dose Scope Reference E_R-W3_
2004-0276-0(30 Dose Scope
._.-.~~_~_
~._.~
7_
Rference 1=R-W3-2004-0276-000 _
C AS 2 33 Re Table.3 1.2.3-3
~ a. The majority of the changes are covered by the LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table.
See b below for those changes not explicitly addressed in the EPU LAR.
CN-1 AS-02-33 Rev 1 Table 7.11.2,3-2
.._ ~..
R-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 15.1-9A ~ Was 15.1-9, Editorial
° This table is Dose related and not within Change scope of this ER.
15.1-10 1 2.13.1.2.3-1 1 CN-TAS-02-33 Rev 1 Table 7,3.1.2.3-1 LT R-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 b. One entry (steam generator safety valves open) in the Table was not in the equivalent PUR Table, however, this entry is supported by the fisted calculation which is basis for the rest of the table, and therefore implicitly covered by the EPU LAR.
Table was defeted in the new analysis a.
The majority of the changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the fables listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table.
Sera b below for those changes not explicitly addressed in the EPU LAR, b. One entry (steam generator safety valves open) in the Table was not in the equivalent PUR Table, however, this entry is supported by the listed calculation which is basis for the rest of the table, and therefore implicitly covered by the EPU LAR.
f Only editorial changes to this tabfe(i.e., change to a -
table number). Reference ER-W3-2004-0276-000 a. The majority of the changes are covered by the.
EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table.
See b below for those changes not explicitly addressed fn the EPU LAR.
b. Two entries (initial SC water level, FTC) in Table were not in equivalent PUR Table, however, these entries are supported by the listed calculation which is the basis for the rest of the table, and NIA 50.59 Rev1ew 1Form 1Sectian 11f 11 A.5 {Le.,^.
dependent on LAR approval) 50.594 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,.
dependent on LAR approval)
. 50.59 Review Form Section ii.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval)
Editorial ~~
50.59 Review Form Section ILA.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval)
Page 27 of 83 1-1401M Rev. 5 Change 213.1-2,4-1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 2.13.1-3.1-5 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev I Table 2.13,1.3.1-5
!mI'R-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 to W3FI-2004-0096) 2.13,1.3.'t0 (Revised per Attach I W3F1-2004-0096)
Was 15.1-14, EditorjaU This table 3 Owe related and not within Change scope of this ER.
2ATIAl-7 CN -TAS-02-97 Rev I Table 2.13.1.3.3-7 (Revised per Attach I LT'R-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 to W3F 1 -2004-0096) 2111011 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev I Table 2.13.1,3.1-8 (Revised per Attach I LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 to W3F 1 -2004-0096) 2.13.1.3.1-1 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Table 2.13.1.3.1-1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section H.A.5 (i.e.,
specifically the tables hod A We Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table column of Mh Able.
Only editorial changes to this table (i.e., change to a Editorial (Revised per Attach 1 to W3171-2004-0096)
Was 15117, Editorial Supporting CalculationlDocurnent(s)
This table is dose related and not within scope of this ER.
CN-TAS-03-9 Rev 0 Table 7.3.1.2.4-3 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 This table 4 Dose related and not within scope of this ER.
CN-TAS-03-9 Rev 0 Table 70 1 1A q CNJAST207 Rev I Table 2A31aU6 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the tables hod A Me Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table.
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 This table is Dose related and not within scope of this ER.
CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Table 2.13.1.3.1-2 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 W~3F1-2004-0096) 15.1-18A Was 15108, Editorial s Dose related and not within Change scope of this ER.
Table 2 Affected t;SAFt Tables Nature of Changes Made to the FSAR therefore implicitly covered by the EPU LAR.
Only editorial changes to this table (i.e., change to a table number). Reference ER-W3-2004-0276-000 The changes an covered by the EPU LAR and 1 specifically the tables listed A he Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table.
Only edhoriM changes to this table OR, Bane to a table number). Reference ER-W3-2004-0276-000 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table_
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and I -------- - -
specTcally the tables hod K he Supporting EPU FUR Table column of this table.
Only editorial changes to this table (i.e., change to a table number), Reference ER-W3-2004-0276-000 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EF'U FUR Table column of this table.
table number). Reference ER-W3-2004-0276000 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table.
Only editorial changes to this table (i.e., change io a I table number), Reference ER-W3-2004-0276-000 Editorial 50.59 Review Form Section H.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval)
Editorial 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 {iR, dependent an LAR approval}
50.59 Review Form Section O.A.5 (iR_
dependent or) LAR approval)
"' e w- ~o eVlr Section M A A dependent ori LAR approval)
Editorial 50.59 Review Form Section H.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section ll.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Forrn Section H.A.5 (i.e-,
dependent on LAR approval)
Editorial
Page 28 of 83 Change 51-i6 2.13.1.3-1-4 (Revised per Attach 1 to W3F1 -2004-0096)
Was 15.1-20, Editorial 15.1-25 15.1-26 15.1-27 152-1 151-2 1-11040t Rev. 5 PUR Table' 2.13,1.3.1-3 (Revised per Attach I to W3 F 1 -2004-0096)
Was 15.1-99, Editorial Change Existing FSAR Table 151-21 Existing FSAR Table 15.1-22 2.13.1.3.3-3 (Revised perAttach 5toW3FI-2004-0096)
Existing FSAR Table 95.1-23, No Change 2.13.1-13-1 (Revised per Attach 5 1132.1,3-2 2.13.2.1.3-y Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Table 213.1.3.1-3 TR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 This table is Dose related and not within scope of this ER.
CN-TAST207 Rev I Table 2111014 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev4 This table is Dose related and not within scope of this ER.
N/A LTR-J'AS-04-119, Rev 4 CN-TAS-03-23 Re
.I LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev4 CN-TAS-03-23 Rev 1 I-TR-TAS-D4-119, Rev 4 N/A to W3 F 1-2004-0029 -
L13A.3,3-2 CN-TAS-0303 Rev 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 CN-TAS-02-53 Rev I L-TR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 CN-TAS-02-53 Rev 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 CN-TAS-03-23 Rev I LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 50.59 REVIEW FORM Table 2 Changes Made to the FSAR The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Table column of It table Only editorial changes to this table (i.e., change to a Editorial table number). Reference ER-W3-2004-0276-000 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table.
Only editorial changes to this table (i.e., change to a table number). Reference ER-W3-2004-0276-000 No changes The event for which this table supports is not affected by EPU and hence was not reanaQzed. The table was revised to reflect this and to add clarifying statements in a footnote. Therefore it is implicitly covered by the EPU LAR The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the Supporting FPU PUR Table column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table.
No technical changes (formatting corrections only}
Editorial changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the tables fisted in the Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table.
The changes am covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed A the Supporting EPU 50.59 Review Category 50.59 Review Form Section H.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section H.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval)
Editorial 50.59 Review Farm `Section ll,A,S (in.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50,59 Review Form Section ll.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent an LAF't approval) 50.59 Review Form Section H.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAIR approval)
PUR Table column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e,,
specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU
~ dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table.
50,59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section dependent on LAR approval)
Ddeted L1-109T1, Rev. 5 1.1 3.2.3.1-2 (Revised per Attach 5 to W3 F 1 -2004-0096) 2.13,2.3.1-1 2132aP4 (Revised pei
, Attach 5 to W3FI-2004-0096) 2.1 3.2.3.1-3 (Revised ;)or Attach 5 to W3 F 1-2004-0()2
.1323.2-2 to W3F1-2004-(7096) 2A&W11 Affected
FSAR Tables Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
CN-TAS-03-3 Rev I LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I CN-TAS-03-3 Rev I (LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4)
ATIR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 CN-TAS-02-30 Rev 0 Table D-2 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 CWTASOX30 Rev 0 Table p-I R-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 CIA-TAS-02-30 Rev 0 Table 0-4 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 1 CWTAST230 Rev 0 Table D-3 LI-R-TAS-04-119, Rev 4
-C N--TA S
-- --03,--3, --R-ev--1-'-
LTR-TAS-04-119
, Rev 4 R-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 CN-TAS-03-3 Rev I LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 CN-TAS-02-98 Rev 0 Table 7.3.3.2.1-2 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 CN-TAS-02-98 Rev 0 Table 7.3.3.2.7-1 LTR-TAS-04119, Rev 4 TaWe 2 Changes Made to the FSAR PUR Table column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Table column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Table column of this table.
Table was deleted in the new analysis e changes are covered by he EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed h the Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table.
The lh-e --changes "l----a-re- -covered by Iyl-the el-E--P--U----L--A--R- - -and specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table.
-LAA "!Ai
50
.59 Review Form Section fl.A.5 (i.e.,
The than are ca v.md by t e EP specifically the tables hod in the Supporting EPU
~ dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Table column of this table.
Table was deleted in the new analysis Table was deleted in the new analysis The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed W he Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU 50.59 Review Category 50.59 Review Form Section 11,A,5 (i.e_
dependent on LAR
. approval) 50-59 Review Form Section IIA,5 (i.e,,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section JLA,5 (i,e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50,59 Review Form Section ILA,5 (i.e-,
dependent on LAR approval) 50,59 Review Form Section ILA.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section WAI (i",
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section fLA,5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50,59 Review Form Section N.A.5 (Le.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section H.A.5 (i,e-,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section II.A,5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section ILA.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50,59 Review Form Section HAA (iz.,
dependent on LAR approval)
Page 30 of 83 LAW10L Rev 5 Table 2 Affected FSAl2 Tables Table Supporting EPU Nature of No.
PUR Table 1 Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
Changes Made to the FSAR
..~
50.59 Review Category
.~
.`__ _...___..-_ _. _-
.-_. _._.~ _ _ _.
_^
PUR Table column of this table,
_.__ __.__..__. ___..____.__._.._._.. ~.
153-3 1133010 CNIAST310 Rev 0 Table 73.33-2 The changes are covered by the EPU LAIR and 50.59 Review Form Section ILA.5 (i.e.,
LTR-TAS-04-21, Rev I specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table.
153-4 Z11301-1 CNJASONIO Rev 0 Table 73011 The changes are covered by the EPU LAIR and 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (Le.,
(Revised per Attach 5 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev4 specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F 1 -2004-0096)
PUR Table column of this table.
53-4a DeNed LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 Table was deleted in the new analysis 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 15.3-4b Previously Deleted N/A N/A N/A 15.3-5 Previously Deleted NIA N/A N/A 15.3-5a Previously Deleted N/A N/A N/A 15.3-6 Previously Deleted NIA NhA N hA 151-7 Dde&d, Replaced by LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 Table was replaced by Table 15.3-4 in the new 50.59 Review Form Section 0,A.5 (Le-,
new TaNe I a 3-4 anaysis.
dependent on LAR approval) 15A-1 113A,1.1-2 GN-TAS-02-70 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section fl.A.5 (j,e.,
LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specTically the tables 11sted in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table.
15A-2 11111.1-1 CN-TAS-02-70 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section fI.A.5 (j,e" LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the taWes listed in the. Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table 15A-3 113A:120 CN-TAS-02-70 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form SectOn II.A.5 In, L.TR-I"AS-04-119, Rev 4 specificaMy the tables hhd 4 Me Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table 15A-4 113AA01 CNAAS0240 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section fl.A.5 (j.e.,
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table.
15A-5 Z13AA30 CN-TAS-02 55 Rev 0 Table 7,3.4. 1.3- ----."T-hle ch-Ong-e-s-a-re cov-e-r-ed-'Ilby the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 spedficalfy the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Table column of this table.
154-6 Z13A,VXI CPVTAS0205 Rev 0 Table 7.3.4,1.3-1 The changes are covered by Me EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section
-(j.e. '- ]
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specToalty the tables 40d A We Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval}
PUR Table column of this table.
15A-7 Z 114.1 AVI CN-TAS-02-92 Rev 0 App D Table D-1 He changes am covered by Me EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i,e,,
(Revised per Attach 5 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specificaily the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table conlumn of tWs tab!
No PIIR Table' I
Supporting CalculationlDocument(s) to W3F1-2004-0096)
~~____
....~.
F 2.1 ;3.4.1.4-2 CN-TAS-02-92 Rev0 App D Table D-2 LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 15.4-9 Deleted LI-101-01, Rev. 5 17 changed to 75.4-1 7
Previously Deleted N'A Original Table 15_4-11 NIA Deleted In FSAR Revision 13 Original Table 15.4-8 CN-TA_ S=
0
..3-8 Rev
_._3.__.-
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 CN-TAS-03-8 Rev 3..
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 Table 2 Affected FSAR Tables Nature of Changes Made to the FSAR T The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e_
specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU
, dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table.
With the new analysis for section 15.4 there. was one less table than with the original analysis.
N/A Only editorial changes to this table (i.e., change to a table number).
Only editorial changes to this table (i.e,, change to a fahtn nE,mhr r1 Only editorial changes to this table (i.e., change to a ble number)
}'
...__._ ~...-_
...__....._ ~.....__....___
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 1 50,59 Review Form Section fI.A.5 (i.e.,
specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent can LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table.
a The majority of the changes are covered by the EPL1 LAR and specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table See b below for those changes not explicitly addressed in the EPU LAR_
b. The value for Maximum RCS pressure is found in the listed calculation (CN-TAS-03-8) which is the basis for the rest of the table, and therefore implicitly covered by the EPU LAR
' a.
The majority of the changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table See b below for those changes not explicitly addressed in the EPU LAR.
b.
The values for CPCS VOPT setpoint and CPCS VOP Total response time are not found in the corresponding PUR table, however, they are found in the fisted calculation (CN-TAS-03-8) which is the basis for the rest of the tabl e, and therefore Editorial
^50.59 Review Form ~Section ll.A_5 (i.e.,,
dependent on LAR approval)
N/A Editorial 50.59 Review Form Section H.A.5 (i.e.,.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section 1f.A.5 (i,e_
dependent on LAR approval) 15_4.. 12 Original Table 15.4-changed to 15.4-12 15.4-13 0rigi~ial TabIe..
.15A-changed to 15.4-13 15.4-
....14
... ~_,_,.-.
2_13A.3.2-9 15.4-1,5 213A31-2
I-MAL Rev. 5 Table 2 Affected FSAR Tables Table No.
Supporting EPU PUR Table' Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
Nature of 50.59 Review Category Changes Made to the FSAR implicitly covered by the EPU LAR.
15A-17 Z13A.3.2-4 CN-TAS-03-8 Rev 3 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section ILA.S (i.e.,
(Revised per Attach 5 LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the tables listed h the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F 1 -2004-0096)
PUR Table column of this table (Original 15.4-17 Changed to 15.4-11, Editorial Change) 15.4-18 2.13.4,12-5 CN-TAS-03-8 Rev 3 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section ILA.S (i.e.,
L.TR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the taWes listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Table column of this table.
15.4 19 Was 15.4.
.1 110orkl This table 0 Dwe related and not within For the scope of this ER, the only changes made to Editorial Change scope of this ER Me table were editorial, i.e., changed table number.
Reference ER-VV3-2004-0276-000 151-1 N/A CN-TAS-03-18 Rev 1 The table is being revised to indicate that the analysis 50,59 Review Form Section 11,A.5 (i
.e
~
CN-TAS-03-10, Rev. 0 is not being revised. See discussion for Section dependent on LAR approval)
LTR-TAS-04-119. Rev 4
- lilail, 15.5-2 N/A CN-TAS-03-18 Rev 1 The table is being revised to rndicate that the analysis 50.59 Review Form Section ILA.S (i.e.,
CN-TAS-03-10, Rev, 0 is not being revised. See., discussion for Section dependent an LAR approval)
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4
- Tilalzl, 1
150-1 ZYWA-2 CN-TAS-02-41 Rev 0 Table 7,3.6.3.1-1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and I
50.59 Review Form Section 11A.5 (i.e.,
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU
, dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table.
151-2 ZUB.&Ild CWTAST241 Rev 0 Table 7.3.6.3.1-2 a The majority of the changes are covered by the 50.59 Review Form Section ILA.S (i.e.,
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the dependent on LAR approval)
Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table.
See b below for those changes not explicitly addressed in the EPU LAR.
and~
b-The values for Core outlet coolant temperature Secondary relief valve setpoint are not found in the corresponding PUR table, however, they are found in the listed calculation (CN-TAS-02-41) which is the basis for the rest of the table, and therefore implicitly covered by the EPU LAR.
15.6-3 Dose Scope This table is Dose related and not within Reference ER-W3-2004-0276-000 NIA scope of this ER, 151-4 1131320 CN-TA&011 5 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section ILA.S (i.e.,
Revised perAttach4 specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
~
... ~_
Table Supporting EPU abln o
Supporking Caleula 1.
r%ocurnen()
t lTabl 5 6.-
.. 1 15.6-12 L1-101-01, Rev
. 5 to W3F1-2004-0096)
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 15.6-4, E or a h1s tab e is Dose related and not within Change scope of this ER.
2.13.6.3.2-1 (Revised per Attach 4 to W3F1-2004-0096)
Previously Deleted Deleted N-TAS-03-15 Rev 1 LTR-TAS-114-119, Rev 4 This table is Dose related and not within
...^._
scope o ¬ this ER.
` _...
TR TAS-04 22 Rev "..
CN-TAS-03-15 Rev 1 LTR-TAS-04-22, Rev 2 50.59 REVIEW FORM Table 2 Affected FSAR Tables ature of Changes Made to the FSAR PUR Table column of this table.
For the scope of this ER, the only changes made tothe table were editorial, i.e., changed table number to 15.6-4A to accommodate new Table 15.6-4. Reference ER-W3-2004-0276-000 a. The majority of the changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table.
See b below for those changes not explicitly addressed in the EPU LAR.
b.
The value for Tolerance on MSSV Setpoint is not found in the corresponding FUR table, however, it is found in the listed calculation (CN-TAS-03-15) which is the basis for the rest of the table, and therefore implicitly covered by the EPU LAR.
Editorial °.
therefore implicitly covered by the EPU LAR, Reference ER-W3-2004-0276-000 N/A 50.59 Review Category
.50.59 Review Form Section ll.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval)
^
...__ - _..__.~~....__.._~m..
eferenceER-W3-2004-0276-ODD f
? N/A
---11111 1111---1.1111 With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e-tables than with the original analysis.
dependent on LAR approval)
....-,.,~~.-__ __.__
__~_
.. ~_...
With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e_
tables than with the original analysis.
dependent on LAR approval)
NIA NfA The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.513 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table
- a. The majority of the changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Table column of this table.
See b below for those changes not explicitly addressed in the EPU LAR.
b.
The values for Reactor Trip and SIAS are not found in the corresponding PUR table, however, they are found in the listed calc (CN-TAS-04-20 6-
- 6) which is the basis for the rest of the table, and
__r___.._.
..V50.59 Review Form Section H.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 1 Previously Deleted 12.12-4 NIA CN-OA-02 58 Rev l0 App B LTR-OA-04-77 Rev 2 Table 15.6-12 w...._
W 3F 1-2004
.-00
... 5
.L OA 0 0 Rev Table 6
Attach 5, Table 2.12-LTR-OA-04-77 Rev 2 10
2^..^
W 3F 1-2004-005 Attach 5, Table 2.12-7 5
4a W3 12004-0 052 Attach 5 Table 2.12-15.15 6-Eit or¬a Change d
I Ch 5 6 1&Editor
¬al Change 15.6_
Ed
- ...~
1 a tona Change L1-101-0"1, Rev. 5 not limiting location Supporting CalculationiDocument(s)
CN-OA-02-58 Rev
^0 App B Table 15.6-13 LTR-OA-04-77 Rev 2 CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Table 6-4~
LTR-OA-04-77 Rev 2 LTR-OA-04-77 Rev 2
.~
CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App 8 Table 15.6-14~
LTR-OA-04-77 Rev 2 CN-OA-04 20 Rev 0 Table 6-2 LTR-TAS-04 119, Rev 4 CN OA-02-58 Rev 0 App B Table 15_6-15 CN OA-02 58 Rev 0 App B Table 15.6=16V CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 LTR-OA-04-77 Rev 2
__NIA
.._.___..._.__~_.
This table is Dose related and not within N/A Table 2 Affected FSAIR Tables Nature of Changes Made to the FSAR The changes are covered ^by the EPU LAR and W specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAIR and specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table.
^This table was revised to reflect that the inadvertent Opening of a Pressurizer Safety Valve was evaluated for impact for EPU but the analysts was not reperformed.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and...~
specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table, The changes are covered. by the EPU LAIR and specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table Editorial changes were made to the table to reftect the resulting figures from the revised analysis for the Large Break LOCA Analysis.
Editorial change to table to clarify wording.
Editorial changes were made to the table to reflect the variables plotted due to the revised analysis for the Small Break LOCA Analysis.
N/A _....-_.....~
Reference ER-W3-2004-0276-000 N/A
-2004-0276-000..~_
vEditorial,.
..._..._ _mm Editorial Editorial.
50.59 Review Category 50.59 Review Form Section dh.A.5 (i.e_,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Rev v ew Form Section li.A-. ~.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) n 50.59 Review Form Sectio 11,A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50,59 Review Form Section Il.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 15.6-20 Dose Scope This table ¬s Dose related and not within Reference ER-W scope of this ER.
^
.~....
15.6-21 1 Nlo change to 15.6.3.4 -N A No change -
(riot limiting location for LOCA).
15.6-22
~No change to 15.6_3.4 N/A No change (not limiting location for LOCA).
15.6-23 No change to 1 ^5.6.3.4 NIA No changeW..~
15,6-24 1 Deleted, Replaced by I New Table 15.G-4 51-26 Deleted, Repined by New Table 15,6-6 Figure No.
15.0- 1 Deleted, Replaced by New Table 15.6-5 LI-101-01, Rev. 5 2.13.9.1.1-2.
.11-11-..
111-Supporting EPU PUR Figure 1 CN-TAS 15 Rev LTR-TAS-04-22, Rev 2 CN-TAS-03-15 Rev 1 LTR-TAS-04-22, Rev 2 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
specificafly the tables listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Table column of this table.
This table is Dose related and not within The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and scope of this ER specifically he tables listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table. (Note, new table CN-TAS-03-15 Rev 1 LTR-TAS-04-22, Rev 2 CN-TAS-03-15 Rev 1 LTR-TAS-04-22, Rev 2 CN-TAS-02-78 Rev 0 App D Table D-I LTR-RCPL-04-32, Rev 0 PUR Table column of this table, CN-TAS-02-78 Rev 0 App D Table D-2 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 Supporting CalculationIDocument(s)
Deleted I LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 CN-TAS-02-96 Rev 0 Fig 7.3.1.7.3-1 LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 CN-TAS-02-96 Rev 0 Fig 731 A 30 LTR-TAS791,-
.1 12, Rev. -O The changes are covered - by -
the -
Ei~UAR and specificaliy the tables listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table.
15.6-6 is not within the scope of this ER).
With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less tables than with the original analysis.
With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less tabi es than with the original analysis.
The changes are covered by be EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the tables listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Table column of this table.
F Notes :
1
. Attachment to 4, Waterford Extended i Power Uprate Report, unless otherwise noted.
TaWe 3 Affected FSAIR Figures The changes are covered by the 1=P11 LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU 5O,59 Review Form Section ILAA (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section IIA.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 O.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 5059 Review Form Section II.A.5 (in_
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent an LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section fl.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval)
Nature of Changes 50.59 Review Category Made to the FSAR 7
e parag raph-or in FSAii Section 5,6.i3.iwhich_
Review 1~
ectbn R&5 on.,
referenced this Figure was deleted, dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section ILAA On,,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section HA5 (i
.e dependent on LAR approval)
Page 36 of 83 No.
I PUR Figure' 15,1-3 Figure I
Supporting EPU W 01AL Rev. 5 2.13,1.1.3-3 2.13.1.1.3-5
~CN-TAS-02-g7 Rev 1_._.
LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 SupporUng CakulltilordDocurnent(s)
LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 CN-TAS0206 Rev 0 Fig 7.3.1.1.3-3 LTR-TAS-04-112, Rev. 0 LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 GN-TAS-02-96 Rev 0 Fig 7.3.1.1.3-4 LTR-TAS-04-112, Rev. 0 LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 CWTAS0206 Rev 0 Fig 7.3.1.1.3-5 LI'R-TAS-04-112, Rev. 0 L.TR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 CITTAST256 Rev 0 -Fig 7alA34 LTR-TAS-04-112, Rev, 0 LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev I C N-TAST266 Rev 0 Fy 7 a I A W LTR-TAS-04-112, Rev. 0 LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 4CN-TAS-02-9fi Rev 0 -Fig 7.3.1.1
.3-5_
L TR-TAS-04-112, Rev. 0 LI-R-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 CN-TAS-02-96 Rev 0 Fig 7,3.1.1.3-9 LTR-1-AS-04-112, Rev, 0 L.TR-TAS-04-27, Rev I CN-TAS-02-96 Rev 0 Fig 7.3.1.1.3-10 l-TRJAS04"Z Rev. 0 LTRJAS-04-27, Rev 1 CN-TAS-02-96 Rev 0 Fly T11,13-11 LTR-TAS-04-112, Rev. 0 LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 CN-TAS-02-87 Rev 1 LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev I Table 3 Affected FSAR Figures Nature of Changes Made to the FSAR PUR Figure column of this table, Ile changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by Ne EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed A he Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
50.59 Review Category 50.59 Review Form Section ll.A,5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50,59 Review Form Section H.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section H.A.5 (ix, dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 Om, dependent on LAR approval)
The changes are covered by the CPU LAR 5,0,59 Review Form Section 11A.
specifically the figures listed in the Support F, dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
The cha
.59 Review Forrn Section ILA.5 (i.e,,
ngos are covered bythe EPU LA R and specifically the figures listen A he Supporting Tdependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
The-changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section 11-A.5 (in, specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table, The-changes-are
-l---r---c-A-ve-r-ed -bl-jthe lib-&--X-Ran d-------
50,59 Review Form Section H.A.5 (in sycikWly the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on L.
..AR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table, The changes are covered by Me EPLJ LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section ll.kS On, specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU 50.59 Review-Farm ~Section^11.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section 11,A,5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval)
Page 37 of 83 LWOKOt Rev. 5 (Revised per Attach 5 to W3F 1 -2004-(I096) 13.1-1.4-5 to W3F1 -2004-0096) 15.1-26 2111230 Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
TAS-02-87 Rev 1 LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 CN-TAS-02-87 Rev I LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 CN-TAS-02-87 Rev I LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 CN-TAS-02-87 Rev 1 LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 CN-TAS0207 Rev I LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 CN-TAS-02-87 Rev 1 LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev I CN-TAS-02-33 Rev I FQ 70123A CN-TAS-02-33 Rev 1 Fig 701110 LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev I CITTAST203 Rev 1 Fig 7312&3 LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev I CN-TAS-02-33 Rev I Fig 7.3.1.2.3-4 LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev I G"__-__"___
35 ILTR-TAS-04-27, Rev I CPKTAS4213 Rev 1 Rg 731234 50.59 REVIEW FORM TKA Affected FSAR Figures Nature of Changes Made to the FSAR The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table, The, changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and speciflakly the figures listed M Me Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table, PUR Figure column of this table, T-he-changes -
sarc
-'-, `covered- 'by-the P-U",-L A- _Ra-specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU 1 PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and spocificafly the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table.
PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes am covered by be EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed 5 We Supporting EPtJ PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU L AR and I'specificaily the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPLI LAR and specifically the figures listed 0 We Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
50.59 Review Category 50.59 Review Form Section I LA,5 On,,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section 11,A,5 O-e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50,59 Review Form Section O.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section H.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50,59 Review Form Section JLA.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section ILA.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 0.59 Review Form Section TAZ On.,
dependent on LAR approval)
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section ll.A.5 (in, specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section H.A.5 {in.,
dependent on LAR approval}
50.59 Review Form Section 11,A.5 (in.,
dependent an LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section HA.5 (in.,
dependent on LAR approval)
- ', -,'--_ -
50.59 Review Fo Section 11
.A,5 01, r m dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section II.Al On,
lal-38 QWW Re, 5 1511 12111.2.4-2 TaWe 3 Affected FSAR Figures Nature of Changes Supporting Calculation/Document(si I
Made 10 the COMM R-TAS-04-27, Rev I I specifically the figures fisted in the Supporting EPU CN-TAS-02-33 Rev 1 Fig 7.3.1.2.3-7 LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev I CN-TAS-02-33 Rev 1 Fig 7.3.1 232 LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev I CWTAST203 Rev 1 Fig 7.3.1.2.3-9 CN-TAS-02-33 Rev 1 Fig 7012300 LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 PUR Figure column of this table, CN-TAS-02-33 Rev I Fig 7.3.1.2.3-11 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1
~i specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU CNAAS-02-33 Rev 1 Fig 7.3.1.2.3 02 LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 CN -TAS-03-9 Rev 0 Fig 701 QAd LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev I FUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU
~ PUR Figure column of this table.
f e changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table, The changes am covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed M Me Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table.
The changes an covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU Figure column of this table.
e changes am covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPLJ PUR Figure column of this table.
CNJAS&253 Rev 1 Fig 7.3.1.2.3-13
^
1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in to Supporting EPLJ PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table, CN-TAS-D3-9 Rev 0 Fig 7.3.1.2.4-2 1 The changes are covered by the EPLJ LAR and specifically the figures fisted in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
CN-TAS-03-9 Rev 0 Fig 7.3.1.2.4-3 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev I I
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU CN-TAS-03-9 Rev 0 Fig 7.3.1.2.4-4 LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 FUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and spe6fically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table, CN-TAS-03-9 Rev 0 Fig 7.3.1.2.4-5 Fhe c nges are covered by the EPU LAR and LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU 50.59 Review Category
--aepenijeW WEAK
-a-P'P'rO
. vo 50.59 Review Form Section H.A.5 (W dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Fofm Section HAA In, dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section 11A.5 (Le-,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section 11A5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section 11-AL (iA.,
dependent on LAR approval) 111-1- --- 11.11.
~
111-
. 111-111--11 i
50.59 Review Form Section H.A.5 (.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 5019 Review Fonr Section HAT (im, dependent on LAR approval) 50-59 Review Form Section 11A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section II A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section HAS_ (i
.e dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section HA5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section ll.A,5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval)
Page 39 of 83 L1-101-01, Rev, 5 to W3F1-2004-0096) 2:11WO2 (Revised per Attach 1 to W3F1-2004-0096)
I'll...
I'll 2.13.1.3.1-3 to W3171-2004-0096) 2.13.13.1-4 Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
CIA-TAS-03-9 Rev 0 Fig 7.3.1.2.4-6 LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev I CN-TAS-03-9 Rev 0 Fig 7,3.1.2.4-7 LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev I CN-TAS-03-9 Rev. Fig 7.3.1.2.4-8 LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev I CN-TAS-03-9 Rev 0 Fig T11 2AT LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev I GN-TAS-03-9 Rev 0 Fig 7312AOO CN-TAS-03-9 Rev 0 Fig 7.3.1.1.4-11 LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1 Table 3 Affected FSAR Figures Nature of Changes Made to the FSAR
~ FUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPLJ LAR and specifically the figures fisted in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and spedfically the figures listed in the Supporting FPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures fisted in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes am covered by the EPU LAIR and specifically the figures fisted in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by Me EPU LAR W id specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR arid specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table..
21112"12 1 CIA-TAS-03-9 Rev 6Fig 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and LTR-TAS-04-27, Rev 1
~ specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU j PUR Figure column of this table.
C N-TAS-03-9 Rev 0 Fig.7.3.1.2.4-13 CNJAS-02-97 Rev I Fig 2,13.1.3,1-1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev I Fig 2.13.9.3 1 A LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 CN-TAS-02-97Rev1 F02:1113.1-3 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2111&14 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures 140d 0 We SuppWAg EPU FUR Figure column of this table The changes are covered by the EPLJ LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table.
The changes am covenad by Me EPU LAF and specifically the figures listed 5 We Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table, The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU 5159 Review Form Section ILAL (i,e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50,59 Review Form Section IIA.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAIR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section 11,A,5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (ix, dependent on LAR approval) - 1.- -
50.59 Review Form Section H.A.5 dependent on LAR approval) 50,59 Review Form Section ILA-5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 -Review -Farm Section li.A,5 dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section If.A.5 (i.e.,-..u dependent on LAR approval) 50,59 Review Form Section ILA.5 Ok.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section ILA,5 Om, dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section ILA.5 (i.e.,
dependent an LAR approval}
FUR Figure column of this table,
~ The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and
~....5Q.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
I specifically the figures listed 0 Me Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
I PUR Figure column of this table,
U-101-01, L1-101-01, Rev. 5 ure No.
A._
Supporting ortin
._._~PU PUR Fi 9 ure Table Affected FSAR Figures
^...~._..
Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
Nature of Changes Made to the FSAR
.......~......._.._-__..
50.59 Review Category
[F
-51 2.13.1.3.1-5 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2.13.1.3.1-5 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section ti.A.5 (i.e.,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F1-2004-0096)
PUR Figure column of this table.
15.1_.~
.~
52
......_._ _._._._r.__
2.131.3.1-6 TCN
..~....._.__~.___.__.~.._
TAS 02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2.13.1,3.1-6 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and
~.._50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
.._.-___..W to W3F1-2004-0096)
PUR Figure column of this table.
15A-53 2,13.1.31-7
..~
CN-TAS 02-97 Rev 1 Fig
~..
.T 2.13.1.3.1-7
... _._...._.-.__ `_
....-..__. `__...... _
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section ILA.5
_~
(i.e.,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F1-2004-0096)
PUR Figure column of this table.
15-1-54 2-13.1.3.1-8
._.... _...._r._...
CN-TAS 02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2.13.1.3.1-8
..~..
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and E..50.59 Review Form Section Il.A.5 (i.e.,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F1-2004 0096)
PUR Figure column of this table
_......., ~...
15,1-55 2.13.1.3.1-9 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2.13.1.3.1-9 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and
~...50_59 Review Form Section ILA.S (i.e.,
[
(Revised per Roach ch 1 L1 -R-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent. on LAR approval) to W3F1-2004-0096)
~_.
_J FUR Figure column of this table.
15.1-56 2.13.1.3.1-10 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2.13.1.3.1-10 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section Ii.A.5 (i.e.,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU
- dependent on LAR approval) to W3F1-2004-0096)
PUR Figure column of this table.
15,1-57
.2.13.1.3.1-11 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2.13.1.3.1-11 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and
~~.50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F1,-2004-1)096) 1 PUR Figure column of this table.
` _
15.1-58
.....2.13.1.3.1-12 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2.13.1.3.1-12 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Fore} Section I1.A.5 (i.e.,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F1-2004-0096)
PUR Figure column of this table.
~_
15.
59 2.13.1.3.1 13 CN
_._.._~.._
TAS 02 97 Rev 1 Fig 2.13.1.3.1'!3
.......T........_-..____ _.....~..__.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and
_ ~..._....-_.
50.5.4 Review Form Section 11.A.5 (i.e.,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on t_AR approval)
_ to W3 F1-2004-0096)
PUR Figure column of this table.
15.1-60 2.13,13.1-14 CN TAS 02 97 Rev 1 Fig 2.13.1.3.1 14 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and
.. 50.59 Review Form Section 11.X5 (i.e.,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F1-2004-0096)
PUR Figure column of this table.
15.1-61 2_13.1 3.1-15 C
_1
_TR S 9 Rev 7...__-_....Fi 1
g 2.13,13.1-15 The he a e
..C.
covered by h e EPU LA
....~.._R.-....._.
and
_.._50__
.59 0
...Review -F rmSecfionll. A. 5 i.e.
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3 F1-2004-0096)
PUR Figure column of this table.
^...
15.1-62 2.13.1.3.1-16
^
CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2.13.1.3.1-16 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and
....50.59 Review Form Section 11X5 (i.e.,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
.....`..~
PUR Figure column of this table.
Page 41 of 83 20R Figure' 1
2.13.1.3.1-17
~CN-TAS-Q2-97 Rev 1 Fig 2.13.1,3.1-17 to VV3F 1 -2004-0096) 2.13.1.3.1-18 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2.13.1.3.1-18 (Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 to W3F 1-2004-0096) 213.1.3.
19 S-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2.13,1.3.1-19 (Revised per Attz tLTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 to W3F 1 -2004-0096) 0510t Rev. 5 CN JAST207 Rev 1 Fig 2.13.1,3.1-21 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2 13.13,1-25 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev4 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig
._2
.73.9.3
.1_26_.
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2.111,3.1-27 I LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 CN-TAST267 Rev 1 FQ 2A31 1108 50.59 REVIEW FORM Nature of Changes Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
Made to the FSAR CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2.13.1,3.1-20 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 (speoffically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table, Rev-i Fig 2.13.1.3.1-22
~ The changes are covered by the EPLJ LAR and LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed A Me Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU R
' ev 1, -F i g.13.13 1 -2 3 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2.111,11-24 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 Affected FSAR Figures The c an esa e covered specifically the films hod 0 Me Supporting EPU PUR. Figure column of this table.
The changes am covered by he EPATRAw-specificaily the figures fisted in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table PUR Figure column of this table, ne changes am covered by the EPLJ LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table, The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures hod A the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table e changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures ANd A the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table..
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
he changes are covered by the EPU LAR and i 50.59 Review Form Section lJ.A,5 PR, I dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Section 11 A5 dependent on LAR approval) s
.~eclfical~ the figures Iisted in.the,Supporting EPU 50.59 Review Category
-1vi,;Form Section dependent on LAR approval) ciioniL dependent an LAR approval) 50,59 Review Form Section fl.A,5 (r.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section JI.A.5 (La, dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section H.A.5 (Le.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section ll.A,S (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section HAS (in, dependent on LAR approval) 50,59 Review Form Section ll.A,5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section flLA.5 (in, dependent on LAR approval)
.59 Review Form Section 11,A.5 (i.e.,
to W3F 1 -2004-0096)
_.2. :.13
.13 A Al (Revised per Attach I to W3Fl-2004-0096) 2111&102 (Revised per Attach I to VV3F 1 -2004-0096) 1'51 - 69 2
.1 (Revised per Attach I to W3F 1 -2004-0096) 15,1-70 2.131,11 -24 (Revised per Attach I to W3Fl-2004-0096) 151-n
~ - 1- -
2.13.1.1105 (Revised per Attach I to W3F1-2004-0096]
11 5-72 2A3131106 (Revised per Attach 1 to W3F1 -2004-00 15.1-73 2-13,j1 1-27 (Revised per Attach 1 to W3FI-2004-0096) 15.1-74 2.13A.3,1-28
Page 42 of 83 L9-101-01, Rev. 5 Affected FSAR Figures
~.
Figure No.
Supporting EPU PUR Figure i
Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
Nature of Changes Made to the FSAR 50.55 Review Category I
._.~ ~..-
(
.Revised par A-ttach 1 0
9, F g o
t e
p on
~
pp a-.-taval~~
)
to W3F1-2004-Oi?96?
_.-.._ ._..
^
15.1-151-75 75 2.13.1.3.1-29
. I
......... _~__._
..r_
CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2.13.1.3.1-29 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) toW3F1-2004-0096)
PUR Figure column of this table.
15,1-76 rn 2.13.1.3.1-30 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2.13.1.3.1-30 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and
--50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,~
(Revised per Attach 1 I_TR-TAS-04-119 Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F1-2004-0096)
PUR Figure column of this table.
15.1-77
. 2.13.1.3.1-31
' CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2.13.1.3.1-31 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 5(3.59 Review Form Section ILA.5 (i.e.,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F1.-2004-0096) 1
~PUR Figure column of this table.
15_1 78 2.13.1.3.1-32
.'N""-
CTAS 02 7,
-9Rev
-e' v, 1 Fi-92-
. 3
.1,3.1 32 m
The changes are covered by the -
EP U -
LA R and 50.59 Review Form Section Ii,A.5 (i.e_
(Revised per Attach 1 t.TR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU 3 dependent on LAR approval) to W3Fl-2004-0096)
FUR Figure cofumn of this table.
15.1-79 2.13.1.3.1-33
' CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2.13.1.3.1-33 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section ILA.5 (i.e.,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 i specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to.,.W3Fl-2004-0096)
~` PUR Figure column of this table.
15.1-80 2.13.1.3.1-34 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2.13.1.3.1-34
... The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and
' SF).59 Review Form Section li-A.5 (i.e.,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-()4-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F1-20134-0096) _
= FUR Figure column of this table.
?
5.1-81
_. _-. __._._....~ _.
2.13,1.3.1-35
...._ _._ r.
CN TAS-02 97 Rev 1 Fig
._.~...
2.13.1.3.1-35
.....__.._.T.._-.._.`.._..
_._..___._..~
The changes are covered by the EPU LAIR and 50.59 Review Form Section f.A.5 (s-e (Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
^.-,....
to -W3F1-2004
,-0096)
PUR Figure column of this table.
15.1-82 2.13.1.3.1-36 CN-TAS-02-97 V....
Rev 1 Fig 4
2.13.1.3.1-36 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and E 50.59 Review Form Section H.A.5 (i.e.,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4
- specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EF'U dependent on LAR approval) to W3F1-2004,-0096).
PUR Figure column of this table.
15.1-83
-.2.13.1.3.1-37
_._.~..._-~
C,N-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig
__._~..._
_.~_.
2.13.1.3.1-37
.`......__.___ _..__.._.~__..-.
...~.....___... _....~,...__.._..-......_
..~..._
The changes are covered by the EPU LAIR and 50.59 Review Form Section il.A.5 (i.e-(Revised per Attach 1 L7"R-TAS-04-719, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU
, dependent on LAR approval) to W3F1-2004-0096 i PUR Figure column of this table.
15.1-84
.2.13.1.3.1-38 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2.13.1.3,1-38 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and
' 50.59 Review Form Section 11,A.5 (i.e,,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4
` specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) to W3F1-2004-0096)
PUR Figure column of this table.
15.1-85 2.111.11-39
.CN-TAS 02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2.13.1,3.1-39 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and
.-50.59 Review Farm Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on t...AR approval)
_^
to W3Fl-2004-0096)
_.. r
_ ~m..-._ ____
..-. -.. ~.. _.__.. -.......~.- PUR Figure cofumn of this table.
Page 43 of 83 Figure 15.1-87 15.1-88 15.1-89 15.1-90 15.1-94 15.1-97
-20,14-0096) 15.1-93 2.131.3.1-4i U-101-01, Rev. 5 Supporting EPU PUR Figure 2.13,1,3A-40 (Revised per Attach 1 to W3F 1 -2.004-0096) 2,131.11-41 (Revised per Attach 1 to W3171-2004-0096)13
.1.31-42 (Revised per Attach 1 to W3FI-2004-0096) 2,13.1.3,1-43 (Revised per Attach 1 to W3F 1 -2004-0096) 11.1..
11-11.1-..
ZW.1144 (Revised per Attach I to W371-2004-0096) 2,13.1,3,1-45 (Revised per Attach I (Revised per Attach I to W3F 1-2004-(1096).T (Revised per Attach 1 to W3F1 -2004-0096)
Existing FSAR Figure Wq6 Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2.13.1.3A-40 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2,13.1.3.1-41 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev I Fig 2A3.1.11-43 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev4 CN-TAS-02-97 Av I F0 2A&1&144 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 CN-TAS-02-9 Re Rq LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 LTR-TAS-04-11 9, Rev 4 TaWe 3 Affected FEAR Figures Nature of Changes Made to the FSAR The changes are covered by We EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this fable.
CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Q 21 W&
142 The changes am covered by Me EPU LAR and LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 tspecificaily the figures listed in the Supporting EPU UR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section H.A.5 (in.,
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU I dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
e changes are covered by Me EPU LAR and specifically the figures Hod in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes am covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section fl.A,5 (in.,
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR F to W3 F 1-2004-igure column of this table.
15.1-92 2.13,1.3.1-46 AS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2.13.1.3A-46 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and (Revised per Attach 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU j PUR Figure column of this table.
'T~'
--1~i I __.
i-97"Re,
'g
_'2-.'~~.-6,1-47 The changes are covered by Me EPU LAR and LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
CN-TAS 02-97 Rev 1 Fig 2.13.1.3.1-48 fT changes am covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU to W3F 1 -2004-0096)
PUR Figure column of this table.
CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Fig Z 13.1.3.1 -49
. 3,1-49 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and
"(Revised per Attach 1 LTR-I'AS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU to VV3F 1 -2004-0096)
PUR Figure column of this table.
151-96 2.131.3.1-50 CN-TAS-02-97 Rev I Fig 2.13.1.3.1-50
~ The changes am covered Q the EPU LAR and (Revised per Attach I LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU NIA PUR Figure column of this table.
No technical change (Figure number changed) 50.59 Review Category 50.59 Review Form Section ILA.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section H.A.5 (in.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section 11A.5 (r-n dependent on LAR approval) ---- -- -- ------
5159 Review Form Section IVA.5 (jn,,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section fl.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section ll.A.5 (in.,
dependent an LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section II.A,5 (in,,
dependent on LAR approval) 50,59 Review Form Section ILA,5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval)
Page 44 of 83 LI-101-01, Rev. 5 Supporting EPU PUR Figure' Existing YFSAR Figure 15.1-77 Existing FSAR Figure I NIA 15.1-78 Existing FSAR Figure N/A 15.1-79 Existing FSAR Figure NIA
_._.r 15.1-80 Existing FSAR Figure 15,1-81 Lxisting FSAR Figure NIA 15.1-82 15.1-83 WExisting
..FSAR Figure NIA 15.1-84 Existing FSAR Figure NIA 1
5,1-85 NIA Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
CN-TAS-03-23 Rev 1 LTR-TAS-04-'119, Rev 4
_T 2.13.1.3.3-2 1
CN-TAS-03-23 Rev 1 TR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4
..CN-TAS-03-23 Rev 1
....._~
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 2.13.1.3.3-4 CN A 03 23 Rev 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 CN-TAS-03-23 Rev 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4
~.
Table 3 Affected FSAR Figures
~_.-_...
Nature of Changes Made to the FSAR No technical change (Figure number changed) o technical change (Figure number changed) ~.
No technical ^ change (Figure -number changed)
No technical change (Figure number changed)
I Editorial No technical change (Figure number changed)
No technical change (Figure number changed)
No technical change (Figure number changed)
No technicat change (Figure number changed)
No technical change (Figure number changed)
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUP Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and ^ _..
specific:aliy the figures listed in the Supporting EPU The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and ^.._
~......_
No technical change (Figure number changed}~
FUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and
~'
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
50.59 Review Category Editorial Editorial _-
Editorial Editorial Editorial
..~_..-..
....W__ _.___..____._. _
Editorial Editorial....
~
1 -
11111.11.-
50.59 Review Form Section II A.5 (.e.,
dependent on LAIR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section O.A.5^(i.e,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section Il.A.5(Le, dependent on LAR approval)
..-A 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5(i.e,,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section lI.A.5 (i.e_,
dependent can LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
Page 45 of 83 LI-101-01, Rev. 5 50.59 REVIEW FORM Figure No.
15.1-114 Pal-in Supporting CPU PUR Figure 2.13.1.3.3-7 (Revised perAttach 5loW3FI-2004-0096)
NOT IN PUR Affected Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 CIA-TAS-03-23 Rev 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev4 CN-TAS-03-23 Rev I LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 Table 3 FSAR Figures Nature of Changes Madeto the FSAR specifkally Me figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
Figure not in PUR, however, figure plotted from data from calculation CN-TAS-03-23, which is the basis for he related section and figures, and therefore implicit, covered by the EPU LAR.
50.59 Review Category dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section JI.A.5 (Lo, dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 152-1 2,13Z1.3-1 CN-TAS-02-53 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section ILA.5 (i.e.,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table, 1
1-111-112-2
~ Z 112,1.3-2 CN-TAS-02-53 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section 11,A.5 (i.e.,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU
~ dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this tabie.
151-3
..__2.I3.2,1.3-3 CN-TAS-02-53 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR 50.59 Review Form Section 1l.A.5 (i.e.,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
~
151-4 2:132,13-4 CN-TAS-02-53 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and T
50.59 Review Form Section HA.5 {i.e.,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this tabl 152-5 11321.3-5 CN-TAS-02-53 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and
~
..54
.59 Review Form Section
, I I.A'1.115 (i.e.,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table, 15.2-6 2.13.2.1.3-6 CN-TAS-02-53 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i,e,,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed A We Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of 00 table.
15.2-7 2.13,2.1.3-7 CN-TAS-02-53 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section II,A,5 (i.e.,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I
~ specifically the figures listed 0 be Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table, 15.2-8 2.13.2.1.3-8 CN-TAS-02-53 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section II.A,5 (i.e.,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures iisted in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table 15_2-9 2_13.2.1 _3-9 CN-TAS-02-53 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section iI.A.5 (j_e_
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
15.2-10 2.13,2.1.3-10 CN-TAS-02-53 Rev 1 1T"h, changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
Page 46 of 83 LI-101-01, Rev. 5
.__.~__._____..
-Table T
3 Affected FSAR Figures
~..__._ __
...._~__._._.._ ~_.__.
~_
..4~
..~__.
__......T_._.
Figure
.Su_
.-QrtinV.V
...1cPlt
._.~__
Nature of Changes No.
PLJR Figure' Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
Natur to the FSAR
~_
50.59 Review Category
___._...._...._..W__...._
j_TR-TAS-04_30_
., Rev specifically the e figures Ilisted in the Supporting EP d
epe ae n
t on LAR approval)
)
3 FUR Figure column of this tabl e-15,2-11 2112A.3-11
..CN
_.-,.._....n-_...._-..._.,.,
.._^
TAS-02-53 Rev I
-.--_-1.---1.1--...--'-
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 1-specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table.
^
15.2-12 v2.132.1.3-12
¬ CN-TAS-02-53 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and
.50.59
..W..~
Review Form Section fiA5 (i.e.,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
15.2-13
-.2.13.2.1.3-13
...CN-TAS-02-53 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAIR and 50.59 Review Form Section 11.A.5 (i.e,,
LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
132.1.3 CN TAS-02 53 Rev 1
.The
-15
.2-14 changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section IIA.5 LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 E specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table.
15.2-15 2.13.2_2.5-1 (Revised
..CN-TAS-03-3
_ ~.... -. ~.._ _r.._._.,,.._.. ~. _..,_-._, ___ _
Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAIR and
. 50.59 Review Form Section fl.A.5 (Le.,
per LTR-RCPL LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures fisted in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) 120 Rev 1, but not PUR Figure column of this table.
j included in PUR revision of W3F1-2004-0096
~-_......_____.
..___m._.-__._..T
......_-~
15.2-16
..2.13.2.2.5-2 (Revised 3 CN-TAS-03-3 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and
..`
.......____._._~._.__..____
50.59 Review Forma Section 1l.A.5 (i.e.,..~,
per LTR-RCPL LTR-f AS-04-30, Rev 1 i specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) 120 Rev 1, but riot PUR Figure column of this table.
included in PUR revision of W3F1-2004-009Fi)
L
.I 15.2-17 2..13.2.2.5-3 (Revised CN-TAS-03-3 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section fLA.5 (i.e.,
per LTR-RCPL LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) 120 Rev 1, but not PUR Figure column of this table.
included in FUR revision of W3F1-2004-0096) 15,2-18 2.13.2.2.5-4 (Revised..VCN-LAS-03-3 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section dI.A.5 (i.e_
per LTR-RCPL LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) 120 Rev 1, but not PUR Figure column of this table.
included in PUR revision of W3F1-2004-0096) 15.2-15.2-19 2.13.22.5-5 (Revised
..¬.~.,_,.
..._~_,.._
CN-TAS-03-3 Rev 1
_-_._,., T..._,.,.,-_...
.__~_._
...__.~
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section fI.A.5 (Le.,
15.2_
2'i 15.2-22 LWOKOt Rev. 5 Supporting EPU PUR Figure' per LTR-RCPL 120 Rev 1, but not included in FUR revision of W3F I -
2004-0096) 2.132.2,5-6 (Revised per LTI 120 Rev 1, but not included in FUR revision of W3F 1 -
2004-0096) 2.112.25-8 (Revised per Attach 5 to VV3F 1 -2004-0096)
_(Revised per LT R CN-TAS-03-3 Rev I I-TR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 2004-0096) 2.13.2.2.5-7 {Revised CN-TAS-03-3 Revl per LTR-RCPL LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 120 Rev 1, but not included in PUR revision of W3FI-Affected FSAR Figures Nature of Changes Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
Made to the FSAR specifically go figures -listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table.
LTR-TAS-04 80, TRev f 11- -
CN-TAS-03-3 Rev 1 LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 sed CN-TAS-03-3 Rev I i-TR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 CN-TAS-03-3 Rev I LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I 1,
CIA-TAS-03-3 Rev I LITR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 Table 3 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and spedfically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table.
.111, -
1.
The changes are covered-.13y the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The Changes a covered by" Me E--PU LAR aid specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specificky the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting IWPU FUR Figure column of this table The changes 'are covered y the P6 Ck4'anW
~ec!!i~caliKjhe ores
' listed jVthVSWTW"qXTY 50.58 ReYew Category pen Won app ro 50.59 Review Form Section I IA,5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section HA.5 (ie-dependent on LAR approval)
.. 1 111111-..
... "1 11 1 -- ~'
50.59 Review Form Section fl.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) i~
I.."."" ---
11.11.11 11
.11.1...
.. 11111-1-1-111-5019 Review Fwn SecNm HAL O m, dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section iI.A.5 dependent on LAR approval)
.. - ~ --
1-50.59 Review Form Section IIA.5 (i-e,,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Fomi Section H.A.5 (i.e.,
15.2-23 2.13.2.2.5-9 (Rev per LTR-RCPL-0 120 Rev 1, but not included in PUR revision of W3FI-2004-0096) 15,2-24 2.13.2.2,5-10 i
(Revised per LTR-RCPL-04-120 Rev but not included in PUR revision of W3Fl-2004-0096) 15.2-25 213.2.2.5-11 (Revised per LTR-RCPL04020 Rev but no included in PUR revision of W3Fl-2004-0096) 15 2:2 2. 13,2.2.5-12
Page 48 of 83 QUM Rev. 5 PUR Figure' RcPL-o4 1 R
'__Y6'REWi' i,_-
but not included in PUR revision of W3Fl-2004-0096) 213.2.3.1-1 1&535 1 2.13.2.3.1 12 Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
IT"'RIASWOU Rev CN-TAS-02-30 Rev 0 Figure D.1-1 LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I CN-TAS-02-30 Rev Q ' Figure D.1-7 L.TR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 GN-TAS-02-30 Rev
-0 Figure D.1-8 LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 CN-TAS-OZ-30 Rev - 0 Figure D.-I-2 CN-TAS-02-30 Rev 0 Figure D.1-5 I-TR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 CNJAST210 Rev 0 Figure DAB LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 -
11STA&0240 Rev 0 Figure D13 LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I -
CWTAS02-30 Rev 0 Fl um DA12 L-rR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 -
CISTAST530 Rev 0 Figure DJ-15 LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I "
CWTAST030 Rev 0 Figure DJ-16 LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 -
Table 3 Affected FEAR Figures Nature of Changes Made to tt,e FEAR FUR Figure -column this table.
The changes are covered by the EFU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 54,59 Review Form Section HAL (i.e.,
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EFU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and-specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table.
1110TAST220 Rev 0 Figure D14 I The changes am covered by the EPU LAR and
~ 50.59 Review Form Section H.A.5 (i.x, specifically the figures listed in the Supporting PU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
-Me changes are covered by the EFU LAR aW specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by Me EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by Me EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table, 50.59 Review Category dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Secdon HA b 0",
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Sedan HAL (in-,
dependent on t-AR approval)
W9 Rmbw Form SmWn HAL (n.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section IL.5 {in.,
dependent on LAR approval}
50.59 Review Form Sedan H.&5 ( n, dependent on LAR approval) 1111111-1111-....
.. ~ -111- - -
50.59 Review Form Section fl -A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval)
Form Review Form Section HA5 px, dependent on LAR approval) 5019 Review Form Section H.A5 on.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50-59 Review Farm Section TAL j e, dependent on LAR approval)
Page 49 of 83 U-1 0 1 -01, Rev. 5 CN-TAS-0260 Rev 0 Figme DJ -14 Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
CIWAST200 Rev 0 Fl um D19 LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 N-TAS-02-30 Rev 0 Figure D.1-1 1 t TR-TAS-04-30, Rev I CNJAST210 Rev 0 Figure DA13 LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 C N-TAS&530 Rev 0 Figure 0110 LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I CWTAST200 Rev 0 Figure D-1-1 7 LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I CN-TAS-02-30 Rev 0 Figure D.1-18 LI'R-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 CKTAS0260 Rev 0 Quire 0519 LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 CN-TAS-02-30 Rev 0 Figure DA4 LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I CN-TAS-02-30 Rev 0 Figure DJI-7 L.TR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 CNJAST200 Rev D Figure DMA LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I CWTAST200 Rev 0 FWwe 1111-2 LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 CN-TAS-02-30 Rev 0 Figure DAI-5 Table 3 Affected FSAR Figures Nature of Changes Made to the FSAR The changes are cove red by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes am covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed M Me Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table.
7-~h-changes covered -b-by the E- 'P',-U" 'L'-A"-R-a, grad specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes am covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
e changes are covered by he EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures "No 0 Me Supporting EPLJ FUR Figure column of this table The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table.
PUR Figure column of this tabfe.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
50.59 Review Category 50,59 Review Form Section IIAZ On, dependent on LAR approval) 50,59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval)
--0-19--be-A e-w-F-im" 5 O.e,,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section IfA5 Re.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50,59 Review Form Section 11.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review FonTi Serfron lIA5 O.e-T dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Sedbin H.A6 On, dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section IIA5 On, dependent on LAR approval)
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.S (i.e.,
specifically the figures listed 6 We Supporting EPU dependent on L AR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section HA5 On.,
n specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PURFi Figure colum of this table g
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures 90d W the Supporting EPU
!W9 Review Form Section II.A.5 (rn, dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section IIA5 (in, dependent on LAR approval) changes are covered by the EPLI LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section IIA5 (in, 1&542 Z132&140 11043 113211A7
L1-10101, Raw 5 2AW&U22 CN-TAS-02-30 Rev 0 Figure D.11-3 LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I -
2.13,23.1-36 CN-TAS-02-30 Rev 0 Figure D.Ii-4 LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 -
CN-TAS-02-30 Rev 0 Figure D.II-6 LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 -
The changes are covered by he EPU LARnn?
1 5019 Review Form Section H.A.5 {i.e.,
I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting PU I dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this ta ble.
CWTAST240 Rev 0 Figure D.H-12 The changes are covered by the EPLJ LAR and
~ 50.59 Review Form Section H.A.5 (i.e.,
L.TR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table, CWTAST530 Rev 0 Figure [1516 The changes are covered Q Me EPU LAR and LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
_ha e
-- d CNAAS T200 Rev 0 Figure D A06 me c ng s are covere by the EPU LAR and LTR-1 -AS-04-30, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
CNJAST200 Rev 0 Figure DI-9 The changes are, covered by the EPU LAR and LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed 0 Me Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
CN-TAS-02-30 Rev O Figure all-14 I TR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 -
CNAAST200 Rev 0 Figure DJ-11 LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 -
CN-TAS-02-30 Rev 0 Figure ETHA7 CNJAS&260 Rev O Figure 0143 L-TR-TAS-04-30, Rev I -
CWTAST530 Rev 0 Figure DA-I0 LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 -
Tattle 3 Affected FSAR Figures Nature of Changes Made to the FSAR specifically the figures listed A We Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by he EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed h the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table, The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dope d
nt on LAR approval) 1-11..
_9 Review Form Secticin HA5 Ym, dependent on LAR approval) t -
50,59 Rev,~w Form Section 11.&5 OA.,
dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU 50.59 Review Category 50,59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent an LAR approval) 501,9 Review Form Section H A 5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval)
-1..
I'll,
-111111 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on t.AR approval) 50-59 Review
_,w 'Form -Sed`oJ '"HAh 01" dependent on LAR approval)
.59 Review Form Section H.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50,59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent an LAR approval) 50.59 ReOew Form Section ILA,5 (Le.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50159 Review Form Section ILA.5 (W dependent on LAR approval)
LI-10001 Rev. 5 2.13.2.".2-9 2.13.2.3-2-10 Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
CIN-TAS-02-30 Rev 0 Figure 11111-18 LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 CN-TAST530 Rev 0 Figure D=9 LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I CN-TAS-03-3 Rev I LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 CN-TAS-03-3 Rev 1 LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I CN-TAS-03-3 Rev I LTR-TAS-04-3G, Rev 1 LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I CN-TAS-03-3 Rev I I-TR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 CN-TAS-03-3 Rev I LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I 53 Affected FSAR Figures Nature of Changes Made to the FEAR PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes am covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table.
He changes am covered 4 the EPLJ LAFT and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures Usted in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAP, and specifically the figures fisted in the Supporting EPU PUR f=igure column of this table..
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table.
e changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures Ltd in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
50.69 Review Category 50.59 Review f=orm Section II.A.5 (in, dependent on LAR approvaf) 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.w, dependent on LAR approval) 50,59 Review Form Section II.A,5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Revi(-,W Form Section IIA.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section 11,A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section II.A,5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section ll.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 {i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section IIA.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50,59 Review Form Section II.A,5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i
.e dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 15.2-68 2.1 3-2.3.2-4 CN-TAS-03-3 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU UR Ffigure column of this table.
15.2-69 2.13,2.3.2-5 CN-TAS-03-3 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
152-70 2.112,12-6 CN-TAS-03-3 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
15.2-71 2.13.2.3.2-7 CN-TAS-03-3 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
115.2-72 2.13,2~3-
.......2 8 CN-TAS-03-3 Rev 1
15.3-1 LI-101-0 1, Rev
. 5 213,32.1-1
_.13
.3.2
..... W 1-8 CN-TAS-02-98 Rev 0 Figure 7.3.3.2.1-1 LTR-TAS-04-21, Rev 1 CN-TAS-02-98 Rev 0 Figure^ 73.3.21-2 LTR-TAS-04-21, Rev 1 CN-TAS-02-98 Rev 0 Figure 7.3.3.2.1-3 LTR-TAS-04-21, Rev 1 CN-TAS-02-98 Rev 0 Figure 7.3.3.2.1-4 LTR-TAS-04-21, Rev 1 CN-TAS-02-98 Rev 0 Figure 7.3.3.2.1-5 LTR-TAS-04-21, Rev 1 CN-TAS-02-98 Rev 0 Figure 7.3.3.2. 1 -6 LTR-TAS-04-21. Rev 1 CN-TAS-02-98 Rev 0 Figure 7.3,3.2
.1_
7 LTR-TAS-04-21, Rev 1 CN-TAS-02-98 Rev 0 Figure 7.3.3.2.1-8 LTR-TAS-04-21, Rev 1 CN-TAS-02-98 Rev 0 Figure 7.3.3.2.1-9 LTR-TAS-04-21, Rev 1 CN-TAS-03-10 Rev 0 Figure 7.3.3.3.1-1 l
LTR-TAS-04-21, Rev 1 CN-TAS-03-10 Rev 0 Figure 7.3.3.3.1-2........
LTR-TAS-04-21, Rev 1 CN TAS-03 10 Rev 0 Figure 7.3.3.3.1-3 The changes are covered by the EPU LAIR and PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the
.~..._...
~
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this ta b le.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table.
513.59 Review Category m50.59 Review Form Section JIA5 (i-e. J dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section Il.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e-dependent on LAIR approval) 50,59 Review Form Section I
(
dependent on LAR approval, de P 059 Review Form Section
..H
.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50-59
~
Review Form Section. II.A.5 (i.e. -
dependent on LAR approval)
.50.59 Review Form Section~IIA5 (Le_
dependent can LAR approval) 5...._.__..
-viewForm rm Section il A.5 7 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approvai) 50.59 Review Form Section H.A.5 (i.
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section IIAL (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50,5 Review Form Section IIA5 (i.e.,....N dependent can LAR approval) p --------.__.-..._.,------------
50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i_e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting CPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and
^
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR. and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table_
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and.
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
^
The changes are covered by the ^EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU j PUR Figure column of this table.
....~.
The changes are covered.
~
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU Table 3 Affected FSAR Figures Figure No.
Supporting EPU Figure' Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
Nature of Changes PUR Made to the FSAR
'15.2-75 2.13_2_3.2-11
.~
CN-TAS-03-3 Rev 1
^
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and LTR-TAS-04-30, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table,
L=Qt Rev. 5 Table 3 Affected FSAR Figures FQwe SupportinCPU Figure '
Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
Nature of Changes 50.59 Review Category No.
PUR Made to the FSAR
.QTR-TAS-04-21, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
15,3-13 2.13-3,3.1-4 CN-TAS-03-10 Rev 0 Q um TUW4 The chanps am covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Revrew Form Section fl.k5 (i.e.,
I-TR-TAS-04-21, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table, 15.3-14 2.13.3.3.1-5 CN-TAS-03-10 Rev 0 Figure 7.3.3,3.1-5 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i,e,,
LTR-TAS-04-21, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
153-15 2.1113.1-6 CN-TAS-03-10 Rev 0 Figure 7.3.3.3.1-6 The changes am covered Q the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section ll.k5 (i.e.,
LTR-TAS-04-21, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent an LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table 5.3---16 2,13.3.3.1-7 CN-TAS-03-10 Rev 0 Figure T31010 The changes am covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section H.A.5 (i.e.,
LTR-"FAS-04-21, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
15.3-17 2A3,13-1-8 CN-TAS-03-10 Rev 0 Figure 7.3.3.3.1 -8 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section I I.A.5 (i.e_
LTR-TAS-04-21, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table AS is WiI&1-9 CNJAS-0300 Rev 0 Figure TI&3.1-9 The changes" are covered by the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section 11,A.5 Oy~,-
I LTR-TAS-04-21, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table.
15.4-1 Z13AA.1-1 GN-TAS-02-70 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section II.A,5 (i.e.,
LTR-1-AS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
15.4-2 2,13.41.1-2 CN-TAS-02-70 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section ILA.5 (i,e_
LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
,15.4-3 2.13.4,11-8 CN-TAS-02-70 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section ILA.5 (i.e.,
LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table, 154-4 21 3A.1.1 -3 CN-TAS-02-7D Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPLJ LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section.A
.5 (i.e.,
LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
15.4-5 213.4.11-4 CN-TAS-02-70 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section ILA,5 (i.e.,
LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table 5,4-6 2.13.4.1_._.1-5 Rev im The changes am covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Farm Section 1.~~
O.e LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
-~U-pp Figure rting EPU No.
PUR Figure' 15A-7 15A-8 15A-9 LMOVOt Rev. 5 2004-0096)
Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
CNAAS02JO Rev I LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 CWTAS4124 Q, I
LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 CN-TASW70 Rev I LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 CN-TAS-02-70 Rev I LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 CN-TAS-02-70 Rev I LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 CN-TAS-02-70 Rev I LTR-1 AS-04-28, Rev 1 CN-TAS - 6270 Rev I LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev I Table 3 Affected FSAR Figures Nature of Changes Made to the FSAR FOR Figure columno f this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered b y the EFU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by Me EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed 5 the Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU 50.59 Review Category 50.59 Review Form Section H.A.5 "e.,
dependent on LAR approval}
50.59 Review Form Section il.A.5 {i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval}
50.59 Review Form Section H.A.5 to, dependent on LAR approval}
iiev iew Form Section II.A.5 (i,o, dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section 11,A.5 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table, CN-TAS-02-70 Rev I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR wid
~ 50.59 Review Faun Section (i.e.,
LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev I specifically the figures 150d A he Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPLJ PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table.
50,59 Review Form Section HAT on, dependent on LAR approval) 50,59 Review Form S action W&5 (in.,
dependent on I.AR approval) 2.13.4,1,2-6 CN-TAS-02-70 Rev The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section H.A.5 (i.e LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on I-AR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
CN-TAS-02-70 Rev 1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 {i.e.,
S-04-28, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR appmvai)
PUR Figure column of this table.
15A-17 2.13.4.1,3-1 (Hevised CN-TAS-02-95 Rev 0 Figure 7.3.4.1.11
'he cAngnes am covered by he EPU LAR and 50,59 Review Form Section HIS "0" per LTR-RCPL TR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) 120 Rev 1, but not PUR Ffigure column of this table included in PUR revision of W3171-
Page 55 of 83 15.4- _
. 23
'15.4-24 15.4-25 LI-101-01, Rev. 5 Supporting EPU PUR Figure r 2.13.4.1.3-2 (Revised per LTR-RCPL 120 Rev 1, but not included in PUR revision of W3F1-2004-0096) 2.13.4.1. -3. _ 5 (Revised per Attach 5 to W3F1-20114-0096) 2.13.4.
1 3=6 (Revised per LTR-RCPL 120 Rev 1, but not included in PUR revision of W3F1-2004-0096) 2.13.4,1,3-7
._ ~._
(Revised per Attach 5 Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
CN-TAS-02-95 Rev 0 Figure 7.3.4.1.3-2.. _
T'R-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 2004-0096) 2.13.4.1.3-3-..-_....._
CN-TAS-02-95 Rev 0 -.Figure 7.3.4.1.3-3 (Revised per Attach 5 LTR-TA5-04-28, Rev 1 to W3171-2004-0096) 2.13.4.1-3-4 (Revised CN TAS-02-95 Rev 0 Figure 7.3.4.1.3-4 per LTR-RCPL LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 120 Rev 1, but not included in PUR revision of VV3F1-CN-TAS-02-95 Rev 0 Figure 7.3.4.^1,3-5 II_TR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 CN-TAS-02-_95 Rev O Figure ure
._7
.3__
.4
.'1
.3fi LTR-TA5-04-28. Rev 1 C: -TAS-£12-95 Rev O
Figure 7
....._-1 __
,.~.437 t.TR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 to W3F1-2004-0096) 1 2.13.4.1.3-8 (Revised CN-TAS-02-95 Rev 0 Figure 7.3.4.1.3-8 per LTR-RCPL LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 120 Rev 1, but not included in PUR revisions of W3F1-i 2004-0096) 2.13.4.1.3-9 (Revised per LTR-RCPL 120 Rev 1, but not included in PUR revision of W3F1-2004-0096)
...CN-TAS-02-95 Rev 0 Figure 7.3.4.1.3-9 t-TR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 50_59 REVIEW FORM Table 3 Affected FSAR Figures Nature of Changes Made to the FSAR The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
~~ _._.-...
... t
~
._ r_
The changes are covered by e EPU LAR a specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting PtJ PUR Figure column of this table.
They changes are covered by the EPU LAR and ~~...
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table, Y
The changes are covered by the EPU ^ LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table 50.59 Review Category 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 50.59 Review Form Section iI.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 59 Revs ' ew Se
_Fo
... "rm.S_
ction ILA_"5
.(
i.e.~
50-dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section V II.A.6 (i.e-dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section fl.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5^.(i.e
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form. Section hl.A.5^(i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval)
V 50.59 Review Form Section Ii.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval)
W3F1-2004-0096) 15.4-29 1, 213.4.13-13 (Revised per LTR-RCPL04A20 Rev 1, but not included in PUR revision of LM0101 Rev. 5 W3F1-2004-0096) 2-13-4.1.3-11 (Revised per LTR-RCPL-04-120 Rev 1, but not included in FUR revision of I W3171-2004-0096) 2,13.4.1,3-12 (Revised per LTR-RCPL&4020 Rev 1, but not included iii PUR revision of W3F1-2004-0096) 213.4.1X1 LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev I LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 SUartlnED" FIrW Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
PUR Figure 213.41.3-10 CNwTAS-02-95 Rev 0 Que 73.4.1.3-10 (Revised per LTR-LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev I RCPL&4q2O Rev 1, but not included in PUR revision of CN-TAS-02-95 Rev -O Figure 7.3.4.1.3-11 LI -R-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 CNJAST205 Rev a Figure 7.3.4.1.3-12 LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev I NOT IN CALC LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 CN-TAS-02-92 Rev 0 App D Figure D-2 CN-TAS-02-92 Rev 0 App D Figure D-1 LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 CN-TAST202 Rev
...O.A D Figure DO Table 3 Affected FSAR Figures Nature of Changes Made to the FSAR The changes are covered by th-e -E-P U- -L A-Va" and-.- _-_
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes am covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
He changes am covered by Me EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
CN-TAS-02-92 Rev 0 App D Que DA The changes are covered by Me EPU LAR and LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU J.PYR Figure column of this table.
CN-TAST2-92 Rev 0 App 0 Figure DO The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table..
The changes am covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table,
'Me changes am covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed 0 he SppWing EPU PUR Figure column of this table, 50.59 Review Category 50.59 Review Form Section II.A,5 Om, dependent on LAR approval) 5019 Review Form Section HAZ (iX, dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e ;,
dependent on [
...AR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval)
........ --- ------ --.1 -
~ ------
50,59 Review Form Section If.A.5 (La, dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section ILA,5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50,59 Review Form Section 1I.A.5 (Le,,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section 1I.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section h.A.5 (j.e.,
dependent on LAR approval)
Figure No.
15.4-35 15-4-36 ~~ i 15.4-37 15.4-38 15.4-40 15.4-41 ^..
15.4-43
^~
15.4-4 LI-101-01, Rev. 5 Supporting EPU PUR Figure 2.13.4.1.4-7 2.13.4.'¬.4-5
.2
.13.4.1.4-8 ~_
2_ 13.4.1.4-9 Deleted Defeted Deleted Deleted Original Figure 15.4-98 was changed to 15.4-44 Original Figure 15.4-99 was changed to 2.13.4.3.2-2~
(Revised per Attach 5 to W3F1-2004-0096)
Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
CN-TAS-02-92 Rev 0 App D Figure D-$
LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1
^CN-TAS-02-92 Rev
^0 App D Figure D-7 LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 CN-TAS-02-92 Rev 0 App D Figure D-8 LTR-TAS-t14-28, Rev 1 CN-TAS-02-92 Rev 0 App D Figure D-9 LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 C
-TAS-02-92 Rev ^C#
LTR7TAS-04 2_8, Rev
^1 CN-TAS-02-92 Rev 0 LTR TAS-(14-28, Rev 1 CN-TAS-02 9 2 Rev 0 LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1
_.CN TAS-02-92 Rev 0 T LTR-1 -AS-04-28, Rev 1 CN-TAS-02-92 Rev 0 LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 NIA CN-TAS-03-8 Rev 3_.._.
LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 A5-03-8 Rev 3_._
LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1
.2.13_4.3.2-_3
-FCN-TAS-03-$ Rev g Table 3 Affected FEAR Figures N
ature of Changes__
Made to the FSAR he changes are covered by. the EPU LAR and pecifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column o f this table.
The changes are covered by them_ EPU LAR and..~._...
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figu re column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU FUR
, Figure column of th is table.
........ ^~ _____..
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and i specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU
~ FUR Figure column of this table.
With the new analysis for section 15.4 there were less figures than with the original analysis.
With the new analysis for section 15.4 there were less figures than with the original analysis With the new analysis for section 15.4 there were less figures than with the original analysis.
With the new analysis for section 15.4 there were less figures than with the original analysis.
With the new analysis for section 15.4 there were less figures than with the original analysis.
Only editorial changes to this figure change to a~
figure number).
Only editorial changes to this figure (i.e., change to a figure number).
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The
^changes are covered mhby
- t..__.
. ~._._..._
specifically ufigures listed in the Supporting i=PU the 9 PUR Figure column of this table The changes are covered by by the EPU LAR and specificatly the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval) 50.5.9 Review Form Section 11,A,5 (Le-,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Re-view Form SectionII.A.5V (
Le.,,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section ILA.5 (i.e.,,
dependent on LAIR approval) oial
._ _~. _
~__...
50,59 Review Category 50.59 Review Form Section il
.5 (i.
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section 11
.5 (i.
dependent on LAR approval)
_~ _____....._-....
__.~..
50.59 Review Form Section I
- AI
.5 (.
dependent on LAR approval) 50.69 Review Form Section fI.A.5 i.e..
dependent on LAIR approval) 50.59 Review Form
.Section 4 ILA.5 (i.e.,
dependent on L AR approval) 50.59 Rev ew Form Sec
.-ton II-A
.5 (i.e.,
50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 V(Le.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 5(7.59 Review. Form Section -II.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval)
LI-101-01, Rev. 5 PUR Figure LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 CN-TAS-03-8 ^Rev.^
..~.._.._
..._._...._...._.~_
3 LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1
_.~._~.
Wv 2.13_4.3,2-5
~CN-TAS-03-8 Re 3
LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 CN-TAS-03-8 Rev 3 LI R-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 CN-TAS-03-8 Rev 3 2.13.4.3.2-7 (Revised per W3F1-20040073) 93.4.3.2_
(Revised per W3F1-2004-0073) 2.13.4.3.2-9 (Revised ~
per W3F1-2004-0073)1
.~
2.13,4.3.2-10 (Revised per W3F1-2004-0073) 2,13A.32-11 (Revised per W3F1-2004-0073) 15A-57 3 2.13.4.3.2-12 (Revised per Attach 5 to W3F1-2004-0096)
Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
Table 3 Nature of Changes Made to the FSAR 50.59 Review Category PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered -. by the EPU LAR and..
.. W.v.
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAIR and j 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figu re column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figu re column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section l 1.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on L.AR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section IIA5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) y 9 Review Form Section II.A.5(i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section ILA.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval)
.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAIR approval) 513.59 Review Fgrm Section ILA.S (i,e dependent on t_AR approval) 5 ¬3.59 Review Form Section II.A.6 (Le.,
dependent on LAR approval)
~n 9 Review Form Sectio ILA.5 (i.e dependent on LAIR approval) 5 ¬3.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section IIA5V (i.e.,
dependent on LAIR approval) 50.59) Review Form Section Ii.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval)
LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed to the Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table.
CN-TAS-03-8 Rev 3 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU E PUP Figure column of this table.
e.-...-_
CN TAS-03-8 Rev 3 The 1-specifically changes are covered by the EPU LAR and LTR TAS-04-28, Rev 1 the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column o f this table.
CN-TAS-03-8 Rev 3 The changes are covered by the f=PU LAR and LTR-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
C1 -TAS-03-8VRev_3
._~____ _~
.._^
.^
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and L
-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table.
CN-TAS-03-8
_m...
Rev 3 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and -...
L -f"R-TAS-04-28, Rev 1 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table.
CN-TAS-02-41 Rev 0 Figure 7.3.8.3.1-1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAIR and LTR-TAS-04-22, Rev 2 specifically the figures fisted in the Supporting EPU
! t'UR Figu re column of this table.
CN-TAS-02-41 ^Rev 0 Figure 7.3.6.3.'1-2 The changes are covered by the~EPU LAR and LTR-TAS-04-22, Rev 2 j specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
CN-TAS-02-41
~.~
Rev 0 Figure 7.3.6.3.1-3 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and LTR-TAS-04-22, Rev 2 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
OJmCt~>5
.. ~.
. ~ ~..
~ ~
m/§
~~%d~AR ~gJ~
~~ e/ ~
p~ q~ E~ -~~~\\~ / ~/\\ cmA~ _moAm~ #@~~ ~
~
~~~. /um
_~. ~
@ ~ a~ ~~
/m
~_
RA@_ ~ /~
N~
~
k F6me m~_e& met AR
- ~
,\\// ~.~ /$\\9 ~ ~
~ Cm~\\J&>>~
~
y0~ \\e7+/-~ d4
~\\<<~ k<<ae mmmd& met U(~ md~~~~~ \\/~~~
A~ dm \\/~:
~R4~~ %% ~v2 a<<~ a9 meGur G!W b bes9~~ gE~
+<<<<m!m UR9~
a§ PuRF_%De~ u_ y G_s %~~
S: (~ s~\\/~ - ~ ~~_~ ~
~
~ ~~ 4~~ /o dua722: ~
~ ~
~ e kqm // mm\\\\ Q!+\\PUS /\\<<
~~03~ e \\&F~ ~ St ~
- ~
Q\\
~ w~ w~ 2% ~v2 9~ wm&me+ums~dk Ash Su9~~ ~
U k9<<e# m~ Ra<<r q
~>>\\/~
e m~,n ~
j QBy
,&ee
.~~ ~
. ~~
z~aaw~+/-
~
. ~
. ~~~ ~ ~.
~
~
CN7Awg4~~ v0egum za£$~$
~ ~.
~
~
e +aqm ae mmmd #th EPU Rad
. ~~..
~0 m ~ v >~ A ~ Qm %%5 @:
\\~
~ +/-~ Sma%~v2 m~ em& meWu~ ~wke~R s+~$q~
U
&Wdmlm~ Rip Rg PURF)um~ umn a %& %bw
~
/7~ /~ m\\:~~~~~~ ~~ y~%>>Ra\\ege~ \\m\\SZ
~\\c m<<\\m m+\\\\~ k ~
//m/~~~~ /m\\~~/\\m~~
n~~~\\
~ W~ ym%%~v2 a<<cam m&~h W;r Glkb~h ~ <<0 9EPU
+WWe% m~ Ra<<~ q
.. ~..
~~.
~..
~~.
. ~~~ ~ /~ /~~ mG~~ G~ +y ~~~. _~.
..... ~~..
4Eee z~sw$4$
CNe&y~ 4~~voF)ua 2IEZl$
~emaq<<am mmr ~ met U~ Rad m.m~v w~~ ~ amn~ SKw
~lw~ y~ 9% ~ v2
+e~ a9 me Gumans dM %esu?~ q EPU de<<kem m ~
R 7~ v
)
, POR E%ue mbmnM %K %mE 4/6- ~ ~ :~
~ ~
~
a; ~
~~~N/\\yam
~
6 \\/v im \\e2aw\\~$
\\k Gm7\\<<~ m//d
~
~
y k \\P ~ ~
~
\\/~ ~
~(em ~ dm~ /~
\\ )
LT+/-~ y<<a%~v2 m~ ym%!G Gur G!k M bes9p%GEPU ~+~
mew m~
Ra+r q
_ ~ ~
~ ~.
~
. ~
.~~ ~.
. _~~
~
. ~.
f// ~~ ~ ~ /~ : ~ ~ a E ~~~ ~ ~~~\\..
~
~ ~ ~.
.. ~..
\\
~s: m z~*Ea:l cm~ SmgSR<<~
Tk magGae mama& me~U~Rak
~+.m~~ >>~ r~
do,~ks¢G
{~ v ~ moral!#h4 ~ ~ ~
S~ d W,~,4 spc~ m& mewgu~ ~yk m mesu<<omgEPU d7mk4 m~
R 7~ ~
% haw vm6mm)
PURF%Ra m~~ n& b& m~~
~
s g ~ j$\\3 ~ ~
~
~
~~ ~
~
~ ~~~.
~
~
ym/\\~v~~
/b~ ~ q<<~ ~
m~ /\\~ e j\\{/R m~~~ ~~ /m ~~ _~ q am \\/~ :
/
me +d~rA!!<<h4 ~ R2~- g!%Rm4
~m~ +m& me&u~ ns uh~h Sm~$9~ U
+&We% m~ Ra<<~
m) b aaw~
!40 $mG
~~ R~gum~ umna m& bmm S:
w~
~~~
- 2. +/-~ -~
/~~ s3\\S ~
/~~~~~~~~~~~h/Wm<<~ e~
~
~
v /d Sk jL~ \\k~ ~o\\\\~~ war \\~i r<<~ w, y~ +d<<rte ~h4 ~ m~ ygJ~K~,4 s<<cam m&~b Qer ~kk A mes;+o~ gEPU u~eWemon~ R+p Rq b waH &m6mm}
RURF%ue~ u~ << Gmb~l i/s/a ~ Same ~~~~ \\~~ wm%S~}7 ~~~~~~~~~ ~hn~\\e/mm\\d~k~U~R>>d~~~ ~
m \\\\v~~A~ ym~ : i
(~ v k~rA <<h4 ~ mT4S~ 2q,~v4
+ec q6 meGur ~Qk A meSu+~~gEPU
+#6em m~ RaP~ qi b waG %~ tmm}
PURF)ue mlumma mG %we
~ E Q~ 2~ w\\j4~~~~ ~~/ymj5~v~ ~~~ ~
~ /n~
~~~
e m\\/& /~ §~ \\Rmd~~~~~~~ v
~~ A\\~~ //~i,
(~ v + <<rte +h4 ~ ~~ S~ d~K ~v4
~+~ +6yme+uesl2Q m mesm~4~ EPU d<<mae* m~ RaP~ v b waw Jmtmm)
PURFguec umn¥ Ga%ae
~5:
js 2 ~ ~
~ /~ ~ ~
~ ~
- \\yo j~
~~~ ~ ~~
<< \\~~
}~
~
~
mm~ ~
e mu
\\ <<~ ~
~
/\\R aU~ ~~
9 ~ v
>> ~ r ~
mm \\<<~ ~
\\
{~v k <<rA <<h4 ~
~~ ymJ~% ~v4 a<<~ a6 mekum>>Ikk Mph su9~ m ~
u
+aWe* m~ R~~
>>)
~ :~©\\/~~4/m6..~ ~~.~~~~.
\\/~Fi m~ _n~~ mom§
Page 613 of 83 LI-101-01, Rev. 5 Supporting PU PUR Figure' 2.13.6.3.2-6 (Revised per Attach 4 to W3FI-2004-0096) 2.13.6.32-7 CN-TAS-03-15 Rev 1 (Revised per Attach 4 Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
~
CN-TAS-03-15 Rev 1 LTR-TAS-04-113, Rev 4 to W3F1-2004-0096)
..._._.....CN 5
2.13.6.3.2-g TAS-03-1 Rev T
per Attach 4 L.R-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 (Revised to W3F1-2004-0096)
...~_.........._._._....~....
2.13.6.3.2-9
-TAS-03-15 Rev (Revised per Attach 4 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 to W3F1-2004-11096) 13 6.3 0
CN-TAS 63-15 Rev 1 (Revised P r Attach TR-TAS-04 4
-1134 e
L Rev to W3F1-2004-0096) 2
.13.6.3.2-1 (Revised per Attach 4 to W3F1-2004-0096) 2.13.6,3.2-1__
2 to W3171 -2004-0096)
Deleted ~.__
CN-TAS-03-15 Rev 1 LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 0
5 Re LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 CN-TAS-03-15 Rev LTR-TAS-04-22, Rev 2 CN-TAS-03-15 Rev 1.....T L.TR-TAS-04-22, Rev 2 CN-TAS-03-15 Rev 1 LTR-TAS-04-22, Rev 2 CN-TAS-03-15 Rev 1..__-
LTR-TAS-04-22, Rev 2 TA 0 5 Re 1 LTR-TAS-04-22, Rev 2
_CN-TAS-
.-03 1
.5 Rev 1 LTR-TAS-04-22, Rev 2 CN-TAS-03-15 Rev 1
_. Table 3 Affected FSAR Figures
. _ ~~
..~..__..
Nature of Changes Made to the FSAR The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and
_m....-
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes arecovered by the EPULAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
e changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section ILA.5 (i.e-specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAIR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
^The changes are covered by the EPU LAR-and ~.
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EP-U LAIR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table.
With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were loss figures than with the original analysis.
With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were loss figures than with the original analysis.
..~._..,.
With he new analysis for section 15,6 there were less figures than with the original analysis.
With the new analysis-for section 1-5.6 there were less figures than with the original analysis, With the new analysis for section 1-5.6 there were less T figures than with the original analysis.
With the new analysis for section 15.6 -there-were less figures than with the original analysis.
With the new analysis for section 1-5.6 there were fess 50.59 Review Category 50.59 Review Farm Section ILA.5 (i.e.,,
dependent on LAR approval) 50,59 Review Form Section IP.A.5 dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.S (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50,59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section H.A.5 dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section f.A.5 (i
.e dependent on LAIR approval) 50.59 Review Farm Section ILA.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Forni Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval)
~~..50.59 -Review Form -Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on L.AR approval) 511.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (Le.^,.
dependent on LAR approval)
V 50.59 Review Form Sectionif.A.5 (i.e-dependent on LAIR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (Le.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section ILA.s(f.e.,
5-6-33 Previously Deleted
._._.._...._-...... _.~ ____
5,6-34 Previously Deleted U-101-01, Rev. 5 Previously Deleted reviousty Deleted 2.12-1~
~"_-...... ~ _.
Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
LTR-TAS-04-22, Rev 2 CN-TAS-03-15 Rev 1.
LTR-TAS-04-22, Rev 2 C_
N
-TAS-03-15 Rev 1 e
NIA NIA N/A N/A ON-OA-02-58 Rev.._
0 APP
..._B Fig 15.6-36 CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 APP g
.Fig
...1_5
.6" 37 CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App B Fig 15.6-38 CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App B Fig 15.6-39 C.-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App B
...Fig 15.6-40.
CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App L3 Fig 15..6-42 W.
Table 3 Affected FSAR Figures Nature of Changes Made to the FSAR figures than with the original analysis.
With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less figures than with the original analysis.
'T With the ^ new analysis for section 15.6 there were less figures than with the original analysis.
NIA NIA N/A T N/A The changes are covered by the EPU^ LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and
...~
specifically the figures fisted in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
~W The changes area covered by theW EPU~LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR f=igure column of this table.
changes covered are y he P AR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and -
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App B Fig 15.6-41 I The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU
¬ PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes
.... ~..
.s are covered
an d
specifically the figures listed to the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App B Fig 15.6-43 The changes are covered by the EPU L.AR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU - LAR and -_
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
50.59 Review Category vdependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Fond Section II.A.5 (f.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval).
N/A 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.54 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section 11.A.5 ( ¬.e.,~
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 -Review Form Section f.A.5 (l.e.,~
dependent on L_AR approval)
.-50.59.. Review Form Section II.A,5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section H.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval)
.50,59~Review Form Section IIA.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form ^ Section ILA.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section ILA.5-(Le,,..
dependent on LAR approval)
~y50.59 Review Form ^ Section II.A.5 (i.e,,
dependent on LAR approval)
Page 62 of 83 Figure No.
15.6-45 15,6-46 15.6-47 15.6-48 15.6-49 15.6-50 1 2.12-15 15.6-51 2.12-16 15.6-52 15.6-53 Affected FSAR Figures Supporting EPU Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
Nature of Changes PU R Figure' Made to the FSAR 2.12-10 CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App B Fig 15.6-45 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU 2.12-12 2.12-17
,12-18 15,6-54 Ti,1,-2---l
- 2.'i ---- --------- -
1,5151 12-20 15.6- --------- 1-2.12-2 OW10t Rev. 5 CN-QAOW58 Rev 0 App
.B Fig 15A46 CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 Ape B Fig 15.6-47 CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App B Fig 15.6-48 CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App 8 Fig 15.6-49 CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App B Fig 15.6-50
~"-"O
-... A,--02-58 Rev &App B g 5.6 51
-0208 Rev 0 App B Fig 15.6-52 CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App B Fig 15.6-53 Tabb 3 PUR Figure column of this tab le.
The changes are covered by the LAR and specifically the figures listed h he Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU R Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting FPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
changes am covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EFU LAR and specMcally the figures listed in he Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU t AR and specifically the figures listed W the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App B Fig 15,6-54 The, changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures 90d in we Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
CIA-¬)A-Q2-58 Rev 0 App B Fig 15.6-55 The changes are covered by the EPU t.AR and specifically the figures Ated 0 Me Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
CN-OAT558 Rev 0 App B Fig 15.6-56 The changes are covered by he EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting FPU FUR Figure column of this table.
CN-QA0208 Rev 0 App B Q 11057 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Category 50.59 Review Form Section H,A.5 {i.e.,
dependent on LAP approval) 50.59 Review Form Section HAI {in, dependent on LAR approval) 50.59-Review 'Formc on dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section 11,A,5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section flAb (im, dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section ll.k5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50,59 Review Form Sedbn HAI (im, dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section HAI Om, dependent an LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section UAI (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section 11A.5 (i,e,,
dependent on LAR approval)
--.111.111-11 50.59 Review Form Section HAI (i,e,,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section HAI Qw, dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section ILAI (i.e.,
Page 63 of 83 LI-101-01, Rev. 5 Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
.N OA-2=.5.~4 C
Q8 QRev 0 App B Fig 15.6-5 8 CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App B Fig 15.6-59
.~
Table 3 Affected FSAR Figures ature of Changes Made to the FSAR specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table.
~
The changes are covered by the EPULAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR, Figure column of this table. W-W.
_....~ __.._..._..
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and
.-5Q.59 Review Form Section 91A.5 (i.e.,
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
^
...m 50.59 Review Category
..dependent t~on~LAR approval)_
_.._~
50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval)
_... ~
.. ~_._-.__ N CN-OA-02-58Rev 0 App B Fig 15.6-60 The changes are coveredby the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
specifically the figures fisted in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table
. ~.._. ~ m C
-CA--2=S8 0
Rev 0AppB Fig 156-61 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR ^ and
..50
^
-59 Review Form Sectionl1.A.5 (i.e.,
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
(;N-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App B Fig 15.6-62 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section fI.A.5 (l.e_
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
CN-OA-02-58 Rev g App B
_ Fig 15 6
63 The changes are covered by. the E-PU LAR and..
50.59 Review Form Section ILA..5 (i.e.,
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
I, FUR Figure column of this table C
.N-OA-02-58 8 Rev 0 App B Fig 15.6-64 T
The changes are covered by them EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
CN-OA-02-58 Rev Cl App B Fig 6
15_T-65 T..T The changes are covered by. the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent or) LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
CN O 02 58 Rev 0 App B Fig 15.6-66 The changes are covered by the. EPU LAR and
. 50.59 Review Form Section iI.A.5 (i.e-specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table.
CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App B Fig 15.6-67 7
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and--__
50.59 Review Form Section ^ILA.5 (Le-specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
(.N-OA-02-a8 Rev 0 App 6 Fig 15.6-68 T..
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section lf.A.5 ^(Le., V specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table -.
T CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App B. Fig 15.6-69 J
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i
.e specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
Figure No.
15.6-70 15.6-71 15.6-72 15.6-73 15.6-74 15.6-7 15 15.6-76 15.6-
.77.....
15 78 1 Previously Deleted 15.6-79 115.6-84 15,6-84 15,6-85 15.6-86 _
15,6-87 15.6-88.
15.6-..89 15.6-93 0, 5,6-94 LI-1 ¬11-01, Rev. 5 Supporting EPU PUR Figure 2.12-35 ~~.
PUR Table
_.,G
-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App B Fig 15.5-71 Previously Deleted Previously Deleted Previously Deleted Previously Deleted Previously Deleted Previously Deleted Previously Deleted Previousfy Deleted 15.6-81 i
Previously. Deleted Previously Deleted Previously Deleted 15.6-91 Previousfy Deleted 15.5-92 Deleted Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
_.CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 App B Fig 15.6-7(} ^_
N/A NIA N/A
-NIA NIA 15.6-82 Previously Deleted NIA 15,6-8 3 Previously Deleted N/A
"`
Previously Deleted NfA W._
^,Previously Deleted NIA Previously Deleted NIA 15.6-90 I Previously Deleted NlA Deleted N/A Affected FSAR Figures Nature of Changes Made to the FSAR able 3 UR Figure column of this table.
.The changes are covered bythe EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are. covered by the t:PU LAR and T specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of thi s table N/A N/A N/A J NIA
~~
N/A-N/A NIA NIA 1 NIA N/A NIA-_
N/A 50.59 Review Form Section (e,
dependent on LAR approval)
L IA.S 5 ¬3.59 Review Form Section (i.e.,
dependent on L.AR approval)
NIA NIA
- NfA__
. _..W NIA 50.59 Review Farm Section II_A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 5Q
....59 Review Form Section 11.A.5^ (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) m 50.59 Review Form Section H.A.5(i.e.,,
CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0
With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less figures than with the original analysis.
( CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were Iess figures than with the original analysis.
~
CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less
LdW@t~ws
. _~.. ~~ ~~~. ~
. ~ ~
~
~
~. ~
_~~ ~~~
.~.
.~~
~
. ~... ~. ~ ~~....
~ ~
A
~ @d ~
ARFUu~s mpm~~~Aown~
.~~~~~~m@~ ~an~s
~
R mgme
~-.~~~~~gCm~ml~ mom\\\\A~~
¥~ e & me ~ ~R
~om~va~@pR
. ~ %~~~ ~~I~~~~~ags~~~ ~~~-~edy~~\\%~/~i~~~~
S: ~
~~~
~ U~~~~
~ ~\\~~ m~ v
~
~
~~~~ ~~ \\\\~
\\nom sir <<+n ~ $m/wr aw /Emu v \\~r~ km \\/~(.~
+ues~b nw h_me <<gi ~aR~y k de#dmlm ~ Ra<<~ q
!\\\\ _
~
m ~~
~ ~ ~~
~
+ed
~
~ ~~~
cy~ \\~ /§n \\
/mln + +\\ m~ s ~ m+/-m1 Bm+/-/w~ ~
a ~ /~ v w~ A ~ a\\~!: ~ G,
`>>gur banwhme~%m~aG~y&
d7mdmlm ~R7p ~}
4~-7~ ~ +~~~~~~ ~~~- //~}\\
~~~~~~~ ~ m\\/m>a~~s~~ 3mj5a\\//~ m~
& ¢q~~w~~ ~Gm \\%~ G\\
<<umslGn~ h!~ _#Rlaa~y y
+&We% m ~ R +~
~_)
]s: \\a~~ ~~d~~~~~ ~ ~\\~~\\ate ~ ~~~~~~~~~ Amt mw m~~
o_
r~ \\m~/Bee/m~e~~\\mRmi (~~ y+dUS§:
- +ur mm whmeo§m~am~y&
d+mamlm~ RaR~ v}
~ ~
@~
~~. ~
~ k~~
~ ~o~a-
~ ~~~~~
Rm~
~
\\ $~ e a~\\~ \\r &+n o m\\/_r ash /(~/~~ >> \\<<W~~ ~i
/
&umsmm ~ bbe <<%nma~ y y aAke9 m EARaR~ u
~~ d m o~ \\d~~~~~~ ~%~
~ ~~~
~
3~ \\R<</~~
W m \\\\nw m~\\se mwm~.~ ///~ ~ s~/\\m~v \\~ m~ d\\~~ 3~
~+u~ ~an~h~b oWaman~y&
~d~ mamlm~R+KGg}
g: ~\\
~ ~ ~
~ U~~~
~ ~~
~~2-\\(q~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~i~~ ew >>\\ate e~ +~ \\at m w mi e ~ m~ v /~~ ~ dm \\/§Km\\
<<uaamm ~hme~&nlmas.
+WWemen~ Ra>>r q
~s:~
~~~~d~~~~~/moo\\3\\a~vo~~~~~~~~~,Amt mem~s~r a\\\\~~~m~\\@e~ \\\\~v>>~~/~~~&~~;
~<<ue&mm ~
hmeoq~m~aq~w<<
dAmdmlm ~ R +~ v
~:\\m~
~/d~~.~~\\\\~~- \\B~/o~~~~~~~~~~ ~lh~ \\~~ a~~~ km\\%~ke _~ a/~~g~v/~A~ am \\&~:
...~~~~~.~~.~~~
\\~~ \\mw\\\\e~/~a~~I ~._
..,+#<<eMm~\\+/dq S: 4~ ~ +~
~~~~
CN~ ~~2aa~vo
~
\\~F ne a~ y
\\\\rmgm~ B\\ee_edms ~ m\\~ ~~ r \\ei //\\%\\
~Wu~ ~hn~h~F oWi ~ma~y<<
d~ mamlmL<<R<<~ qQ
}~
mm
\\~\\d~~~ ~~~~/+/-~ q~ vo~ ~~ ~ ~~~Am~ +wm~s~ mWmls~ <<\\w\\W~ \\\\m~ ~w~/m\\~ \\d\\&5K~\\
+umam+ ~Bme~%nm m~~.
+&Wemon~ Ra<<_q
~s: m\\
~~~
~
~ +~
CN- ~~ 3a~ vo
. ~. ~~.~. ~ ~_
Am menu aG~y G %rmam,%B\\e w~ ~
9.
.~ ~
~~~ ~
~,~.
+.m ~ Cew~ r s dm n: 5%~.
Gumsmm ~
h!k o+~
lam~y <<
dew km~m ~
R +p v
}
~
s mZ ~
~ ~
~
Rd~~. ~
~~>>~ \\e\\<<~~~~~~~~ ~~ <<~ mt m~ ma~~ +~ n
\\~ <<w ~
m~ &~~
\\~v /~ A/<<kn~ /)+/-,
~<<uaamm w hmea §n2 ma a<<
~ +#<<eM m L%Ra<<~ m)
~EG :m.~.~..~....
D~ and CND ~~ ae~ v0
~..~.~~..~~.~~~~...~~~~.~~~~~~_~.~~.~.
Am menu matey & mr&~ i ~Eebee~ m~
\\ \\~ m~ \\~ 7 \\~ \\d~ 3 K~
Wuaslbn_whme<<%G~ ma~y<<
_~d<<mamlm~ R7~ m§
,~ 2 mg
~~~
o \\k~~
\\~~ ~&- /q R<<~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ /A\\
%~ /w m~ %~ ~ wont ~ Gm ~ m is ~ a 9~v _~\\mom dm~ \\~ G,
~k;m.m_anwh~h oWbm ma_~y&
&&We%on~ R+te a§_
~
6 9 /
~~~ ~
~
O~ %~
~
~ ~~
~~~
~
/~o~ a~ /~
w+t m_ >>~ s~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~
~
m~ s~ o
§R~ ////m~~ ~i*~ a Gumamanw hme~ &n*aR~
y m aemkmlm LAR +~
a5
~s/~y~~~
k\\d
~
~
~
~ ~~ ~
~A-~
~ ~~ ~ ~~~
a~
}0
/h%\\mw ma s ~
rmGm ~ie~ m _mom
\\
~
~
m ~
~
w~ A ~
+/-m \\&5\\~
<<ues mm ~
h$e <<gam ~am~y &
+#Wem m ~
Ra<<~
q
Figure No.
15,6-112 15.6-123 15.6-124 15.6-125 Supporting EPU PUR Figure' Deleted 15.6-115~ Deleted Y.CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 CN-OA-02--58 Rev 0
'vCN-OA-02-58 Rev 0~
CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 Deleted CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 Previously Deleted-NIA Previously Deleted NIA
.._.. _ T Previously Deleted NIA Previously Deleted NIA
..._~
Previously Deleted N/A Previously Deleted "I
viously Deleted N/A et
....__... e__._...._....
15.6-126 Previously Deleted 15.6-..127 Previously Deleted 15.6-128 28 Deleted 1-1-101-01, Rev. 5 Supporting CalculationiDocument(s)
CN-OA-02-68 ~Rev 0
--.~~ __._.._
CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0-...
N/A -.-__
Previously Deleted 15.6-130 Previously Deleted NIA N/A 15.6-131 Previously Deleted N/A 15.6-132 Previously Deleted N/A 15.6-133 Previously Deleted.
...NIA_....
15.6-
..1 34 _. Previously Deleted.._...._
IA~..._...
15.6-135 Previously Deleted NIA N/A CN-OA-02-58 ~Rev 0 -... ~
5¬).59 REVIEW FORM Table 3 Affected FSAR Figures Nature of Changes Made to the FSAR With the new Vanalysis -for section 15.6 there were less -
figures than with the original ana lysis.
W i
With the new analysis for secton 15.6 there were less figures than with the orig inal analysis.
With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less figures than with the original analysis.
With the new analysis for section 5.6 ^there were less figures than with the original analysis.
¬ With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less figure s than with the origin al analysis.
With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less figures than with the original analysis.
With the now analysis for section 15.6 there were less E figures than with the original analysis.
NIA NIA-..._..
N/A NIA N/A With the now analysis for section 15.6 there were less figures than with the original analysis.
N/A N/A N/A NIA NIA N/A 50.59 Review Category
.50.59 Review Form Section ii.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section il.A.5 (i_e_
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form SectionIl.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section [I.A.5-(i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section iI.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 ReviewForm m Section fl-
.A
.-5-(i
.e dependent on LAR approval)
N/A
..._ _.--l-NlA^
N/A NIA _
NIA 50.59 Review Form Section il.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval)
Figure
- o.
115,6-136 15.6-137 15.6-138 5.6-141 Previously Deleted 15_6-142 Previously Deleted NIA 15.6-143 Previously DeletedNIA 15.6-144 Previously Deleted NIA 15,6-145 Previously Deleted
¬ N/A Previously Deleted NlA
-..._..._~._.
15.6-148 Previously Deleted NIA 15.6149 Previously Deleted
- NIA Previously Deleted Previously Deleted_....
Li-101-01, Rev. 5 Previously Deleted N/A
.^Previously Deleted ^^.~ NIA`_
Previously Deleted
- NIA Previously Deleted
. Deleted
ature of Change ade to the FSAR N/A With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less figures than with the original analysis.
CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0
' With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were loss
..._..____..._~._
_..._.-_._. ~_..
figures than with fthe ^original analysis......__,
CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0
_With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less figures than with the original analysis.
CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 j With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less figures than with the original analysis.
^
^s..
CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0
- With thenew analysis for section 15.6 there were le i figures than with the original analysis.
CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less figures than with the original analysis.
CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 L With the new analysis for section 15,6 there were le=ss figures than with the original analysis.
1 N/A NIA
_ _.~
_.._.e ___
NIA jN/A
....W NIA NIA 50.59 Review Form Section ILA.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e,,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section fl.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59. Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval)
.....~..__
50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e_,
dependent on LAR approval)
. 0.59 Review Form Section ll.A.5 (i.e,,
dependent on LAR approval)
With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less 50.59 Review Form Section 11A
.5 (i.e.
Table 3 Affected FSAR Figures Supporting EPU RUF2 Figure' Previously Deleted Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
_.___~_
NfA Previously Deleted
-N/A NIA Previously Deleted
--NIA _-
N/A
Page 68 of 83 LI-101-01, Rev. 5 15.6-174
_..i._.._.
eeted 1 -5.6-175
.,Delete d 15 6 176 -
Deleted 15.6__
.1.7...
._W36'--2-0'04-0052 Attach 5 Sect 2..12_4 15.6-178 No Change 15_6-_179 No
..Changs^
....~
15.6-180 No Change 15.6-
..18_1_
. No Change NIA Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
CN-DA-04-20 Rev 0 CN-OA-04-20 Rev a CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0
...CN-OA-04 4 20 Rev 0 CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less tiqures than with the origin al anal ysis.
With the new analysis for^ section 15.6 there were less CN-OA-04-20 ~Rev 0~.-.-
figures than with the original analysis.
CN-OA-04-20 Rev Q With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less figures than with the original analysis.
CN-OA-04_
.~20 Rev 0
_. _..._.._._.~-l- ~._........_..
__ r __ _
With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less I figures than,.. with the original analysis CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Figure was revised to reflect revised Smalf Break LTR-OA-04-77 Rev 2 LOCA analysis. The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table I N/A NIA Table 3 Affected FSAR Figures a
Nture of Changes Made to the FSAR es than with the original analysis.
9 N/A With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less figures than with the original analysis.
With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less figures than with the original analysis.
With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less figures than with the original analysis.
Kth ^the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less.
figures than with the original analysis.
NIA INIA _
NIA._
NIA 50.59 Review Category dependent on LAR approval)
NIA NIA 50.59 Review Form Section IIA.5 (i.e,~,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section H.A.5 (i.e_
dependent on LAR approval) 1 0.59 Review FVorm..Section ll.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval)
^ 50.59 Review Form Section Ii.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section ILA.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) m 50.59ReviewForm Section II,A,5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section Ii.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval)
-50.59^ Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval)
Figure Supporting FPU No.
PUR Figure' 15.6-161 Previously Deleted 15,6-162 4 Previously Deleted 15,6-163 Previously Deleted 15.6-164 Previously Deleted 15,6-165 Previously Deleted
~
15.6-166 PreviouslyDeleted
...~
'15.6,-_.167-Previously Deleted 15.6-168 Previously Deleted 15.6-169 ~Deleted W,
15.6-.9 70 IJ
.._....E e ete d 15.6-171 Delet
.--e -_____
d 15.6 172 Deleted 156 Deleted
LI-101-01, Rev-5 Table 3 Affected FSAR Figures Figure Supporting FPUm v
_.__ ~....._
.~
_.~._.....~.._.
Nature of Changes
._..____._..._.T _._.
......-..__._...._.__.~_. _.
No.
FUR Figure t
Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
Made to the FSAR 50.59 Review Category 15.6-182
.No Change-N/A fN/A ~
......~_.__
__.~
..._W~._
tVlA~_
.._...____~___._._.
..~._._.__
15.6-183 No Change N/A NIA N/A 15.6-18
..__..... W No_
Change N/A
_-W
...~..
N/A
___~.._.__
NIA 15.6-185 No Change
._N/A
.....W ~
.m_
...~
N/A
_.._. _.....-._~__...__._
N/A 15.6 86V
_.__.-~ _.,. _........., _
Deleted
,~__.
ON-OA-02-58
_.W.
Rev 0
.._..,_-.,W
..., ~_.....
With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less..
...,_.-.......,....~
50.59 Review Form Section ILA.5 (i.e.,
figures than with the origina l analysis, dependent on LAR approval) 15,6-187 m.
Deleted CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less 50.59 Review Farm Section ILA.5 (i.e.,
figures than with the original analysis.
dependent on LAIR approval) 15.6-m188 Deleted CN-OA 58 Rev 0
^With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were Iess 50.59 Review Form Section II.A:5 ( ¬ figures than with the origina l analysis, dependent on LAR approval)
_~
15.6-189
__~
___._.__
Deleted CN OA-02-58
.._~___.~_,_.._.___~...._.,.-._.,..______....._.-
Rev 0 the new analysis for section 15.6 - ---------- -----------
there were less 50,59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
figures than with the original analysis.
dependent on LAR approval) 15.6-190 Deleted
..GN-OA-02-58 Rev 0
? With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less -...
50.59 Review
_,.,~,...._ __
Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
figures than with the original ana lysis, dependent on LAR approval) 15.6-191 Deleted c CN-OA-02-58
...__~__........~...
.....,.~.,
Rev 0
..~_,.,..,_,_
With the new analysis for section 15.6
.......... T there were less 50.59 Review
..__~__.._.
Form Section fl.A.5 (i.e.,
figuresthan with the original analysis-dependent an LAR approval) 15.6-192 Deleted CN-OA-02-58
_..... -._.,..._.-._-....._. r _
Rev 0
..._....-_.....-., ~
.a..'With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less 50.59 Review Form Section ILA.5 (i.e.,
_.~-_...._
. ~_.._. _ _.
. _... _.._.-_._...________.
...._.~_..._..__.__....
figures than with the origina l analysis.
......._~.._..
.....~ _......._.
dependent on t AR approval) 5.6 93 Deleted CN OA-02-58 Rev 0 With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less, 50.59 Review Form Section 11,A.5 (i.e.,~
' figures than with the original a nalysis.
dependant on LAR approval) 15.6-194 -. _._
Deleted CN-OA-02-58
~._..
Rev 0 m..
' With the new analysis for section 15.6
~.
there were less 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,_
figures than with the original analysis, dependent on LAR approval) 15.6-195 Deleted
_...r___
CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0
_------ _,.,-.-I`----.. `_..____-_._
With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less l 50.59 Review
.....,__--l- _
Form Section ILA.5 (i.e.,
figures than with the original analysis.
dependent on LAR approval) 15.6-196 Deleted
.CN-OA-02-58
.._.~.__._
Rev 0
_.._~
With
-_.__.. _ _.... _._~......_, _ _.__-..
..__~_.......
the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less
..50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
figures than with the original analysis.
dependent on LAR approval) 05.6-197
_....-~-. ~.._
Deleted
~.__...._
CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0
-.._.W~_......__
.~.
....._~.._
..__T~._.._~_.
With the new analysis for section 15.6
..~._..--__.._.._
there were less 50.59 Review
_......._... ~_.....
Form Section H.A.5 (i.e.,
figures than with the original analysis.
dependent on LAR approval) 15.6-198 Deleted CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0
^With the new analysis for section 95.6 there were, less 50.59 Review Form Section Ii.A.5 (i.e_
figures than with the original analysis.
dependent on LAIR approval) 15.6-19g Deleted CN-OA 02-58
.._~..
Rev 0
~......-~_..._._`
With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less
..50.59 Review Four; Section ILA.5 (i.e.,
figures than with the original analysis, dependent on LAR approval) 15-6-200 Deleted CN OA-02-58 Rev 0 With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less 50.59 Review Form Section II A 5 (i.e.,
..~_. ~__.
` -
l figures than with the original analysis.
pendent on LAIR approval)
Figure -..
No.
15.6-201 15.6-202 ~..
-15.6-203^_.
15.6-..204 5.6 205 15.6-206.
15.6-..2017 Deleted Deleted Deleted W
3 F 1-2004-0052._-._
Attach 5, Fig 2.12-52 W
3 F 1-2004-0052 -
Attach 5, Fig 2.12-53 3F 1-2.004-0052 Attach 5, Fig 2.12-54 3
2004 0052 Attach 5, Fig 2.12-55 W
3 F 1-2004-0052.
Attach 5, Fig 2.12-56 W3F1-2004-0052 Attach 5, Fig 2.12-57 3 1 2004 (3052 Attach 5, Fig 2.12-58 W3F1-2004-0052 Attach 5, Fig 2.12-36 Li-101-0'1, Rev. 5 CN-OA-02-58 _Rev
.a.._.
CN-OA-02-58 Rev 0 CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 15.6-206
- CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 15.6-207 CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 15.6-208 CN-OA-04-20-..Rev 0 -Fig - '15.6-209
.CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 1.
~-.___...._.
5.6_210 CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 -FL9
_..15.6-217 C
N-O 20 Rev -0
..Fig.
15.6-212 q
~ ~
~CN OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 15.6-213 Attach 5 Fig 2.12-59 CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 15.6-214 50.59 REVIEW FORM Table 3 Affected FEAR Figures Nature of Changes Made to the FSAR With the new analysis for section 1-a.6 there were less figures than with the original analysis.
With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less figures than with the original analysis.
With them new analysis for section 15,6 there were less figures than with the original analysis.
With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less figures than with the original analysis.
With the new analysis for section 15.6 there were less figures than with the original analysis.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and-specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Fioure column of this table The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and~~~ T specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
50.59 Review Category 50.59 Review Form Section ILA.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) dependent on LAR approval)
__5 0.59 Review Form Section il.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section fI.A.5 (i.e_
dependent. on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section ILA.5 (i,e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form &?
- :tion II.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section ILA.5 (k!.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section 1i.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on t.AR approval) 150.59 Review Form Section tf.A.5 (Le,,,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section tl.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
W
~~
-- ---^
-~
.3.
Thechangesarecovered by the EPU LARand 50.59 Review Form Section 11-A.5 (i.e.,
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
i The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and
......^,
.50.59-Review--Form Section 11.A.5~(i.e.,
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting Fm PU dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section ILK5 (i.,e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section II,A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval)
Page 71 of 83 igure Supporting EPU -..
No.
PUR Figure 1 15.6-215..
.2 Attach 5, Fig 2.12-37 15.6-216 W3F1-2004-0052 -.__
Attach 5, Fig 2.12-38 004-00-b-2 5
217 Attach 5 Fig 212-39 2-39 115.6-21g
.._F-I
,. 0...
4 0g 3
z0-52 Attach 5, Fig 2.12-40 LI-101-0 1, Rev. 5 Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0~Fig 15.6-215 CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 15.6-217 CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 15.6-218 uTable 3W~
Affected FSAR Figures Nature of Changes Made to the FSAR The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and
..^
specifically the figures fisted in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column o f this table.
CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 15.6-216 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and~T specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and -.^
specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU
..~.__ __-..._
_-~__T E PUR Figure column of this table, m...r 15.6-219
._ W3~
F1-200 4.-
.00-52__
CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fia 15,6-219 The changes are covered by the EPU 7
LAR_
and specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table.
W3FII-2004-0052 1 CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 15.6-2211 The changes are covered by.fhe EPU LAR and Attach 5, Fig 2.12-42 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU
..._..._ ~
, PUR Figure column of this table.
15.6-221 W3F1-2004-0052 GN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 15.6-227
~ The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and Attach 5, Fig 2.12-43 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU
_.~
....._._.. _ _._. ____.__. T_..
.._-._..._ _. --._.~._.._-~- PUR
. Figure column of this table-....__ __.,.
"15.6-222 3F1 -2004-0052 ON-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 15.6-222
~ The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and Attach 5, Fig 2.12-44 I specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
50.59 Review Category 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5.(i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section ILA.5 (i.e .
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section WILA.5 (Le,,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form ^ Section P.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form _Section II.A.5 (i.e.,..
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section ~JI.A.5m(Le.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section ILA.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section ILk5 (Le,,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section~II.A.5 (Le.,
dependent an LAR approval) 50,59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
3 W 3F 1-2004-0052
..CN-CA-04-20
....~
.....~
Rev 0~Fig 15.6-223~
.~.
The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and...
Attach 5, Fig 2.12-45 specifically the figures fisted in the Supporting EPU
, PUR Figure column of this table, 115.6-224
^W 3 F 1-20(14-0052
..._.._..-.....~..
CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 15.6-224
'The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and Attach 5, Fig 2.12-4ij j specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
15.6-225
^
W 3 F 1-20074-0052 CN-OA_04
-._ -2.
0 Rev a Fig 15
.6-2 25 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and Attach 5, Fig 2.12-47 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table.
15.6-226 W3F1-2004-0052
.~^
CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 15.6-226~.
The changes are covered by the EPU~LAR and Attach 5, Fig 2.12-48 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
15.6-227 W3F1-2004-0052 CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 15.6-227 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and
L" 01TY Rev 5
Table 3 Affected FEAR Figures Figure Supporting EPU Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
Nature of Changes 50.59 Review Category No.
PUR Figure Madeto the FSAR Aft Fig 2,U49 specMcaNy the figures listed in the Supporting EPLJ dependent on LA R approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
15.6-228 W3Fl-2004-0052 CA-000520 Rev 0 Fig 15AA28 The changes am covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section HA.5 (he.,
Attach 5
. Fig 2,12-50 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent an LAR approval)
FUR Figure column of this table, 15,6-229 W3FI-2004-0052 CN-0*0460 Rev 0 Q 15W29 The changes am covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section il.Ab On, Attach 5, Fig 2,12-51 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
15.6-230 NOT IN FUR (This CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 1&6-230 This figure is not contained in the EPU LAR, however, 50,59 Review Form Section 11,A,5 {i.e.,
Figure plotted for the it is contained in calculation CN-OA-04-20 which was dependent on LAR approval) limiting 0.055 ft break developed for the Small Break LOCA analysis and is size ody, see FSAR the bask far the Small: Break LOCA analysis presented Table 15.6-16a) in the EPU LAR PUR, and therefore implicitly covered by the EPU LAR. This is additional information.
I 5.6-231 NOT IN PUR (This CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 15.6-231 This figure is not contoured in the EPU LAR, however, 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
Figure plotted for the it is contained in calculation CN-OA-04-20 which was dependent on LAR approval) limiting 0.055 ft break developed for the Small Break LOCA analysis and is size only, see FSAR the basis for the Small Break LOCA analysis presented Table 15546a) in the EPU LAR PUR, and therefore implicitly covered by the EPU LAR. This is additional information 15.6-232 NOT IN PUR (This CN-DAM400 Rev (1 Fig 15AA32 This figure is not contained in the EPU LAR, however, 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
Figure plotted for the it is contained in calculation CN-OA-04-20 which was dependent on LAR approval) limiting 0.055 ft break developed for the Small Break LOCA analysis and is size only, see FSAR the basis for the Small Break LOCA analysis presented Table 15lq6a) in the EPU LAR PUR, and therefore implicitly covered by the EPU LAR. This is additional information.
15.6-233 NOT IN FUR (This CN-OA-04-20 Rev 0 Fig 15.6-233 This figure is not contained in the EPU LAR, however, 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 {i.e.,
Figure plotted for the it is contained in calculation CN-OA-04-20 which was dependent on LAR approval) 5miting 0.055 ft break developed for the Small Break LOCA analysis and is size only, see FSAR the basis for the Small Break LOCA analysis presented Table 15.6-16a) in the EPU LAR PUR, and therefore implicitly covered by the EPU LAR. This is additional information.
15,9_1 2.13.9.1.1-1 CN-TAS-02-78 Rev 0 App D Fig D-1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section 11,A,5 (i.e.,
LTR-RCPL-04-32, Rev 0 specifically the figures hod W the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
PUR Figure column of this table.
150-2 2.13.9.1.1-2 CN-TAS-02-78 Rev 0 App D Fig D-2 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and 50.59 Review Form Section II.A.5 (i.e.,
LTR-RCPL-04-32, Rev 0 specifically the figures hod in the Supporting EPU dependent on LAR approval)
LTR-TAS-04-119, Rev 4 FUR Figure column of this table,
Page 73 of 83 L"01&1, Rev. 5 50.59 REVIEW FORM Tabk 3 Affected FSAR Figures Notes :
1. Attachment 5 to Letter W3FI-2003-0074, Waterford 3 Extended Power Uprate Report, unless otherwise noted.
50.59 Review Category 50.59 Review Form Section H.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section JI.A.5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval) 50.59 Review Form Section =5 (ta, dependent on LAR approval)....
50,59 Review Form Section ILA,5 (i.e.,
dependent on LAR approval)
Figure No.
Supporting EPU PUR Figure 1 Supporting Calculation/Document(s)
Nature of Changes Made to the FSAR 151-3 2.13.9 2.1-4 CN-TAS-02-78 Rev 0 App D Fig D-1 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and LTR-RCPL-04-32, Rev 0 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
151-4 P2 A 3 A A A 0 CNAAS4248 Rev 0 App d Fig L7-3 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and LTR-RCPL-04-32, Rev 0 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU FUR Figure column of this table.
151-5 CN-TAS-02-78 Rev 0 App D Q D-5 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and LTR-RCPL-04-32, Rev 0
~ specifically the figures fisted in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
155 213011-6 CN-TAS-02-78 Rev 0 App D Fig D-6 The changes are covered by the EPU LAR and LTR-RCPL-04-32, Rev 0 specifically the figures listed in the Supporting EPU PUR Figure column of this table.
Page 74 of 83 B.
ENVIRONMENTAL SCREENING If any of the following questions is answered "yes," an Environmental Review must be performed in accordance with NMM Procedure EV-115, "Environmental Evaluations," and attached to this 50.59 Review. Consider both routine and non-routine (emergency) discharges when answering these questions.
Will the proposed Change being evaluated:
LI-101-01, Rev. 5 Yes No 1,
Involve a land disturbance of previously disturbed land areas in excess of one acre (i.e.,
grading activities, construction of buildings, excavations, reforestation, creation or removal of ponds)?
2.
[_
involve a land disturbance of undisturbed land areas (i.e., grading activities, construction, excavations, reforestation, creating, or removing ponds)?
- 3.
]
Involve dredging activities in a lake, river, pond, or stream?
- 4.
[]
Increase the amount of thermal heat being discharged to the river or lake?
- 5.
Increase the concentration or quantity of chemicals being discharged to the river, lake, or air?
- 6. E Discharge any chemicals new or different from that previously discharged?
7.
[
Change the design or operation of the intake or discharge structures?
- 8.
[]
Modify the design or operation of the cooling tower that will change water or air flow characteristics?
9.
© Modify the design or operation of the plant that will change the path of an existing water discharge or that will result in a new water discharge?
10.
© Modify existing stationary fuel burning equipment (i.e., diesel fuel oil, butane, gasoline, propane, and kerosene)?
11.
[
Involve the installation of stationary fuel burning equipment or use of portable fuel burning equipment (i.e., diesel fuel oil, butane, gasoline, propane, and kerosene)?
12.
[
Involve the installation or use of equipment that will result in a new or additional air emission discharge?
- 13.
Involve the installation or modification of a stationary or mobile tank?
14.
El Z Involve the use or storage of oils or chemicals that could be directly released into the environment?
15. 0 Z Involve burial or placement of any solid wastes in the site area that may affect runoff, surface water, or groundwater?
Page 75 of 83 C.
SECURITY PLAN SCREENING If any of the following questions is answered "yes, a Security Plan Review must be performed by the Security Department to determine actual impact to the Plan and the need for a change to the Plan.
Could the proposed activity being evaluated:
LI-101-01, Rev. 5 58.59 REVIEW FORM Documentation for accepting any "yes" statement for these reviews will be attached to this 50.59 Review or referenced below.
Yes 1.
0 E Add, delete, modify, or otherwise affect Security department responsibilities (e.g., including fire brigade, fire watch, and confined space rescue operations)?
- 2.
[
Result in a breach to any security barrier(s) (e.g., HVAC ductwork, fences, doors, walls, ceilings, floors, penetrations, and ballistic barriers)?
- 3.
[
Cause materials or equipment to be placed or installed within the Security Isolation Zone?
F]
z Affect (block, move, or alter) security lighting by adding or deleting lights, structures, buildings, or temporary facilities?
- 5.
[]
Modify or otherwise affect the intrusion detection systems (e.g., E-fields, microwave, fiber optics)?
- 6.
Modify or otherwise affect the operation or field of view of the security cameras?
- 7.
Modify or otherwise affect (block, move, or alter) installed access control equipment, intrusion detection equipment, or other security equipment?
- 8.
Modify or otherwise affect primary or secondary power supplies to access control equipment, intrusion detection equipment, other security equipment, or to the Central Alarm Station or the Secondary Alarm Station?
- 9.
CI Modify or otherwise affect the facility's security-related signage or land vehicle barriers, including access roadways?
10.
El 0 Modify or otherwise affect the facility's telephone or security radio systems?
Page 76 of 83 D.
INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION (ISFSI) SCREENING If any of the following questions is answered "yes, an ISFSI Review must be performed in accordance with NMM Procedure LI-112, "72.48 Review," and attached to this Review.
Will the proposed Change being evaluated :
LI-101-01, Rev. 5 Yes No 1.
7 E Any activity that directly impacts spent fuel cask storage or loading operations?
2.
Involve the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) including the concrete pad, security fence, and lighting?
El 0 Involve a change to the on-site transport equipment or path from the Fuel Building to the ISFSI?
4.
Involve a change to the design or operation of the Fuel Building fuel bridge including setpoints and limit switches?
5.
E]
E Involve a change to the Fuel Building or Control Room(s) radiation monitoring?
6.
El Z(
Involve a change to the Fuel Building pools including pool levels, cask pool gates, cooling water sources, and water chemistry?
Involve a change to the Fuel Building handling equipment (e.g., bridges and cask cranes, structures, load paths, lighting, auxiliary services, etc)?
8.
E]
Z Involve a change to the Fuel Building electrical power?
- 9.
F~
Z involve a change to the Fuel Building ventilation?
1©.
[]
Involve a change to the ISFSI security?
11.
0 Z Involve a change to off-site radiological release projections from non-ISFSI sources?
12.
R Involve a change to spent fuel characteristics?
13 Redefine/change heavy load pathways?
14.
Q Fire and explosion protection near or in the on-site transport paths or near the ISFSI?
15.
F}
Z Involve a change to the loading bay or supporting components?
16.
New structures near the ISFSI?
17.
Q is Modifications to any plant systems that support dry fuel storage activities?
18.
[
Involve a change to the nitrogen supply, service air, demineralized water or borated water system in the Fuel Building?
Page 77 of 83 License Amendment Determina Does the proposed Change being evaluated represent a change to a method of evaluation F-1 Yes ONLY? If "Yes, Questions 1 - 7 are not applicable ; answer only Question 8.
If "No," answer No all questions below.
Does the proposed Change :
1.
Result in more than a minimal increase in the frequency of occurrence of an accident previously evaluated in the FSAR?
BASIS :
RegardincL FSAR Section 15.1.3 Steam System Pipinq Failures Post-Trip Return-to-Power:
The accident previously evaluated in the FSAR is discussed in Section 15.1.3.1, Steam System Piping Failures Post-Trip Return-to-Power, which is classified as a limiting fault. This accident was re-evaluated for EPU in calculation CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1.
The objective of the main steam line break (MSLB) with or without a concurrent LOOP event re-analysis for EPU was to document the impact of :
This revised analysis has been submitted to the NRC for review and acceptance via revised EPU PUR section 2.13.1.3.1, included in Attachment 1 to Entergy Letter W3F1-20104-0096 which is supplemental to the EPU LAR NPF-38-249. FSAR Section 15.1.3.1 has been revised to reflect the re-analysis and is in agreement with the EPU LAR.
The LAR and its supplements (refer to ER-W3-2001-1149-015, Section 2.2.6 for a list of letters containing the LAR and supplements) were issued requesting NRC approval for implementation of EPU at the Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station. This submittal encompasses the analyses completed, and methodology utilized in support of the EPU evaluations.
In accordance with Section II.A.5 of this 50.59 Review, the validity of this review is dependent on NRC approval of the EPU LAR and is also dependent on a review of the EPU LAR SER (when issued by the NRC) to ensure that the ER and this 50.59 review remain in agreement with the approved SER.
Stating the acceptance criteria in a revised manner (i.e., 24 kw/ft vs. 21 kw/ft) will not impact the frequency of occurrence of the accident.
There are no new demands on plant equipment which impact frequency associated with the revised analysis
. Additionally, all aspects of the re-analysis of this event, except for the use of 24 w/ft, is being reviewed by the NRC in the EPU LAR, therefore, evaluation of this event is not required under 50.59 to determine if the changes result in more than a minimal increase in the frequency of occurrence of an accident previously evaluated in the FSAR.
2 Result in more than a minimal increase in the likelihood of occurrence of a malfunction of a LJ Yes structure, system, or component important to safety previously evaluated in the FSAR?
[I No BASIS :
Regarding FSAR Section 15.1.3.9 Steam S stem Pi in Failures Post-Trip Return-to-Power :
The malfunction previously evaluated in the FSAR is discussed in Section 15.1.3.1, Steam System Piping Failures Post-Trip Return-to-Power. This accident was re-evaluated for EPU in calculation CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 _ The malfunction which initiates this accident is a main steam line pipe break
- no specific initiator for the break is given in the original or revised analysis. Other malfunctions of equipment occurring after the initiation of the accident are also discussed in FSAR Section 15.1.3.1.
LI-101-01, Rev. 5
.59 EVALUATION 50.59 REVIEW FORM a An increase in rated power to 3716 MWt c A decrease in the LSGP trip and MSIS actuation setpoints o A reduction in CEA worth at trip a Transition to the CENTS transient simulation code c Change in most negative MTC from -4.0x10 _4 Ap/'F to -4.2x1fl_' Ap/ F Yes No
BASIS :
50.59 REVIEW FORM Page 78 of 83 See response to Question 1 above for the objective of the re-analysis of this event for EPU.
See response to Question 1 above regarding the relationship and validity of this evaluation to the EPU LAR.
This revised analysis has been submitted to the NRC for review and acceptance via revised PUR section 2.13.1.3.1, included in Attachment 1 to Entergy Letter W3F1-2004-(3096 which is supplemental to the EPU LAR NPF-38-249. FSAR Section 15.1.3.1 has been revised to reflect the re-analysis and is in agreement with the EPU LAR.
Stating the acceptance criteria in a revised manner (i,e., 24 kwift vs. 21 kwwlft) will not impact the likelihood of occurrence of malfunctions.
There are no new demands on plant equipment which impact likelihood associated with the revised analysis. Additionally, ail aspects of the re-analysis of this event, except for the use of 24 kwift, is being reviewed by the NRC in the EPU LAR, therefore, evaluation of this event is not required under 5¬}.59 to determine if the changes result in more than a minimal increase in the likelihood of occurrence of a malfunction of a structure, system, or component important to safety previously evaluated in the FSAR.
- 3.
Result in more than a minimal increase in the consequences of an accident previously evaluated in the FSAR?
Regarding FSAR Section 15.1.3.1, Steam System Piping Failures Post-Trip Return-to-Power :
D Yes No The accident with radiological consequences previously evaluated in the FSAR is evaluated in Section 15.1.3.1, Steam System Piping Failures Post-Trip Return-to-Power This accident was re-evaluated for EPU in calculation CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1. The radiological consequences of this accident was originally evaluated in FSAR Section 15.1.3.1.5.
See response to Question 1 above for the objective of the re-analysis of this event for EPU.
See response to Question 1 above regarding the relationship and validity of this evaluation to the EPU LAR.
This revised analysis has been submitted to the NRC for review and acceptance via revised PUR section 2.13,1.3.1, included in Attachment 1 to W3F1-2004-0096 which is supplemental to the EPU LAR NPF 249. FSAR Section 15.1.3.1 has been revised to reflect the re-analysis and is in agreement with the EPU LAR. The evaluation of radiological consequences of this accident is contained in revised FSAR section 15.1.3.3.5.
Radiologica l consequences of this accident are not within the scope of this ER, they are evaluated by ER-W3-2004-0276-000, Implementation of Alternate Source Term (AST) which also includes EPU related impact to dose consequences. However, the dose consequence evaluation for MSLB is based on a 2% fuel melt fuel failure, which is either equal to (for TID-14844 source terms) or conservative (for alternate source terms) with respect to an assumed 10% fuel failure due to DNBR (ECS04-004).
Stating the acceptance criteria for evaluating fuel melt in a revised manner (i.e., 24 kwift vs. 21 kwift) has not impacted the fuel failure limits for EPU, as described in the PUR and its supplements. Thus, since the amount of fuel failure permitted has not changed, there is no increase in the consequences of the event.
Additionally, all aspects of the re-analysis of this event, except for the use of 24 kwift, is being reviewed by the NRC in the EPU LAR, therefore, evaluation of this event is not required under 50.59 to determine if the changes result in more than a minimal increase in the consequences of an accident previously evaluated in the FSAR.
4 Result in more than a minimal increase in the consequences of a malfunction of a structure, 11-1 Yes system, or component important to safety previously evaluated in the FSAR?
E3 No BASIS:
Regardinm FSAR Secti.orn 1 5,1,3.1_Steam.System Pi in Failures Post-Trip Return-to-Power:
The malfunction with radiological consequences previously evaluated in the FSAR is evaluated in Section 15.1.3.1, Steam System Piping Failures Post-Trip Return-to-Power. This accident was re-evaluated for EPU in calculation CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1.
The radiological consequences of this malfunction was originally evaluated in FSAR Section 15.1.3.1.5. The malfunction which initiates this accident is a main steam line pipe break.
Other malfunctions of equipment occurring after the initiation of the accident are also discussed in FSAR Section 15.1.3.1.
LI-101-01, Rev. 5
ge 79 of 83 See response to Question 1 above for the objective of the re-analysis of this event for EPU.
See response to Question 1 above regarding the relationship and validity of this evaluation to the EPU LAR.
This revised analysis has been submitted to the NRC for review and acceptance via revised PUR section 2,13.1.3.1, included in Attachment 1 to W3F1-2004-0096 which is supplemental to the EPU LAR NPF 249. FSAR Section 15.1.3.1 has been revised to reflect the re-analysis and is in agreement with the EPU LAR
. The evaluation of radiological consequences of this accident is contained in revised FSAR section 15.1.3.3.5 Radiological consequences of this accident are not within the scope of this ER, they are evaluated by ER-W3-2004-0276-000, Implementation of Alternate Source Term (AST) which also includes EPU related impact to dose consequences.
However, the dose consequence evaluation for MSLB is based on a 2% fuel melt fuef failure, which is either equal to or conservative with respect to an assumed 10% fuel failure due to DNBR (ECS04-004) Stating the acceptance criteria for evaluating fuel melt in a revised manner (i.e., 24 kw,!ft vs. 21 kwlft) has not impacted the fuel failure limits for EPU, as described in the PUR and its supplements. Thus, since the amount of fuel failure permitted has not changed, there is no increase in the consequences of the event.
Additionally, all aspects of the re-analysis of this event, except for the use of 24 kwlft, is being reviewed by the NRC in the EPU LAR, therefore, evaluation of this event is not required under 50,59 to determine if the changes result in more than a minimal increase in the consequences of a malfunction of a structure, system, or component important to safety previously evaluated in the FSAR
- 5.
Create a possibility for an accident of a different type than any previously evaluated in the
[] Yes FSAR?
No BASIS:
Regardinq SAR Section 15.13.1, Steam System Piping Failures Post-Trip Return-to-Power :
This evaluation is restricted to the re-analysis, for EPU, of an accident previously evaluated in the FSAR, i.e., Section 15.1.3.1, Steam System Piping Failures Post-Trip Return-to-Power, which is classified as a limiting fault. This accident was re-evaluated for EPU in calculation CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1. The reanalysis did not create a different type of accident.
See response to Question 1 above for the objective of the re-analysis of this event for EPU.
See response to Question 1 above regarding the relationship and validity of this evaluation to the EPU LAR.
This revised analysis has been submitted to the NRC for review and acceptance via revised PUR section 2.13.1.3.1, included in Attachment 1 to Entergy Letter W3F1-2004-0096 which is supplemental to the EPU LAIR NPF-38-249. FSAR Section 15,1.3.1 has been revised to reflect the re-analysis and is in agreement with the EPU LAR.
All aspects of the re-analysis of this event, except for the use of 24 kwfft, is being reviewed by the NRC in the EPU LAR, therefore, evaluation of this event is not required under 50.59 to determine if the changes create a possibility for an accident of a different type than any previously evaluated in the FSAR.
- 6.
Create a possibility for a malfunction of a structure, system, or component important to safety 0 Yes with a different result than any previously evaluated in the FSAR?
No BASIS:
Redarc inq FSAR...Section 15.1.3.
.:1. Steam System Piping Failures Post-Trip..Return-to-Power:
This evaluation is restricted to the re-analysis. for EPU, of an accident, caused by a malfunction (steam line pipe break), previously evaluated in the FSAR, i.e., Section 15.1.3.1, Steam System Piping Failures Post-Trip Return-to-Power, which is classified as a limiting fault. This accident was re-evaluated for EPU in calculation Chi-TAS-02-97 Rev 1.
The reanalysis did not create a malfunction with a different result, i.e., the malfunction (steam line pipe break) still results in a Limiting Fault "Increase in Heat Removal by the Secondary System (Turbine Plant) type accident defined in FSAR Section 15.1.3.1.
See response to Question 1 above for the objective of the re-analysis of this event for EPU, See response to Question 1 above regarding the relationship and validity of this evaluation to the EPU LAR.
This revised analysis has been submitted to the NRC for review and acceptance via revised PUR section LI-101-01, Rev. 5
Page 80 of 83 BASIS:
2,13.1.3.1, included in Attachment 1 to Entergy Letter W3171 -2004-0096 which is supplemental to the EPU LAR NPF-38-249. FSAR Section 15.1.3.1 has been revised to reflect the re-analysis and is in agreement with the EPU LAR.
All aspects of the re-analysis of this event, except for the use of 24 kwift, is being reviewed by the NRC in the EPU LAR, therefore, evaluation of this event is not required under 50.59 to determine if the changes create a possibility for a malfunction of a structure, system, or component important to safety with a different result than any previously evaluated in the FSAR
- 7.
Result in a design basis fimit for a fission product barrier as described in the FSAR being 1~ Yes exceeded or altered?
No Reoardinq_FSAR Section 15.1.3.1..Steam System Pipinq Failures Post-Trip Return-to-Power:
Evaluation of the Fuel Melt Criteria used for Return to Power Steam Line Break with No Loss of Offsite Power Discussion of Transient The Return to Power Steam Line Break (RTP SLB) with No Loss of Offsite Power (LOOP) postulates a rupture in one of the main steam lines between the steam generators (SGs) and the turbine.
In the presence of a negative MTC, the reductions in RCS temperature add positive reactivity to the core reducing the amount by which the core is subcritical.
Core power can increase due to the return to criticality and, due to the very high local peaking, the local power can approach the fuel melt fuel safety limit even though core average power is only a few percent of rated.
History of the Fuel..
.. Melt Safety
..Limit As originally written, the Waterford-3 Technical Specification contained the following fuel safety limit, The Technical Specification quotes the calculated steady state linear heat rate that corresponds to center line melt (21 kwlft), but also contains provision for adjustment for fuel rod dynamics.
The RTP SLB with no LOOP had always demonstrated that the steady state safety limit on linear heat rate was not exceeded.
For previous analyses, this entailed demonstrating that the peak linear heat rate remained below 21 kwlft. Hence there was no need to adjust for fuel rod dynamics.
The Subcritical and HZP CEA withdrawal events have typically resulted in linear heat rates in the neighborhood of 30 kwlft. While this is nominally above the steady state limit on linear heat rate, the brief period of time in which these events were producing sensible core heat, meant that the increase in fuel temperatures remained well below the temperatures at which fuel melting would occur.
Acceptability of the results of these events has been done by performing an adiabatic energy deposition evaluation.
So while these events reported high LHR, the fuel temperatures have been validated to remain acceptable when fuel rod dynamics were considered.
The Waterford-3 FSAR has long documented this alternative method of demonstrating fuel integrity In 2002, during the review of the Waterford 3 Appendix K margin recovery power uprate request, the NRC noticed that the results for the two CEA withdrawal scenarios exceeded the steady state limit as specified in the plant technical specifications. The NRC stated in the Safety Evaluation for Amendment 181, which addressed this issue, that :
The actual safety limit was subsequently changed to more directly indicate that fuel melting was the criteria being protected against. Technical Specification 2.1.1.2 safety limit was revised from "Peak Linear I-101-01, Rev. 5 Peak Linear Heat Rate 2.1.1.2 The peak linear heat rate (adjusted for fuel rod dynamics) of the fuel shall be maintained less than or equal to 29.0 kwfft.
"The two AOOs for which the PLHR Safety Limit is exceeded are the CEA Withdrawal events from Subcritical and Low Pourer conditions.
These events and their acceptance criteria are discussed in Standard Review Plan (SRP) Section 95.4.1. While the current Safety Limit of 21 kwfft is exceeded during two AO©s, the peak fuel centerline temperature does not exceed the melting point, which is the true acceptance criteria for this event. "
Page 81 of 83 Peak Centerline Fuel Temperature 50.59 REVIEW FORM Heat Rate" to "Peak Centerline Fuel Temperature" and revised, per Amendment 181, to read, 2.1.1.2 The peak fuel centerline temperature shall be maintained less that 5080 °F (decreasing by 58 °F per 113, 300 MWD/MTU for bumup and adjusting for burnable poisons per CENPf3-382-P-A)
The technical specification bases associated with the revised technical specification safety limit for Peak Centerline Fuel Temperature included the following, A steady state peak linear heat rate of 21 kwlft has been established as the Limiting Safety System Setting to prevent fuel centerline melting during normal steady state operation.
Following design basis anticipated operational occurrences, the transient linear heat rate may exceed 21 kwlft provided the fuel centerline melt temperature is not exceeded.
Thus the basis of the new technical specifications recognized transient results in excess of 21 kwlft, provided that additional analytical steps demonstrated that the fuel centerline melt safety limit was not exceeded.
As stated in the Safety Evaluation for Amendment 181 which changed the above safety limit, this safety limit is applicable for normal operation and anticipated operational occurrences (AOOs). Additionally, it states that :
"The intent of the Peak Linear Heat Rate (PLHR) Safety Limit is to prevent the fuel centerline temperature from reaching the melting point, which conservatively assures that there will be no breach in cladding integrity.'.
Power Uprate.Anatysfs The RTP SLI3 with no LOOP performed for power uprate resulted in linear heat rates in excess of 21 kwlft.
The peak linear heat rate for the event was however demonstrated to be below 24 kw/ft (i.e., 22.8 kw/ t per Table 2.13.1.3.1-6 of the revised LAIR PUR per Attachment 1 of W3Fl-2004-0096).
A study performed several years ago (8{367-PHR-139, Rev 00 "Return-to-Power Steam Line Break Analysis for Calvert Cliffs Unit 1 Cycle 8," May 23, 1985) demonstrated that for 14x14 fuel, at steam line break coolant conditions, fuel melting would not occur until linear heat rates were in excess of 24 kwift.
This study used STRIKIN 11 to perform a detailed fuel temperature calculation at these high linear heat rate
- steam line break conditions. A comparison between the coolant conditions in the 14x14 evaluation and the Waterford-3 power uprate conditions were included in calculation CN-TAS-02-97.
The comparison showed good agreement between the coolant conditions. Additionally, it was noted that the study was on 1414 fuel, larger diameter than Waterford-3 16x16 fuel. Thus, for a given linear heat rate, the Waterford-3 fuel would predict lower fuel temperatures.
It was therefore concluded in CN-TAS-02-97 that demonstrating that the maximum linear heat rate of 24 kw/ft was a still conservative method of demonstrating that fuel melt would not occur and that the results of the RTP SLB with no LOOP still demonstrate no fuel failure due violation of the fuel melt safety limit.
Thus, the requirements of Technical Specifications 2.1.1.2 are met.
Literature Search Section 7.2.1.1.1.3 of the FSAR contains reference to 21 kwlft as the setpoint for the high local power density trip At the time of the revised technical specification, it was decided not to pursue relief on this setpoint in the CPCs. The presence of this conservative lower trip setpoint does not invalidate the use of alternative calculations which justify a higher linear heat rate as the onset of fuel melt. Note that since the CPCs must protect against slowing changing power increases, the use o¬ a steady state limit for linear heat rate (such as 21 kwtft) is appropriate.
Section 7.2.2.1.1 of the FSAR mentions that AOOs should not violate the 21 kw/ft fuel safety limit which corresponds to the onset of fuel melting.
Its inclusion as an absolute limit in the current FSAR is in disagreement with the methodology described elsewhere in the current FSAR for CEA withdrawal (see next). This is being addressed in the Chapter 7 ER for EPU, ER-W3-2001-1149-007.
Section 15.4.1.1.3 of the FSAR describes the current analytical method for CEA withdrawal in which this AOO violates the old 21 kw/ft safety limit on linear heat rate but demonstrates compliance with the underlying "no melt" criteria by an alternative calculation.
The use of an alternative calculation to demonstrate that no melt would occur at an elevated linear heat rated is specifically anticipated by the Iri-101-01. Rev. 5
bases to technical specification 2.1.1.2.
There are no Westinghouse topical reports to the NRC which specify methodology for application to Waterford-3 steam line break transients which specify the use of a 21 kw/ft linear heat rate limit for RTP SLB with No LOOP.
Conclusion :
The only issue to address in this 50.69 evaluation is the use of 24 kw ft
- not that the new analysis results in adverse results.
Entergy letter W3Fl-2004-0096 already addresses the issue concerning that the results of the analysis is more adverse than pre-EPU and gives the LHGR as 22.8 kw/ft vs
. the original value of 20.7 kw,`ft. See revised PUR Section 2.13.1.3,1 attached to letter W3Fl-2004-0096 where it states in section 2.13.1.3.1.6, Analysis Results, "It is seen that the response for the power uprate is slightly more adverse than the current power level. A limited extent of SAFDL violation is seen to occur for these inside containment steam line breaks." Therefore, the NRC is reviewing that issue as part of the submittal.
The issue of fuel centerline melting point is related to a design basis limit for a fission product barrier as described in the FSAR, however, the issue of using the value of 24 kw/ft does not, in itself, result in the exceedance or alteration of this design basis limit. Westinghouse used 24 kw/ft for expediency only.
Westinghouse performed their analysis (CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1) and found that the LHGR was greater than 21 kw/ft (i.e., 22.8kwift). They referred to a calculation they had already performed, 8067-PHR-139, Rev 00 "Return-to-Power Steam Line Break Analysis for Calvert Cliffs Unit 1 Cycle 8," May 23, 1985.
Calculation CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1 Section 4.2 states :
As stated above, in the Calvert Cliffs` calculation they had back calculated what the LHGR would be if fuel centerline melt were to occur; it was on the order of 26 kw/ft. So they said that 24 is less than 26 and 22.8 is less than 24 and therefore fuel centerline melt would not occur.
This comparison of results was to preclude performing the calculation to actually determine what the centerline temperature would be, i.e., it was essentially a short cut As state earlier, in the NRC's Safety Evaluation for Amendment 181 for changing Technical Specification 2.1.1.2 the NRC acknowledges that "While the current Safety Limit of 21 kwlft is exceeded during two AOQs, the peak fuel centerline temperature does not exceed the melting point, which is the true acre tance criteria for this event." Therefore, the true acceptance criteria is fuel centerline temperature does not exceed the melting point.
Therefore, 24 kw/ft is not a new acceptance criteria for WF3 its use was only a expedient method of comparing results from two analysis and determining the there is no fuel centerline melt and is only used for this event.
The results of the analysis for this event following EPU. continues to show that the requirements of Technical Specifications 2.1.1.2 are met.
Therefore, the use of 24 kw/ft is not a change to or result in exceeding a design basis limit for a fission product barrier as described in the FSAR but just the method used for documenting the acceptance criteria (fuel centerline melt temperature not exceeded) was met for the SLB RTP event.
As stated above, the accident response for power uprate is slightly more adverse than the current power level. A limited extent of SAFIOL violation is seen to occur for the inside containment steam line breaks.
This is discussed in revised PUR section 2.13.1.3.1, revised per Attachment 1 to W3Fl-2004-0036 which is supplemental to the EPU LAR NPF-38-249. FSAR Section 15.1.3.1 has been revised to reflect the re-analysis and is in agreement with the EPU LAR.
See response to Question 1 above regarding the relationship and validity of this evaluation to the EPU LI-101-01, Rev. 5 Hand Calculation #6 of 8067-PHR-139, Rev 00 examines the threshold of fuel melting during SLB conditions. Several STRIKIN-II cases were created with conditions mirroring the core conditions (reduced coolant temperatures, etc) at the time of peak return to power for this Calvert Cliffs analysis. It is seen that the threshold of core melting occurred with local conditions consistent with a core power level of 10,700 MWt. As Calvert is a 2700 MWt plant and the average linear hear rate of a Calvert 14x14 assembly is -6.5 KWIFt, the onset of melting is predicted to occur at a linear heat rate of (10,70012,700) 6.5 = 26.7 KW/Ft. Additionally, as the 16x16 fuel rods used at Waterford-3 is of smaller diameter, it will have lower fuel temperature for a given linear heat rate. Thus examination of the Reference 16 work supports the use of a 24 kW/ft as the LHGR limit before melt for SLB accident conditions herein. The use of this figure of merit is limited to the no-LOOP SLB cases.
Page 83 of 83 LAR.
BASIS :
u-101-a1, Rev. 5 o An increase in rated power to 3716 MWt o A reduction in CEA worth at trip The overall re-analysis of this event and the resulting adverse response is being reviewed by the NRC in the EPU LAR, therefore, evaluation of this event is not required under 50.59 to determine if the changes result in a design basis limit for a fission product barrier as described in the FSAR being exceeded or altered and the use of 24 kwlft is not a new acceptance criteria for WF3 its use was only a expedient method of comparing results from two analysis and determining that there is no fuel centerline melt 8.
Result in a departure from a method of evaluation described in the FSAR used in establishing Yes the design bases or in the safety analyses?
No Regarding FSAR Section 15.1.3.1 Steam S stern Pi in Failures Post-Trip. Return-to-Power The method of evaluation previously evaluated in the FSAR is discussed in Section 15.1.3.1, Steam System Piping Failures Post-Trip Return-to-Power. This accident was re-evaluated for EPU in calculation CN-TAS-02-97 Rev 1.
This revised analysis has been submitted to the NRC for review and acceptance via revised PUR section 2.13.1.3.1, included in Attachment 1 to Entergy Letter W3F1-2004-0096 which is supplemental to the EPU LAR NPF-38-249. FSAR Section 15.1.3.1 has been revised to reflect the re-analysis and is in agreement with the EPU LAR, Revised PUR Section 2.13.1.3.1.4, Analysis Overview, states that :
"The methodology used in this analysis is the same as that used in the analysis of record."
It also states that the objective of the main steam line break (MSLB) with or without a concurrent LOOP event re-analysis for EPU was to document the impact of :
o A decrease in the LSGP trip and MSIS actuation setpoints o Transition to the CENTS transient simulation code c Change inmost negative MTC from -4.0x10_4 _,p/°F to-4
.2x10-4 Apf°F The acceptability of using of the CENTS code is part of the EPU LAR submittal. The LAR is currently awaiting NRC approval. See response to Question 1 above regarding the relationship and validity of this evaluation to the EPU LAR.
The re-analysis of this event is being reviewed by the NRC in the EPU LAR, therefore, evaluation of this event is not required under 50.59 to determine if the changes result in a departure from a method of evaluation described in the FSAR used in establishing the design bases or in the safety analyses.
If any of the above questions is checked "YES", obtain NRC approval prior to implementing the change by initiating a change to the Operating License in accordance with NMM Procedure ENS-LI-113.