Text

Engineering Report WF3-CS-12-00003, Attachment G, Rev. 0, Peer Review Checklist for SWEL, Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024, Pages 820 - 1014 of 1014
	ML13120A462
Person / Time
Site:	Waterford
Issue date:	03/25/2013
From:	; Entergy Operations
To:	; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	W3F1-2013-0024 WF3-CS-12-00003
	Download: ML13120A462 (195)
	v • d • e

Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-1 2-00003 Attachment G Rev. 0 Page 1 of 4 Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 820 of1014 Attachment G PEER Review Checklist for SWEL

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 821 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-1 2-00003 Attachment G Rev. 0 Page 2 of 4 Sheet I of 3 Peer Review Checklist for SWEL Instructions for Completing Checklist This peer review checklist may be used to document the review of the Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL) in accordance with EPRI 1025286, Section 6: Peer Review. The space below each question in this checklist should be used to describe any findings identified during the peer review process and how the SWEL may have changed to address those findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Were the five safety functions adequately represented in the SWEL 1 selection?

YZ N[l The SWEL I contains 94 components and addresses all five safety functions. Many components provide safety functions for multiple systems, and/or are part of frontline support systems consistent with the guidelines provided in EPRI Report 1025286, Section 6.2.

2. Does SWEL 1 include an appropriate representation of items having the following sample selection attributes:

a. Various types of systems?

Components included in the SWELl comprise a variety of systems such as Reactivity Control System, Reactor Pressure Control, Reactor Inventory Control, Decay Heat Removal System, Emergency Desiel Generator, Vital A/C and D/C systems.

b. Major new and replacement equipment?

Some New and/or replacement components are included in SWEL 1.

Y[

N[1 YM NEI

c. Various types of equipment?

SWEL I includes at least one example of each of the 21 classes of equipment with the exception of class 13 (Motor Generators). WF3 does not have any Class 13 equipment that is seismic class 1. All classes of equipment are well represented.

In general, the number of components in each class is proportional to the number of safety-related components of that class in the plant as a whole.

YN NEI

Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-1 2-00003 Enclosure to Attachment G W3F1-2013-0024 Rev. 0 Page 822 of'1014 Page 3 of 4 Sheet 2 of 3 Peer Review Checklist for SWEL

d. Various environments?

YE N[l The SWELI contains components in mild, harsh, indoor, and outdoor environments. The components are located in different buildings, rooms, and/or on different builidng elevations. The SWEL 1 also includes components located inside Reactor Building.

e. Equipment enhanced based on the findings of the IPEEE (or equivalent) program?

YE NEl The SWEL1 includes components that were identified during the IPEEE as being potentially vulnerable to a seismic event. This includes adding component 4KVESWGR3B to the SWELl walkdown list since a modification was done to a station air pipe to avoid an interference. For the control room cabinets, all of the bookcases, filing cabinets, etc, in the control room were walked down as part of the area walk-by for other components.

f. Were risk insights considered in the development of SWEL 1?

YE Nil[

SWEL 1 includes high risk components based on risk significance in the plant Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) models.

3. For SWEL 2:

a. Were spent fuel pool related items considered, and if applicable included in YN N[]

SWEL 2?

SWEL 2 includes components for maintaining cooling of the SFP, which are Seismic Category I components.

b. Was an appropriate justification documented for spent fuel pool related items not YO No included in SWEL 2?

Justification was provided in the Process used to determine the SWEL 2 listing for WF3

Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-1 2-00003 Attachment G Rev. 0 Page 4 of 4 Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 823 of1014 Sheet 3 of 3 Peer Review Checlist for,,SWEL

4. Provide any other comments (Aftchment 9.11) related to the poe review of the SWELs.

Thn peer rewew teem rebiwed the kitda SWEL e.and SWEL 2 and prvided conmwts and suggesftbns tor mwd on of the SWELL Conwt kcuded suggeLsn to acW component awsoated wfth the MRe that were Identfted In WF3 iPEEE Rued scope Seismic.Mergt Assesynent Report4 should be Included b the SWEL 1 so that a ivaik dawvs can, be conducted an.these equiornnt to Confrum Mtha mod~fiation have been. complete t? resole these. concerns YM. NO

5. Have all peer review comments been adequately addMssed In the fin.SWEL?

0-4#4 LJ-W1 fý--f 6:4I DaW.

A/

DoW.

F PmRw*ww:#2: Se-d-A Invis

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 824 of'1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment H Rev. 0 Page 1 of 14 Attachment H Peer Review Comment Form Table 1 - SWEL Review Table 2 - SWC/AWC Review Table 3 - LBE Review

Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment H Rev. 0 Page 2 of 14 Table 1 - SWEL Review

-0E CDC CD Seismic Walkdown Submittal Report Review Comments and Resolutions Form Engineering WF3-CS-12-00003 Rev.

Title:

WF3 SWEL 1 and SWEL 2 Report Number I

Quality Related: :] Yes Z No Special Notes or Instructions:

Comment Section/Page Review Comment Response/Resolution Reviewer's Number No.

SWELl COMMENTS Accept Initials 1

S.R equipment How did you determine whether or not the component is The two items described in the Review HG 10-23-12 spread sheet "Undergoes Regular Configuration Inspections" under Comment #1 are both pools inside our column Screen 2? The BL indicates the all components RAB. These are considered structures, are NOT Undergo Regular Configuration Inspections with not equipment. However, they are the exception of 2 that are (those are SI MPOLO001 and inspected as part of our Maintenance CMUMPOL0001). Is this true? I looked in Asset Suite, Rule for Structures in procedure EN-DC-under PMID for these two components; it indicates that the 150. If you look at this procedure and PM tasks for these two components have been RETIRED?

look at the equipment for WF3, the RWSP and the CSP are both listed separately in the list. The PM tasks were RETIRED, but new tasks are being created now. The creation of these tasks is being tracked in CR-WF3-2011-08140 I

CA 25.

2 S.R equipment Screen 1 Column should be filled in either "Yes" or "No" for Corrected.

HG 10-23-12 spread sheet whether the component is Seismic Cat. 1 or not.

3 S.R equipment Screen 4, under Temperature and Humidity column should Corrected.

HG 10-23-12 spread sheet be filled in either "T" for High Temp. or "H" for Hi Humidity of "T, H" for both conditions.

4 S.R equipment Please refer to procedure EN-DC-168, Rev. 0, Attachment Corrected.

HG 10-23-12 spread sheet 9.4, Table 9.4.1 for format and instructions to fill out Base List 1.

5 Table 9.4.2 Column titles do not match Attachment 9.4 of procedure Corrected.

HG 10-23-12 EN-DC-168, Rev. 0, Table 9.4.2. Additional columns are ok for additional information but should be hidden or moved such that the final table will have all columns match the Table in the procedure. (i.e. The Table should only

Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment H Rev. 0 Page 3 of 14 Table I - SWEL Review no 0D WD 0 N)

T-0 0

have one Environment column, and the two untitled columns to the right of Equipment ID do not need to be part of this Table).

6 Table 9.4.2 Drawings for each component need to be provided in the Drawings provided.

HG 10-23-12 appropriate column.

7 Table 9.4.2 The first column, the SWEL number should be "SWELl-Corrected.

HG 10-23-12 001". The "1" after SWEL was missing.

8 Table 9.4.2 Under System Type column, it would be helpful if the Corrected.

HG 10-23-12 systems identified Asset Suite is provided for the associated components in the SWEL 1.

9 Table 9.4.2 Are there reasons for not including two classes of This has been corrected. Class 12 was See additional Equipment (class 12 - Air Compressor and 13 - Motor added to the list. WF3 does not have any comment.

Generators)?

Class 13 equipment that is seismic class 1.

Need to add class 12 to items SWELl-095 and 096.

Incorporated.

HG 10-24-12 10 Table 9.4.2 Does the SWEL 1 include any equipment enhanced based No. WF3 did not have to do any See additional on the findings of the IPEEE.

equipment modifications due to IPEEE.

comment.

Page 3-45 of the WF3 IPEEE Reduced scope Seismic Added 4KVESWGR3B to the SWELl HG 10-23-12 Margins Assessment Report, Section 3.1.6 identifies some walkdown list since a modification was CRs for resolution of outlier concerns (CR-94-1019 and done to a station air pipe to avoid an CR-94-1 111), the components associated with these CRs interference. For the control room should be included in the SWELl so that a walk down can cabinets, all of the bookcases, filing be conducted on these equipment to confirm that cabinets, etc, in the control room were modifications have been completed to resolve these walked down as part of the area walk-by concerns.

for other components. This would be all of the items from our IPEEE.

11 Table 9.4-2 Under Column "ROOM/COL" several column lines are Corrected. The location identifications SD 10-23-12 missing, e.g. SWEL-002, 212/10A-? SWEL-018 "421/?",

came directly from Asset Suite as shown.

SWEL-019 "420/?", SWEL-061 "?/9A-1, SWEL-084 However, the column lines were "304/9A-? etc. Complete the missing information, removed. Some items do not have any rooms or columns identified as they are not identified in Asset Suite.

12 Table 9.4-2 The anchorage configuration verification is not provided in Corrected.

SD 10-23-12

Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-1 2-00003 Attachment H Rev. 0 Page 4 of 14 Table 1 - SWEL Review Column "ANC" for any of the equipment. Enter "Yes" or "No" as applicable.

13 S.R equipment spread sheet Item # 14 requires "X" in the applicable safety function supported by the equipment in lieu of "Yes" or "No".

The spread sheet is no longer being used. The Word file is now being used for the full table.

I 4

4 14 S.R equipment spread sheet What column "None" after "Support" column stands for?

The spread sheet is no longer being used. The Word file is now being used for the full table. However, the column "None" was being used to show equipment that did not meet any of the 5 system functions.

This has now been changed and the function in the 5 system functions is not checked.

15 S.R equipment What is the title of column for abbreviations GE, JJ, DC, These are the initials of the team SD 10-23-12 spread sheet DM etc?

members that helped document the 5 safety functions. If one of the individuals stated that they believed that piece of equipment met one of the functions, then their initials were added to that list.

However, the spread sheet is no longer being used. The Word file is now being used for the full table.

SWEL 2 COMMENTS

Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-1 2-00003 Attachment H Rev. 0 Page 5 of 14 Table I - SWEL Review CDo OD U) r')

C 00j 0~

16 Table 9.4.4 Inclusion of pipe on the RDD list is different than other Because of the way the piping is HG 10-23-$*

plants in the industry, connected to the fuel pool at WF3, the

" We (ENERCON) are awaiting a response to a lines that are included could result in a question posed to the NEI Seismic Task Force.

rapid drain down. The water in the pool

Periodic inspection on piping should be confirmed.

could get to right at the top of the fuel

" Keep the documentation of walkdowns completed of assemblies in the pool.

the piping system.

Final decision for inclusion on the RDD will be made pending resolution of the above.

17 Tables 9.4.3 and Per procedure EN-DC-168, page 48 of 80 item 34 states:

Corrected.

HG 10-23-12 9.4.4 "Format the corresponding BS2 and RDD line item to be selected for SWEL2 as bold in Tables 9.4.3 and 9.4.4".

Please bold the items that were selected for SWEL2 in Tables 9.4.3 and 9.4.4. The same should apply for SWELl as well (items selected for SWELl should be bolded in Table 9.4.1).

18 Table 9.4.3 Need to add components for SWEL2-012, 013 and 014 (FS Corrected.

HG 10-23-12 EMTR314A 5M, FS EMTR314B 5M, and FS EMTR314B 6F respectively) to the Base List 2 (Table 9.4.3).

19 Table 9.4.3 Please fill in the "TRAIN" column for components that have These items do not have the train defined HG 10-23-12 train specific based on Equipment ID (i.e. items 2006, in Asset Suite. The ones that are 2007, 2010, 2019-2029.... )

completed are directly from Asset Suite.

20 Table 9.4.5 Last column "RDD", should replace "N/A" with "N" and the No changes are required.

I withdraw this last 5 items should be "Y".

comment. The column is OK as is.

HG 10-23-12

Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment H Rev. 0 Page 6 of 14 Table I - SWEL Review

-0*

0 (o

21 Table 9.4.5 All SWEL Numbers SWEL2-001 thru SWEL2-005 are The three FS breakers are 100 amp SD 10-23-12V4" identified as CKTBRK under Equipment ID Column. SWEL frame breakers and are located inside a Numbers SWEL2-004 and SWEL2-005 are listed as Class motor control center. The two CC 14 while SWEL2-001 thru SWEL001 thru SWEL2-003 and breakers are both 5 amp breakers and several other are listed as Class 1. Clarify the distinction, are located inside a power distribution panel.

22 Table 9.4.5 Under Equipment Column, Equipment IDs are listed which This is the way our IDs are presented in SD 10-23-12 are consistent with AS. What are the additional subsets, Asset Suite. There are no subtitles for i.e. 5D, 5M, 6F and CKTBRK etc.? Provide subtitles for these two columns. Having them in 3 these two columns.

columns makes it easier to find the equipment, plus makes it easier to enter and read. This is a presentation preference and the grid lines will not be I_

visible in the final document.

23 Table 9.4.3 Under Equipment Column, Equipment IDs are listed which See response to comment 22.

SD 10-23-12 are consistent with AS. What are the additional subsets, i.e. 10F, 5D, 5M, 6F and CKTBRK etc.? Provide subtitles for these two columns.

Reviewed By:

Heidi Graf / Sada Dhingra Date 1 10/24/12 Resolved By:

G. N. Fer uson Site/Department:

ENERCON/MECH Ph.770-792-6936 Date:

Ph. 504-739-6538 I /916-293-9801

Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-1 2-00003 Attachment H Rev. 0 Page 7 of 14 Table 2 - SWC/AWC Review o)

CD 0~

Seismic Walkdown Submittal Report

'c Entergy Review Comments and Resolutions Form Engineering WF3-CS-12-00003 Rev.

I Title Report Number WF3 Seismic Walkdown Submittal Report - SWCs and AWCs Quality Related: [J Yes Z No Special Notes or Instructions:

Comment Section/Page No.

Review Comment Response/Resolution Reviewer's Number Accept Initials 1

General, Where potential conditions are identified, it would be CRs and WRs written have been BDK SWC+AWC highly beneficial to include CR numbers generated (as included in all SWCs and AWCs.

available). This assists with cross-referencing.

2

General, If comments include miscellaneous issues (i.e., missing If the condition was deemed seismically BDK SWC+AWC clips, housekeeping issues, etc.), the "other seismic insignificant, the question was marked condition" question should be marked "N" unless "Y" it was clearly stated that there was disposition of conditions are included. This is true for no seismic concern.

any identified condition - either mark "N" or provide justification/disposition that identified condition is seismically insignificant.

3

General, Anytime "N/A" is marked, a brief explanation/justification All N/A items now have an explanation of BDK SWC+AWC should be provided. (For line-mounted items with why it has been marked that way.

common justification for anchorage questions, can be provided once on SWC). This includes anchorage, flexibility of lines, etc.

4 General, SWC SWC Questions 2-4 require response, even if answer is All SWCs now have a response in BDK "Y" to include brief description (see EN-DC-168 Att. 9.6 questions 2-4.

p. 7). This could include general description of hardware condition, overall configuration, corrosion, etc. (including for line-mounted items), specific to each question.

5 General, SWC SWC Question 5 should include the document number Document number has been included BDK I used to evaluate the configuration (if Q. 1 is "Y"), and along with brief discussion.

_I_

I

Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment H Rev. 0 Page 8 of 14 Table 2 - SWC/AWC Review (D -,

0, CD o8-60 6

7 8

9 10 General, SWC SWELl -003 General, SWC AWC-014 SWELl-008 should include a brief description of the results of that evaluation (see. EN-DC-168 Att. 9.6 p. 7)

Question 6 should be answered, regardless of the responses to Questions 1-5. If an inline component without anchorage, can indicate "Y" and add note of "Inline component - N/A" or similar.

Question 3 is marked "N" due to "mild corrosion" although the Question 6 is marked "Y". Question 6 is asking for an aggregate response to all anchorage questions (i.e., mark "N" if at least one of 2-5 is marked "N"). If the "mild corrosion" is judged insignificant, that should be explained in Question 2, and should be marked as "Y". If the "mild corrosion" is not insignificant, then Question 6 should be "N".

Please confirm that all cabinet/panel doors were opened (i.e., MCC cubicles). If not, the SWC should include justification for how the goals of the inspection are still being met without opening the cabinet (see FAQ 4.20),

or should be marked as incomplete pending deferral to when the cabinets will be able to be opened (i.e.,

outage).

Adding notes/comments to reference photos to identified conditions would be helpful, especially since multiple conditions are identified.

Questions 7 and 8 are marked "N" but include no explanation. Add explanation of conditions. Include photo of each condition identified.

Question 6 has been answered for all SWCs.

If question 1-5 has been checked "No,"

question 6 will be checked "No" for all SWCs.

In all cases, if a SWEL item involving a panel or cabinet could not have all of its doors opened, then it was deferred until the next available time that all doors could be opened. If the SWEL item was not deferred then, all doors were opened unless otherwise explicitly stated on the SWC.

Comment Incorporated.

BDK BDK BDK BDK BDK A.

I A.

Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-1 2-00003 Attachment H Rev. 0 Page 9 of 14 Table 2 - SWC/AWC Review

-U*

(0C) a (D70 0Dr.)(

. L-1 11 12 13 14 SWELl-010 SWELl-012 AWC-002 AWC-042 Is oil/fluid leak under pump not an "other seismic condition" for answering Question 11 with "N"? How was the leak addressed when identified?

Photo shows pump foundation anchor very close to column baseplate anchor. Is this anchor spacing acceptable?

Photo of "tubes lying around" would be helpful. Is this flex tube, or something more substantial?

Area walk-by identified water pooling at base of pipe support. Is this strut support baseplate intended to be recessed below slab surface?

This was previously identified in CR-WF3-2011-05119 and WR-243506 and has been stated in the comments section of the SWC.

Yes it is acceptable.

These were only flex tubes. They posed no seismic concern and have been stated as such on the SWC.

This was discussed with site engineers and determined to be acceptable.

BDK BDK BDK BDK Reviewed By:

T Benjamin D. Kosbab I Date 10/8/12 Resolved B :

Brian Pace Site/Department:

ENERCON/Civil Ph. 770-590-2179 1 Date:

11-09-2012

Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment H Rev. 0 Page 10 of 14 Table 2 - SWC/AWC Review CI)w 00 Seismic Walkdown Submittal Report O

.ntergy Review Comments and Resolutions Form Engineering WF3-CS-12-00003 Rev.

I Title Report Number WF3 Seismic Walkdown Submittal Report - SWCs and AWCs Quality Related: E] Yes Z No Special Notes or Instructions:

Comment Section/Page No.

Review Comment Response/Resolution Reviewer's Number Accept Initials 1

SWELl-082 Question 5: Provide the document number used to Comment Incorporated.

MPW confirm anchorage configuration (dwg G574S05?)

2 SWELl -082 Question 9: Add note as to why flexibility of attached A drawing that specifies the use of rigid MPW lines is N/A.

connections has been identified and referenced on the SWCs that identified rigid connections.

3 SWELI-087 Provide justification for N/A items. Please confirm Comment Incorporated.

MPW cabinet was opened to inspect internals and weld conditions; from N/A responses and photo, it is not evident that the intent of NRC Guidance 4.20 for opening cabinets. Welds (including internal) still need to be checked as "anchorage" for adverse conditions, corrosion, etc. Need to answer question 6 especially to come to a firm conclusion.

4 SWELl-087 Question 8: Answer says yes, but statement about All fluorescent lights have been changed MPW fluorescent lights is open ended. Need to have firm to non-seismic concerns. It was conclusion for 'Y' that cages are not needed or marked determined after extensive conversation as 'U' until verification is complete, at which point 'Y' or with site personnel that falling bulbs

'N' could be firmly justified.

could not impact equipment in the area.

No bulbs were present over sensitive relays for example. SWCs or AWCs that identified florescent lights still have discussion about them on its respective checklist, but include a statement saying I EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment H Rev. 0 Page 11 of 14 Table 2 - SWC/AWC Review CD _0 0 w -r 6

I 5

6 7

8 9

10 11 12 13 14 SWELl-087 SWELl-089 SWELl-089 SWELl-016 AWC-005 (SWEL-016, -040, -089)

AWC-023 (SWEL-090)

SWELl-092 SWELl-092 SWELl-092 AWC-006 Question 9: Add note as to why flexibility of attached lines is N/A. Photo appears to show vertical conduits entering panel.

Provide justification for N/A items. See comments regarding SWEL1-087. Justify N/A for attached lines.

Question 11 and general: If you conclude that there are no other seismic conditions, then you need to make it clear that the missing insulation cover bolt, missing insulation clips, and mild corrosion are not a seismic concern.

See generic comment regarding question 6. Make a firm conclusion in the 'Comments' section that there is no seismic impact with the corrosion noted.

What is the overall conclusion regarding all the comments identified (i.e., seismic concerns)? See Kosbab general comments.

Make a firm conclusion regarding comments.

Add reference document to Question 5.

Explain N/A for Question 7 (either conclude 'Y' or explain there are no soft targets with 'N/A').

Explain reasoning for N/A for flexibility of attached lines (piping connections only, or piping is per design)

See generic comments regarding 'Comments'.

that failing bulbs pose no seismic concern for the equipment in the area.

See resolution to comment #2 above.

Comment Incorporated.

These are not seismic concerns. They have been identified however with CRs and WRs as well.

Comment Incorporated.

MPW MPW MPW MPW MPW MPW MPW MPW MPW MPW 10 11 12 13 14 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment H Rev. 0 Page 12 of 14 Table 2 - SWC/AWC Review

-UEm W ) C oc..)

6 F

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 (SWELl-092)

SWELl-094 AWC-021 (SWELl-094)

SWELl-044 SWELl-044 SWELl-060 AWC-010 SWELl-066 See generic comments regarding N/A's for welded connections (Q2 and Q3), no answer for Q6, and open question related to fluorescent light (Q8).

See general comment (SWEL1-087 comments on question 8) regarding fluorescent light.

For valves and in-line components, it would be helpful to mention in Q5 and/or Q6 that the item is line-mounted to support your N/As. It is also valuable to apply the guidance in EN-DC-168, "Anchorage" and "Other Adverse Conditions" to a general inspection of flange bolts, exposed connections, etc. and note the condition found. See general comments regarding mild corrosion statement.

See comment above regarding N/As for valves and various connections of valve components. Need firm conclusion on corrosion issue.

Was the entire fan assembly inspected? Give justification for N/A responses.. components appear to be bolted to structure. Photo shows flexible cables coming into fan motor, so please review N/A response to Q9.

Is the identified "moderate-severe corrosion" a problem?

Check the status box on first page. Explain any N/A responses, specifically attached line flexibility question..

Were connections of AHU to support steel evaluated from ladder or platform?

Welded connection questions have been answered with either "Y" or "N" on all checklists. See comment resolution #4 above for fluorescent lights.

Comment Incorporated.

Identified as no seismic concern and a WR has been initiated.

Comment Incorporated. Conditions were observed from the floor.

MPW MPW MPW MPW MPW MPW MPW

.1.

.1. _____________________________________________________

I

.1.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment H Rev. 0 Page 13 of 14 Table 2 - SWC/AWC Review 0

CD 22 23 24 25 26 27 AWC-004 (SWELl -066)

SWELl-069 SWELl-070 SWELl-070 SWELl-071 SWELl -072 Large displacement of lights during seismic event still needs to be verified, but all answers are 'Y'. Need to change to a 'U or have a firm conclusion.

What is the conclusion with the bolts that were not completely visually inspected?

Wraparound bracing and spacers need to exist for individual batteries to ensure they fit snugly in their position.

Are the area block walls seismically qualified (IE Bulletin 80-11)?

Provide reference for Question 5. What is the conclusion with lights in vicinity (Q8)?

Provide reference for Question 5. What is the conclusion with fluorescent liahts (Q8)?

See comment resolution #4 above.

Comment resolved.

Yes. This has been confirmed with site documentation.

See comment resolution #4 above.

MPW MPW MPW MPW MPW MPW I

I h

Reviewed By:

I Matt Wilkinson I Date 10/8/12 Resolved By:

Brian Pace Site/Department:

ENERCON Ph.

I Date:

1 11-09-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-1 2-00003 Attachment H Table 3 - LBE Review Page 14 014

-0::E CD C N) Cý

=0 0

Seismic Walkdown Submittal Report

- Ent&g Review Comments and Resolutions Form Engineering WF3-CS-12-00003 Rev. 0

Title:

WF3 LBEs Report Number I

Quality Related: LI Yes Z No Special Notes or Instructions:

Comment Section/Page Review Comment Response/Resolution Reviewer's Number No.

Accept Initials 1

General, The first step of an LBE, per EPRI Guidance Section 5, is LBE "Licensing Basis" summaries have BK 11-15-12 LBE to determine the current licensing basis for the plant as it been revised for clarity where possible, relates to the seismic adequacy of the equipment.

concisely stating the contextual licensing Specifically, this should be done in the context of the basis to allow the "Evaluation" to identified potentially adverse seismic condition being transparently conclude whether the evaluated. In several cases, this summarized "Licensing licensing basis is met or not.

Basis" in the LBEs could be improved for clarity of intent.

2

General, Recall that the LBE tool is specific for the NTTF 2.3:

Use of the LBE tool has been adjusted to BK 11-15-12 LBE Seismic program, and is intended to document whether better align with EPRI Guidance Section existing documentation regarding the plant licensing basis

5. Formal LBEs are documented for provides justification for acceptance of potentially adverse those conditions which do not require seismic conditions identified in the field. Documentation of CAP entry.

SWE judgment about whether a condition is potentially seismically significant or not is not an appropriate use of the LBE tool; rather, use of judgment should be documented on the SWC/AWC forms based on SWE discussion in the field. Disposition and eventual resolution of conditions not justified by an LBE should be done through the plant CAP to ensure appropriate tracking/trending and extent-of-condition evaluations I (where necessary).

I Reviewed By:

Ben Kosbab Date 10/30/12 Resolved By:

Dinesh Patel Site/Department:

ENERCON/CIVIL Ph.770-590-2179 Date: 11/12/12 Ph. 770-792-6975

Attachment J Enclosure to Rev. 0 W3F1-2013-0024 Page 1 of 15 Page 838 of1O14 Attachment J Seismic Walkdown EnQineering Training Certificates

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 839 of1014

-Attachment J Rev. 0 Page 2 of 15 Seismic Walkdown Engqineers Dinesh Patel Brian Pace Chu-Chieh (Jay) Lin Natalie George Greg Ferguson Stephen Picard

Anacnment u Rev. 0 Page 3of 15

-D m m-9 o 6

-. )

E.3 ENERCON

[ x:e-,

1e-e-Every proie( ! [ very day.

Certificate of Completion is hereby granted to Dinesh Patel for successful completion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS Awarded: 7/11/2012 in Kennesaw, GA Kevin Bessell Kenneth Whitmore Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Palo Alto, CA - 6/13/2012 Alexandria, VA - 6/20/2012

AUacnmenz J Rev. 0 Pager4iof15 omp t 0 n

-",0 0

D00 0ENERCON Excellen~ce-Every projec Ever d&y Certificate of Completion is hereby granted to Brian Pace for successful c6mpletion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS August 22,2012 - Kennesaw, GA Date - Location Kursat Iinall, Ph.D., P.E.

EPRI Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Alexandria, VA - 7/27/2012

Attachment J Rev. 0 Page 5 of 15

-oEm

,_oS MCD

$00 Certificate of Completion CHU-CHIEH LIN Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3

- Plant Seismic Walkdowns July 27, 2012

/t).

Dlle Robed K. Kauawrs EPRI Mw"w.

Struchual Rewbty & kftsgdt MEESE

AUacnmeni J Rev. 0 Pager6foft15

-0 *p t CD 0 W OENERCON Excellence-Every Project Every day.

Certificate of Completion is hereby granted to Natalie George for succesful completion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS August 22, 2012 - Kennesaw, GA Date - Location Kursat Khn"l Ph.D., P.E.

EPRI Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Akexandnia, VA - 7/27/ 2012

Antacniment J Rev. 0 Page 7 of 15

. 0 0

C)

N) 1=

BEiCTRIC POWER m I~f2I RfES4RCH INS ITUI Certificateof Completion Greg Ferguson Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3

= Plant Seismic Walkdowns

/f. ý.0 441ýý June 21, 2012 Date Robert K. Kassawara EPRI Manager, Structural Reliability & Integrity

Mrtacnmenl i Rev. 0 Page 8ofl 15-0*M 20 0

I4~

1=

EtI.CtRIC POWER I~r2I RESEARCH N51TUTL~E Certificate of Completion Stephen Picard Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3

- Plant Seismic Walkdowns July 27, 2012 Ifoe. 44oýý Date Robert K. Kassawara EPRI Manager, Structural Reliability & Integrity

Attachment J Enclosure to Rev. 0 W3F1-2013-0024 Page 9 of 15 Page 846 ofO114 Seismic Walkdown Peer Reviewers Ben Kosbab Matthew Wilkinson

AUacnment J Rev. 0 PageCetiic 1

of 15 N NCR 40@

00WE

-6 EM ENENRCON

,( of'Ilc~e -Et--tV'ey p'Qe. f very> day Certificate of Completion is hereby granted to Benjam--in Kosbab for successful completion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS Awarded: 7/11/2012 in Kennesaw, GA in Bessell Kenneth Whitmore Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Palo Alto, CA - 6/13/2012 Alexandria, VA - 6/20/2012

~~4Th

.4

-~

~

N

-~

44

~

4-,

~

~'-,

-~

4""-

"-4 A'*'*

~

"A~.

-A

~

'4 "4

-"-c "4

ENERCON Excellence-Every project. Every day.

Certificate of Completion is hereby granted to Matt Wilkinson for successful completion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 Aaacnment J Rev. 0 Page 11 of 15

-OEm C'):

CD 0

4N, C CD 0 k:4" 1 0 "1 U

.:?.".

.; ];:.:.*4 e

PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS

'4."

AN

"-4">

.~ -~-c-.4~4-'4

.4' 1,1 Awarded: 7/26/2012 in Mt. Arlington, NJ

W

.-'4'.;-:.:

Kenneth Whitmore Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Alexandria, VA-6/20/2012

..'f**

7

.``:?*

A'`...`., *m

` y`F`t`'*

`*** ***,`**

.*`:`

'4,.L.!:

".4..

`,

-4*:`1`

U.S *:.`;

``.*.,.:)*7

` `.

'-'*4!*

"*.!*:;%2".

",N>-'.-

4/

t***`**:<*

b :W5; i<-:*:,:L;,*:

% st..*

N N,,

,- -,+'..*:/*-****.?b;-.7.

L<:'*

.. L**.

'.jr.

.!.c'.

.- ;.-x t

Attachment J Rev. 0 Enclosure to Page 12 of 15 W3F1-2013-0024 Page 849 of1014 EPRI-Qualified SWE Trainers Kevin Bessell Kursat Kinali Ken Whitmore

Anacnmeni J Rev. 0 Page 13of 15

-0 m

,o (a

01 ci) 0(31 I..,i.

l ELECTRIC POWER S.

RESEARCH INSTITUTE Certificate of Completion Kevin Bessell Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3

= Plant Seismic Walkdowns June 13, 2012 i

Date Robert K. Kassawara EPRI Manager, Structural Reliability & Integrity r

Auacnment J Rev. 0 Page14of15

-0

_m If Certificate of Completion 00 Kursat Kinali Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3

- Plant Seismic Walkdowns Juy 27, 2012 Date Robed K. Kasawara EPRI Maniee.

stiumW Rdabifty & ktWft

Atacnment J Rev. 0 p~a 1; nf 1 "t *M Certificate of Completion Kenneth Whitmore Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3

- Plant Seismic Walkdowns JD -no (A0s C)0 00 June 21, 2012

,&I/

r. A44020460-O.-

Dabe Robed K. KanaWara EPRI MuWg",

6kucbiWd Ralab~y & kftgty

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 853 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000 Attachment Iý Revision 1 Page 1 of 9z Attachment K Seismic Walkdown Checklists (SWCs)

Revision 1 See Attachment C for Revision 0 SWCs

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 854 of 1014 Lngineering Report No. WI-3-U;-12-UUU03 Attachment K Revision 1 Page 2 of 94 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: Y[

Nt] Ut]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-002 Equipment ID No.

SSDEMCC311B Equip. Class' Motor Control Centers and Wall-Mounted Contactors Equipment Description Motor Control Center 311B Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. +21 Room, Area 212 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

ITE / Gould Model 5640V4 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[

Nt]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

0 MCC is connected by welds to embedded plate. Drawings 1564-3187 and G344 S02 show the weld details.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

0 There is no corrosion visible on the bottom of the MCC or on the welds and embedded plates.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

There are no visible cracks in the concrete around the embedded plates.

Y[Z Nt] Ut] N/A[]

YN NEI Ut] N/At Y[

NEI Ut-] N/A[]

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 855 of1014

-ngineering Kepon i'1o. vvr-6-t-Io-uuuu Attachment I Revision Page 3 of 9 ATTACHMENT 9.6 Sheet 2 of 5 SEISMIC WALKOOWN CHECKLIST FORM Status: Y[

NFIl UFi-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-002 Equipment ID No.

SSDEMCC31 1 B Equip. Class Motor Control Centers and Wall-Mounted Contactors Equipment Description Motor Control Center 311B

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YZ NiU U-- N/AU]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

MCC is connected by welds to embedded plate. Drawings 1564-3187 and G344 S02 show the weld details.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEIl UI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Questions 2-4 satisfied.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Two conduits were found to be -1/4" from the west end of the SSDEMCC31 1B. It was determined that the MCC will not move enough to strike the conduits so there is no interaction concern. See page 5 of 5 of this Seismic Walkdown Checklist for the determination of the movement for the MCC.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Conduits are rigidly attached to the top of SSDEMCC31 1B in accordance with drawing B288, Sheet 19-1.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Questions 7-9 satisfied.

YN NE] U0] N/AU YZ NEI] u-N/AU YZ NEi u[-] N/AU YZ NEI UE]

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 856 of1014 ATTACHMENT 9.6 Sheet 3 of 5 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Status: YZ NFD U-i Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELI-002 Equipment ID No.

SSDEMCC311B B Equip. Class Motor Control Centers and Wall-Mounted Contactors Equipment Description Motor Control Center 311 B Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[

NO UI-Z adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

For area walk-by checklist, see AWC-018.

One of two knurled knobs on a metal cover between cubicles 5 and 6 of SSDEMCC3I B could not be tightened. This metal cover is hinged on one side with two knobs to hold it in place. The cover is a narrow strip going almost the entire height of the MCC and covers wires. CR-WF3-2012-06180 written to document this condition. This will not impact the seismic qualification of the MCC or any of the components inside it.

Evaluated by: Grego N. Ferguson Stephen Picard

,*_ -/ U Date:

/4b EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 857 ofl 014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000 Attachment I Revision Page 5 of 9 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[

NEIl UF)

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-002 Equipment ID No.

SSDEMCC311B Equip. Class Motor Control Centers and Wall-Mounted Contactors Equipment Description Motor Control Center 311B Photographs Note: Conduits adjacent to west end of SSDEMCC311 B.

Note: View of internals of SI EBKR31 1 B 15C inside SSDEMCC311 B.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000 Enclosure to Attachment I W3F1-2013-0024 Revision Page 858 of1014 Page 6 of 9 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NEI ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-002 Equipment ID No.

SSDEMCC311B Equip. Class Motor Control Centers and Wall-Mounted Contactors Equipment Description Motor Control Center 311 B Discussion of Seismic Displacement of SSDEMCC31 1 B Conduits 32563B5-NB and 32563B6-NB were found to be approximately 1/4 inch from SSDEMCC31 1 B (see attached photo). According to EPRI Seismic walkdown guidance this is a seismic proximity interaction concern because of the potential impact on the panel due to relative motion during seismic excitation. The relays/contactors/starters located in the panel are prone to 'chatter,' and could potentially be impacted.

The information below comes from EPRI NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Training Course and justifies the acceptability of the condition by showing the conduit and panel will not contact each other during a seismic event.

Sa - RSd+A a Where So= Seismic dleTcemeril R -

Particftrio factor Sd -

Spectral dSPWCnM S,(38.4)

(Mn)

(2rd, 2 AS = Support d*pcent fg

= Natural frequency of support (Hz)

S8 -

Specrl accelemtron at support frequency (infVA)

Deflection of the panel R = 1.57 (For a cantilever beam, which is what the panel acts like)

A-= 0 in Sas = 0.4 g (Design Basis Earthquake acceleration for +21 Reactor Auxiliary Building) f, = 8 Hz (Natural Frequency of Panel per SQ-E-2)

Sd (0.4 g (386.4))

(2xrx8) 2 Ss =1.57 x (0.4 g (386.4))

(2 x r x 8)2 Ss = 0.096 in Deflection of the conduit Conservatively assume the conduits have similar deflection. This is conservative because the panel that the conduits are attached to has more rigid mounting with 4 inch steel channels, which are welded to the floor, restraining the panel on both sides.

So, conservatively assume both the panel and conduits deflect 0.096 in.

0.096 x 2 = 0.192 in < 0.250 in Therefore, there is no contact between the panel and conduits and this condition is satisfied.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 859 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment K Revision 1 Page 7 of 94 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 6 Status: YO NO Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-004 Equipment ID No.

CEDEBKR3918-B Equip. Classi Low Voltage Switchgears and Breaker Panels Equipment Description REACTOR TRIP SWGR BREAKER TCB-2 COMPARMENT 2C Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. +21 Room, Area Room 212, Col. 8A, Line K Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

General Electric Co., AK2-25-2 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage was looked at underneath the one cubicle for this breaker and found to be satisfactory. However, not every cubicle on this panel was able or needed to be opened for this inspection.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

No corrosion was seen.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

YE-I NN*

YZ N[-] U-- N/All YE NO UI-- N/Al]

YZ NDI U-] N/ADl Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 860 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000' Attachment I1 Revision,

Page 8 of 91 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YE NE ! ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-004 Equipment ID No.

CEDEBKR3918-B Equip. Class Low Voltage Switchciears and Breaker Panels Equipment Description REACTOR TRIP SWGR BREAKER TCB-2 COMPARMENT 2C

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YOI NO-UFi-N/As (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[

NEI uFI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All overhead and adjacent equipment was securely supported. The masonry block wall behind the CED breaker panel is an engineered wall, is reinforced, and shows no signs of degradation.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Conduits do not have flexible connections on top of the panel.

However, this is the design installation for Waterford 3 as shown on drawing B288, sheet 19-1.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YN NEI U-I N/A[!

YZ NEI uI N/AO YZ NE!I UE N/AU YZ NE! UOI EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 864, @fM04 ATTACHMENT 9.6 Sheet 3 of 6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Status: YZ NED UI--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-004 Equipment ID No.

CEDEBKR3918-B Equip. Class Low Voltage Switchqears and Breaker Panels Equipment Description REACTOR TRIP SWGR BREAKER TCB-2 COMPARMENT 2C Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI] UI]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A WC-019 applies to the area walk-by for this particular component.

No issues were found in this component.

Evaluated by: Gregory N. Fe uson Stephen Picard Date:

Ls 2 I/

/S EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 862 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000:

Attachment I Revision '

Page 10 of 91 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 6 Status: YN NEI Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-004 Equipment ID No.

CEDEBKR3918-B Equip. Class Low Voltage Switchgears and Breaker Panels Equipment Description REACTOR TRIP SWGR BREAKER TCB-2 COMPARMENT 2C Photographs Note: View inside front of breaker cubicle.

Note: View in lower left of breaker cubicle.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 863 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00=0" Attachment Revision Page 11 of 9g ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 6 Status: YN NO ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-004 Equipment ID No.

CEDEBKR3918-B Equip. Class Low Voltage Switchqears and Breaker Panels Equipment Description REACTOR TRIP SWGR BREAKER TCB-2 COMPARMENT 2C Photographs Note: View of outside of front of breaker cubicle with equipment label.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3FI-2013-0024 Page 864 ofl 014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment K Revision 1 Page 12 of 94 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 6 of 6 Status: YM NEI U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-004 Equipment ID No.

CEDEBKR3918-B Equip. Class Low Voltage Switchaears and Breaker Panels Equipment Description REACTOR TRIP SWGR BREAKER TCB-2 COMPARMENT 2C Photographs Note: View on floor of rear of breaker cubicle.

Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 865 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-1 2-0000:

Attachment I Revision Page 13 of 9.

ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 6 Status: YZ NEI U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-006 Equipment ID No.

4KVESWGR3A Equip. Class' Medium Voltage, Metal-Clad Switchqear

-OR-SWGR-3A3S Equipment Description Switchqear 3A Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. +21 Room, Area 212A, Column 9A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

General Electric, Co., AM4163502H Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[:] NE

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

YZ NEI UD-N/AEl YR NE] UrI N/A[]

Y0 NEI Ur-N/AD

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3FI-2013-0024 Page 866 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment K Revision 1 Page 14 of 94 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YN71 NEI UIu Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-006 Equipment ID No.

4KVESWGR3A Equip. Class Medium Voltage, Metal-Clad Switchgear

-OR-SWGR-3A3S Equipment Description Switchaear 3A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YoI Ni UI-N/As (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI U[]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Lighting is in walk path. It is not over equipment. No equipment around the Switchgear 3A equipment is likely to collapse onto this equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Rigid conduits are attached, but are acceptable per B288, S19 1.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Questions 7-9 verified.

YN NEI UD N/All YN N[-] u[:] N/AD YZ N[-] U[D] N/AD:

YZ NEI U-EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 867 of1014 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 6 Status: Y[

N-] U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-006 Equipment ID No.

4KVESWGR3A Equip. Class Medium Voltage, Metal-Clad Switchcqear

-OR-SWGR-3A3S Equipment Description Switchqear 3A Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YEE NE] UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

See comments below for description of missing and/or loose screws inside the Switchgear 3A. These were determined to NOT be a seismic concern.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Anchorage is in good condition. All internals were well mounted.

A screw was found missing on an overhead plate in cubicles 1, 3, and 7. Another screw was found to be loose on an overhead plate in cubicle 14. These screws are not a seismic concern since there are several other screws in place on each section of sheet metal. In addition, there is a cross-brace angle directly under the sheet metal that will keep it from being able to fall down inside the cubicle. CR-WF3-2012-06915 was written for these conditions.

See A WC-016 for the area walk-by.

No other seismic concerns were found.

Evaluated by: Stephen Picard

Le.

,AC Date:

I(/i..It Date:

/z.

Z/"

Gregory N. Ferguson r

ý lIj U 0 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 868 of`1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-000(

Attachment Revision Page 16 of $

ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 6 Status: Y[

NEI-U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-006 Equipment ID No.

4KVESWGR3A Equip. Class Medium Voltage, Metal-Clad Switchaear

-OR-SWGR-3A3S Equipment Description Switchaear 3A Photographs Note: View from front of 4KVESWGR3A panel.

panel.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 869 of 1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-000C Attachment Revision Page 17 of ý ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 6 Status: Y"" Nr-U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-006 Equipment ID No.

4KVESWGR3A Equip. Class Medium Voltage, Metal-Clad Switchqear

-OR-SWGR-3A3S Equipment Description Switchqear 3A Photographs Note: View inside SI EBKR3A 4 cubicle.

Typical of most of the other breaker cubicles.

Note: Missing screw location inside ACCEBKR3A 3 cubicle.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 870 ofl1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-1 2-000(

Attachment Revision Page 18 of f ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 6 of 6 Status: YN Nil ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-006 Equipment ID No.

4KVESWGR3A Equip. Class Medium Voltage, Metal-Clad Switchaear

-OR-SWGR-3A3S Equipment Description Switch-gear 3A Photographs

1.

Note: Missing screw location inside HVREBKR3A 7 cubicle.

Note: Loose screw inside EG EBKR3A 14 cubicle.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 871 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-OOOC Attachment Revision Page 19 of ý ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 6 Status: YN N--

U[--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-018 Equipment ID No.

BM MVAAA109 Equip. Class' Pneumatic Operated Valves Or 2BM-F1O8A/B Equipment Description Reactor Drain Tank Outlet Inside Containment Isolation Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. -11 Room, Area Room 421 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

ITT Grinnell, 3225 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

In-Line component. No anchorage installed.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

In-Line component. No anchorage installed.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

In-Line component. No anchorage installed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

In-Line component. No anchorage installed.

YE-NE UI-] N/Az YE-NEI U[-] N/As YE[-

NEI UE N/AE 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 872 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000 Attachment I Revision Page 20 of 9 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YE NFI] UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-018 Equipment ID No.

BM MVAAA109 Equip. Class Pneumatic-Operated Valves Or 2BM-F108A/B Equipment Description Reactor Drain Tank Outlet Inside Containment Isolation

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y-I NEil Ur N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

In-Line component. No anchorage installed.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI UI]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

In-Line component. No anchorage installed.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Valve is under grating on -11 elevation. No nearby equipment or structures would be liable to impact this valve.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

All items have flexible lines or installation has bends that will allow flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y; NEI-UI-N/AU YN NEI-U-] N/A[!

YM NEI ULI N/AU YN NEI U[-

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 873 of1014 ATTACHMENT 9.6 Sheet 3 of 6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Status: YZ ND] U[I]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELI-018 Equipment ID No.

BM MVAAA 109 Equip. Class Pneumatic Operated Valves Or 2BM-F108A/B Equipment Description Reactor Drain Tank Outlet Inside Containment Isolation Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

YN N[]UR Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

See A WC-54 for area walk-by checklist.

Evaluated by: Gregor N. Feruson 2

Stepjhen Picard Date:

4..

.//3 31,1/13 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 874 of11014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-OOC Attachmen Revisiot Page 22 of ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 6 Status: YN NEI-UF]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-018 Equipment ID No.

M MMVAAA 109 Equip. Class Pneumatic Operated Valves Or 2BM-FIO8AIB Equipment Description Reactor Drain Tank Outlet Inside Containment Isolation Photographs Note: View of valve ID tag.

Note: View of valve and valve operator.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 875 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-OOOC Attachment Revision Page 23 of ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 6 Status: YE NEI] UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-018 Equipment ID No.

BM MVAAA109 Equip. Class Pneumatic Operated Valves Or 2BM-F1O8A/B Equipment Description Reactor Drain Tank Outlet Inside Containment Isolation Note: View from side of valve and valve operator. Handtruck in foreground was in place for work in progress in the area. Valve was out of service at time of walkdown due to steam generator replacement project.

Note: View showing flexible connections on air lines to valve operator. Bends in air lines will provide movement for line. Valve location at lowest elevation of containment, plus line solidly embedded in concrete will assure very little movement of valve and valve operator.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 876 of 1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000 Attachment I Revision Page 24 of 9 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 6 of 6 Status: YN NF-U[-

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-018 Equipment ID No.

BMMVAAA109 Or 2BM-FIO8A/B Equip. Class Pneumatic Operated Valves Equipment Description Reactor Drain Tank Outlet Inside Containment Isolation I Elm I

I Note: View showing flexible connections to valve operator. Handtruck in background was in place for work in progress in the area. Valve was out of service at time of walkdown due to steam generator replacement project.

Note:

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 877 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-1 2-0000M Attachment I' Revision '

Page 25 of 9, ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 3 Status: YZ NE]1 U[-E Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-019 Equipment ID No.

CAPMVAAA103 Equip. Class, Pneumatic-Operated Valves

-OR-2HV-B151A Equipment Description Containment Purge Inlet Inside Annulus Location: Bldg. ANN Floor El. +21 Room, Area Room 420 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Fisher Controls Company, Inc., 9220-481N Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

In-Line component. No anchorage on assembly.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

In-Line component. No anchorage on assembly.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

In-Line component. No anchorage on assembly.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

In-Line component. No anchorage on assembly.

YE] NE] U-] N/AZ YE] NO] Ur] N/AZ YE] N-] uE] N/As

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 878 of1014 Englneerlng Report No. WK-3-.;b-12-UUUC Attachment Revision Page 26 of ý ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ NEI ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-019 Equipment ID No.

CAPMVAAA103 Equip. Class Pneumatic-Operated Valves

-OR-2HV-B151A Equipment Description Containment Purge Inlet Inside Annulus

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YOI NE] U[-I N/Az (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

In-Line component. No anchorage on assembly.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN N] U[I-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

The annulus is mostly empty space. There are no other seismic hazards around the valve or valve operator.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The only items that are overhead are some piping and conduits. The annulus is mostly empty. The items overhead are securely in place and present no seismic hazard.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

There is adequate flex connections on the lines.

Y[E NO] UIO N/AE]

YN NE] U[-

N/AE]

Y[R NE] U-] N/AE]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI U--

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 879 of1014 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YZ NnI U0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-019 Equipment ID No.

CAPMVAAA103 Equip. Class Pneumatic-Operated Valves

-OR-2HV-B151A Equipment Description Containment Purqe Inlet Inside Annulus Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ No U[:]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Walkdown showed that solenoid valve CAPISVO103 for this valve only had 3 of 4 mounting bolts installed. One of these 3 mounting bolts did not have full thread engagement. A review of SQRT File SQ-MN-21 1 showed that Farwell & Hendricks test report 50089.2 seismically tested this model solenoid valve, and it was found to meet all seismic qualification requirements with only two mounting bolts installed. This is an acceptable condition.

No seismic hazards were found in the area around the valve.

Photos of this valve were not able to be obtained.

See A WC-059 for the Area Walk-By documentation.

Evaluated by: Gregory N. Ferguson Stephen Picard

ý

ý=ý Ctz-s Date:

s//,

3 '1,3 EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 880 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-1 2-0000.

Attachment I Revision Page 28 of 9.

ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 6 Status: YN Ni-UL-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-026 Equipment ID No.

CVCMVAAA209 Equip. Class' PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES

-OR-2CH-F1529A/B Equipment Description CHARGING HEADER ISOLATION Location: Bldg.

RB Floor El. +21 Room, Area ROOM 225B. COL 10A, LINE M Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

WKM DIV/ACF IND INC, M1 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such vedfication)?

Line-Mounted Valve

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

No anchorage on this valve. It is line-mounted.

YE-] NZ YDI NEJ U-- N/AN

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

No anchorage on this valve. It is line-mounted. No corrosion seen on valve.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

No anchorage on this valve. It is line-mounted. There were no cracks found in the concrete near the valve.

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YI-- Nr-U[-1 N/AZ YLI NDI UK] N/AsZ EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 881 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0001 Attachment Revision Page 29 of!

ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 6 Status: Y]

ND-UI-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-026 Equipment ID No.

CVCMVAAA209 Equip. Class2 PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES

-OR-2CH-F 1 529A1B Equipment Description CHARGING HEADER ISOLATION

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[-] NI U[-I N/WE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NE-I U0-I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Valve is located in the pipe chase beneath the "B" Switchgear room in RAB +21. There is no equipment nearby that could impact this valve.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

There is no equipment overhead of this valve inside the pipe chase.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YZ NEI U-- N/AED YN N[D UD-N/AED Y[

NE] UD-N/AEL YZ N[:] u--

2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 222,fOflnA ATTACHMENT 9.6 Sheet 3 of 6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Status: YX N-- U-IJ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-026 Equipment ID No.

CVCMVAAA209 Equip. Class3 PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES

-OR-2CH-F1529A1B Equipment Description CHARGING HEADER ISOLATION Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

YM ND UE Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

See A WC-031 for the area walk-by checklist.

Evaluated by: Gregory N. Ferguson Stephen Picard c*"ff..

C~

t.

Date:

,( (/,,/,

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 883 of 1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-000(

Attachment Revision Page 31 of f ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 6 Status: Y[* NEI ULI]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-026 Equipment ID No.

CVCMVAAA209 Equip. Class4 PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES

-OR-2CH-F1529A/B Equipment Description CHARGING HEADER ISOLATION Photographs Note: UNID Tag for CVCMVAAA209 Note: Looking down at valve body 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 884 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000, Attachment Revision,

Page 32 of 9, ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 6 Status: YN NEI ul' Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-026 Equipment ID No.

CVCMVAAA209 Equip. Classw PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES

-OR-2CH-F1529A1B Equipment Description CHARGING HEADER ISOLATION Photographs Note: Top of CVCMVAAA209 VALVOP Note: Top of CVCMVAAA209 VALVOP 5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3FI-2013-0024 Page 885 of11014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-OOOC Attachment Revision Page 33 of ý ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 6 of 6 Status: YN ND ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-026 Equipment ID No.

CVCMVAAA209 Equip. Class 6 PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES

-OR-2CH-F1529A/B Equipment Description CHARGING HEADER ISOLATION Photographs Note: Support strut for CVCMVAAA209 Note:

6 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 886 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-OOOC Attachment Revision Page 34 of ý ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 6 Status: YN NEI UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-037 Equipment ID No.

SI MVAAA307-A Equip. Class' Pneumatic-Operated Valves

-OR-2SI-F1564TK1A Equipment Description Safety Injection Tank 1A Fill/Drain Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. +35 Room, Area Room 421, Col. 17 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Fisher Controls Company, Inc., DBQ Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y-I NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

In-Line component.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

In-Line component.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

In-Line component.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

In-Line component.

Y[-] NDI Ul-N/As Y[-

N[:] U[D] N/An YE[- NEI ULI N/As I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 887 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00005 Attachment l<

Revision 1 Page 35 of 94 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YN NEI UF]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-037 Equipment ID No.

SI MVAAA307-A Equip. Class Pneumatic-Operated Valves

-OR-2SI-F 1564TK1A Equipment Description Safety Iniection Tank 1A Fill/Drain

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y-I NEI Ul-N/AsZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI Uil potentially adverse seismic conditions?

In-Line component.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

All nearby equipment and structures are properly mounted. Temporary shielding request 2012-0100 is placed near the valve, but it is properly installed in accordance with Waterford and Entergy procedures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Any overhead or adjacent equipment is properly installed and is not likely to collapse onto this valve and/or operator.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YN NEI-un! N/AL]

YN NEI uF-N/All YZ N[:] U-N/A[L Y[

N[Il U[-

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 888 of1014 ATTACHMENT 9.6 Sheet 3 of 6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Status: YZ ND-] U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-037 Equipment ID No.

SI MVAAA307-A Equip. Class Pneumatic-Operated Valves

-OR-2SI-Fl 564TK1A Equioment Descriotion Safety Iniection Tank 1A Fill/Drain Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEil U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 0 See AWC-060 for the Area Walk-By checklist.

Evaluated by:

Date:

/1'/

/'2

2 12 / /If~ 12, EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 889 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-1 2-000(

Attachment Revision Page 37 of H ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 6 Status: Y[

NEI UF-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-037 Equipment ID No.

SI MVAAA307-A Equip. Class Pneumatic-Operated Valves

-OR-2SI-F1564TK1A Equipment Description Safety Iniection Tank 1A Fill/Drain Photographs Note: View of valve and operator.

Note: view ot v different angle.

e and operator from EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 890 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-000*

Attachment Revision Page 38 of !

ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 6 Status: YN ND U[I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-037 Equipment ID No.

SI MVAAA307-A Equip. Class Pneumatic-Operated Valves

-OR-2SI-F1564TK1A Equipment Description Safety Iniection Tank 1A Fill/Drain Photographs Note: View of valve only.

ota.

VI1WV U) VaIVv aJIU Upudlaw.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 891 ofl1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-OOOC Attachment Revision Page 39 of E ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 6 of 6 Status: YN NEI ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-037 Equipment ID No.

SI MVAAA307-A Equip. Class Pneumatic-Operated Valves

-OR-2SI-F1564TK1A Equipment Description Safety Iniection Tank 1A Fill/Drain Photographs Note: View of limit switch mounting plate on operator.

Note: View of limit switch mounting plate on operator.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 892 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000:

Attachment I Revision Page 40 of 9.

ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YE ND-- UMI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-038 Equipment ID No.

SI MVAAA405B Or Equip. Classi Pneumatic Operated Valves 1SI-V1501B Equipment Description RC Loop 1 SDC Suction Inside Containment Isolation Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. +21 Room, Area Room 421, Col. 17 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Lunkenheimer/ Condec 2490X47 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

In-Line mounting.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Y-- NO YZI NEI U[-

N/As Y[-- NE I uDl N/As YLI NE] u[-- N/AZ Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 893 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0OOC Attachment Revision Page 41 of ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YE NE] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-038 Equipment ID No.

SI MVAAA4O5B or Equip. Class Pneumatic Operated Valves ISI-V1501B Equipment Description RC Loop 1 SDC Suction Inside Containment Isolation

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y-I NEI U0I N/An (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[

N[] ULI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

In-Line mounting.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

There is lead shielding installed near this valve as shown in the attached pictures. However, the lead shielding is installed per plant procedures and engineering requirements. This will not present any seismic concerns.

YM NO] UE[ N/AEI YN NE] UE] N/AE Y[

NEI uE] N/AE]

YM NE-] UE]

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 894 of1014 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ N-j UL-iI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-038 Equipment ID No.

SI MVAAA405B or Equip. Class Pneumatic Operated Valves ISI-V1501B Equipment Description RC Loop 1 SDC Suction Inside Containment Isolation Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEi-] Ui--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

1. The upper end of conduit 30590M-NB, which feeds a computer point for SI ISV0405 B1, can be moved several inches. The lower conduit fitting appears to be loose. This will not affect the seismic ability of SI-405B to perform it's safety function since the cable in the conduit only performs an indication function.

2. The label on T30590M2-NB is loose and needs to be repaired. This loose material could become dislodged during an accident and reach the SI Sump strainers, causing additional flow blockage. This label will not have any effect on the seismic qualification of the SI-405B valve or operator.

3. Some of the buckles and strike plates on the insulation underneath this valve are broken or missing. This is on line 1SI14-146B. This will not have any impact on the seismic qualification of the valve.

CR-WF3-2012-07133 has been written to describe these conditions.

See A WC-056 for the area walk-by checklist.

Evaluated by: Gregory N. Fer usonk*ý-

1)

Date:

.qtpnho-n Pf.ird

O#irLf C-)

31,1/13 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 895 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000:

Attachment i Revision,

Page 43 of 9, ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YN Nril U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-038 Equipment ID No.

SI MVAAA405B or Equip. Class Pneumatic Operated Valves 1SI-V1501B Equipment Description RC Loop 1 SDC Suction Inside Containment Isolation Photographs

.-1 Note: View of S1 405B operator.

Note: View of SI-405B.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 896 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000 Attachment I Revision Page 44 of 9.

ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Shoot 5 of 5 Status: YN NEI I UF Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-038 Equipment ID No.

Sl MVAAA405B or 1SI-VI501B Equip. Class Pneumatic Operated Valves Equipment Description RC Loop I SDC Suction Inside Containment Isolation Note: View of underside of insulation on 1S114-146B showing missing insulation buckles.

Note: View of tilted conduit 3059CM-NB and tape on T30590M2-MB that is loose.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 897 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000 Attachment I Revision Page 45 of 9 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YM NO UFt Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-047 Equipment ID No.

RC ISVIO14 Equip. Class' Motor Operated and Solenoid Operated Valves Or 2RC-E2560B Equipment Description Reactor Vessel Vent to Quench Tank Isolation Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. +46 Room, Area 421, South End of Reactor Cavity Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Target Rock Corporation, 96Q-001 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

In-line mounting.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Y[I NZ Y[-] N[E] UE] N/Az YEI NE] U0] N/An Y-] NEI Ut-- N/AsZ

'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 898 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000" Attachment P Revision,

Page 46 of 9, ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YM NO UD7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-047 Equipment ID No.

RC ISV1014 or Equip. Class Motor Operated and Solenoid Operated Valves 2RC-E2560B Equipment Description Reactor Vessel Vent to Quench Tank Isolation

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YOI NEI U[-- N/As (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[

ND-- U--

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y[9 NFI uD1 N/AD1 YE ND-] UD-N/AD1 YO NDi U-- N/AED YM NEI ur-EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 899 of 1014 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ ND-1 U F-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-047 Equipment ID No.

RC ISV1014 or Equip. Class Motor Operated and Solenoid Operated Valves 2RC-E2560B Equipment Description Reactor Vessel Vent to Quench Tank Isolation Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[

NEI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

1. Evidence of boric acid was found on the valve. It was apparent that this had come from above RC ISV1014. Research showed that CR-WF3-2012-05209 was previously written for this boric acid leak.

2. No other issues found on this SWEL walkdown.

3. See A WC-057 for the area walk-by checklist.

Evaluated by: Gregory N. Ferguson Stephen Picard rt_

tt f-p

-C Date: /!

'2 i2*/ J l2..

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 900 ofl 014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000 Attachment I Revision Page 48 of 9.

ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YN NII U--i Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-047 Equipment ID No.

RC ISV1014 or Equip. Class Motor Operated and Solenoid Operated Valves 2RC-E2560B Equipment Description Reactor Vessel Vent to Quench Tank Isolation Photographs Note: View of RC ISV1014 VALVE.

Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F11-20113-0024 Page 901 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment K Revision 1 Page 49 of 94 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 Status: Y[

N[-

ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-048 Equipment ID No.

RC ISV3184 Equip. Class' Motor Operated and Solenoid Operated Valves Or 2RC-E2557A Equipment Description Pressurizer Vent to Quench Tank Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. +46 Room, Area 421, South End of Reactor Cavity Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Tarqet Rock Corporation, 96Q-001 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL, The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YiI NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

In-line mounting.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Yf-NEI U-I N/AO YEIl NEI UEI N/Au YE] N[-] U-] N/AO

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 902 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000":

Attachment I1 Revision 1 Page 50 of 94 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YE NEIl U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-048 Equipment ID No.

RC ISV3184 or Equip. Class Motor Operated and Solenoid Operated Valves 2RC-E2557A Equipment Description Pressurizer Vent to Quench Tank

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YFI N[D U[D N/As (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEl u0-l potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YN NDI UD1 N/A[D YE ND-U-l] N/AD YE NDI uDl N/AD YE NEI UD1 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 903 of'1014 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YE NM7 U[-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELI-048 Equipment ID No.

RC ISV3184 or Equip. Class Motor Operated and Solenoid Operated Valves 2RC-E2557A Equipment Description Pressurizer Vent to Quench Tank Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y 0 N--] UF-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

1. Evidence of boric acid was found on the valve. It was apparent that this had come from above RC ISV1014. Research showed that CR-WF3-2012-05209 was previously written for this boric acid leak.

2. No other issues found on this SWEL walkdown.

3. See A WC-057 for the area walk-by checklist.

Evaluated by: Greoy N. Ferguson Stenhen Picard ITCC-Date: 12,// /I _Z_

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3FI-2013-0024 Page 904 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000 Attachment I Revision Page 52 of 9.

ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YN NEI UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-048 Equipment ID No.

RC ISV3184 or Equip. Class Motor Operated and Solenoid Operated Valves 2RC-E2557A Equipment Description Pressurizer Vent to Quench Tank Photographs Note: View of RC ISV3184 VALVE.

Note: View of RC ISV3184 VALVE.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 905 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000 Attachment I Revision Page 53 of 9 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 7 Status: YN NEII U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-059 Equipment ID No.

ACCMFAN0002-B Equip. Class, Fans

-OR-FAN 10 Equipment Description WET COOLING TOWER B FAN 2-SB Location: Bldg. CTB Floor El. +30 Room, Area ROOM B60A COL 12A LINE Q1 AZ DEG Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

AEROVENT INC, Model W, SR: FAN, COOLING Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Item not one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring anchorage configuration verification.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Y-I NO YO N[:] Ur-N/AD YO NDI UD-N/AE]

YO NE] UD-] N/AED

There were no cracks visible in the concrete near the ACCMFANOOO2B.

'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 906 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000:

Attachment I Revision Page 54 of 9.

ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 7 Status: YEE NEI-U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-059 Equipment ID No.

ACCMFAN0002-B Equip. Class Fans

-OR-FAN 10 Equipment Description WET COOLING TOWER B FAN 2-SB

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[--

NEIl U1 N/AS (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Item not one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN Ni U--

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

There is no equipment mounted above or near this fan. The fan is located on the top elevation of the cooling tower area.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

There is no equipment mounted above or near this fan. The fan is located on the top elevation of the cooling tower area.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y[

N[-] UEI N/AE]

YZ NEI UI N/AE]

YZ NEI U-I N/AU YZ NEI U[l EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 907 of1014 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 7 Status: YZ NiD Ui--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-059 Equipment ID No.

ACCMFAN0002-B Equip. Class Fans

-OR-FAN 10 Equipment Description WET COOLING TOWER B FAN 2-SB Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[

N-] Ui--I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Spalled concrete was found around the edges of the embedded plates for the wet cooling tower fan support structure. This condition was previously identified and evaluated in CR-WF3-2002-00337 for the WCT B fans 1 - 4. This condition was determined to NOT be a seismic concern. CR-WF3-2001-00748 also identified spalled concrete around the embedded plates for WCT B fans 5 - 8.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

For area walk-by checklist see AWC-061.

Evaluated by: Gregory N. Ferguson, Stephen Picard 6 ~ NY Date:

16 f2Z IL2~*

12-EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 908 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-1 2-000(

Attachment Revision Page 56 of ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 7 Status: YN NEI U[D Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-059 Equipment ID No.

ACCMFAN0002-B Equip. Class Fans

-OR-FAN 10 Equipment Description WET COOLING TOWER B FAN 2-SB Photographs Note: Equipment ID tag.

,r of shroud and Ifan upVr.ll fan support.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 909 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000 Attachment I Revision Page 57 of 9 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 7 Status: Y[

NO U7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-059 Equipment ID No.

ACCMFAN0002-B Equip. Class Fans

-OR-FAN 10 Equipment Description WET COOLING TOWER B FAN 2-SB EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3FI-2013-0024 Page 910 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000" Attachment I, Revision,

Page 58 of 9, ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 6 of 7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-059 Equipment ID No.

ACCMFAN0002-B Equip. Class Fans

-OR-FAN 10 Equipment Description WET COOLING TOWER B FAN 2-SB Status: YN NiD U--

I I Note: View looking at fan support and part of motor.

Note: View showing bolts used to mount shroud and fans.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3FI-2013-0024 Page 911 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000' Attachment l<

Revision 1 Page 59 of 94 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 7 of 7 Status: YN NiD U-L Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-059 Equipment ID No.

ACCMFAN0002-B

-OR-FAN 10 Equip. Class Fans Equipment Description WET COOLING TOWER B FAN 2-SB Note: View showing bolts used to mount fan and shroud.

Note: View looking up on fan shroud showing peeling paint. Material underneath is galvanized.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 912 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000, Attachment Revision Page 60 of 91 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 7 Status: YZ NOI-U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-075 Equipment ID No.

IC ICDC1-C Equip. Classi Instrument Racks Equipment Description Instrument Cabinet C-IC Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. +21 Room, Area 421, Column 16 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Mercury Instruments (no model number)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YM NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Anchorage consists of bolts connected to structural steel.

1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YM NO ulI N/ADl YE NEI UD N/ADI YDI NDI UL-N/AM EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 913 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-000(

Attachment Revision Page 61 of ý ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 7 Status: YEE Nil] UII Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-075 Equipment ID No.

IC ICDC1-C Equip. Class Instrument Racks Equipment Description Instrument Cabinet C-1C

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YN NIl UI-- N/Afl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The seismic qualification files for this component (SQ-IC-61) calls for eight (8) 2" diameter bolts. This SQRT File was prepared for the Three Mile Island plant. However, vendor drawing 1564-9155, which is specifically prepared for this component, calls for six (6) bolts. In the field, there are seven bolts installed. Three (3) in the front, three (3) in the rear, and one (1) on the right end of the panel. CR-WF3-2012-07132 has been written for this condition.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[

NEI] U[I-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

The issue of the number of bolts identified in question 5 above does not result in a concern over the adequacy of the mounting of the panel. The extra bolt above that called out in 1564-9155 will not impact the seismic qualification of the panel. The base of this panel is made of stiff channels and will act as one assembly. EC 41374 was prepared and issued to address the issues on this panel.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Rigid conduits are attached, but are acceptable per B288, S19 1.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YN Nil U-N/At YN NEI U[i N/AOl YZ NEI U[D-N/AD YE NEI U[-

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 914 of1014 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 7 Status: YZ ND-7 U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-075 Equipment ID No.

IC ICDC1-C Equip. Class Instrument Racks Equipment Description Instrument Cabinet C-1C Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UI--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Some issues were found internal to the panel and are described in the comments section below.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

1. Conduits 39752-NA and 36323-NA are mounted to the outside panel on the left end of IC ICDC1-C. The fittings attaching these conduits to the panel need to be tightened. No seismic concerns with this condition.

2. An electrical plug underneath the panel on the left end of IC ICDC1-C is loose and needs to be tightened. No seismic concerns with this condition.

3. A panel cover on the lower left inside of IC ICDCI-C is missing one bolt out of four. Panel cover will remain in place during seismic event.

4. A shield cover on the lower right inside of IC ICDC 1-C is missing the nut on one of the hold-down bolts. Three are properly installed. Shield cover will remain in place during seismic event.

5. IC ITS3001 C2 on the upper right inside of IC ICDC1-C is loose. The nut for the hold down assembly is missing. This instrument was abandoned in place per DC-3382 according to Asset Suite. However, it still needs to be properly mounted to prevent potential danger to other equipment. Instrument cannot come free of bracket screw during seismic event since it would have to move upwards at least 1 "more than the panel. No seismic Il/I concerns.

6. CR-WF3-2012-07132 has been written to describe these conditions.

See A WC-056 for Area Walk-By Checklist.

Evaluated by: Gregor N. Ferguson Date:

Steohen Picard

-3/

13/-

I EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 915 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000 Attachment I1 Revision 1 Page 63 of 94 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 7 Status: YE NFD U-'

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-075 Equipment ID No.

IC ICDCI-C Equip. Class Instrument Racks Equipment Description Instrument Cabinet C-IC Photographs Note: View of front of panel.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 916 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000 Attachment I Revision Page 64 of 9, ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 7 Status: YN NEIl Ur Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl -0 Equipment ID No.

IC ICDC1-C Equip. Clas, Equipment Description Instrument Cabinet C-1C Instrument Racks Note: View of front of panel showing structural bolting. Fabric material is FME material placed over floor grating during the outage. The red tape is used to hold down the material. This is removed during plant operation.

Note: Electrical plug undemeath panel on left exterior of IC ICDC1-C. Plug connection to panel is loose.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 917 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000; Attachment F Revision "

Page 65 of 9e ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 6 of 7 Status: Y; NEII UFl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-075 Equipment ID No.

IC ICDCI-C Equip. Class Instrument Racks Equipment Description Instrument Cabinet C-1C Note: Location of conduits 39752-NA and 36323-NA that need to have the fittings tightened.

Note: IC ITS3001 C2 on upper right inside of panel. Note missing nut on hoiddown bracket for instrument.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 918 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00002 Attachment IP Revision 1 Page 66 of 94 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 7 of 7 Status: YN Nr-7 UL]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELI-0; Equipment ID No.

IC ICDC1-C Equip. Class Equipment Description Instrument Cabinet C-1C Instrument Racks Note: Panel cover on lower right inside of panel with missing screw on upper right location on cover.

Note: Shield cover on lower right inside of panel with missing nut on lower right bolt.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 919 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-OOOC Attachment Revision Page 67 of c ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 6 Status: YZ NOI UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-077 Equipment ID No.

IC ICDC9 Equip. Class, Instrument Racks Equipment Description Reactor Drain Tank Outlet Inside Containment Isolation Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. +21 Room, Area Room 421, Column 6 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Mercury Company (no model number)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[

NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Panel is bolted to structural steel supports, not concrete.

YN NEI UD-N/AD YN N[:] U[] r(l/AI Y4-NE] U-] N/AZ 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 920 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000 Attachment Revision Page 68 of 9 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YM NEI UF-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-077 Equipment ID No.

IC ICDC9 Equip. Class Instrument Racks Equipment Description Instrument Cabinet C-9

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y; NEI U('-

N/AC]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The seismic qualification documentation for this panel called for eight (8) !" bolts. Drawing 1564-9158 calls for ten (10) bolts to be installed.

There are actually ten (10) installed. Four (4) are installed in the rear, four in the front, and one on each end. CR-WF3-2012-07219 was written to address this documentation discrepancy.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NE] U-]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Rigid conduits are attached, but are acceptable per B288, S19 1.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YN NEI UE*] N/AO YM NE] U[-

N/AE Y[Z NE] uE-N/AE]

YN NE] U--

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page Q-24 ofj A

ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 6 Status: YZ NEI-UL-0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-077 Equipment ID No.

IC ICDC9 Equip. Class Instrument Racks Equipment Description Instrument Cabinet C-9 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NE-"

UI-"

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

The interior of this cabinet was clean and had no loose equipment. No hazards were seen around this cabinet.

CR-WF3-2012-07219 was written to document that there are 10 bolts used to mount the panel to the steel, while the SQRT file SQ-IC-61 only calls for 8 bolts. However, drawing 1564-9158, which was prepared specifically for Waterford 3, does call for 10 bolts.

See A WC-055 for the area walk-by for this equipment.

I2~

/1 Evaluated by: Gregory N. Ferquson r

r l

I F

Steohegn Pirard

~crlPIZL.Q-(U Date:

/ i EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 922 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000 Attachment Revision Page 70 of 9 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 6 Status: YN NEIl U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-077 Equipment ID No.

IC ICDC9 Equip. Class Instrument Racks Equipment Description Instrument Cabinet C-9 Photographs Note: View of panel.

Note: View of front of panel showing structural bolting. Fabric material is FME material placed over floor grating during the outage. The red tape is used to hold down the material. This is removed during plant operation.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 923 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment K Revision 1 Page 71 of 94 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 6 Status: YN ND UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-077 Equipment ID No.

IC ICDC9 Equip. Class Instrum Equipment Description Instrument Cabinet C-9 ent Racks Note: View of right end of panel showing structural bolt. Fabric material is FME material placed over floor grating during the outage.

The red tape is used to hold down the material.

This is removed during plant operation.

)n of panel.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 924 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000 Attachment Revision Page 72 of 9 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 6 of 6 Status: YE NE-] UD-ý Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-077 Equipment ID No.

IC ICDC9 Equip. Class Instrument Racks Equipment Description Instrument Cabinet C-9 portion of panel.

Note: View of inside of panel.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 925 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment K Revision 1 Page 73 of 94 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 6 Status: Y[

NI ] U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-079 Equipment ID No.

SG ILT1115A Equip. Class, Instrument Racks Or LT-FW-1115AS Equipment Description Steam Generator 1 Level IXMITR (Wide Range)

Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. -4 Room, Area 421, column 18 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

ITT Barton Instuments, 764 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[-

NO

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

YZ N[-] UD--

N/A[D YZ ND-] U[-] N/AED YO NEI UL] N/A[D 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 926 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment K Revision 1 Page 74 of 94 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 6 Status: Y[

N-] U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-079 Equipment ID No.

SG ILT1115A or Equip. Class Instrument Racks L T-FW-11 15A S Equipment Description Steam Generator 1 Level IXMITR (Wide Range)

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE]

NEI U-- N/As (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YM NEI Uil potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

A lead shielding stand called a "Smitty Shield" has been placed directly up against this instrument. According to EC 40686 (TSR 2012-117),

this shielding is not supposed to be placed where it could fall over and hit any safety related equipment. CR-WF3-2012-07217 has been written for this issue. The lead shielding was installed after the instrument was taken out of service and was removed before the instrument was required to be back in service.

YN NEI uE] N/AE]

Y[

NE] uEl N/AE]

Y[

NE] UE] N/AE]

YEE NEI UE-]

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 927 of1014 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 6 Status: YN NI--

UF-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELI-079 Equipment ID No.

SG IL T1115A or Equip. Class Instrument Racks LT-FW-1115AS Equipment Description Steam Generator Level 1 IXMITR (Wide Range)

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI U[]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

See A WC-058 for Area Walk-By Checklist.

Date:

d' /3 Evaluated by: Greor N. Feruson Stephen Picard Fg%

ý4ý'i*L L. C Date:

u!bzx 3/11,1 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 928 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000:

Attachment I Revision Page 76 of 9, ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 6 Status: YN ND ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-079 Equipment ID No.

SG ILT1115A Equip. Class Instrument Racks Or LT-FW-1115AS Equipment Description Steam Generator 1 Level IXMITR (Wide Ranqe)

Photographs Note: Instrument ID tag.

Note: Instrument stand. Also shows "Smitty Shield" adjacent to instrument. CR-WF3-2012-07217 was initiated for the shielding.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 929 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-1 2-000(

Attachment Revision Page 77 of f ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 6 Status: YX NE I UFI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-079 Equipment ID No.

SG ILT1115A Equip. Class Instrument Racks Or LT-FW-1115AS Equipment Description Steam Generator I Level IXMITR (Wide Rance)

Photographs Note: Lower part of instrument stand. CR-WF3-2012-07217 was written for the lead shielding up against the instruments.

Note: Instrument stand mounting. CR-WF3-2012-07217 was written for the lead shielding up against the instruments.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 930 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-1 2-000(

Attachment Revision Page 78 of H ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 6 of 6 Status: Y] NEI UD]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-079 Equipment ID No. SG ILT1115A Equip. Class Instrument Racks Or LT-FW-1115AS Equipment Description Steam Generator 1 Level IXMITR (Wide Range)

Photographs Note: "Smitty Shield" directly up against instrument. CR-WF3-2012-07217 was written for the lead shielding up against the instrument.

Note: "Smitty Shield" up against instruments on lower part of stand. CR-WF3-2012-07217 was written for the lead shielding up against the instrument.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3FI-2013-0024 Page 931 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000=

Attachment I' Revision 1 Page 79 of 9z ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YZ NE I UF--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-080 Equipment ID No.

RC ITE0122-HA1 Equip. Class' Temperature Sensors

-OR-TE-RC-0122HA Equipment Description Reactor Coolant Loop 2 Hot Leg Temperature Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. -4 Room, Area Room 423 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Weed Instrument Company, Inc., N9004E2B Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL, The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Line mounted equipment.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Line mounted equipment.

YE-NE Y[E] NEI U[-

N/AZ

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Line mounted equipment.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Line mounted equipment.

YE:- NEI uE-- N/AO YE-NE-UEI N/AZ 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 932 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-000(

Attachment Revision Page 80 of H ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NEI U-i Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-080 Equipment ID No.

RC ITE0122-HA1 Equip. Class Temperature Sensors

-OR-TE-RC-0122HA Equipment Description Reactor Coolant Loop 2 Hot Leg Temperature

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE NE UE N/As (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Line mounted equipment.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEý UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Line mounted equipment.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

All equipment above and adjacent to RTD is mounted properly.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All equipment above and adjacent to RTD that could fall onto RTD is mounted properly.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

There is flexible conduit attached to the RTD.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

No adverse seismic interaction effects were found.

YZ NE UE-N/AE YN* NO* U--] N/AO Y[

NEI U-NIA[

Y[

NEI uNA EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 933 of1014 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YN NFD U[-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-080 Equipment ID No.

RC ITE0122-HAl Equip. Class Temperature Sensors

-OR-TE-RC-0122HA Equipment Description Reactor Coolant Loop 2 Hot Leq Temperature Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[: UI'-

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No conditions were found that could adversely affect the safety function of the RTD during or after a seismic event.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

For Area Walk-By see A WC-062.

Evaluated by: Gregory N. Ferguson

.'*-d-.--

Date:

Stephen Picard f

cc

,7z, 23 Z)2 124t EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 934 ofl 014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment K Revision I Page 82 of 94 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y] NEI Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-080 Equipment ID No.

RC ITE0122-HA1 Equip. Class Temperature Sensors

-OR-TE-RC-0122HA Equipment Description Reactor Coolant Loop 2 Hot Lea Temperature Photographs Note: View of RTD.

Note: View of area above RTD.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3Fi-2013-0024 Page 935 ofi 014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000:

Attachment I Revision Page 83 of 9 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YX NEI U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-080 Equipment ID No.

RC ITE0122-HA1 Equip. Class Temperature Sensors

-OR-TE-RC-0122HA Equipment Description Reactor Coolant Loop 2 Hot Leg Temperature Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 936 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000.

Attachment P Revision '

Page 84 of 9, ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YE NEI Ur-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-084 Equipment ID No.

IC ECP08 Equip. Class, Instrumentation and Control Panels

-OR-CP-08 Equipment Description Engineered Safeguard Control Panel CP8 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. +46 Room, Area Room 304, Col. 9A, Line J Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Reliance Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y-I NZ

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

While this anchorage is not part of the 50% of SWEL items requiring anchorage verification, it was looked at during the opening of the panel.

Welds could be seen attaching the panel to the floor as shown in SQRT File SQ-IC-32. No damage to the anchorage was seen.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

No corrosion was seen.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

YN NED ULI N/A0 YZ NEI UEi-N/All]

YE NIE IU[] N/Al]

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 937 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment K Revision 1 Page 85 of 94 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NO U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-084 Equipment ID No.

IC ECP08 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels

-OR-CP-08 Equipment Description Engineered Safeguard Control Panel CP8

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[-I NO UI N/As (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI U[I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

The interaction identified in the IPEEE report has been corrected. All equipment over this panel is seismically installed and will not impact it.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All equipment such as ceiling tiles and lights are seismically installed.

No other items around or overhead are likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

All cables enter through the floor or through adjacent panels. There is adequate flexibility in the attached cables.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YN ND UD N/AD YN NDI Ui N/AD YE NDI UD-N/AD Y[

ND U-EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 938 0fL0!4 ATTACHMENT 9.6 Sheet 3 of 5 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Status: Y[Z NI-U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELI-084 Equipment ID No.

IC ECP08 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels

-OR-CP-08 Equipment Description Engineered Safeguard Control Panel CP8 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN N[-] UrD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

See A WC-032 for area walk-by.

0 0

0 A sheet metal cover plate in the upper part of the panel was found with only 3 of 5 screws installed.

Sections of plastic wire tray covers were found loose on the bottom part of the panel.

CR-WF3-2012-06688 was written for these two findings.

Evaluated by:

Date:

3llls/,/*

11 /5/

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F17-2013-0024 Page 939 ofl 014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00002 4 Revision 1 Page 87 of 94 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[

NF'] Ui'-

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-084 Equipment ID No.

IC ECP08 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels

-OR-CP-08 Equipment Description Engineered Safeguard Control Panel CP8 Photographs Note: Sheet metal cover plate with 3 of 5 screws installed.

Note: Loose section of plastic wire tray cover.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 940 ofl 014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment K Revision 1 Page 88 of 94 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YM NEI Ur]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-084 Equipment ID No.

IC ECP08 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels

-OR-CP-08 Equipment Description Engineered Safeguard Control Panel CP8 Photographs Note: Loose section of plastic wire tray cover.

Note: Loose section of plastic wire tray cover.

EN-DC-i168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 941 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000:,

Revision '

Page 89 of 9, ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 6 Status: Y[Z NEII UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-097 Equipment ID No.

4KVESWGR3B Equip. Class' Medium Voltage, Metal-Clad Switchqear

-OR-SWGR-3B3S Equipment Description Switchqear 3B Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. +21 Room, Area Room 212, Col. 10A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

General Electric Company, AM4163502H Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y-I NO

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

No anchorage damage was seen.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

YO NEI U-- N/ADl YE NDI uD-N/ADl YZ NEI UD-N/ADl 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 942 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment K Revision 1 Page 90 of 94 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YN NFil ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-097 Equipment ID No.

4KVESWGR3B Equip. Class Medium Voltage, Metal-Clad Switchqear

-OR-SWGR-3B3S Equipment Description Switchqear 3B

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE] N U-I N/AjZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YI NEI UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Lighting is in walk path. It is not over equipment. No equipment around the Switchgear 3B equipment is likely to collapse onto this equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Rigid conduits are attached, but are acceptable per B288, S19-1.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Questions 7-9 verified.

YN NEI ul N/AII YN NEI UE] N/AD1 YN NEI uE-N/AD YN NEI ul-EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 943 of1014 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 6 Status: YZ N--

U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELI-097 Equipment ID No.

4KVESWGR3B Equip. Class Medium Voltage, Metal-Clad Switchqear

-OR-SWGR-3B3S Equipment Description Switchqear 3B Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI] U[I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

See comments below for description of missing and/or loose screws inside the Switchgear 3B. These were determined to NOT be a seismic concern.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Anchorage in panels that were opened is in good condition. All internals were well mounted.

One loose screw and one missing screw were found in cubicles 7 and 11 on overhead plates.

These screws are not a concern since there are several other screws in place on the sheet metal. CR-WF3-2012-06179 was written for this condition.

Clips were found missing on the relay panel inside cubicle 14. CR-WF3-2012-06179 was written for this condition. A second walkdown of this cubicle showed that there are supposed to be two machine screws in place to hold the relay panel in place (along with the hinge on the opposite side). Only one machine screw was installed. This condition was documented in CR-WF3-2012-06634. The one remaining machine screw will easily keep this relay panel in place and there is no seismic concern.

Holes in brackets for this switchgear were seen during the walkdown. These holes were determined to be locations for cables to pass through with grommets. The holes were empty where no cables or grommets were installed.

See AWC-018 for the area walk-by.

No other seismic concerns were found.

Evaluated by: Gregory N. Ferguson LL-1 Stephen Picard 4

"-I-CJ Date:

//

7/t "A it.-

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 944 ofl 014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-1 2-000(

Attachment Revision Page 92 of f ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 6 Status: Y[

NO U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-097 Equipment ID No.

4KVESWGR3B Equip. Class Medium Voltage, Metal-Clad Switchaear

-OR-SWGR-3B3S Equipment Description Switchqear 3B Photographs Note: Locations where grommets and cables could be installed.

Note: Clips missing from edge of relay panel inside cubicle 14. CR-WF3-2012-06179 was written for this condition. Machine screw can be seen in center of relay panel, with missing machine screw hole towards top. CR-WF3-2012-06634 written for this missing machine screws.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 945 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000: 4 Revision 1 Page 93 of 94 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 6 Status: YN NO] UL-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-097 Equipment ID No.

4KVESWGR3B Equip. Class Medium Voltage, Metal-Clad Switchqear

-OR-SWGR-3B3S Equipment Description Switchaear 3B Photographs Note: Loose screw on sheet metal plate on top of Switchgear 3B cubicle.

Note: Screw missing from sheet metal plate on top of Switchgear 3B cubicle.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3FI-2013-0024 Page 946 ofl 014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00002 Attachment N(

Revision 1 Page 94 of 94 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 6 of 6 Status: Y[

NEI ur-L Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

SWELl-097 Equipment ID No.

4KVESWGR3B Equip. Class Medium Voltage, Metal-Clad Switchaear

-OR-SWGR-3B3S Equipment Description Switchqear 3B Photographs Note: View along front of Switchgear 3B.

Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 947 of1014 CIIlYlll I:t:I Illlly ir*t!YUI I, NU. vvro-o-it*.*-%

I *Iu,)

Attachment L Revision 1 Page 1 of 60 Attachment L Area Walk-by Checklists (AWCs)

Revision 1 See Attachment D for Revision 0 AWCs

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 948 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 2 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YZ ND--

UD-7 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 019 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. +21 Room, Area' Switchcqear Room B West Side SWEL Components: SWELl- 004 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

The amount of fill inside the cable trays could not be seen as they were all in the overhead. However, the cable trays, conduit runs, and HVAC ducting are all well supported in this area with structural steel engineered supports.

YZ N[:] U[-I N/AD Y[* N[-] U[-

N/AD YER ND UD N/AE]

I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 949 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-1 2-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 3 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NOI U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 019 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. +21 Room, Area Switchgear Room B West Side

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

There is some fire protection sprinkler piping in the overhead area.

However, this piping is well supported and no interactions were seen that could cause a failure of the piping during a seismic event.

Y[

N[-] Uil N/A[

YE NEI UD1 N/All

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Some work was in progress in the area on some panels adjacent to the CED breaker panel. The work carts for this in-progress work were all held in place with clamps on the wheels. The work was proceeding in accordance with the housekeeping procedure for WF3.

Y[

N[D] uD-N/AL Y[

ND-u[--

N/AL EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page *5.. nfl 014 ATTACHMENT 9.7 Sheet 3 of 4 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Status: YZ N-] Ut"-

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 019 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. +21 Room, Area Switch-Qear Room B West Side

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[K Nt[-] U-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

The area walk-by did not uncover any areas of seismic concern.

Evaluated by: Greor N.

/,

FephsnDate:

/

2-Stephen Picard Cg

,/Zj* / / (.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 951 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-1 2-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 5 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YN NEI UDý Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 019 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. +21 Room, Area Switchqear Room B West Side SWEL Components: SWELl - 004 Photographs Note: Photograph of the area behind the CED breaker panel. No pictures were taken of the other side of the panel due to electronically sensitive equipment across from the CED breaker panel.

Note: Additional photo ot CED breaker panel.

the EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 952 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000' Attachment I Revision '

Page 6 of 6(

ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YE NO U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 031 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. +21 Room, Areal 225B 1 OA - M SWEL Components: SWELl- 026 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

This area is inside of the pipe chase below the +21 elevation inside the B Switchgear area.

YN NEI U[-

N/AEl

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

YZ NDl UD-'

N/ADl Y[

ND UIl N/AEl This area is inside of the pipe chase below the +21 elevation inside the B Switchgear area. There is no cable tray or HVAC ducting in this area. There are some conduits and tubing. These are all free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 953 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 7 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YN N-] U-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 031 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. +21 Room, Area2 225B / 1OA - M

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

This area is inside of the pipe chase below the +21 elevation inside the B Switchgear area. There is no other equipment above this area.

YZ N[-

U-NIAEI

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

YZ NE U-N/AE YIZ NEI uEl N/AE1 YN N[1 uE-N/AE]

2 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 954 of1014 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YN ND-Ur-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 031 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El.

+21 Room, Area:3 225B / 10A - M

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y;

NEI UF-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

A strut for support CHSR237 was found attached to line 2CH2-53A/B.

The snubber for this support was removed from service in 1986 using SMP-1713. The strut should have been removed per drawing E3029LW3CH13, but was left in place. One end of the strut was attached to the pipe, and the other was left on a concrete ledge inside the pipe chase. This abandoned strut was removed under work order 333109.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

CR-WF3-2012-06445 was written for the strut left in place on CHSR-237.

Evaluated by: Gregory N. Fer uson

/-.

a-,"

Date:

./ /z-i h Steohen Picard Lea.*.,_,

i -/t

-3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 955 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 9 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Y[

NEIl ULI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 031 Location: Bldg. RB Flogr El. +21 Room, Area4 225B / 10A - M SWEL Components: SWELl - 026 Photographs Note: CHSR-237 strut attached to pipe at top of picture.

Note: Strut from CHSR-237 can be seen on top of concrete ledge in center of picture.

4 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 956 of'1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 10 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 6 Status: YN NEI U[--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 054 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. -11 Room, Area, Between Column Lines 13 - 15 SWEL Components: SWELl-018. BM MVAAA109 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

YE NEI U-- N/AL Y[

NEI UEL N/All Y;

NEI ul-N/All This area is on the -11 basement level of containment and is below floor grating. The grating is well supported and prevents any hazards above from reaching this area.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 957 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 11 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YN NEIl UI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 054 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. -11 Room, Area Between Column Lines 13 - 15

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U-I N/AD spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

This area is below the flood zone inside containment during a LOCA.

However, this is a known and designed flooding event. No other surrounding sources of flooding or spray were found in this area.

Y[

N[-] U-N/AED

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

There is work in progress on-going in the area. However, this equipment was restrained properly and well away from the safety related equipment. Similarly, there is significant lead shielding temporarily installed near this area. However, it is installed in accordance with Temporary Shielding Requests that were documented in Engineering Changes. Note that the equipment in this area is out of service due to the steam generator replacement project.

YN NDI UD1 N/A[D YN NDI UD-N/AED EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 958 of`1014 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 6 Status: Y]

NF] UI-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 054 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. -11 Room, Area Between Column Lines 13 - 15

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UrE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Boric acid crystals were found in the general area a few feet away from BM MVAAA 109. Corrosion was found on BM IPT0601 IXMITR where the boric acid had fallen. This is documented in CR-WF3-2012-07125. None of this corrosion presents any seismic or structural concerns for surrounding equipment at this time.

Evaluated by: Gregory N. Ferguson

/24 V

Date:

Stephen Picard 12-JOhQ 4 i 2eL5

{, _.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 959 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 13 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 6 Status: YN N7-ur-7 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 054 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. -11 Room, Area Between Column Lines 13 - 15 SWEL Components: SWELI-018, BM MVAAA109 Photographs Note: Overhead area near BM MVAAA 109.

Note: Some boric acid crystals seen on floor in area. Instrument in picture is BM IPT0601 IXMITR. See CR-WF3-2012-07125.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 960 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 14 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 6 Status: YN N[* U[-II Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 054 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. -11 Room, Area Between Column Lines 13 - 15 SWEL Components: SWEL1-018. BM MVAAA109 Note: Corrosion from boric acid on BM IPT0601 IXMITR. See CR-WF3-2012-07125.

Note: Corrosion from boric acid on BM IPT0601 IXMITR. See CR-WF3-2012-07125.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3FI-2013-0024 Page 961 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 15 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 6 of 6 Status: Y[

NEI Ur-1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 054 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. -11 Room, Area Between Column Lines 13 - 15 SWEL Components: SWELI-018. BM MVAAA109 Note: Corrosion from boric acid on conduit and grating overhead. See CR-WF3-2012-07125.

Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 962 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-0000O Attachment I Revision 1 Page 16 of 6C ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YZ N--1 UI--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 055 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. +21 Room, Area' 421, Col. 5 to Col. 9, Outside D-Rings SWEL Components: SWELl -077 (IC ICDC9)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

YN NE I UE-- N/ADl YN NEI UD:] N/ADl YN ND U[D N/ADl I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 963 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 17 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YN NFD UL]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 055 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. +21 Room, Area 421, Col. 5 to Col. 9, Outside D-Rings

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NO Ur-I N/ADl spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

There are fire lines in the area. However, these are well supported and do not introduce any additional danger of flooding. Since this component is located inside containment, there is always the potential for containment spray to fall down onto it during an accident. However, equipment is designed to meet these requirements.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

YE N-UDl N/AD1 YZ ND ur1 N/AD1 YE NDI UD N/AO EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 964 of1014 ATTACHMENT 9.7 Sheet 3 of 4 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Status: Y[

N[] U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 055 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. +21 Room, Area 421, Col. 5 to Col. 9. Outside D-Rings

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NR UI--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

No adverse seismic conditions were found during this Area Walk-By.

Evaluated by: Greory N. Ferquson"*/i, Date:

/

2..Z Stephen Picard Z

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 965 ofO114 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision I Page 19 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YE NDT U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 055 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. +21 Room, Area 421, Col. 5 to Col. 9, Outside D-Rinas SWEL Components: SWELl-077 (IC ICDC9)

Photographs Note: View over the top of /C ICDC9.

Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 966 of'1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 20 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 4 Status: YN NFI UD]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 056 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. +21 Room, Areal 421, Col. 14 to CoL 19 Outside D-Rings SWEL Components: SWELl -038, SWELl -075 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Y[

NE U-I N/AE1 YM NEI U[L N/AE1 YZ NEI ur-N/AE*

1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 967 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 21 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y[Z NO UI--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 056 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. +21 Room, Area 421, CoL 14 to CoL 19, Outside D-Rings

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

YN NIO UI-- N/All

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

YE NDI UD-N/AD YN NEI Ui[E N/ADl YE ND uD N/A[D EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3FI-2013-0024 Page 968 of1014 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y[

N--

UL-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 056 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. +21 Room, Area 421, Col. 14 to Col. 19, Outside D-Rings

8. Have you looked for and found. no other seismic conditions that could Y[

NF-Z U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

1. An unnumbered electrical box with conduit 32851B1-NB in it is missing 6 of 12 bolts on the front cover.

2. Electrical box B30860-NA is missing I out of 12 bolts on the front cover.

CR-WF3-2012-07135 written to describe these two conditions.

Evaluated by: Gregor N. Feruson

/

Date:,//

Stephen Picard IZ EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 969 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-1 2-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 23 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Y[

NEI Ui'-

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 056 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. +21 Room, Area 421, Col. 14 to Col. 19, Outside D-Rings SWEL Components: SWELl -038. SWELl -075 Photographs Note: Unnumbered electrical box with conduit 32851B1-NB. Front cover is missing 6 of 12 bolts.

Note: Electrical box B30860-NA is missing I of 12 bolts on front cover.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 970 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision I Page 24 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YE NF UFi Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 057 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. +46 Room, Area' South End of Reactor Cavity SWEL Components: SWELl -047, SWELl -048 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

YE NEI U-- N/Afl YN NO UI-- N/A[]

YN NE I U[I-N/A[]

' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 971 of1O14 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-1 2-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 25 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YE NEI UDF Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 057 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. +46 Room, Area South End of Reactor Cavity

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UE-N/AEl spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Y[

NEI uEl N/AE YN NEI UE-N/AE Y[

NEI u[] N/AEl EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page Q-7-oflnlld ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NO U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 057 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. +46 Room, Area South End of Reactor Cavity

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[

NO U--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

1. Spring hanger support RCSH-4162 was found to have the angle under the pipe off-center. This condition is documented in CR-WF3-2012-07129. EC 41521 was processed to evaluate the as-found condition for this support. This EC determined that the stresses in the pipe are acceptable with the support off-center. This is not an adverse condition.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

1. There is evidence of boric acid leakage above the valves RC ISV3184 and RC ISV1014. It was found that the boric acid leakage was documented in CR-WF3-2012-05209 near the beginning of RF18.

Evaluated by: Gregory N. Fer uson i-lfi LA-eý Date:

/

)'.-

Stephen Picard

_______-_"_/____

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 973 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-1 2-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 27 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YN NEI Ut]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 057 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. +46 Room, Area South End of Reactor Cavity SWEL Components: SWELl -047, SWELl -048 Photographs Note: View of evidence of boric acid leakage above RC ISV3184 and RC ISVIO14.

Note: View of RCSH-4162 off-center. CR-WF3-2012-07129 covers this condition.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 974 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision I Page 28 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 6 Status: YZ NEI U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC-058 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. -4 Room, Areal 421, Column 18 SWEL Components: SWELl-079 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

YE NO UD-N/AE YZ ND-] U[I N/ADl YM NDI UI-N/ADl I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 975 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 29 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YN NI U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC-058 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. -4 Room, Area 421, column 18

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. D6es it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

A cart was found that did not have the wheels chocked. This cart was for work in progress, but the storage did not meet Waterford 3 standards for housekeeping. The group responsible for the cart was notified and they removed the cart from the area and stored it properly prior to fuel being moved into the RCB.

Y[

NEI UE] NIAEI Y[

NE: UE" N/AO Y[

NEI UE-N/AEJ YZ NEI U[E-N/AE]

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 976 of1014 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 6 Status: YZ N-] UD--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC-058 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. -4 Room, Area 421, column 18

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[E N E] U r-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

The front panel for boxes B3080-NA and B3948-NA were missing screws. The door for B3080-NA is able to freely move. The door for B3948-NA could not be opened with minimal pulling. CR-WF3-2012-07517 and WR 293611 were initiated for these conditions. The loose front covers for these two boxes will not have any adverse impact on any safety related equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

In addition to the conditions described in the response to question 7, corrosion was found on valve CC MVAAA661A.

This is not extensive corrosion but CR-WF3-2012-07519 was written to track this condition.

Evaluated by:* Gr Dae:'//

, / "4ý te geor N. Ferguson Date:

IZ' 19 /17' Stephen Picard

/iI EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 977 of`1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 31 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 6 Status: YZ NEI U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC-058 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. -4 Room, Area 421, column 18 SWEL Components: SWELl-079 Photographs Note: Area above SG ILT1115A Note: Box located above SG IL T1115A EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 978 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 32 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 6 Status: YN Nr-] U' Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC-058 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. -4 Room, Area 421, column 18 SWEL Components: SWELl-079 Photographs Note: Boxes B3080-NA and B3948-NA that are both missing screws on the right side of the front door. The /eft side has a hinge. CR-WF3-2012-07517 was initiated for this condition.

Note: Missing screw locations on box B3080-NA. The missing screws on box B3948-NA are in a similar location.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 979 of'1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 33 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 6 of 6 Status: YN NOI U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC-058 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. -4 Room, Area 421, column 18 SWEL Components: SWELl-079 Photographs 1A that has Note; valve U,*. IV corrosion.

Note: Unchocked cart near SG ILT1115A.

After notification, cart was removed and properly stored elsewhere.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 980 of'1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 34 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YE N-I ULI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC-059 Location: Bldg. ANN Floor El. +21 Room, Area Room 420 SWEL Components: SWELl- 019 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

The equipment in this area is either mounted directly to the concrete wall of the shield building using anchor bolts, or it is line-mounted on piping that penetrates through the containment vessel.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage did not show any signs of corrosion. The anchor plates and anchors showed no signs of any degradatioin.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

There is no HVAC ducting above this valve or operator. The conduits that are above the valve are all mounted properly and meet seismic mounting requirements.

YZ NEI UI-N/AL]

YN ND-UL-N/AL!

YN NEI UI-N/AED EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F11-2013-0024 Page 981 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 35 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YN N[-

U-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC-059 Location: Bldg. ANN Floor El. +21 Room, Area Room 420

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

There are no items directly above or adjacent to the valve and operator that will create any spatial interaction concerns.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

There are no lines directly above this valve and operator that could cause any flooding or spray. The valve is at elevation +52-6", while the floor in the annulus is at elevation 6". No flooding could occur that would affect this valve.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The annulus area is basically an empty area. No flammable materials were found around this valve and operator.

YZ NO u-] N/A]

YZ N-u-

N/AC]

YE*

N-UL-N/AE

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

There were no housekeeping issues found around or above this valve and operator.

YN NE u-N/AU*

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3FI-2013-0024 Page 982 of1014 ATTACHMENT 9.7 Sheet 3 of 3 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC-059 Location: Bldg. ANN Floor El. +21 Room, Area Room 420

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Status: Y[

NI-UM YN NEýUO Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Photos of this area were not able to be obtained.

Evaluated by: Gregqory N. Ferqusonizz j-J Date:

/r SteC PCd__

/I Steohen Picard

Z--***-

?.l EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 983 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 37 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 5 Status: YN NEIl U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC-060 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. +35 Room, Area, Room 421, Column 17 SWEL Components: SWEL1-037 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

All equipment in the area is mounted and anchored securely.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

No anchorage degradation was found.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

While there was no HVAC ducting in the general area, there were conduits mounted overhead and/or nearby. These were mounted securely and do not cause any adverse seismic conditions.

YZ NEI UD-N/AEl YO NEI UL-N/A[l Y[

NEI UEI N/A[1 1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 984 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 38 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NEI UI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC-060 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. +35 Room, Area Room 421, Column 17

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

YN NEI ULI NIAO

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

There is some material placed within the Area Walk-By zone for this area. The contractor in charge of the area has processed storage permits for this equipment so that it meets the site procedure requirements for housekeeping. This equipment will be removed from Containment prior to the completion of RF18.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

There is some material placed within the Area Walk-By zone for this area. The contractor in charge of the area has processed storage permits for this equipment so that it meets the site procedure requirements for housekeeping. This equipment will be removed from Containment prior to the completion of RF18.

YE NEI UE-N/AE]

YE] NEI UE-N/AE]

Y[

NEI uEl N/AE]

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 985 of1014 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ Nr--

U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC-060 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. +35 Room, Area Room 421, Column 17

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[-] UF]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Gregory N. Ferguson di-i 7,

L Date:

/,{7

,k" Stephen Picard 12 /11 (M EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 986 ofl 114 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 40 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YE NEI UI--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC-060 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. +35 Room, Area Room 421, Column 17 SWEL Components: SWELl-037 Photographs Note: View to side of valve and operator.

Note: View above valve and operator.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 987 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-1 2-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 41 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[*] NEI UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC-060 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. +35 Room, Area Room 421, Column 17 SWEL Components: SWELl-037 Photographs Note: View above and to side of valve and operator.

Note: View of work station (plus lead shielding) in area.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 988 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 42 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 5 Status: YM NEIl UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 061 Location: Bldg. CTB Floor El. +30 Room, Areal Room B60A. CL 12A-Q1 SWEL Components: SWELl-059 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

Spalled concrete was found around the edges of the embedded plates for the wet cooling tower fan support structure. This condition was previously identified and evaluated in CR-WF3-2002-0037 for the WCT B fans 1 - 4. CR-WF3-2001-00748 was written to identify the same condition for WCT B fans 5 - 8. These were both evaluated through the corrective action process and determined to be acceptable.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

YN NEIl UE-N/AE YZ N[-1 U-- N/AEl YN NEI UE1 N/AE:

1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 989 of1O14 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 43 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YN Nr-U-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 061 Location: Bldg. CTB Floor El. +30 Room, Area Room B60A,

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6, Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7, Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

YN NEI U[ N/ALI YN NEI iUl N/ADl YN NDI UD N/ADl YE ND_1 UD N/A[]

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 990 of1014 ATTACHMENT 9.7 Sheet 3 of 5 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Status: YN NEI UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC-061 Location: Bldg. CTB Floor El. +30 Room, Area Room B60A

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ No UI-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

The wet cooling tower fans are located on the top elevation of this area of the plant. There is no surrounding or overhead equipment.

Evaluated by: Grego N. Fer uson Date:

tZ-!Z1i//

Stephen Picard 1*

1-2 12' 2.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 991 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 45 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YN NOI-U-

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC-061 Location: Bldg. CTB Floor El. +30 Room, Area Room B60 SWEL Components: SWELl-059 Photographs Note: Spalled concrete around embedded support plates.

Note: Spalled concrete around embedded support plates.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 992 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 46 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y*] NE"l ur-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 061 Location: Bldg. CTB Floor El. +30 Room, Area Room B60 SWEL Components: SWELl-059 Note: Spalled concrete around embedded plates.

Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3FI-2013-0024 Page 993 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 47 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 7 Status: YN NEI-U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 062 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. -4 Room, Areal Room 423 SWEL Components: SWELl-080 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

YN NE] U[] N/ALl YN NEI U[E N/AEl YN NEI UL-N/AL1

' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 994 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 48 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 7 Status: Y[

NEI U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 062 Location: Bldg. ROB Floor El. -4 Room, Area Room 423

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

A large amount of scaffolding is still installed around this area for the steam generator replacement project. However, all of the scaffolding and temporary platforms meet all plant and Entergy scaffolding installation requirements.

YEE NEI JEI NIAEf YZ N-U-] N/AED YN ND U[D N/ADJ YN NDI U[-

N/AD EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3Fl-2013-0024 Page 995 of1014 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 7 Status: YN N[-D UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC-062 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. -4 Room, Area Room 423

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] U[-

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Corrosion was found on line 3CC1 1/2-35-B2. This line is coming out of the Reactor Coolant 2B pump shroud. CR-WF3-2012-07680 was written for this condition.

Electrical boxes were found with I or 2 missing screws on the front cover of the box. There were several screws installed on the light cover. CR-WF3-2012-07681 was written for this condition.

Evaluated by: Gregor N Fer-quson

"-t.-"-'

Date:

Stephen Picard

o.

3 1/11

/C3 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 996 ofi 014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 50 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 7 Status: YZ NEIl UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC-062 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. -4 Room, Area Room 423 SWEL Components: SWELl-080 Photographs Note: Corroded line 3CCI 1/2-35-B2. CR-WF3-2012-07680 was written for this condition.

Note: Corroded line 3CC1 1/2-35-B2. CR-WF3-2012-07680 was written for this condition.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 997 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 51 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 7 Status: Y; NEIr UD--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 062 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. -4 Room, Area Room 423 SWEL Components: SWELl-080 Note: Line 3CC1 1/2-59-B2. No corrosion was found on this line.

Note: Area near RTD showing scaffolding equipment in place.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 998 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 52 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 6 of 7 Status: YX NO U-D Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 062 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. -4 Room, Area Room 423 SWEL Components: SWELl-080 Note: Area near RTD showing scaffolding equipment in place.

Note: Box B3344-NA with missing screw on front cover. CR-WF3-2012-07681 was written for this condition.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 999 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 53 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 7 of 7 Status: YZ NEil ULI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 062 Location: Bldg. RCB Floor El. -4 Room, Area Room 423 SWEL Components: SWELl-080 Note: Box B3081-NA with missing screw on front cover. CR-WF3-2012-07681 was written for this condition.

Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 1000 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 54 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 7 Status: YZ NEIl ur-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 063 Location: Bldg. FHB Floor El. +1 Room, Area' Electrical Equipment Room SWEL Components: SWEL2- 001. 002, 003. 006. 007. 008. 009 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

All anchorage appeared to be adequate.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

No degraded conditions were seen on any of the anchorage in this room.

YZ NEI UD N/AEl Y[

NEI uD-N/A[D

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

All conduits are well supported seismically. The amount of fill in the raceway could not be determined as there were covers over the trays.

No HVAC ducting is inside this room.

YE NE-u-- N/A[:

' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 1001 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 55 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 7 Status: YZ N[-- UL]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 063 Location: Bldg. FHB Floor El. +1 Room, Area Electrical Equipment Room

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

There did not appear to be any spatial interaction issues in this room.

The lights are high enough to not be able to hit any sensitive equipment if they did move any during an earthquake. All other equipment in the room is obviously seismically mounted.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No equipment was found in the room that could cause flooding or spray.

YE NEI U[:] NIAf YZ NEI UEJ NIA[3

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No flammable materials were found in this room.

YZ NO~ LiE N/AOl

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

A tool box is stored in this room, but does have the proper temporary storage permit in place.

YE NEI-UL-N/A[]

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 1002 of1014 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 7 Status: YZ NE] UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 063 Location: Bldg. FHB Floor El. +1 Room, Area Electrical Equipment Room

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ Nr-D UF-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Gregor N. Fe uson Date:

/3 Stephen Picard 3- /,

/C EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 1003 of`1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 57 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 7 Status: YM NE-- ULI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 063 Location: Bldg. FHB Floor El. +1 Room, Area Electrical Equipment Room SWEL Components: SWEL2- 001. 002. 003. 006. 007. 008. 009 Photoqraphs Note: View of MCC 314A and a portion of north wall of room.

Note: View of MCC 314B and portion of north wall of room. DANGER tag is on a breaker that had a temporary modification during RF18.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Enclosure to Attachment L W3F1-2013-0024 Revision 1 Page 1004 of1014 Page 58 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 7 Status: Y] NEI-U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 063 Location: Bldg. FHB Floor El. +1 Room, Area Electrical Equipment Room SWEL Components: SWEL2- 001, 002, 003, 006, 007, 008, 009 7

f Note: Looking b4 Note: Looking into overhead over bay 6 of MCC 314A panel. The open door is for a temporary modification during RF18.

4A panel.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 1005 ofi 014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 59 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 6 of 7 Status: Y; NEIl U-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 063 Location: Bldg. FHB Floor El. +1 Room, Area Electrical Equipment Room SWEL Components: SWEL2- 001. 002. 003, 006, 007. 008, 009 Note: Looking behind MCC 314B panel.

Large cable in overhead is for a temporary modification in place during RF18.

Note: Looking behind MCC 314B panel.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 1006 of 1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment L Revision 1 Page 60 of 60 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 7 of 7 Status: YO NEI UD-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AWC- 063 Location: Bldg. FHB Floor El. +1 Room, Area Electrical Equipment Room SWEL Components: SWEL2- 001. 002. 003. 006. 007. 008. 009 Note: Looking behind the MCC 314A panel.

Note: Looking along south wall of room.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 1007 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment M Revision 1 Page 1 of 2 Attachment M Licensing Basis Evaluation Form (Revision 1)

See Attachment F for Revision 0 LBE Forms

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 1008 of 1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment M Revision 1 Page 2 of 2 Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form LB Evaluation No.

LB-08 Originating SWC/AWC SWELl-002 Equipment ID No.

SSDEMCC311B Equip. Class Equipment Description Motor Control Center 311 B Location: Bldg.

RAB Floor El.

+21 Room, Area 212 Condition Two conduits were found to be -1/4" from the west end of SSDEMCC31 1 B.

Documents Reviewed

1. EPRI report 1025286, "Seismic Walkdown Guidance for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic"

2. SQRT File SQ-E-2 Licensing Basis Adjacent equipment should not be able to strike safety related SSCs and cause any malfunctions or damage.

Evaluation The flexibility of the conduits and the MCC panel were determined. This was attached to SWELl -002 and is located in Appendix K to WF3-CS-12-00003, Revision 1.

Conclusion (8) Condition Meets the Licensing Basis:

0 Yes 0

No Prepared by:

Reviewed by:

Greg Ferguson Licensing Basis Reviewer Nigel Elias Peer Reviewer Date 3/5/13 Date 3/21/13 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 1009 of 1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Attachment N Rev. 1 Page 1 of 2 Attachment N Seismic Walkdown Engineer Training Certificate (Revision 1)

Revisio

(

I~~2IELECT21C POWER MR031 IRESEARCH INSTflUTE CD7 CD 0.

Certificateof Completion Nigel Elias Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3

- Plant Seismic Walkdowns July 11, 2012 Date Robert K. Kassawara EPRI Manager, Structural Reliability & Integrity

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 1011 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Rev. 1 Page 1 of 4 SWEL vs. AWC Numbers (Revision 1)

Enclosure to W3FI-2013-0024 Page 1012 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Revision 1 Page 2 of 4 SWEL vs. AWC Number List SWEL SWEL in AWC AWC in Number Report Rev.

Number Report Rev.

1-001 0

AWC-042 0

1-002 1

AWC-018 0

1-003 0

AWC-014 0

1-004 1

AWC-019 1

1-005 2*

AWC-064 2*

1-006 1

AWC-016 0

1-007 0

AWC-018 0

1-008 0

AWC-008 0

1-009 0

AWC-020 0

1-010 0

AWC-007 0

1-011 0

AWC-029 0

1-012 0

AWC-001 0

1-013 0

AWC-002 0

1-014 0

AWC-024 0

1-015 0

AWC-013 0

1-016 0

AWC-005 0

1-017 0

AWC-030 0

1-018 1

AWC-054 1

1-019 1

AWC-059 1

1-020 0

AWC-011 0

1-021 0

AWC-024 0

1-022 0

AWC-030 0

1-023 0

AWC-003 0

1-024 0

AWC-009 0

1-025 0

AWC-028 0

1-026 1

AWC-031 1

1-027 0

AWC-044 0

1-028 0

AWC-044 0

1-029 2*

AWC-038 0

1-030 0

AWC-003 0

1-031 0

AWC-037 0

1-032 0

AWC-036 0

1-033 0

AWC-030 0

1-034 0

AWC-042 0

1-035 0

AWC-043 0

1-036 0

AWC-001 0

1-037 1

AWC-060 1

1-038 1

AWC-056 1

1-039 0

AWC-015 0

1-040 0

AWC-005 0

1-041 0

AWC-037 0

1-042 0

AWC-039 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 1013 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Revision 1 Page 3 of 4 SWEL SWEL in AWC AWC in Number Report Rev.

Number Report Rev.

1-043 0

AWC-025 0

1-044 0

AWC-042 0

1-045 0

AWC-042 0

1-046 0

AWC-042 0

1-047 1

AWC-057 1

1-048 1

AWC-057 1

1-049 0

AWC-037 0

1-050 0

AWC-037 0

1-051 0

AWC-002 0

1-052 0

AWC-028 0

1-053 0

AWC-028 0

1-054 0

AWC-028 0

1-055 0

AWC-028 0

1-056 0

AWC-004 0

1-057 0

AWC-028 0

1-058 0

AWC-028 0

1-059 1

AWC-061 1

1-060 0

AWC-010 0

1-061 0

AWC-038 0

1-062 0

AWC-038 0

1-063 0

AWC-036 0

1-064 0

AWC-038 0

1-065 0

AWC-022 0

1-066 0

AWC-004 0

1-067 0

AWC-037 0

1-068 0

AWC-018 0

1-069 0

AWC-018 0

1-070 0

AWC-017 0

1-071 0

AWC-016 0

1-072 0

AWC-025 0

1-073 0

AWC-040 0

1-074 0

AWC-035 0

1-075 1

AWC-056 1

1-076 0

AWC-030 0

1-077 1

AWC-055 1

1-078 0

AWC-041 0

1-079 1

AWC-058 1

1-080 1

AWC-062 1

1-081 0

AWC-025 0

1-082 0

AWC-016 0

1-083 0

AWC-053 0

1-084 1

AWC-032 0

1-085 0

AWC-032 0

1-086 0

AWC-032 0

Enclosure to W3F1-2013-0024 Page 1014 of1014 Engineering Report No. WF3-CS-12-00003 Revision 1 Page 4 of 4 SWEL SWEL in AWC AWC in Number Report Rev.

Number Report Rev.

1-087 0

AWC-016 0

1-088 0

AWC-037 0

1-089 0

AWC-005 0

1-090 0

AWC-023 0

1-091 0

AWC-040 0

1-092 0

AWC-006 0

1-093 0

AWC-029 0

1-094 0

AWC-021 0

1-095 0

AWC-045 0

1-096 0

AWC-045 0

1-097 1

AWC-018 0

2-001 2*

AWC-063 1

2-002 2*

AWC-063 1

2-003 2*

AWC-063 1

2-004 0

AWC-052 0

2-005 0

AWC-053 0

2-006 2*

AWC-063 1

2-007 2*

AWC-063 1

2-008 2*

AWC-063 1

2-009 2*

AWC-063 1

2-010 0

AWC-022 0

2-011 0

AWC-022 0

2-012 0

AWC-048 0

2-013 0

AWC-049 0

2-014 0

AWC-050 0

2-015 0

AWC-048 0

2-016 0

AWC-049 0

2-017 0

AWC-046 0

2-018 0

AWC-046 0

2-019 0

AWC-046 0

2-020 0

AWC-047 0

2-021 0

AWC-051 0

2-022 0

AWC-050 0

2-023 0

AWC-050 0

2-024 0

AWC-050 0

2-025 0

AWC-050 0

2-026 0

AWC-050 0

Revision 2 to be issued later The following AWC numbers were not used in this report:

AWC-012 AWC-026 AWC-027 AWC-033 AWC-034

ML13120A462

Text

Title:

Title:

Navigation menu

Search