L-PI-15-022, Fourth Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051)
| ML15057A306 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Prairie Island  |
| Issue date: | 02/26/2015 |
| From: | Davison K Northern States Power Co, Xcel Energy |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| EA-12-051, L-PI-15-022 | |
| Download: ML15057A306 (16) | |
Text
I nergy@ Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant 1717 Wakonade Drive East Welch, MN 55089 February 26, 2015 L-PI-15-022 10 CFR 2.202 10 CFR 50.4 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Units 1 and 2 Docket Numbers 50-282 and 50-306 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-42 and DPR-60 Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant's Fourth Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12. 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051)
References:
- 1. NRC Order EA-12-051, "Issuance of Order to Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation," dated March 12, 2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML12054A682).
- 2. NRC Interim Staff Guidance JLD-ISG-2012-03, "Compliance with Order EA-12-051, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation," Revision 0, dated August 29, 2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML12221A339).
- 3. NEI 12-02, "Industry Guidance for Compliance with NRC Order EA 051, 'To Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation,"' Revision 1, dated August 2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML12240A307).
- 4. NRC Letter to NSPM, Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2 "Interim Staff Evaluation and Request for Additional Information Regarding the Overall Integrated Plan for Implementation of Order EA 051, Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (TAG NOS. MF0832 and MF0833)," dated November 14, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No. ML13311A486).
Document Control Desk Page 2
- 5. NSPM Letter to NRC, "Initial Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051)," dated October 29, 2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML12305A313).
- 6. NSPM Letter to NRC, "Overall Integrated Plan in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051)," dated February 26,2013 (ADAMS Accession No. ML13060A363).
- 7. NSPM Letter to NRC, "Prairie Island's First Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051)," dated August 26, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No. ML13239A093).
- 8. NSPM Letter to NRC, "Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant's Second Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051) (TAG Nos. MF0832 and MF0833)," dated February 26, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14057A647).
- 9. NSPM Letter to NRC, "Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant's Third Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051) (TAG Nos. MF0832 and MF0833)," dated August 25, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14237A485).
On March 12, 2012, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff issued Order EA-12-051, "Issuance of Order to Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation," (Reference 1) to all NRC power reactor licensees and holders of construction permits in active or deferred status. Reference 1 was immediately effective and directs Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation (NSPM), doing business as Xcel Energy, to have a reliable indication of the water level in the spent fuel storage pool for Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant (PINGP) Units 1 and 2. Specific requirements are outlined in Attachment 2 of Reference 1.
Pursuant to Condition C of Section IV, Reference 1 required submission of an initial status report 60 days following issuance of the final interim staff guidance (ISG), an overall integrated plan, and status reports at six-month intervals following the submittal
Document Control Desk Page 3 of the overall integrated plan. The ISG (Reference 2) endorses, with exceptions and clarifications, the methodologies described in a guidance document from the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), NEI 12-02, "Industry Guidance for Compliance with Order EA 051, 'To Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation,"'
Revision 1 (Reference 3). Reference 4 provided the NRC interim staff evaluation of the overall integrated plan (Reference 6) and request for additional information.
Reference 5 provided the PINGP initial 60-day status report regarding reliable spent fuel pool instrumentation. Reference 6 provided the overall integrated plan for PINGP.
References 7, 8, and 9 provided the first, second, and third six-month status reports, respectively, for the overall integrated plan, per Condition C.2 of Section IV of Reference 1.
The purpose of this letter is to provide the fourth six-month status report pursuant to Section IV, Condition C.2 of Reference 1, which delineates the progress made in implementing the requirements of the Reference 1 Order. The enclosed report provides an update of milestone accomplishments since the overall integrated plan was submitted, including changes to the compliance method, schedule, or the need and basis for relief, if any.
Please contact Stevie DuPont, Licensing Engineer, at 651-267-7421, if additional information or clarification is required.
Summary of Commitments This letter makes no new commitments and no revisions to existing commitments.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on February 26, 2015.
~L*Jl~~*
Kevin Davison Site Vice President, Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Northern States Power Company - Minnesota Enclosure cc: Administrator, Region Ill, USNRC Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR), USNRC Project Manager, Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, USNRC Resident Inspector, Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, USNRC
L-PI-15-0022 NSPM Enclosure ENCLOSURE Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Units 1 and 2 Fourth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of Order EA-12-051, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation 1.0 Introduction The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued Order EA-12-051, "Issuance of Order to Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation," on March 12, 2012 (Reference 1). The Order requires licensees to have reliable indication of the water level in associated spent fuel pools capable of supporting identification of the following spent fuel pool water level conditions by trained personnel: (1) level that is adequate to support operation of the normal fuel pool cooling system, (2) level that is adequate to provide substantial radiation shielding for a person standing on the spent fuel pool operating deck, and (3) level where fuel remains covered and actions to implement make-up water addition should no longer be deferred. The Order required licensees to submit an overall integrated plan, including a description of how the requirements in Attachment 2 of the Order would be achieved. Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation (NSPM), doing business as Xcel Energy, submitted the overall integrated plan (Reference 2) for the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant (PINGP) Units 1 and 2, on February 26, 2013. References 4, 5 and 9 provided the first, second and third six-month status reports for the overall integrated plan, per Condition C.2 of Section IV of Reference 1.
On July 11, 2013, the NRC Staff provided requests for additional information (RAis) in Reference 6 regarding the Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (SFPI) overall integrated plan. Reference 3 provided the NSPM responses to NRC Requests for Additional Information (RAis) regarding the overall integrated plan for PINGP.
On November 14, 2013, the NRC issued an Interim Staff Evaluation (ISE) for PINGP's SFPI overall integrated plan (Reference 7). The ISE documents the NRC Staff's review and provides feedback on NSPM's overall integrated plan. The ISE also includes RAis, response to which the NRC Staff needs to complete their review. The RAis issued by the NRC in the ISE supersede the RAis reported in the Reference 6.
This Enclosure provides the PINGP Units 1 and 2 fourth six-month status report. This status report includes an update of milestone accomplishments since the previous six-month status report was submitted, including any changes to the compliance method, schedule, or the need and basis for relief, if any.
Page 1 of 13
L-PI-15-0022 NSPM Enclosure 2.0 Milestone Accomplishments The original milestone schedule, with target dates, was provided in Section 1.2 of Reference 2. No milestones were scheduled for completion subsequent to the previous six-month status report and prior to January 31, 2015. Therefore, NSPM has no milestone accomplishments to discuss.
3.0 Milestone Schedule Status The following table provides an update of the milestone schedule to support the overall integrated plan. This includes a brief milestone status and a revised target date if the date has changed. The dates are planning dates subject to change as design and implementation details are developed. No target completion dates for milestones have completed or changed for this six-month status report. However, as noted in Section 6 of the third six-month status report (Reference 9), NSPM will provide the responses to the ISE RAis via the online reference portal (ePortal) by March 31, 2015 instead of in this six-month status report.
Table 1 -Overall Integrated Plan Milestone Schedule Milestone Target Activity Status Revised Completion Target Date Completion Date Submit 60 Day Status Report October 2012 Complete Submit Overall Integrated Plan February 2013 Complete Select Instrument Vendor (Target 1st Quarter 2013 Complete date 1st Quarter 2013)
Submit First Six-month Status August 2013 Complete Update Commence Engineering Design 3ra Quarter 2013 Complete (Design Started)
Submit Second Six-Month Status February 2014 Complete Update Submit Third Six-Month Status August 2014 Complete Update Submit Fourth Six-Month Status February 2015 Complete with Update (includes responses to this submittal Requests for Additional Information (RAis))
Commence Installation 2na Quarter Not Started 2015 Page 2 of 13
L-PI-15-0022 NSPM Enclosure Table 1 - Overall Integrated Plan Milestone Schedule (Continued)
Milestone Target Activity Status Revised Completion Target Date Completion Date Submit Fifth Six-Month Status August 2015 Not Started Update (includes responses to remaining RAis)
Reliable Spent Fuel Pool End of 2R29 Not Started Instrumentation Operational Submit Report that Full 1st Quarter Not Started Compliance is Achieved 2016 4.0 Proposed Changes to Compliance Method There are no changes proposed to the compliance method described in the overall integrated plan (Reference 2).
5.0 Need and Basis for Relief from the Requirements of the Order NSPM expects to comply with the Order implementation date and requirements and no relief is required at this time.
6.0 Open Items from Overall Integrated Plan and Interim Staff Evaluation NSPM has not identified any open items in the overall integrated plan for PINGP. The overall integrated plan contained future actions to ensure compliance with the Order.
The future actions were identified internally and are being tracked through NSPM's corrective action program (CAP).
On November 14, 2013, the NRC issued the ISE for PINGP's SFPI overall integrated plan (Reference 7). The ISE identified RAis that were necessary for the NRC to determine the acceptability of NSPM's plans for implementing the requirements of Order EA-12-051. In Reference 5, NSPM stated that the responses to the NRC's ISE RAis will be provided in the fourth six-month status report scheduled for February 2015.
Subsequently, the NRC notified each licensee participating in the audit not to formally submit their RAI responses on the docket but instead, put their responses and any other supporting information on their online reference portal (ePortal) by the date identified in their ISE to support the NRC Staff's review process (Reference 8). In accordance with this guidance from the NRC, NSPM will provide the responses to the ISE RAis via the Page 3 of 13
L-PI-15-0022 NSPM Enclosure online reference portal (ePortal) by March 31, 2015 instead of in this six-month status report. Incorporation of the RAI responses into these status reports was discussed in Reference 3.
Table 2 - Interim Staff Evaluation Request for Additional Information RAI Description Status Number 1 Please provide the results of the calculation used to Completed determine the water elevation necessary for the pump's Response required NPSH to confirm that Level1 has been adequately provided in identified. upload to online reference portal (ePortal) 2 Please provide the results of the evaluation to be Completed performed to determine the projected dose rate impact and Response the appropriate Level 2 value as a result of other hardware provided in stored in the SFP. upload to online reference portal (ePortal) 3 Please describe the impact of the installation of the Started pneumatic sealed gates on the reliability of the SFP level instrumentation for each SFP, and what compensatory measures would be taken to ensure reliable level indication in each SFP when the gate is installed.
4 Please provide a clearly labeled sketch or marked-up plant Started drawing of the plan view of the SFP area, depicting the proposed routing of the cables that will extend from the sensors toward the location of the read-out/display device.
Page 4 of 13
L-PI-15-0022 NSPM Enclosure Table 2 - Interim Staff Evaluation Request for Additional Information (Continued)
RAI Description Status Number 5 Please provide additional information describing how the Started final arrangement of the SFP instrumentation and routing of the cabling between the level instruments, the electronics and the displays, meets the Order requirement to arrange the SFP level instrument channels in a manner that provides reasonable protection of the level indication function against missiles that may result from damage to the structure over the SFP.
Page 5 of 13
L-PI-15-0022 NSPM Enclosure Table 2 - Interim Staff Evaluation Request for Additional Information (Continued)
RAI Description Status Number 6 Please provide the following: Completed
Response
a) The design criteria that will be used to estimate the provided in total loading on the mounting device(s), including upload to static weight loads and dynamic loads. Describe the online reference portal methodology that will be used to estimate the total (ePortal) loading, inclusive of design basis maximum seismic loads and the hydrodynamic loads that could result from pool sloshing or other effects that could accompany such seismic forces.
b) A description of the manner in which the level sensor (and stilling well, if appropriate) will be attached to the refueling floor and/or other support structures for each planned point of attachment of the probe assembly. Indicate in a schematic the portions of the level sensor that will serve as points of attachment for mechanical/mounting or electrical connections.
c) A description of the manner by which the mechanical connections will attach the level instrument to permanent SFP structures so as to support the level sensor assembly.
d) A description of how other material stored in the SFP will not create adverse interaction with the fixed instrument location(s).
7 For RAI 6(a) above, please provide the analyses used to Completed verify the design criteria and methodology for seismic Response testing of the SFP instrumentation and the electronics provided in units, including, design basis maximum seismic loads and upload to the hydrodynamic loads that could result from pool sloshing online or other effects that could accompany such seismic forces. reference portal (ePortal)
Page 6 of 13
L-P 1-15-0022 NSPM Enclosure Table 2 - Interim Staff Evaluation Request for Additional Information (Continued)
RAJ Description Status Number 8 For each of the mounting attachments required to attach Completed SFP Level equipment to plant structures, please describe Response the design inputs, and the methodology that was used to provided in qualify the structural integrity of the affected upload to structures/equipment. online reference portal (ePortal) 9 Please provide the following: Completed
Response
a) A description of the specific method or combination of provided in methods you intend to apply to demonstrate the reliability upload to of the permanently installed equipment under BOB ambient online temperature, humidity, shock, vibration, and radiation reference conditions. portal (ePortal) b) A description of the testing and/or analyses that will be conducted to provide assurance that the equipment will perform reliably under the worst case credible design basis loading at the location where the equipment will be mounted. Include a discussion of this seismic reliability demonstratio~ as it applies to a) the level sensor mounted in the SFP area, and b) any control boxes, electronics, or read-out and re-transmitting devices that will be employed to convey the level information from the level sensor to the plant operators or emergency responders.
c) A description of the specific method or combination of methods that will be used to confirm the reliability of the permanently installed equipment such that following a seismic event the instrument will maintain its required accuracy.
Page 7 of 13
L-PI-15-0022 NSPM Enclosure Table 2 - Interim Staff Evaluation Request for Additional Information (Continued)
RAI Description Status Number 10 For RAI #9 above, please provide the results for the Completed selected methods, tests and analyses used to demonstrate Response the qualification and reliability of the installed equipm~nt in provided in accordance with the Order requirements. upload to online reference portal (ePortal) 11 Please provide the following: Completed
Response
a) A description of how the two channels of the provided in proposed level measurement system meet this upload to requirement so that the potential for a common online reference cause event to adversely affect both channels is portal (ePortal) minimized to the extent practicable.
b) Further Information on how each level measurement system, consisting of level sensor electronics, cabling, and readout devices will be designed and installed to address independence through the application and selection of independent power sources, the use of physical and spatial separation, independence of signals sent to the location(s) of the readout devices, and the independence of the displays.
12 Please provide the following: Completed
Response
a) A description of the electrical ac power sources and provided in capabilities for the primary and backup channels. upload to online b) Please provide the results of the calculation depicting reference the battery backup duty cycle requirements demonstrating portal (ePortal) that its capacity is sufficient to maintain the level indication function until offsite resource availability is reasonably assured.
Page 8 of 13
L-PI-15-0022 NSPM Enclosure Table 2 - Interim Staff Evaluation Request for Additional Information (Continued)
RAJ Description Status Number 13 Please provide the following: Started a) An estimate of the expected instrument channel accuracy performance under both (a) normal SFP level conditions (approximately Level1 or higher) and (b) at the BOB conditions (i.e., radiation, temperature, humidity, post-seismic and post- shock conditions) that would be present if the SFP level were at the Level 2 and Level 3 datum points.
b) A description of the methodology that will be used for determining the maximum allowed deviation from the instrument channel design accuracy that will be employed under normal operating conditions as an acceptance criterion for a calibration procedure to flag to operators and to technicians that the channel requires adjustment to within the normal condition design accuracy.
Page 9 of 13
L-PI-15-0022 NSPM Enclosure Table 2 - Interim Staff Evaluation Request for Additional Information (Continued)
RAI Description Status Number 14 Please provide the following: Started a) A description of the capability and provisions the proposed level sensing equipment will have to enable periodic testing and calibration, including how this capability enables the equipment to be tested in-situ.
b) A description of how such testing and calibration will enable the conduct of regular channel checks of each independent channel against the other, and against any other permanently-installed SFP level instrumentation.
c) A description of how functional checks will be performed, and the frequency at which they will be conducted. Describe how calibration tests will be performed, and the frequency at which they will be conducted. Provide a discussion as to how these surveillances will be incorporated into the plant surveillance program.
d) A description of what preventive maintenance tasks are required to be performed during normal operation, and the planned maximum surveillance interval that is necessary to ensure that the channels are fully conditioned to accurately and reliably perform their functions when needed.
Page 10 of 13
L-PI-15-0022 NSPM Enclosure Table 2 - Interim Staff Evaluation Request for Additional Information (Continued)
RAI Description Status Number 15 Please provide the following: Completed
Response
a) The specific location for the primary and backup provided in instrument channel display. upload to online b) For any SFP level instrumentation displays located reference outside the main control room, please describe the portal (ePortal) evaluation used to validate that the display location can be accessed without unreasonable delay following a BOB event. Include the time available for personnel to access the display as credited in the evaluation, as well as the actual time (e.g., based on walk-throughs) that it will take for personnel to access the display. Additionally, please include a description of the radiological and environmental conditions on the paths personnel might take. Describe whether the display location remains habitable for radiological, heat and humidity, and other environmental conditions following a BOB event. Describe whether personnel are continuously stationed at the display or monitor the display periodically.
16 Please provide a list of the procedures addressing Started operation (both normal and abnormal response),
calibration, test, maintenance, and inspection procedures that will be developed for use of the spent SFP instrumentation. The licensee is requested to include a brief description of the specific technical .objectives to be achieved within each procedure.
Page 11 of 13
L-PI-15-0022 NSPM Enclosure Table 2 - Interim Staff Evaluation Request for Additional Information (Continued)
RAI Description Status Number 17 Please provide the following: Started a) Further information describing the maintenance and testing program the licensee will establish and implement to ensure that regular testing and calibration is performed and verified by inspection and audit to demonstrate conformance with design and system readiness requirements. Please include a description of the plans for ensuring that necessary channel checks, functional tests, periodic calibration, and maintenance will be conducted for the level measurement system and its supporting equipment.
b) Information describing compensatory actions when both channels are out-of-order, and the implementation procedures.
c) Additional information describing expedited and compensatory actions in the maintenance procedure to address when one of the instrument channels cannot be restored to functional status within 90 days.
Note: Completed RAI responses above are provided in upload to online reference portal (ePortal), Xcel Energy Fukushima Response, Prairie Island- SFPI.
7.0 Potential Draft Safety Evaluation Impacts There are no potential impacts to the draft Safety Evaluation identified at this time.
8.0 References
- 1. NRC Order EA-12-051, "Issuance of Order to Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation," dated March 12, 2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML12054A682).
- 2. NSPM Letter to NRC, "Overall Integrated Plan in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Page 12 of 13
L-PI-15-0022 NSPM Enclosure Number EA-12-051)," dated February 26, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No. ML13060A363).
- 3. NSPM Letter to NRC, "Responses to Requests for Additional Information Regarding Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant's Overall Integrated Plan Submitted in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051) (TAG Nos. MF0832 and MF0833)," dated August 6, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No. ML13219A859).
- 4. NSPM Letter to NRC, "Prairie Island's First Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051)," dated August 26, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No. ML13239A093).
- 5. NSPM Letter to NRC, "Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant's Second Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051) (TAG Nos. MF0832 and MF0833)," dated February 26, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14057A647).
- 6. NRC Email to NSPM, "Prairie Island Units 1 and 2- Draft RAI RE: OIP for Reliable SFP Instrumentation (TAG Nos. MF0832 and MF0833)," dated July 11, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No. ML13205A355).
- 7. NRC Letter to NSPM, "Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2 Interim Staff Evaluation and Request for Additional Information Regarding the Overall Integrated Plan for Implementation of Order EA-12-051, Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (TAG Nos. MF0832 AND MF0833)," dated November 14, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No. ML13311A486).
- 8. NRC Letter, "Nuclear Regulatory Commission Audits of Licensees Responses to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation Order EA-12-051 ,"dated March 26, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14083A620).
- 9. NSPM Letter to NRC, "Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant's Third Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051) (TAG Nos. MF0832 and MF0833)," dated August 25, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14237A485).
Page 13 of 13